[Elbow hemiarthroplasty for coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus]. / Ellenbogenhemiprothese bei koronaren Abscherfrakturen des distalen Humerus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the operation is to replace the articular surface of the distal humerus in cases of nonreconstructible fractures of the distal humerus. INDICATIONS: Active patients with high functional requirements, in whom weight limitation of total elbow arthroplasty should be avoided. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Contraindications include fractures with irreconstructible epicondyles and/or irreconstructible collateral ligaments, as well as ulnohumeral, or radiohumeral osteoarthritis. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Following subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve, surgical dislocation of the elbow joint is achieved through a paratricipital approach with release of the soft tissue structures from the humerus. After resection of the trochlea, the intramedullary canal of the humerus is prepared using rasps in order to implant the hemiprosthesis with retrograde cementing. Finally, the medial and lateral collateral ligaments as well as the flexors and extensors are repaired. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Early functional rehabilitation in a hinged elbow orthosis while avoiding varus/valgus stress after wound healing is completed. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2022, 18 patients with coronal shear fractures were treated with elbow hemiarthroplasty. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 79 (70-95) after a mean follow-up of 12 months. The mean range of motion was 99° (70-130°) in extension-flexion and 162° (90-180°) in pronation-supination.

Low and high body mass index and lower numbers of screws in the articular segment are risk factors for non-union of distal humeral fractures in the elderly: A multi-center retrospective study (TRON study).

Background: Distal humerus fracture in the elderly is a challenging fracture for orthopedic surgeons. Non-union is one of the serious complications of distal humerus fracture after surgery. This retrospective multicenter study aimed to estimate the incidence of distal humeral non-union after open reduction and internal fixation, determine factors related to non-union, and compare the postoperative results of cases with non-union to cases with the union. Methods: Among 423 patients diagnosed with distal humeral fracture and who were treated by surgical therapy in 2010-2020 from our database called TRON. Only 190 subjects met the inclusion criteria. We performed a logistic regression analysis with the presence of non-union as the response variable to examine risk factors. We compare the Mayo Elbow Performance Scores of cases with non-union to cases with the union. Results: Non-union occurred after surgery in 15 patients (7.9%). The logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index<20 kg/m2 and ≥25 kg/m2, and ≤3 screws in the articular segment were significant explanatory factors for non-union (odds ratio 10.4 and 47.8, respectively). The Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were significantly worse in patients with non-union. Discussion: Low and high body mass index and three or fewer screws in the articular segment might be risk factors for non-union of distal humerus fracture in the elderly. Non-union is associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Elbow hemiarthroplasty and total elbow arthroplasty provided a similar functional outcome for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in patients aged 60 years or older: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an established treatment for elderly patients with distal humeral fractures not amenable to stable internal fixation (unreconstructable). In recent years, there has been increasing interest in elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA), a treatment option which does not entail restrictions on weight-bearing as opposed to TEA. These 2 treatments have not been compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of EHA and TEA for the treatment of unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients were included between January 2011 and November 2019 at one of 3 participating hospitals. The inclusion criteria were an unreconstructable distal humeral fracture, age ≥60 years and independent living. The final follow-up took place after ≥2 years. The primary outcome measure was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Secondary outcome measures were the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the EQ-5D index, range of motion (flexion, extension, pronation, and supination) and grip strength. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomized to TEA (n = 20) and EHA (n = 20). Five patients died before completing the final follow-up, leaving 18 EHA and 17 TEA patients for analysis. There were 31 women. The mean age was 74.0 (SD, 8.5) years in the EHA group and 76.9 (SD, 7.6) in the TEA group (P = .30). The mean DASH score was 21.6 points in the EHA group and 27.2 in the TEA group (P = .39), a difference of -5.6 points (95% CI: -18.6 to 7.5). There were no differences between treatment with EHA and TEA for the mean values of the MEPS (85.0 vs. 88.2, P = .59), EQ-5D index (0.92 vs. 0.86, P = .13), extension (29° vs. 29°, P = .98), flexion (126° vs. 136°, P = .05), arc of flexion-extension (97° vs. 107°, P = .25), supination (81° vs. 75°, P = .13), pronation (78° vs. 74°, P = .16) or grip strength (17.5 kg vs. 17.2 kg, P = .89). There were 6 adverse events in each treatment group. CONCLUSION: In this RCT, both elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) resulted in a good and similar functional outcome for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in elderly patients at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

Fracturas supracondíleas humerales pediátricas. Comparación de dos técnicas de reducción / Pediatric humeral supracondylar fractures. Comparison of two reduction techniquesin

Resumen Objetivo: Analizar los resultados de la técnica quirúrgica de colocación de clavillos Kirschner forma lateral versus cruzada en el manejo de las fracturas supracondíleas de húmero en pacientes pediátricos. Metodología: Se captaron a todos los pacientes con fractura supracondílea humeral en edad pediátrica que requirieron intervención quirúrgica, y posteriormente fueron evaluados a las 24 horas y 6 meses posterior al tratamiento quirúrgico para observar y comparar las diferencias entre cada técnica quirúrgica utilizada, tomando en cuenta las complicaciones agudas y tardías que se presentaron mediante un análisis con la prueba de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: Para el presente estudios se evaluaron 44 pacientes pediátricos de los cuales 70% eran hombres y 30% mujeres, en quienes se presentaron complicaciones nerviosas y angulares sin importancia significativa alguna con el sexo y edades de los pacientes, siendo la afección del nervio cubital la de mayor frecuencia con 33% en la colocación de forma cruzada. Al realizar la comparativa con discriminación de variables se obtiene que la colocación de forma lateral presenta menos complicaciones posquirúrgicas tempranas y tardías y que tales no se deben al azar. Limitaciones o implicaciones: En el presente estudio no se incluyó el tipo de daño mecánico que provoca este tipo de fractura, ni se consideró el ángulo de Baumann. Otra limitación inherente en la población pediátrica es la habilidad del explorador para detectar un déficit neurológico, especialmente en pacientes de edad temprana dado a que los reportes de una exploración física siempre son subjetivos. Además, dada la limitación en cuanto a los detalles del mecanismo específico de daño, se puede subestimar el número de daños provocados por mecanismos de alta energía. Originalidad y valor: Su importancia radica en que ambas técnicas quirúrgicas fueron realizadas por los mismos cirujanos y que se trata de un estudio en población mexicana, siendo un aporte para la literatura de este país. Conclusión: Ambas técnicas quirúrgicas presentan resultados posquirúrgicos con casos de lesión nerviosa, deformidad angular, dolor y edema persistente, pero la que los presenta en menor frecuencia es la técnica de colocación de clavillos Kirschner en forma lateral, además de causar una significancia estadística en cuanto a la disminución de presentar cubito valgo en el seguimiento tardío de los pacientes.

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the results of the surgical technique placement of Kirschner pins lateral versus crossed in the management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in pediatric patients. Methodology: All pediatric patients with humeral supracondylar fracture who required surgical intervention and were subsequently evaluated 24 hours and 6 months after surgical treatment to observe and compare the differences between each patient. surgical technique used. Taking into account the acute and late complications that occurred, through an analysis with the Mann-Whitney test. Results: For the present studies, 44 pediatric patients were evaluated, of whom 70% were men and 30% women, in whom nerve and angular complications presented without any significant importance with the sex and age of the patients, with ulnar nerve involvement being the most frequent with 33% in cross placement. When carrying out the comparison with discrimination of variables, it is obtained that the placement laterally presents fewer early and late post-surgical complications and that such are not due to chance. Or the present study, it is considered that a placement of Kirschner pins laterally regardless of the member, age, gender or classification; leads to better post-surgical results. Limitations or implications: In the present study, the type of mechanical damage that causes this type of fracture was not included, nor was the Baumann angle considered. Another limitation inherent in the pediatric population is the ability of the examiner to detect a neurological deficit, especially in young patients since reports of a physical examination are always subjective. Furthermore, given the limited details of the specific damage mechanism, the number of damages caused by high-energy mechanisms may be underestimated. Originality or value: Its importance lies in the fact that both surgical techniques were performed by the same surgeons and that it is a study in the mexican population, being a contribution to the literature of this country. Findings or conclusions: Both surgical techniques present post-surgical results with cases of nerve injury, angular deformity, pain and persistent edema, but the one that presents them less frequently in the technique of placement of Kirschner pins laterally, in addition to causing statistical significance in terms of the decrease of presenting cubitus valgus in the late follow-up of the patients.

Surgical flip-dislocation of the bicolumnar approach without olecranon osteotomy versus olecranon osteotomy in type AO 13C3 distal humeral fracture: a matched-cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Our experience with the surgical flip-dislocation of the bicolumnar (SFDB) approach for type AO 13C3 humeral fractures indicates that this surgical approach can be performed safely and effectively in appropriately selected patients. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the SFDB approach without olecranon osteotomy (OO) for type AO 13C3 distal humeral fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 65 cases of type AO 13C3 distal humeral fractures treated between April 2008 and July 2018; 33 patients were treated with the SFDB approach, and the remaining were treated with OO. Propensity score matching was used to control for sex, age, and the American Society of Anesthesiology score. Elbow pain, range of motion, stability, and function were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Clinical complications, reoperation rates, and radiographic results were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Operative time and blood loss were significantly lower in the SFDB group than in the OO group (P = 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). At the final follow-up, the mean postoperative MEPI did not significantly differ between the groups (P = 0.628). According to Morrey's criteria, a typical functional range of elbow motion was achieved in 12 and 15 patients in the SFDB and OO groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SFDB approach achieves superior exposure of the articular surface without injury to the extensor mechanism in type 13C3 articular surface fracture treatment. This approach also results in good early functional recovery and clinical outcomes, with a low risk of complications.

Surgical repair of Salter-Harris type II fracture of the distal humerus: short and long-term outcomes in a case series of three dogs and one cat.

CASE HISTORIES: Three dogs and one cat sustained forelimb trauma and were presented to a university veterinary clinic (Liège, Belgium) and a private veterinary hospital (Beacouzé, France). All four animals were referred for surgery. CLINICAL FINDINGS: Two dogs and the cat were ambulatory on admission but unable to bear weight on the affected limb. One dog was non-ambulatory and lacked voluntary movement and sensation in one forelimb. Salter-Harris type II fractures of the distal humerus were diagnosed by radiography in all cases; avulsion of the brachial plexus and pelvic fractures were also present in the non-ambulatory dog. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: All Salter-Harris type II fractures were stabilised by open reduction and internal fixation with cross pins. One minor complication (seroma) and three major complications (implant migration) developed after surgery. The pins were completely removed in one case and partially removed in two cases to resolve these complications. At the final follow-up examination (12-31 months after surgery), owners reported no lameness in three of the four cases and grade 2/5 left forelimb lameness in one case. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This type of fracture is rarely described in the literature; however, it should be included in the differential diagnoses of traumatic humeral fractures in growing dogs and cats. In this case series, we achieved fair-to-excellent short-term and long-term outcomes after osteosynthesis of Salter-Harris type II fractures by cross pinning.

Comparative analysis of pinning techniques for supracondylar humerus fractures in paediatrics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Purpose: Supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHFs) rank among the frequently observed fractures in children. Nonetheless, there exists a dearth of consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach. This meta-analysis aims to thoroughly evaluate and compare two distinct pinning techniques (cross pinning versus lateral pinning) for SCHFs, using data from Randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Literature review was done using PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing the two pinning methods and providing information on at least one of the following: Loss of Baumann's angle, loss of carrying angle, elbow function assessed based on Flynn criteria, pin tract infection, and iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Random effect model was used to calculate standardized mean difference or Odds Ratio (OR) for the outcomes. Review Manager 5.4.1. was used to perform quality assessment and statistical analysis. Results: A total of 22 RCTs were included. 20 studies reported data for iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury, the OR was calculated to be 3.76 (95% CI 1.75-8.06), showing a significantly lower risk of surgical ulnar nerve injury with the lateral technique. However, no significant difference was found between the pinning techniques in regard to the other outcomes. Conclusion: In comparison to lateral pinning, the utilization of cross pinning technique exposes the patient to a heightened susceptibility of iatrogenic nerve injury. Therefore, it is recommended that surgeons prioritize the implementation of the lateral pinning technique whenever feasible, as it offers greater protection against iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. For the other intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, both surgical techniques yield comparable results.

Unipolar Latissimus Dorsi Transfer for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Residual Post-traumatic Brachial Plexus Palsy Associated with Distal Humeral Fractures.

Introduction Elbow flexion is indispensable for both functioning and nonfunctioning hands. It is well perceived that restoration of elbow function is the first reconstructive priority in cases of brachial plexus injuries. The authors assessed the impact of associated distal humeral fractures on the functional outcome after unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer (ULDT) for restoration of elbow flexion in patients with residual brachial plexus palsy (BPP). Patients and Methods Twenty-three patients operated for restoring elbow flexion after residual post-traumatic BPP (with or without distal humeral fracture) by unipolar latissimus dorsi transfer (ULDT) were reviewed for a retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups; associated distal humeral fracture group (HF-group; 10 patients) and non-associated distal humeral fracture group (NHF-group; 13 patients). Elbow flexion active range of motion (AROM), flexion deformity in addition to Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were assessed. Results In both groups there were statistically better postoperative MEPS grading ( p = 0.007, p = 0.001 , respectively) and scoring with a mean of 81 ± 16.1 and 90 ± 4.6, respectively ( p < 0.001). The mean postoperative elbow flexion AROM was statistically better in both groups. The mean supination AROM was better in NHF group ( p = 0.057). Conclusion The use of ULDT in residual post-traumatic BPP is an efficient procedure in regaining functional flexion and supination. An associated distal humeral fracture does not significantly affect the final functional outcome. Level of Evidence Level IV.

Massive bone defects due to infection at the surgical site associated with a distal humeral fracture that was treated using fibula autograft: a case report.

Distal humerus fractures comprise between 2 and 5% of all fractures, and approximately one-third of all humerus fractures are of this type. In the present report, the authors described the massive bone defects due to infection at the surgical site associated with a distal humeral fracture that was treated using fibula autograft. Case presentation: A 28-year-old female patient experienced a fall from a height of 4 m and was referred to Poursina Educational and Medical Center. Clinical examinations and radiological imaging showed an open fracture of the right distal humerus. In the postoperative 50-day follow-up, the complication of infection at the surgical site causes bone loss of up to 8 cm. The posterior triceps-split approach (Campbell) to the distal humerus was used in this surgery. To evaluate the quality of surgery, standard radiographs of anteroposterior and lateral of the elbow joint and humeral shaft were performed after surgery. Clinical discussion: At 5 months postoperatively, the patient's initial results are good, and the range of motion of the elbow joint is ~10-120°. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, fibular transplantation in distal humerus fractures is considered one of the bone treatment options for repair.

Lateral para-olecranon approach: surgical guide and anatomical considerations to the anconeus branch: is there a nerve-free zone?

PURPOSE: In the last decades, total elbow arthroplasty, elbow osteosynthesis and revision surgery have been more popularized. The study aimed to assess the course of the anconeus branch of the radial nerve in relation to two variations of the lateral para-olecranon approach, considering iatrogenic nerve injuries. METHODS: The study consisted of 120 upper extremities from 60 Thiel-embalmed human specimens. Two randomized versions of the lateral para-olecranon approach (centrally orientated: P1 and laterally orientated: P2) were performed. The olecranon and the intersection points to the anconeus branch of the radial nerve were determined as anatomical landmarks. The measurements were assessed by two independent observers. Differences were analyzed using the Student's t test; associations were computed with the Pearson correlation (r). An alpha of 0.05 (p) and a confidence interval of 95% were set. RESULTS: The intersection points averaged 12.3 cm (SD 1.8, range 8.2-16.8) for P1 versus 5.5 cm (SD 1.4, range 3.0-9.2) for P2 (p ≤ 0.001). Statistically significantly higher values for male and longer humeral specimens were revealed (all values: p < 0.05). Comparison of left and right sides yielded no difference. Excellent inter-rater agreements were found (ICC = 0.902, range 0.860-0.921). A correlation was evaluated between the humeral length and the distances in both approaches (P1: r = 0.550, p < 0.001, P2: r = 0.669, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The data presented here allow preservation of the anconeus branch. The P1 forms a potential advantage by owing a broader safe zone. Using the centrally orientated approach seems to provide adequate nerve protection during surgery for one of the motor branches for extension of the elbow joint and might result in improved postoperative benefits.

Clinical comparison of double-plate fixation by the perpendicular plate method versus parallel plate method for distal humeral fracture: a multicenter (TRON group) study.

INTRODUCTION: Double-plating methods are popular, with perpendicular and parallel plate methods being widely used surgical method for the rigid fixation of distal humeral fracture (DHF). However, which plate method is better for DHF remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcomes including the incidences of complications and reoperation between the two plate methods. METHODS: We extracted 383 patients with DHF undergoing surgery between 2011 and 2020 from our multicenter database, which is named TRON. We divided the subjects into two groups: perpendicular plating group (Group A) and parallel plating group (Group B). To adjust for baseline differences between the groups, patients were matched for age, sex, olecranon osteotomy, AO type, and type of injury. We assessed the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at 3 and 6 months and the last follow-up month as the clinical outcome. We investigated the incidences of complications and reoperations in both groups. RESULTS: After matching, each group comprised 50 patients. There was no significant difference between Group A versus Group B in MEPS score at each time point. The incidence of implant removal in Group B was higher than that in Group A (26.5% vs 50%, p = 0.023). DISCUSSION: Although there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or complications between the two groups, the incidence of implant removal was higher in Group B than in Group A. In the parallel plate technique, where the plates have to be placed in areas with thin subcutaneous soft tissue, the incidence of implant removal might be high due to the discomfort caused by the implant.

AO/OTA type C3 distal humeral fractures in patients aged 75 years and older: Is ORIF with double precontoured anatomical locking plates a reliable treatment?

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of osteoporotic distal humeral fractures (DHF) is on the rise. Their operative management is demanding. Fixation with non-locking reconstruction plates was associate with a high number of complications. Elbow arthroplasty (total or hemi) has been proposed as an alternative treatment, in spite of lifetime activity restrictions, and risk of complications, unknown implant survival and problematic revision surgery. Precontoured anatomical locking plates have increased the strength of the fixation in complex fractures. HYPOTHESIS: double plating ORIF with precontoured anatomical locking plates is a safe and reliable treatment option for the management of AO/OTA type C3 DHF in patients aged 75 and older. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case series study of patients aged 75 years old and older with an AO/OTA type C3 DHF treated with ORIF with double precontoured anatomical locking plates between 2007 and 2021. Pathologic fractures were excluded. Patients' demographic, surgical, clinical, and radiological data were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 27 women and 3 men, mean age of 80.1 years (range 75-93 years), were included. Mean Charlson index was 5 (range 3-8). Out of 30 patients, 19 had already died. Mean survival time after the surgical treatment was 72.3 months. Mean Mayo elbow performance score was 88.9 (range 60-100); 23 patients scored excellent or good. All fractures healed with no cases of delay union or non-union, hardware failure or loss of reduction. No patient needed a revision surgery to arthroplasty. The total number of complications was 12 (40%), mainly ulnar neuropathy (5) and cerclage removal (4). CONCLUSION: ORIF with double pre-contoured locking plates may be a safe and reliable treatment for type C3 DHF in patients aged 75 years and older, with a good functional outcome. Complications are expected but not related to loss of reduction, fixation failure or revision to elbow arthroplasty.

Outcomes and complications after open reduction and internal fixation of distal humeral fractures with precontoured locking plates.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate functional and radiographic results after open reduction and internal fixation of distal humeral fractures using precontoured locking plates. Our main hypothesis was that patients older than 65 years have inferior outcomes compared with younger patients. Methods: All patients treated for a distal humeral fracture with precontoured locking plates between 2006 and 2017 at a level 1 trauma center were identified. Included patients underwent a clinical examination, and new radiographs were obtained. Functional outcomes were evaluated using Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, visual analog scale elbow satisfaction, and range of motion. Complications and reoperations were recorded. Results: Fifty-seven patients with a median age of 60 years were included in this study. Median Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was 14, and median Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 85. There was no difference in functional scores in patients younger than 65 years or 65 years or older. However, the median flexion-extension arc was 121 degrees in patients younger than 65 years and 111 degrees in patients 65 years or older (P = 0.01). The overall complication rate was 68%, and 24 patients had at least 1 reoperation. Ulnar neuropathy was the most common complication followed by reduced range of motion. Conclusions: Operative management of distal humeral fractures with precontoured locking plates provides good functional outcome. The patient-reported outcomes were good, independent of patient age. The implant failure rate is low with precontoured locking plates; however, the complication rate remains high, and reoperations are common. Level of Evidence: Level 4, retrospective study.

Comparison of Single-Plate and Double-Plate Osteosynthesis with Locking Plate Fixation for Distal Humeral Fracture in Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Management of transcondylar fracture of the humerus in older adults remains a challenging issue in trauma surgery. Both single- and double-plate fixation are used, and the best procedure is yet to be determined. This retrospective study evaluated and compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of single- and double-plate fixation for transcondylar humeral fracture. METHODS: This study included older adults (age >65 years) with transcondylar fractures of the humerus (AO/OTA 13A2-3; transverse, transmetaphyseal fracture) treated at our hospital between 2002 and 2019. The patients were divided into two groups based on the fixation procedures they underwent, namely, single (group S) or double (group D) locking plate osteosynthesis. Postoperative outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: Group S and group D comprised 11 (11 women) and 17 (2 men; 15 women) patients, respectively. In group S, the elbow was immobilized in a long-arm cast or splints for 2 weeks to prevent early displacement of fracture. Residual numbness of the ulnar digits was observed in two patients in group S and in nine patients in group D. No significant difference was noted between the two groups in the ratio of loss of reduction, loosening of the medial screw, ulnar nerve disturbance, or clinical outcomes. The ratio of elbow contracture significantly differed between 2 groups. The elbow flexion angle was significantly lower in group S. CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction and internal fixation with a double plate appears to be the optimal choice for early postoperative mobilization and maintenance of flexion and arc of the elbow joint.

Comparison of the Complications, Reoperations, and Clinical Outcomes between Open Reduction and Internal Fixation and Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Distal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Distal humeral fractures are challenging injuries seen in the elderly. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) are the gold standard treatments. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an alternative to ORIF. This study aimed to pool and analyze the outcomes and complications in elderly patients with distal humeral fractures treated with either ORIF or TEA by performing a meta-analysis. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that compared the clinical and functional outcomes of ORIF and TEA in patients aged 60 years or older. After screening and performing a quality assessment of the articles, we obtained one randomized control study and nine retrospective comparative studies. The odds ratio and standardized mean difference were used to analyze the differences in outcomes between the two surgical options. In terms of the flexion/extension arc, TEA produced significantly better outcomes than ORIF (p = 0.02). The rates of reoperation and elbow stiffness were significantly lower in the TEA group than in the ORIF group (p = 0.003 and p = 0.04, respectively). However, the functional scores and other ranges of motion (flexion, loss of extension, pronation, supination) after surgery were similar between the two groups. The outcomes from the present meta-analysis can provide guidance when selecting a surgical option for distal humeral fractures in the elderly.

Metaphyseal-diaphyseal Junctional Fractures of the Distal Humerus in Children: Two Case Series.

Introduction: Although there are few descriptions in textbooks and it is stated that the treatment of metaphyseal-diaphyseal junctional (MDJ) fracture is difficult, there is almost no detailed description on its treatment methods and precautions. Case Presentation: We encountered two patients, 9-year-old and 1-year and 11-month-old Japanese boys, with MDJ fractures of the distal humerus, which are very rare in children. Unlike supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus, the fractures were spiral fractures, which made percutaneous pinning very difficult. Open reduction was performed using a bilateral approach with two skin incisions. Both patients recovered completely and had no problems carrying out activities of daily living or playing sports. Conclusions: For patients that are old enough to receive a locking plate, we recommend fixation using a locking plate. In cases of unilateral pinning without cross-pinning, retrograde intramedullary nailing should be considered. MDJ fractures of the distal humerus should be treated as distal humeral shaft fractures, not as subtypes of supracondylar fractures of the humerus.

Hemiarthroplasty or total elbow arthroplasty for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in patients aged over 65 years : a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes and complications.

AIMS: Arthroplasty is being increasingly used for the management of distal humeral fractures (DHFs) in elderly patients. Arthroplasty options include total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA); both have unique complications and there is not yet a consensus on which implant is superior. This systematic review asked: in patients aged over 65 years with unreconstructable DHFs, what differences are there in outcomes, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), and complications, between distal humeral HA and TEA? METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed via a search of MEDLINE and Embase. Two reviewers extracted data on PROMs, ROM, and complications. PROMs and ROM results were reported descriptively and a meta-analysis of complications was conducted. Quality of methodology was assessed using Wylde's non-summative four-point system. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021228329). RESULTS: A total of 29 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) score was 19.6 (SD 7.5) for HA and 38 (SD 11.9) for TEA and the mean abbreviated version of DASH was 17.2 (SD 13.2) for HA and 24.9 (SD 4.8) for TEA. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was the most commonly reported PROM across included studies, with a mean of 87 (SD 5.3) in HA and 88.3 (SD 5) in TEA. High complication rates were seen in both HA (22% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5 to 44)) and TEA (21% (95% CI 13 to 30), but no statistically significant difference identified. CONCLUSION: This systematic review has indicated PROMs and ROM mostly favouring HA, but with a similarly high complication rate in the two procedures. However, due to the small sample size and heterogeneity between studies, strength of evidence for these findings is low. We propose further research in the form of a national randomized controlled trial. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):559-566.

Elbow arthroplasty is safe for the management of simple open distal humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Elbow arthroplasty (EA) is an established technique for the treatment of select distal humeral fractures, yet little data exists regarding the safety and outcome of EA in the presence of an open distal humeral fracture where the risk of periprosthetic infection is an even greater concern. We hypothesized that EA does not carry an increased risk of infection or other postoperative complications when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures. METHODS: Seventeen patients underwent total EA (n = 9) or hemiarthroplasty (n = 8) for an open distal humeral fracture. The open fracture component was classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Society system as "simple" or "complex." Outcome measures collected included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion, complications, and reoperations. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation were compared with those who underwent preliminary débridement procedures and subsequent staged arthroplasty. A systematic review of the existing literature was performed to analyze other reported cases and contextualize our findings. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 46 months (range, 12-138 months). All fractures were multifragmentary and intra-articular. Sixteen patients had a "simple" open fracture and 1 had a "complex" fracture. The overall mean MEPS was 83 (range, 30-100; standard deviation ± 17), with a mean flexion-extension arc of 96°. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation demonstrated a higher mean flexion arc (116° vs. 79°, P = .02) than those who underwent staged arthroplasty. The mean MEPS was not significantly different between the groups (90 vs. 78, P = .12). Complications included asymptomatic ulna component loosening (n = 1), joint instability (n = 1), and symptomatic heterotopic ossification (n = 3). There were no deep or superficial infections recorded. CONCLUSION: EA is safe and effective when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures. Primary débridement and implantation may offer functional benefits over a staged approach.

Olecranon Osteotomy by a Gigli Saw versus Chevron's Osteotomy for Exposure of Intra-articular Distal Humerus: A Comparative Study.

Introduction: Olecranon osteotomy is employed for the fixation of intraarticular distal humeral fractures. We conducted a prospective, randomised study comparing Chevron's osteotomy with olecranon osteotomy by a Gigli saw for exposure of the intraarticular distal humerus in terms of functional outcome and intra-operative ease of the surgery. Materials and methods: Thirty patients with skeletally mature AO/OTA type 13- B and 13-C distal humerus fractures were randomly allocated to Chevron's or Gigli saw groups. Each group consisted of a total of 15 patients. Both the groups were assessed on post-operative parameters including arm, shoulder or hand pain, ability to perform certain routine activities, tingling sensations and pain while sleeping. Results: In the Gigli saw group, 12 patients had no gross limitation of activity and 13 were able to perform moderate activities with ease. Similar results were observed in the Chevron's group. The mean difference between the two groups in Oxford Score was 0.60, within the 95% confidence interval and in line with QuickDASH-11 Score. Conclusion: Chevron's technique offers stability and better healing, providing a larger surface area for bone union. However, it is challenging and time-consuming. Also, literature suggests that the Gigli saw has multiple benefits, saves time and effort, and heals by switching blood supply from centrifugal to centripetal post-operatively. Our study suggests that both Chevron's technique and the use of the Gigli saw are effective in distal humeral intra-articular fractures as assessed by multiple parameters. Hence both techniques can be equally used depending on the surgeon's preference.

Biomechanical properties of a novel fixation system for intra-articular distal humerus fractures: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: The traditional strategy for fixing intra-articular distal humerus fractures is double plating placed in an orthogonal configuration, based on posterior approach. With a combined medial and lateral approach, a novel configuration of plating (combined anteromedial and anterolateral plating) has been used. In this study, we investigated the biomechanical properties of the novel plating by comparing it with some traditional strategies. METHODS: Based on the 3D morphology of a healthy subject's humerus, models of three types of intra-articular distal humeral fractures were established using a variety of different internal fixation methods: (a) treatment of a simple intra-articular fracture of the distal humerus with the novel double plate and a traditional orthogonal plate; (b) treatment of a comminuted fracture of the lower distal humerus with the novel double plate, a traditional orthogonal plate and a traditional orthogonal plate combined with distally extended tension screws; (c) treatment of a coronal shear fracture of the distal humerus with the novel double plate, a traditional orthogonal plate and the intra-articular placement of three screws. The material properties of all plates and screws were isotropic and linearly elastic. The Poisson ratio of the implant and bone was 0.3, and the elastic modulus of the implant was 114,000 MPa. The axial loading is 200 N, the bending loading is 30 N and varus rotation is 7.5 Nm in the longitudinal direction. RESULTS: A simple model of intra-articular fracture of the distal humerus (AO C1 type) was established. Under all experimental conditions, the novel double plate showed greater stiffness than the orthogonal double plate. The axial straightening, bending compression and varus torsion increased by 18.00%, 16.00% and 44.00%, respectively. In the model of comminuted fracture of the lower distal humerus, the novel double plate showed the best stiffness under three experimental conditions (163.93 N/mm, 37.97 N/mm, 2697.84 N mm/°), and the stiffness of the traditional orthogonal plate combined with the distally extended tension screws was similar to that of the traditional orthogonal plate (121.21 N/mm, 32.61 N/mm, 1968.50 N mm/°). In the model of coronal shear fracture of the distal humerus, the novel double plate showed the best stiffness under all test conditions (194.17 N/mm, 38.46 N/mm, 2929.69 N mm/°), followed by the traditional plate (153.85 N/mm, 33.33 N/mm, 2650.18 N mm/°), while the stiffness of the three screws was the smallest (115.61 N/mm, 28.30 N/mm, 2180.23 N mm/°). CONCLUSIONS: In terms of biomechanics, compared with other internal fixation methods, the novel combined anteromedial and anterolateral anatomical locking double-plate showed less stress, less displacement and greater stiffness. The novel double-plate method can be used to treat not only simple intra-articular fractures of the humerus but also complex comminuted fractures of the lower distal humerus and coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus, with a better effect than current traditional internal fixation methods.