Esofagitis disecante supeEsofagitis disecante superficial: dos casos de una misma entidad poco frecuente / Esophagitis dissecans superficialis: two cases of the same rare entity

La esofagitis disecante superficial (EDS) es una entidad infrecuente que se caracteriza endoscópicamente por el desprendimiento de las capas superficiales del epitelio esofágico e, histológicamente, por el aspecto bitonal del epitelio escamoso esofágico secundario a la necrosis de los estratos más superficiales. La etiología es desconocida, aunque se ha asociado con la ingesta de determinados fármacos, enfermedades autoinmunes, estasis esofágica y procedimientos endoscópicos. Presentamos dos casos: uno de ellos acontece en una mujer tras un episodio de disfagia abrupta y el segundo en un varón con comorbilidades y clínica de dolor epigástrico. La EDS es una patología que hay que considerar en su adecuado contexto clínico y endoscópico, ya que su curso es autolimitado en comparación con otras entidades de evolución tórpida o que precisan un tratamiento específico. (AU)

Esophagitis dissecans superficialis (EDS) is a rare disease characterized by sloughing of the superficial esophageal mucosa and, histologically, by the bitonal appearance of the squamous epithelium secondary to necrosis of the most superficial layers. Etiology is uncertain, however, it has been associated with some medications, autoimmune diseases, esophageal stasis and endoscopic procedures. Here, two cases are presented, one of them which appeared in a woman after an episode of dysphagia and another one which occurred to a man with comorbidities and epigastric pain. This entity should be considered due to its self-limiting clinical course, compared to other entities with a more torpid evolution or that require more specific treatment. (AU)

Vonoprazan causes symptomatic improvement in non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan therapy as compared to conventional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or no vonoprazan for non-erosive esophagitis. METHODS: A thorough search was conducted across databases. The primary outcome was to determine the mean variance in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) score after vonoprazan treatment. Secondary outcomes comprised alterations in the scores for epigastric pain and post-prandial distress, the proportion of patients displaying improvement, and the occurrence of adverse events. Pooled mean differences and relative risks were determined utilizing random effects models. RESULTS: A total of 1,944 articles were screened and nine of them were included. As compared to PPI or no vonoprazan therapy, vonoprazan treatment led to a significant reduction in the GERD score [mean difference: -3.88 (95 % CI: -5.48, -2.28), p < 0.01, i2=95 %]. As compared to PPI or no vonoprazan therapy, vonoprazan treatment led to a significant reduction in the epigastric pain score [mean difference: -3.02 (95 % CI: -5.41, -0.63), p = 0.01, i2=75 %] and post-prandial distress score [mean difference: -2.82 (95 % CI: -3.51, -2.12), p < 0.01, i2=0 %] (all moderate GRADE evidence). Vonoprazan therapy was found to be safe. CONCLUSION: Treatment with vonoprazan could significantly improve symptoms in patients with non-erosive esophagitis or non-erosive GERD.

Exploring X: barriers to care for eosinophilic esophagitis.

Patients with chronic diseases have increasingly turned to social media to discuss symptoms and share the challenges they face with disease management. The primary aim of this study is to use naturally occurring data from X (formerly known as Twitter) to identify barriers to care faced by individuals affected by eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). For this qualitative study, the X application programming interface with academic research access was used to search for posts that referenced EoE between 1 January 2019 and 10 August 2022. The posts were identified as being either related to barriers to care for EoE or not. Those related to barriers to care were further categorized by the type of barrier that was expressed. A total of 8636 EoE-related posts were annotated of which 12.1% were related to barriers to care in EoE. The themes that emerged about barriers to care included: dietary challenges, limited treatment options, lack of community support, lack of physician awareness of disease, misinformation, cost of care, lack of patient belief in disease or trust in physician, and limited access to care. Saturation of themes was achieved. This study highlights barriers to care in EoE using readily accessible social media data that is not derived from a curated research setting. Identifying these obstacles is key to improving care for this chronic disease.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Japan: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been increasingly diagnosed globally. However, there have been few general population-based studies in Asia. The aim of this study was to investigate EoE epidemiology in the Japanese general population. METHODS: We analyzed an employer-based health insurance claim database from January 2005 to September 2022. EoE cases were identified based on the International Classification of Diseases-tenth Revision code, K20.0. We calculated the incidence and prevalence of EoE using Poisson regression and binomial distribution, respectively. Using 10 matched controls for each EoE case, a nested case-control study was performed to identify potential risk factors for EoE. RESULTS: Of 15,200,895 individuals, 1,010 EoE cases were identified. The incidence and prevalence of EoE were 2.82 (95% CI 2.44-3.26) per 100,000 person-years and 10.68 (95% CI 10.01-11.37) per 100,000 people in 2022, nearly three and eight times as high as those in 2017, respectively. Smoking was associated with decreased risk of EoE (OR 0.45 (0.36 to 0.56), p<0.001) whereas alcohol consumption (OR 1.51 (1.21 to 1.88), p<0.001) were associated with increased risk of EoE along with several allergic conditions and psychiatric disorders. EoE was not related to either body mass index or lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, and dyslipidemia. CONCLUSION: The incidence and prevalence of EoE in Japan have steadily increased over the past two decades. Nevertheless, EoE remains less common in Japan compared to the United States and Western Europe. Factors contributing to the epidemiology of EoE on a global basis may improve our understanding of the contribution of genetic and environmental risk factors.

Causal relationship between eosinophilic esophagitis and inflammatory bowel disease: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are immune-mediated gastrointestinal diseases with overlapped pathogenesis and are sometimes concurrently diagnosed, but their causal relationship remains unclear. We investigated the causal relationship between EoE and IBD and its subtypes via a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Methods: MR analyses were performed using summary data of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on individuals of European ancestry. Independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms correlated with EoE (from a GWAS meta-analysis containing 1,930 cases and 13,634 controls) and IBD (from FinnGen GWASs containing 9,083 IBD, 2,033 CD, and 5,931 UC cases, and GWASs of IBD genetic consortium containing 12,882 IBD, 6,968 UC, and 5,956 CD cases) were selected as instruments. We applied the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as the primary analysis followed by several sensitivity analyses. For the forward MR study, estimates from IVW methods were subsequently meta-analyzed using a random-effect model. Results: Our results suggested a causal effect of EoE on IBD [pooled odds ratio (OR), 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.13] and EoE on UC (pooled OR, 1.09, 95% CI, 1.04-1.14). No causal link between EoE and CD was observed (pooled OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96-1.16). The reverse MR analyses revealed no causal effect of IBD (and its subtypes) on EoE. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of primary results. Conclusions: Our findings provided evidence of a suggestive causal effect of EoE on IBD (specifically on UC) in the European population. Increased awareness of concurrent or subsequent IBD in patients with EoE is called for. Still, the present evidence is not adequate enough and ought to be validated by further investigations.

Eosinophil Specialization Is Regulated by Exposure to the Esophageal Epithelial Microenvironment.

Distinct subsets of eosinophils are reported in inflammatory and healthy tissues, yet the functions of uniquely specialized eosinophils and the signals that elicit them, particularly in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), are not well understood. Herein, we report an ex-vivo system wherein freshly isolated human eosinophils were cocultured with esophageal epithelial cells and disease-relevant pro-inflammatory (IL-13) or pro-fibrotic (TGF-ß) cytokines. Compared with untreated cocultures, IL-13 increased expression of CD69 on eosinophils, whereas TGF-ß increased expression of CD81, CD62L, and CD25. Eosinophils from IL-13-treated cocultures demonstrated increased secretion of GRO-α, IL-8, and M-CSF and also generated increased extracellular peroxidase activity following activation. Eosinophils from TGF-ß-treated cocultures secreted increased IL-6 and exhibited increased chemotactic response to CCL11 compared with eosinophils from untreated or IL-13-treated coculture conditions. When eosinophils from TGF-ß-treated cocultures were cultured with fibroblasts, they upregulated SERPINE1 expression and fibronectin secretion by fibroblasts compared with eosinophils that were cultured with GM-CSF, alone. Translational studies revealed that CD62L was heterogeneously expressed by eosinophils in patient biopsies. Our results demonstrate that disease-relevant pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic signals present in the esophagus of EoE patients cause distinct profiles of eosinophil activation and gene expression.

Viral esophagitis in non-human immunodeficiency virus patients: a case-control study.

Background: Esophagitis, inflammation of the esophagus, can result from various causes, including reflux, infections, food allergies, medications, and trauma. Infectious esophagitis is the third most common cause after gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis worldwide. The primary causes of infectious esophagitis are candida esophagitis and viral esophagitis (VE) caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) or cytomegalovirus (CMV). VE is typically associated with immunosuppression, with risk factors such as malignancy, chemotherapy, organ transplant, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Infectious esophagitis is prevalent in about one-third of untreated acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients, but recent reports indicate an increase in VE cases among immunocompetent individuals. This study aims to explore risk factors and patient demographics in non-HIV individuals. Methods: A case-control study that included patients 18 years and older diagnosed with HSV or CMV esophagitis who were identified through histopathologic examination or immunohistochemical staining. Cases were obtained by searching pathology reports between 2009-2022 from five MedStar Health Hospitals in the District of Columbia and Maryland. Controls were selected based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with negative VE results within the same period. Patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, endoscopic findings, and potential risk factors were collected through chart review. Results: Out of 40,224 cases between 2009-2022, 50 cases of VE were identified, with 30 cases attributed to HSV, 19 cases to CMV, and one case of HSV/CMV coinfection. Hematemesis was the predominant symptom in patients with HSV (33%), while dysphagia was more prevalent in CMV patients (42%). The most common finding during EGD was ulceration in HSV patients (67%) and esophagitis in CMV patients (37%). Patients with VE had a higher likelihood of a history of immunosuppressive therapy, organ transplant, active malignancy, and systemic steroid use. However, a significant portion (34%) had no identifiable risk factors. Conclusions: The study's findings contribute to a better understanding of the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with VE in non-HIV patients. The identification of immunosuppression and specific risk factors can aid in early detection, appropriate management, and targeted interventions for VE. Further research is warranted to explore the rising incidence of VE in immunocompetent individuals and to optimize preventive strategies and treatment approaches for this condition.

Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have clinical benefits for treating several atopic diseases. However, consensus on its use for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is lacking. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of MAbs versus placebo for treating EoE. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes were changes in peak esophageal eosinophils count/high power field (HPF) and mean esophageal eosinophils count/HPF. The secondary outcomes were changes in the EoE-Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS), Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS), dysphagia score, and adverse events (AEs). We compared binary outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI). Considering the diversity of mechanistic properties of MAbs, a pre-specified subgroup analysis by MAb mechanism of action was performed for all outcomes, provided that at least two studies were in each subgroup. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. RESULTS: 6 RCTs were included (533 patients). Compared to placebo, MAbs led to a significant reduction in peak esophageal eosinophils count/HPF (MD -0.78; CI 95% -0.87, -0.6801) and mean esophageal eosinophils count/HPF (SMD -0.79; CI 95% -1.5, -0.08). Moreover, MAbs significantly reduced EoE-HSS scores (grade score: SMD -9.31; 95% CI -13.95, -4.6701; stage score: SMD -10.18; 95% CI -15.06, -5.31), EREFS (SMD -5.95; CI 95% -9.19, -2.71) and dysphagia score (SMD -1.79; CI 95% -3.36, -0.23) without increasing AEs compared to placebo. Among those MAbs whose mechanism of action includes the blockage of the receptor for IL-13 (Dupilumab, QAX576, and RPC4046), the scores of EoE-HSS grade, EoE-HSS stage, EREFS, and dysphagia were significantly reduced, and they presented a similar risk of overall and serious AEs compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: MAbs seem effective and safe in reducing esophageal eosinophil infiltrate, EoE-HSS score, EREFS score, and dysphagia symptoms in patients with EoE. However, further evidence is needed to establish its place in EoE management.

Characterization of lamina propria remodeling in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis using second harmonic generation microscopy.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by an intense infiltration of eosinophils into the esophageal epithelium. When not adequately controlled, eosinophilic inflammation can lead to changes in components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the lamina propria. Particularly, alterations to the collagen fiber matrix can lead to lamina propria fibrosis (LPF), which plays an important role in the fibrostenotic complications of EoE. Current approaches to assess LPF in EoE are prone to inter-observer inconsistencies and provide limited insight into the structural remodeling of the ECM. An objective approach to quantify LPF can eliminate inter-observer inconsistencies and provide novel insights into the fibrotic transformation of the lamina propria in EoE. Second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy is a powerful modality for objectively quantifying disease associated alterations in ECM collagen structure that is finding increasing use for clinical research. We used SHG with morphometric analysis (SHG-MA) to characterize lamina propria collagen fibers and ECM porosity in esophageal biopsies collected from children with active EoE (n = 11), inactive EoE (n = 11), and non-EoE (n = 11). The collagen fiber width quantified by SHG-MA correlated positively with peak eosinophil count (r = 0.65, p < 0.005) and histopathologist scoring of LPF (r = 0.52, p < 0.005) in the esophageal biopsies. Patients with active EoE had a significant enlargement of ECM pores compared to inactive EoE and non-EoE (p < 0.005), with the mean pore area correlating positively with EoE activity (r = 0.76, p < 0.005) and LPF severity (r = 0.65, p < 0.005). These results indicate that SHG-MA can be utilized to objectively characterize and provide novel insights into lamina propria ECM structural remodeling in children with EoE, which could aid in monitoring disease progression.

Real-world assessment of anaphylaxis and eosinophilic esophagitis with 12 SQ house dust mite SLIT-tablet sublingual immunotherapy.

Background: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with 12 SQ house dust mile SLIT-tablet (HDM SLIT-tablet) for dust mite-induced perennial allergic rhinitis is reported as effective and safe. Although serious allergic reactions (SARs) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have infrequently occurred under trial conditions, the safety of HDM SLIT-tablet challenge under real-world conditions is unknown. Objective: Our aim was to estimate the incidence of SARs and EoE due to HDM SLIT-tablet challenge. Methods: Through use of administrative data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California, this prospective observational study identified patients newly administered HDM SLIT-tablet with follow-up until SLIT discontinuation or end of study. Suspected cases of SARs and EoE were detected by using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, diagnosis and Current Procedural Terminology procedure codes and medication dispensing records. A 3-member clinical review committee of allergists adjudicated suspected reactions. The incidence rate of confirmed SARs and EoE per 1000 person years of exposure were determined. Results: A total of 521 patients (93.9% adult and 6.1% pediatric) were exposed to HDM SLIT-tablet challenge from January 2018 through May 2023, for 440.4 person years of exposure. The patients' average age (SD) was 39.3 (14.1) years, 58.7% were female, 44.3% were non-Hispanic White, 40.3% had asthma, and 15.0% had gastroesophageal reflux disease. A SAR occurred in 1 adult patient, and during initial HDM SLIT-tablet challenge, SARs occurred in 2 pediatric adolescents, for an overall incidence of 6.8 SARs per 1000 patient years (95% CI = 2.2-21.1). EoE occurred in 1 adult patient, for an overall incidence of 2.3 cases of EoE per 1000 patient years (95% CI = 0.3-16.1). Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrated that SARs and EoE were infrequent events with HDM SLIT-tablet use, supporting the safety of HDM SLIT-tablets and need for physician supervision with initial challenge.

Clinical and Molecular Correlates of the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: The Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) is a new expert-defined clinical tool that classifies disease severity of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether I-SEE is associated with patient characteristics and/or molecular features of EoE. METHODS: We analyzed a prospective cohort of patients with EoE from the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR). Associations between I-SEE and clinical and molecular features (EoE Diagnostic Panel [EDP]) were assessed. RESULTS: In 318 patients with chronic EoE (adults 209, children 109), the median total I-SEE score was 7.0, with a higher symptoms and complications score in children than adults (4.0 vs. 1.0; P < .001) and higher inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores in adults than children (3.0 vs. 1.0 and 3.0 vs. 0.0, respectively; both P < .001). Total I-SEE score had a bimodal distribution with the inactive to moderate categories and severe category. EDP score correlated with total I-SEE score (r = -0.352, P < .001) and both inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores (r = -0.665, P< .001; r = -0.446, P < .001, respectively), but not with symptoms and complications scores (r = 0.047, P = .408). Molecular severity increased from inactive to mild and moderate, but not severe categories. Longitudinal changes of modified I-SEE scores and inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores reflected the histologic and molecular activity. CONCLUSIONS: I-SEE associated with select clinical features across severity categories and with EoE molecular features for non-severe categories, warranting further validation.

Endoscopic reflux esophagitis and decline in pulmonary function in nonsmokers: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The association between reflux esophagitis and pulmonary function remains controversial. Thus, evaluating the relationship between endoscopic reflux esophagitis and changes in pulmonary function over time in a nonsmoking population is an important clinical issue. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, a medical examination database at Kameda Medical Center Makuhari was employed to identify nonsmokers who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and spirometry in 2010 and were followed up in 2015. Gastroenterologists carefully double-checked the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to compare the decline in the percentage of predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced vital capacity (%FVC), and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%FEV1) between participants with reflux esophagitis and those without. Furthermore, using multivariable logistic regression analyses, we evaluated the factors associated with rapid decline in %VC, %FVC, and %FEV1, which is defined as a decrease of >10% in each parameter over the 5-year observation period. RESULTS: We identified 3098 eligible subjects, including 72 and 44 participants who had a Los Angeles classification grade A and B-C (severe) reflux esophagitis in 2010, respectively. The decline in %VC was significantly larger in the participants with severe reflux esophagitis than in the control subjects (standardized coefficient, -0.037; 95% confidence interval, -0.071 to -0.004). Moreover, reflux esophagitis was significantly associated with a rapid decline in %VC and %FVC but not in %FEV1 (P for trend: 0.009, 0.009, and 0.276, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Severe reflux esophagitis among nonsmokers had clinical disadvantages in terms of a decline in %VC.

Causality of Helicobacter pylori infection on eosinophilic esophagitis and potential pathogenesis: a Mendelian randomization study.

Background: Observational studies have indicated a possible connection between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but their causal relationship has yet to be established. To investigate the causal associations between H. pylori infection and EoE, we performed a Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: Firstly, we conducted both univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. Furthermore, a two-step MR was carried out to ascertain the potential underlying pathways of these associations, particularly the involvement of inflammatory cytokines. We employed the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method as the main analysis in our MR study. To enhance the credibility of the results, we also conducted several sensitivity analyses. Results: Our study demonstrated a noteworthy correlation between genetically predicted anti-H. pylori IgG antibody levels and a reduced risk of EoE (OR=0.325, 95% CI=0.165-0.643, P value=0.004, adj p value=0.009). No significant causal associations were detected between other H. pylori antibodies and EoE in our study. When it comes to multivariable MR analysis controlling for education attainment, household income, and deprivation individually, the independent causal impact of anti-H. pylori IgG on EoE persisted. Surprisingly, the two-step MR analysis indicated that inflammatory factors (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-17, and IFN-γ) did not appear to mediate the protective effect of H. pylori infection against EoE. Conclusion: Findings suggested that among the range of H. pylori-related antibodies, anti-H. pylori IgG antibody is the sole causal factor associated with protection against EoE. Certain inflammatory factors may not be involved in mediating this association. These findings make a significant contribution to advancing our understanding of the pathogenesis of EoE and its evolving etiology.

Non-epithelial Gene Expression Correlates with Symptom Severity in Adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: The mechanistic basis of the variable symptomatology seen in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We examined the correlation of a validated, patient-reported outcome (PRO) metric with a broad spectrum of esophageal transcripts to uncover potential symptom pathogenesis. METHODS: Data were extracted from 146 adults with EoE through the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR). Patients were subgrouped by esophageal dilation history. We compared a validated PRO metric, the EoE Activity Index (EEsAI), with a set of transcripts expressed in the esophagus of patients with EoE, the EoE Diagnostic Panel (EDP). We utilized single-cell RNA sequencing data to identify the cellular source of EEsAI-related EDP genes and further analyzed patients with mild and severe symptoms. RESULTS: The EEsAI correlated with the EDP total score, especially in patients without recent esophageal dilation (r = -0.31, P = .003). We identified 14 EDP genes that correlated with EEsAI scores (r ≥ 0.3, P < .05). Of these, 11 were expressed in non-epithelial cells and 3 in epithelial cells; during histologic remission, only 4/11 (36%) non-epithelial versus 3/3 (100%) epithelial genes had decreased expression to <50% of that in active EoE. Fibroblasts expressed 5/11 (45%) non-epithelial EEsAI-associated EDP genes. A subset of non-epithelial (8/11, 73%), but not EoE-representative (0/4, 0%; CCL26, CAPN14, DSG1, SPINK7), genes was upregulated in patients with EoE with the highest versus lowest symptom burden. CONCLUSION: The correlation of symptoms and non-epithelial esophageal gene expression substantiates that non-epithelial cells (e.g., fibroblasts) likely contribute to symptom severity.

The modern face of esophageal candidiasis in an oncology center: Correlating clinical manifestations, endoscopic grade, and pathological data in 323 contemporary cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical presentation and outcomes of esophageal candidiasis (EC) in cancer patients are scarcely studied in the azole era, as is the correlation between clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological EC manifestations. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of pathology-documented EC cases at MD Anderson Cancer Center. We further assessed associations between presence of symptoms, standardized 4-stage endoscopic grade (Kodsi classification), histopathological data, and fluconazole treatment failure. RESULTS: Among 323 cancer patients with EC, 89% had solid tumors, most commonly esophageal cancer (29%). Thirty-three percent of EC patients were asymptomatic. The proportion of symptomatic EC patients significantly increased with endoscopic grade (P = 0.005). Among 202 patients receiving oral fluconazole, 27 (13%) had treatment failure. Underlying esophageal disease was the only independent predictor of fluconazole treatment failure (odds ratio: 3.88, P = 0.005). Endoscopic grade correlated significantly with Candida organism burden (Correlation coefficient [ρ] = 0.21, P < 0.01) and neutrophilic inflammation (ρ = 0.18, P < 0.01). Candida invasion of the squamous mucosal layer was associated with treatment failure (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: EC was predominantly encountered in patients with solid tumors. One-third of EC patients were asymptomatic, challenging traditional symptom-based diagnosis. The development of integrated clinicopathological scoring systems could further guide the therapeutic management of cancer patients with EC.

Can diet change the natural history of gastrointestinal diseases?

Belatedly, gastroenterologists have begun to pay attention to the role of diet in the exacerbation of gastrointestinal symptoms in many digestive disorders-a recognition that has spurred both high-quality clinical trials and translational research into this area. It has become clear that multiple mechanisms acting either in isolation or together can induce gut symptoms and that appropriate interventions can lead to significant relief. What this review will explore is not the role of diet in the production of certain symptoms or symptom clusters, but rather whether a dietary intervention can beneficially alter the natural history of a gastrointestinal disease-a much more demanding expectation. Yet there are examples of where a diet, if sustained, can have a long-term impact on at least some of those affected by conditions such as eosinophilic esophagitis, celiac disease, food allergy, and constipation.

Challenging assumptions about the demographics of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases: A systematic review.

Background: The demographic characteristics of patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are poorly understood. Population-based assessments of EGID demographics may indicate health disparities in diagnosis. Objectives: We aimed to characterize the demographic distribution of EGIDs and evaluate the potential for bias in reporting patient characteristics. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, extracting data on age, sex, gender, race, ethnicity, body mass index, insurance, and urban/rural residence on EGID patients and the source population. Differences in proportions were assessed by chi-square tests. Demographic reporting was compared to recent guidelines. Results: Among 50 studies that met inclusion/exclusion criteria, 12 reported ≥1 demographic feature in both EGID and source populations. Except for age and sex or gender, demographics were rarely described (race = 4, ethnicity = 1, insurance = 1) or were not described (body mass index, urban/rural residence). A higher proportion of male subjects was observed for EoE or esophageal eosinophilia relative to the source population, but no difference in gender or sex distribution was observed for other EGIDs. "Sex" and "gender" were used interchangeably, and frequently only the male proportion was reported. Reporting of race and ethnicity was inconsistent with guidelines. Conclusion: Current data support a male predominance for EoE only. Evidence was insufficient to support enrichment of EGIDs in any particular racial, ethnic, or other demographic group. Population-based studies presenting demographics on both cases and source populations are needed. Implementation of guidelines for more inclusive reporting of demographic characteristics is crucial to prevent disparities in timely diagnosis and management of patients with EGIDs.

Epidemiology and Racial Differences of EoE Patients in a U.S. Veterans Population.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is increasing in prevalence but there is a lack of population-based studies. We sought to determine the prevalence, demographics, and associated atopic diseases in the Veterans Affairs (VA) population. METHODS: A nationwide analysis of data from the VA patient population was done using a Veterans Health Administration database. EoE was identified using ICD9 (530.13) and ICD10 (K20.0) codes from October 2008 to June 2020. Demographic data, smoking status, BMI, treatment, and ICD codes for atopic diagnoses were collected. Two sample proportion z-tests, Chi-square tests, two-sample t tests, and one-way ANOVA were used to assess associations across demographic categories. RESULTS: We identified a total of 11,775 patients with an EoE diagnosis: 91% male, 83% White, 8.6% Black, and 5% were of Hispanic ethnicity. The prevalence of EoE increased over time. At diagnosis, the mean age was 48.5 years overall, 51.6 years for Black patients, 45.3 years for Hispanic patients, and 48.2 years for Whites. Dysphagia was the most common symptom overall, but a higher percentage of Blacks and females were found to report chest pain (p < 0.0001, h = 0.32). With the exception of urticaria and atopic dermatitis, both Blacks and Hispanics had a higher incidence of atopic conditions compared to other races and ethnicities (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: While EoE is seen primarily in White males, our study shows that a notable percentage of patients were Black or Hispanic, suggesting that EoE should be considered in non-white patients. The later age of diagnosis in this group could represent a lack of awareness about EoE among non-white patients. More research is needed to study these associations.