Femoral shaft displacement and Winquist classification provide predictive characteristics for combined femoral neck and femoral shaft fractures.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study is to establish radiographic features and characteristics of patient injury in cases of femoral shaft fractures that predict the presence of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures (IFNFs). METHODS: Patient data was retrospectively assessed from a single level I trauma center through the electronic health record using (Current Procedural Terminology) CPT codes for both isolated and combined ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fractures. Demographic information, injury characteristics, and independently reviewed radiographic features were collected and compared against the same information from a group of isolated femoral shaft fractures. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for concomitant IFNFs and their respective odds ratios. A probability algorithm for assessing ipsilateral femoral neck fractures based on independent multivariate predictors was constructed and used. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients with either isolated femoral shaft fractures or combined femoral shaft and IFNF (n = 33) met inclusion criteria and were identified for this study. Fracture displacement was most strongly associated with increased risk of combined injury with an aOR of 25.64 (95 %CI = 5.96-110.28) for every 100 % displacement. Motorcycle crash (MCC) was the mechanism associated with the highest risk of combined injury, with an aOR of 9.85 (95 % CI = 1.99-48.74). Combined injury was also correlated with lower Winquist score and presentation with a closed fracture, with aORs of 0.38 (95 %CI = 0.21 - 0.68) and 11.61 (95 %CI = 1.93-69.94), respectively. Presence of at least 3 of the statistically significant variables produced a positive predictive value (PPV) of ≥ 89 % for combined femoral shaft and IFNF. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of combined femoral shaft and IFNF is of critical importance when caring for orthopedic trauma patients. While diagnosis remains a challenging task, MCC mechanism, >100 % fracture displacement, and lower Winquist classification were found to be associated with combined injuries. The combination of these variables might assist in predicting the probability of combined injury and potentially guide decision making on the appropriateness of obtaining single sequence MRI or implementing prophylactic femoral neck fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Exploration of the Clinical Effect of Different Autotransfusion Methods on Patients With Femoral Shaft Fracture Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical effect of predeposit, salvage, and hemodilution autotransfusion on patients with femoral shaft fracture (FSF) surgery. METHODS: Selected patients with FSF were randomly divided into three groups: intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion, preoperative hemodilution autohemotransfusion, and predeposit autotransfusion. Five days after the operation, the body temperature, heart rate, blood platelet (PLT), and hemoglobin (Hb) of patients were determined. The concentrations of EPO and GM-CSF in the three groups were calculated by ELISA. The content of CD14+ monocytes was calculated by FCM assay. The growth time and condition of the patient's callus were determined at the 30th, 45th, and 60th day after operation. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between EPO, GM-CSF, CD14+ mononuclear content, callus growth, and autotransfusion methods. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in body temperature and heart rate between the three groups (p > 0.05). PLT and Hb in the Predeposit group were markedly increased compared with that in the Salvage and Hemodilution groups. The concentrations of EPO and GM-CSF in the Predeposit group were markedly increased compared with that in the Salvage and Hemodilution groups. The content of CD14+ monocytes in the Predeposit group was significantly higher than that in the Salvage and Hemodilution groups. Predeposit autotransfusion promotes callus growth more quickly. CONCLUSION: Predeposit autotransfusion promoted the recovery of patients with FSF after the operation more quickly than salvage autotransfusion and hemodilution autotransfusion.

Comparing outcomes of plate augmentation, nail exchange, and nail exchange with plate augmentation in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing: a multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures, but nonunion rates have been reported to be as high as 12%. Surgical interventions for nonunion involve exchange nailing or plate augmentation. Recently, a combined treatment of exchange nailing and plate augmentation has demonstrated good results, but its comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different surgical interventions for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion, and investigate the factors that affect bone healing after reoperation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at five university hospitals involving 149 patients with aseptic atrophic nonunion after IM nailing. These patients underwent reoperation with plate augmentation, exchange nailing, or combined treatment. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed and compared according to reoperation procedure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting persistent nonunion after reoperation. RESULTS: Of the cohort, 57 patients underwent plate augmentation, 64 underwent exchange nailing, and 28 received combined treatment. There were no significant differences in patient demographics among the groups. Exchange nailing produced a significantly lower union rate than did the combined treatment (82.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.016), whereas no significant difference was observed in the union rate and time to the union between plate augmentation and the combined treatment. Combined treatment showed the longest operative time and the greatest transfusion requirements. The risk factors for persistent nonunion included age, absence of autogenous bone grafts, and use of an exchange nailing technique. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange nailing as a treatment for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing resulted in a lower union rate. The efficacy of the combined treatment requires further study, and persistent nonunion may be influenced by age, bone grafting, and surgical techniques. A comprehensive approach targeting both biological environment and mechanical stability is crucial in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion.

Pediatric femoral shaft fracture requiring revision surgery for nonunion associated with vitamin D and K deficiencies: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Nonunion of femoral shaft fractures in children is rare, and there is no clear treatment protocol. In this case report, a pediatric femoral shaft fracture that developed in nonunion due to vitamin deficiency after osteosynthesis, which was successfully treated with vitamin augmentation and replacement with a rigid antegrade intramedullary nail, is described. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient is an 11-year-old Japanese girl. She injured her right femoral shaft fracture when she hit a wall after kickboarding down a hill and underwent osteosynthesis with a titanium elastic nail. Six months postoperatively, she developed nonunion, was found to be deficient in vitamins D and K, and was started on vitamin supplementation. She underwent replacement with a rigid antegrade intramedullary nail at 7 months postoperatively, and bone union was achieved 3 months after reoperation. CONCLUSION: When delayed union of a fracture is observed postoperatively, even in children without underlying disease, the cause of the problem must be investigated and treated promptly.

Effect of postoperative fracture gap on bone union: A retrospective cohort analysis of simple femoral shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is considered the gold-standard treatment for femoral shaft fractures. The post operative fracture gap is commonly recognized as a risk factor for nonunion. However, no evaluation standard for measuring the fracture gap size has yet been established. In addition, the clinical implications of the fracture gap size have also not been determined so far. This study aims to clarify how we should evaluate fracture gaps when assessing simple femoral shaft fractures with radiographs and to determine the acceptable cut-off value of the fracture gap size in simple femoral shaft fractures. METHOD: A retrospective observational study with a consecutive cohort was conducted at the trauma center of a university hospital. We investigated the fracture gap using postoperative radiography and the postoperative bone union of transverse and short oblique femoral shaft fractures fixed by IMN. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to obtain the fracture gap's mean, minimum, and maximum cut-off values. Fisher's exact test was used at the cut-off value of the most accurate parameter. RESULTS: In the four nonunions among the 30 cases, the analysis using ROC curves revealed that the maximum value had the highest accuracy among the maximum, minimum, and mean values of fracture-gap size. The cut-off value was determined to be 4.14 mm with high accuracy. Fisher's exact test showed that the incidence of nonunion was higher in the group with a maximum fracture gap of 4.14 mm or greater (risk ratio = not applicable, risk difference = 0.57, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In simple transverse and short oblique femoral shaft fractures fixed with IMN, the fracture gap on radiographs should be evaluated by the maximum gap in the AP and lateral views. The remaining maximum fracture gap of ≥4.14 mm would be a risk factor for nonunion.

Comparing pediatric femoral shaft fracture repair patient outcomes between pediatric and non-pediatric orthopedic surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: While pediatric femoral shaft fractures account for less than 2% of all fractures in children, they are the most common pediatric fracture requiring hospitalization. Management of pediatric femoral shaft fractures is challenging, with various treatment options relating to severity and patient age. The last few decades have seen an increased supply of pediatric orthopedic surgeons (POS) along with increased referral rates. However, there continues to be a maldistribution of POS throughout the country. This study sought to determine outcomes following femoral shaft fracture repair by POS compared to non-pediatric trained orthopedic surgeons. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database was queried to identify pediatric patients who underwent open treatment of femoral shaft fracture from 2012 to 2019. Differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were assessed and compared between patients who were treated by pediatric subspecialty-trained orthopedic surgeons and those treated by non-pediatric orthopedic surgeons. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were utilized. RESULTS: Of the 5862 pediatric patients who underwent femoral shaft fracture treatment, 4875 (83.2%) had their surgeries performed by a POS whereas 987 (16.8%) were operated on by a non-pediatric surgeon. POS were more likely to operate on patients with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p < 0.001) and those with medical comorbidities, including gastrointestinal (p = 0.022) and neurological (p < 0.001). After controlling for baseline patient characteristics on multivariable regression analysis, patients treated by non-pediatric orthopaedic surgeons are at an increased risk of prolonged hospital stay (OR 2.595; p < 0.001) when compared to patients operated on by POS. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that patients undergoing surgical treatment for a femoral shaft fracture by a non-pediatric trained orthopedic surgeon were at increased risk of a prolonged hospital stay compared to those being treated by POS. Additionally, POS were more likely to operate on more difficult patients with increased comorbidities.

Capsular distension in high-energy femoral shaft fractures is associated with occult femoral neck fracture: a preliminary retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between hip capsular distension, the computed tomography (CT) capsular sign, and lipohemarthrosis as they relate to occult femoral neck fracture (FNF) in the setting of ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture (FSF). DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-two patients with high-energy FSF and no evidence of FNF on preoperative radiographs and pelvis CT. All patients were stabilized with non-reconstruction style nails. INTERVENTION: Pelvis CT scans were examined for hip capsular distension irrespective of the other side, differing side-to-side measurements of capsular distension (i.e., the CT capsular sign), and lipohemarthrosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: FNF was observed for on postoperative radiographs. Relative risk (RR), number needed to treat (NNT), sensitivity (SN), and specificity (SP) were determined. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (24.0%) had capsular distension. Forty-two patients (17.4%) had differing capsular measurements (i.e., the CT capsular sign), and 16 (6.6%) had symmetrical distension from bilateral hip effusions. Eight patients (3.3%) had lipohemarthrosis. Four FNFs (1.7%) were identified. Three patients had capsular distension, 2 had CT capsular signs, and 1 had lipohemarthrosis. The last patient had no CT abnormalities. Only capsular distension (RR = 10, CI = 1.001-90, P = 0.049; SN = 75%, SP = 77%; NNT = 22) and lipohemarthrosis (RR = 23, CI = 1.6-335, P = 0.022; SN = 50%, SP = 96%; NNT = 8) were associated with occult FNF. CONCLUSIONS: Capsular distension is associated with FNF irrespective of the contralateral hip. Preemptive stabilization using a reconstruction nail could be considered in the setting of capsular distension or lipohemarthrosis to prevent displacement of an occult FNF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III.

Surgical Treatments for Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Narrative Review.

Femoral shaft fractures are increasingly common due to various traumatic injuries. Intramedullary nail (IMN) is considered the gold standard treatment for these fractures, but comorbidities often require thorough trauma life support and intensive care. The primary goal of treatment is rigid fixation, early mobilisation, and long-term functional recovery. This article reviews current concepts in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, including the effects of early or delayed operation, differences between antegrade or retrograde intramedullary nailing, alternative methods to using a fracture table, methods to predict nail length before operation, assessing femoral rotation during an operation, and complications.

Submuscular plating vs. elastic stable intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal femur fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: This review evaluates the safety and efficacy of submuscular plating (SMP) vs. elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in the treatment of pediatric femur shaft fracture. Method: Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of SMP and ESIN in pediatric shaft fracture were retrieved from five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, OVID, and Web of Science) from inception to March 2023 using a systematic literature search strategy. A total of 13 outcome measures, such as perioperative parameters, clinical outcomes, and radiographic results, were included in the meta-analysis. Results: Eight eligible studies involving 491 patients were included in the narrative synthesis. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Meta-analysis showed reduced radiation time (RT), soft tissue irritation and angular deformation in the SMP group than in the ESIN group. However, the SMP group had greater estimated blood loss (EBL) than the ESIN group. The duration of surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS), implant removal, complications requiring surgery, Flynn score, incidence of infection, fracture healing time, and limb length discrepancy (LLD) were similar between the two groups. Only one study reported higher incidences of fracture nonunion or delayed healing in the ESIN group. Conclusion: SMP is an effective and safe intervention superior to ESIN in reducing soft tissue irritation, angular deformation and radiation time. Given the presence of potential bias and heterogeneity, surgeons should select the treatment that would provide the best outcomes for EBL, LOS, operation time, and bone nonunion or delayed healing based on their experience. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023404118, Identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021228512).

Trends in incidence, health care consumption, and medical and productivity costs of femoral shaft fractures in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2019.

INTRODUCTION: Population-based knowledge on the occurrence of femoral shaft fractures is necessary for allocation of health care services, optimization of preventive measures, and research purposes. This nationwide study aimed to provide an overview on the incidence of femoral shaft fractures over a 15-year period and to gain insight into health care consumption and work absence with associated costs in the Dutch population. METHODS: Data of patients who sustained an acute femoral shaft fracture in the years 2005-2019 were extracted from the National Medical Registration of the Dutch Hospital Database. The incidence rate, hospital length of stay (HLOS), direct medical costs, productivity costs, and years lived with disability were calculated for age- and gender specific groups. RESULTS: A total of 15,847 patients with a femoral shaft fracture were included. The incidence rate increased with 13 % over this 15-year period (5.71/100,000 persons per year in 2005 and 6.47/100,000 in 2019). The mean HLOS per patient was 13.8 days in 2005-2009 versus 8.4 days in 2015-2019 for the entire group. Mean HLOS per patient increased with age (10.0 days for age group 0-9 and 12.7 days for age group >80), but declined over time from 13.6 days in 2005-2009 to 8.8 days in 2015-2019 in males, and from 13.7 days and to 8.2 days, respectively, in females. The costs due to work absence was higher in males. Cumulative health care costs were highest in females >80 years (8.4 million euros versus 1.6 million in males). CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of femoral shaft fractures increased over the past 15 years in the Netherlands. Mean HLOS per patient has decreased in all age groups and in both sexes. Health care costs were highest for female octogenarians.

Clinical versus radiological method for adjusting rotational alignment during femoral shaft fractures intramedullary nailing and the malrotation impact on the functional outcomes: early results from a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the current study is to assess which is better for obtaining the proper femoral rotation during IMN of femoral fractures, the radiological or clinical method. The secondary objectives were to document malrotation's incidence and its effect on the hip and knee functional outcomes. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with unilateral femoral shaft fractures were treated using intramedullary nails (IMN) on a usual radiolucent operative table. Intraoperative rotation adjustment was performed using a radiological method (relying on the contralateral lesser trochanter profile) in 16 patients (group A), while in 17 patients, a clinical method was used (group B). Postoperative assessment of malrotation was performed using a CT scan, and 15 degrees was the cutoff value where below is an acceptable rotation (group I) and above is true malrotation (group II). Functional assessment was performed using the Harris hip score (HHS), the Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (TLKSS), and the Neer score. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 30.7 ± 9.3 years; 81.8% were males, and the left side was injured in 63.6% of patients. After a mean follow up of 18.2 ± 6.9 months, all fractures were united, and the overall mean amount of rotational difference between the fractured and the contralateral side was 14.7° ± 6.0 (3-29.4), 84.8% were in external rotation. No difference in the mean rotational deformity in group A compared to group B. Measurements were 13.9 ± 6.7 and 15.7 ± 5.5, respectively (p = 0.47). Seventeen (51.5%) patients in group I with a mean deformity of 9.8 ± 3.4 (3-14.7), while group II consisted of 16 (48.5%) patients with a mean deformity of 19.6 ± 3.7 (15.3-29.4). There was no difference in the functional scores between group I and group II; HHS was 89.4 ± 7.4 versus 87.7 ± 8.9 (p = 0.54), TLKSS was 84.6 ± 9.6 versus 80.4 ± 13.9 (p = 0.32), and Neer score was 87.9 ± 9.5 versus 83 ± 12.5 (p = 0.21) for group I and group II, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in malrotation incidence after unilateral femoral fractures IMN with either an intraoperative clinical or radiological method for rotational adjustment; furthermore, malrotation did not affect the functional outcomes.

Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures: Results of two treatment strategies / Fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur: resultados de 2 estrategias de tratamiento

Introduction: Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures typically occur in young adults after high-energy trauma. No consensus exists regarding the optimal internal fixation device or surgical strategy for these complex fractures. Our main objective is to identify differences on outcomes and complications between patients treated with one or combined implants. Material and method: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with associated fractures of the proximal (31 AO) and shaft femur (32 AO). We divided the patients into two groups according to the use of single (Group I) or combined implants (Group II). Demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical data and development of complications were collected.Results: We identified 28 patients (19 men and 9 women) with an average age of 43 years. We used an anterograde femoral nail in group I (17 patients) and a retrograde femoral nail or a plate associated with hip lag screws or sliding hip screw in Group II (11 patients). Patients were followed up for 26.28 (9.12–62.88) months. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis, infection or nonunion was found in 9 patients (32%). No significant differences (p 0.70) were found in complications between two groups or between definitive surgical fixation before or after the first 24h. Conclusions: No differences in the development of complications or timing of definitive fixation were found between the use of one or combined implants in ipsilateral proximal femur and shaft fractures. Regardless of the implant chosen, an appropriate osteosynthesis technique is crucial, even so high complication rates are expected.

Introducción: Las fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur suelen ocurrir en adultos jóvenes después de un traumatismo de alta energía. No existe consenso sobre el dispositivo de fijación interna óptimo o la estrategia quirúrgica para estas fracturas complejas. Nuestro principal objetivo es identificar las diferencias en los resultados y complicaciones entre los pacientes tratados con un implante o combinados. Material y método: Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo unicéntrico en pacientes con fracturas asociadas del fémur proximal (31 AO) y diafisarias (32 AO). Dividimos a los pacientes en 2 grupos según el uso de implantes únicos (grupo i) o combinados (grupo ii). Se recogieron datos demográficos, clínicos, radiológicos, quirúrgicos y complicaciones. Resultados: Se identificaron 28 pacientes (19 hombres y 9 mujeres) con una edad promedio de 43 años. Utilizamos un clavo femoral anterógrado en el grupo i (17 pacientes) y un clavo femoral retrógrado o una placa con tornillos a compresión o tornillo deslizante de cadera en el grupo ii (11 pacientes). Los pacientes fueron seguidos durante 26,28 (9,12-62,88) meses. Se encontró osteonecrosis de la cabeza femoral, osteoartritis, infección o seudoartrosis en 9 pacientes (32%). No se encontraron diferencias significativas (p=0,70) en las complicaciones entre los 2 grupos o entre la fijación quirúrgica definitiva antes o después de las primeras 24h. Conclusiones: No se encontraron diferencias en el desarrollo de complicaciones o el momento de la fijación definitiva entre el uso de un implante o combinado en fracturas ipsilaterales de fémur proximal y diafisario. Independientemente del implante elegido, una técnica de osteosíntesis adecuada es crucial; aun así son esperables altas tasas de complicaciones.(AU)

[Artículo traducido] Fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur: resultados de dos estrategias de tratamiento / Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures: Results of two treatment strategies

Introduction: Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures typically occur in young adults after high-energy trauma. No consensus exists regarding the optimal internal fixation device or surgical strategy for these complex fractures. Our main objective is to identify differences on outcomes and complications between patients treated with one or combined implants. Material and method: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with associated fractures of the proximal (31 AO) and shaft femur (32 AO). We divided the patients into two groups according to the use of single (Group I) or combined implants (Group II). Demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical data and development of complications were collected.Results: We identified 28 patients (19 men and 9 women) with an average age of 43 years. We used an anterograde femoral nail in group I (17 patients) and a retrograde femoral nail or a plate associated with hip lag screws or sliding hip screw in Group II (11 patients). Patients were followed up for 26.28 (9.12–62.88) months. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis, infection or nonunion was found in 9 patients (32%). No significant differences (p 0.70) were found in complications between two groups or between definitive surgical fixation before or after the first 24h. Conclusions: No differences in the development of complications or timing of definitive fixation were found between the use of one or combined implants in ipsilateral proximal femur and shaft fractures. Regardless of the implant chosen, an appropriate osteosynthesis technique is crucial, even so high complication rates are expected.

Introducción: Las fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur suelen ocurrir en adultos jóvenes después de un traumatismo de alta energía. No existe consenso sobre el dispositivo de fijación interna óptimo o la estrategia quirúrgica para estas fracturas complejas. Nuestro principal objetivo es identificar las diferencias en los resultados y complicaciones entre los pacientes tratados con un implante o combinados. Material y método: Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo unicéntrico en pacientes con fracturas asociadas del fémur proximal (31 AO) y diafisarias (32 AO). Dividimos a los pacientes en 2 grupos según el uso de implantes únicos (grupo i) o combinados (grupo ii). Se recogieron datos demográficos, clínicos, radiológicos, quirúrgicos y complicaciones. Resultados: Se identificaron 28 pacientes (19 hombres y 9 mujeres) con una edad promedio de 43 años. Utilizamos un clavo femoral anterógrado en el grupo i (17 pacientes) y un clavo femoral retrógrado o una placa con tornillos a compresión o tornillo deslizante de cadera en el grupo ii (11 pacientes). Los pacientes fueron seguidos durante 26,28 (9,12-62,88) meses. Se encontró osteonecrosis de la cabeza femoral, osteoartritis, infección o seudoartrosis en 9 pacientes (32%). No se encontraron diferencias significativas (p=0,70) en las complicaciones entre los 2 grupos o entre la fijación quirúrgica definitiva antes o después de las primeras 24h. Conclusiones: No se encontraron diferencias en el desarrollo de complicaciones o el momento de la fijación definitiva entre el uso de un implante o combinado en fracturas ipsilaterales de fémur proximal y diafisario. Independientemente del implante elegido, una técnica de osteosíntesis adecuada es crucial; aun así son esperables altas tasas de complicaciones.(AU)

Accelerated fixation is associated with fewer pulmonary embolism in patients with isolated and unilateral femoral shaft fractures: A TQIP analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal time to intramedullary internal fixation for patients with isolated and unilateral femoral shaft fractures was investigated by the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients from the TQIP between 2017 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. The associations between time to fixation and target outcomes (pulmonary embolism [PE], deep vein thrombosis [DVT], acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS], and mortality) were assessed. Maximization of the sum of sensitivity and specificity was used to determine the optimal cut point. The patients were divided into three groups according to different time to fixation intervals. A multinomial propensity scores weighting using generalized boosted models was performed for all unbiased pre-treatment factors between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to clarify the outcomes predictors. RESULTS: The univariate and multivariate analysis before weighting showed that only PE was significantly associated with time to fixation (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.09; p = 0.012). The optimal cut point of time to fixation was 13.88 h. The patients were divided into accelerated (≤ 13.88 h), standard (> 13.88 and ≤ 24 h), and delayed (> 24 and < 36 h) groups. After weighting for all unbiased pre-treatment factors between the groups, multivariate logistic regression showed that standard group significantly increased the risk of PE compared with accelerated group (OR, 4.436; 95% CI, 1.844-10.672; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Accelerated intramedullary internal fixation within 13.88 h was associated with a significantly decreased risk of PE compared with standard fixation in patients with isolated and unilateral femoral shaft fractures without additional mortality risks.

Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures: Results of two treatment strategies. / [Artículo traducido] Fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur: resultados de dos estrategias de tratamiento.

INTRODUCTION: Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures typically occur in young adults after high-energy trauma. No consensus exists regarding the optimal internal fixation device or surgical strategy for these complex fractures. Our main objective is to identify differences on outcomes and complications between patients treated with one or combined implants. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with associated fractures of the proximal (31 AO) and shaft femur (32 AO). We divided the patients into two groups according to the use of single (GroupI) or combined implants (GroupII). Demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical data and development of complications were collected. RESULTS: We identified 28 patients (19 men and 9 women) with an average age of 43years. We used an anterograde femoral nail in GroupI (17 patients) and a retrograde femoral nail or a plate associated with hip lag screws or sliding hip screw in GroupII (11 patients). Patients were followed up for 26.28 (9.12-62.88) months. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis, infection or nonunion was found in 9 patients (32%). No significant differences (P=.70) were found in complications between two groups or between definitive surgical fixation before or after the first 24h. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the development of complications or timing of definitive fixation were found between the use of one or combined implants in ipsilateral proximal femur and shaft fractures. Regardless of the implant chosen, an appropriate osteosynthesis technique is crucial, even so high complication rates are expected.

Gluteal Compartment Syndrome After Femoral Nail Extraction: A Case Report.

Gluteal compartment syndrome is a rare disorder and no definitive treatment has yet been established. Fasciotomy is often the treatment of choice for gluteal compartment syndrome, but there have been only a few cases that have improved with conservative therapy. A 26-year-old male with a body mass index of 40.5 who underwent femoral nail extraction surgery had severe pain in the right buttock and numbness in the right lower extremity. Initially, we suspected transient pain due to prolonged exposure to the same posture, but muscle weakness in the lower extremities and worsening of renal function appeared over time. Orthopedic evaluation revealed physical examination findings and MRI imaging findings consistent with gluteal compartment syndrome. Conservative treatment with temporary dialysis was chosen instead of fasciotomy because of the time required for diagnosis. Dialysis was started on postoperative day 3, renal function and muscle weakness recovered over time, and the patient was discharged home on postoperative day 37. At six months post-op, the patient was walking without pain and he had no changes in his peripheral neurologic examination compared to his preoperative baseline. Orthopedic surgeons should always be aware of the possibility of gluteal compartment syndrome when especially obese patients with prolonged operation times appeal to acute buttock pain. Diagnosis should be made as early as possible to get a good prognosis.

Embolization of Renal Cell Carcinoma Skeletal Metastases Preceding Orthopedic Surgery.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of renal malignancy in adults. Bone is a major site of metastatic disease from RCC. Osseous metastatic disease from RCC is often seen in the spine, pelvis, and femur, and is usually hypervascular in nature like its primary tumor source. This can cause significant pain, reduced function, pathological fracture, nerve compression, and decreased quality of life during cancer treatment and disease course. Surgical treatments for pathological fracture of the femur include resection, reconstruction, and stabilization with arthroplasty or placement of an intramedullary nail. This series looks at three cases of renal cell carcinoma metastases to the hip with pre-procedural embolization and orthopedic stabilization. Interventional radiology embolization of the arterial supply to the metastatic hypervascular bone lesions can reduce intraoperative blood loss and associated complications.

Femoral shaft fractures in eldery patients - An epidemiological risk analysis of incidence, mortality and complications.

OBJECTIVES: This work aimed at answering the following research questions: (1) What is the incidence of femoral shaft fractures in the geriatric population in the U.S.? (2) What is the rate of mortality, mechanical complications, nonunion and infection, and what are the associated risk factors? STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In this cross-sectional study, femoral shaft fractures occurred between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019, were identified from Medicare records. Rates of mortality, nonunion, infection, and mechanical complications were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method with Fine and Gray sub-distribution adaptation. Semiparametric Cox regression was applied with twenty-three covariates to determine risk factors. RESULTS: Between 2009 through 2019 the incidence of femoral shaft fractures decreased by 12.07% to 40.8/100,000 inhabitants (p = 0.549). The 5-year mortality risk was 58.5%. Male sex, age over 75 years, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, tobacco dependence, and lower median household income were significant risk factors. The infection rate was 2.22% [95%CI: 1.90-2.58] and the union failure rate 2.52% [95%CI: 2.17-2.92] after 24 months. CONCLUSION: An early assessment of individual patient risk factors may be beneficial in the care and treatment of patients with these fractures.

Determination of intramedullary nail based on centerline adaptive registration.

Objective: Internal fixation with intramedullary nails is a gold standard for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. However, both the mismatch between intramedullary nails and the medullary cavity and inaccurate positioning of entry points will lead to deformation of intramedullary nails after implantation. The study aimed to determine a suitable intramedullary nail with an optimal entry point for a specific patient based on centerline adaptive registration. Method: A homotopic thinning algorithm is employed to extract centerlines of the femoral medullary cavity and the intramedullary nail. The two centerlines are registered to obtain a transformation. The medullary cavity and the intramedullary nail are registered based on the transformation. Next, a plane projection method is employed to calculate the surface points of the intramedullary nail laid outside the medullary cavity. According to the distribution of compenetration points, an iterative adaptive registration strategy is designed to decide an optimal position of the intramedullary nail in medullary cavity. The isthmus centerline is extended to the femur surface, where the entry point of the intramedullary nail is located. The suitability of an intramedullary nail for a specific patient was calculated by measuring the geometric quantities reflecting the interference between the femur and nail, and the suitability values of all nails are compared and the most suitable one is determined. Results: The growth experiment indicated that the bone to nail alignment is indeed affected by the extension of the isthmus centerline, including the extension direction and velocity. The geometrical experiment showed that this method could find the best registration position of intramedullary nails and select the optimal intramedullary nail for a specific patient. In the model experiments, the determined intramedullary nail could be successfully placed into the medullary cavity through the optimal entry point. A pre-screening tool to determine nails which can be successfully used has been given. In addition, the distal hole was accurately located within 14.28 s. Conclusion: These results suggest that the proposed method can select a suitable intramedullary nail with an optimal entry point. The position of the intramedullary nail can be determined in the medullary cavity, while deformation is avoided. The proposed method can determine the largest diameter intramedullary nail with as little damage to the intramedullary tissue as possible. The proposed method provides preparation aid for internal fixation with intramedullary nails guided by navigation systems or extracorporeal aimers.