Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis Reveals a Novel Genetic Variant in MYO6 Gene in an Indian Family with Postlingual Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss.

Background: Hereditary nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) is an extremely heterogeneous disorder, both genetically and clinically. Myosin VI (MYO6) pathogenic variations have been reported to cause both prelingual and postlingual forms of NSHL. Postlingual autosomal dominant cases are often overlooked for genetic etiology in clinical setups. In this study, we used next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based targeted deafness gene panel assay to identify the cause of postlingual hearing loss in an Indian family. Methods: The proband and his father from a multigenerational Indian family affected by postlingual hearing loss were examined via targeted capture of 129 deafness genes, after excluding gap junction protein beta 2 (GJB2) pathogenic variants by Sanger sequencing. NGS data analysis and co-segregation of the candidate variants in the family were carried out. The variant effect was predicted by in silico tools and interpreted following American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines. Results: A novel heterozygous transversion c.3225T>G, p.(Tyr1075*) in MYO6 gene was identified as the disease-causing variant in this family. This stop-gained variant is predicted to form a truncated myosin VI protein, which is devoid of crucial cargo-binding domain. PCR-RFLP screening in 200 NSHL cases and 200 normal-hearing controls showed the absence of this variant indicating its de novo nature in the population. Furthermore, we reviewed MYO6 variants reported from various populations to date. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first family with MYO6-associated hearing loss from an Indian population. The study also highlights the importance of deafness gene panels in molecular diagnosis of GJB2-negative pedigrees, contributing to genetic counseling in the affected families.

Population-based germline breast cancer gene association studies and meta-analysis to inform wider mainstream testing.

BACKGROUND: Germline genetic testing, previously restricted to familial and young-onset breast cancer, is now offered increasingly broadly to 'population-type' breast cancer patients in mainstream oncology clinics, with wide variation in the genes included. METHODS: Weighted meta-analysis was performed for three population-based case-control studies (BRIDGES, CARRIERS and UK Biobank) comprising in total 101,397 women with breast cancer and 312,944 women without breast cancer, to quantify for 37 putative breast cancer susceptibility genes (BCSGs) the frequency of pathogenic variants (PVs) in unselected, 'population-type' breast cancer cases and their association with breast cancer and its subtypes. RESULTS: Meta-analysed odds ratios (ORs) and frequencies of PVs in population-type breast cancer cases were generated for BRCA1 (OR= 8.73 (95% CI 7.47-10.20), 1 in 101), BRCA2 (OR=5.68 (5.13-6.30), 1 in 68) and PALB2 (OR= 4.30 (95% CI 3.68-5.03), 1 in 187). For both CHEK2 (OR=2.40 (95% CI 2.21-2.62), 1 in 73) and ATM (OR=2.16 (95%CI 1.93-2.41), 1 in 132) subgroup analysis showed stronger association with ER-positive disease. Magnitude of association and frequency of PVs were low for RAD51C (OR=1.53 (95%CI 1.15-2.04), 1 in 913), RAD51D (OR=1.76, (95%CI 1.15-2.41, 1 in 1079) and BARD1 (OR=2.34 (1.85-2.97), 1 in 672); frequencies and associations were moderately higher restricting to triple-negative breast cancers The PV-frequency in 'population-type' breast cancer cases was very low for 'syndromic' BCSGs TP53 (1 in 1844), STK11 (1 in 11,525), CDH1 (1 in 2668), PTEN (1 in 3755) and NF1 (1 in 1470), with metrics of association also modest ranging from OR=3.62 (95%CI 1.98-6.61) for TP53 down to OR=1.60 (95%CI 0.48-5.30) for STK11. CONCLUSIONS: These metrics reflecting 'population-type' breast cancer will be informative to defining the appropriate gene set as we continue to expand to germline testing out to more unselected population-type breast cancer cases.

Broadening the scope of multigene panel analysis for adult epilepsy patients.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is a suitable target for gene panel sequencing because a considerable portion of epilepsy is now explained by genetic components, especially in syndromic cases. However, previous gene panel studies on epilepsy have mostly focused on pediatric patients. METHODS: We enrolled adult epilepsy patients meeting any of the following criteria: family history of epilepsy, seizure onset age ≤ 19 years, neuronal migration disorder, and seizure freedom not achieved by dual anti-seizure medications. We sequenced the exonic regions of 211 epilepsy genes in these patients. To confirm the pathogenicity of a novel MTOR truncating variant, we electroporated vectors with different MTOR variants into developing mouse brains. RESULTS: A total of 92 probands and 4 affected relatives were tested, and the proportion of intellectual disability (ID) and/or developmental disability (DD) was 21.7%. As a result, twelve probands (13.0%) had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the following genes or regions: DEPDC5, 15q12-q13 duplication (n = 2), SLC6A1, SYNGAP1, EEF1A2, LGI1, MTOR, KCNQ2, MEF2C, and TSC1 (n = 1). We confirmed the functional impact of a novel truncating mutation in the MTOR gene (c.7570C > T, p.Gln2524Ter) that disrupted neuronal migration in a mouse model. The diagnostic yield was higher in patients with ID/DD or childhood-onset seizures. We also identified additional candidate variants in 20 patients that could be reassessed by further studies. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings underscore the clinical utility of gene panel sequencing in adult epilepsy patients suspected of having genetic etiology, especially those with ID/DD or early-onset seizures. Gene panel sequencing could not only lead to genetic diagnosis in a substantial portion of adult epilepsy patients but also inform more precise therapeutic decisions based on their genetic background. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study demonstrated the effectiveness of gene panel sequencing in adults with epilepsy, revealing pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 13.0% of patients. Higher diagnostic yields were observed in those with neurodevelopmental disorders or childhood-onset seizures. Additionally, we have shown that expanding genetic studies into adult patients would uncover new types of pathogenic variants for epilepsy, contributing to the advancement of precision medicine for individuals with epilepsy. In conclusion, our results highlight the practical value of employing gene panel sequencing in adult epilepsy patients, particularly when genetic etiology is clinically suspected.

Genetic Characterization of Kidney Failure of Unknown Etiology in Spain: Findings From the GENSEN Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) of unknown etiology (CKDUE) is one of the main global causes of kidney failure. While genetic studies may identify an etiology in these patients, few studies have implemented genetic testing of CKDUE in population-based series of patients which was the focus of the GENSEN. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 818 patients aged ≤45 years at 51 Spanish centers with CKDUE, and either an estimated GFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or treatment with maintenance dialysis or transplantation. OBSERVATIONS: Genetic testing for 529 genes associated to inherited nephropathies using high-throughput sequencing (HTS). Pathogenic and/or likely pathogenic (P/LP) gene variants concordant with the inheritance pattern were detected in 203 (24.8%) patients. Variants in type IV collagen genes were the most frequent (COL4A5, COL4A4, COL4A3; 35% of total gene variants), followed by NPHP1, PAX2, UMOD, MUC1 and INF2 (7.3%, 5.9%, 2.5%, 2.5% and 2.5% respectively). Overall, 87 novel variants classified as P/LP were identified. The top 5 most common previously undiagnosed diseases were Alport syndrome spectrum (35% of total positive reports), genetic podocytopathies (19%), nephronophthisis (11%), autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (7%) and congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT: 5%). Family history of kidney disease was reported by 191 (23.3 %) participants and by 65/203 (32.0%) patients with P/LP variants. LIMITATIONS: Missing data. Selection bias resulting from voluntary enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic testing with HTS identified a genetic cause of kidney disease in approximately one quarter of young patients with CKDUE and advanced kidney disease. These findings suggest that genetic studies are a potentially useful tool for the evaluation of people with CKDUE.

Precision Diagnostics in Myeloid Malignancies: Development and Validation of a National Capture-Based Gene Panel.

Gene panel sequencing has become a common diagnostic tool for detecting somatically acquired mutations in myeloid neoplasms. However, many panels have restricted content, provide insufficient sensitivity levels, or lack clinically validated workflows. We here describe the development and validation of the Genomic Medicine Sweden myeloid gene panel (GMS-MGP), a capture-based 191 gene panel including mandatory genes in contemporary guidelines as well as emerging candidates. The GMS-MGP displayed uniform coverage across all targets, including recognized difficult GC-rich areas. The validation of 117 previously described somatic variants showed a 100% concordance with a limit-of-detection of a 0.5% variant allele frequency (VAF), achieved by utilizing error correction and filtering against a panel-of-normals. A national interlaboratory comparison investigating 56 somatic variants demonstrated highly concordant results in both detection rate and reported VAFs. In addition, prospective analysis of 323 patients analyzed with the GMS-MGP as part of standard-of-care identified clinically significant genes as well as recurrent mutations in less well-studied genes. In conclusion, the GMS-MGP workflow supports sensitive detection of all clinically relevant genes, facilitates novel findings, and is, based on the capture-based design, easy to update once new guidelines become available. The GMS-MGP provides an important step toward nationally harmonized precision diagnostics of myeloid malignancies.

Paired comparison of the analytical performance between the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v3 and whole-exome sequencing of ovarian cancer tissue.

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology as a personalized medicine tool to identify targetable genetic alterations and to guide treatment decisions. However, the optimal NGS test strategy and target genes for clinical use are still being discussed. The aim was to compare the performance of the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v3 (OCAv3) (targeted gene panel) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) to investigate somatic single and multiple nucleotide variants and small indels in ovarian cancer patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Genomic DNA was isolated from fresh frozen samples of five high-grade serous (HGSC) and three clear cell ovarian (oCCC) cancer patients. Exome sequencing libraries were prepared by using the Ion AmpliSeq Exome RDY kit, whereas libraries for OCAv3 were prepared using by Ion AmpliSeq™ Library Kit Plus. Sequencing was performed using the Ion S5XL System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). When including only variants classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic or unknown significance based on ClinVar database verdicts and comparing overlapping regions covered both by the OCAv3 assay and WES, 23 variants were detected by both assays. However, OCAv3 detected additionally two variants: ARID1A: p.Gln563Ter and TP53: p.Ser261ValfsTer84 that have not passed WES filtering criteria due to low coverage. CONCLUSIONS: With the present treatment possibilities, OCAv3 panel testing provided higher diagnostic yield due to better coverage. Our study emphasizes that WES, although offering the potential to identify novel findings in genes not covered by OCAv3, might overlook variants in genes relevant for OC.

A targeted gene panel illuminates pathogenesis in young people with unexplained kidney failure.

BACKGROUND: Kidney failure in young people is often unexplained and a significant proportion will have an underlying genetic diagnosis. National Health Service England pioneered a comprehensive genomic testing service for such circumstances accessible to clinicians working outside of genetics. This is the first review of patients using this novel service since October 2021, following its introduction into clinical practice. METHODS: The 'Unexplained Young-Onset End-Stage Renal Disease' (test-code R257) gene panel uses targeted next generation sequencing to analyse 175 genes associated with renal disease in patients under 36 years of age. All tests undertaken between October 2021 and February 2022 were reviewed. Phenotypic data were extracted from request forms and referring clinicians contacted where additional details were required. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients underwent R257 testing over the study period. Among them, 23/71 patients (32%) were confirmed to have a genetic diagnosis and 2/71 (3%) had a genetically suggestive variant. Nephronophthisis and Alport syndrome were the most common conditions identified, (4/23 (17%) with pathogenic variants in NPHP1 and 4/23 (17%) with pathogenic variants in COL4A3/COL4A4). Positive predictors of a genetic diagnosis included a family history of renal disease (60% of positive cases) and extra-renal disease manifestations (48% of positive cases). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the R257 gene panel in unexplained young-onset kidney failure, freely accessible to patients meeting testing criteria in England. A genetic diagnosis was identified in 32% of patients. This study highlights the essential and expanding role that genomic testing has for children and families affected by renal disease today.

Prevention, diagnosis and clinical management of hereditary breast cancer beyond BRCA1/2 genes.

The detection of germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in BRCA1/2 and other breast cancer (BC) genes is rising exponentially thanks to the advent of multi-gene panel testing. This promising technology, coupled with the availability of specific therapies for BC BRCA-related, has increased the number of patients eligible for genetic testing. Implementing multi-gene panel testing for hereditary BC screening holds promise to maximise benefits for patients at hereditary risk of BC. These benefits range from prevention programs to antineoplastic-targeted therapies. However, the clinical management of these patients is complex and requires guidelines based on recent evidence. Furthermore, applying multi-gene panel testing into clinical practice increases the detection of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). This augments the complexity of patients' clinical management, becoming an unmet need for medical oncologists. This review aims to collect updated evidence on the most common BC-related genes besides BRCA1/2, from their biological role in BC development to their potential impact in tailoring prevention and treatment strategies.

The Importance of Molecular Genetic Testing for Precision Diagnostics, Management, and Genetic Counseling in MODY Patients.

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is part of the heterogeneous group of monogenic diabetes (MD) characterized by the non-immune dysfunction of pancreatic ß-cells. The diagnosis of MODY still remains a challenge for clinicians, with many cases being misdiagnosed as type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM/T2DM), and over 80% of cases remaining undiagnosed. With the introduction of modern technologies, important progress has been made in deciphering the molecular mechanisms and heterogeneous etiology of MD, including MODY. The aim of our study was to identify genetic variants associated with MODY in a group of patients with early-onset diabetes/prediabetes in whom a form of MD was clinically suspected. Genetic testing, based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, was carried out either in a targeted manner, using gene panels for monogenic diabetes, or by analyzing the entire exome (whole-exome sequencing). GKC-MODY 2 was the most frequently detected variant, but rare forms of KCNJ11-MODY 13, specifically, HNF4A-MODY 1, were also identified. We have emphasized the importance of genetic testing for early diagnosis, MODY subtype differentiation, and genetic counseling. We presented the genotype-phenotype correlations, especially related to the clinical evolution and personalized therapy, also emphasizing the particularities of each patient in the family context.

Genomic Newborn Screening for Pediatric Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: A Holistic Approach.

As next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become more widely used, germline and rare genetic variations responsible for inherited illnesses, including cancer predisposition syndromes (CPSs) that account for up to 10% of childhood malignancies, have been found. The CPSs are a group of germline genetic disorders that have been identified as risk factors for pediatric cancer development. Excluding a few "classic" CPSs, there is no agreement regarding when and how to conduct germline genetic diagnostic studies in children with cancer due to the constant evolution of knowledge in NGS technologies. Various clinical screening tools have been suggested to aid in the identification of individuals who are at greater risk, using diverse strategies and with varied outcomes. We present here an overview of the primary clinical and molecular characteristics of various CPSs and summarize the existing clinical genomics data on the prevalence of CPSs in pediatric cancer patients. Additionally, we discuss several ethical issues, challenges, limitations, cost-effectiveness, and integration of genomic newborn screening for CPSs into a healthcare system. Furthermore, we assess the effectiveness of commonly utilized decision-support tools in identifying patients who may benefit from genetic counseling and/or direct genetic testing. This investigation highlights a tailored and systematic approach utilizing medical newborn screening tools such as the genome sequencing of high-risk newborns for CPSs, which could be a practical and cost-effective strategy in pediatric cancer care.

BRCA1 Intragenic Duplication Combined with a Likely Pathogenic TP53 Variant in a Patient with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Risk and Management.

For patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, the probability of carrying two pathogenic variants (PVs) in dominant cancer-predisposing genes is rare. Using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS), we investigated a 49-year-old Caucasian woman who developed a highly aggressive breast tumor. Our analyses identified an intragenic germline heterozygous duplication in BRCA1 with an additional likely PV in the TP53 gene. The BRCA1 variant was confirmed by multiplex ligation probe amplification (MLPA), and genomic breakpoints were characterized at the nucleotide level (c.135-2578_442-1104dup). mRNA extracted from lymphocytes was amplified by RT-PCR and then Sanger sequenced, revealing a tandem duplication r.135_441dup; p.(Gln148Ilefs*20). This duplication results in the synthesis of a truncated and, most likely, nonfunctional protein. Following functional studies, the TP53 exon 5 c.472C > T; p.(Arg158Cys) missense variant was classified as likely pathogenic by the Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) working group. This type of unexpected association will be increasingly identified in the future, with the switch from targeted BRCA sequencing to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) panel sequencing, raising the question of how these patients should be managed. It is therefore important to record and investigate these rare double-heterozygous genotypes.

Evaluating parental personal utility of pediatric genetic and genomic testing in a diverse, multilingual population.

There is increasing evidence of the clinical utility of genetic and genomic testing (GT); however, factors influencing personal utility of GT, especially in diverse, multilingual populations, remain unclear. We explored these factors in a diverse cohort of parents/guardians (participants) whose children received clinical GT through the NYCKidSeq program. A total of 847 participants completed surveys at baseline, post-results disclosure, and 6 months (6m) post-results. The largest population groups were Hispanic/Latino(a) (48%), White/European American (24%), and Black/African American (16%). Personal utility was assessed using the Personal Utility (PrU) scale, adapted for pediatric populations and included on the surveys. Three PrU subscales were identified using factor analysis: practical, educational, and parental psychological utility. Overall personal utility summary score and the three subscales significantly decreased after receiving results and over time. Hispanic/Latino(a) participants identified greater overall personal utility than European American and African American participants at all time points (p < 0.001) as did participants whose children received positive/likely positive results compared with those with negative and uncertain results (post-results: p < 0.001 and p < 0.001; 6m post-results: p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Post-results, higher subscale scores were associated with lower education levels (practical, parental psychological: p ≤ 0.02) and higher levels of trust in the healthcare system (practical, parental psychological: p ≤ 0.04). These findings help to understand the perspectives of diverse parents/guardians, which is critical to tailoring pre- and post-test counseling across a variety of populations and clinical settings.

Genetic testing, another important tool in presurgical evaluation of focal epilepsies in childhood.

Epilepsy surgery may be a curative therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsies when focal lesions or foci are identified. Genetic testing is not yet routinely included in many presurgical evaluation programs although recent evidence support that finding a germline genetic mutation could help to better delineate the patient candidacy to surgery and provide valuable information on the expected surgery outcome. In this study, we report nine patients presenting drug-resistant focal epilepsy enrolled in presurgical evaluation. We show how the identification of genetic pathogenic variant in epilepsy known genes led to the interruption of the presurgical work-up and ruled out surgery in 7 of them. We observed that the co-existence of some recurrent clinical characteristics as early seizures' onset, frequent precipitating factors including fever, and developmental delay or intellectual disability may be useful markers for germline genetic pathogenic variants. In this group, genetic assessment should be mandatory during presurgical work up, mainly in patients with negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or doubtful structural lesions. The integration of next generation targeted sequencing into the presurgical evaluation can improve the selection of candidates for resective surgery and fosters a personalized medicine approach with a better outcome. PLAINE LANGUAGE ABSTRACT: Genetic testing is not yet systematically included in the pre-surgical assessment of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsies. In this study, through the description of nine patients, we underline how the integration of genomics into the presurgical work up can help in evaluating the patient candidacy to surgery and provide valuable information on expected surgery outcome.

The Current Achievements of Multi-Gene Panel Tests in Clinical Settings for Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Some multi-gene panel tests have been implemented in clinical settings to guide targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. The current performance of multi-gene panel tests under the condition that the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT) and Amoy Dx® Pan Lung Cancer PCR panel (AmoyDx-multi) are available remains relatively unknown. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with NSCLC, whose FFPE samples were considered for genetic testing. We assessed the submission rates, the success rates, and the driver oncogene detection rates of multi-gene panel tests. A total of 225 patients were histologically newly diagnosed with NSCLC or diagnosed with a recurrence of NSCLC without a previous multi-gene panel test at our institution. Among the 225 patients, the FFPE samples of 212 patients (94.2%) were submitted for multi-gene panel testing, including 191 samples (84.9%) for the ODxTT and 21 samples (9.3%) for the AmoyDx-multi. Among the 212 samples submitted to multi-gene panel tests, the success rate was 99.5% (211/212). The detection rate of driver oncogene alterations for all histologies was 52.4% (111/212), and that for adenocarcinoma was 69.7% (106/152). A favorable submission rate and success rate of multi-gene panel tests were shown, along with a favorable detection rate in recent clinical settings.

Next generation sequencing panel as an effective approach to genetic testing in patients with a highly variable phenotype of neuromuscular disorders.

Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) include a wide range of diseases affecting the peripheral nervous system. The genetic diagnoses are increasingly obtained with using the next generation sequencing (NGS). We applied the custom-design targeted NGS panel including 89 genes, together with genotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to identify a genetic spectrum of NMDs in 52 Polish patients. As a result, the genetic diagnosis was determined by NGS panel in 29 patients so its diagnostic utility is estimated at 55.8%. The most pathogenic variants were found in CLCN1, followed by CAPN3, SCN4A, and SGCA genes. Genotyping of myotonic dystrophy type 1 and 2 (DM1 and DM2) as a secondary approach has been performed. The co-occurrence of CAPN3 and CNBP mutations in one patient as well as DYSF and CNBP mutations in another suggests possibly more complex inheritance as well as expression of a phenotype. In 7 individuals with single nucleotide variant found in NGS testing, the MLPA of the CAPN3 gene was performed detecting the deletion encompassing exons 2-8 in the CAPN3 gene in one patient, confirming recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 1 (LGMDR1). Thirty patients obtained a genetic diagnosis (57.7%) after using NGS testing, genotyping and MLPA analysis. The study allowed for the identification of 27 known and 4 novel pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) associated with NMDs.In conclusion, the diagnostic approach with diverse molecular techniques enables to broaden the mutational spectrum and maximizes the diagnostic yield. Furthermore, the co-occurrence of DM2 and LGMD has been detected in 2 individuals.

Pleomorphic Rhabdomyosarcoma of the Uterine Corpus in an Adult Who Underwent Multi-gene Panel Testing.

Background/Aim: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common malignant soft tissue tumor in children. Adult primary RMS of gynecological origin is a rare condition and uterine RMS is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. The genetic variants associated with uterine RMS in adults have yet to be fully elucidated, and there is no established therapeutic strategy for rare tumors. Case Report: A 69-year-old Japanese woman was referred to our hospital with abdominal bloating. Imaging examination revealed a tumor with diameter of 85 mm located in the uterus and multiple regional lymph node metastases. Biopsy of the uterine corpus indicated possible uterine carcinosarcoma or RMS. Following debulking surgery, the patient was diagnosed with stage IVB pleomorphic RMS. The patient was treated with two courses of doxorubicin every three weeks and one course of combination chemotherapy with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide. Because of rapid progression of the disease, we decided to perform multi-gene panel testing to determine the most effective therapeutic strategy. However, no therapeutic plan based on genetic information was identified. The patient with chemotherapy-refractory RMS died 11 weeks after surgery. Conclusion: Our patient had advanced uterine RMS with an unresectable tumor that was resistant to chemotherapy, resulting in poor outcomes. Despite conducting multi-gene panel testing, no tailored therapeutic approach based on genetic information was found. This case highlights the challenges in managing uterine RMS in adults and underscores the urgent need for further research to identify effective treatment modalities.

Clinical utility of comprehensive gene panel testing for common and rare causes of skeletal dysplasia and other skeletal disorders: Results from the largest cohort to date.

Molecular genetics enables more precise diagnoses of skeletal dysplasia and other skeletal disorders (SDs). We investigated the clinical utility of multigene panel testing for 5011 unrelated individuals with SD in the United States (December 2019-April 2022). Median (range) age was 8 (0-90) years, 70.5% had short stature and/or disproportionate growth, 27.4% had a positive molecular diagnosis (MDx), and 30 individuals received two MDx. Genes most commonly contributing to MDx were FGFR3 (16.9%), ALPL (13.0%), and COL1A1 (10.3%). Most of the 112 genes associated with ≥1 MDx were primarily involved in signal transduction (n = 35), metabolism (n = 23), or extracellular matrix organization (n = 17). There were implications associated with specific care/treatment options for 84.4% (1158/1372) of MDx-positive individuals; >50% were linked to conditions with targeted therapy approved or in clinical development, including osteogenesis imperfecta, achondroplasia, hypophosphatasia, and mucopolysaccharidosis. Forty individuals with initially inconclusive results became MDx-positive following family testing. Follow-up mucopolysaccharidosis enzyme activity testing was positive in 14 individuals (10 of these were not MDx-positive). Our findings showed that inclusion of metabolic genes associated with SD increased the clinical utility of a gene panel and confirmed that integrated use of comprehensive gene panel testing with orthogonal testing reduced the burden of inconclusive results.

Malignant perineurioma derived from the retroperitoneum with an aggressive clinical course: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Malignant perineurioma is a rare malignant counterpart of perineurioma derived from perineural cells. Resection is the primary option for the treatment of malignant perineuriomas; however, patients often develop recurrence after resection, and effective treatment for advanced or recurrent lesions needs to be established. This report describes a 51-year-old female with a rare malignant perineurioma in the retroperitoneum, which contributing valuable insights to the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient presented with abdominal distension and the imaging work-up revealed a huge hemorrhagic tumor in the retroperitoneum and obstruction of inferior vena cava by the tumor. The patient underwent surgery retrieving the tumor combined with left hemiliver and retrohepatic vena cava, which confirmed the diagnosis of a malignant perineurioma based on histopathological and immunohistochemical examination. Cancer gene panel testing identified mutations in NF2. Radiotherapy was administered for peritoneal dissemination 2 months after surgery, and the patient died from disease progression 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This rare case highlights the challenges in managing retroperitoneal malignant perineuriomas. The aggressive characteristics and limited treatment options for advanced malignant perineuriomas underscore the need for understanding the pathogenesis and developing effective systemic therapies. The identification of an NF2 mutation provides significant insights into potential therapeutic target.

Improving the Yield of Genetic Diagnosis through Additional Genetic Panel Testing in Hereditary Ophthalmic Diseases.

Numerous hereditary ophthalmic diseases display significant genetic diversity. Consequently, the utilization of gene panel sequencing allows a greater number of patients to receive a genetic diagnosis for their clinical manifestations. We investigated how to improve the yield of genetic diagnosis through additional gene panel sequencing in hereditary ophthalmic diseases. A gene panel sequencing consisting of a customized hereditary retinopathy panel or hereditary retinitis pigmentosa (RP) panel was prescribed and referred to a CAP-accredited clinical laboratory. If no significant mutations associated with hereditary retinopathy and RP were detected in either panel, additional gene panel sequencing was requested for research use, utilizing the remaining panel. After additional gene panel sequencing, a total of 16 heterozygous or homozygous variants were identified in 15 different genes associated with hereditary ophthalmic diseases. Of 15 patients carrying any candidate variants, the clinical symptoms could be tentatively accounted for by genetic mutations in seven patients. However, in the remaining eight patients, given the in silico mutation predictive analysis, variant allele frequency in gnomAD, inheritance pattern, and genotype-phenotype correlation, fully elucidating the clinical manifestations with the identified rare variant was challenging. Our study highlights the utility of gene panel sequencing in achieving accurate diagnoses for hereditary ophthalmic diseases and enhancing the diagnostic yield through additional gene panel sequencing. Thus, gene panel sequencing can serve as a primary tool for the genetic diagnosis of hereditary ophthalmic diseases, even in cases where a single genetic cause is suspected. With a deeper comprehension of the genetic mechanisms underlying these diseases, it becomes feasible.

Japanese General Clinical Oncologists' Knowledge and Real-world Experiences of Cancer Genomic Medicine: A Nationwide Web-based Survey Study.

Introduction: In Japan, insurance began covering two cancer gene panel tests in 2019. However, the availability of these tests remains limited to 247 facilities (as of October 2023). This survey-based study assessed the knowledge and recognition of cancer genomic medicine by physicians involved in cancer treatment. Methods: Written requests for participation in a web-based questionnaire survey were sent to 14,579 affiliated general clinical oncologists certified by the Japanese Board of Cancer Therapy. The survey was conducted from July 1 to 31st, 2021. Data between physicians affiliated with cancer genome hospitals and noncancer genome hospitals and between regions of Japan were compared. Results: In total, 2,402 valid responses were analyzed. Of the respondents, 1,296 and 1,106 were physicians working at cancer and noncancer genome hospitals, respectively. Physicians working at cancer genome hospitals showed significantly higher results for both knowledge of cancer genomic medicine and experience in cancer gene panel test performance compared with those working at noncancer genome hospitals. There were no significant regional differences in the percentage of physicians who reported having performed cancer gene panel tests. Conclusions: The survey results suggest a disparity in the knowledge of cancer genomic medicine between physicians working at cancer genome hospitals and those working at noncancer genome hospitals; this disparity should be addressed by stakeholders. Closer collaboration between these facilities may be necessary to achieve national dissemination of cancer genomic medicine.