Newborn Hearing Screening Success Patient Care Failure.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a newborn hearing screening program in an urban hospital 24 years after a longitudinal study identified failings in its program and recommended solutions. METHODS: A hospital-specific, Pennsylvania database was queried to determine rates of in-hospital testing, referral, and diagnosis for Temple University Hospital (TUH), and to compare these with reporting sites statewide. At TUH, interviews with newborn hearing screeners and audiologists were conducted to identify barriers to care. RESULTS: In the year 2022, 2,006/2,069 newborns (97%) were successfully screened prior to hospital discharge at TUH. (63 babies were never tested). There were 73 who did not pass automated auditory brainstem response testing (ABR) in at least one ear. All of these 73 infants returned for repeat automated ABR testing and 50/73 passed in both ears. 23/2006 (1%) were referred to diagnostic testing. 13/23 were successfully scheduled. 11/23 passed in both ears. 2/13 were found to have hearing losses. 10 infants (43%) were lost to follow-up and were never diagnosed. Examining lost-to-follow-up rates statewide, we identified a relationship between successful follow-up and local median family income. CONCLUSION: Legislation on the state level and improvements in audiometric technology have led to highly successful in-hospital screening with relatively low false-positive rates. Despite this, inadequate outpatient follow-up testing and inequities in the American health care system continue to delay audiometric diagnosis and habilitation of congenital hearing loss. Lack of transportation, childcare for siblings, and newborn insurance status impede access to diagnostic testing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 evidence-retrospective review comparing cases and controls. Laryngoscope, 2024.

Kids are not just small adults: An attempt to validate pediatric tablet-based digits in noise testing.

Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate whether conductive hearing loss (CHL) can be differentiated from sensorineural hearing loss in children ages 3-18 using a diotic and antiphasic digits-in-noise (DIN) tablet-based test using existing adult cut-off criteria. Methods: A blinded multi-institutional prospective cohort of 64 children aged 3-18 scheduled for an audiometric soundbooth evaluation with a pediatric audiologist and a same-day otolaryngologist examination were recruited for the study. Following a conventional audiogram, the subjects underwent diotic (same-phased stimuli) and antiphasic (out-of-phase stimuli) DIN testing on a HearX Samsung Galaxy tablet with over-the-ear headphones, for a total of 128 measurements. DIN test results were compared with soundbooth audiometry using known adult "cut off criteria." Results: A logistic regression analysis adjusted for demographics (age, sex) and race was performed to compare CHL determination from DIN testing to CHL determination with soundbooth audiometry. The results showed 50% agreement with a p-value of .753. The determinations based on combined DIN testing agreed with each other 33% of the time and had a p-value of .373. Otologic pathology and age were not predictive of outcome. Conclusion: This preliminary analysis of DIN testing indicated that DIN and audiometric testing completed in a soundbooth were not significantly predictive of one another in the population of children aged 3-18 when using the adult cut-off criteria for CHL differentiation. Given these findings, further testing is required in children to determine pediatric specific cut-off values.

Newborn hearing screening in Eastern Saudi Arabia: A tertiary hospital experience.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the performance of a leading institution in implementing newborn hearing screening and address two key areas: the knowledge gap in screening practice and the prevalence of permanent sensorineural hearing loss in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We analyzed the prevalence of hearing impairment in all live births at King Fahad Hospital of the University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia, from September 2018 to June 2022. Automated auditory brainstem response was used for both initial screening and rescreening. Newborns who failed the rescreening underwent a diagnostic evaluation. We assessed the coverage of initial screening, the rate of lost follow-up, referrals for rescreening and diagnostic evaluation, and the prevalence of hearing impairment. RESULTS: A total of 5,986 newborns were born. Of these, 96.5% were screened. The passing rate for the initial screening and rescreening was 71.8%. However, 27.5% of newborns were lost to follow-up. Only 0.7% required referral for a diagnostic evaluation. The overall prevalence of hearing impairment was 2.6 per 1,000 newborns. CONCLUSION: Early identification of hearing loss through newborn screening improves the lives of affected individuals. Our program currently meets the World Health Organization's 1-3-6 benchmark goals. However, the underestimation of permanent hearing loss due to the 30% lost-to-follow-up rate is a limitation. Emphasizing the importance of the screening program is crucial to raising awareness and improving the accuracy of prevalence rates.

Mapping neonatal hearing screening services in Cape Town metro: A situational analysis.

BACKGROUND:  Childhood hearing loss is a global health concern. Despite the proven benefits of neonatal hearing screening (NHS), it is not yet mandated in South Africa. The lack of awareness of hearing loss and absence of NHS leads to delayed diagnosis and adverse developmental outcomes for affected children. AIM:  The study aimed to assess the availability of NHS services across primary healthcare (PHC) facilities in the City of Cape Town (CCT). SETTING:  Surveys were conducted with 26 PHC facilities in the CCT metropolitan areas that offer mother and child healthcare services. METHODS:  Surveys gathered data through online and telephone methods. The surveys aimed to assess the availability and nature of NHS services, care pathways and training of healthcare professionals regarding NHS. RESULTS:  None of the facilities used objective screening methods to screen hearing or have standardised care pathways for at-risk babies. Instead, they relied on parental concerns, with the use of the Road to Health book. None of the respondents reported having received hearing screening training, and the majority of participants (62%) lacked confidence in their knowledge of ear and hearing care. CONCLUSION:  The absence of NHS services highlights the need for standardised protocols and increased awareness among healthcare workers and caregivers. Implementing NHS services could facilitate earlier diagnosis and intervention of hearing loss for infants in the Western Cape.Contribution: This study's findings could guide efforts to improving access to NHS access at PHC level in Cape Town, ultimately providing early hearing screening services to infants.

Risk factors and hearing outcomes in infants and young children in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

BACKGROUND:  Targeted new-born hearing screening, based on high risk factors is recommended in the absence of universal new-born hearing screening in resource-constrained settings. The relevance of risk factors listed in the guidelines of high-income countries and used by low-middle income countries remains relatively unknown. Risk factors consistent with the epidemiological profile, evolution of risks and disease burden in these countries need to be considered. OBJECTIVES:  This study aimed to profile the frequency of risk factors and their manifestation in hearing outcomes of young children in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. METHOD:  A chart review of N = 1433 patients' archival audiology records was conducted, conveniently sampled from a single tertiary hospital (n = 351), a provincial assessment and therapy centre (n = 649), a university clinic (n = 291), and two schools for the deaf (n = 142). RESULTS:  Overall, 56% of the participants presented with either a conductive, sensorineural or a mixed hearing loss; 62% of the children had between 1 and 2 risk factors present (Mean [M] = 1.1; standard deviation [s.d.] = 0.98). Admission to neonatal intensive care unit, maternal infections, bacterial and viral infections and chemotherapy, from the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing list of high risk factors were significantly associated with hearing loss (p  0.05). Known non-JCIH risks, emerging risks and other statistically significant contextually relevant risk factors were also noted. CONCLUSION:  Understanding the profile of high risk factors in a given context has implications for prevention, early hearing identification and intervention services.Contribution: Targeted new-born hearing screening needs to be based on risk factors that are contextually relevant. This study is one of the first profiling high risk factors for hearing loss in children in KZN, the province with the second highest population in South Africa.

Digital speech hearing screening using a quick novel mobile hearing impairment assessment: an observational correlation study.

By 2050, 1 in 4 people worldwide will be living with hearing impairment. We propose a digital Speech Hearing Screener (dSHS) using short nonsense word recognition to measure speech-hearing ability. The importance of hearing screening is increasing due to the anticipated increase in individuals with hearing impairment globally. We compare dSHS outcomes with standardized pure-tone averages (PTA) and speech-recognition thresholds (SRT). Fifty participants (aged 55 or older underwent pure-tone and speech-recognition thresholding. One-way ANOVA was used to compare differences between hearing impaired and hearing not-impaired groups, by the dSHS, with a clinical threshold of moderately impaired hearing at 35 dB and severe hearing impairment at 50 dB. dSHS results significantly correlated with PTAs/SRTs. ANOVA results revealed the dSHS was significantly different (F(1,47) = 38.1, p < 0.001) between hearing impaired and unimpaired groups. Classification analysis using a 35 dB threshold, yielded accuracy of 85.7% for PTA-based impairment and 81.6% for SRT-based impairment. At a 50 dB threshold, dSHS classification accuracy was 79.6% for PTA-based impairment (Negative Predictive Value (NPV)-93%) and 83.7% (NPV-100%) for SRT-based impairment. The dSHS successfully differentiates between hearing-impaired and unimpaired individuals in under 3 min. This hearing screener offers a time-saving, in-clinic hearing screening to streamline the triage of those with likely hearing impairment to the appropriate follow-up assessment, thereby improving the quality of services. Future work will investigate the ability of the dSHS to help rule out hearing impairment as a cause or confounder in clinical and research applications.

Feasibility of implementing a school entry hearing screening programme in the South-East District, Botswana.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of implementing a school entry hearing screening programme in the South-East District, Botswana. DESIGN: A feasibility study design was used. Trained screeners conducted smartphone-based pure tone audiometry screening at 25 dB HL, at 1, 2, and 4 kHz using calibrated headphones. Learners with "refer" results after an immediate rescreen were referred and scheduled for diagnostic hearing assessment at the local hospital. Attendance at diagnostic appointments was encouraged through multiple contacts with the families. STUDY SAMPLE: The study participants were 403 Grade 1 learners from eight public primary schools. RESULTS: The overall referral rate for diagnostic hearing assessment was 4.7%, with a referral uptake rate of 90%. The sensitivity and specificity of the hearing screening protocol were 93.3% and 86.4%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 82.4% and 95%, respectively. The average cost per learner screened was US$ 10.75. CONCLUSIONS: School entry hearing screening programmes can be successfully implemented in the South-East District, Botswana. Lessons learnt from this study can potentially guide phased implementation of school hearing screening programmes in other districts.

Cost-effectiveness of portable-automated ABR for universal neonatal hearing screening in India.

The World Health Organization considers Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) essential to global public health. Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram has included newborn hearing screening in India since 2013. The program faces human, infrastructure, and equipment shortages. First-line hearing screening with improved diagnostic accuracy is needed. The Portable Automated Auditory Brainstem Responses (P-AABR) can be used in remote areas for UNHS due to its low infrastructure needs and diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of P-AABR in UNHS. We employed an analytical model based on decision trees to assess the cost-effectiveness of Otoacoustic Emission (OAE) and P-AABR. The total cost to the health system for P-AABR, regardless of true positive cases, is INR 10,535,915, while OAE costs INR 7,256,198. P-AABR detects 262 cases, whereas OAE detects 26 cases. Portable Automated ABR costs INR 97 per case detection, while OAE costs INR 67. The final ICER was 97407.69. The P-AABR device is cost-effective, safe and feasible for UNHS Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) programs. Beyond reducing false referrals and parent indirect costs, it detects more hearing-impaired infants. Even in shortages of skilled workers, existing staff can be trained. Thus, this study suggests integrating this device into community and primary health centers to expand UNHS coverage.

Middle-Ear Salivary Gland Choristoma with Congenital, Single-Sided Hearing Loss.

Middle-ear salivary gland choristoma (SGCh) is a rare, benign tumor that causes conductive hearing loss owing to middle-ear morphological abnormalities. Early diagnosis is challenging, and surgical resection is indispensable for a definitive diagnosis. We report the case of a 3-year-old boy diagnosed with middle-ear SGCh during the follow-up period for left-sided hearing loss discovered at newborn hearing screening (NHS). Long-term follow-up after the NHS result, subsequent computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical resection led to its relatively early diagnosis and treatment.

Long-term outcomes of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in children early identified by extended hearing-targeted screening.

OBJECTIVES: Congenital Cytomegalovirus (cCMV) has been associated with hearing, vision, and neurodevelopmental long-term sequelae. Despite the social burden associated with the disease, a universally accepted consensus on screening, diagnostic, therapeutic and follow-up approaches has not been reached. The present observational retrospective study aims at describing long-term sequelae and radiological abnormalities associated with cCMV in children early identified by extended hearing-targeted screening and evaluated by audiological follow-up in a single III Level Audiological Referral Center for at least 2 years. METHODS: Audiological neonatal and follow-up data were available for all subjects. Data collection included clinical neonatal and virological assessment at birth. Ophthalmological, neurodevelopmental and neuroradiological follow-up abnormalities compatible with cCMV sequelae were collected by clinical reports. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho-ρ) was used to evaluate possible correlations among the considered parameters. RESULTS: 61 newborns were identified by extended hearing-targeted cCMV screening and diagnosed mostly (83.6 %) by PCR viral DNA extraction in urine collected within the 15° day of life. Seventeen babies were born preterm, with a mean gestational age of 33.5 weeks. Sixteen patients (26.2 %) were admitted to an Intensive or sub-Intensive Neonatal Care Unit. At birth, 35 newborns were symptomatic (57.3 %), and 19 of them received antiviral treatment by valganciclovir or ganciclovir. Overall, 20 children (32.7 %) were diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), among them 17 (85 %) were refer at the newborn hearing screening while 3 (15 %) were Pass. 5/20 children (25 %) presented isolated SNHL, while in 15/20 (75 %) children SNHL was associated to other long-term sequelae. In 5 patients (25 %) a progression of the hearing threshold was observed, with a mean age of progression of 26 months of age. Risk factors for progression were a worse final hearing threshold (Spearman's ρ = 0.434; p = 0.0001) and a worse hearing threshold at birth (Spearman's ρ = 0.298; p = 0.020). Thirteen children were fitted with hearing aids, 8 of whom subsequently underwent cochlear implantation. Concerning long term impairments, 10/61 children (17 %) presented a variety of ophthalmological sequelae, while 16/40 cCMV patients (40 %) were diagnosed with neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Language delays were significantly associated with a worse hearing threshold (ρ = 0.582; p = 0.0001) and with other neurocognitive abnormalities (ρ = 0.677, p = 0.0001). 30 children underwent radiological brain evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and 63.3 % of them presented abnormalities compatible with cCMV. Mean viral load at birth did not show significant associations with long-term sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the diverse and significant long-term sequelae of cCMV infection detected through early screening. With a significant proportion of cCMV children developing sensorineural hearing loss, ophthalmological and neurodevelopmental issues, the results emphasize the importance of continuous, multidisciplinary follow-up. Early identification and tailored interventions are crucial for improving the long-term health and quality of life of children affected by cCMV.

Gestational diabetes mellitus and the hearing of newborns:A nested case-control study in tropical province of China.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the association of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the results of newborn hearing screening(NHS). METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted in a cohort of newborns who were born between June 2021 to December 2021 and underwent neonatal hearing screening.GDM was diagnosed according to the 75 g 2 h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 gestational weeks.A total of 369 pregnant women at the same hospital were individually matched in a 1:2 ratio by maternal age (±2 years), gestational age (±3 days) and sex of newborn.Chi-square test was utilized to evaluate associations between GDM and the results of NHS. RESULTS: Abnormal NHS results in the GDM group was more frequent than non-GDM group.When comparing the two groups (GDM case and contol), we found significant differences (p < 0.05) between them.Whereas the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) by delivery modes in both case and control groups. CONCLUSION: Maternal history of GDM could lead to significantly higher failling rate of NHS.

Genetic screening of newborns for deafness over 11 years in Beijing, China: More infants could benefit from an expanded program.

Genetic screening of newborns for deafness plays an important role in elucidating the etiology of deafness, diagnosing it early, and intervening in it. Genetic screening of newborns has been conducted for 11 years in Beijing. It started with a chip to screen for 9 variants of 4 genes in 2012; the chip screened for 15 variants of those genes in 2018, and it now screens for 23 variants of those genes. In the current study, a comparative analysis of three screening protocols and follow-up for infants with pathogenic variants was performed. The rates of detection and hearing test results of infants with pathogenic variants were analyzed. Subjects were 493,821 infants born at 122 maternal and child care centers in Beijing from April 2012 to August 2023. Positivity increased from 4.599% for the chip to screen for 9 variants to 4.971% for the chip to screen for 15 variants, and further to 11.489% for the chip to screen for 23 variants. The carrier frequency of the GJB2 gene increased from 2.489% for the chip to screen for 9 variants and 2.422% for the chip to screen for 15 variants to 9.055% for the chip to screen for 23 variants. The carrier frequency of the SLC26A4 gene increased from 1.621% for the chip to screen for 9 variants to 2.015% for the chip to screen for 15 variants and then to 2.151% for the chip to screen for 23 variants. According to the chip to screen for 9 variants and the chip to screen for 15 variants, the most frequent mutant allele was c.235delC. According to the chip to screen for 23 variants, the most frequent mutant allele was c.109G>A. The chip to screen for 15 variants was used to screen 66.67% (14/21) of newborns with biallelic variants in the SLC26A4 gene for newly added mutations. The chip to screen for 23 variants was used to screen 92.98% (53/57) of newborns with biallelic variants in the GJB2 gene (52 cases were biallelic c.109G>A) and 25% (1/4) of newborns with biallelic variants in the SLC26A4 gene for newly added mutations. Among the infants with pathogenic variants (biallelic variants in GJB2 or SLC26A4), 20.66% (25/121) currently have normal hearing. In addition, 34.62% (9/26) of newborns who passed the hearing screening were diagnosed with hearing loss. Findings indicate that a growing number of newborns have benefited, and especially in the early identification of potential late-onset hearing loss, as the number of screening sites has increased. Conducting long-term audiological monitoring for biallelic variants in individuals with normal hearing is of paramount significance.

Establishment of the Norwegian hearing register for children.

Introduction: The Norwegian Directorate of Health approved the Norwegian Hearing Register for Children in 2022. The main objective of the register is to improve the quality of treatment for children with permanent hearing loss, by measures, follow-ups and monitoring the quality and results of the health care system. Methods: Inclusion criteria are children who do not pass universal newborn hearing screening and/or children with permanent hearing loss <18 years of age. Hearing loss is defined as pure-tone audiometry threshold of (PTA4) > 20 dB in at least one ear. Data are registered at the Ear, Nose and Throat departments at inclusion and at follow-ups at the age of 3, 6, 10, and 15 years. The register collects information about the child within a holistic perspective. The key elements of the register are (a) data concerning newborn hearing screening; (b) data concerning hearing, medical information, hearing amplification and intervention (c) patient reported outcome measures registered by caregivers using three questionnaires; Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children. Results: The register has established four quality indicators regarding newborn hearing screening and early intervention (a) the rate of false positive neonatal screens; (b) testing for congenital cytomegalovirus within 3 weeks of age for children who do not pass newborn hearing screening; (c) audiological evaluation to confirm the hearing status no later than 3 months of age and (d) initiated intervention within 3 months after confirmation of hearing status. Discussion: The register will include the total population of hearing impaired children over long time periods. Thus, the register enables each hospital to monitor their quality indicator scores continuously and compare them with national levels in real time. This facilitates and accelerates identification of improvement areas in the hospitals and will be an important contributor for quality improvement in NHS, diagnostics and hearing intervention for children in Norway. In addition, data from the register will be a unique source for research, and study designs with a long follow-up time can be applied.

Hearing Screening for Congenital CytoMegaloVirus-Exploring Parents' Experiences of Completing Targeted Congenital Cytomegalovirus Screening at the Time of Their Infants' Newborn Hearing Screening.

Background/Objectives: Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is the leading infectious cause of sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental disabilities, with prompt detection (<21 days of life) required to enable accurate diagnosis and anti-viral treatment where clinically appropriate. International guidelines recommend cCMV screening for infants who do not pass their Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS). This study aimed to explore parental experiences of targeted cCMV screening through the UNHS in Victoria, Australia between 2019 and 2020 (HearS-cCMV study). Methods: A qualitative study comprising 18 semi-structured interviews with parents who took saliva swabs from their infants who did not pass their UNHS. A maximum variation sampling strategy was used with data analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Four themes described 18 parents' experiences of cCMV screening: (1) parents' lack of CMV awareness prior to cCMV screening; (2) overall positive experience; (3) varied understanding of CMV post screening; and (4) parents were glad to screen their infant for cCMV. Enablers of targeted cCMV screening included the swab being simple and non-invasive, being easier to complete in the hospital than at home, and the screening being well delivered by the staff. Barriers included a potential increase in anxiety, especially with false positives, and the timing of cCMV screening coinciding with their infant not passing UNHS being difficult for some parents. Conclusions: Parent experiences of targeted cCMV screening were positive. Increasing public knowledge of cCMV and training staff members to complete the CMV swab would reduce the risk of false positives and associated parental anxiety. This would facilitate successful routine targeted cCMV screening.

Newborn concurrent hearing and genetic screening for hearing impairment: A systematic review and meta­analysis.

Hearing loss is the most prevalent neurosensory disorder in humans, with significant implications for language, social and cognitive development if not diagnosed and treated early. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the rate of hearing screening pass and genetic screening failure [universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) pass/genetic failure] and to investigate the advantages of combining newborn hearing and genetic screening for newborn hearing impairment. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 2023 to identify studies reporting the combination of neonatal hearing screening with genetic screening. Duplicate literature, unpublished literature, studies with incomplete data, animal experiments, literature reviews and systematic studies were excluded. All the data were processed by STATA15.1 statistical software. A total of nine cross-sectional studies were included in this meta-analysis. The sample sizes ranged from 1,716 to 180,469, and there were a total of 377,688 participants. The pooled results revealed that the prevalence of passing the UNHS while failing genetic screening was 0.31% (95% CI, 0.22-0.41%). The prevalence of UNHS pass and gap junction protein beta 2 and solute carrier family 26 member 4 variant screen failure was 0.01% (95% CI, 0.00-0.02%) and 0.00% (95% CI, 0.00%), respectively, while the prevalence of mitochondrially encoded 12S RRNA variant screening failure and UNHS pass was 0.21% (95% CI, 0.18-0.26%). Combined screening has a significant advantage over pure hearing screening, especially in terms of identifying newborns with mitochondrial gene mutations that render them sensitive to certain medications. In clinical practice, decision-makers can consider practical circumstances and leverage the benefits of combined newborn hearing and genetic screening for early diagnosis, early counseling, and early intervention in patients with hearing loss.

Reliability of an Android Based Free Application for Assessment of Hearing Loss in Adults.

Hearing loss is an important health care concern. Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA) is considered  Gold Standard for audiometric evaluations though, there exist a huge variance between the demand and the actual services available. As smartphones are mobile, applications are upgradable, results are reproducible, the mobile applications may offer a good screening tool, especially in remote areas. There are many smartphone-based hearing applications which are already in use. However, effectiveness of such applications needs to be validated. To evaluate the reliability of 'Hearing Test' a phone application against PTA for assessment of hearing thresholds in adults. We conducted a diagnostic study on a heterogenous group of 250 individuals irrespective of their hearing levels. The hearing thresholds for both ears were measured by PTA and phone app and then compared statistically. The agreement between the methods were statistically significant with respect to diagnosing hearing loss and the degree of hearing loss. Though, PTA remains Gold Standard for hearing evaluation but freely available,  highly reproducible & specific 'Hearing Test' application could be used as a screening tool in remote areas and may help bridging the gap between the requirement and availability of diagnostic audiometric services.

The Impact of Post-Birth Timing on OAE Test Efficacy: An Observational Analysis of Neonatal Hearing Screening.

Identifying auditory impairments early in newborns is essential to prevent developmental delays. Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) screenings play a critical role in newborn hearing assessments. However, the ideal timing post-birth for these tests remains unclear. This study evaluates the efficacy of OAE screenings within the first five days after birth to determine the most effective timing. An observational study involved 1,013 full-term neonates at a tertiary care centre. These neonates underwent Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) screenings daily from Day 1 to Day 5, following WHO and JCIH guidelines. The study assessed pass rates, false positives, and false negatives, with follow-up screenings at one and three months for neonates with initial ambiguous results. The study found that screening efficiency significantly increased, with Day 1 pass rates at 8% (81 neonates) and 98% (992 neonates) by Day 5, marking a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy (p < 0.001). False positive rates dropped from 92% on Day 1 to 2% by Day 5, and false negatives decreased to below 1%. Sensitivity and specificity reached their peak at 98% and 99.5%, respectively, on Day 5. Our study findings advocate for adjusting neonatal hearing screening protocols to include OAE tests on the fifth day post-birth, optimizing clinical efficacy through enhanced diagnostic accuracy and reducing the logistical and emotional burdens on families and healthcare providers. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-04700-0.

Revisiting the transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions passing criteria used for newborn hearing screening.

OBJECTIVE: To assess transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) data from 15 years of a newborn hearing screening program and evaluate how well various criteria separate ears with and without hearing loss. DESIGN: Retrospective review of TEOAE data using logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves, and cumulative percentage graphs.Study sample: Children with hearing loss who passed TEOAE screening as a newborn were compared to children who failed TEOAE screening and normal hearing children who either passed or failed. Exclusions were applied for acquired hearing loss or auditory neuropathy. RESULTS: Ears with hearing loss that passed screening had significantly lower TEOAE response levels compared to ears with normal hearing. Noise levels, test times, and number of sweeps were also lower. Most of these ears had mild hearing loss. Logistic regression results showed that high-frequency TEOAE response level is the best predictor of hearing loss. A multivariate "logit" score calculated from the regression was the best indicator for separating ears with hearing loss from ears with normal hearing. CONCLUSIONS: TEOAE response levels or an algorithm which incorporates logit scores should be considered as a minimum passing criterion to increase the sensitivity of the TEOAE screening.

Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program in Jordan.

Introduction: The Newborn Hearing Screening (NHS) program was officially launched in Jordan in 2021. Since its inception, no studies have examined the effectiveness of the program. This study seeks to assess the effectiveness and outcomes of the NHS program in Jordan. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the program coverage rate, referral rate, loss to follow-up rate and the hearing status of newborns who successfully completed the necessary diagnostic assessment. Live births in all hospitals administered by the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Jordan from July 2021 to November 2023 were included. Results: Out of 25,825 newborns delivered, 99.4% (25,682) were screened. A referral rate of 0.7% (189) was recorded. Approximately 61.9% of those referred (n = 117) had normal hearing, while 31.7% (60 infants) were diagnosed with hearing loss. The prevalence of congenital hearing loss was 0.14%, and the mean age for identifying hearing loss was 11 months. Discussion: The current status of the NHS program in Jordan is promising. The program has achieved most benchmarks recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH), demonstrating encouraging outcomes. There is a need to investigate and address the factors causing delays in the identification of hearing loss in Jordan.

Newborn and infant hearing screening for early detection of hearing loss in Nairobi, Kenya.

Background: Early detection of hearing loss and subsequent intervention leads to better speech, language and educational outcomes giving way to improved social economic prospects in adult life. This can be achieved through establishing newborn and infant hearing screening programs. Objective: To determine the prevalence of hearing loss in newborns and infants in Nairobi, Kenya. Methods: A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted at the National hospital and at a sub county hospital immunization clinic. A total of 9,963 babies aged 0-3 years, were enrolled in the hearing screening program through convenient sampling over a period of nine months. A case history was administered followed by Distortion Product Oto-acoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) hearing screening. Results: The screening coverage rate was 98.6% (9963/10,104). The referral rate for the initial screen was 3.6% (356/ 9,963), the return rate for follow-up rescreening was 72% (258 babies out of 356) with a lost to follow-up rate of 28% (98/356). The referral rate of the second screen was 10% (26/258). All the 26 babies referred from the second screen returned for diagnostic hearing evaluation and were confirmed with hearing loss, yielding a prevalence of 3/1000. Conclusions: Establishing universal newborn and infant hearing screening programs is essential for early detection and intervention for hearing loss. Data management and efficient follow-up systems are an integral part of achieving diagnostic confirmation of hearing loss and early intervention.