The potential of integrating stereotactic ablative radiotherapy techniques with hyperfractionation for lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Limited literature exists on the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) techniques with hyperfractionated regimens for patients with lung cancer. This study aims to assess whether the SABR technique with hyperfractionation can potentially reduce lung toxicity. METHODS: We utilized the linear-quadratic model to find the optimal fraction to maximize the tumor biological equivalent dose (BED) to normal-tissue BED ratio. Validation was performed by comparing the SABR plans with 50 Gy/5 fractions and hyperfractionationed plans with 88.8 Gy/74 fractions with the same tumor BED and planning criteria for 10 patients with early-stage lung cancer. Mean lung BED, Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), critical volume (CV) criteria (volume below BED of 22.92 and 25.65 Gy, and mean BED for lowest 1000 and 1500 cc) and the percentage of the lung receiving 20Gy or more (V20) were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The transition point occurs when the tumor-to-normal tissue ratio (TNR) of the physical dose equals the TNR of α/ß in the BED dose-volume histogram of the lung. Compared with the hypofractionated regimen, the hyperfractionated regimen is superior in the dose range above but inferior below the transition point. The hyperfractionated regimen showed a lower mean lung BED (6.40 Gy vs. 7.73 Gy) and NTCP (3.50% vs. 4.21%), with inferior results concerning CV criteria and higher V20 (7.37% vs. 7.03%) in comparison with the hypofractionated regimen (p < 0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The hyperfractionated regimen has an advantage in the high-dose region of the lung but a disadvantage in the low-dose region. Further research is needed to determine the superiority between hypo- and hyperfractionation.

Targeting Anterior Commissure Involvement with Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy for T1-T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Glottic Larynx.

Anterior commissure is involved in about 20% of early-stage glottic squamous cell carcinomas (EGSCCs). Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for EGSCC with anterior commissure involvement (ACI) were evaluated by focusing on hyperfractionated radiotherapy (74.4 Gy in 62 fractions). One-hundred and fifty-three patients with T1-T2 EGSCC were included in this study. The median total doses for T1a, T1b, and T2 were 66, 74.4, and 74.4 Gy, respectively. Overall, 49 (32%) patients had T1a, 38 (25%) had T1b, and 66 (43%) had T2 disease. The median treatment duration was 46 days. The median follow-up duration was 5.1 years. The 10-year overall and cause-specific survival rates were 72% and 97%, respectively. The 10-year local control rates were 94% for T1a, 88% for T1b, and 81% for T2 disease. Local control rates in patients with ACI were slightly better than those in patients without ACI with T1a and T1b diseases; however, the difference was not significant. The 10-year laryngeal preservation rate was 96%. Six patients experienced grade 3 mucositis, and four patients had grade 3 dermatitis. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy was effective for T1 disease with ACI, but insufficient for T2 disease with ACI. Our treatment strategy resulted in excellent laryngeal preservation.

Clinical Outcomes of Radiotherapy for Stage 1 Glottic Carcinoma: Comparing Accelerated Hyperfractionation and Once-daily Fractionation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Accelerated hyperfractionation (AHF) is used in head and neck cancer to improve the local control (LC) rate, but reports of outcomes for early-stage GC are limited. The outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) for stage 1 glottic carcinoma (GC) were retrospectively analyzed, comparing AHF and once-daily fractionation (ODF) using 2.0-2.4 Gy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 102 patients with stage 1 GC underwent RT alone between 2007 and 2021, with 43 in the AHF group and 59 in the ODF group. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. RESULTS: The 5-year LC rate was 98% in the AHF group and 91% in the ODF group (p=0.19). During RT, significantly more patients in the AHF group required opioids due to mucositis than in the ODF group (74% vs. 25%, p<0.001), and the rate of aspiration pneumonia tended to be higher in the AHF group than in the ODF group (7% vs. 0%, p=0.072). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the LC rate between AHF and ODF for stage 1 GC. Moreover, the AHF group required opioids at a higher rate and tended to have a higher risk of developing aspiration pneumonia.

Optimization of antitumor radiotherapy fractionation via mathematical modeling with account of 4 R's of radiobiology.

A spatially-distributed continuous mathematical model of solid tumor growth and treatment by fractionated radiotherapy is presented. The model explicitly accounts for the factors, widely referred to as 4 R's of radiobiology, which influence the efficacy of radiotherapy fractionation protocols: tumor cell repopulation, their redistribution in cell cycle, reoxygenation and repair of sublethal damage of both tumor and normal tissues. With the use of special algorithm the fractionation protocols that provide increased tumor control probability, compared to standard clinical protocol, are found for various physiologically-based values of model parameters under the constraints of fixed overall normal tissue damage and maximum admissible fractional dose. In particular, it is shown that significant gain in treatment efficacy can be achieved for tumors of low malignancy by the use of protracted hyperfractionated protocols. The optimized non-uniform protocols are characterized by gradual escalation of fractional doses in their last parts, which start after the levels of oxygen and nutrients significantly elevate throughout the tumor and accelerated tumor proliferation manifests itself, which is a well-known experimental phenomenon.

Radiation dose and fractionation regimen for limited stage small cell lung cancer: a survey of current practice patterns of Chinese radiation oncologists / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective:To investigate the radiation dose and fractionation regimens for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) in Chinese radiation oncologists.Methods:Over 500 radiation oncologists were surveyed through questionnaire for radiation dose and fractionation regimens for LS-SCLC and 216 valid samples were collected for further analysis. All data were collected by online questionnaire designed by WJX software. Data collection and statistical analysis were performed by SPSS 25.0 statistical software. The differences in categorical variables among different groups were analyzed by Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Results:Among 216 participants, 94.9% preferred early concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 69.4% recommended conventional fractionation, 70.8% preferred a total dose of 60 Gy when delivering conventional radiotherapy and 78.7% recommended 45 Gy when administering hyperfractionated radiotherapy.Conclusions:Despite differences in LS-SCLC treatment plans, most of Chinese radiation oncologists prefer to choose 60 Gy conventional fractionated radiotherapy as the main treatment strategy for LS-SCLC patients. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Chinese Medical Association guidelines or expert consensus play a critical role in guiding treatment decision-making.

Hyperfractionated intensity-modulated proton therapy for pharyngeal cancer with variable relative biological effectiveness: A simulation study.

BACKGROUND: The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of proton is considered to be dependent on biological parameters and fractional dose. While hyperfractionated photon therapy was effective in the treatment of patients with head and neck cancers, its effect in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) under the variable RBE has not been investigated in detail. PURPOSE: To study the effect of variable RBE on hyperfractionated IMPT for the treatment of pharyngeal cancer. We investigated the biologically effective dose (BED) to determine the theoretical effective hyperfractionated schedule. METHODS: The treatment plans of three pharyngeal cancer patients were used to define the ΔBED for the clinical target volume (CTV) and soft tissue (acute and late reaction) as the difference between the BED for the altered schedule with variable RBE and conventional schedule with constant RBE. The ΔBED with several combinations of parameters (treatment days, number of fractions, and prescribed dose) was comprehensively calculated. Of the candidate schedules, the one that commonly gave a higher ΔBED for CTV was selected as the resultant schedule. The BED volume histogram was used to compare the influence of variable RBE and fractionation. RESULTS: In the conventional schedule, compared with the constant RBE, the variable RBE resulted in a mean 2.6 and 2.7 Gy reduction of BEDmean for the CTV and soft tissue (acute reaction) of the three plans, respectively. Moreover, the BEDmean for soft tissue (late reaction) increased by 7.4 Gy, indicating a potential risk of increased RBE. Comprehensive calculation of the ΔBED resulted in the hyperfractionated schedule of 80.52 Gy (RBE = 1.1)/66 fractions in 6.5 weeks. When variable RBE was used, compared with the conventional schedule, the hyperfractionated schedule increased the BEDmean for CTV by 7.6 Gy; however, this was associated with a 7.8 Gy increase for soft tissue (acute reaction). The BEDmean for soft tissue (late reaction) decreased by 2.4 Gy. CONCLUSION: The results indicated a potential effect of the variable RBE on IMPT for pharyngeal cancer but with the possibility that hyperfractionation could outweigh this effect. Although biological uncertainties require conservative use of the resultant schedule, hyperfractionation is expected to be an effective strategy in IMPT for pharyngeal cancer.

Practice Patterns of Treatment Strategy of Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Survey of Chinese Oncologists.

Background: Thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) with concurrent chemotherapy is the standard treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). However, there is still a controversy surrounding the treatment strategy especially optimal dosing and fractionation schedule. Current practice patterns among Chinese oncologists are unknown. Materials and Methods: We surveyed 212 Chinese oncologists using a questionnaire including 50 questions designed by experienced oncologists. Questions covered demographic data, treatment recommendations, and self-assessed knowledge of guidelines or key clinical trials for SCLC. The chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were utilized to describe the result of the study. Results: The response rate was 97% (207/212). Of all the respondents, 69% preferred TRT QD, 29% preferred BID, and 2% chose HFRT. For those who prefer TRT QD, 72% preferred a total dose of 60 Gy, followed by 15% opting for 66 Gy, 12% for <60 Gy, and 1% for 70 Gy. Of those who prefer BID, 79% preferred a total dose of 45 Gy, with 4% choosing 30 Gy, 8% choosing 50 Gy, 7% choosing 54 Gy, and 2% choosing >54 Gy. Regarding PCI, 82% of participants believed that PCI should be performed when treatment is completed and 13% believed that PCI should begin immediately after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. As for other therapies, 26% of participants choose concurrent anti-angiogenic therapy during SCLC treatment, and 49% recommended small-molecule TKI as the main anti-angiogenic therapy. Conclusion: Substantial variation exists in how Chinese oncologists approach TRT dosing and fractionation for LS-SCLC. Almost 70% of respondents reported administering TRT QD more often in daily work. The most common doses were 60 Gy QD and 45 Gy BID.

Neurocognitive function and survival in children with average-risk medulloblastoma treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy alone: Long-term mature outcomes of a prospective study.

Background: The purpose of this study was to report long-term neurocognitive and clinical outcomes in children treated for average-risk medulloblastoma with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) alone. Methods: Between 2006 and 2010, 20 children with rigorously staged average-risk medulloblastoma were treated on a prospective study with HFRT without upfront adjuvant systemic chemotherapy after written informed consent. HFRT was delivered as twice-daily fractions (1 Gy/fraction, 6-8 hours apart, 5 days/week) to craniospinal axis (36 Gy/36 fractions) plus conformal tumor-bed boost (32 Gy/32 fractions). Neurocognitive function was assessed at baseline and periodically on follow-up using age-appropriate intelligence quotient (IQ) scales. Results: Median age was 8 years (range 5-14 years) with 70% being males. Mean and standard deviation (SD) scores at baseline were 90.5 (SD = 17.08), 88 (SD = 16.82) and 88 (SD = 17.24) for Verbal Quotient (VQ), Performance Quotient (PQ), and Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) respectively. Mean scores remained stable in the short-to-medium term but declined gradually beyond 5 years with borderline statistical significance for VQ (P = .042), but nonsignificant decline in PQ (P = .259) and FSIQ (P = .108). Average rate of neurocognitive decline was <1 IQ point per year over a 10-year period. Regression analysis stratified by age, gender, and baseline FSIQ failed to demonstrate any significant impact of the tested covariates on longitudinal neurocognitive function. At a median follow-up of 145 months, 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival and overall survival were 63.2% and 74.1% respectively. Conclusion: HFRT alone without upfront adjuvant chemotherapy in children with average-risk medulloblastoma is associated with modest decline in neurocognitive functioning with acceptable long-term survival outcomes and may be most appropriate for resource-constrained settings.

Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerance of Radical Radiotherapy and Radiochemotherapy in Treatment of Locally Advanced, Unresectable Rectal Cancer.

Background: A retrospective evaluation of tolerance and efficacy of two schemes of neoadjuvant treatment in patients (pts) with unresectable rectal cancer: radiochemotherapy (CRT) and radiotherapy (RT), including conventional and accelerated hyperfractionation. Material and Method: A total of 145 consecutive pts with unresectable, locally advanced rectal cancer. The schemes used are RT in 73 (50%) or CRT in 72 (50%). In CRT, 54 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions was given with chemotherapy, In the RT group, conventional fractionation (CFRT) and hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART). HART was introduced at first as an alternative to CFRT, after radiobiological studies suggesting a therapeutic gain of hyperfractionation in other cancers, and second to administer relatively high dose needed in unresectable cancer, which is not feasible in hypofractionation because of critical organs sensitivity to high fraction doses (fd). HART was an alternative option in pts with medical contraindications to chemotherapy and to shorten overall treatment time with greater radiobiological effectiveness than CFRT. Results: Objective response (OR) in the RT and CRT group was 60% versus 75%. Resection rate (RR) in RT and CRT: 37% versus 65%. Tumor mobility and laparotomy-based unresectability were significant factors for OR. Performance status (PS), tumor mobility, and neoadjuvant treatment method were significant for RR.

Proton Image-guided Radiation Assignment for Therapeutic Escalation via Selection of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients [PIRATES]: A Phase I safety and feasibility trial of MRI-guided adaptive particle radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation dose-escalation for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients aiming to improve cure rates is challenging due to the increased risk of unacceptable treatment-induced toxicities. With "Proton Image-guided Radiation Assignment for Therapeutic Escalation via Selection of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients" (PIRATES), we present a novel treatment approach that is designed to facilitate dose-escalation while minimizing the risk of dose-limiting toxicities for locally advanced HPV-negative HNC patients. The aim of this Phase I trial is to assess the safety & feasibility of PIRATES approach. METHODS: The PIRATES protocol employs a multi-faceted dose-escalation approach to minimize the risk of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): 1) sparing surrounding normal tissue from extraneous dose with intensity-modulated proton therapy, 2) mid-treatment hybrid hyper-fractionation for radiobiologic normal tissue sparing; 3) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) guided mid-treatment boost volume adaptation, and 4) iso-effective restricted organ-at-risk dosing to mucosa and bone tissues.The time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval (TITE-BOIN) design is employed to address the challenge of the long DLT window of 6 months and find the maximum tolerated dose. The primary endpoint is unacceptable radiation-induced toxicities (Grade 4, mucositis, dermatitis, or Grade 3 myelopathy, osteoradionecrosis) occurring within 6 months following radiotherapy. The second endpoint is any grade 3 toxicity occurring in 3-6 months after radiation. DISCUSSION: The PIRATES dose-escalation approach is designed to provide a safe avenue to intensify local treatment for HNC patients for whom therapy with conventional radiation dose levels is likely to fail. PIRATES aims to minimize the radiation damage to the tissue surrounding the tumor volume with the combination of proton therapy and adaptive radiotherapy and within the high dose tumor volume with hybrid hyper-fractionation and not boosting mucosal and bone tissues. Ultimately, if successful, PIRATES has the potential to safety increase local control rates in HNC patients with high loco-regional failure risk.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04870840; Registration date: May 4, 2021.Netherlands Trial Register ID: NL9603; Registration date: July 15, 2021.

Accelerated hyper-versus normofractionated radiochemotherapy with temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The standard treatment of glioblastoma patients consists of surgery followed by normofractionated radiotherapy (NFRT) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. Whether accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) yields comparable results to NFRT in combination with temozolomide has only sparsely been investigated. The objective of this study was to compare NFRT with HFRT in a multicenter analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 484 glioblastoma patients from four centers were retrospectively pooled and analyzed. Three-hundred-ten and 174 patients had been treated with NFRT (30 × 1.8 Gy or 30 × 2 Gy) and HFRT (37 × 1.6 Gy or 30 × 1.8 Gy twice/day), respectively. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) which was correlated with patient-, tumor- and treatment-related variables via univariable and multivariable Cox frailty models. For multivariable modeling, missing covariates were imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations, and a sensitivity analysis was performed on the complete-cases-only dataset. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 0.8-88.6 months), median OS was 16.9 months (15.0-18.7 months) in the NFRT group and 14.9 months (13.2-17.3 months) in the HFRT group (p = 0.26). In multivariable frailty regression, better performance status, gross-total versus not gross-total resection, MGMT hypermethylation, IDH mutation, smaller planning target volume and salvage therapy were significantly associated with longer OS (all p < 0.01). Treatment differences (HFRT versus NFRT) had no significant effect on OS in either univariable or multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Since HFRT with temozolomide was not associated with worse OS, we assume HFRT to be a potential option for patients wishing to shorten their treatment time.

Comparison of Three Fractionation Schedules in Radiotherapy for Early Glottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radiotherapy is widely accepted as the treatment of choice for early glottic squamous cell carcinoma (EGSCC), although it varies greatly with respect to dose, dose per fraction, and treatment techniques. The study aim was to evaluate the use of accelerated fractionation strategy (AFS) for EGSCC in standard clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for EGSCC between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively identified and received either conventional fractionation, hypofractionation, or hyperfractionation. RESULTS: One hundred six patients were analyzed, and 19, 71, and 16 patients underwent conventional fractionation, hypofractionation, and hyperfractionation, respectively. The median follow-up was 56 months. The 5-year local control and overall survival rates were 79% and 83%; 78% and 79%; and 87% and 77%, respectively, and no significant difference was observed between the fractionation schedules. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirmed the utility of AFS in standard clinical practice and support its use for patients with EGSCC.

A comparative study of concomitant boost radiation versus concomitant boost with concurrent chemoradiation versus standard fractionation chemoradiation in locally advanced head-and-neck cancer.

CONTEXT: As the number of head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients are high in our subcontinent, the study was designed to reduce the treatment time and increase efficacy. AIMS: Comparative evaluation of the efficacy, toxicity, local control, and survival of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT), CBRT with concurrent chemoradiation (CBRT + CCT) and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (CFRT + CCT) in locally advanced HNC (LAHNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with LAHNC were randomly assigned to 3-groups of 30-patients each. Group I (CBRT) received, 45 Gy/25#/5-weeks and 18 Gy/10# concomitant boost in the last 2-week of treatment, receiving a total dose of 63 Gy. Group II (CBRT + CCT) received CBRT with concomitant cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on day 1, 17, and 34. Group III (CFRT + CCT) received 64 Gy/32#/6.2 weeks, concurrent with injection cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 on day 1, 22, and 42. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Stata 9.0 SPSS and Chi-square test were used for analysis and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 8.2 months. At last follow-up, locoregional control was 36%, 57%, and 40% and DFS was seen in 33%, 53%, and 40% of patients in Group I, II, and III, respectively. Grade-3 cutaneous reactions were significantly higher in Group-II as compared to that of Group-III (P = 0.033) and Group-I (P = 0.715). CONCLUSION: All three groups have similar response rates and DFS with manageable toxicity.

Long-term outcome comparison for standard fractionation (>59 Gy) versus hyperfractionated (>45 Gy) radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is commonly employed in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC); however, the optimal radiotherapy regimen is still unknown. This 3-institution analysis compares long-term disease control and survival outcomes for once- (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) radiotherapy at contemporary doses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were collected for LS-SCLC patients treated with platinum-based CCRT and planned RT doses of >5940 cGy at >180 cGy QD or >4500 cGy at 150 cGy BID. Comparative outcome analyses were performed for treatment groups. RESULTS: From 2005 through 2014, 132 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis (80 QD, 52 BID). Treatment groups were well-balanced, excepting higher rate of advanced mediastinal staging, longer interval from biopsy to treatment initiation, and lower rate of prophylactic cranial irradiation for the QD group, as well as institutional practice variation. At median survivor follow-up of 33.5 months (range, 4.6-105.8), 80 patients experienced disease failure (44 QD, 36 BID), and 106 died (62 QD, 44 BID). No differences in disease control or survival were demonstrated between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The present analysis did not detect a difference in disease control or survival outcomes for contemporary dose QD versus BID CCRT in LS-SCLC.

DAHANCA 28: A phase I/II feasibility study of hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin and nimorazole (HART-CN) for patients with locally advanced, HPV/p16-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx and oral cavity.

BACKGROUND: A phase I-II study to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of intensified, primary radiotherapy (RT) for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LAHNSCC) employing dose escalation by hyperfractionation, acceleration of treatment time, concomitant chemotherapy and hypoxic modification. METHODS: Patients with HPV/p16- LAHNSCC receiving primary hyperfractionated, accelerated RT, 76 Gy/56 fx, 10 fx/week for 5½ weeks, concomitant weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) and nimorazole (HART-CN) were included. Primary endpoint was locoregional failure (LRF). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: 50 patients received HART-CN from 2013 to 2017. Median age was 60 years. Most patients had stage IV hypo- or oropharynx cancer with a heavy smoking history. All oropharyngeal cancers were HPV/p16-negative. Ninety-eight percent of patients completed RT, but compliance to cisplatin and nimorazole was lower. Median observation time was 44 months. LRF was diagnosed in 10 patients. All LRFs were in the high-dose CTV. The 3-year actuarial LRF was 21%, and OS was 74%. The peak incidence of acute toxicity showed that 67% of patients experienced severe dysphagia, 61% severe mucositis, and 78% were equipped with feeding tubes. Late severe morbidity was seen in 7 of 29 recurrence-free patients with at least 3 years of followup, who presented with either severe dysphagia (n = 2), severe xerostomia (n = 1), severe fibrosis of the neck (n = 3) or osteoradionecrosis (n = 1). Three were still tube dependent. CONCLUSION: HART-CN is feasible in patients with HPV/p16- LAHNSCC in good health. Although acute toxicity was pronounced, the proportion of patients with late toxicity was acceptable and outcome at 3 years encouraging.

Late-course accelerated Hyperfractionation vs. Conventional Fraction Radiotherapy under precise technology plus Concurrent Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: comparison of efficacy and side effects.

Background: The accelerated reproliferation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after radiation contributes to conventional fraction radiotherapy (CFRT) failure. Late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (LCAHFRT) can improve the long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients in China but is associated with a high rate of side effects due to the large exposure field of two-dimensional treatment and drug toxicity. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can increase the tumor dose while decreasing the normal tissue dose. Therefore, we compared the outcomes and side effects of LCAHFIMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy (CT) and CFIMRT plus CT for ESCC. Methods and Materials: Between 2013 and 2016, 114 eligible patients with ESCC were recruited and randomly assigned to receive LCAHFIMRT+CT (58 patients) or CFIMRT+CT (56 patients) by a linear accelerator (6-MV X-ray) under image guidance. Two cycles of CT with cisplatin and docetaxel were also administered. Results: The complete response (CR) rates were 79.3% and 61.8% in the LCAHFIMRT+CT and CFIMRT+CT groups, respectively (P=0.041). The median duration of local control times was 31.0±1.9 months for the LCAHFIMRT+CT group and 24.0±3.3 months for the CFIMRT+CT groups,and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control rates were 86.2%, 63.8%, and 41.4% and 85.7%, 51.8%, and 32.1% for the LCAHFIMRT+CT and CFIMRT+CT groups (P=0.240), respectively. The median survival times were 34.0±1.1 months for the LCAHFIMRT+CT group and 28.0.0±3.7 months for the CFIMRT groups,and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 87.9%, 74.1%, and 44.8% and 87.5%, 60.7%, and 39.3% for the LCAHFIMRT+CT and CFIMRT+CT groups, respectively (P=0.405). The incidence of side effects was not significantly different between the two groups. Local recurrence and uncontrolled disease resulted in more deaths in the CFIMRT+CT group than in the LCAHFIMRT+CT group (58.9% vs. 39.7%) (P=0.040). Conclusion: For ESCC patients, LCAHFRT delivered by image-guided intensity-modulated techniques Plus Concurrent Chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel keeps safety and high CR rate, as well as local control and long-term survival rates.

Durable therapeutic gain despite competing mortality in long-term follow-up of a randomized hyperfractionated radiotherapy trial for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To examine the therapeutic ratio and mortality profile over time in a radiotherapy randomized trial in stage III-IV larynx/pharynx cancer with long-term follow-up. MATERIALS/METHODS: From 1988 to 1995, 331 cases were randomized to either hyperfractionated (HF) (58 Gy/40 fractions, twice daily) or conventional (CF) (51 Gy/20 fractions, once daily) radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), locoregional (LRC), distant control (DC), ≥Grade 3 late toxicity (LT), and relative mortality risk profile over time were compared between both arms. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 13.6 years. HF had a 10% improved OS at 5-years (40% vs 30%, p = 0.04), but the benefit diminished to 3% at 10-years (21% vs 18%). A trend towards higher LRC with HF remained (5-year: 49% vs 40%; 10-year: 49% vs 39%, p = 0.05). DC rates were unchanged (5-year: 87% vs 85%; 10-year: 87 vs 84%, p = 0.56). LT rates were similar (HF vs CF: 5-year: 9% vs 12%; 10-year: 11% vs 14%, p = 0.27). Multivariable analysis confirmed that HF reduced mortality risk by 31% [HR 0.69 (0.55-0.88), p < 0.01] and locoregional failure risk by 35% [HR 0.65 (0.48-0.89), p < 0.01]. Index cancer mortality (5-year: 46% vs 51%; 10-year: 49% vs 55%) was lower in the HF arm. Competing mortality (mostly smoking-related) was also numerically lower with HF at 5-years (14% vs 19%) but became similar at 10-years (30% vs 28%). CONCLUSIONS: This trial confirms that HF with augmented total dose has a durable 10% effect size on LRC with comparable LT. OS benefit is evident at 5-years (10%) but relative mortality risk profile changes in longer follow-up.

Lymphopenia association with accelerated hyperfractionation and its effects on limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients' clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: An assessment of trends in lung cancer patient survival is very important to determine the outcomes and to modulate where advancements should be made. This study investigated whether the absolute lymphocyte count just after chemoradiation (after-ALC) and 3 months after chemoradiation initiation (post-ALC) could predict limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients' clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 304 patients who were newly diagnosed with LS-SCLC and received treatment with chemoradiation (CRT). Finally we collected data at the time of pretreatment, after-ALC and post-ALC from 226 patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank statistics were used to assess the prognostic significance of after-ALC and post-ALC for survival rates. Cox proportional hazards models were used to generate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-six patients had a documented ALC pretreatment, just after CRT and 3 months after CRT. Relative lymphopenia of pre-treatment ALC was in 47.8% of patients, whereas the lymphopenia (<655 cells/mm3) proportion was increased to 61.1% just after CRT, and the lymphopenia (<1,430 cells/mm3) proportion continued to rise to 70.4% at the time of 3 months after initiating CRT. After-ALC lymphopenia patients showed inferior median OS (18.1 vs. 36.0 months, P<0.001) and similar PFS (9.7 vs. 26.2 months, P<0.001) compared to patients without lymphopenia. Multivariate analysis demonstrated after-ALC <655 cells/mm3 and post-ALC <1,430 cells/mm3 (HR: 1.339; P=0.038) had a 105% and 33% (HR: 2.056; P<0.001) increase in hazards of death respectively. Similarly, after-ALC <655 cells/mm3 and post-ALC <1,430 cells/mm3 had a 160% (HR: 2.606; P=0.002) and 40% (HR: 1.409; P=0.015) increase in hazards of progression respectively. Furthermore, hyperfractionated RT showed more likely to cause lymphopenia in patients than conventional fractionated RT. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of LS-SCLC patients treatment with CRT experienced severe lymphopenia and more than half patients exhibited prolonged lymphopenia. Statistical significance that lymphopenia after treatment was associated with decreased survival was obviously observed. Further study is warranted, given that explanation lymphopenia is a mechanism for shorter survival or just a predictor.

Twice-daily Radiation for Metastatic Malignant Melanoma: A Different Approach Resulting in a Significant Response.

The aim of this study was to discern an abscopal effect by modifying the delivery of radiation for metastatic malignant melanoma. The effect would be directly evident with visible/radiographic regression of the disease and indirectly shown with an overall extension in survival and potential cure. Patients with locally advanced, metastatic palpable, or radiographic visible metastatic malignant melanoma were treated with twice-daily radiation therapy using a dose range of 100-135 centigray (cGy) per fraction. A 100% complete response/continued regression with no recurrence was achieved within the region of delivery for every patient so treated. Of those alive at three years, few demonstrate a progression of the disease. These results were achieved without the use of immunotherapy, created few side effects, and were accomplished at a fraction of the alternative's cost. Evidence of an immune-mediated response (abscopal effect) was commonly seen. Treatment was administered within acceptable dose ranges, historically used twice daily for other malignancies known to be sensitive to the effects of radiation.

A current review of dose-escalated radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Background The mainstay therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Loco-regional recurrence constitutes the predominant failure patterns. Previous studies confirmed the relationship between increased biological equivalent doses and improved overall survival. However, the large randomized phase III study, RTOG 0617, failed to demonstrate the benefit of dose-escalation to 74 Gy compared with 60 Gy by simply increasing fraction numbers. Conclusions Though effective dose-escalation methods have been explored, including altered fractionation, adapting individualized increments for different patients, and adopting new technologies and new equipment such as new radiation therapy, no consensus has been achieved yet.