Redeployment of ophthalmologists in the United Kingdom during the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: During the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some ophthalmologists across the United Kingdom (UK) have been redeployed to areas of need across the National Health Service (NHS). This survey was performed to assess aspects of this process including training & education, tasks expected, availability of personal protection equipment (PPE) used and the overall anxiety of ophthalmologists around their redeployment. METHOD: Online anonymous survey around the existing guidance on safe redeployment of secondary care NHS staff and PPE use by NHS England and Public Health England respectively. The survey was open to all ophthalmologists across the UK irrespective of their redeployment status. FINDINGS: 145 surveys were completed and returned during a 2-week period between 17th April 2020 and 1st May 2020, when 52% of ophthalmologists were redeployed. The majority of this group consisted of ophthalmologists in training (79%). 81% of those redeployed were assigned to areas of the hospital where patients with confirmed Coronavirus disease were being treated as inpatients. There was a statistically significant improvement in anxiety level following redeployment which was mainly attributed to the support received by staff within the redeployed area. 71% of the redeployed group were found to have sufficient PPE was provided for the area they worked in. INTERPRETATION: This is the first national survey performed on redeployment of ophthalmologists in the UK. The study showed that ophthalmologists across all grades were able to contribute in most aspects of patient care. Anxiety of redeployment was reduced by prior training and good support in the redeployment area.

Controlling nosocomial infection in adult intensive treatment unit: A quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infection is a significant burden on healthcare facilities. Its multifactorial nature renders it challenging to control. However, quality healthcare necessitates a safer service that poses no harm to the patient. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project was to reduce the infection rates in the adult ITU to the benchmark levels. METHOD: We conducted an internal audit as a result of the high infection rates in the adult ITU. The audit started with root cause analysis using the fishbone quality tool. FOCUS-PDCA quality tool was used to design the framework. We introduced a change in the staff uniform laundry and organized a campaign to improve hand hygiene compliance using a multimodality approach. Moreover, we conducted training on aseptic techniques in ventilation, urinary catheter, and central lines insertion. Finally, we changed the ventilator filter to a higher quality brand which meets the standard specifications. Infection rates were monitored before and after the proposed changes. RESULTS: There was a marked reduction in ventilator-associated pneumonia; however, it did not reach the benchmark rates. Catheter line-associated bloodstream infection declined from above to below the benchmark. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates were below the benchmark; however, they showed a noticeable reduction. Hand hygiene adherence showed an improvement from 80% to 84%. However, this was below the predetermined target level of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital laundry of staff uniforms is safer to control nosocomial infections. A multimodal approach is necessary to improve hand hygiene adherence and adoption of aseptic techniques. Quality improvement is a continuous process.

Outcomes and risk factors of cholecystectomy in high risk patients: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Many studies looked at outcomes and risk factors in laparoscopic cholecystectomies in general, including a few studies on risk factors and scoring systems in predicting conversion to open surgery. Little data has been produced on high-risk patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Identifying risk factors in this group could help stratify decision making regarding best management strategies.The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomies in patients with ASA 3 and 4. METHODS: Data was collected and collated from a prospectively maintained database of all laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by 13 general surgeons in a single unit. Case notes were reviewed for all patients with ASA 3 and 4 between 2013 and 2017. Data analysis was performed using R studio v 3.4. RESULTS: 244 cases were reviewed. Common bile duct was dilated in 52 cases (21.31%). Gall bladder wall was thick in 102 (41.8%) of the patients. Surgery was elective in 203 (83.2%) of the patients. ERCP was performed in 41 (16.9%) of the patients prior to surgery. 150 patients (62.2%) stayed for 1 day while 36 (14.9%) stayed for 2 days and the remaining 55 (22.9%) stayed for 3 days or more. Complications occurred in 37 (15.16%) of the patients while 23 (9.43%) of the patients were readmitted. 7 patients (2.87%) returned to theatre and 8 (3.28%) stayed in ITU post-op. Two patients died (0.82%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomies in higher risk populations are safe. Alternative methods such as cholecystostomy and ERCP may be of benefit in these patients.

Evidence-based guides in tracheostomy use in critical patients

Objetivos: Proporcionar guías de traqueostomía para el paciente crítico, basadas en la evidencia científica disponible, y facilitar la identificación de áreas en las cuales se requieren mayores estudios. Métodos: Un grupo de trabajo formado con representantes de 10 países pertenecientes a la Federación Panamericana e Ibérica de Sociedades de Medicina Crítica y Terapia Intensiva y a la Latin American Critical Care Trial Investigators Network(LACCTIN) desarrollaron estas recomendaciones basadas en el sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Resultados: El grupo identificó 23 preguntas relevantes entre las 87 preguntas planteadas inicialmente. En la búsqueda inicial de la literatura se identificaron 333 estudios, de los cuales se escogieron un total de 226. El equipo de trabajo generó un total de 19 recomendaciones: 10 positivas (1B = 3, 2C = 3, 2D = 4) y 9 negativas (1B = 8, 2C = 1). En 6 ocasiones no se pudieron establecer recomendaciones. Conclusión: La traqueostomía percutánea se asocia a menor riesgo de infecciones en comparación con la traqueostomía quirúrgica. La traqueostomía precoz solo parece reducir la duración de la ventilación mecánica pero no la incidencia de neumonía, la duración de la estancia hospitalaria o la mortalidad a largo plazo. La evidencia no apoya el uso de broncoscopia de forma rutinaria ni el uso de máscara laríngea durante el procedimiento. Finalmente, el entrenamiento adecuado previo es tanto o más importante que la técnica utilizada para disminuir las complicaciones.(AU)

OBJECTIVES: Provide evidence based guidelines for tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients and identify areas needing further research. METHODS: A task force composed of representatives of 10 member countries of the Pan-American and Iberic Federation of Societies of Critical and Intensive Therapy Medicine and of the Latin American Critical Care Trial Investigators Network developed recommendations based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: The group identified 23 relevant questions among 87 issues that were initially identified. In the initial search, 333 relevant publications were identified of which 226 publications were chosen. The task force generated a total of 19 recommendations: 10 positive (1B=3, 2C=3, 2D=4) and 9 negative (1B=8, 2C=1). A recommendation was not possible in six questions. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous techniques are associated with a lower risk of infections compared to surgical tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy only seems to reduce the duration of ventilator use but not the incidence of pneumonia, the length of stay, or the long-term mortality rate. The evidence does not support the use of routine bronchoscopy guidance or laryngeal masks during the procedure. Finally, proper prior training is as important or even a more significant factor in reducing complications than the technique used.(AU)

Evidence-based guides in tracheostomy use in critical patients. / Guías basadas en la evidencia para el uso de traqueostomía en el paciente crítico.

OBJECTIVES: Provide evidence based guidelines for tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients and identify areas needing further research. METHODS: A task force composed of representatives of 10 member countries of the Pan-American and Iberic Federation of Societies of Critical and Intensive Therapy Medicine and of the Latin American Critical Care Trial Investigators Network developed recommendations based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS: The group identified 23 relevant questions among 87 issues that were initially identified. In the initial search, 333 relevant publications were identified of which 226 publications were chosen. The task force generated a total of 19 recommendations: 10 positive (1B=3, 2C=3, 2D=4) and 9 negative (1B=8, 2C=1). A recommendation was not possible in six questions. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous techniques are associated with a lower risk of infections compared to surgical tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy only seems to reduce the duration of ventilator use but not the incidence of pneumonia, the length of stay, or the long-term mortality rate. The evidence does not support the use of routine bronchoscopy guidance or laryngeal masks during the procedure. Finally, proper prior training is as important or even a more significant factor in reducing complications than the technique used.

Volatile Biomarkers in Breath Associated With Liver Cirrhosis - Comparisons of Pre- and Post-liver Transplant Breath Samples.

BACKGROUND: The burden of liver disease in the UK has risen dramatically and there is a need for improved diagnostics. AIMS: To determine which breath volatiles are associated with the cirrhotic liver and hence diagnostically useful. METHODS: A two-stage biomarker discovery procedure was used. Alveolar breath samples of 31 patients with cirrhosis and 30 healthy controls were mass spectrometrically analysed and compared (stage 1). 12 of these patients had their breath analysed after liver transplant (stage 2). Five patients were followed longitudinally as in-patients in the post-transplant period. RESULTS: Seven volatiles were elevated in the breath of patients versus controls. Of these, five showed statistically significant decrease post-transplant: limonene, methanol, 2-pentanone, 2-butanone and carbon disulfide. On an individual basis limonene has the best diagnostic capability (the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) is 0.91), but this is improved by combining methanol, 2-pentanone and limonene (AUROC curve 0.95). Following transplant, limonene shows wash-out characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Limonene, methanol and 2-pentanone are breath markers for a cirrhotic liver. This study raises the potential to investigate these volatiles as markers for early-stage liver disease. By monitoring the wash-out of limonene following transplant, graft liver function can be non-invasively assessed.

Spray-on-skin cells in burns: a common practice with no agreed protocol.

OBJECTIVES: Cultured epithelial autograft (CEA) has been used for skin coverage after burn wound excision since 1981. It is used in burn units and centres throughout the U.K.; however, there appears to be no agreed standards of practice. We aimed to investigate the experience and current practice with its usage in the management of acute burn injury. METHODS: An online survey was sent to twenty-five burns consultants in the U.K., who are members of the British Burn Association. RESULTS: We received 14 responses. Rarely have the responders agreed to the same practice in most of the questions. Different choices were given by responders with regards the indications for cell culture, techniques used, primary and secondary dressings used, first wound review timing, and measures used to evaluate outcomes. CONCLUSION: In the current economic environment, the NHS needs to rationalize services on the basis of cost effectiveness. CEA is an expensive procedure that requires an adequately sterile laboratory, special equipments and highly experienced dedicated staff. When dealing with expensive management options, it is important to have an agreed protocol that can form the standard that can be referred to when auditing practices and results to improve burn management and patients' care.