Role of Transcranial Ultrasound and Doppler Studies to Evaluate Intracranial Pathologies in Preterm and High-risk Term Neonates.

Background: Transcranial grayscale neurosonography (NSG) and Doppler studies have major role in diagnosing neonate intracranial pathologies. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of NSG and Doppler studies in correlation with clinical hypotonia and seizures in preterm neonates and high-risk term neonates. The prevalence of intracranial pathology is the second aim of this study. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was done in a tertiary care teaching hospital for 2 years. The study population of 120 cases comprised two groups: one group of 60 preterm neonates and the other of 60 high-risk term neonates with a history of well-defined episode of fetal distress. The NSG and Doppler findings (resistance index ≤0.62 is the optimum cutoff point for diagnosing perinatal asphyxia) are recorded. The sensitivity and specificity values for the NSG study alone, the Doppler study alone, and the combined NSG and Doppler studies are calculated. Results: The majority (46%) of preterm neonates had presented with germinal matrix hemorrhage, whereas a majority (46%) of high-risk term neonates had presented with periventricular and subcortical cysts. Comparison of the sensitivity of NSG versus Doppler versus combined NSG and Doppler in evaluating hypotonia and seizures in preterm (P = 0.0442) and high-risk term neonates (P = 0.0399) was significant. Conclusion: NSG combined with the Doppler study has significantly higher sensitivity than NSG alone in both groups. The specificity of the Doppler study is also high in both groups. Thus, it is strongly recommended to include Doppler during every NSG study to increase the detection rate.

Diagnostic Yield of Stereotactic Brain Biopsy in a Sub-Saharan Tertiary Center: A Comprehensive 10-Year Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic brain biopsy is a crucial minimally invasive surgical technique leveraged to obtain tissue specimens from deep-seated intracranial lesions, offering a safer alternative to open craniotomy for patients who cannot tolerate the latter. Despite its effectiveness, the diagnostic yield varies across different centers and has not been widely studied in Sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on 67 consecutive stereotactic brain biopsy procedures carried out by experienced neurosurgeons between January 2012 and December 2022 at a tertiary center in Sub-Saharan Africa. Preoperative clinical status, biopsy type, postoperative complication rate, and histological diagnosis were meticulously analyzed. Factors associated with negative biopsy results were identified using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSS version for Mac, with Fisher exact test employed to detect differences in patient characteristics. Statistical significance was pegged at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic yield rate was 67%. Major contributors to negative biopsy outcomes were superficial location of the lesion, lesion size less than 10 cc, and the use of the Cape Town Stereotactic System. Enhanced yield rates of up to 93% were realized through the application of magnetic resonance imaging-based images, Stealth Station 7, and frozen section analysis. No correlation was observed between the number of cores obtained and the yield rate. Procedure complications were negligible, and no procedure-related mortality was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic yield rate from our study was somewhat lower than previously reported in contemporary literature, primarily attributed to the differing definitions of diagnostic yield, the dominant use of the older framed Cape Town Stereotactic System, computed tomography-based imaging, and the absence of intraoperative frozen section. Nevertheless, biopsies conducted using the frameless system were comparable with studies from other global regions. Our findings reaffirm that stereotactic brain biopsy when complemented with magnetic resonance imaging-based imaging, frameless stereotactic systems and intraoperative frozen section is a safe, effective, and reliable method for obtaining histological diagnosis.

MRI evaluation of cranial pathologies in rapidly progressive early puberty cases aged 8-9.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and distribution of intracranial pathologies in female patients between 8 and 9 years of age who were diagnosed with early puberty (rapidly progressive) through the evaluation of MRI images. Materials and methods: A total of 74 female patients diagnosed with central precocious puberty (CPP) (6-8 years) and rapidly progressive early puberty (RPEP) (8-9 years) were included in the study. The patients were categorized into two groups, normal and abnormal, based on the findings from their MRI scans. Recent literature has classified abnormal MRI findings into three groups: pathological findings, findings with a questionable relationship to CPP, and incidental findings. Furthermore, the patients were divided into four groups based on their MRI findings and whether they had CPP or RPEP : CPP (6-8 years) +Normal MRI, RPEP (8-9 years) + Normal MRI, CPP (6-8 years) +Abnormal MRI, RPEP (8-9 years) +Abnormal MRI. Results: Out of the 74 girls included in the study, 54% (n=40) showed normal MRI results, while abnormal MRI findings were detected in 46% (n = 34) of the cases. No malignant lesions were identified among cases with abnormal MRI findings. The occurrence of abnormal MRI findings was observed in 46% of the PP group and 45% of the RPEP group. Incidental findings were the most common MRI findings in both groups. The proportion of cases with pathological findings and findings with a questionable relationship to CPP was similar in both groups (p = 0.06). Basal luteinizing hormone (LH) concentration was found to be higher in the RPEP (8-9 years) +Abnormal MRI group compared to the CPP (6-8 years) +Normal MRI group (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Our study is the first to investigate MRI findings in cases of rapidly progressive early puberty in the age range of 8-9 years. Our study demonstrates that there is no difference in terms of intracranial findings between cases of precocious puberty at the age of 6-8 years and cases of rapidly progressive early puberty aged 8-9.