Síndrome del uno y medio secundario a ataque cerebrovascular isquémico vertebrobasilar / One and half syndrome after ischemic vertebrobasilar stroke

El síndrome del uno y medio es una entidad que se caracteriza por parálisis de la mirada conjugada horizontal y alteración del fascículo longitudinal medial (FLM) ipsilateral secundario a diversas etiologías, entre las que se incluye el ataque cerebrovascular (ACV). Se describen dos casos de pacientes que consultaron por hemiparesia, incapacidad para realizar movimientos horizontales en uno de los ojos y abducción forzada del ojo contralateral e imposibilidad para la aducción. En ambos casos los estudios demostraron la presencia de un ACV isquémico vertebrobasilar como origen del síndrome; el reconocimiento de la fisiología de la mirada conjugada es fundamental en el abordaje del paciente y permite realizar un diagnóstico exacto a partir de una historia clínica detallada y una evaluación física minuciosa.

The One and a Half Syndrome is a condition characterized by paralysis of the horizontal conjugate gaze and a ipsilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia secondary to other processes such as a stroke. We describe two cases of patients that had hemiparesis, inability to perform horizontal movements in one eye and forced abduction of the contralateral eye with inability to adduct it. With the corresponding study of both cases it was possible to diagnose a vertebrobasilar ischemic stroke as the origin of the syndrome; the recognition and understanding of the physiology of the conjugate gaze is crucial in the approach of the patients and allow an accurate diagnosis using a detailed history and a thorough physical evaluation.

[Vertebrobasilar recanalization techniques before the placement of stent-retrievers: reopening is not synonymous with good outcome]. / Técnicas de recanalización vertebrobasilar antes de la introducción de las endoprótesis recuperadoras: la reapertura no es sinónimo de buena evolución.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the recanalization rate and clinical outcome three months after endovascular treatment for vertebrobasilar occlusion before the placement of stentrievers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed all cases of basilar thrombosis treated with endovascular techniques at our center. We reviewed the clinical outcomes with the main objective of determining the recanalization rate and the secondary objective of evaluating the outcome using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) three months after treatment. We assessed clinical and angiographic variables and correlated them with outcome and complications. RESULTS: We reviewed a total of 27 consecutive patients (mean age, 58.1±15.5 y; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), 21, interquartile range, 18-29; median Glasgow coma score (GCS) 7, interquartile range, 4-9.5). The mean time between the onset of symptoms and endovascular treatment was 26.3±41.7hours. Complete or partial recanalization was achieved in 23 (85.1%) patients. Three months after treatment, 16 (59.2%) had died and 6 (22.2%) had good outcome (mRS ≤ 2). CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment achieved a high rate of recanalization of occlusions of the basilar artery. Nevertheless, a high percentage of the patients did not have a good outcome. New materials might improve the prognosis in these patients.