Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 30(59): 124053-124066, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37996576

RESUMO

The present study is an attempt to assess the radiogenic quality of groundwater on the basis of gross α, gross ß and tritium (3H or H-3) activities in the Bakreswar-Tantloi geothermal region of Chotanagpur Plateau, West Bengal and Jharkhand, India. The aforesaid parameters in groundwater samples were measured using liquid scintillation counting triple to double coincidence ratio (LSC-TDCR) technique. Groundwater samples collected from Bakreswar-Tantloi geothermal region show gross α activities from below the minimum detectable activity (BMDA) to 0.5 ± 0.05 Bq/L, gross ß activities from BMDA to 0.2 ± 0.01 Bq/L and H-3 activities from BMDA to 63.42 Bq/L. The average gross α, gross ß and H-3 activities are also within the permissible limits prescribed by the World Health Organization (WHO). Though the annual effective doses in some samples were higher than the reference dose level of 0.1 mSv, the overall result suggests that the groundwater in the Bakreswar-Tantloi geothermal region is radiologically safe considering the radionuclides covered in this study.


Assuntos
Água Subterrânea , Monitoramento de Radiação , Poluentes Radioativos da Água , Trítio , Poluentes Radioativos da Água/análise , Monitoramento de Radiação/métodos
2.
Environ Res ; 185: 109407, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32208205

RESUMO

The present study attempts to generate the first baseline data on gross α and ß activities in groundwater and riverine water samples collected from different regions of Indian Sundarbans, a part of the world's largest mangrove ecosystem. Until the present, no information is available related to radioactivity measurement in water samples from this vast area. Gross alpha-beta activities were measured by liquid scintillation counting-triple to double coincidence ratio (LSC-TDCR) technique. The minimum detectable activities in present experimental condition were found to be 21 mBq L-1 and 55 mBq L-1 for gross α and ß respectively. Gross alpha activities in all groundwater and riverine samples were found to be below the detection limit (BDL), whereas gross beta activities in groundwater and riverine samples varied from BDL to 0.46 ± 0.24 Bq L-1 and BDL to 0.90 ± 0.26 Bq L-1 respectively, which are below WHO recommended value 1 Bq L-1. Annual effective doses were below 0.1 mSv. U and Th concentrations in the water samples were determined by ultrasonic-nebulizer assisted Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and found to be BDL. For assessing 3H activity, double-distilled water samples were measured by LSC-TDCR technique, which provided BDL result.


Assuntos
Água Subterrânea , Monitoramento de Radiação , Radioatividade , Poluentes Radioativos da Água , Ecossistema , Humanos , Poluentes Radioativos da Água/análise
3.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 87: 410-3, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24485948

RESUMO

The work accomplished within the participation at the 2012 key comparison of Tc-99 is presented. The solution was standardized for the first time in IFIN-HH by two methods: LSC-TDCR and 4π(PC)ß-γ efficiency tracer. The methods are described and the results are compared. For the LSC-TDCR method, the program TDCR07c, written and provided by P. Cassette, was used for processing the measurement data. The results are 2.1% higher than when applying the TDCR06b program; the higher value, calculated with the software TDCR07c, was used for reporting the final result in the comparison. The tracer used for the 4π(PC)ß-γ efficiency tracer method was a standard (60)Co solution. The sources were prepared from the mixture (60)Co+(99)Tc solution and a general extrapolation curve, type: N(ßTc-99)/(M)(Tc-99)=f [1-ε(Co-60)], was drawn. This value was not used for the final result of the comparison. The difference between the values of activity concentration obtained by the two methods was within the limit of the combined standard uncertainty of the difference of these two results.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA