Assessing neophyte response to daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses: A randomised clinical trial investigation over one month.

OBJECTIVE: This randomised clinical trial assessed the impact on symptoms, tear film dynamics and ocular surface integrity of daily disposable silicone-hydrogel contact lenses (CLs) over a month, paying special attention to lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) and its implications for CL discomfort. METHODS: Neophyte CL wearers (n = 44, 21.09 ± 5.00 years old) were randomly assigned to either the experimental (n = 24) or control group (n = 20). Participants assigned to the experimental group were required to wear daily disposable CLs for 1 month for at least 8 h/day and 6 days/week. All participants were healthy subjects (no history of ocular surgery or active ocular disease) with spherical refractive errors between -8.00 and +5.00 D and cylindrical power <0.75 D. At the baseline and 1-month sessions, the Dry Eye Questionnaire 5 (DEQ-5) was completed, together with the measurement of tear film osmolarity with the TearLab osmometer, tear meniscus height (TMH) and lipid layer pattern (LLP) using a slit-lamp with Tearscope Plus attached, fluorescein break-up time (FBUT), maximum blink interval (MBI), corneal staining with fluorescein under cobalt blue light and LWE with lissamine green under slit lamp and halogen white light. RESULTS: At the baseline session, LWE showed a negative correlation with DEQ-5 (r = -0.37, p = 0.02). Significant differences in FBUT and LWE (p = 0.04) and a positive correlation between LWE and DEQ-5 (r = 0.49, p = 0.007) were observed at 1 month. Intrasession analysis at 1 month showed significant differences between the experimental and control groups in DEQ-5, FBUT and LWE (all p ≤ 0.02). Intersession analysis in the experimental group showed variations in DEQ-5, FBUT and LWE (all p ≤ 0.02) but no significant variation in the control group (all p ≥ 0.11). CONCLUSION: The presence of LWE was significantly correlated with higher symptom values in the DEQ-5. Also, participants in the experimental group presented higher values of LWE after 1 month of CL wear, in comparison with the control group.

A Hue-Value method for semi-automated assessment of Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy.

BACKGROUND: Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) is a marker of an abnormal lid/cornea interaction. This study proposes an automated Hue-Value grading algorithm of LWE staining following manual selection of the region of interest. METHODS: Images of LWE staining were processed using Hue and Value from HSV (Hue-Saturation-Value) color space with a custom MATLAB program. Thirty-one images were successfully analyzed. Examiners analyzed images in random order twice, separated by more than a week. Bland Altman and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were performed. RESULTS: There was no difference (p > 0.05) between upper (UL) and lower (LL) eyelids for LWE height (UL: 0.12 ± 0.12 mm, LL: 0.12 ± 0.07 mm), width (UL: 10.70 ± 3.84 mm, LL: 10.26 ± 3.49 mm), or area (UL: 2.85 ± 2.67 mm2, LL: 2.63 ± 1.71 mm2). There was no between examiner difference for all eyelid LWE height or area (p > 0.05), but a difference in LWE width (0.16 mm; p = 0.031). ICC for LWE height, width and area were 0.996 (95% CI: 0.993 to 0.998), 0.997 (95% CI: 0.992 to 0.998) and 0.999 (95% CI: 0.998 to 0.999). There was no between examiner difference for height or area (p > 0.05) for UL, but a difference in LWE width (0.28 mm; p = 0.026). ICC for height, width and area were 0.999 (95% CI: 0.996 to 1.00), 0.995 (95% CI: 0.982 to 0.999) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.999 to 1.00). There was no difference in LWE height, width or area for LL (all p > 0.05). ICC were 0.991 (95% CI: 0.973 to 0.997) for height, 0.998 (95% CI: 0.995 to 0.999) for width and 0.997 (95% CI: 0.990 to 0.999) for area. CONCLUSIONS: This novel method results in highly repeatable interexaminer measures of LWE staining after general lid region delineation. Small differences in LWE width were observed between examiners.

Lid wiper epitheliopathy in symptomatic and asymptomatic dry eye subjects.

PURPOSE: Lid wiper epithliopathy (LWE) was stuided in symptomatic and asymptomatic dry eye subjects. This is the first such study to be conducted in the Indian population. LWE is a clinical condition associated with vital staining in the lower and upper eyelids on increased friction of the lid margin over to the cornea. Our aim was to study LWE in symptomatic and asymptomatic (control) dry eye subjects. METHODS: Out of 96 subjects screened, 60 subjects were enrolled in the study and were divided into two groups, symptomatic and asymptomatic dry eye subjects, based on the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores. The subjects were examined to rule out clinical dry eye findings and assessed for LWE with two different dyes (fluorescein and lissamine green). Descriptive analysis was done and Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 60 subjects were enrolled in a study with a mean age of 21.33 ± 1.88 years, out of which the majority of LWE patients (99.8%) was seen in the symptomatic group than the asymptomatic group (73.3%); the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.00) and also clinically significant. LWE was found to be significantly higher in symptomatic dry eye subjects (99.8%) compared to asymptomatic dry eye subjects (73.3%). LWE severity was also found to be more (56.6% of grade 3) among symptomatic dry eye subjects compared to asymptomatic subjects (40% of grade 2). CONCLUSION: It is important to assess the lid wiper region (LWR) and treat LWE in routine clinical practice.

Development and validation of a new photographic scale to grade lid wiper epitheliopathy.

PURPOSE: Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) is a clinical sign that has been associated with dry eye disease (DED) and contact lens discomfort (CLD). This study describes the development, validation and graders' preference of a new photographic scale for LWE, the Photographic Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy (PLWE) scale. METHODS: The PLWE grading scale was developed using LWE images selected from 57 screened patients (≥18 years of age) with confirmed LWE in both eyes. To validate the PLWE scale, a set including 20 images showing varying degrees of LWE from none to severe was chosen. To assess grading validity and grading reliability, observers were asked to grade the selected images using the PLWE and another commonly used subjective LWE grading protocol (Korb) on two separate sessions. RESULTS: The mean grade (±SD) of all images was not statistically significant different between the PLWE scale (1.55 ± 0.44) and the alternative grading scale (Korb, 1.47 ± 0.54) (ANOVA F1, p > 0.05). The average difference from the mean of all graders was 0.03 ± 0.53 using the PLWE scale and 0.06 ± 0.57 when using the Korb protocol (ANOVA F1, p > 0.05). The Coefficient of Repeatability was 1.04 and 1.12 for the PLWE and Korb scales (p > 0.05). Ninety-five percent of the graders found PLWE easier to use than Korb and the same percentage would consider using the PLWE scale in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The format of the PLWE is similar to other anterior segment visual grading scales and this study revealed an ease of use preference for employing the PLWE by the graders. The presence of LWE has been associated with DED and CLD, and the addition of this new photographic scale could facilitate clinical judgement and record keeping of LWE in clinical practice.

Research progress on the relationship between lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry eye / 国际眼科杂志(Guoji Yanke Zazhi)

Lid-wiper epitheliopathy(LWE)refers to the corresponding pathological changes in the palpebral conjunctiva after the skin-mucosa junction area of the palpebral margin, and staining occurs after using dyes such as fluorescein sodium or lissamine green. Current studies suggest that LWE mainly results from the increase of friction between the lid wiper and the ocular surface. The specific mechanism of LWE is not clear, but the common causes include wearing contact lenses, abnormal tear film, blink abnormalities and inflammation. Clinical studies have found that LWE appears when the conventional dry eye index is negative, so the diagnosis of LWE plays an important role in the early diagnosis and treatment of dry eye. However, there are few studies on the correlation between LWE and dry eye in clinical practice. Based on the existing clinical studies, the etiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and treatment of LWE are introduced, and the research progress of LWE and dry eye is reviewed, hoping to provide reference for further investigation and the clinical application of LWE.

Epiteliopatía en limpiaparabrisas en pacientes con blefaroespasmo o espasmo hemifacial / Lid wiper epitheliopathy in patients with blepharospasm and/or hemifacial spasm

Objetivo Evaluar la presencia de epiteliopatía en limpiaparabrisas en pacientes con blefaroespasmo o espasmo hemifacial antes del tratamiento habitual con toxina botulínica y 4 semanas después. Métodos Estudio prospectivo compuesto por 31 ojos de 20 pacientes con diagnóstico neurológico de espasmo hemifacial (9 ojos de 9 pacientes) y blefaroespasmo esencial (22 ojos de 11 pacientes). Se evaluaron antes y 4 semanas después de la infiltración con toxina botulínica diversos parámetros de superficie ocular con el cuestionario OSDI, test de Schirmer, tiempo de rotura lagrimal y tinciones de fluoresceína y verde de lisamina valoradas con el test de Oxford y el grado de afectación del limpiaparabrisas palpebral. Resultados El 100% de los pacientes presentaron afectación del limpiaparabrisas palpebral antes (30% grado leve y 70% moderado) y después del tratamiento con toxina (100% grado leve). El 75% de los pacientes presentaron un OSDI normal-leve antes del tratamiento; después del tratamiento fue del 80%. El tiempo de rotura lagrimal fue de 7,2±0,2 s antes y de 7,5±0,7 s después del tratamiento. El test de Schirmer fue de 11,4±5,5 y 12,5±5,5mm antes y después del tratamiento. El test de Oxford resultó patológico inicialmente en el 69,3% de los pacientes; tras 4 semanas solo fue patológico en el 54%. Conclusión La epiteliopatía en limpiaparabrisas está presente en el 100% de los pacientes con blefaroespasmo o espasmo hemifacial. El principal mecanismo fisiopatológico que la desencadena en estos pacientes es el aumento en el coeficiente de fricción, ya que el volumen y la estabilidad lagrimal son normales (AU)

Objective To evaluate the presence of wiper epitheliopathy in patients with blepharospasm and/or hemifacial spasm before and 4 weeks after routine treatment with botulinum toxin. Methods Prospective study comprising 31 eyes of 20 patients with neurological diagnosis of hemifacial spasm (9 eyes of 9 patients) and essential blepharospasm (22 eyes of 11 patients). Various ocular surface parameters were assessed before and 4 weeks after infiltration with botulinum toxin using the OSDI questionnaire, Schirmer's test, tear break-up time, fluorescein and lissamine green staining assessed with the Oxford test and the degree of involvement of the palpebral wiper. Results 100% of the patients had palpebral wiper involvement before (30% mild and 70% moderate) and after toxin treatment (100% mild). 75% of patients had mild-normal OSDI before treatment, after treatment it was 80%. The tear break-up time was 7.2±0.2 sg before and 7.5±0.7 sg after treatment. Schirmer's test was 11.4±5.5 and 12.5±5.5mm before and after treatment. The Oxford test was initially pathological in 69.3% of patients, after 4 weeks it was pathological in only 54%. Conclusion Wiper epitheliopathy is present in 100% of patients with blepharospasm and/or hemifacial spasm. The main pathophysiological mechanism that triggers it in these patients is the increase in the coefficient of friction, as tear volume and stability are norma (AU)

Cytokeratin profile and keratinocyte gene expression in keratinized lid margins of patients with chronic Stevens-Johnson syndrome.

PURPOSE: To study the cytokeratin profile and keratinization-related gene expression in keratinized lid margins of chronic Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) patients. METHODS: Posterior eyelid margins from 24 chronic SJS patients undergoing mucous membrane grafting and six healthy margins (orbital exenteration, fresh body donors) were studied using immunofluorescence staining (CK10, CK1, filaggrin, transglutaminase 1 (TGM1), (CK19, MUC5AC)) and quantitative PCR (keratinization-related genes-HBEGF, KGF, EGF, TGFα, TGFß, and TNFα). The staining and gene expression were studied separately in the lid margin epidermis (LME) and lid margin conjunctiva (LMC). RESULTS: The expression of CK 1/10, filaggrin, and TGM1 in the LMC was similar to the LME in SJS patients. CK19 was expressed only in the basal epithelial layer of the LMC with loss of MUC5AC expression. Increased expression of KGF (p ≤ 0.056), TNFα (p ≤ 0.02), and TGFα (p ≤ 0.01) was observed in the LME of SJS patients compared to normal LME. LMC of SJS patients showed an increased expression of HBEGF (p ≤ 0.002), EGF (p ≤ 0.0002), KGF (p ≤ 0.02), TNFα (p ≤ 0.04), TGFα (p ≤ 0.003), and TGFß (p ≤ 0.001) compared to normal LMC. Significant differences were observed in the expression of these genes between LME and LMC of SJS patients. These genes were validated using String analysis, which revealed the positive regulation of keratinization. CONCLUSION: In lid margins of SJS, there is an increased expression of keratinization-related genes compared to the normal lid margin. Keratinized LMC shares similar cytokeratin profile and keratinization gene expression as seen in cutaneous epithelium of SJS patients, indicating the possibility of the cutaneous epithelium as a source for keratinized LMC.

Tribology and the Ocular Surface.

Introduction: Tribology is known as the science of friction, lubrication and the determination of what occurs when two surfaces slide against one another. The required partners in this science are a minimum of two surfaces and relative motion. Tribology could be a key factor in dissecting the issues that surround and confound dry eye in patients as well as contact lens discomfort and intolerance. Specifically, it is this issue that is a potential causative underlying factor that could lead to conditions like lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE). Methods: Peer-reviewed literature was reviewed as It pertains to ocular tribology and the application to the ocular anatomy. A PubMed review was performed using the keywords: tribology, friction, lid wiper epitheliopathy, contact lens, and dry eye. All manuscripts were reviewed for mentions of tribology and friction. The exact same process was performed with The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) abstracts. Results: In relation to the ocular surface, tribology describes the mechanical interactions between the upper and lower lid wipers and the globe. The Stribeck curve can be applied, as the sliding partners are separated by a complex, lubricating tear film. The surface brush anatomy at the eye to eyelid juncture reduces friction and alters the Stribeck curve in favor of the hydrodynamic regime, allowing for high velocity movement with minimal wear. Changes to the tear film or the introduction of a contact lens can displace the Stribeck curve, increase friction, and induce wear thus leading to patient symptomology. Conclusion: Further studies may provide new insight into contact lens discomfort and ocular surface disease, including LWE; however, adaptation of tribology work performed in vitro to in vivo patient care is challenging.

Lid wiper epitheliopathy in patients with blepharospasm and/or hemifacial spasm.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence of wiper epitheliopathy in patients with blepharospasm and/or hemifacial spasm before and 4 weeks after routine treatment with botulinum toxin. METHODS: Prospective study comprising 31 eyes of 20 patients with neurological diagnosis of hemifacial spasm (9 eyes of 9 patients) and essential blepharospasm (22 eyes of 11 patients). Various ocular surface parameters were assessed before and 4 weeks after infiltration with botulinum toxin using the OSDI questionnaire, Schirmer's test, tear break-up time (BUT), fluorescein and lissamine green staining assessed with the Oxford test and the degree of involvement of the palpebral wiper. RESULTS: 100% of the patients had palpebral wiper involvement before (30% mild and 70% moderate) and after toxin treatment (100% mild). 75% of patients had mild-normal OSDI before treatment, after treatment it was 80%. The BUT was 7.2 ±â€¯0.2 sg before and 7.5 ±â€¯0.7 sg after treatment. Schirmer's test was 11.4 ±â€¯5.5 and 12.5 ±â€¯5.5 mm before and after treatment. The Oxford test was initially pathological in 69.3% of patients, after 4 weeks it was pathological in only 54%. CONCLUSION: Wiper epitheliopathy is present in 100% of patients with blepharospasm and/or hemifacial spasm. The main pathophysiological mechanism that triggers it in these patients is the increase in the coefficient of friction, as tear volume and stability are normal.

Natural course of lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) in symptomatic contact lens wearers.

PURPOSE: To establish the time course of lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) in established CL wearers after a single day (6-10 h) of daily disposable contact lens (CL) wear, the following day post-CL removal and 1-week after CL discontinuation. METHODS: Twenty-one symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 12) habitual wearers of MyDay® silicone hydrogel daily disposable were included. LWE staining was assessed prior to CL wear (Visit 1, V1) using semi-automated analysis after instillation of two drops of 1 % lissamine green (10 µL) that were applied to the superior bulbar conjunctiva. LWE measurements were repeated after 6-10 h of continuous CL wear (Visit 2, V2), post-CL removal the following day (Visit 3, V3) and after 1-week CL discontinuation (Visit 4, V4). At each visit, ocular symptoms were evaluated using the SPEED-8 questionnaire and set of 0-100 visual analogue scales (VAS). RESULTS: LWE showed no significant changes after 6-10 h of continuous CL wear (p = 0.536), post-CL removal the following day (p = 0.677) or following 1-week of CL discontinuation (p = 0.478). Analysis revealed a significant improvement in symptomatology between V1 and V2 (SPEED-8, p < 0.01) and also improvements in the 0-100 VAS scores between V2 and V4 for average daily dryness (p < 0.01), end-of-day dryness (p < 0.01) and frequency of end-of-day dryness (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that the etiology of LWE is multifactorial and the sole intervention of temporarily discontinuing CL wear does not lead to resolution of these clinical signs.

Cytomorphological assessment of the lid margin in relation to symptoms, contact lens wear and lid wiper epitheliopathy.

PURPOSE: Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) is insufficiently understood from a cytological perspective. This study explored the relationship between lid margin cytomorphology, LWE, contact lens wear, and lens-related symptoms. METHODS: Habitual, symptomatic (n = 20) and asymptomatic (n = 20) soft, rigid gas permeable (n = 18) and non-contact lens wearers (n = 19) were enrolled. LWE was graded using lissamine green and the Korb scale. Subjective symptoms were assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index and the Contact Lens Dryness Evaluation Questionnaire. Impression cytology samples obtained from the central upper and lower lid margins of both eyes stained histologically to highlight keratinization and imaged using high-resolution microscopy. A masked investigator digitally delimited and measured the average sagittal width of the lid wiper conjunctiva and mucocutaneous junction using ImageJ. RESULTS: The upper lid wiper conjunctiva measured 424 ± 171 µm, 404 ± 75, 667 ± 219 and 266 ± 64 in asymptomatic soft, symptomatic soft, rigid and non-contact lens wearers, respectively. The corresponding lower lid wiper conjunctivae measured 141 ± 57 µm, 232 ± 150, 519 ± 212 and 225 ± 102, which was significantly narrower than that of the upper eyelid in most cases (p < 0.05). Symptoms were not associated with lid margin changes; however, rigid lens wear and clinical LWE were associated with histologically enlarged lid wiper conjunctival areas and increased keratinization. CONCLUSION: A novel, exploratory account of histological measures of LWE and cytomorphological change associated with contact lens wear suggests mechanical or frictional cellular insult is occurring at the lid wiper conjunctiva.

Lid wiper epitheliopathy: The influence of multiple lid eversions and exposure time.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of multiple lid eversions on lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE), along with the effect of cumulative lid exposure time and the patterns of associated staining. METHODS: The increase in area of lid wiper staining with lissamine green was compared by everting both the upper eyelids of each subject (i.e. contralateral design), with one eye being everted once for 45 s and the fellow eyelid everted three times, each time for 15 s. This pattern of contralateral eversion was repeated with a total of three eversions in one eye and nine eversions in the fellow eye, with each eye totalling 135 s cumulative exposure to eversion over about 9 min. The LWE area of staining was objectively quantified from slit lamp photography images captured at every lid eversion by 2 masked observers. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to determine the effect of number of lid eversions and cumulative exposure time on the amount of staining caused. Each image was also categorized into its primary LWE staining pattern, by a masked observer. RESULTS: The multiple eversions condition caused significantly greater LWE than the single eversion condition (p < 0.001), while cumulative exposure time did not have a significant effect on LWE (p = 0.137). Classification of the primary staining patterns revealed that with more eyelid eversions there was a shift from mostly 'no staining' to minor patterns ('short horizontal bands' and 'vertical streaks') and then to more extensive patterns ('broad horizontal bands' and 'comb-shaped'). CONCLUSIONS: The number of eyelid eversions is a confounding factor that should be controlled when investigating LWE, in particular when considering the link with dry eye or contact lens discomfort. However the cumulative exposure time did not appear to influence the LWE magnitude.

Impact of soft contact lenses on lid- parallel conjunctival folds.

PURPOSE: Lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF) are related to dry eye symptoms and appear to be related to mechanical forces in blinks. The primary aim of this longitudinal, parallel group study was to investigate impact of contact lens wear (CLW) on LIPCOF and secondly the impact of contact lens wear on lid-wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) and dry eye symptoms. METHODS: After a 2-week wash-out phase with a hydrogen peroxide care regimen, 30 experienced contact lens wearers (female: 25, male: 5; median age: 34.5 years) with at least LIPCOF Sum grade 1 (nasal + temporal LIPCOF, either eye) were randomised into three groups: one which discontinued CLW (SPEC), one which were refitted with senofilcon A two-weekly replacement daily wear silicone hydrogel (OAS) and one which continued to wear their habitual lenses (HCL). LIPCOF Sum and LWE were evaluated at the enrolment visit and over a period of 12 weeks. LIPCOF were classified by fold number using a four-grade scale. LWE was classified using a five-point scale after staining with lissamine green and fluorescein. Symptoms were evaluated with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). RESULTS: On enrolment, there were no differences between groups for LIPCOF Sum (median 2.0), LWE (1.0) and OSDI scores (12.5) (Kruskal-Wallis, p > 0.718). Median changes at 12-weeks follow-up compared to the enrolment visit were (HCL-group: 0.5, 0.0, 0.0; OAS-group: -1.0, -0.5, -10.42; SPEC-group: -0.5, -0.5, -5.21; LIPCOF, LWE and OSDI, respectively). LIPCOF (Friedman-Test, p = 0.178), LWE (p = 0.791) and OSDI (p = 0.874) were unaltered over the period of observation in the HCL group. LWE (p = 0.120) was unaltered in OAS group but LIPCOF (p = 0.001) and OSDI (p = 0.003) significantly improved. In the SPEC group LIPCOF (p = 0.031), LWE (p = 0.002) and OSDI (ANOVA repeated measurements, p = 0.034) changed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Refitting experienced CLW with senofilcon A daily wear, 2-week reusable contact lenses, or ceasing lens wear, improved LIPCOF, LWE and dryness symptoms.

Comparison of subjective grading of lid wiper epitheliopathy with a semi-objective method.

PURPOSE: To validate a semi-objective method of grading lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) compared to subjective assessment. METHODS: Twenty upper and 20 lower eyelid margins of patients with LWE were photographed after instillation of fluorescein and lissamine green. The images were graded by two observers using a 0-3 grading scale for height (%) and width (mm) of the lid staining. The images were also processed using custom designed software in MATLAB. After manual delineation of the staining area, width and perpendicular height were automatically measured throughout the selected area. The height as a proportion of the lid margin width and width measures were then categorized into the same bins as in the grading scale. RESULTS: Repeatability of the image analysis system showed a mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between repeats of -0.01mm (0.03 and -0.05mm) for LWE height, 0.04mm (1.16 and -1.08mm) for LWE width, and -0.11mm2 (0.32 and -0.53mm2) for LWE area. The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between image analysis and human grading for LWE height was -0.84 grades (0.54 and -2.21 grades), for LWE width was 0.31 grades (1.22 and -0.59 grades), and for the final grade (mean height and width) was -0.26 (0.44 and -0.96 grades) (all p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Human observers tend to overestimate the height and underestimate the width of LWE staining. Lid wiper region is not well defined, thus, it might be a difficult process for human observers to judge the stained region as a proportion of the lid wiper total region.

Comparative performance of lissamine green stains.

PURPOSE: To investigate the performance of lissamine green strips from different manufacturers. Additionally, the repeatability, need for sequential dye instillation and impact of repeated lid evertion on lid wiper staining were assessed. METHODS: Study 1 was a prospective, randomised cross-over study where controlled volumes of lissamine green solution prepared from strips (Biotech, Lissaver, GreenGlo, OPGreen) were instilled (right eye: single; left eye: double instillation) on five different days, with OPGreen being tested twice. Lids were everted and digital photographs taken, which were later assessed by a masked observer. Study 2 was an investigator-masked, randomised, controlled study testing the impact of single versus repeated lid evertion. Lid wiper staining was graded (0 to 3 in 0.5 steps). RESULTS: Lid wiper staining differed significantly between lissamine green solutions, with GreenGlo showing the highest amount of staining, and Lissaver the least (all p>0.009). There were no differences in lid wiper staining over two days, using the OPGreen solution (all p>0.05). The number of drops instilled (single versus double) did not significantly affect lid wiper staining (all p>0.05). Repeated lid evertion increased lid wiper staining (p=0.007 when combined with double drop instillation). Light absorbance patterns and measured concentrations aligned with clinical findings. CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in performance between lissamine green solutions. Lid wiper staining was impacted by repeated lid evertion but sequential instillation and use of the Korb grading scale provided little advantage over simpler methods Clinicians must consider this when investigating lid wipers, especially when interpreting a negative finding.

Contact lens wear and dry eyes: challenges and solutions.

The number of contact lens wearers worldwide has remained relatively stable over the past decade, despite the investment that has gone into contact lens technology. This is largely because 10%-50% of wearers dropout of contact lens wear within 3 years of commencement; the most common reason cited being contact lens discomfort (CLD). Of the symptoms reported, sensation of dry eye is the most common. Given the outcome of reduced wearing time, increased chair time, and ultimate contact lens discontinuation, the challenge is to identify the warning signs of CLD early on. Clinically detectable changes such as conjunctival staining, conjunctival indentation, conjunctival epithelial flap formation, lid wiper epitheliopathy, Demodex blepharitis, and meibomian gland dysfunction have been linked to CLD, highlighting the need to perform regular aftercare visits to identify these changes. At a cellular level, conjunctival metaplasia and reduced goblet cell density have been linked to CLD, leading to a downstream effect on the tear film breakup time of contact lens wearers. These factors suggest a strong link between CLD and friction, raising the need to target this as a means of minimizing CLD. The purpose of this review is to identify the clinical signs that relate to CLD as a means of earlier detection and management in order to combat contact lens dropout.

Lid wiper epitheliopathy.

Some recent research has resulted in a hypothesis that there is a common 'lid wiper' region that is apposite to the ocular surface or anterior lens surface (where contact lenses are worn), responsible for spreading tears during blinking. In the upper eyelid, it extends about 0.6 mm from the crest of the sharp posterior (inner) lid border (i.e. the mucocutaneous junction, or line of Marx) to the subtarsal fold superiorly and from the medial upper punctum to the lateral canthus horizontally. Histologically, it is seen as an epithelial elevation comprising of stratified epithelium with a transitional conjunctival structure of (moving posteriorly) squamous cells then cuboidal cells, with some parakeratinised cells and goblet cells. Lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) denotes staining of the lid wiper observed after instillation of dyes such as fluorescein, rose bengal or lissamine green. There have been some reports of higher rates of LWE in dry eye patients and contact lens wearers, but others have failed to find such associations. The primary cause of LWE is thought to be increased friction between the lid wiper and ocular or anterior contact lens surface due to inadequate lubrication, which could be caused by dry eye and may be exacerbated by factors such as abnormal blinking patterns, poor contact lens surface lubricity and adverse environmental influences. Recent evidence suggests that LWE is associated with sub-clinical inflammation. LWE has the potential to provide the missing mechanistic link between clinical observation and symptoms associated with dry eye and contact lens wear. Clinical and fundamental research into LWE is still in its infancy and in many instances equivocal; however, it is an idea that provides a potentially important new avenue for further investigation of anterior eye discomfort associated with ocular dryness and contact lens wear.

Involvement of Eyelid Pressure in Lid-Wiper Epitheliopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether eyelid pressure is involved in the development of lid-wiper epitheliopathy (LWE). METHODS: Study 1: The eyelid pressure was measured with a blepharo-tensiometer, and the degree of LWE was assessed in 79 eyes of 43 non-contact lens (CL) wearers. Study 2: The movements of the eyelids and displacement of the eyes during spontaneous blinking were photographed with a high-speed camera. The eyelid pressure was also measured in 34 normal eyes of 19 non-CL wearers who were not part of Study 1. RESULTS: Study 1: Upper-LWE was detected in 24 of 79 eyes (30.4%), and no significant difference was detected in the eyelid pressure between any grade of upper-LWE. Lower-LWE was detected in 41 of 79 eyes (51.9%), and the eyelid pressure (27.9 ± 2.8 mmHg) in eyes with grade 3 LWE was significantly higher than that with grade 0 LWE (19.7 ± 1.3 mmHg; p < 0.05). Study 2: The lower eyelid pressure was significantly correlated with the length of the horizontal movement of the lower eyelids (p < 0.05) and also with the degree of posterior movement of the eye globe (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The higher pressure from the eyelid may be one of the causes for the development of lower-LWE.

Tear and ocular surface profile in adult anophthalmic sockets

Objective@#To determine the tear and ocular surface profile of the anophthalmic socket in relation to the contralateral normal eye.@*Methods@#Twenty-five adult patients with unilateral anophthalmic sockets were included into the study. They were at least 2 months post-enucleation or post-evisceration and without any topical medications on the anophthalmic socket and control eye for at least 2 weeks. Assessment was performed using the following parameters: (1) meibomian gland evaluation, (2) ocular surface staining, (3) degree of conjunctival inflammation, (4) Schirmer I and II, and (5) conjunctival impression cytology. @*Results@#Mucoid discharge (52%) was the most common complaint in anophthalmic sockets, followed by itchiness (40%), tearing (36%), and dryness (4%). Compared to control eyes, the anophthalmic sockets had more pronounced and statistically significant lid wiper epitheliopathy, conjunctival staining, and bulbar inflammation. Meibomian gland dysfunction, Schirmer I and II, and conjunctival impression cytology showed no difference between the 2 groups. There was a correlation between the symptoms complained and the ocular staining patterns of the anophthalmic sockets.@*Conclusion@#Anophthalmia predisposes to various ocular surface problems, such as a change in the composition of tears, specifically an increase in the mucin component and a decrease in the aqueous and lipid components, resulting to increased tear viscosity.

Clinical study of the treatment of lid-wiper epitheliopathy / 眼科研究

Objective Current research proposed that lid-wiper epitheliopathy may be a early symptom of dry eye.At present,there are seldom studies on lid-wiper epitheliopathy in both home and abroad.This study was to investigate the effect of artificial tears without antiseptic in the treatment of lid-wiper epitheliopathy and discuss the method of treatment of lid-wiper epitheliopathy. MethodsThis is a case-observative study.Seventy patients with lid-wiper epitheliopathy and with negative results in tear film break-up test,SchirmerⅠtest and corneal fluorescine staining were enrolled in the Peking University First Hospital during September 2006 and June 2008.The treatment group included 54 eyes of 54 patients who received topically free-antiseptic artificial tears (dextran 70 eye drops) four times per day for two weeks,and the control group included 16 eyes from 16 patients who were not treated.Dry Eye Questionnaire were taken from the patients before the administration of drug and 2 weeks after treatment.Fluorescein and Lissamine green double-staining was used before and after treatment for the evaluation of lid-wiper epitheliopathy.The disease was graded into 0 (absence) to 3(severe),and the symptoms and dye were scored following the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (Korb criteria).Informed consent and good compliance were obtained before initial and during the therapy duration. ResultsIn the treatment group,the scores of symproms and staining were significantly different between before and after administration of drug (12.91±2.55 vs 2.78±2.27 in symptom,t=22.70,P＜0.05;1.79±0.78 vs 0.19±0.31 in dye,Z=-6.40,P＜0.05),indicating the symptoms and dye results were obviously improved after therapy.In the control group,no significant differences were found in the symptom score and dye score in the corresponding time period (12.63±2.60 vs 12.94±2.11,t=-1.10,P＞0.05 in symptom;1.97±0.74 vs 1.98±0.72,Z=-0.58,P＞0.05 in dye).According to the grade of disease,the magnitude of the staining after treatment was considerably improved in comparison with before treatment (Z_1=-3.47 for mild,Z_2=-4.04 for moderate,Z_3=-3.74 for severe),showing statistically significant differences between them (P＜0.05).ConclusionThe use of artificial tears is an efficacious treatment for treating lid wiper epitheliopathy.The topicaly utilization of artificial tears can alleviate the symptoms and pathological changes of lid wiper epitheliopathy.