Trends and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with stimulant-related disorder diagnosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Stimulant-related disorders (SRD), or the continued misuse of illicit or prescribed stimulants, during pregnancy can have adverse health effects for mothers and infants. This study aimed to measure prevalence and trends of SRD diagnosis in pregnancy, and associations between SRD diagnosis and adverse maternal and infant health outcomes, among pregnant individuals in California. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: California, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant individuals from the Study of Outcomes in Mothers and Infants (SOMI) with singleton live births between 2012 and 2020 (n = 3 740 079). MEASUREMENTS: SRD diagnosis (excluding cocaine) and maternal (gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension [gHTN], severe maternal morbidity [SMM]) and infant (very preterm birth [gestational age <32 weeks], preterm birth [gestational age 32-37 weeks], neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] admission, small for gestational age [SGA]) outcomes were classified using International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes and vital statistics. Risk ratios were estimated with modified Poisson log linear regression that accounted for sibling pregnancies. Covariates included maternal sociodemographic characteristics, mental and physical health problems, nicotine use and co-occurrence of other diagnosed substance use disorders. Bias analyses were conducted to address unmeasured confounding and exposure misclassification. FINDINGS: SRD diagnosis among pregnant individuals increased from 2012 to 2020 (554 to 748 per 100 000 births). SRD diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of SMM (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2-2.5), gHTN (aRR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.7-1.9), very preterm birth (aRR = 2.2, 95% CI = 2.0-2.5), preterm birth (aRR = 2.1, 95% CI = 2.1-2.2) and NICU admission (aRR = 2.0, 95%CI = 1.9-2.0), and a decreased risk of gestational diabetes (aRR = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.8-0.9). SRD diagnosis was not associated with infants born SGA. Findings were generally robust to unmeasured confounding and misclassification of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulant-related disorder diagnosis during pregnancy appears to be associated with an increased risk for select adverse maternal and infant health outcomes including severe maternal morbidity, gestational hypertension, very preterm birth, preterm birth and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

Montelukast use in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes in asthma treatment.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the safety of montelukast in treating asthma during pregnancy, focusing on maternal and fetal outcomes such as congenital anomalies (CA), preterm delivery, low birthweight, spontaneous abortion, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preeclampsia. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Google Scholar, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception until April 30, 2024. The eligible studies assessed the safety of montelukast for asthma treatment during pregnancy. The review suggests that montelukast use during pregnancy may not significantly increase the risk of major CA. The pooled results yielded risk ratio (RR) for CA was 1.13 [95% CI (0.74, 1.73), p = 0.56, I2 = 0%]. Montelukast may be associated with preterm delivery and a low birthweight odds ratio (OR) of 1.82 [95% CI (1.35, 2.45), p < 0.001, I2 = 0%]. No significant risks were found concerning neurodevelopmental outcomes. The associations with spontaneous abortion were inconclusive [OR = 1.03, 95% CI (0.72, 1.5), p = 0.86, I2 = 73%], highlighting the need for further research. This comprehensive review underscores the importance of further investigating the safety profile of montelukast during pregnancy. While the overall findings indicate a relatively favorable safety profile, especially regarding major CA, careful consideration is needed for the potential risks of preterm delivery and low birthweight.

Factors associated with infection-related severe maternal outcomes in pregnant and recently pregnant women: A secondary analysis of the WHO global maternal sepsis study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to identify the risk factors for severe maternal outcomes (SMO) of women with suspected or confirmed infections using the data from the WHO global maternal sepsis study (GLOSS). METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the GLOSS cohort study, which involved pregnant or recently pregnant women with suspected or confirmed infection around 713 health facilities in 52 low- and middle-income countries, and high-income countries. A nested case-control study was conducted within the GLOSS cohort. Cases included infection-related maternal deaths or near misses, while controls represented non-SMO. Logistic mixed models, adjusting for country variations, were employed. Using univariate analysis, we calculated crude odds ratios (crude OR) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Variables were identified with less than 16% missing data, and P values less than 0.20 were used to perform the multivariate logistic model multilevel. RESULTS: A total of 2558 women were included in the analysis. As for the cases, 134 patients were found in the pregnant in labor or not in labor group and 246 patients in the postpartum or postabortion group. Pregnant women with prior childbirths faced a 64% increased risk of SMO. Ante- or intrapartum hemorrhage increased risk by 4.45 times, while trauma during pregnancy increased it by 4.81 times. Pre-existing medical conditions elevated risk five-fold, while hospital-acquired infections increased it by 53%. Secondary infections raised risk six-fold. Postpartum/postabortion women with prior childbirths had a 45% elevated risk, and pre-existing medical conditions raised it by 2.84 times. Hospital-acquired infections increased risk by 93%. Postpartum hemorrhage increased risk approximately five-fold, while abortion-related bleeding doubled it. Previous cesarean, abortion, and stillbirth also elevated risk. CONCLUSIONS: Key risk factors for SMO include prior childbirths, hemorrhage, trauma, pre-existing conditions, and hospital-acquired or secondary infections. Implementing effective alert systems and targeted interventions is essential to mitigate these risks and improve maternal health outcomes, especially in resource-limited settings.

Effect of group antenatal care versus individualized antenatal care on birth preparedness and complication readiness: a cluster randomized controlled study among pregnant women in Eastern Region of Ghana.

BACKGROUND: As utilization of individual antenatal care (I-ANC) has increased throughout sub-Saharan Africa, questions have arisen about whether individual versus group-based care might yield better outcomes. We implemented a trial of group-based antenatal care (G-ANC) to determine its impact on birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) among pregnant women in Ghana. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial comparing G-ANC to routine antenatal care in 14 health facilities in the Eastern Region of Ghana. We recruited women in their first trimester to participate in eight two-hour interactive group sessions throughout their pregnancies. Meetings were facilitated by midwives trained in G-ANC methods, and clinical assessments were conducted in addition to group discussions and activities. Data were collected at five timepoints, and results are presented comparing baseline (T0) to 34 weeks' gestation to 3 weeks post-delivery (T1) for danger sign recognition, an 11-point additive scale of BPCR, as well as individual items comprising the scale. RESULTS: 1285 participants completed T0 and T1 assessments (N = 668 I-ANC, N = 617, G-ANC). At T1, G-ANC participants were able to identify significantly more pregnancy danger signs than I-ANC participants (mean increase from 1.8 to 3.4 in G-ANC vs. 1.7 to 2.2 in I-ANC, p < 0.0001). Overall BPCR scores were significantly greater in the G-ANC group than the I-ANC group. The elements of BPCR that showed the greatest increases included arranging for emergency transport (I-ANC increased from 1.5 to 11.5% vs. G-ANC increasing from 2 to 41% (p < 0.0001)) and saving money for transportation (19-32% in the I-ANC group vs. 19-73% in the G-ANC group (p < 0.0001)). Identifying someone to accompany the woman to the facility rose from 1 to 3% in the I-ANC group vs. 2-20% in the G-ANC group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: G-ANC significantly increased BPCR among women in rural Eastern Region of Ghana when compared to routine antenatal care. Given the success of this intervention, future efforts that prioritize the implementation of G-ANC are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04033003 (25/07/2019). PROTOCOL AVAILABLE: Protocol Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9508671/ .

Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Adverse Maternal Obstetrical Events Among Teenage Mothers Delivering in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Southwestern Uganda.

INTRODUCTION: Many female teenagers in low-resource settings conceive, of which half are unplanned and end in many deaths in sub-Saharan Africa, accounting for the majority of the cases. Teenage pregnancy is associated sometimes with poor maternal, newborn, and child deaths. OBJECTIVES:  The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence, maternal obstetric outcomes, and factors associated with poor maternal obstetric outcomes among teenage mothers delivering at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital. METHODS:  This was a cross-sectional study carried out in a maternity ward at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, where 9,200 mothers deliver annually. All the women coming in for the delivery of their babies were consecutively approached for inclusion in the study. The women were enrolled in the post-delivery ward after delivery and interviewed with pretested questionnaires to capture the sociodemographic, obstetric, and medical profiles of the mothers. Factors were significant if the p-value was <0.05.  Results: Out of the 327 participants, the majority were rural dwellers (68.5%), married (75.8%), attained primary education (69.4%), had not used contraception (89%), and had had a planned pregnancy (63.3%). The prevalence of adverse maternal obstetrical events was 59.9%. The HIV-positive rate was 4.9%, and about half of the participants had delivered by cesarean section (41.6%). The participants' mean age was 18.4 years and SD 1.1. The mean number of antenatal care contacts attended was 4.59 and SD 1.9. The adverse maternal outcomes included episiotomy (30.9%), perineal tear (18.7%), premature rupture of membranes (10.1%), placenta abruption (5.2%), and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (4%). Having a cesarean delivery was found to significantly reduce the occurrence of adverse maternal obstetric events among the participants by 97% (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95% CI) of 0.03 (0.02-0.06), p-value<0.001). Having a prior history of a miscarriage was significantly associated with the occurrence of adverse maternal obstetrical events among the participants (aOR (95% CI) of 6.55 (1.46-29.42), p-value0.014). CONCLUSIONS:  Slightly more than half of the teenage mothers had adverse maternal obstetrical outcomes, and a history of a miscarriage in previous pregnancies was significantly associated with adverse maternal obstetrical outcomes. Having a cesarean delivery was found to significantly reduce the occurrence of adverse maternal obstetric events among the participants. Teenage mothers are at a high risk of adverse maternal obstetrical outcomes, and close antepartum and intrapartum surveillance is recommended.

Predictors of maternal and neonatal outcomes in labors complicated by shoulder dystocia: a comparative analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Studies investigating the risk factors associated with unfavorable maternal/neonatal outcomes in cases of shoulder dystocia are scarce. This study aims to uncover the predictive factors that give rise to unfavorable outcomes within the context of shoulder dystocia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of pregnancies complicated by shoulder dystocia was obtained between 2008-2022 from a single tertiary center. This study involved the comparison of sociodemographic, sonographic, and delivery characteristics among pregnancies complicated by shoulder dystocia resulting in favorable vs. unfavorable maternal/neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 275 pregnancies were analyzed, with 111 (40.3%) classified as unfavorable outcomes and 164 (59.7%) as favorable outcomes. Employing a multivariable regression analysis, several independent associations were identified with unfavorable maternal/neonatal outcomes. Specifically, short maternal stature, pre-gestational diabetes, vacuum extraction, Wood's screw maneuver, and macrosomia merged as significant predictors of unfavorable maternal/neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Short maternal stature, pre-gestational diabetes, vacuum extraction, Wood's screw maneuver, and macrosomia may all contribute to poor maternal/neonatal outcomes in shoulder dystocia cases. This knowledge allows clinicians to improve their decision-making, patient care, and counseling.

Maternal and Newborn Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 and Pregnancy: Parallels and Contrasts with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Purpose of Review: Our review aims to compare and contrast Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19's impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes. We have made significant progress in Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome prevention and treatment over the last few decades. Drawing on empirical evidence with past public health crises can offer valuable insights into dealing with current and future pandemics. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct a comparative analysis of the resemblances and disparities existing between Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19.This research endeavor represents a pioneering and all-encompassing examination, aiming to discern and comprehend the parallels and contrasts in the respective impacts of SARS-CoV-2 and Human Immunodeficiency Virus on pregnancy. Recent Findings: Based on the current evidence, there is no indication that pregnancy increases women's susceptibility to acquiring Human Immunodeficiency Virus or SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, the state of being pregnant was correlated with the worsening of diseases and their progression. Both Human Immunodeficiency Virus and SARS-CoV-2 pose increased risks of maternal mortality and several obstetric complications, including premature birth and pre-eclampsia. While the vertical transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus is well-established, a comprehensive understanding of the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 remains elusive, emphasizing the need for further investigations. Initial data suggest low SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission rates in the setting of proper preventative interventions and universal screening. A cesarean delivery could reduce the risk of mother-to-child transmission in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected women with high viral loads or poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, it did not offer additional protection for Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected women who adhered to Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy or those with COVID-19. Human Immunodeficiency Virus and SARS-CoV-2 were linked to neonatal complications such as stillbirth, low birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The universal testing of both pregnant patients and neonates is an effective strategy to prevent the spread and complications of both Human Immunodeficiency Virus and SARS-CoV-2. Human Immunodeficiency Virus control largely relies on preventing vertical transmission and medications during pregnancy and postpartum, whereas safety behaviors and vaccines have proven effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmissions. Summary: This review aims to compare and contrast the impact of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and SARS-CoV-2 on pregnancy outcomes, vertical transmissions, delivery modalities, neonatal outcomes, and clinical management. SARS-CoV-2 and Human Immunodeficiency Virus were associated with significant obstetric-related complications, making close clinical monitoring and preparation essential. Integration of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 management with reproductive health services is crucial to ensuring maternal and neonatal outcomes. Our review is not only the first to establish a groundwork for the current state of knowledge and its clinical implications on this topic, but it also sheds new insights for future research directions.Comparing Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and SARS-CoV-2 in terms of their impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes provides valuable insights despite their differences. Leveraging Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome research can help understand SARS-CoV-2 effects on pregnancy. Both infections pose risks to pregnant individuals and their fetuses, leading to increased maternal mortality and complications. Identifying common patterns and risk factors can improve clinical management for pregnant individuals with SARS-CoV-2. While a direct observational study for this comparison may not be feasible, comparing with Human Immunodeficiency Virus offers an ethical and practical approach. However, specific studies on SARS-CoV-2 are still necessary to gather detailed data on maternal and fetal outcomes.

Harmonizing Motherhood: Navigating Pregnancy Outcomes in Connective Tissue Disorders.

Background Connective tissue disorders encompass a diverse array of autoimmune and hereditary conditions, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. These disorders present unique challenges during pregnancy due to their complex pathophysiology and potential complications. Understanding their impact on pregnancy outcomes is vital for optimizing maternal and fetal health. Objective To investigate the burden, complications, maternal and fetal outcomes, and prognosis of connective tissue disorders in pregnancy. Methods The study was conducted over one year and six months at Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India, involving 45 pregnant women diagnosed with connective tissue disorders. Standard antenatal investigations were conducted, and participants were monitored throughout the antenatal period. Maternal and fetal outcomes were meticulously evaluated. Results Baseline characteristics revealed a heterogeneous distribution of age and parity among participants, reflecting the diverse nature of connective tissue disorders in pregnancy. Maternal medical outcomes, such as gestational hypertension (GHTN) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), were prevalent, highlighting the necessity of close monitoring. Obstetric outcomes included spontaneous abortion and preterm delivery, indicating elevated risks in this population. Fetal outcomes, including fetal growth restriction and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, underscored the impact of these disorders on fetal health. Conclusion This study examines pregnant connective tissue disorder burden, complications, maternal and fetal outcomes, and prognosis. The complicated relationship between these illnesses, and pregnancy requires specialist care and close monitoring. The participants' baseline features represent connective tissue condition heterogeneity, affecting clinical practice. Among the study subjects, 40% had RA and 20% had SLE, the most common connective tissue illness. Adverse maternal medical outcomes, like GHTN (27.27% of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients and 22.22% of SLE patients) and GDM (18.18% of APS patients and 11.11% of SLE patients), highlight the need for close maternal health monitoring and management during pregnancy. Overall, this study sheds light on connective tissue abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes. Healthcare providers can improve reproductive health and well-being for various illnesses by knowing these relationships.

A Retrospective Case Series Analysis of Pregnancy and COVID-19 Based on a Global Postmarketing COVID-19 Surveillance Program.

PURPOSE: To document and characterize COVID-19 cases involving pregnancy in the context of exposure to pharmaceutical products. METHODS: This retrospective case series analysis leveraged the Pfizer safety database containing worldwide adverse event data related to use of Pfizer products between October 1, 2019 and November 3, 2022. Selected Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (Version 25.0) Preferred Terms and subsequent clinical review were used to identify COVID-19 cases involving female patients who received Pfizer products during pregnancy and infants with intrauterine exposure to Pfizer products. FINDINGS: As of November 3, 2022, 504 pregnancy cases (426 maternal; 78 infants) were identified. Most maternal cases reported COVID-19 during the third trimester, and (when known) 52% of cases involved presentation or progression of severe COVID-19 with associated complications requiring hospitalization, and often intensive management (eg, mechanical ventilation, oxygen support) and emergent delivery. Twenty-three maternal cases were fatal; patients developed severe COVID-19 disease involving multisystem deterioration (eg, cardiopulmonary injury/decompensation, coagulopathies, septic/hemorrhagic shock) and frequently required risk-benefit decisions regarding maintaining/prolonging pregnancies to improve fetal viability while attempting to improve or stabilize maternal conditions or electing to either terminate pregnancies or induce emergent deliveries. Approximately 40% of maternal cases reported medical history involving at least one underlying condition (eg, diabetes, respiratory disorders, renal/hepatic disease, cardiac disease, obesity, autoimmune conditions) considered potentially associated with susceptibility to infection/adverse outcome of infection, or twin/triplet pregnancy, which may further complicate COVID-19 disease. Most cases with known fetal outcomes reported normal newborns including preterm/low birth weight infants, which occurred in many cases involving emergent preterm delivery due to deteriorating maternal conditions. The remaining smaller proportion of cases involved abnormal newborn/perinatal/postperinatal complications (eg, premature births, respiratory distress, alveolar damage, meconium aspiration with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy), intrauterine/neonatal death (due to multiple concurrent complications such as neonatal sepsis, hypoxemia/acute respiratory distress, potential cardiac damage, mucormycosis) and congenital anomaly (eg, intrauterine growth restriction in association with contracting COVID-19). Among infants tested within our dataset, 28 cases involved reference to infants who tested positive for COVID-19 infection at birth or shortly thereafter, with vertical transmission suspected only in 2 infants. IMPLICATION: This large retrospective case series provides additional perspectives regarding potential impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes, and its characterization of this case volume may contribute to the current information landscape related to COVID-19 in pregnancy. Further studies may be warranted to confirm the generalizability of our findings to the general pregnant patient population infected with COVID-19.

Maternal outcomes of conservative management and cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cesarean hysterectomy as a traditional therapeutic maneuver for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has been associated with serious morbidity, conservative management has been used in many institutions to treat women with PAS. This systematic review aims to compare maternal outcomes according to conservative management or cesarean hysterectomy in women with placenta accreta spectrum disorders. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and four Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Wanfang database and VIP database) to May 2024. Included studies were to be retrospective or prospective in design and compare and report relevant maternal outcomes according to conservative management (the placenta left partially or totally in situ) or cesarean hysterectomy in women with PAS. A risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated for categorical outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the observational studies. All analyses were performed using STATA version 18.0. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with cesarean hysterectomy, PAS women undergoing conservative management showed lower estimated blood loss [WMD - 1623.83; 95% CI: -2337.87, -909.79], required fewer units of packed red blood cells [WMD - 2.37; 95% CI: -3.70, -1.04] and units of fresh frozen plasma transfused [WMD - 0.40; 95% CI: -0.62, -0.19], needed a shorter mean operating time [WMD - 73.69; 95% CI: -90.52, -56.86], and presented decreased risks of bladder injury [RR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.50], ICU admission [RR 0.24; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.52] and coagulopathy [RR 0.20; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.74], but increased risk for endometritis [RR 10.91; 95% CI: 1.36, 87.59] and readmission [RR 8.99; 95% CI: 4.00, 12.21]. The incidence of primary or delayed hysterectomy rate was 25% (95% CI: 19-32, I2 = 40.88%) and the use of uterine arterial embolization rate was 78% (95% CI: 65-87, I2 = 48.79%) in conservative management. CONCLUSION: Conservative management could be an effective alternative to cesarean hysterectomy when women with PAS desire to preserve the uterus and are informed about the limitations of conservative management. PROSPERO ID: CRD42023484578.

Perinatal outcomes in grand multiparous women stratified by parity- A large multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of each additional delivery among grand multiparous (GMP) women on maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: A multi-center retrospective cohort study that examined maternal and neonatal outcomes of GMP women (parity 5-10, analyzed separately for each parity level) compared to a reference group of multiparous women (parity 2-4). The study population included grand multiparous women with singleton gestation who delivered in one of four university-affiliated obstetrical centers in a single geographic area, between 2003 and 2021. We excluded nulliparous, those with parity > 10 (due to small sample sizes), women with previous cesarean deliveries (CDs), multifetal gestations, and out-of-hospital deliveries. The primary outcome of this study was postpartum hemorrhage (PPH, estimated blood loss exceeding 1000 ml, and/or requiring blood product transfusion, and/or a hemoglobin drop > 3 g/Dl). Secondary outcomes included unplanned cesarean deliveries, preterm delivery, along with other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: During the study period, 251,786 deliveries of 120,793 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those, 173,113 (69%) were of parity 2-4 (reference group), 27,894 (11%) were of parity five, 19,146 (8%) were of parity six, 13,115 (5%) were of parity seven, 8903 (4%) were of parity eight, 5802 (2%) were of parity nine and 3813 (2%) were of parity ten. GMP women exhibited significantly higher rates of PPH starting from parity eight. The adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were 1.19 (95 % CI: 1.06-1.34) for parity 8, 1.17 (95 % CI: 1.01-1.36) for parity 9, and 1.39 (95 % CI: 1.18-1.65) for parity 10. Additionally, they showed elevated rates of several maternal and neonatal outcomes, including placental abruption, large-for-gestational age (LGA) neonates, neonatal hypoglycemia, and neonatal seizures. Conversely, they exhibited decreased risk for other adverse maternal outcomes, including preterm deliveries, unplanned cesarean deliveries (CDs), vacuum-assisted delivery, and third- or fourth-degree perineal tears and small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonates. The associations with neonatal hypoglycemia, and neonatal seizure were correlated with the number of deliveries in a dose-dependent manner, demonstrating that each additional delivery was associated with an additional, significant impact on obstetrical complications. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that parity 8-10 is associated with a significantly increased risk of PPH. Parity level > 5 correlated with increased odds of placental abruption, LGA neonates, neonatal hypoglycemia, and neonatal seizures. However, GMP women also demonstrated a reduced likelihood of certain adverse maternal outcomes, including unplanned cesarean, preterm deliveries, vacuum-assisted deliveries, SGA neonates, and severe perineal tears. These findings highlight the importance of tailored obstetrical care for GMP women to mitigate the elevated risks associated with higher parity.

Effect of maternal obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) on feto-maternal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mental health disorders in pregnant women have been related to unfavorable obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) significantly distresses mothers and affects the maternal-infant bond. OBJECTIVES: The present meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to assess the association of maternal OCD with adverse feto-maternal outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search was undertaken in the five databases-Cochrane, Embase, ProQuest, Web of Science, and PubMed-on September 5, 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies that included pregnant women with OCD in whom the feto-maternal outcomes were reported were included in the systematic review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two pass screening ("title-abstract screening" followed by "full-text review"), and data extraction by two authors independently using the Nested-Knowledge Auto living semi-automated systematic review platform was carried out. The decision for selected studies was reviewed by a third author. Of the 360 studies identified, eight were included for the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 24 maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes assessed, 11 were found to be associated with maternal OCD, notably pre-eclampsia (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.57), antepartum hemorrhage or placental abruption (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.13-1.54), postpartum hemporrhage (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.31), cesarean section delivery (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.41), emergency cesarean section (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.15-1.30), preterm birth (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21-1.64), low birth weight (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.28-1.54), low Apgar score at 5 min (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.32-4.27), neonatal hypoglycemia (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.53), neonatal respiratory distress (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.44-2.16), and major congenital malformations (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.08-1.74). CONCLUSION: OCD in pregnant women might be associated with multiple adverse feto-maternal outcomes.

Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes in mothers with non-congenital mitral valve stenosis and healthy control.

Background: Physiological changes during pregnancy cause complications in mothers with mitral stenosis and their infants. This study was designed to assess maternal and fetal pregnancy outcomes in women with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis and compare them with the control group. Materials and methods: This study is a case-control study on 153 pregnant women, including 51 with mitral stenosis (MS) and 102 without MS as the control group, between 2007-2022. For each studied patient, two control participants were selected and matched in residence, age, and year of pregnancy. SPSS version 22 was used for data analysis. Results: The mean age was 31.7 ± 4.6 years in cases and 31.6 ± 4.7 in the healthy controls. Demographic variables were not significantly different between the case and control groups. The rate of stillbirth (5.9% vs. 0.0%), %), NICU admission (13.7% vs. 2.0%), and IUGR (5.9% vs. 0.0%) were higher in the fetal case group compared with the control group. On the other hand, maternal outcomes, including pulmonary edema (13.7% vs. 0.0%), ICU admission (23.5% vs. 0.0%), limb edema (15.7% vs. 0.0%), dyspnea (37.3% vs. 0.0%), pulmonary hypertension (9.8% vs. 0.0%), palpitations (21.1% vs. 0.0%) and hospital admission during pregnancy (37.2% vs. 4.9%) were statistically more common in the case groups. Conclusions: Pregnancy is associated with significant fetomaternal morbidities in women with mitral valve heart disease. So they need a multidisciplinary approach in preconception and antenatal care.

Midwife-attended planned home births versus planned hospital births in Spain: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The debate on the safety and outcomes of home versus hospital births highlights the need for evidence-based evaluations of these birthing settings, particularly in Catalonia where both options are available. AIM: To compare sociodemographic characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes between low-risk women opting for home versus hospital births in Catalonia, Spain. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study analysed 3,463 low-risk births between 2016 and 2018, including 2,713 hospital and 750 home births. Researchers collected sociodemographic data, birthing processes, and outcomes, using statistical analysis to explore differences between the settings. FINDINGS: Notable differences emerged: Women choosing home births typically had higher education levels and were predominantly Spanish. They were 3.43 times more likely to have a spontaneous birth and significantly less likely to undergo instrumental births than those in hospitals. Home births were associated with higher utilization of non-pharmacological analgesia and a more pronounced tendency to iniciate breastfeeding within the first hour post birth and stronger inclination towards breastfeeding. Hospital births, conversely, showed higher use of the lithotomy position and epidural analgesia. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Home births managed by midwives offered better obstetric and neonatal outcomes for low-risk women than hospital births. These results suggest home birth as a safe, viable option that promotes natural birthing processes and reduces medical interventions. The study supports the integration of midwife-led home birth into public health policies, affirming its benefits for maternal and neonatal health.

Impact of 'decision-to-delivery' interval on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a retrospective study of emergency caesarean section from 2017 to 2021 at a secondary health facility in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) for a caesarean section is among the factors that reflect the quality of care a pregnant woman receives and the impact on maternal and foetal outcomes and should not exceed 30 min especially for Category 1 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Herein, we evaluated the effect of decision-to-delivery interval on the maternal and perinatal outcomes among emergency caesarean deliveries at a secondary health facility in north-central Nigeria. METHODS: We conducted a four-year retrospective descriptive analysis of all emergency caesarean sections at a secondary health facility in north-central Nigeria. We included pregnant mothers who had emergency caesarean delivery at the study site from February 10, 2017, to February 9, 2021. RESULTS: Out of 582 who underwent an emergency caesarean section, 550 (94.5%) had a delayed decision-to-delivery interval. The factors associated with delayed decision-to-delivery interval included educational levels (both parents), maternal occupation, and booking status. The delayed decision-to-delivery interval was associated with an increase in perinatal deaths with an odds ratio (OR) of 6.9 (95% CI, 3.166 to 15.040), and increased odds of Special Care Baby Unit (SCBU) admissions (OR 9.8, 95% CI 2.417 to 39.333). Among the maternal outcomes, delayed decision-to-delivery interval was associated with increased odds of sepsis (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.960 to 8.933), hypotension (OR 3.8, 95% 1.626 TO 9.035), and cardiac arrest (OR 19.5, 95% CI 4.634 to 82.059). CONCLUSION: This study shows a very low optimum DDI, which was associated with educational levels, maternal occupation, and booking status. The delayed DDI increased the odds of perinatal deaths, SCBU admission, and maternal-related complications.

Association between subchorionic hematoma in the first trimester and outcomes of singleton pregnancies achieved through assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between first trimester (≤ 12 weeks gestation) subchorionic hemorrhage (SCH), and maternal and neonatal outcomes in women who conceived with the help of assisted reproductive technique (ART). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for observational studies that specifically focused on women who achieved pregnancy via ART and investigated the relationship between early pregnancy (within 12 weeks of gestation) SCH and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Only studies with singleton pregnancies and reporting data on the comparator group (women without SCH) were included. Primary outcomes of interest included incidences of early (within 20 weeks of gestation) pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, caesarean section, and live birth rates. Pooled effect sizes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Nine studies were included. All studies had a cohort design. In all studies, the primary assisted reproduction technique used was in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Compared to pregnancies without SCH, women with diagnosed early pregnancy SCH have a similar risk of preterm birth (< 37 weeks) (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83, 1.22), low birth weight (< 2500 g) (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.59, 1.73) and fetal growth restriction (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.62, 4.02). The gestational age (in weeks) (weighted mean difference (WMD) - 0.06, 95% CI - 0.18, 0.06) and the birth weight (in grams) (WMD - 16.5, 95% CI - 62.9, 29.8) were also similar in the two groups. The odds of early pregnancy loss (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.97, 2.01), live birth (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55, 1.08) and caesarean delivery (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.81, 1.16) were statistically similar in both groups. The risk of maternal adverse outcomes such as gestational diabetes (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.74, 1.29), hypertensive disorder (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.63, 1.43), premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.90, 2.05) and placental abruption (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.57, 10.5) was also similar in both the groups. There was no evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that SCH may not significantly increase the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies conceived through ART, particularly IVF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42024533996.

Antenatal pyelonephritis hospitalisation trends, risk factors and associated adverse outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse trends, risk factors and adverse outcomes associated with antenatal pyelonephritis hospitalisations. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: A national sample of US delivery hospitalisations with associated antenatal hospitalisations. POPULATION: US delivery hospitalisations in the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2010 to 2020. METHODS: Antenatal hospitalisations with a pyelonephritis diagnosis within the 9 months before delivery hospitalisation were analysed. Clinical, demographic and hospital risk factors associated with antenatal pyelonephritis hospitalisations were analysed with unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models with unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios as measures of effect. Temporal trends in antenatal pyelonephritis hospitalisations were analysed with Joinpoint regression to determine the relative measure of average annual percent change (AAPC). Risk for severe maternal morbidity and sepsis during antenatal pyelonephritis hospitalisations was similarly analysed with Joinpoint regression. RESULTS: Of an estimated 10.2 million delivery hospitalisations, 49 140 (0.48%) had an associated antenatal pyelonephritis hospitalisation. The proportion of deliveries with a preceding antenatal pyelonephritis hospitalisation decreased by 29% from 0.56% in 2010 to 0.40% in 2020 (AAPC -2.9%, 95% CI -4.0% to -1.9%). Antenatal pyelonephritis decreased, but risk for sepsis diagnoses increased during these hospitalisations from 3.7% in 2010 to 18.0% in 2020 (AAPC 17.2%, 95% CI 14.2%-21.1%). Similarly, risk for severe morbidity increased from 2.6% in 2010 to 4.4% in 2020 (AAPC 5.5%, 95% CI 0.8%-10.7%). CONCLUSION: Antenatal pyelonephritis admissions appear to be decreasing in the USA. However, these hospitalisations are associated with a rising risk for sepsis and severe maternal morbidity.

Comparison of perinatal and neonatal outcomes of symptomatic pregnancy infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Objective: In this study, maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with positive severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA tests were evaluated according to their symptomatic status. The clinical progression of SARS-CoV-2-positive pregnant women and the effect of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) on newborns was investigated. Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary pandemic hospital specializing in caring for pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2. We included patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test at delivery, subdividing them into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. Results: Two hundred and forty-nine patients were included in the study. The mean age of the pregnant women in the symptomatic group was higher than those in the asymptomatic group (p=0.001). The iatrogenic preterm birth rates in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were 43.37% and 8.43%, respectively (p<0.001). Cesarean section rate was higher in symptomatic group (p=0.01). Maternal death was significantly higher in symptomatic pregnant women (p<0.001). The neonatal intensive care unit admission rate was higher in symptomatic pregnant women (p<0.001). Conclusion: The maternal and fetal outcomes for mothers with symptomatic infections tend to be worse, highlighting the importance of careful management, good follow-up and the advisability of closer monitoring.

Unveiling therapeutic potentials and exploring maternal-fetal health benefits of metformin in pregnancy: A scoping review.

This scoping review synthesizes evidence on metformin's use during pregnancy, encompassing diverse conditions like gestational diabetes, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and obesity. Metformin demonstrates comparable efficacy to insulin in gestational diabetes, positive outcomes in type 2 diabetes pregnancies, and potential benefits in reducing complications. The review highlights nuances in its effects across conditions, indicating advantages such as reduced risk of macrosomia and cesarean section in gestational diabetes. However, its prophylactic role in preventing gestational diabetes and associated complications remains inconclusive. In obese pregnant women, mixed results are observed, with potential benefits in reducing pre-eclampsia risk. Metformin shows promise in preventing preterm birth and late miscarriage in PCOS pregnancies. Categorizing patient subgroups is crucial for identifying advantages, especially in gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Challenges arise from study heterogeneity, necessitating standardized indications for dosage, timing, and postpartum follow ups. Efforts to identify patient characteristics influencing metformin efficacy are crucial for tailored therapy. Although metformin emerges as a viable option in complicated pregnancies, comprehensive research, standardized protocols, and subgroup identification efforts will enhance clinical utility, ensuring evidence-based therapies and optimal maternal and fetal outcomes. Bridging existing knowledge gaps remains imperative for advancing metformin's role in pregnancy management.

Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Placenta Previa: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence.

Placenta previa poses significant risks to maternal and perinatal health, yet its management remains challenging. This comprehensive review synthesizes current evidence on maternal and perinatal outcomes in placenta previa, addressing its epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management strategies. Placenta previa complicates pregnancies, with increasing incidence linked to factors such as advanced maternal age and rising cesarean rates. Maternal complications, including hemorrhage and placenta accreta spectrum disorders, pose substantial risks. At the same time, perinatal outcomes are marked by increased rates of preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Timely diagnosis and appropriate management, including antenatal corticosteroids and multidisciplinary care, are critical for optimizing outcomes. Future research should focus on improving diagnostic methods, evaluating novel interventions, and assessing long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. This review underscores the importance of informed clinical practice and ongoing research efforts to enhance outcomes for women and infants affected by placenta previa.