The Role of Social Determinants in Diagnosis Timing for Fetal Care Center-Eligible Conditions: A Scoping Review.

Timely identification of fetal conditions enables comprehensive evaluation, counseling, postnatal planning, and prenatal treatments. This study assessed the existing evidence on how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence diagnosis timing of fetal conditions appropriate for care in fetal care centers (FCCs). Eligible studies were conducted in the U.S. and published in English after 1999. We employed the Healthy People 2020 SDOH framework to categorize and analyze data from 16 studies, where 86% focused solely on congenital heart disease (CHD). Studies primarily focused on individual-level SDOH, with only 36% addressing structural-level factors. A total of 31 distinct indicators of SDOH were identified, with 68% being unique to individual studies. Indicators often varied in definition and specificity. Three studies covered all five SDOH categories in the Healthy People 2020 Framework. Studies revealed varying and often conflicting associations with SDOH indicators, with race and ethnicity being the most explored (100%), followed by socioeconomic status (69%), maternal age (57%), residence (43%), and structural factors (29%). Our findings highlight the need for more comprehensive research, including conditions beyond CHD, and the establishment of consensus on indicators of SDOH. Such efforts are necessary to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying factors driving disparities in fetal diagnosis and treatment.

"I don't have a telephone to the fetus": Clinicians' conceptions of fetal patienthood in maternal-fetal surgery counseling.

RATIONALE: Maternal fetal surgery (MFS) has developed rapidly since the 1960s and centers for fetal diagnosis and therapy (CFDT) have proliferated. As a result, CFDT clinicians have intervened with fetuses through pregnant bodies for decades, yet the patienthood status of the fetus and its implications for the pregnant person's autonomy have been relatively unexamined. OBJECTIVE: Our overall research aims were threefold: (1) to explore how clinicians train for and provide counseling for MFS; (2) to examine how clinicians assess fetal patienthood and its implications; and (3) to understand clinicians' professed needs and their recommendations for education and training for the provision of MFS counseling. This focuses on aim two. METHOD: In this qualitative study, conducted using in-depth interviews, we examined how 20 clinicians from 17 different sites understood fetal patienthood, how that affected their counseling of pregnant patients, and whether they drew on extant ethical frameworks for guidelines. RESULTS: We identified three major themes: 1) Clinicians entered fetal surgery consultations with assumptions about fetal patienthood (frequently informed by beliefs about fetal viability, maternal attachment, and disciplinary perspectives); 2) they consciously assessed their pregnant patients' connections to their fetus to inform or re-calibrate their own understandings of fetal patienthood; and 3) they used a threshold -based conceptualization whereby the fetus achieved patienthood after crossing a symbolic boundary, often related to the clinician's ability to intervene. CONCLUSIONS: Few clinicians invoked an extant ethical framework to determine fetal patienthood; most asserted that they did not view directive counseling toward MFS as appropriate, instead working diligently to protect pregnant patients' autonomy and rights to self-determination.

Prenatal Spina Bifida Repair: Defendable Trespassing of MOMS Criteria Results in Commendable Personalized Medicine.

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesize that after publication of the quintessence of the MOMS trial, eligibility criteria for prenatal spina bifida (SB) repair may be modified if a tenable argumentation underlies this decision. METHODS: Our first 154 fetal surgery patients were analyzed with particular focus on how many, which, and why the original eligibility criteria, set forth by the MOMS Trial Protocol, were disobeyed, and what the eventually detectable, negative and positive impacts of these deviations on outcomes were. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients (2 missing consent) were included (100%). In 69 patients (45.4%), a total of 89 eligibility criteria were disobeyed. In 54 (35.6%) cases, the following maternal criteria were concerned: gestational age at operation of >25+6 weeks in 17 (11.2%), uterine pathologies in 13 (8.6%) women, preoperative BMI ≥35 kg/m2 in 12 (7.9%), previous hysterotomy in 7 (4.6%), previous prematurity in 3 (2%), HIV/hepatitis B in 2 (1.3%), psychosocial issues in 2 (1.3%), and placenta praevia in 1 (0.7%). In 32 (21.1%) cases, fetal criteria were disobeyed 34 times: Fetal anomaly unrelated to SB in 19 (12.5%), no/minimal evidence of hindbrain herniation in 13 (8.6%), and severe kyphosis in 2 (1.3%). We could not identify cases where non-observation of criteria led to clear-cut maternal and/or fetal disadvantages. CONCLUSION: This study shows that MOMS trial eligibility criteria for prenatal SB repair should be modified or even abandoned with adequate medical and ethical argumentation, and with written parental informed consent after non-directive, full disclosure counseling. This clear-cut change of paradigm is a necessity as it leads toward personalized medicine, allowing more fetuses to benefit from fetal surgery than would have benefitted with the former, published, MOMS criteria in place.

"We All Want to Be Able to Tell You Something Hopeful": Clinicians' Experiences Providing Maternal-Fetal Surgery Counseling.

INTRODUCTION: Prenatal counseling about maternal-fetal surgery can be traumatic and confusing for pregnant people. It can also be technically and emotionally complex for clinicians. As maternal-fetal surgery rapidly advances and becomes more common, more evidence is needed to inform counseling practices. The objective of this study was to develop a deeper understanding of the methods clinicians currently use to train for and provide counseling, as well as their needs and recommendations for future education and training. METHODS: We used interpretive description methods and interviewed interprofessional clinicians who regularly counsel pregnant people about maternal-fetal surgery. RESULTS: We conducted 20 interviews with participants from 17 different sites who were maternal-fetal medicine specialists (30%), pediatric surgeons (30%), nurses (15%), social workers (10%), a genetic counselor (5%), a neonatologist (5%), and a pediatric subspecialist (5%). Most were female (70%), non-Hispanic white (90%), and practiced in the Midwest (50%). We identified four overarching themes: (1) contextualizing maternal-fetal surgery counseling; (2) establishing shared understanding; (3) supporting decision-making; and (4) training for maternal-fetal surgery counseling. Within these themes, we identified key practice differences among professions, specialties, institutions, and regions. CONCLUSION: Participants are committed to practicing informative and supportive counseling to empower pregnant people to make autonomous decisions about maternal-fetal surgery. Nevertheless, our findings indicate a dearth of evidence-based communication practices and guidance. Participants identified significant systemic limitations affecting pregnant people's decision-making options related to maternal-fetal surgery.

Maternal-fetal surgery as part of pediatric palliative care.

Maternal-fetal surgical interventions have become a more common part of prenatal care. This third option, beside termination or post-natal interventions, complicates prenatal decision-making: while interventions may be lifesaving, survivors may face a life with disability. Pediatric palliative care (PPC) is more than end of life or hospice care, it aims at helping patients with complex medical conditions live well. In this paper, we briefly discuss maternal-fetal surgery, challenges regarding counseling and benefit-risk evaluation, argue that PPC should be a routine part of prenatal consultation, discuss the pivotal role of the maternal-fetal surgeon in the PCC-team, and finally discuss some of the ethical considerations of maternal-fetal surgery. We illustrate this with a case example of an infant diagnosed with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

The Rearing of Maternal-Fetal Surgery: The Maturation of a Field from Conception to Adulthood.

Maternal-fetal surgery is fraught with inherent controversy from within the medical community and general public. Despite these challenges, the field of maternal-fetal surgery evolved into an international enterprise. Carefully nurtured by pioneers with foresight and resilience, the field navigated ethical dilemmas with rigorous scientific methodology, collaboration, transparency, and accordance. These central pillars are consistent throughout the brief but momentous history of maternal-fetal surgery, serving as the catalyst for its success. The maturation of fetal intervention is an exemplar of technological innovation propelling clinical innovation, as well as a celebration of mastering the delicate balance between caution and optimism.

Understanding Sociodemographic Disparities in Maternal-Fetal Surgery Study Participation.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Although maternal-fetal surgery to treat fetal anomalies such as spina bifida continues to grow more common, potential health disparities in the field remain relatively unexamined. To address this gap, we identified maternal-fetal surgery studies with the highest level of evidence and analyzed the reporting of participant sociodemographic characteristics and representation of racial and ethnic groups. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature using biomedical databases. We selected randomized control trials (RCTs) and cohort studies with comparison groups published in English from 1990 to May 5, 2020. We included studies from across the globe that examined the efficacy of fetal surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), obstructive uropathy, congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), myelomeningocele (MMC), thoracic lesions, cardiac malformations, or sacrococcygeal teratoma. We determined the frequency of reporting of age, gravidity/parity, race, ethnicity, education level, language spoken, insurance, income level, and relationship status. We identified whether sociodemographic factors were used as inclusion or exclusion criteria. We calculated the racial and ethnic group representation for studies in the USA using the participation-to-prevalence ratio (PPR). RESULTS: We included 112 studies (10 RCTs, 102 cohort) published from 1990-1999 (8%), 2000-2009 (30%), and 2010-2020 (62%). Most studies were conducted in the USA (47%) or Europe (38%). The median sample size was 58. TTTS was the most common disease group (37% of studies), followed by MMC (23%), and CDH (21%). The most frequently reported sociodemographic variables were maternal age (33%) and gravidity/parity (20%). Race and/or ethnicity was only reported in 12% of studies. Less than 10% of studies reported any other sociodemographic variables. Sociodemographic variables were used as exclusion criteria in 13% of studies. Among studies conducted in the USA, White persons were consistently overrepresented relative to their prevalence in the US disease populations (PPR 1.32-2.11), while Black or African-American, Hispanic or Latino, Asian, American-Indian or Alaska-Native, and Native-Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander persons were consistently underrepresented (PPR 0-0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic reporting quality in maternal-fetal surgery studies is poor and inhibits examination of potential health disparities. Participants enrolled in studies in the USA do not adequately represent the racial and ethnic diversity of the population across disease groups.

Fetal-Maternal Surgery for Spina Bifida in a HIV-Infected Mother.

INTRODUCTION: In select cases, in utero surgery for myelomeningocele (MMC) leads to better outcomes than postnatal repair. However, maternal HIV infection constitutes a formal exclusion criterion due to the potential of vertical HIV transmission. Encouraged by a previous case of a successful fetal spina bifida repair in a Hepatitis Bs antigen-positive woman, a plan was devised allowing for fetal surgery. CASE REPORT: In utero MMC repair was performed although the mother was HIV-infected. To minimize the risk of in utero HIV transmission, the mother was treated by highly active antiretroviral therapy throughout gestation as well as intravenous zi-dovudine administration during maternal-fetal surgery. The mother tolerated all procedures very well without any sequelae. The currently 20 month-old toddler is HIV negative and has significantly benefitted from fetal surgery. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This case shows that maternal HIV is not a priori a diagnosis that excludes fetal surgery. Rather, it might be a surrogate for moving towards personalized medicine and away from applying too rigorous exclusion criteria in the selection of candidates for maternal-fetal surgery.

Ethical considerations of maternal-fetal surgery.

The practice of maternal-fetal surgery (MFS) has expanded from lethal fetal conditions to conditions which are significantly disabling but not a lethal fetal abnormality. The inclusion of myelomeningocele within the scope of MFS in the 1990s sparked a renewed debate over the ethics of MFS. While demonstrating increasing efficacy and range of application, MFS continues to be ethically fraught due to the inherent tension between maternal and fetal interests. Ethical issues central to MFS include the patienthood of the fetus; the balance of risks and benefits between the woman and fetus; informed consent for experimental procedures; and determination of conditions that meet ethical qualifications for MFS intervention. These concerns are likely to persist and evolve as perinatal medicine continues to advance. Here we summarize the current state of MFS ethics, highlighting the major positions in the literature thus far as well as examine future directions. It is essential robust discussions of these important issues continue both to ensure ethical medical practice and to provide support to clinicians, pregnant women, and their families.

Placental Location in Maternal-Fetal Surgery for Myelomeningocele.

INTRODUCTION: Uterine incision based on the placental location in open maternal-fetal surgery (OMFS) has never been evaluated in regard to maternal or fetal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether an anterior placenta was associated with increased rates of intraoperative, perioperative, antepartum, obstetric, or neonatal complications in mothers and babies who underwent OMFS for fetal myelomeningocele (fMMC) closure. METHODS: Data from the international multicenter prospective registry of patients who underwent OMFS for fMMC closure (fMMC Consortium Registry, December 15, 2010-June 31, 2019) was used to compare fetal and maternal outcomes between anterior and posterior placental locations. RESULTS: The placental location for 623 patients was evenly distributed between anterior (51%) and posterior (49%) locations. Intraoperative fetal bradycardia (8.3% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.005) and performance of fetal resuscitation (3.6% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.034) occurred more frequently in cases with an anterior placenta when compared to those with a posterior placenta. Obstetric outcomes including membrane separation, placental abruption, and spontaneous rupture of membranes were not different among the 2 groups. However, thinning of the hysterotomy site (27.7% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.008) occurred more frequently in cases of an anterior placenta. Gestational age (GA) at delivery (p = 0.583) and length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (p = 0.655) were similar between the 2 groups. Fetal incision dehiscence and wound revision were not significantly different between groups. Critical clinical outcomes including fetal demise, perinatal death, and neonatal death were all infrequent occurrences and not associated with the placental location. CONCLUSIONS: An anterior placental location is associated with increased risk of intraoperative fetal resuscitation and increased thinning at the hysterotomy closure site. Individual institutional experiences may have varied, but the aggregate data from the fMMC Consortium did not show a significant impact on the GA at delivery or maternal or fetal clinical outcomes.

Maternal-Fetal Surgery: Does Recognising Fetal Patienthood Pose a Threat to Pregnant Women's Autonomy?

Maternal-fetal surgery (MFS) encompasses a range of innovative procedures aiming to treat fetal illnesses and anomalies during pregnancy. Their development and gradual introduction into healthcare raise important ethical issues concerning respect for pregnant women's bodily integrity and autonomy. This paper asks what kind of ethical framework should be employed to best regulate the practice of MFS without eroding the hard-won rights of pregnant women. I examine some existing models conceptualising the relationship between a pregnant woman and the fetus to determine what kind of framework is the most adequate for MFS, and conclude that an ecosystem or maternal-fetal dyad model is best suited for upholding women's autonomy. However, I suggest that an appropriate framework needs to incorporate some notion of fetal patienthood, albeit a very limited one, in order to be consistent with the views of healthcare providers and their pregnant patients. I argue that such an ethical framework is both theoretically sound and fundamentally respectful of women's autonomy, and is thus best suited to protect women from coercion or undue paternalism when deciding whether to undergo MFS.

Open fetal surgery for myelomeningocele repair in France.

INTRODUCTION: Open fetal myelomeningocele (MMC) surgery is currently the standard of care option for prenatal MMC repair. We described the population referred to our center and reviewed outcome after open fetal MMC repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients referred to our center for MMC were reviewed from July 2014 to June 2020. For all the patients who underwent fetal MMC repair, surgical details, maternal characteristics and data from the neonatal to the three-years-old evaluations were collected. RESULTS: Among the 126 patients referred to our center, 49.2% were eligible and 27.4% (n = 17) of them underwent fetal MMC repair. Average gestational age at fetal surgery was 24+6 weeks. There was no case of fetal complication and the only maternal complication was one case of transfusion. We recorded 70% of premature rupture of membranes and 47% of premature labor. Average gestational age at delivery was 34+2 weeks and no patient delivered before 30 weeks. There was no case of uterine scar dehiscence or maternal complication during cesarean section. After birth, 59% of the children had a hindbrain herniation reversal. At 1-year-old, 42% were assigned a functional level of one or more better than expected according to the prenatal anatomic level and 25% required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. At 3-year-old, all the children attended school and 75% were able to walk with orthotics or independently. CONCLUSION: Open fetal surgery enables anatomical repair of the MMC lesion, a potential benefit on cerebral anomalies and motor function, with a low rate of perinatal and maternal complications.

The parental journey of fetal care: a systematic review and metasynthesis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to synthesize the qualitative literature on parental experiences of fetal care to reflect events that happened across the continuum of care and to better understand parents' positive and negative experiences with care delivery. DATA SOURCES: Eligible studies published until June 2020 were retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EBSCO CINAHL, Web of Science, and ProQuest. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies must have been: (1) published in English in a peer-reviewed journal or in ProQuest, (2) available in full text, (3) contained a qualitative component, and (4) focused on expectant parents' experiences of tertiary, coordinated, multidisciplinary prenatal diagnosis and care related to a fetal anomaly. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Researchers used the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. A metastudy and an interpretive description approach was taken to synthesize the events that happened across the continuum of care and the themes associated with a positive care experience. RESULTS: The metasynthesis included 13 studies and 217 patients from 11 different multidisciplinary fetal diagnosis and intervention practices across North America and Europe. We identified key events that influenced parental experience of fetal care across the continuum. The themes associated with a positive care experience are parents (1) gaining understanding and feeling understood, (2) realizing agency and control, and (3) finding hope and meaning. We identified aspects of healthcare delivery that served as barriers or facilitators to these positive experiences. CONCLUSION: Understanding the commonalities of the parental experience of fetal care across diverse settings creates a foundation for improving care and better meeting the needs of parents undergoing a painful and life-defining event. Although health outcomes are not always positive, a positive experience of care is possible and can assist parents to cope with their grief, manage their expectations, and engage in their care. The findings of this study illustrate the ways in which healthcare delivery can facilitate or obstruct a positive care experience.

Open Fetal Surgical Outcomes for Myelomeningocele Closure Stratified by Maternal Body Mass Index in a Large Single-Center Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Open maternal-fetal surgery for in utero closure of myelomeningocele (MMC) has become an accepted treatment option for prenatally diagnosed open neural tube defects. Historically, this option has been limited to women with BMI < 35 due to concern for increasing complications in patients with obesity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate maternal, obstetric, and fetal/neonatal outcomes stratified by maternal BMI classification in women who undergo open maternal-fetal surgery for fetal myelomeningocele (fMMC) closure. METHODS: A single-center fMMC closure registry was queried for maternal demographics, preoperative factors, fetal surgery outcomes, delivery outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. Data were stratified based on maternal BMI: <30, 30-34.99, and ≥35-40, corresponding to normal weight/overweight, obesity class I, and obesity class II. Statistical analysis was performed using statistical software SAS v.9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). RESULTS: A total of 264 patients were analyzed, including 196 (74.2%) with BMI <30, 54 (20.5%) with BMI 30-34.99, and 14 (5.3%) with BMI ≥ 35-40. Maternal demographics and preoperative characteristics were similar among the groups. Operative time increased with increasing BMI; otherwise, perioperative outcomes were similar among the groups. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were similar among the groups. CONCLUSION: Increasing maternal BMI did not result in a negative impact on maternal, obstetric, and fetal/neonatal outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing open maternal-fetal surgery for fMMC closure. Further study is warranted to determine the generalizability of these results.

Open fetal surgery for neural tube defects.

The most common congenital defect of the central nervous system is myelomeningocele (MMC), which results in significant physical limitations for those affected. Neurologic injury associated with MMC begins with abnormal neurulation and is perpetuated by subsequent traumatic and toxic injury sustained in utero. Treatment historically has involved surgical closure of the MMC after birth along with neonatal management of the associated sequelae including cerebrospinal fluid diversion by ventricular shunting. With improvements in prenatal diagnosis, a defined antenatal natural history, and the concept of fetal intervention to arrest or reverse ongoing in utero damage, maternal-fetal surgery for MMC closure developed as a feasible therapy. Animal studies and early human studies investigating in utero MMC closure were promising, leading to Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS trial). This prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing in utero fetal MMC (fMMC) closure to routine postnatal closure demonstrated a decreased need for shunting, reversal of hindbrain herniation, and improved neurologic function in the prenatal repair group, although maternal complications and prematurity were more frequently encountered. Because of the conclusion of the MOMS trial, fMMC closure has become a standard of care option for pregnancies complicated by a prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida. This article will provide background to the scope of MMC, review the MOMS trial data, and highlight the current clinical status of open fMMC closure.

Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after open maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele.

BACKGROUND: Open maternal-fetal surgery for fetal myelomeningocele results in reduction in neonatal morbidity related to spina bifida but may be associated with fetal, neonatal, and maternal complications in subsequent pregnancies. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to ascertain obstetric risk in subsequent pregnancies after open maternal-fetal surgery for fetal myelomeningocele closure. STUDY DESIGN: An international multicenter prospective observational registry created to track and report maternal, obstetric, fetal/neonatal, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes following open maternal-fetal surgery for fetal myelomeningocele was evaluated for subsequent pregnancy outcome variables. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for the registry. RESULTS: From 693 cases of open maternal-fetal surgery for fetal myelomeningocele closure entered into the registry, 77 subsequent pregnancies in 60 women were identified. The overall live birth rate was 96.2%, with 52 pregnancies delivering beyond 20 weeks gestational age and median gestational age at delivery of 37 (36.3-37.1) weeks. The uterine rupture rate was 9.6% (n = 5), resulting in 2 fetal deaths. Maternal transfusion was required in 4 patients (7.7%). CONCLUSION: The risk of uterine rupture or dehiscence in subsequent pregnancies with associated fetal morbidity after open maternal-fetal surgery is significant, but is similar to that reported for subsequent pregnancies after classical cesarean deliveries. Future pregnancy considerations should be included in initial counseling for women contemplating open maternal-fetal surgery.

The experience of parents with children with myelomeningocele who underwent prenatal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele (MMC) has been demonstrated to have benefits over postnatal surgery. Nevertheless, prenatal surgery requires a significant emotional, physical, and financial commitment from the entire family. METHODS: Mixed methods study of parents' perceptions regarding provider communication, treatment choices, and the family impact of having a child with MMC. RESULTS: Parents of children with MMC (n= 109) completed questionnaires. Parents were well informed and reported gathering information about prenatal surgery from a wide range of sources. After a fetal diagnosis of MMC, most learned about their options from their obstetrician, although one-third were not told about the option of prenatal surgery. About one-fourth of these parents felt pressure to undergo one particular option. Half of parents said that having a child with MMC has had a positive impact on them and their family, while the other half indicated that having a child with MMC has had both positive and negative impacts. The most commonly noted positive impacts were changes in parental attitudes, as well as having new opportunities and relationships. The most frequently reported negative impacts concerned relational and financial strain. The vast majority of parents indicated that they would still undergo prenatal surgery if they could travel back in time with their present knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of the parental experiences and perspectives following prenatal surgery will play an important role in providing overall support for parents and family members.

The ethics of maternal-fetal surgery.

Maternal-fetal surgery is performed on two patients, the pregnant patient and the fetal patient. Ethics is therefore an essential dimension of maternal-fetal surgery. From its beginnings in only a few centers, various procedures have become available in highly specialized centers in developed countries. Innovation and research have played an indispensable role in the development of maternal-fetal surgery and will continue to do so. In this article we present ethically justified criteria, based on the ethical concept of the fetus as a patient, for clinical innovation and research of maternal-fetal surgery and for the professionally responsible transition from innovation and research into clinical practice. These criteria are designed to be used by clinical innovators, clinical investigators, and by oversight committees.

Specialty-Based Variation in Applying Maternal-Fetal Surgery Trial Evidence.

INTRODUCTION: The Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) compared prenatal with postnatal surgery for fetal myelomeningocele (MMC). We sought to understand how subspecialists interpreted the trial results and whether their practice has changed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, mailed survey of 1,200 randomly selected maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physicians, neonatologists, and pediatric surgeons. RESULTS: Of 1,176 eligible physicians, 670 (57%) responded. Compared to postnatal closure, 33% viewed prenatal closure as "very favorable" and 60% as "somewhat favorable." Most physicians reported being more likely to recommend prenatal surgery (69%), while 28% were less likely to recommend pregnancy termination. In multivariable analysis, neonatologists were more likely to report prenatal closure as "very favorable" (OR 1.6; 95% CI: 1.03-2.5). Pediatric surgeons and neonatologists were more likely to recommend prenatal closure (OR 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3-3.3, and OR 2.9; 95% CI: 1.8-4.6) and less likely to recommend termination (OR 3.8; 95% CI: 2.2-6.7, and OR 4.7; 95% CI: 2.7-8.1). In addition, physicians with a higher tolerance for prematurity were more likely to report prenatal closure as "very favorable" (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05). DISCUSSION: In light of the MOMS trial, the vast majority of pediatric subspecialists and MFMs view prenatal MMC closure favorably. These attitudes vary by specialty and risk tolerance.

Impact on family and parental stress of prenatal vs postnatal repair of myelomeningocele.

BACKGROUND: The Management of Myelomeningocele Study was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial that compared prenatal repair with standard postnatal repair for fetal myelomeningocele. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the long-term impact on the families of the women who participated and to evaluate how the timing of repair influenced the impact on families and parental stress. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized women completed the 24-item Impact on Family Scale and the 36-item Parenting Stress Index Short Form at 12 and 30 months after delivery. A revised 15-item Impact on Family Scale describing overall impact was also computed. Higher scores reflected more negative impacts or greater stress. In addition, we examined Family Support Scale and Family Resource Scale scores along with various neonatal outcomes. Repeated measures analysis was conducted for each scale and subscale. RESULTS: Of 183 women randomized, 171 women completed the Impact on Family Scale and 172 completed the Parenting Stress Index at both 12 and 30 months. The prenatal surgery group had significantly lower revised 15-item Impact on Family Scale scores as well as familial-social impact subscale scores compared to the postnatal surgery group (P = .02 and .004, respectively). There was no difference in total parental stress between the 2 groups (P = .89) or in any of the Parenting Stress Index Short Form subscales. In addition, walking independently at 30 months and family resources at 12 months were associated with both family impact and parental stress. CONCLUSION: The overall negative family impact of caring for a child with spina bifida, up to 30 months of age, was significantly lower in the prenatal surgery group compared to the postnatal surgery group. Ambulation status and family resources were predictive of impact on family and parental stress.