La evaluación docente en las residencias médicas: ¿motivación o molestia para los profesores? / Teaching evaluation in medical residencies: motivation or annoyance for teachers?

Introducción: Pocas veces se indaga sobre el significado que tiene para los profesores recibir informes sobre sus competencias docentes en opinión de los médicos residentes. El objetivo de este estudio es comprender la manera en que losprofesores valoran y usan los datos de la evaluación docente (ED) para transformar sus prácticas educativas. Sujetos y métodos: Es un estudio cuantitativo descriptivo por medio de encuesta aplicada en línea durante septiembre y octubre de 2023. La población fue de 896 profesores titulares y adjuntos con nombramiento de 79 especialidades evaluados al menos por los residentes en una ocasión. Respondieron 491 profesores (54,8%). La estructura del instrumento tenía tres secciones: datos sociodemográficos y académicos, preguntas cerradas con escalas de tipo Likert categorizadas en cuatro temas y preguntas abiertas para comentarios escritos.Resultados: Para más del 85%, la ED es un referente que influye en su desempeño docente. El 93,3% está de acuerdo en que la ED ayuda a identificar fortalezas y debilidades. El 75% o más cree que las preguntas del cuestionario que responden los residentes se relacionan con sus prácticas educativas. Conclusiones: La ED es aceptada y valorada positivamente por los docentes, sus respuestas comparten el imaginario colectivo característico de los contextos de educación superior que consideran esta evaluación una estrategia para realimentar y mejorar su desempeño docente, así como para detectar fortalezas y áreas de oportunidad. Se requieren discusiones guiadas sobre las competencias docentes que vayan más allá de los informes individuales con el fin de visibilizar lasdinámicas académicas en la sede.(AU)

Introduction: The meaning of the data given by professors who receive teaching competencies reports in the opinion of resident physicians is rarely investigated. The aim of this study is to understand how teachers value and use teaching evaluation (TE) data to transform their educational practices.Subjects and methods: Quantitative descriptive study by means of an online survey applied during September and October 2023. The population consisted of 896 tenured and associated professors appointed in 79 specialties evaluated by residents at least once. A total of 491 teachers (54.8%) responded. The structure of the instrument had three sections: sociodemographic and academic data, closed-ended questions with Likert-type scales categorized into 4 themes, and open-ended questions for written comments. Results: More than 85% considered TE as a referent that influences their teaching performance. 93.3% agree that TE helps identify strengths and weaknesses. More than 75% believe that the questionnaire items answered by residents relate to their educational practices. Conclusions: TE is accepted and positively valued by teachers, their responses share the collective imaginary characteristic of higher educational contexts that consider this evaluation as a strategy to provide feedback and improve their teaching performance, and to detect strengths and areas of opportunity. Guided discussions on teaching competencies that go beyond individual reports are required to make visible the academic dynamics in each institution.(AU)

Factors affecting the choice of medical specialties in Turkiye: an analysis based on cross-sectional survey of medical graduates.

BACKGROUND: Modern healthcare systems require the right mix of medical specialties for effective provision of high-quality services. Despite increased availability of general physicians and specialists, Türkiye lags behind high-income countries in terms of availability of specialists. The purpose of the study is to identify several specific factors that affect the choice of medical specialization. METHODS: All 350 medical school graduates in a specialty examination preparation bootcamp were requested to participate in the survey and 333 completed the self-administered questionnaire. The survey asked questions about factors affecting choice of medical specialty by medical graduates. RESULTS: The empirical results indicate that surgical specialties, compared to other broad medical specializations, are selected because of its higher income-earning potential and social prestige. The likelihood of selecting surgical specialties is negatively affected by rigorousness of the training program, high work-load, risk of malpractice lawsuits and risk of workplace violence. Male participants were 2.8 times more likely to select surgery specialty compared to basic medical science. Basic medical science areas were selected at a higher rate by female graduates and graduates with high level of academic performance in medical schools. CONCLUSIONS: It is critically important to improve trust and inter-personal communications between the patients and physicians in all specialties to lower the likelihood of malpractice lawsuits and workplace violence. Policy-makers may adopt policies to affect income earning potential and social prestige of targeted specializations to improve their supply.

Changes in Televisit Modalities Due to the COVID Pandemic in Chile: A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted healthcare guidelines and modalities of patient consultation worldwide. The frequent cycles of quarantine confinement in Chile have caused mobility restrictions for patients and physicians, forcing the Hospital Las Higueras de Talcahuano (HHT) to replace the assisted televisit modality with a more classic televisit program. Here we have described if this change in televisit modality and type of outpatient may have impacted patients' satisfaction. METHODS: The patient's perception of satisfaction was evaluated through self-administered survey questionnaires previously validated in Spanish. Cohorts were grouped according to the following two relational models: (i) assisted televisit, 503 neurology patients from 2018 to 2019, and (ii) televisit, 831 patients from different specialties treated during 2020. Perception of satisfaction was compared by gender, age, and type of televisit, and internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) and reliability (factorial analysis of principal components) were assessed. Finally, we compared the patient satisfaction of both modalities. RESULTS: Questionnaires showed excellent internal consistency; all items showed point biserial correlations greater than 0.30. Assisted televisit and televisit cohorts comprised 64.2% and 67.6% females, respectively, and patients under the age of 65 years were 62.2% and 75%, respectively. Assisted televisit patients showed very high 94.4% (n=475) and high 5.2% (n=26) satisfaction levels, while televisit patients showed very high 22.3% (n=185), high 63.9% (n=531), and moderate 13.1% (n=109) satisfaction levels; this difference was statistically significant at p<0.001. CONCLUSION: Lower perception of satisfaction due to the change in televisit relational modality underscores the importance of primary care professionals who support the specialist in the assisted televisit model. However, the televisit modality showed high patient satisfaction and suggested that this modality can be a plausible alternative according to each location's reality. The results of this study indicate that both assisted televisit and televisit contribute to delivering an integrative solution that helps to alleviate the system's fragmentation.

Comparison of medical students' considerations in choosing a specialty: 2020 vs. 2009/10.

BACKGROUND: Workforce shortage in healthcare and particularly in physicians poses a threat to healthcare delivery and its quality. In comparison to other OECD countries, Israel currently has a small number of medical graduates relative to its number of physicians, naturally emphasizing the importance of ensuring that this population chooses to remain in medicine. Understanding what is most important to medical students can help improve working conditions in residency. Such information is particularly needed to facilitate policy planning that will encourage the next generation of physicians to specialize in medical fields that are experiencing shortages. We hypothesized that between 2009/2010 and 2020, there were significant changes in medical students' preferences regarding their considerations for choosing a medical specialty. METHODS: We compared cross-sectional data from questionnaire-based surveys of 5th year medical students performed in 2009-2010 and 2020 at two Israeli universities. RESULTS: Of the 335 medical students who responded (237 and 98 in 2009/2010 and 2020, respectively) those in 2020 were 2.26 less likely vs. those in 2009/2010, to choose a residency for its high-paying potential (P < 0.05), and had significantly more interest in residencies with greater teaching opportunity (98.8% vs 82.9%, P < 0.05), increased responsibility and chances to make clinical decisions on their own (67.9% vs 51.6%, P < 0.05). Criteria important to both the 2009/2010 and 2020 students were choosing a bedside specialty (70.2%vs 67.9%, NS), and an interesting and challenging specialty (95.2%v s 91.3%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: These results partially supported our hypothesis that medical students' preferences have changed over the years, though there are fundamental factors that apparently reflect medical students' nature that do not change over time.

Preferences, Career Aspects, and Factors Influencing the Choice of Specialty by Medical Students and Interns in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background and objective Choosing a medical specialty is one of the most critical career decisions medical students and interns make. However, little is known about the factors these graduates consider when choosing their specialty. Our study assessed factors that medical students and interns consider when determining their specialty. Methods This is a cross-sectional survey-based study, conducted from November to December 2022. We utilized a previously published questionnaire for 1074 participants, including 837 medical students and 237 interns from Saudi Arabian universities. Results The majority of female participants (80.4%), compared with only 19.6% of male participants, considered interest in specific procedures and techniques typical of the specialty an important factor in choosing a specialty (p = 0.036). Dissertation research experience was an important factor for 83.5% of female participants and 16.5% of male participants (p = 0.024). Additionally, good quality teaching within the study program framework was important for 81.2% of female participants and 18.8% of male participants (p = 0.033), suggesting that male and female participants viewed the importance of good quality teaching differently. Female participants accounted for 80% of those who considered the overseas experience a factor in their specialty choice. Also, 74.4% of female and 25.6% of male participants considered friends, relatives, or other connections in the healthcare field a factor that affects their choice. Furthermore, 79.6% of female and 20.4% of male participants reported having good experiences with physician role models as an impactful factor in their specialty choice. Conclusion Female participants were most interested in obstetrics and gynecology (12.1%,), internal medicine (11.8%), and family medicine (10.8%). Male participants, on the other hand, showed more interest in family medicine (12.7%,), internal medicine (11.0%), and emergency medicine (10.1%). Medical schools and healthcare institutions must provide students and interns with enough information and resources to help them explore different specialties and make well-informed decisions about their careers.

Profiling medical specialties and informing aspiring physicians: a data-driven approach.

A detailed, unbiased perspective of the inter-relations among medical fields could help students make informed decisions on their future career plans. Using a data-driven approach, the inter-relations among different medical fields were decomposed and clustered based on the similarity of their working environments.Publicly available, aggregate databases were merged into a single rich dataset containing demographic, working environment and remuneration information for physicians across Canada. These data were collected from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, the Canadian Medical Association, and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, primarily from 2018 to 2019. The merged dataset includes 25 unique medical specialties, each with 36 indicator variables. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to group specialties into distinct clusters based on relatedness.The 25 medical specialties were decomposed into seven clusters (latent variables) that were chosen based on the Bayesian Information Criterion. The Kruskal-Wallis test identified eight indicator variables that significantly differed between the seven profiles. These variables included income, work settings and payment styles. Variables that did not significantly vary between profiles included demographics, professional satisfaction, and work-life balance satisfaction.The 25 analyzed medical specialties were grouped in an unsupervised manner into seven profiles via LPA. These profiles correspond to expected and meaningful groups of specialties that share a common theme and set of indicator variables (e.g. procedurally-focused, clinic-based practice). These profiles can help aspiring physicians narrow down and guide specialty choice.

Preference of medical specialties among medical students in a Chilean university. / Preferencia de especialidades médicas en estudiantes de medicina de una universidad chilena.

This study describes medical specialty preferences expressed by medical students at a regional university in northern Chile. This descriptive study is based on primary information with a sample of 266 valid responses and a response rate of 58.7%. The information was collected through a Google Forms questionnaire before voluntary consent of participation from May to July 2022. We found that the medical specialties preferred by the Universidad Católica del Norte students were clinical specialties, including internal medicine, and medical-surgical specialties, including emergency medicine and gynecology-obstetrics. Women markedly predominated in child and adolescent psychiatry, gynecology-obstetrics, pediatric surgery, pediatrics, and family medicine, while men predominated in radiology and anesthesiology, both associated with indirect patient interaction. We also found that surgical specialties, traditionally preferred by men, could be in the process of generational change, as there is an increase in the presence of women, especially in general surgery.

En este trabajo se describen las preferencias de elección de especialidad médica que manifiestan los estudiantes de la carrera de medicina de una universidad regional del norte de Chile. Se trata de un estudio descriptivo basado en información primaria con una muestra de 266 respuestas válidas, con una tasa de respuesta de 58,7%. La información se recogió a través de un cuestionario disponible en Google Forms, previo consentimiento voluntario de participación, durante los meses de mayo a julio de 2022. Se encontró que las especialidades médicas preferidas por los estudiantes de la Universidad Católica del Norte fueron las especialidades clínicas como medicina interna y las médico-quirúrgicas como medicina de urgencias y ginecología-obstetricia. Además, existen especialidades con un claro predominio femenino como psiquiatría infanto-adolescente, ginecología-obstetricia, cirugía pediátrica, pediatría y medicina familiar, mientras que el predominio masculino destaca en radiología y anestesiología, ambas asociadas a un trato indirecto con el paciente. Se observó que las especialidades quirúrgicas, tradicionalmente preferidas por hombres, podrían estar en proceso de cambio generacional, aumentando la presencia femenina en ellas, sobre todo en cirugía general.

Preferencia de especialidades médicas en estudiantes de medicina de una universidad chilena / Preference of medical specialties among medical students in a Chilean university

En este trabajo se describen las preferencias de elección de especialidad médica que manifiestan los estudiantes de la carrera de medicina de una universidad regional del norte de Chile. Se trata de un estudio descriptivo basado en información primaria con una muestra de 266 respuestas válidas, con una tasa de respuesta de 58,7%. La información se recogió a través de un cuestionario disponible en Google Forms, previo consentimiento voluntario de participación, durante los meses de mayo a julio de 2022. Se encontró que las especialidades médicas preferidas por los estudiantes de la Universidad Católica del Norte fueron las especialidades clínicas como medicina interna y las médico-quirúrgicas como medicina de urgencias y ginecología-obstetricia. Además, existen especialidades con un claro predominio femenino como psiquiatría infanto-adolescente, ginecología-obstetricia, cirugía pediátrica, pediatría y medicina familiar, mientras que el predominio masculino destaca en radiología y anestesiología, ambas asociadas a un trato indirecto con el paciente. Se observó que las especialidades quirúrgicas, tradicionalmente preferidas por hombres, podrían estar en proceso de cambio generacional, aumentando la presencia femenina en ellas, sobre todo en cirugía general.

This study describes medical specialty preferences expressed by medical students at a regional university in northern Chile. This descriptive study is based on primary information with a sample of 266 valid responses and a response rate of 58.7%. The information was collected through a Google Forms questionnaire before voluntary consent of participation from May to July 2022. We found that the medical specialties preferred by the Universidad Católica del Norte students were clinical specialties, including internal medicine, and medical-surgical specialties, including emergency medicine and gynecology-obstetrics. Women markedly predominated in child and adolescent psychiatry, gynecology-obstetrics, pediatric surgery, pediatrics, and family medicine, while men predominated in radiology and anesthesiology, both associated with indirect patient interaction. We also found that surgical specialties, traditionally preferred by men, could be in the process of generational change, as there is an increase in the presence of women, especially in general surgery.

Unpopular medical specialties: exploring the concept that "the customer knows best".

BACKGROUND: Healthcare systems often face shortages of certain medical specialists due to lack of interest among medical students. We questioned a common "one solution fits all" approach to this problem which involves monetary incentives to lure students to these specialties. Instead, we used the marketing principle the "consumer knows best" to explore ways of elucidating the reasons and proposing solutions for such shortages. METHODS: A convenience sample of Israeli 6th-year medical students and interns completed questionnaires to determine why they thought three specialties (geriatrics, anesthesiology, emergency medicine) were unpopular and their ideas on increasing their appeal. RESULTS: 119 6th-year students and 84 interns completed questionnaires. Geriatrics was reported having a problematic patient population; not being interesting and challenging; and not considered prestigious by colleagues and the populace. This contrasts with emergency medicine which, although considered prestigious, has difficult working conditions both during and after residency accompanied by much pressure at work. Although, improvements in lifestyle and remuneration were thought by students and interns as possibly making these specialties more attractive, reducing the pressure at work and decreasing on-call obligations were designated by the students/interns as ways to increase emergency medicine's and anesthesiology's appeal. Half the students replied that anesthesiology would be more appealing if work was in shifts (< 16 h), while 60% replied so for emergency medicine and only 18% for geriatrics. 90% of students reported that control over lifestyle would make emergency medicine more attractive while 55% and 48% replied positively for anesthesiology and geriatrics, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using the concept "consumer knows best" provided additional insight into the specialty selection process. Students/interns have specialty-specific opinions as to why some specialties are unpopular. Their ideas about attracting more students to these specialties were also specialty-dependent, i.e. "one solution does not fit all". These observations render problematic a single solution aimed at ameliorating the workforce shortages of multiple specialties. Instead, these results advocate a differential approach wherein the lack of appeal of each unpopular specialty is analyzed individually and the students'/interns' (the "consumers") ideas sought resulting in solutions tailored to address each specialty's lack of attractiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: None.

Does examining job market awareness among medical students provide insight into the specialty selection process?

BACKGROUND: The future composition of a country's physician workforce depends on medical students' choices of specialties. Students' familiarity with the job market (the healthcare system) they are about to enter and the influence job market conditions have on their choices has not been well explored. This study focuses on whether and how the healthcare system's employment landscape is taken into consideration by medical students and whether this facet adds information about the specialty selection process. METHODS: Fifth-year medical students completed a questionnaire querying their knowledge and perceptions of the national healthcare system, selection criteria for choosing a specialty and a post-residency work position. Data were analyzed with two-tailed Student's t-tests and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 242 students (49% women). Forty per cent were interested in a specialty where it is 'easy to find work' and 64% in a specialty that 'provides job security'. Only 12% were attracted to specialties with empty positions due to a workforce shortage. A high salary was considered an important selection criterion by 45% of students, who were also not deterred by specialties with surplus workforce, especially, if accompanied by high salaries or controllable lifestyles. Only 17% thought it would be easy to find a residency in any hospital in the specialty they chose, reflecting the low rate (3%) of positive responses to the statement that 'there are sufficient residency positions in all specialties'. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the utility of querying medical students about their market awareness when investigating the specialty selection process. Students' poor rating of selection criteria, such as specialties with ease in finding jobs because they are suffering workforce shortages and have empty positions, provide insights and concerns for healthcare leaders. It should aid them in approaching the challenge of attracting students to specialties with workforce shortfalls.KEY MESSAGESThis study demonstrated the feasibility and potential value of adding queries about market awareness when investigating the medical student specialty selection process.Medical students were more interested in a specialty that provides job security than one where it is easy to find work.It could be useful for the healthcare leadership and medical educators in all countries to learn what medical students know about their national healthcare system and whether they need to add more healthcare delivery and system subjects to their curricula.

Overview on and Contextual Determinants of Medical Residencies in North Brazil.

The aim of this study was to analyze the scenario of medical residency programs (MRPs) in the north region of Brazil as well as the contextual determinants (socioeconomic, structural, and epidemiological) influencing the number of MRPs in this region. An ecological study was conducted using MRPs data from 2022. This study used multiple data sources. MRP indicators were described based on the Brazilian state and specialty. The dependent variable was the number of MRPs. The independent variables included sociodemographic, structural, and epidemiological factors. Poisson regression was performed to analyze the association between contextual variables and the number of MRPs. The results showed that only 3.6% of the municipalities had authorized MRPs. The idleness rate in the region was 46.0%, with family and community medicine as the specialties with the greatest idleness. The total density of authorized vacancies in the MRPs was 14.0 vacancies per 100,000 inhabitants. The models showed that with each increase of one unit of the vulnerability index (Socioeconomic Index in the Geographic Context for Health Studies-GeoSES), the number of MRPs increased, ranging from 8122 (p value < 0.001) to 11,138 (p value < 0.001). With each increase in undergraduate degrees in medicine, the number of MRPs increased by 0.945 (p value < 0.001). With each increase of 1 physician per 1000 population, the number of MRPs increased from 0.537 (p value < 0.001) to 0.845 (p value < 0.001). With each increase of one unit in general hospitals, specialized hospitals, teaching hospitals, and primary healthcare units, the number of MRPs increased by 0.176 (p value < 0.001), 0.168 (p value < 0.001), 0.022 (p value < 0.001) and 0.032 (p value < 0.001), respectively. Finally, with each increase of one death per 100,000 inhabitants, the overall mortality rate increased, ranging from 0.006 (p value < 0.001) to 0.022 (p value < 0.001). The study showed a low supply of MRPs in the northern region, a high rate of idleness, and important socioeconomic, structural, and epidemiological determinants of the number of MRPs.

Variables, indicadores y criterios de evaluación del servicio médico como escenario de formación de especialistas

La calidad de la educación de posgrado concebida estratégicamente como la integración de la pertinencia social y la excelencia académica, deviene esencial en la gestión de las instituciones docente-asistenciales del sector salud. Sus múltiples dimensiones deben ser contextualizadas y son susceptibles de análisis y perfeccionamiento en cada servicio médico donde se desarrolla el proceso de formación de especialistas. Se utilizaron métodos teóricos y empíricos, para la identificación de las dificultades y la elaboración de la nueva propuesta. Se obtuvieron criterios sobre los servicios médicos como escenarios de formación, en los que se identificaron los problemas relativos a la actividad de posgrado. La propuesta consideró las directrices estratégicas, la población objeto de atención y los diferentes ámbitos temporales y espaciales identificados, con lo que pretende el fortalecimiento y desarrollo de la formación de posgrado en las Universidades de Ciencias Médicas en Cuba.

The quality of postgraduate education, strategically conceived as the integration of social relevance and academic excellence, becomes essential in the management of teaching-assistance institutions in the health sector. Its multiple dimensions must be contextualized and are susceptible to analysis and improvement in each medical service where the specialist formation process takes place. Theoretical and empirical methods were used, for the identification of the difficulties and the elaboration of the new proposal. Criteria on medical services were obtained as training scenarios, in which problems related to postgraduate activity were identified. The objective of the work is to expose a proposal of variables, indicators and evaluation criteria in the service as a scenario the specialist's formation. The proposal was considered the strategic guidelines, the target population and the different temporal and spatial areas identified, with which it intends to strengthen and develop postgraduate training in the Medical Sciences Universities in Cuba.

Impact of educational interventions on pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reaction reporting by resident doctors and faculty members: A prospective comparative study.

Purpose/Aim: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are significantly under-reported worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of educational interventions (EIs) on knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of hospital resident doctors and faculty members and compare ADR reporting in EI (medical specialties) vs. non-EI (surgical specialties) in these two cadres of doctors. Materials and Methods: This study was a prospective comparative study conducted in two groups (EI and non-EI) in resident doctors and faculty members working at a tertiary care hospital. EI group (medical specialties) were provided with EI to increase awareness about ADR reporting, whereas in non-EI group (surgical specialties), no EI was provided and they served as control. Respondents were asked to fill a pretest questionnaire followed by interactive EI in EI group and posttest questionnaire in both groups. The impact of EI among respondents was evaluated by their response to questionnaire and number of ADRs reported after intervention. Results: Total (n = 202) respondents were enrolled in the study. The number of resident doctors and faculty members in each group were (n = 101 [50%]). Overall, (n = 100 [49.5%]) were from the medical and (n = 102 [50.5%]) from surgical specialty. Post-EI period, there was statistically significant improvement in KAP domains. Conclusion: Our study serves as credible evidence that through EI; statistically significant improvement in KAP of resident doctors and faculty members in both medical and surgical specialties toward ADR reporting and existing pharmacovigilance system can be achieved.

Propuesta de competencias profesionales específicas para la formación de los especialistas en gastroenterología / A proposal of specific professional competences for the training of gastroenterology specialists

Introducción: La formación con calidad del capital humano en el sector salud constituye un reto para la educación médica cubana contemporánea. La formación académica, en particular la especialidad, tiene el cometido de formar un profesional con alta competencia y avanzadas capacidades para el desempeño especializado, solidez de los principios ético-morales y elevada calificación científico-técnica, por lo que el desarrollo de competencias profesionales resulta una prioridad para la formación de los especialistas biomédicos. Objetivo: Elaborar una propuesta de competencias profesionales específicas para la formación de los especialistas en gastroenterología. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio educacional, de investigación aplicativa, bajo el enfoque general dialéctico-materialista, con fundamento en teorías y enfoques filosóficos, psicológicos y legales de las leyes de la educación, y de la educación médica en particular. Asimismo, se utilizaron métodos teóricos, empíricos y estadístico-matemáticos. Resultados: Se elaboró una definición operativa de competencias profesionales específicas en gastroenterología, a partir del estudio del sistema de competencias y de la sistematización de los documentos rectores en dicha formación. También se identificaron y definieron las competencias profesionales específicas en las áreas asistencial, docente, investigativa y de dirección, que posibilitaron la mejora en el desempeño profesional de los futuros especialistas. Conclusiones: La formación basada en el desarrollo de competencias profesionales específicas constituye una prioridad para la educación médica y la salud pública cubana contemporánea, en aras de elevar la calidad del proceso formativo en la especialidad de gastroenterología y la atención médica que brindan estos galenos en los niveles de atención en salud(AU)

Introduction: The quality training of human capital in the health sector is a challenge for contemporary Cuban medical education. Academic training, particularly the residence, has the task of training a professional with high competence and advanced capabilities for specialized performance, solid ethical-moral principles and high scientific-technical qualification; therefore, the development of professional competences is a priority for the training of biomedical specialists. Objective: To elaborate a proposal of specific professional competences for the training of gastroenterology specialists. Methods: An educational study of applicative research was carried out under the general dialectical-materialistic approach and based on philosophical, psychological and legal theories and approaches of the laws of education and, particularly, of medical education. Theoretical, empirical and statistical-mathematical methods were also used. Results: An operational definition of specific professional competences in gastroenterology was elaborated, based on the study of the system of competences and the systematization of the guiding documents for such training. Specific professional competences were also identified and defined in the care, teaching, research and management areas, which allowed to improve the professional performance of future specialists. Conclusions: Training based on the development of specific professional competences is a priority for contemporary Cuban public health and medical education, in view of raising the quality of the training process in the specialty of gastroenterology and the medical care provided by these physicians at the levels of healthcare(AU)

Specialty Gender Composition and Prevalence of Physician Harassment.

Background: Women physicians remain a minority in most medical specialties and are at higher risk of workplace harassment than men. This research examines the relationship between a medical specialty's gender composition and physicians' workplace harassment experience. Materials and Methods: We used the Association of American Medical Colleges' National Sample Survey of Physicians 2019 (n = 6000). Participants self-reported harassment experiences in the 12 months preceding the survey, including threats of physical harm, physical harm, offensive and sexist remarks, and unwanted sexual advances from patients and coworkers. We used data from the American Medical Association to determine medical specialties' gender composition. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the relationship between harassment experiences and specialty gender composition. Results: Women and men physicians reported threats and harm at similar rates. However, women reported offensive, sexist remarks and unwanted sexual advances more frequently. We found greater representation of women within a specialty is associated with a lower prevalence of harassment experienced by men and women physicians (e.g., threats of physical harm, odds ratio [OR] = 0.973 [women] and 0.984 [men], and unwanted sexual advances, OR = 0.976 [women] and 0.981 [men]). Also, as women's representation in a specialty increases, the gender gap in experiences of most types of harassment decreases. Conclusions: Greater representation of women within a medical specialty is associated with a safer environment for both men and women physicians and narrower gender gaps in harassment experience. Our findings support efforts to increase gender diversity across the specialties and illuminate the dire need for antiharassment solutions in specialties with low women's representation.

Intenções de graduandos de Medicina em face dos preditores de fixação: Programa Mais Médicos na Bahia / Medicine graduates intentions in the face of establishment predictors: Bahia's Mais Médicos Program

Resumo: Introdução: O déficit quantitativo e as desigualdades na distribuição de médicos agravam a crise global da força de trabalho em saúde. Muitas políticas têm sido adotadas para enfrentamento do problema, destacando-se pela sua abrangência o Programa Mais Médicos. Objetivo: Este estudo objetivou caracterizar, entre graduandos de Medicina do estado da Bahia, as intenções de especialidade médica futura e de fixação em áreas prioritárias definidas pelo Programa Mais Médicos, conforme os preditores apontados na literatura. Método: Trata-se de um estudo de corte transversal com caráter exploratório, realizado com estudantes dos cursos de Medicina de quatro universidades federais da Bahia. Resultado: Predominaram estudantes de 20 a 24 anos, com perfil socioeconômico mais baixo em relação aos estudos anteriores, naturais dos pequenos e médios municípios baianos, que afirmaram, em sua maioria, a opção pela residência médica em especialidades de outras áreas, que não as áreas básicas, após a graduação. Verificou-se uma disparidade entre o percentual de estudantes com intenção de trabalhar na atenção primária à saúde e aqueles que desejaram especialidades básicas, sendo ainda consideravelmente menor a opção pela medicina de família e comunidade. As estudantes do sexo feminino predominaram de modo evidente entre aqueles que desejaram as especialidades de áreas básicas e que vislumbraram um futuro trabalho na atenção primária à saúde, nesse estado. De modo contrário, os estudantes do sexo masculino escolheram, na sua maioria, especialidades de outras áreas, especialmente aqueles que tiveram os aspectos financeiros como motivação principal para escolha de carreira. Conclusão: O estudo acrescentou conhecimento ao corpo de literatura sobre as mudanças na formação médica no país e os efeitos de políticas indutoras de um perfil profissional generalista que atenda às necessidades sociais da população.

Abstract: Introduction: The quantitative deficit and inequalities in the distribution of doctors exacerbate the global health workforce crisis. Many policies have been adopted to face the problem, with the 'Mais Médicos' Program standing out due to its scope. Objective: This study aimed to characterize, among undergraduate medical students in the state of Bahia, the intentions of future medical specialty and professional retention in priority areas defined by the More Doctors Program (PMM), according to the predictors indicated in the literature. Methods: This is a cross-sectional exploratory study conducted with medical students from four federal universities in the state of Bahia. Results: The study predominantly included students aged 20 to 24 years, with a lower socioeconomic profile in relation to previous studies, born in small and medium-sized municipalities in the state of Bahia, who mostly stated their option for medical residency in specialties other than the basic areas after graduation. An inequality was observed between the percentage of students who intended to work in Primary Care and those who wanted basic specialties, with the option for Family and Community Medicine being even lower. Female students clearly predominated among those who desired basic specialties and who envisioned a future employment in Primary Care in this state. Conversely, male students mostly chose specialties in other areas, especially those who had financial aspects as the main motivation for career choice. Final considerations: The study added knowledge to the body of literature on changes in medical training in the country and the effects of policies leading to a generalist professional profile that meets the social needs of the population.

Modelo de atención integral en el segundo nivel: Experiencia de la Unidad de Especialidades Médicas / Care models at the second level: Experience of the Medical Specialties Unit

Resumen Objetivo: Reportar la implementación y los beneficios del Modelo de atención integral en el segundo nivel: Experiencia de la Unidad de Especialidades Médicas, su utilidad en el manejo y seguimiento de los pacientes con enfermedades crónicas. Material y métodos: Se lograron implementar 9 consultorios de atención médica de la siguiente forma, 2 de Endocrinología, 3 consultorios de Clínica de Enfermedades Crónicas, uno de educación en diabetes e hipertensión, así como 3 de apoyo nutricional. Se midió valores absolutos del número de consultas durante los años 2017, 2018, 2019 y parte del 2020. Así mismo se buscó identificar las patologías más prevalentes con la idea en tener un mejor control y seguimiento de los pacientes, con una mejor organización de personal de atención médico y de enfermería. Resultados y discusión: Se lograron incrementar los números de consulta, con un control y seguimiento más estricto de los pacientes, además de los beneficios en cuanto a la formación y capacitación de médicos residentes, generales tanto militares como profesionales de la salud civiles para enfrentar estos padecimientos prevalentes en nuestro país.

Abstract Objective: To report the implementation as well as the benefits of the Comprehensive Care Model at the second level: Experience of the Medical Specialties Unit, and assess its usefulness in the management and monitoring of patients with chronic diseases. Material and methods: 9 medical care clinics were implemented as follows, 2 for Endocrinology, 3 Clinics for Chronic Diseases, one for education in diabetes and hypertension, as well as 3 for nutritional support. Absolute values of the number of consultations were measured during the years 2017, 2018, 2019 and part of 2020. Likewise, it was sought to identify the most prevalent pathologies with the idea of having a better control and monitoring of patients, with a better organization of medical and nursing care personnel. Results and discussion: It was possible to increase the consultation numbers, with a stricter control and monitoring of patients, in addition to the benefits in terms of training and training of resident doctors, both military generals and civilian health professionals to face these prevalent conditions in our country.

Using the Residency Matched Method and Intent to Practice Method to Estimate Primary Care Workforce Production.

Introduction: Many medical schools overestimate the percentage of their graduates who enter the primary care workforce based on the "first-certificate" residency their graduates enter. To rectify this problem, Deutchman and colleagues proposed a new method of estimation. The objective of this study was to compare results from the traditional residency match and Deutchman methods to the actual percentage of University of Kansas School of Medicine (KUSM) graduates who practice primary care after completing medical school and all residency and subspeciality fellowship training. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using a convenience sample of KUSM graduates from 2003-2014. Percentages of graduates classified as primary care by the traditional Residency Match Primary Care Method (RMPCM) and the percentages of graduates identified as primary care by Deutchman's Intent to Practice Primary Care Method (IPPCM) were compared with the actual percentage of graduates who eventually entered the primary care workforce. Results: Of the 1,944 KUSM graduates identified during the study period, the RMPCM predicted a 48.1% primary care output rate. The Deutchman's IPPCM predicted a 22.8% primary care output rate. The actual known percentage of graduates practicing primary care was 34.2%. Conclusions: Neither the RMPCM nor the Deutchman's IPPCM performed well in predicting the percentage or number of KUSM graduates who eventually practiced primary care. Due to predictions for the shortage of primary care physicians, there is a need to identify a method that more accurately predicts the medical schools' contribution to the primary care workforce.

Valoraciones sobre el procesamiento de información en investigaciones asociadas a especialidades médicas / Assessments on the processing of information in research associated with medical specialties

RESUMEN El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo valorar las regularidades de los principales problemas que se evidencian en el uso y empleo de la dinámica del procesamiento de la información en investigaciones asociadas a especialidades médicas, a partir de una selección de tesis vinculadas a la especialidad de Medicina General Integral y de otras especialidades médicas defendidas en los últimos 5 años en la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Camagüey. Los principales resultados de la revisión documental se centran en deficiencias en la presentación e interpretación de la naturaleza de las relaciones entre las variables del diseño metodológico y las técnicas estadísticas que se utilizan desde el diseño, ejecución y presentación del resultado científico.

SUMMARY The present work aims to assess the regularities of the main problems that are evidenced in the use and employment of the dynamics of information processing in research associated with medical specialties, from a selection of theses linked to the specialty of Comprehensive General Medicine and other medical specialties defended in the last 5 years at the University of Medical Sciences of Camagüey. The main results of the documentary review focus on deficiencies in the presentation and interpretation of the nature of the relationships between the variables of the methodological design and the statistical techniques that are used from the design, execution and presentation of the scientific result.

Development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (MMSCCQ) - a methodological study.

INTRODUCTION: A validated instrument to assess the motivating factors influencing junior doctors' medical specialist career choices is not available. The Motivators for Medical Specialist Career Choice Questionnaire (MMSCCQ) was developed and validated in the present study. METHODS: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods study was conducted among house officers (HO) of a tertiary care hospital. A literature review was used to construct an interview guide. Seven HOs participated in an online, one-on-one audio-recorded in-depth interview (IDI). Seven sub-themes and 33 codes identified by thematic analyses were used to develop the MMSCCQ. The importance of each motivator was rated on a five-point Likert scale. The MMSCCQ was pretested, and a random sample of 262 house officers was invited to participate in an online survey. Psychometric evaluation was done using reliability statistics, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. RESULTS: The seven main themes identified by thematic analyses were labeled as factors related to 'work schedule and personal life,' 'training opportunities', 'past work experiences', 'specialty characteristics', 'career prospects', 'patient care characteristics', and 'social factors.' The highest ratings were given to "previous job experience" and "patient care traits. "The response rate was 71%, the mean age of the 185 HOs was 26.7 years (SD = 1.6). Females made up 63.8% of the population. The internal consistency for the overall questionnaire measured by Cronbach's alpha was 0.85. Each construct demonstrated an acceptable internal consistency. Twenty-six of 33 items were maintained after an exploratory factor analysis was conducted, yielding 7 constructs with a 64.9% variance. Confirmatory factor analyses established the construct validity. CONCLUSION: The MMSCCQ has acceptable reliability and construct validity. Further studies are needed to test psychometric properties in different settings.