Efectividad del programa de mantenimiento con opioides para el tratamiento de su dependencia, en prisión / Effectiveness of opioid maintenance programs for treating drug dependence in prisons

Objetivos: Evaluar la efectividad del programa de mantenimiento con opioides en el tratamiento de su dependencia en prisiones españolas. Material y método: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica narrativa en las siguientes bases de datos: PubMed, Cochrane, IBECS, LILACS y HealthCare. Se eligieron preferentemente todos aquellos ensayos clínicos, así como artículos de revisión sistemática y algún artículo que se consideró relevante por su contenido. El periodo de tiempo se limitó entre enero de 2011 y noviembre de 2021. El idioma de búsqueda fue: inglés, español y catalán. Se rechazaron los artículos repetidos y los que no tuvieron relación con los objetivos. Los criterios de búsqueda fueron: methadone AND prisons; opiate substitution treatment AND prisons; methadone AND buprenorphine; methadone OR buprenorphine; prisons AND Methadone AND buprenorphine. Resultados: Fueron seleccionados 20 artículos de 647 consultados, tras la aplicación de los filtros correspondientes y tras descartar los artículos duplicados. Discusión: Se evidenció una ligera mayor efectividad de la buprenorfina frente a la metadona. Se destacó una elevada prevalencia del programa, así como variedad de efectos adversos de la metadona. Su utilidad sobre el comportamiento obtiene disparidad de opiniones. Se anuncia la posibilidad de nuevas alternativas de tratamiento con un mejor control farmacológico. (AU)

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of opioid maintenance programs in treating opioid dependence in Spanish prisons. Material and method: A narrative bibliographic review was carried out on the following databases: PubMed; Cochrane; IBECS; LILACS; HealthCare. All clinical trials were chosen as a preference, along with systematic review articles and some articles that were considered relevant for their content. The time period was limited to between January 2011 and November 2021. The languages chosen were English, Spanish and Catalan. Repeated articles and those that were not related to the objectives were rejected. The search criteria were: “methadone AND prisons”; “opiate substitution treatment AND prisons”; “methadone AND buprenorphine”; “methadone OR buprenorphine”; “prisons AND Methadone AND buprenorphine”. Results: 20 articles were selected out of 647 items consulted after applying the corresponding filters and after discarding duplicates. Discussion: There was a slightly greater effectiveness of buprenorphine versus methadone. The high prevalence of the program was highlighted, as well as the variety of adverse effects of methadone. Usefulness with regard to inmates’ behavior showed a range of opinions. The possibility of new treatment alternatives with better pharmacological control is mentioned. (AU)

Flexibilidad en las pautas take home de metadona en los CAD de Madrid Salud durante la pandemia de Covid-19 / Flexibility in the methadone take home guidelines in the CAD of Madrid Salud during the Covid-19 pandemic

El objetivo del estudio fue examinar qué cambios se realizaron en los horarios de dispensación y las pautas take home de metadona solución oral y comprimidos, en los siete Centros de Atención a las Adicciones (CAD) de Madrid Salud, a raíz del estado de emergencia y a lo largo de un año posterior a su entrada. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo longitudinal, obteniendo los datos de la revisión de los informes elaborados por la unidad de farmacia, encargada del suministro y control de la metadona, en tres momentos: febrero de 2020 y marzo de 2021, para las pautas de metadona quincenal; y además en noviembre de 2020 para las de tratamiento con metasedín. Se realizó un análisis de estadística descriptiva, calculándose frecuencias absolutas y relativas, así como el porcentaje de variación entre el primer momento y el último momento de medición. En todos los centros se redujeron los días de dispensación. Las pautas quincenales take home de solución de metadona aumentaron más del 50% en todos los centros, manteniéndose un año después un incremento total del 97%. Las personas en tratamiento de mantenimiento con Metasedín se incrementaron en un 45,3%. Las restricciones de movilidad debido al confinamiento por Covid-19 obligaron a flexibilizar y ampliar el take home. La buena respuesta de las personas en tratamiento ha favorecido el mantenimiento de los cambios, lo que ayuda a la normalización de un tratamiento estigmatizado. (AU)

The objective of the study was to examine the changes made in the dispensing schedules and oral solution methadone take home doses and tablets, in the seven Addiction Care Centers (CAD) of Madrid Salud, because of the state of emergency, and which ones remain one year later. A longitudinal descriptive study was conducted, obtaining the data from the review of the reports prepared by the pharmacy unit, responsible for supply and control of methadone, at three times: February 2020 and March 2021, for the two weeks methadone doses; in addition, people treated with Metasedín were included in November 2020. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed, calculating absolute and relative frequencies, as well as the percentage of variation between the first moment and the last moment of measurement. Dispensing days were reduced in all centers. Two weeks methadone solution take home doses increased by more than 50% in all centers, maintaining a total increase of 97% one year later. People in Metasedín maintenance treatment increased by 45.3%. Mobility restrictions due to confinement by Covid-19 forced to make more flexible and expand the take home. The good response of people in treatment has favored maintaining the changes, which helps to normalize a stigmatized treatment. (AU)

Revisión sistemática sobre el manejo clínico del dolor crónico y el trastorno por uso de opioides simultáneo / Systematic review on the clinical management of chronic pain and comorbid opioid use disorder

La crisis causada por los opioides recetados y sus efectos secundarios relacionados son un problema de salud pública en todo el mundo. La mayoría de estos medicamentos se recetan para el afrontamiento del dolor crónico. La coexistencia del trastorno por uso de opioides (TUO)en pacientes con dolor crónico representa un desafío complejo debido ala necesidad de controlar tanto el dolor como el TUO. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática es evaluar la eficacia de los tratamientos posibles para dicha población con TUO y dolor crónico. Se ha realizado una revisión sistemática usando las bases de datos Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO y ClinicalTrials.gov, conforme a las pautas PRISMA. Los artículos elegibles abordaron los resultados en pacientes con dolor crónico y diagnóstico comórbido de TUO, después de aplicar una intervención. De593 artículos identificados, nueve eran elegibles para la revisión cualitativa(n = 7 intervenciones farmacológicas; n = 2 intervenciones psicológicas). Lametadona, la buprenorfina, la terapia cognitivo-conductual y el mindfulness mostraron resultados prometedores, pero los datos no eran concluyentes (<2ECA con bajo riesgo de sesgo). No está claro si el tratamiento con agonistas opioides debe mantenerse o disminuirse y qué fármaco debe prescribirse para la terapia de sustitución de opioides (metadona o buprenorfina/naloxona). El mindfulness y la terapia cognitivo-conductual tienen un efecto discreto en la mejora del afecto negativo, pero no del dolor. El enfoque terapéutico podría individualizarse sobre la base de una toma de decisiones conjunta. (AU)

The crisis caused by prescribed opioids and their related side effects area public health problem worldwide. Most of these are prescribed forcoping with chronic pain. The coexistence of opioid use disorder (OUD)in patients with chronic pain represents a complex challenge due tothe need for managing both pain and OUD. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of feasible treatments for this population with OUD and comorbid chronic pain for both conditions. A systematic database search has been performed using Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and ClinicalTrials.gov in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. Eligible articles addressed the outcomes in chronic pain patients with comorbid opioid use disorder after treatment interventions were applied. Of 593 identified articles, nine were eligible for qualitative review (n = 7pharmacological interventions; n = 2 psychological interventions). Methadone, buprenorphine, cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness showed promising results, but data were inconclusive (<2 RCT with low risk of bias). It is unclear whether the opioid agonist treatment should be maintained ortapered and which drug should be prescribed for the opioid substitution therapy (methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone). Mindfulness andcognitive behavioral therapy have a discrete effect on improving negativeaffect but not pain. The therapeutic approach might be individualized under a shared decision-making basis. (AU)

Estudio de seguimiento de 35 años de pacientes admitidos a tratamiento con metadona entre 1982-1984 en Asturias, España / A 35-year follow-up study of patients admitted to methadone treatment between 1982-1984 in Asturias, Spain

El objetivo fue evaluar el estado de una población dependiente a la heroína 35 años después de su primera inscripción en un tratamiento de mantenimiento con metadona (TMM). Se utilizó un protocolo ad hoc para evaluar morbilidad, consumo y tratamiento de la adicción en la muestra de supervivientes. Se calculó la razón de mortalidad estandarizada (RME) con un intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95%. Un total de 214 pacientes ingresaron en TMM entre 1982 y 1984 en el Servicio de Salud Pública de Asturias. Se recibió información sobre 195 sujetos, de los cuales 146 habían fallecido. Los hombres representaron el 77,5% de la cohorte del estudio. Durante el período de seguimiento de 35 años, la RME fue de 11,75 (IC 95% = 9,95 – 13,77). En la muestra de supervivientes, el 5,7% todavía estaba inscrito en TMM; el virus de inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) se diagnosticó en un 38,77% y la hepatitis B/C en un 73,46%; el consumo actual de heroína se informó en un 4,1%. No hubo diferencias de género en la mortalidad o la condición de VIH y hepatitis B/C. Ninguna de las mujeres consumía heroína en el seguimiento de 35 años en comparación con el 5,26% de los hombres. En conclusión, nuestro estudio confirma la alta tasa de mortalidad a largo plazo, incluso después de la inscripción en TMM. (AU)

The objective was to evaluate outcomes in a heroin-dependent population 35 years after first enrolment in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). An ad hoc protocol was used to assess drug misuse, treatment, and drug-related morbidity in the survivor sample. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. A total of 214 heroin-dependent patients entered MMT between 1982 and 1984 in the Asturias Public Health Service. Information was received on 195 subjects, of whom 146 were deceased. Men accounted for 77.5% of the study cohort. Over the 35-year follow-up period, the SMR was 11.75 (95% CI = 9.95 – 13.77). In the survivor sample, 5.7% were still enrolled in MMT; human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was diagnosed in 38.77% and hepatitis B/C in 73.46%. No differences were found between sexes in mortality or HIV and hepatitis B/C status. None of the female survivors were using heroin at the 35-year follow-up compared with 5.26% of males. In conclusion, our study confirms the high long-term mortality rate of heroin addicts, even after enrollment in MMT. (AU)

Satisfacción y experiencia de pacientes en tratamiento con sustitutivos opioides en España. Estudio PREDEPO / Patients’satisfaction and experience in treatment with opioid substitution therapy in Spain. The PREDEPO study

El objetivo es comparar la satisfacción, experiencia, objetivos y opinión de los pacientes con trastorno por consumo de opioides (TCO) en base a su tratamiento sustitutivo de opioides (TSO) actual (metadona o buprenorfina/naloxona (B/N)). El estudio PREDEPO es un estudio observacional, transversal, multicéntrico desarrollado en España que incluyó pacientes adultos, diagnosticados de TCO y en TSO, quienes contestaron una encuesta sobre su tratamiento actual. Se incluyeron 98 pacientes (B/N:50%, metadona:50%): edad media de 47 ± 8 años y el 80% varones. A nivel de la satisfacción con su tratamiento, los resultados fueron similares entre grupos. El factor “muy/bastante satisfactorio” que se reportó con mayor frecuencia fue “poder repartir las dosis en varios momentos del día” (44% B/N vs. 63% metadona; p = ,122). Se encontraron diferencias significativas en “tener que recoger la medicación diariamente” donde una menor proporción en el grupo B/N contestaron “muy/bastante molesto” versus el grupo metadona (19% vs. 52%, p = ,032). Los objetivos reportados por la mayoría de los pacientes fueron similares entre grupos (“no sentir más síndrome de abstinencia”, “disminuir o dejar definitivamente mi consumo de drogas”, “mejorar mi estado de salud” y “dejar de pensar en consumir todos los días”) excepto en “no tener más problemas de dinero” (72% B/N vs. 92% metadona; p = ,012). Estos resultados evidencian que existen expectativas no cubiertas con los TSO actuales y la necesidad de nuevos tratamientos que disminuyan la carga de la enfermedad, eviten la necesidad de una dosificación diaria y reduzcan el estigma, mejorando así el manejo del paciente, su adherencia y calidad de vida. (AU)

The aim of this study was to compare patients’ satisfaction, experience, objectives, and opinion based on their current opioid substitution therapy (OST) (buprenorphine/naloxone (B/N) or methadone). The PREDEPO study is an observational, cross-sectional, multicentric study performed in Spain. Adult patients diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving OST were included. They were asked to fill in a questionnaire regarding their current OST. A total of 98 patients were enrolled (B/N: 50%, methadone: 50%). Mean age was 47 ± 8 years old and 80% were male. Treatment satisfaction was similar between groups. The most frequently reported factor for being “very/quite satisfied” was “being able to distribute the dose at different times throughout the day” (44% B/N vs. 63% methadone; p = .122). A significantly lower proportion of patients in the B/N group versus the methadone group reported that having to collect the medication daily was “very/quite annoying” (19% vs. 52%, p = .032). Treatment objectives reported by the majority of patients were similar between groups (“not feeling in withdrawal anymore”, “reduce/definitely stop drug use”, “improve my health”, and “stop thinking about using daily”) except for “not having money problems anymore” (73% B/N vs. 92% methadone; p = .012). These results suggest there are several unmet expectations regarding current OST. There is a need for new treatments that reduce the burden of OUD, avoid the need for daily dosing, and are less stigmatizing which in turn could improve patient management, adherence and, quality of life. (AU)

Aparición tardía de síndrome de piernas inquietas como síntoma de abstinencia a la metadona en pacientes oncológicos: reporte de dos casos / Late onset of restless legs syndrome as a methadone withdrawal symptom in cancer patients: report of two cases

El síndrome de piernas inquietas es una alteración del sueño frecuente, el cual involucra usualmente un deseo urgente de mover las piernas, asociado con una sensación displacentera y movimientos periódicos de las mismas durante el sueño. La fisiopatología de este síndrome ha sido ampliamente estudiada y aun no es completamente clara, entendiéndose en la actualidad que en el mismo influyen factores de la personalidad, genéticos y ambientales. En el presente escrito describimos 2 casos en los cuales la suspensión del tratamiento con metadona se consideró fuertemente asociada a la presentación de síndrome de piernas inquietas en pacientes sin diagnóstico previo del mismo.(AU)

Restless legs syndrome is a frequent sleep disturbance, which usually involves an urgent desire to move the legs, associated with an unpleasant sensation and periodic movements of the legs during sleep. Its pathophysiology has been widely studied and is still not completely clear, and it is currently understood that it is influenced by personality, genetic and environmental factors. In this paper we describe 2 cases in which the suspension of methadone treatment was considered strongly associated with the presentation of restless legs syndrome in patients without previous diagnosis of this syndrome.(AU)

The need for opioid in the postoperative analgesia of dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy due to intervertebral disc extrusion / A necessidade de opioide na analgesia pós-operatória de cães submetidos à hemilaminectomia devido à extrusão do disco intervertebral

The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative analgesic effect of protocols with and without the opioid methadone in dogs with intervertebral disc extrusion undergoing decompressive surgery. Sixteen paraplegic dogs with preserved nociception underwent hemilaminectomy/disc fenestration and were randomly assigned to two groups. The analgesic protocol consisted of methadone, meloxicam and dipyrone in Group I (G1), and meloxicam and dipyrone in Group II (G2). The animals were blindly assessed by two observers, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the short-form Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (CMPS-SF). Assessments occurred every 2 hours during first 24 hours post-surgery, and every 4 hours afterwards. There was no statistical difference among groups regarding pain scores or analgesic rescues. Both analgesic protocols provided analgesia in the initial 48 hours postoperatively, demonstrating that opioids are not necessary in the postoperative period of dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy and disc fenestration.(AU)

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a analgesia pós-operatória de protocolos com e sem o opioide metadona em cães com extrusão de disco intervertebral submetidos à descompressão cirúrgica. Dezesseis cães paraplégicos com presença de nocicepção foram submetidos à hemilaminectomia/fenestração de disco e distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos. No Grupo I (G1), o protocolo analgésico consistiu em metadona, meloxicam e dipirona e, no Grupo II (G2), por meloxicam e dipirona. Os pacientes foram avaliados de maneira cega por dois avaliadores, com base na escala visual analógica (EVA) e na escala simplificada composta de dor de Glasgow (CMPS-SF). As avaliações ocorreram a cada 2 horas durante as primeiras 24 horas de pós-operatório e, por mais 24 horas, a cada 4 horas. Não houve diferença estatística entre os grupos avaliados em relação à escores de dor e nem a necessidade de resgate analgésico. Ambos os protocolos promoveram analgesia nas 48 horas iniciais de pós-operatório, demonstrando não haver a necessidade do uso de opioide em cães submetidos à hemilaminectomia e fenestração de disco.(AU)

Revisión de metadona intraoperatoria para el manejo de dolor posquirúrgico / Intraoperative methadone for the management of postsurgical pain a review

Pain management associated with surgery is a constant concern of the health team as well as the patient. Multiple proposals for analgesia have been made in the perioperative context. The use of opioids with rapid effect and easy titration in the intraoperative period are currently frequent; to then perform a postoperative analgesic control with drugs with a longer half-life, usually achieving adequate pain management. However, sometimes the standard analgesic scheme is not enough. The problems associated with this situation have led to the need for high doses of opioids in the postoperative period, with the requirement for monitoring, health personnel, and the adverse effects that these involve. Methadone is a long-acting, rapid-onset opioid, the latter secondary to its long elimination half-life. It is presumed that these characteristics have led patients to report adequate pain management, which has been related to a decrease in the need and dose of rescue opioids, in addition to delaying the requirement of these if necessary during the postoperative. These properties allow methadone to be a potential solution to perioperative pain management.

El manejo del dolor asociado a la cirugía es una preocupación constante del equipo de salud al igual que del paciente. Se han planteado múltiples propuestas de analgesia en el contexto perioperatorio, siendo actualmente frecuente el uso de opioides de rápido efecto y fácil titulación en el intraoperatorio; para luego realizar un control analgésico postoperatorio con fármacos de mayor vida media, logrando habitualmente un manejo adecuado del dolor. Sin embargo, a veces el esquema analgésico estándar no es suficiente. La problemática asociada a esta situación ha llevado a la necesidad de altas dosis de opioides en el posoperatorio, con el requerimiento de monitorización, personal de salud y efectos adversos que estos involucran. La metadona es un opioide de inicio de acción rápido y larga duración, este último secundario a su vida media de eliminación prolongada. Se presume que estas características han logrado que los pacientes reporten un adecuado manejo de su dolor, lo que se ha relacionado a una disminución en la necesidad y dosis de opioides de rescate, además de retrasar el requerimiento de éstos en el caso de ser necesarios durante el postoperatorio. Estas propiedades permiten que la metadona pueda ser una potencial solución al manejo del dolor perioperatorio.

The need for opioid in the postoperative analgesia of dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy due to intervertebral disc extrusion

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative analgesic effect of protocols with and without the opioid methadone in dogs with intervertebral disc extrusion undergoing decompressive surgery. Sixteen paraplegic dogs with preserved nociception underwent hemilaminectomy/disc fenestration and were randomly assigned to two groups. The analgesic protocol consisted of methadone, meloxicam and dipyrone in Group I (G1), and meloxicam and dipyrone in Group II (G2). The animals were blindly assessed by two observers, using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the short-form Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (CMPS-SF). Assessments occurred every 2 hours during first 24 hours post-surgery, and every 4 hours afterwards. There was no statistical difference among groups regarding pain scores or analgesic rescues. Both analgesic protocols provided analgesia in the initial 48 hours postoperatively, demonstrating that opioids are not necessary in the postoperative period of dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy and disc fenestration.

RESUMO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a analgesia pós-operatória de protocolos com e sem o opioide metadona em cães com extrusão de disco intervertebral submetidos à descompressão cirúrgica. Dezesseis cães paraplégicos com presença de nocicepção foram submetidos à hemilaminectomia/fenestração de disco e distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos. No Grupo I (G1), o protocolo analgésico consistiu em metadona, meloxicam e dipirona e, no Grupo II (G2), por meloxicam e dipirona. Os pacientes foram avaliados de maneira cega por dois avaliadores, com base na escala visual analógica (EVA) e na escala simplificada composta de dor de Glasgow (CMPS-SF). As avaliações ocorreram a cada 2 horas durante as primeiras 24 horas de pós-operatório e, por mais 24 horas, a cada 4 horas. Não houve diferença estatística entre os grupos avaliados em relação à escores de dor e nem a necessidade de resgate analgésico. Ambos os protocolos promoveram analgesia nas 48 horas iniciais de pós-operatório, demonstrando não haver a necessidade do uso de opioide em cães submetidos à hemilaminectomia e fenestração de disco.

Psychosocial reintegration process in patients who receive maintenance treatment with methadone: A qualitative analysis / Proceso de reintegración psicosocial en pacientes que reciben tratamiento de mantenimiento con metadona: un análisis cualitativo

Abstract Introduction The evaluation of methadone maintenance programs reports generally positive outcomes. Objective To explore the psychosocial factors that contribute to achieve treatment goals even when patients live in conditions of precariousness and exclusion. Method Qualitative study of multiple cases, with a sample of 12 interviews with patients participating in a maintenance and detoxification program with methadone; a thematic and discursive-narrative analysis was undertaken. Results We identified the predominance of a typical discursive scheme composed of clearly differentiated narrative segments: previous conditions, establishment of a relationship with the therapeutic system, process of adjustment as a part of treatment and social reintegration. Two main themes were also identified: addiction and dealing with substances, and the problem of normative integration; there was also an experience of acceptance and recognition that constitutes a central factor for treatment. Discussion and conclusion These findings are discussed in light of the disaffiliated conditions of people using injected heroin and the need to consider psychosocial and normative adjustment as a relevant factor for treatment and social reintegration, which leads to the suggestion to include psychotherapeutic interventions to accompany and reinforce the process.

Resumen Introducción La evaluación de los programas de mantenimiento con metadona reporta, en general, resultados positivos. Objetivo Explorar factores psicosociales que contribuyan al logro de los objetivos del tratamiento, incluso cuando los pacientes se encuentran en condiciones de precariedad y exclusión. Método Estudio cualitativo de casos múltiples, con una muestra de 12 entrevistas con pacientes participantes en un programa de mantenimiento y deshabituación con metadona; se realizó un análisis discursivo-narrativo y temático. Resultados Identificamos el predominio de un esquema discursivo típico compuesto de segmentos narrativos claramente diferenciados: condiciones previas, vinculación con el sistema terapéutico, proceso de ajuste al interior del tratamiento y proceso de reintegración social. También se identificaron dos ejes de articulación temática: la adicción y el manejo de sustancias, y el problema de la integración normativa; hubo además una experiencia de aceptación y reconocimiento que constituye un factor central en el tratamiento. Discusión y conclusión Estos hallazgos se discuten a la luz de las condiciones de desafiliación del usuario de heroína y de la necesidad de considerar el ajuste psicosocial y normativo como un factor relevante para el tratamiento y la reintegración social, lo que lleva a sugerir que los programas incluyan componentes psicoterapéuticos con el objeto de acompañar y reforzar efectivamente el proceso.

Enfrentando el problema emergente de consumo de heroína en Colombia: los nuevos programas de tratamiento asistido con metadona / Facing the Growing Heroin Problem in Colombia: The New Methadone-assisted Treatment Programs

RESUMEN Objetivo: Colombia está enfrentado una epidemia emergente del consumo endovenoso de heroína. Un conocimiento de los programas existentes que ofrecen tratamiento asistido con metadona en el país es necesario para que se puedan proponer estrategias de mejoría. Métodos: Se encuestaron 13 programas de regiones prioritarias. Se evaluaron las caracte rísticas demográficas y clínicas de los usuarios, así como los servicios ofrecidos por estos programas, sus protocolos de tratamiento con metadona y las diferencias en las barreras al tratamiento y las causas de abandono del tratamiento. Resultados: Se analizaron 12/13 cuestionarios, con un total de 538 pacientes activos. La mayo ría de los pacientes eran varones (85,5%) de 18 a 34 arios (70%). El 40% eran usuarios de drogas intravenosas y el 25% admitió compartir agujas. Entre las comorbilidades asociadas con el consumo de heroína se encontró la enfermedad mental (48%), la hepatitis C (8,7%) y la infección por el VIH (2%). La comorbilidad psiquiátrica se asocia más con los pacientes que acuden al sector privado (el 69,8 frente al 29,7%; p < 0,03). La media de la dosis inicial de metadona es 25,3 ± 8,9mg/día y las dosis de mantenimiento van de 41 a 80 mg/día. La falta de articulación con atención primaria fue una barrera más sentida que los problemas con la cobertura del seguro médico y los prejuicios del tratamiento con metadona (p < 0,05). También, los problemas administrativos y de la aseguradora (p < 0,003), la falta de sumi nistro de metadona (p < 0,018) y la recaída en el consumo (p < 0,014) son las razones más significativas de abandono del tratamiento. Conclusiones: Estos programas tienen diferentes niveles de desarrollo e implementación en los protocolos de tratamiento. Algunas de las barreras de acceso y de las causas de abandono del tratamiento pueden mitigarse mejorando la administración de salud.

ABSTRACT Objective: Colombia is facing a rising epidemic of intravenous heroin use. Knowledge of the methadone-assisted treatment programs in the country is crucial in order to propose improvement strategies. Methods: 13 programmes from priority regions were surveyed. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients attending the programs, a description of the services offered, their methadone treatment protocols, the various barriers to treatment and the causes of treatment abandonment were reviewed. Results: 12/13 questionnaires were analysed with a total of 538 active patients. Most of the patients attending these programs were men (85.5%) between 18 and 34 years-old (70%). Forty percent (40%) were intravenous drug users and 25% admitted sharing needles. The comorbidities associated with heroin use were mental illness (48%), hepatitis C (8.7%) and HIV (2%). Psychiatric comorbidity was more likely in patients attending the private sec tor (69.8% vs 29.7%; p < 0.03). The initial average dose of methadone administered was 25.3 ± 8.9mg/day, with a maintenance dose ranging from 41 to 80mg/day. Lack of align ment with primary care was perceived to be the most serious barrier to access, ahead of problems with insurance and prejudice towards treatment with methadone (p < 0.05). Health Administration and insurance problems (p < 0.003), together with the lack of availa bility of methadone (p < 0.018) and relapse (p < 0.014) were the most important reasons for abandonment of treatment. Conclusions: The treatment protocols of these programmes offer different levels of develop ment and implementation. Some of the barriers to access and reasons for abandonment of treatment with methadone can be mitigated with better health administration.

Facing the Growing Heroin Problem in Colombia: The New Methadone-assisted Treatment Programs. / Enfrentando el problema emergente de consumo de heroína en Colombia: los nuevos programas de tratamiento asistido con metadona.

OBJECTIVE: Colombia is facing a rising epidemic of intravenous heroin use. Knowledge of the methadone-assisted treatment programs in the country is crucial in order to propose improvement strategies. METHODS: 13 programmes from priority regions were surveyed. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients attending the programs, a description of the services offered, their methadone treatment protocols, the various barriers to treatment and the causes of treatment abandonment were reviewed. RESULTS: 12/13 questionnaires were analysed with a total of 538 active patients. Most of the patients attending these programs were men (85.5%) between 18 and 34 years-old (70%). Forty percent (40%) were intravenous drug users and 25% admitted sharing needles. The comorbidities associated with heroin use were mental illness (48%), hepatitis C (8.7%) and HIV (2%). Psychiatric comorbidity was more likely in patients attending the private sector (69.8% vs 29.7%; p<0.03). The initial average dose of methadone administered was 25.3±8.9mg/day, with a maintenance dose ranging from 41 to 80mg/day. Lack of alignment with primary care was perceived to be the most serious barrier to access, ahead of problems with insurance and prejudice towards treatment with methadone (p<0.05). Health Administration and insurance problems (p<0.003), together with the lack of availability of methadone (p<0.018) and relapse (p<0.014) were the most important reasons for abandonment of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment protocols of these programmes offer different levels of development and implementation. Some of the barriers to access and reasons for abandonment of treatment with methadone can be mitigated with better health administration.

Efeitos adversos da morfina, metadona e tramadol no pós-operatório de cães submetidos à cirurgia da coluna vertebral: 180 casos (2011-2016) / Adverse effects of morphine, methadone and tramadol in the postoperative period of dogs undergone vertebral surgery: 180 cases (2011-2016)

A dor pós-operatória em cães que são submetidos a cirurgias da coluna vertebral é considerada severa e seu manejo inadequado pode influenciar no tempo de recuperação do paciente, na qualidade de vida e no resultado cirúrgico. Dentre os analgésicos indicados para uso no pós-operatório dessas cirurgias tem-se os opioides, que podem apresentar inúmeros efeitos adversos que requerem atenção. Devido à escassez de estudos clínicos acerca desse assunto em se tratando do pós-operatório de cães, objetivou-se com o presente estudo retrospectivo apresentar os efeitos adversos da morfina, metadona e tramadol utilizados no pós-operatório de cirurgias da coluna vertebral. Foram revisadas e avaliadas as fichas de 180 cães e anotadas as alterações observadas no pós-operatório e decorrentes do uso de opioides. Os principais efeitos adversos observados foram anorexia, hiporexia, vômito, salivação, vocalização, bradicardia, hipotermia, ofegação e sedação. Também foi observada persistência da dor em alguns cães mesmo com o uso de analgésicos. Houve diferença na ocorrência de anorexia nos cães tratados com morfina e nos tratados com metadona em relação aos tratados com tramadol. Ocorreu diferença também entre a observação de dor dos grupos morfina e tramadol. A associação de dipirona com morfina e com metadona não revelou diferença com relação à ocorrência de efeitos adversos, bem como a variação de doses. Conclui-se que a morfina, a metadona e o tramadol apresentam efeitos adversos quando empregados para tratamento da dor pós-operatória em cães submetidos à cirurgia da coluna vertebral; a anorexia, a hiporexia e o vômito foram os efeitos adversos frequentes com o uso de morfina e de metadona e, mesmo que o tramadol apresente menor ocorrência desses efeitos, seu uso, na dose estudada, pode não ser vantajoso quando se leva em consideração o grau de dor para cirurgias da coluna vertebral.(AU)

Postoperative pain in dogs undergone vertebral surgery is classified as severe and it's important an adequate approach to it, because it can influence recovery time, quality of life and surgery outcome. Opioids are indicated for postoperative pain treatment in these surgeries. Opioids may have adverse effects that may require attention. There are few clinical studies that present the adverse effects of these analgesics in canine postoperative period. The aim of this retrospective study was to present the adverse effects of morphine, methadone and tramadol in canine vertebral surgery postoperative period. There were revised the postoperative records of 180 dogs and the changes resulted from the opioids use were noted. The adverse effects observed were anorexia, hyporexia, vomiting, vocalization, bradycardia, hypothermia, panting, sedation. Pain was also observed in some dogs. A significant difference was found in anorexia between dogs treated with morphine and tramadol and methadone and tramadol. Significant difference was also found in pain between dogs treated with morphine and tramadol. The association of metamizole and morphine or metamizole and methadone was not different in relation to the adverse effects. There was also no difference with the dosage variation and the adverse effects. In conclusion, morphine, methadone and tramadol have adverse effects when used for pain control in the postoperative period of dogs submitted to vertebral surgery. Anorexia, hypophagia and emesis were frequent the adverse effects observed with morphine and methadone and, despite tramadol presented less adverse effects, its use may be not beneficial in the studied doses when we consider the degree of pain, however more controlled studies with clinical situation are needed to confirm this.(AU)

Outpatient intravenous multimodal elastomeric pump with methadone in ambulatory surgery. / Analgesia multimodal domiciliaria con metadona en perfusión intravenosa mediante bomba elastomérica en cirugía mayor ambulatoria.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Analgesia in Ambulatory Surgery (AS) needs to evolve in parallel with surgical complexity. We designed a study to try to improve analgesia in painful surgery using an intravenous elastomeric pump. As a novelty, methadone was included. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational study, physical status ASA I-II, underwent ambulatory surgeries with moderate-severe postoperative pain. Analgesia was administered for 48h by an intravenous multimodal elastomeric pump (methadone, tramadol, dexketoprofen and ondansetron at low doses). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest and movement were evaluated at 24 and 48h. Andersen Scale, Lattinen Test, rescue analgesia and side-effects were recorded at 24h after surgery. RESULTS: We included 73 patients: 37% abdominal wall surgery, 30% hemorrhoidectomies and 33% perineal surgery. Median VAS score at rest and movement were 0 and 3 at 24h, and 0 and 2 at 48h. At 24h, Andersen's Scale score was ≤1 in 89%, and Lattinen Test ≤6 in 90% of patients. Rescue medication was administered in 30% of patients. Two patients had vomiting at 24 and 48h. Minor catheter and pump dysfunctions were observed in 8% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal analgesia with intravenous methadone administered by elastomeric perfusion at home is effective and safe. However, monitoring is needed to diagnosis dysfunction of devices.

Tratamiento opioide del dolor mixto en pacientes pediátricos asistidos por el equipo de Cuidados Paliativos: Cinco años de experiencia / Opioid treatment for mixed pain in pediatric patients assisted by the Palliative Care team: Five years of experience

Introducción: El dolor se define como una experiencia sensorial y emocional desagradable, relacionada con daño tisular actual o potencial. Según su mecanismo fisiopatológico, se clasifica en dolor nociceptivo, neuropático y mixto. Cuando su intensidad es de moderada a grave, se debe administrar un opioide potente, y la morfina es el fármaco de elección. Si resulta ineficaz o aparecen efectos adversos intolerables, se recomienda la rotación de opioide. Nuestro objetivo fue describir el tratamiento farmacológico del dolor mixto en los pacientes asistidos por el equipo de Cuidados Paliativos del Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde entre agosto de 2011 y septiembre de 2015. Se incluyeron 72 pacientes, con edad media de 10,1 años y la enfermedad de base más frecuente fue patología oncológica. El opioide de inicio fue morfina en 57 casos; 48 recibieron fármacos adyuvantes. La rotación de opioides ocurrió en la mitad de los casos y la más frecuente fue de morfina a metadona.

Pain is defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Depending on its pathophysiological mechanism, it may be classified into nociceptive, neuropathic, and mixed pain. If pain is moderate to severe, a strong opioid should be administered and, when this is the case, morphine is the drug of choice. If morphine is ineffective or causes intolerable adverse effects, opioid rotation is recommended. Our objective was to describe the drug management for mixed pain used in patients assisted by the Palliative Care team of Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde between August 2011 and September 2015. A total of 72 patients were included. Their mean age was 10.1 years, and the most common underlying disease was cancer. The initial opioid was morphine in 57 cases; 48 patients received adjuvant drugs. Opioid rotation was indicated in half of cases, and the most common switch was from morphine to methadone.

[Comparison of postoperative analgesia with methadone versus morphine in cardiac surgery]. / Comparação da analgesia pós­operatória com uso de metadona versus morfina em cirurgia cardíaca.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain is an aggravating factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of methadone versus morphine using the numerical rating scale of pain and postoperative on-demand analgesia in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. METHOD: A randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial was performed with patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Morphine Group (MoG) and Methadone Group (MeG). At the end of cardiac surgery, 0.1 mg.kg-1 adjusted body weight of methadone or morphine was administered intravenously. Patients were referred to the ICU, where the following was assessed: extubation time, time to first analgesic request, number of analgesic and antiemetic drug doses within 36 hours, numerical pain scale at 12, 24, and 36hours postoperatively, and occurrence of adverse effects. RESULTS: Each group comprised 50 patients. Methadone showed 22% higher efficacy than morphine as it yielded a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) score of 6 and number-needed-to-harm (NNH) score of 16. The MeG showed a mean score of 1.9 ±2.2 according to the numerical pain scale at 24hours after surgery, whereas as the MoG showed a mean score of 2.9 ±2.6 (p =0.029). The MeG required less morphine (29%) than the MoG (43%) (p =0.002). However, the time to first analgesic request in the postoperative period was 145.9 ±178.5 minutes in the MeG, and 269.4 ±252.9 in the MoG (p =0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Methadone was effective for analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without extracorporeal circulation.

Patrones de prescripción de metadona entre médicos colombianos especialistas en manejo del dolor / Methadone Prescription Patterns among Pain Physicians in Colombia

Introducción: el dolor crónico es una enfermedad con graves consecuencias para personas, médicos y sistemas de salud. Una de las estrategias de manejo es el uso prolongado de opioides, y dentro de los disponibles en Colombia se encuentra la metadona, con características farmacológicas únicas y asociación con aumento de mortalidad por sobredosis y complicaciones cardiovasculares. La adecuada prescripción y seguimiento de metadona se relaciona con complicaciones similares al manejo con otros opioides. Objetivo: describir los patrones de prescripción de metadona entre médicos colombianos especialistas en manejo de dolor y comparar estos patrones de prescripción con las recomendaciones mayormente aceptadas por la comunidad científica internacional. Materiales y métodos: se utilizó una encuesta electrónica estructurada aplicada entre médicos especialistas en dolor identificados a través de las principales agremiaciones y programas de formación nacionales. Resultados: los encuestados que respondieron son mayoritariamente experimentados anestesiólogos, con entrenamiento universitario clínico y que trabajan en hospitales universitarios. La mayoría de ellos percibe como efectivo el manejo a largo plazo con opioides para el control analgésico y la mejoría funcional, a pesar de la falta de respaldo empírico. La mayoría no aplica las herramientas recomendadas por guías de práctica clínica, aunque las conocen. Conclusiones: se debe mejorar la educación de prescriptores de metadona para mejorar la seguridad de los pacientes. Se infiere pobre aplicabilidad de herramientas recomendadas por guías de práctica clínica en el medio colombiano. Los resultados de la presente encuesta no son fácilmente generalizables.

Background: Chronic pain is a disease with serious consequences for people, physicians, and health care systems. Chronic opioid usage is one of this therapy strategy. Methadone is among the available opioids in Colombia and it is characterized by unique pharmacological properties and increased mortality reports because of overdose and cardiovascular complications. Appropriate monitoring and prescribing patterns of methadone are associated with complications similar to chronic management with other opioids. Aim: To describe methadone prescribing patterns among Colombian pain physicians and compare them to the accepted recommendations by the international scientific community. Materials and Methods: An electronic structured survey was applied to pain specialist physicians identified through major pain study associations and national training programs. Results: Respondents of the survey are mostly experienced university certified physicians and anesthesiologists with clinical training working at university hospitals. Most of them perceive chronic opioid therapy as an effective strategy for pain relief and functional outcomes despite the lack of empirical support. Most of them know clinical practice guidelines but are not applying them despite this matter. Conclusions: We must enhance education for prescribers in order to improve patient safety. The recommended clinical practice guidelines are poorly applied by Colombian doctors. The results of this study must be cautiously assessed.

Caracterización del uso de metadona en pacientes paliativos en el Instituto Nacional del Cáncer, Santiago de Chile / Characterization of methadone use in palliative patients at the National Cancer Institute, Santiago, Chile

OBJETIVOS: realizar un estudio de tipo descriptivo y retrospectivo para caracterizar el uso y efecto de metadona en una población de pacientes de la unidad de cuidados paliativos del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: los datos analizados se obtuvieron desde los registros de la farmacia y las fichas clínicas de los pacientes de la unidad de cuidados paliativos del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer que estaban siendo tratados con metadona durante el mes de agosto de 2013. las variables cuantificadas fueron edad, sexo, diagnóstico oncológico, tipo de dolor, motivo de indicación de metadona, duración del tratamiento, dosis utilizadas, respuesta analgésica y uso concomitante con analgésicos no opioides. RESULTADOS: la población de pacientes bajo control mensual en la unidad de cuidados paliativos al mes de agosto fue de 445 pacientes. en el estudio se incluyeron a 31 pacientes que estaban en ese periodo tratados con metadona, lo que representa un 7% del total de pacientes. la indicación, según tipo de dolor, fue en un 80,6% por dolor de tipo neuropático o mixto. la indicación de metadona se debió, en un 68%, a una rotación de opioides y solo en un 3% fue por indicación primaria. la dosis promedio diaria fluctuó entre 16,7 mg, al inicio del tratamiento; y 26,1 mg, al momento del estudio o periodo de observación. la mediana de uso fue de 211 días. la intensidad del dolor, medida por la escala numérica verbal, fue de 8,3 ± 0,3 mg al inicio del tratamiento y 5,4 ± 0,6 mg durante el control de agosto de 2013, lo que significa una disminución promedio de 34,9%. DISCUSIÓN: el uso de metadona en la unidad de cuidados paliativos del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer está en concordancia con las propuestas internacionales, indicándose principalmente como rotación de opioides y en el tratamiento del dolor neuropático. el análisis de las fichas mostró utilización de dosis bajas de metadona (menores de 30 mg), con pequeños incrementos de dosis durante el período de tratamiento, obteniéndose como resultado una reducción significativa del dolor.

OBJETIVES: to carry out a descriptive and retrospective study to characterize the use and effect of methadone in a group of patients of the Palliative Care Unit of the National Cancer Institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the information was obtained from the patient pharmacy and clinical records at the palliative care unit of the National Cancer Institute who were being treated with methadone during the month of august, 2013. the variables assessed were age, sex, oncology diagnosis, type of pain, reason for methadone prescription, treatment duration, dosage, pain response and associated use of non- opioid analgesics. RESULTS: the patient group under monthly monitoring at the palliative care unit in august was made up of 445 people. the study included 31 patients who at that time were being treated with methadone, 7% of the total. the indication according to the type of pain was in an 80.6% caused by a neuropathic or mixed pain. a 68% of the methadone indication was caused by an opioid rotation and only a 3% by a primary indication. the average daily dose went from 16.7 mg at the beginning to 26.1 mg at the moment the study or observation period was carried out. the use average was of 211 days. The pain intensity, using a numeric scale, was of 8.3 ± 0.3 mg at the beginning of the treatment and a 5.4 ± 0.6 mg during the august 2013 control, which means an average decrease of 34,9 %. DISCUSSION: the use of methadone at the palliative care unit of the National Cancer Institute is in accordance with the international proposals, being indicated mostly as opioid rotation and in the neuropathic pain treatment. the record analysis showed a low dose use of methadone (lower than 30 mg), with small dose increase during the treatment period, getting a significant pain decrease as a result

Efectividad del cambio de tratamiento desde Metadona a Buprenorfina/Naloxona en dependientes a opiáceos, Bilbao - España / Effectiveness of treatment change from methadone to Buprenorphine / Naloxone in opiate dependents, Bilbao - Spain

A nivel mundial la dependencia a opiáceos es un problema vigente, y los pacientes afectados por esta condición requieren programas de tratamiento sustitutivo farmacológico, que utilizan tradicionalmente Metadona. Actualmente, existe debate sobre el hecho de que la Buprenorfina/Naloxona podria ser utilizada como un reemplazo adecuado del fármaco tradicional. Las investigaciones aún no son totalmente concluyentes, faltando estudios que prueben los resultados en la práctica clínica. Objetivos: Determinar la efectividad del tratamiento con Buprenorfina/Naloxona como reemplazo de la metadona en pacientes dependientes de opiáceos tratados en un Módulo de Asistencia Psicosocial en la ciudad de Bilbao, España. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio cuasiexperimental, cuantitativo, longitudinal, prospectivo, con 21 pacientes dependientes de opiáceos que formaban parte del Programa de mantenimiento con Metadona con dosis inferiores o iguales a 40 mg/día, en quienes se sustituyó ese tratamiento por el de Buprenorfina/Naloxona (8mg/2mg) siguiendo para esto los criterios de la Guía para el tratamiento de la adicción a opiáceos con Buprenorfina/Naloxona de la Sociedad Científica Española de estudios sobre alcohol, el alcoholismo y otras toxicomanías del 2010. Resultados: Después de tres meses de cambio de terapéutica a Buprenorfina/Naloxona se evidencio una reducción estadísticamente significativa en el consumo de opiáceos ilegales, medido a través de los controles de substancias en orina desde un promedio de 2,67 controles positivos con metadona, a 2,24 controles con Buprenorfina/Naloxona. La adherencia, se mantuvo similar a la previa, presentando además una retención del 100% de los pacientes. La calidad de vida, medida con el Test TECVASP, presento una mejora estadísticamente significativa, desde una puntuación de 76,76 cuando recibían Metadona (DE 6,41) hasta 90,33 (DE 5,77 ) con la nueva terapéutica. Conclusiones: Cambiar la terapia de mantenimiento con Metadona, en pacientes dependientes de opioides, por buprenorfina/naloxona es una buena opción, ya que tiene una efectividad similar en términos de adherencia y retención, y produce una mayor reducción en el uso de opiáceos ilegales, al tiempo que mejora la calidad de vida del paciente.

At the global level, opioid dependence is an ongoing problem, and patients with this condition require pharmacological substitution treatment programs, which traditionally use methadone. Currently there is debate over whether Buprenorphine / Naloxone could be used as a suitable replacement for the traditional drug. The investigations are not yet totally conclusive, lacking studies that prove the results in the clinical practice. Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of treatment with Buprenorphine / Naloxone as a replacement for Methadone in opioid dependent patients treated in a Psychosocial Assistance Module in the city of Bilbao, Spain. Methods: A quasi-experimental, quantitative, longitudinal, prospective study was conducted with 21 opioid-dependent patients that were part of the maintenance program with Methadone at doses lower than or equal to 40 mg / day, in which treatment was replaced by that of Buprenorphine / Naloxone (8 mg/2 mg) following for this the criteria of the Guide for the treatment of the addiction to opiates with Buprenorphine / Naloxone of the Spanish Scientific Society of studies on alcohol, alcoholism and other drug addictions of 2010. Results: After a three-month change in therapy to Buprenorphine / Naloxone, a statistically significant reduction in illegal opioid use was observed, measured through urine substance controls from an average of 2.67 methadone-positive controls 2.24 controls with Buprenorphine / Naloxone. The Adherence remained similar to the previous one, presenting a retention of 100% of the patients. Quality of life, measured with the TECVASP test, showed a statistically significant improvement, from a score of 76.76 when receiving Methadone (DE 6.41) to 90.33 (DE 5.77) with the new therapy. Conclusions: Changing maintenance therapy with methadone, in opioid-dependent patients, by buprenorphine/naloxone is a good option, because it has a similar effectiveness in terms of adherence and retention, and produces a greater reduction in the use of illegal opiates, and the same time improves the quality of life of the patient.