[Photobiomodulation in the prevention and the management of side effects of cancer treatments: Bases, results and perspectives]. / Photobiomodulation dans la prévention et la prise en charge des effets secondaires des traitements anticancéreux : bases, bilan et perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Assess the current and potential indications of photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy and their level of evidence in the prevention or treatment of side effects related to oncology treatments (radiation therapy, and to a minimal extent favored and hematopoietic stem cell transplants). And report on the recommended modalities (parameters and doses) of PBM therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Embase, Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCO, Scopus, and LILACS databases were systematically reviewed to include and analyze publications of clinical studies that evaluated PBM in the prevention or management side effects related to cancer treatments. The keywords used were "photobiomodulation"; "low level laser therapy"; "acute oral mucositis"; "acute dysphagia"; "acute radiation dermatitis"; "lymphedema"; "xerostomia"; "dysgeusia"; "hyposalivation"; "lockjaw"; "bone necrosis"; "osteoradionecrosis"; "radiation induced fibrosis"; "voice and speech alterations"; "palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia"; "graft versus host disease"; "peripheral neuropathy"; "chemotherapy induced alopecia". Prospective studies were included, while retrospective cohorts and non-original articles were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: PBM in the red or infrared spectrum has been shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials in the prevention and management of certain complications related to radiotherapy, in particular acute mucositis, epitheliitis and upper limb lymphedema. The level of evidence associated with PBM was heterogeneous, but overall remained moderate. The main limitations were the diversity and the lack of precision of the treatment protocols which could compromise the efficiency and the reproducibility of the results of the PBM. For other effects related to chemo/radiation therapy (dysgeusia, osteonecrosis, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia) and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (graft versus host disease), treatment with PBM suffers from a lack of studies or limited studies at the origin of a weakened level of proof. However, based on these results, it was possible to establish safe practice parameters and doses of PBM. CONCLUSION: Published data suggest that PBM could therefore be considered as supportive care in its own right for patients treated with radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, hormone therapy or targeted therapies, whether in clinical practice or clinical trials. therapies. However, until solid data have been published on its long-term safety, the use of PBM should be considered with caution and within the recommended parameters and doses, particularly when practiced in areas of known or possible tumours. In this case, the patient should be informed of the theoretical benefits and risks of PBM in order to obtain informed consent before treatment.

Efficacy of Kanglaite against radiotherapy-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer, a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To explore the potential protective effect of Kanglaite injection against radiotherapy-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm, and phase II trial. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3-4 radiation-induced mucositis. The secondary endpoints were hematological toxicity, non-hematological toxicity, nutritional status, and quality of life. All patients received 20g Kanglaite daily concurrently with radiotherapy. RESULTS: The data of 46 patients were available for analysis. The incidence rates of grade 3 mucositis, pain, dysphagia, and neutropenia were 10.9%, 2.2%, 10.9%, and 6.5%, respectively, while the incidence of grade 4 acute toxicities was zero. The rate of opioid use was 2.2%. Radiotherapy dose reduction was 2.2% and no irradiation field was modified. The nutritional supports were oro-enteral nutritional supplements (13.0%), TPN (10.9%), and feeding tubes (0%) during radiotherapy. After radiotherapy, 52.2% of patients lost weight, and the weight loss was <10%. The mean pain score in the QLQ-H&N35 and QLQ-C30 was <50. Patients had nearly normal physical, emotional, and cognitive functions. CONCLUSIONS: A low incidence of grade 3-4 radiation-induced mucositis and no severe acute toxic events, with favorable nutritional status and quality of life, were observed in cancer patients after Kanglaite injection. Our findings highlight the need for a prospective, multicenter, and randomized study to investigate the effect of Kanglaite injection on the reduction of radiation-induced mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer.

[State of art of photobiomodulation in the management of radiotherapy adverse events: Indications and level of evidence]. / État de l'art de la photobiomodulation dans la prise en charge des effets secondaires de la radiothérapie : indications et niveaux de preuve.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the current and potential indications of photobiomodulation (PBM) and their level of evidence in the prevention or management of radiation therapy-related side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Embase, Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCO, Scopus, and LILACS databases were systematically reviewed to include and analyze publications of clinical studies that have assessed PBM in the prevention or management of radiotherapy-related side effects. The keywords used were "photobiomodulation"; "low level laser therapy"; "acute oral mucositis"; "acute dysphagia"; "acute radiation dermatitis"; "lymphedema"; "xerostomia"; "hyposalivation"; "trismus"; "bone necrosis"; "osteoradionecrosis"; and "radiation induced fibrosis". Prospective studies were included, whereas retrospective cohorts and non-original articles were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: PBM in the red or infrared spectrum has demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials in the prevention and management of radiotherapy-related side effects, especially acute oral mucositis, acute radiation dermatitis, and upper extremity lymphedema. The level of evidence associated with PBM was heterogeneous, but overall was still moderate. The main shortcomings were the diversity and lack of detail in treatment protocols, which could have compromised efficiency and reproducibility of PBM results. CONCLUSION: The published data suggest that PBM may be considered as a full-fledged supportive care for patients treated with radiotherapy, or at least in the setting of a therapeutic clinical trial. However, until strong evidence has been published on its long-term safety, the use of PBM should be considered with caution, specifically when applied near areas with proven or potential tumors. The patient should be informed of the theoretical benefits and risks of PBM in order to obtain his informed consent before treatment.

[Chemo-induced mucositis in pediatric oncology: Perspectives?] / Mucites chimio-induites en oncologie pédiatrique : quelles perspectives ?

Mucositis is defined as inflammatory and/or ulcerative lesions of the oral and/or gastrointestinal tract. It occurs in approximately 40% to 50% of adults patients receiving conventional chemotherapy and up to 75% of patients receiving high dose chemotherapy as conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It is a toxic side effect, which strongly impairs quality of life and leads to refractory pain, increasing risk of infection and even therapeutic modifications. Despite improvements made, the management of mucositis remains a challenge and is still not consensual. A multicentric survey of practices concerning the preventive and curative management of chemo-induced mucositis in pediatric oncology department in France was carried out using a standardized questionnaire. Results confirm heterogeneous practices and the small progress made during the last decade. This national survey and an analysis of the recent literature leads to propose guidelines for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in children receiving treatment for cancer.

Early side effects of radiation treatment for head and neck cancer.

Purpose of this review of medical literature is to present the immediate side effects of radiation therapy for head and neck cancer and their treatment. The likelihood and severity of these immediate side effects depends on a number of factors, including the total dose of radiation delivered, over what time it was delivered and what parts of the head and neck received radiation. Early side effects include: inflammation of the oropharyngeal mucosa (mucositis), painful swallowing (odynophagia), difficulty swallowing (dysphagia), hoarseness, lack of saliva (xerostomia), orofacial pain, laryngeal radionecrosis, dermatitis, hair loss, nausea, vomiting, inadequate nutrition and hydration, and weight loss. These complications can interfere with, and delay treatment. Most of these side effects generally dissipate over time. In conclusion, radiation treatment for the head and neck cancer causes significant early side effects. Many of these side effects present difficult challenges to the patients. Their recognition and treatment can significantly improve the patients' health, long-term survival and quality of life. The review provides information that can assist head and cancer survivors deal with radiation side effects.

[Treatment of mucositis pain: News and prospects]. / Traitement des douleurs de mucite : actualités et perspectives.

Mucositis, an acute inflammation of the digestive mucosa, is one of the main toxicities secondary to oncological treatments. Among its consequences, mucositis-related pain is an important complication due to its intensity and repercussion, especially on quality of life. Treatment of pain plays a central role in management of mucositis. It must be multimodal, combining local and general opioid or non-opioid treatments, adapted to pain intensity and based on international recommendations updated in 2014. A systemic analgesic treatment with morphine with a patient-controlled analgesia device is often necessary in severe mucositis. In case of insufficient analgesia, use of co-analgesics (paracetamol, ketamine, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants) can improve analgesic control and reduce morphine doses. Non-drug strategies (distraction, relaxation, hypnosis) and preventive measures must be a major concern. Among them, laser therapy using a low power athermal laser beam, is a promising therapeutic strategy whose effectiveness is based on its analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and healing properties. Despite many available studies, there is a limited number of clinically effective therapies. New therapeutic agents for the prevention and treatment of mucositis and its pain, based on the biological phenomena involved, must be further developed to improve the efficacy of analgesia.

Pharmacological modulation of radiation-induced oral mucosal complications.

Radiation-induced mucositis is a common toxicity, especially in patients with head and neck cancers. Despite recent technological advances in radiation therapy, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, radiation-induced mucositis is still causing treatment disruptions, negatively affecting patients' long and short term quality of life, and impacting medical resources use with economic consequences. The objective of this article was to review the latest updates in the management of radiation-induced mucositis, with a focus on pharmaceutical strategies for the prevention or treatment of mucositis. Although numerous studies analysing the prevention and management of oral radiation-induced mucositis have been conducted, there are still few reliable data to guide daily clinical practice. Furthermore, most of the tested drugs have shown no (anti-inflammatory cytokine, growth factors) or limited (palifermin) effect. Therapies for acute oral mucositis are predominantly focused on improving oral hygiene and providing symptoms control. Although low-level laser therapy proved efficient in preventing radiation-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer, this intervention requires equipment and trained medical staff, and is therefore insufficiently developed in clinical routine. New effective pharmacological agents able to prevent or reverse radio-induced mucositis are required.

[Prevention and treatment of mucositis in children with oral cancers: Practical recommendations]. / Actualités de la prévention et du traitement des mucites orales chez les enfants cancéreux : recommandations pratiques.

Oral mucositis is an inflammation of the mucosa of the oral cavity of various etiologies. This is a common and debilitating complication in children treated with chemoradiotherapy for cancer. Its management remains a major concern both for the doctor than the patient. It affects the quality of life of patients and families. It may initiate the functional and vital prognosis because of the judgment of cancer treatment. Several treatment options are available, but there is no clear consensus therapeutic especially for the pediatric population. We have identified, through a comprehensive literature search indexed publications on this subject in order to review the pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches that have been used to prevent and treat oral mucositis. Thus, current recommendations for the management of oral mucositis are very limited, and therefore the standard of care for this complication was palliative. In recent years several studies have revealed that the use of low-energy laser was particularly interesting in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced or chemically induced mucositis. It significantly reduces the pain, the severity and duration of the ulcer by promoting wound healing. Randomized controlled trials with a large number of patients are expected to establish preventive and therapeutic protocols. Treatment with low power laser, known devoid of side effects, is a very promising oncology care to support radio-induced mucositis and chemotherapy.

[Mucosal tolerance and low level laser therapy: Is the delegation to radiation technicians possible?]. / Tolérance muqueuse et laser de basse énergie : la délégation aux manipulateurs en radiothérapie est-elle possible ?

Mucositis remains a frequent complication of radiotherapy. Low level laser applications are used to accelerate the healing process. This technique is used routinely in our centre. It is performed by delegation by radiotherapists. The conditions of this delegation of tasks are addressed here.

[Mucositis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Risk factors, clinical consequences and prophylaxis]. / La mucite post-allogreffe de cellules souches hématopoïétiques: facteurs de risque, conséquences cliniques et prévention.

AIM: Oral mucositis is a very common complication of allograft. However, preventive treatments are still limited. The objective of this study is to identify risk factors for onset of oral mucositis in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (HSCT), to measure clinical consequences and to study their evolution according to type of prevention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing HSCT in hematology unit of CHU Besançon between January 2009 and August 2010 were included, and received according to their choice, either the standard protocol: solution of sodium bicarbonate 1.4% associated with chlorhexidine-chlorobutanol (Eludril(®)) (n=49), or the experimental treatment by the ionic solution, Caphosol(®) (n=42). RESULTS: The overall incidence of severe mucositis and mucositis is respectively 69% and 36%. In multivariate analysis, a myeloablative conditioning (OR=11.1) and prevention of GVHD (graft-versus-host disease) including methotrexate (OR=7.5) appear such as the two significant mucositis risk factors. The presence of mucositis resulting in a significant increase in the incidence of febrile aplasia (P=0.008) and the use of opioid analgesics and parenteral nutrition (P<10(-3)). The risk of acute gastrointestinal GVHD is also increased in severe mucositis (P=0.01). The duration of post-transplant hospitalization is not changed. The type of prevention does not influence the incidence of mucositis (P=0.11). CONCLUSION: The consequences of mucositis are significant and the risk factors identified. The interest of the ionic solution Caphosol(®) seems limited, the incidence of mucositis is not decreased by this prevention.

[Oral toxicity of targeted anticancer therapies]. / Toxicité endobuccale des thérapies ciblées anticancéreuses.

While toxicity of targeted anticancer therapies on the oral mucosa seems relatively frequent in clinical practice, it has not been properly characterized to date, apart from aphthous-like lesions due to mTOR inhibitors. Herein, we report the main oral lesions associated with these new therapies, with a description of the most frequent but also the most characteristic clinical manifestations of these drugs, such as anti-EGFR-induced mucositis, BRAF-inhibitor-associated hyperkeratosis, benign migratory glossitis and osteonecrosis of the jaw observed with angiogenesis inhibitors, as well as lesions more specifically linked with imatinib.