3'-UTR Sequence of Exosomal NANOGP8 DNA as an Extracellular Vesicle-Localization Signal.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are garnering attention as a safe and efficient biomolecule delivery system. EVs intrinsically play a crucial role in intercellular communication and pathophysiology by transporting functionally active DNA molecules. The internalized DNA pleiotropically affects the recipient cells. Considering these salient features, an intentional incorporation of specific DNA gene cassettes into EVs and their subsequent delivery to the target cells has potential applications in genetic engineering. Moreover, efficient ways to insert the DNA into EVs during their biogenesis is valuable. Our current research is a step in the development of this technology. As such, cancer cells are known to secrete exosomes containing increased amounts of double-stranded DNA than normal cells. The clonal analysis in our previously published data revealed that exosomes released from various cancer cells contained a significantly larger population of NANOGP8 DNA with a 22-base pair insertion in the 3'-untranslated region (UTR) compared to those secreted by normal cells. This finding led us to hypothesize that the 22-base pair insertion may act as a signal to facilitate the incorporation of NANOGP8 DNA into the exosomes. To test this hypothesis, we compared the EV localization of an Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein (EGFP) gene fused with the NANOGP8 3'-UTR, with and without the 22-base pair insertion. The quantitative PCR analysis showed a significantly higher EGFP DNA accumulation in exosomes released from cells transfected with the gene cassette containing the 3'-UTR with the 22-base pair insertion. The discovery of a DNA localization signal in exosomal DNA's 3'-UTR could pave the way for the development of an EV-based DNA delivery system. This technology will open new possibilities in genetic engineering and innovative therapies using nucleic acid medicine.

NAT10-mediated ac4C modification promotes stemness and chemoresistance of colon cancer by stabilizing NANOGP8.

Background: Colon cancer (CC) stem cells can self-renew as well as expand, thereby promoting tumor progression and conferring resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. The acetyltransferase NAT10 mediates N4-acetylcytidine (ac4C) modification, which in turn drives tumorigenesis, metastasis, stemness properties maintenance, and cell fate decisions. Nonetheless, the specific involvement of ac4C modification mediated by NAT10 in regulating stemness and chemosensitivity in CC remains undetermined. Methods: The levels of NAT10 in normal colon and chemoresistant CC tissues were determined utilizing quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction alongside immunohistochemistry. Assessing cancer cell stemness and chemosensitivity was conducted by various methods including spheroid and colony formation, western blotting, and flow cytometry. RNA-Seq was used to identify target genes, and RNA immunoprecipitation analysis was used to explore the potential mechanisms. Results: We observed NAT10 overexpression and increased ac4C modification levels in chemoresistant CC tissues. The in vivo and in vitro analysis findings suggested that NAT10 promoted CC cell stemness while suppressing their chemosensitivity. Conversely, Remodelin, a NAT10-specific inhibitor, enhanced CC cell chemosensitivity. Mechanistically, NAT10 increased the level of NANOGP8 ac4C modification and promoted NANOGP8 mRNA stability. Conclusions: NAT10 promotes the maintenance of stemness and chemoresistance in CC cells by augmenting the mRNA stability of NANOGP8. The inhibition of NAT10 via Remodelin improves chemotherapeutic efficacy and impedes CC progression.

A Restriction Endonuclease-Based Assay to Distinguish NANOGP8 Retrogene from Parental NANOG.

NANOG is an embryonic transcription factor, which gets reexpressed in cancer stem or tumor initiating cells. NANOGP8, a retrogene belonging to the NANOG family, is predominantly expressed in cancer cells and shows very high similarity with NANOG both at the nucleotide and at the protein level. The high similarity makes it extremely challenging to distinguish between these two transcription factors. Here we describe a highly efficient restriction endonuclease-based assay, which is performed on cDNA and allows to distinguish NANOGP8 from NANOG. This assay is critical to understand the specific role of NANOGP8 in cancer stemness, which in turn helps to unravel the therapeutic potential of targeting this undruggable transcription factor through gene therapy, for treatment of various cancers.

Methods for the Detection of Circulating Pseudogenes and Their Use as Cancer Biomarkers.

Pseudogenes, once considered the "junk remnants of genes," are found to significantly affect the regulatory network of healthy and cancer cells, as well as to be highly specific markers of cancer cell identity. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of pseudogenes has a diagnostic and prognostic value in cancer research via the detection of cell-free pseudogenic DNA circulating throughout the body. Exosomes, nanoparticles with a lipid membrane secreted by almost all types of cells, carry cellular-blueprint molecules, including pseudogenic DNA, as cancer-specific cargo. Therefore, it is vital to develop better laboratory techniques and protocols to identify exosome-associated pseudogenes.

Roles of NANOGP8 in cancer metastasis and cancer stem cell invasion during development of castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common types of cancer and the emerging resistance to androgen deprivation therapy in PCa aggravates disease progression. In this study, we examined the potential pro-tumorigenic functions of NANOGP8 in prostate cancer development. METHODS: Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed higher NANOGP8 expression in androgen independent tumors, as well as a recurrent prostate tumor in patient samples. We then established a novel two-way inducible NANOGP8-short hairpin RNA experimental system, in which the NANOGP8 expression was transiently induced by adding doxycycline in the diet of NOD/SCID mice. RESULTS: The knockdown of NANOGP8 inhibited implanted tumor growth and the progression of castration-resistant PCa. NANOGP8-deficient PCa cells lost their cancer stem cell and gene expression programs. To further investigate the functions of NANOGP8 in PCa stem cells, real-time cell tracking was used to monitor the cell division modes and differentiation patterns of NANOGP8+ cells. The expression level of NANOGP8 markedly influenced the cell division mode of NANOGP8+ PCa cells and was strongly correlated with their pluripotency, reflected by robust telomerase activity and longer telomere length. NANOGP8 expression was also associated with the metastatic capacity of PCa cells. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, we propose that NANOGP8 could serve as an effective therapeutic target for the treatment of PCa.

NANOG/NANOGP8 Localizes at the Centrosome and is Spatiotemporally Associated with Centriole Maturation.

NANOG is a transcription factor involved in the regulation of pluripotency and stemness. The functional paralog of NANOG, NANOGP8, differs from NANOG in only three amino acids and exhibits similar reprogramming activity. Given the transcriptional regulatory role played by NANOG, the nuclear localization of NANOG/NANOGP8 has primarily been considered to date. In this study, we investigated the intriguing extranuclear localization of NANOG and demonstrated that a substantial pool of NANOG/NANOGP8 is localized at the centrosome. Using double immunofluorescence, the colocalization of NANOG protein with pericentrin was identified by two independent anti-NANOG antibodies among 11 tumor and non-tumor cell lines. The validity of these observations was confirmed by transient expression of GFP-tagged NANOG, which also colocalized with pericentrin. Mass spectrometry of the anti-NANOG immunoprecipitated samples verified the antibody specificity and revealed the expression of both NANOG and NANOGP8, which was further confirmed by real-time PCR. Using cell fractionation, we show that a considerable amount of NANOG protein is present in the cytoplasm of RD and NTERA-2 cells. Importantly, cytoplasmic NANOG was unevenly distributed at the centrosome pair during the cell cycle and colocalized with the distal region of the mother centriole, and its presence was markedly associated with centriole maturation. Along with the finding that the centrosomal localization of NANOG/NANOGP8 was detected in various tumor and non-tumor cell types, these results provide the first evidence suggesting a common centrosome-specific role of NANOG.

Fli-1 promotes proliferation and upregulates NANOGP8 expression in T-lymphocyte leukemia cells.

Friend leukemia integration 1 (Fli-1) is a member of the E26 transformation-specific (ETS) transcription factor family. Fli-1 regulates normal hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis, and its aberrant expression underlies virus-induced leukemias and various types of human cancers. NANOGP8, a retro-pseudogene of stem cell mediator NANOG, is expressed predominantly in cancer cells and plays a role in tumorigenesis. In this study, we demonstrate that Fli-1 expression enhances human acute T-cell leukemia Jurkat cell proliferation and that Fli-1 acts as a transcriptional activator of NANOGP8 expression in these cells. NANOGP8 and Fli-1 are highly expressed in Jurkat cells, whereas NANOG was undetectable at both the RNA and protein levels. Moreover, the expression of endogenous NANOGP8 was significantly influenced by gain of function and loss of function of Fli-1. Promoter-reporter assays showed that NANOGP8 transcription was significantly upregulated by dose-dependent Fli-1 overexpression. A series of deletion mutagenesis of NANOGP8 promoter sequence revealed that NANOGP8 promoter activity was tightly regulated and found the minimal promoter region sufficient to activate NANOGP8 transcription mediated by Fli-1. Moreover, site-directed mutagenesis of the putative binding site abolished both NANOGP8 full-length and minimal promoter activities. Binding assays revealed that Fli-1 directly interacts with the potent binding site in NANOG promoter region. Taken together, our data demonstrate that Fli-1 is a novel upstream transcriptional activator of NANOGP8 and provide the molecular details of Fli-1-mediated NANOGP8 gene expression. Ultimately, these findings may contribute to understanding the expanded regulatory mechanisms of oncogenic NANOGP8 and ETS family transcription factors in leukemogenesis.

Transgenic overexpression of NanogP8 in the mouse prostate is insufficient to initiate tumorigenesis but weakly promotes tumor development in the Hi-Myc mouse model.

This project was undertaken to address a critical cancer biology question: Is overexpression of the pluripotency molecule Nanog sufficient to initiate tumor development in a somatic tissue? Nanog1 is critical for the self-renewal and pluripotency of ES cells, and its retrotransposed homolog, NanogP8 is preferentially expressed in somatic cancer cells. Our work has shown that shRNA-mediated knockdown of NanogP8 in prostate, breast, and colon cancer cells inhibits tumor regeneration whereas inducible overexpression of NanogP8 promotes cancer stem cell phenotypes and properties. To address the key unanswered question whether tissue-specific overexpression of NanogP8 is sufficient to promote tumor development in vivo, we generated a NanogP8 transgenic mouse model, in which the ARR2PB promoter was used to drive NanogP8 cDNA. Surprisingly, the ARR2PB-NanogP8 transgenic mice were viable, developed normally, and did not form spontaneous tumors in >2 years. Also, both wild type and ARR2PB-NanogP8 transgenic mice responded similarly to castration and regeneration and castrated ARR2PB-NanogP8 transgenic mice also did not develop tumors. By crossing the ARR2PB-NanogP8 transgenic mice with ARR2PB-Myc (i.e., Hi-Myc) mice, we found that the double transgenic (i.e., ARR2PB-NanogP8; Hi-Myc) mice showed similar tumor incidence and histology to the Hi-Myc mice. Interestingly, however, we observed white dots in the ventral lobes of the double transgenic prostates, which were characterized as overgrown ductules/buds featured by crowded atypical Nanog-expressing luminal cells. Taken together, our present work demonstrates that transgenic overexpression of NanogP8 in the mouse prostate is insufficient to initiate tumorigenesis but weakly promotes tumor development in the Hi-Myc mouse model.

Oncogenic NanogP8 expression regulates cell proliferation and migration through the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in human gastric cancer - SGC-7901cell line.

BACKGROUND: Although elevated expression of NanogP8 has been detected in many human tumor tissues, its role in gastric tumorigenesis remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the function and regulatory mechanism of NanogP8 in gastric cancer. METHODS: In this study, NanogP8 cDNA was amplified by real time polymerase chain reaction from the human gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901. The shRNA for RNA interference was established. The NanogP8, pAkt, Akt, pERK, ERK, p-mTOR, and mTOR proteins were detected by using the Western blot assay. Cell viability was evaluated by using the CCK-8 assay. Cell migration and invasion were also examined by using the transwell assay. RESULTS: The results indicated that the NanogP8 overexpression promoted proliferation and migration of SGC-7901 cell line, whereas its ablation exerted opposite effects. Interestingly, NanogP8 activated Akt, a key mediator of survival signals, and without affecting total Akt protein level. The NanogP8-increased gastric cell proliferation was downregulated by Akt inhibition. Our results further showed that increasing NanogP8 expression in human gastric cancer cells promoted cell proliferation by activating the AKT/mTOR pathway and further maintained gastric cell survival. CONCLUSION: Our findings extend the knowledge regarding the oncogenic functions and proved that the NanogP8 regulates cell proliferation and migration by Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in human gastric cancer SGC-7901cell line.

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout of NANOG and NANOGP8 decreases the malignant potential of prostate cancer cells.

NANOG expression in prostate cancer is highly correlated with cancer stem cell characteristics and resistance to androgen deprivation. However, it is not clear whether NANOG or its pseudogenes contribute to the malignant potential of cancer. We established NANOG- and NANOGP8-knockout DU145 prostate cancer cell lines using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Knockouts of NANOG and NANOGP8 significantly attenuated malignant potential, including sphere formation, anchorage-independent growth, migration capability, and drug resistance, compared to parental DU145 cells. NANOG and NANOGP8 knockout did not inhibit in vitro cell proliferation, but in vivo tumorigenic potential decreased significantly. These phenotypes were recovered in NANOG- and NANOGP8-rescued cell lines. These results indicate that NANOG and NANOGP8 proteins are expressed in prostate cancer cell lines, and NANOG and NANOGP8 equally contribute to the high malignant potential of prostate cancer.

Regulation of NANOG in cancer cells.

As one of the key pluripotency transcription factors, NANOG plays a critical role in maintaining the self-renewal and pluripotency in normal embryonic stem cells. Recent data indicate that NANOG is expressed in a variety of cancers and its expression correlates with poor survival in cancer patients. Of interest, many studies suggest that NANOG enhances the defined characteristics of cancer stem cells and may thus function as an oncogene to promote carcinogenesis. Therefore, NANOG expression determines the cell fate not only in pluripotent cells but also in cancer cells. Although the regulation of NANOG in normal embryonic stem cells is reasonably well understood, the regulation of NANOG in cancer cells has only emerged recently. The current review provides a most updated summary on how NANOG expression is regulated during tumor development and progression.

The pluripotency factor Nanog is directly upregulated by the androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: The Androgen Receptor (AR) is a nuclear hormone receptor that functions as a critical oncogene in all stages of prostate cancer progression, including progression to castration-resistance following androgen-deprivation therapy. Thus, identifying and targeting critical AR-regulated genes is one potential method to block castration-resistant cancer proliferation. Of particular importance are transcription factors that regulate stem cell pluripotency; many of these genes are emerging as critical oncogenes in numerous tumor cell types. Of these, Nanog has been previously shown to increase the self-renewal and stem-like properties of prostate cancer cells. Thus, we hypothesized that Nanog is a candidate AR target gene that may impart castration-resistance. METHODS: We modulated AR signaling in LNCaP prostate cancer cells and assayed for Nanog expression. Direct AR binding to the NANOG promoter was tested using AR Chromatin Immunoprecipation (ChIP) and analyses of publically available AR ChIP-sequencing data-sets. Nanog over-expressing cells were analyzed for cell growth and cytotoxicity in response to the AR antagonist enzalutamide and the microtubule stabilizing agent docetaxel. RESULTS: AR signaling upregulates Nanog mRNA and protein. AR binds directly to the NANOG promoter, and was not identified within 75 kb of the NANOGP8 pseudogene, suggesting the NANOG gene locus was preferentially activated. Nanog overexpression in LNCaP cells increases overall growth, but does not increase resistance to enzalutamide or docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Nanog is a novel oncogenic AR target gene in prostate cancer cells, and stable expression of Nanog increases proliferation and growth of prostate cancer cells, but not resistance to enzalutamide or docetaxel.

Activated 5'flanking region of NANOGP8 in a self-renewal environment is associated with increased sphere formation and tumor growth of prostate cancer cells.

INTRODUCTION: NANOGP8 is a retrogene which encodes a full-length protein similar to the NANOG1 gene. The expression of NANOGP8 has been documented in several cancers and is related to cell proliferation and tumor development. However, the regulation of NANOGP8 expression has not been investigated. Therefore, the role of NANOGP8 in cell proliferation has not been completely understood. METHODS: We evaluate the expression of NANOG1 and NANOGP8 in prostate cancer cell lines and primary cultures of prostate tissues. We investigate clonogenicity, sphere formation, and xenograft tumor growth of prostate cancer cells with an activated 5'flanking region of NANOGP8. We examine the role of NANOGP8 in cell cycle progression. RESULTS: In the prostate cells the NANOG RNA was transcribed from NANOGP8 and not from NANOG1. Cells with the activated 5'flanking region of NANOGP8 exhibited enhanced clonogenicity, sphere formation, and xenograft tumor growth. The sphere culture and tumor initiation mouse mode promoted the activation of the 5'flanking region of NANOGP8. Forced expression of NANOGP8 increased the entry into the cell cycle. DISCUSSION: In prostate cells NANOGP8 is a predominant molecule of NANOG. The activation of 5'flanking sequence of NANOGP8 could play a role in the regulation of the stem-like properties of cancer stem cells and prostate tumor initiation and development. The microenvironment favoring cancer stem cells could promote the activation of the 5'flanking region of NANOGP8.

In vivo functional studies of tumor-specific retrogene NanogP8 in transgenic animals.

The current study was undertaken to investigate potential oncogenic functions of NanogP8, a tumor-specific retrogene homolog of Nanog (expressed in pluripotent cells), in transgenic animal models. To this end, human primary prostate tumor-derived NanogP8 was targeted to the cytokeratin 14 (K14) cellular compartment, and two lines of K14-NanogP8 mice were derived. The line 1 animals, expressing high levels of NanogP8, experienced perinatal lethality and developmental abnormalities in multiple organs, including the skin, tongue, eye, and thymus in surviving animals. On postnatal day 5 transgenic skin, for example, there was increased c-Myc expression and Ki-67(+) cells accompanied by profound abnormalities in skin development such as thickened interfollicular epidermis and dermis and lack of hypodermis and sebaceous glands. The line 3 mice, expressing low levels of NanogP8, were grossly normal except cataract development by 4-6 mo of age. Surprisingly, both lines of mice do not develop spontaneous tumors related to transgene expression. Even more unexpectedly, high levels of NanogP8 expression in L1 mice actually inhibited tumor development in a two-stage chemical carcinogenesis model. Mechanistic studies revealed that constitutive NanogP8 overexpression in adult L1 mice reduced CD34(+)α6(+) and Lrig-1(+) bulge stem cells, impaired keratinocyte migration, and repressed the expression of many stem cell-associated genes, including Bmp5, Fgfr2, Jmjd1a, and Jun. Our study, for the first time, indicates that transgenically expressed human NanogP8 is biologically functional, but suggests that high levels of NanogP8 may disrupt normal developmental programs and inhibit tumor development by depleting stem cells.