Non-invasive prenatal testing for the diagnosis of congenital abnormalities: Insights from a large multicenter study in southern China

Although non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is widely used to detect fetal abnormalities, the results of NIPT vary by population, and data for the screening efficiency of NIPT positive predictive value (PPV) from different populations is limited. Herein, we retrospectively analyzed the NIPT results in a large multicenter study involving 52,855 pregnant women. Depending on gestational age, amniotic fluid or umbilical cord blood was extracted for karyotype and/or chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) in NIPT-positive patients, and the PPV and follow-up data were evaluated to determine its clinical value. Among the 52,855 cases, 754 were NIPT-positive, with a positivity rate of 1.4%. Karyotype analysis and/or CMA confirmed 323 chromosomal abnormalities, with a PPV of 45.1%. PPV for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), and copy number variations (CNVs) were 78.9, 35.3, 22.2, 36.9, and 32.9%, respectively. The PPVs for T21, T18, and T13 increased with age, whereas the PPVs for SCAs and CNVs had little correlation with age. The PPV was significantly higher in patients with advanced age and abnormal ultrasound. The NIPT results are affected by population characteristics. NIPT had a high PPV for T21 and a low PPV for T13 and T18, and screening for SCAs and CNVs showed clinical significance in southern China.

How diseases became "genetic" / Como as doenças se tornaram "genéticas"

Abstract This article examines the origins of the term "genetic disease." In the late 19 and early 20th century, an earlier idea that diseases that occur in families reflect a vague familiar "predisposition" was replaced by the view that such diseases have specific causes, while Mendelian genetics provided then clues to the patterns of their transmission. The genetictisation of inborn pathologies took a decisive turn with the redefinition, in 1959, of Down syndrome as a chromosomal anomaly, then the development of tests for the diagnosis of other hereditary pathologies. At that time, geneticists distinguished "hereditary" diseases that run in families, from "genetic" conditions that are the result of new mutations during the production of egg and sperm cells. In the latter case, the inborn impairment is produced by an anomaly in the genetic material of the cell, but is not hereditary, because it is not transmitted from one or both parents. In the late 20th and early 21st century, new genomic technologies blurred the distinction between hereditary and genetic impairments, extended the concept of genetic disease, and modified the experience of people living with such a disease.

Resumo O presente artigo tem o objetivo de examinar as origens do termo "doença genética. No final do século XIX e início do XX, a vaga ideia que a doença manifesta entre familiares refletia uma "predisposição" familiar, foi substituída pela visão que essas doenças possuem causas específicas, enquanto a genética mendeliana forneceu as pistas para os padrões de transmissão da doença. A genética das patologias congênitas deu uma guinada decisiva, em 1959, com a redefinição da Síndrome de Down como uma anomalia cromossômica e, depois, com o desenvolvimento de testes para o diagnóstico de outras patologias hereditárias. Naquela época, os geneticistas distinguiam doenças "hereditárias" como aquelas que acometiam os elementos de uma família, de condições "genéticas" que são o resultado de novas mutações ocorridas durante a produção dos óvulos e espermatozoides. Neste último caso, a deficiência inata é causada por uma anomalia do material genético da célula, porque não é transmitida por qualquer um ou ambos os pais. No final do século XX e início do XXI, as novas tecnologias genômicas obscureceram a distinção entre deficiências hereditária e a genética, estenderam o conceito da doença genética e modificaram a experiência das pessoas que vivem com esse tipo de doença.

Mosaic embryo transfer after oocyte in vitro maturation in combination with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)-first report of a euploid live birth.

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to describe a healthy life birth after a mosaic embryo transfer in oocyte in vitro maturation (IVM). METHODS: Patient received minimal stimulation, starting on day 3 after menstrual period. No hCG trigger was administered. Oocyte retrieval was performed and oocytes were matured for 30 h. After denuding, mature oocytes were inseminated by ICSI. Embryos were cultured until blastocyst stage and biopsied. RESULTS: One euploid embryo after array comprehensive genome hybridization (aCGH) was diagnostic. However, the next-generation sequencing (NGS) re-analysis showed that embryo was a mosaic for chromosome 13 and 21. Nevertheless, pregnancy ultrasound scans and non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT-Verifi-Illumina) indicated a normal fetus development. Finally, a healthy baby was born after 38 weeks. Its weight was 4480 g, head circumference 36 cm, and total length of 51 cm. To confirm that the baby was chromosomically normal, an NGS test was performed in buccal cells, a normal profile was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding confirmed that mosaic embryo transfer would bring a healthy offspring.

Diagnóstico prenatal de anomalías cromosómicas: Examen prenatal no invasivo / Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities: Noninvasive prenatal testing

El examen prenatal no invasivo es un método de tamizaje para encontrar a aquellas gestantes que tienen un riesgo de aneuploidía alto, específicamente para las trisomías 21, 18 y 13, y anomalías del cromosoma X. Requiere de una muestra de sangre periférica materna, en la que se analiza el ADN fetal libre circulante. En esta revisión detallamos los beneficios, desventajas e indicaciones del estudio.

Non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) is a screening method that identifies pregnant women with a high aneuploidy risk, specifically for trisomy 21, 18, 13, and chromosome X anomalies. NIPT analyzes free fetal DNA found in maternal blood. In this review, we describe the benefits, disadvantages and study indications.