Prediction of adrenal insufficiency after pituitary surgery: a retrospective study using beckman access cortisol assay.

PURPOSE: Identifying patients requiring glucocorticoid replacement therapy after pituitary surgery is challenging as the tests commonly used for the diagnosis of secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) are not recommended in the immediate postoperative period. There are controversial data on the role of postoperative days' morning cortisol, with no specific data for each cortisol assay. The aim of this study is to investigate the reliability of 8.00 a.m. cortisol of the first and second postoperative days in predicting SAI. METHODS: Data of patients underwent pituitary surgery in Humanitas Research Hospital in Italy, from March 2017 to August 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. Definitive diagnosis of SAI was made through ACTH test 1 µg six weeks after surgery. Cortisol was measured through Beckman Access Cortisol and the diagnosis of SAI was made if cortisol peak was below 14.8 µg/dL (408 nmol/L) at 30 or 60 min after stimulus. RESULTS: Of the sixty-four patients enrolled, seven developed SAI. The ROC curves demonstrated that both first- and second-day postoperative 8.00 a.m. cortisol predict SAI (AUC 0.94 and 0.95, respectively). The optimal thresholds were 15.6 µg/dL (430.3 nmol/L; accuracy 89%) for the first day and 11.5 µg/dL (317.2 nmol/L, accuracy 81%) for the second day. Patients who developed SAI had larger tumors (p = 0.004) and lower fT4 (p = 0.038) before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians might rely on the first- and second- postoperative days 8.00 a.m. cortisol to identify patients to discharge with glucocorticoid replacement therapy waiting for the confirmation of SAI through the ACTH test.

Lessons, insights and newly developed tools emerging from behavioral phenotyping core facilities.

Scientific investigations, in general, and research in neuroscience, in particular, are becoming ever more complex and require the integration of different techniques. Behavioral assays, which are among the most frequently used methodologies in neuroscience, nowadays rely on advanced, sophisticated technologies that require proficient application. Therefore, behavioral core facilities are becoming essential support units, as they provide the specialized expert research services needed to conduct advanced neuroscience. We here review the lessons learned and insights gathered from managing behavioral core facilities in different academic research institutes. This review addresses several issues, including: the advantages of behavioral core facilities, considerations for establishing a behavioral core facility, and the methodological advances made through calibration and standardization of assay protocols and the development of new assays. Collectively, the review highlights the benefits of both working within and collaborating with behavioral core facility units and emphasizes the potential progress in neuro-phenotyping that such facilities provide.

Examining the prevalence of non-criteria anti-phospholipid antibodies in patients with anti-phospholipid syndrome: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and establish the prevalence of antibody positivity in assays not currently included in the APS classification criteria to detect antibodies directed against other phospholipids (PLs), PL binding proteins, coagulation factors and a mechanistic test for resistance of Annexin A5 (AnxA5) anticoagulant activity in APS and control populations. METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE using the key words APS, antiphospholipid antibodies, non-criteria, new assays, IgA anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, anti-Domain I, IgA anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibodies, antiphosphatidylserine, anti-phosphatidylethanolamine, anti-phosphatidic acid, antiprothrombin, antiphosphatidylserine-prothtombin, anti-vimentin/cardiolipin complex and Annexin A5 resistance. Studies that met inclusion criteria to describe prevalence of non-criteria aPLs in APS patients (n > 10), disease and healthy control subjects were systematically examined. RESULTS: We selected 16 retrospective studies of 1404 APS patients, 1839 disease control and 797 healthy controls. The highest prevalence of non-criteria aPLs in the largest number of patients with APS was found in IgA anti-ß2GPI studies (129/229, 56.3%), AnxA5R (87/163, 53.4%) and IgG anti-Domain I (241/548, 44.0%). CONCLUSION: Our finding of a significantly high prevalence of all non-criteria aPLs studied in patients with APS compared with controls was tempered by wide variation in sample size, retrospective collection, assay methodology and different determination of positivity. Therefore, prospective studies of sufficient size and appropriate methodology are required to evaluate the significance of these assays and their utility in the management of patients with APS.