Digital cholangioscopy-assisted, direct visualization-guided, radiation-free, endoscopic retrograde intervention for cholelithiasis: technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety.

BACKGROUND: Nonradiation, digital cholangioscope (DCS)-assisted endoscopic intervention for cholelithiasis has not been widely performed. For this study, we aimed to report the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of an established DCS-guided lithotomy procedure. METHODS: Data relating to biliary exploration, stone clearance, adverse events, and follow-up were obtained from 289 patients. The choledocholithiasis-related outcomes via the DCS-guided procedure were subsequently compared to those via conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). RESULTS: Biliary access was achieved in 285 patients. The technical success rate for the exploration of the common bile duct, the cystic stump, the hilar ducts, and secondary radicals was 100%. Moreover, the success rates were 98.4%, 61.7%, and 20.7%, for the exploration of the cystic duct, complete cystic duct, and gallbladder, respectively. Suspicious or confirmed suppurative cholecystitis, cholesterol polyps, and hyperplastic polyps were detected in 42, 23, and 5 patients, respectively. Stone clearance was achieved in one session in 285 (100%), 11 (100%), 13 (100%), 7 (100%), 6 (100%), and 3 (14.3%) patients with choledocholithiasis and hepatolithiasis, cystic duct stump stones, nondiffuse located intrahepatic lithiasis, a single cystic duct stone, a single gallbladder stone, and diffuse located intrahepatic lithiasis, respectively. Complete stone clearance for diffuse intrahepatic lithiasis was achieved in 19 (90.5%) patients, and fractioned re-lithotomy was performed in 16 (76.2%) patients. One patient developed mild acute cholangitis, and 12 developed mild pancreatitis. Stones recurred in one patient. Compared with conventional ERCP, DCS-guided lithotomy has the advantages of clearing difficult-to-treat choledocholithiasis and revealing concomitant biliary lesions, and this technique has fewer complications and a decreased risk of stone recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The technical profile, efficacy, and safety of nonradiation-guided and DCS-guided lithotomy are shown in this study. We provide a feasible modality for the endoscopic removal of cholelithiasis.

Radiation-free endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary adenoma: experience from a Chinese tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Conventional endoscopic papillectomy (ESP) for ampullary adenoma is performed as a hybrid endoscopy and fluoroscopy guided procedure. In this study, we report our preliminary experience of non-radiation ESP. METHODS: The present method includes endoscopic snare resection, non-radiation endoscopic biliary and pancreatic stenting and endoclipping. Data from ten patients who underwent non-radiation ESP due to ampullary adenoma were collected. Procedure details, adverse events and follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Complete resection was accomplished in all patients, with en bloc resection and piecemeal resection in nine and one patient(s), respectively. Both biliary and pancreatic stenting and biliary stenting alone were achieved in eight and two patients, respectively. Endoclipping was performed in all patients. Hyperleukocytosis and hyperamylasemia occurred in two and one patient(s), respectively. No other complications occurred. No lesion residual or recurrence occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation-free ESP can be technically feasible and safely executed by experienced endoscopists. Our study provides a novel strategy for endoscopic resection of major papilla adenoma.

Efficacy and safety of digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for common bile duct stones.Methods:Clinical data of patients who underwent digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation ERCP for common bile duct stones from May 2019 to September 2021 were reviewed. The baseline data, the success rate of cannulation, the one-time success rate of endoscopic stone removal, the operation time, total hospital stay, complications, and recurrence of bile duct stones were analyzed.Results:A total of 170 patients were included, and bile duct stones were detected in 156 (91.8%) patients with the long diameter of 7.7±4.1 mm under preoperative imaging examination. Bile duct stones were detected under choledochoscopy and were successfully removed by using digital cholangioscopy through non-radiation ERCP. The success rate of cannulation was 100.0% (170/170) . The one-time success rate of endoscopic stone removal was 96.5% (164/170), and 6 patients (3.5%) received secondary stone removal for large stones (long diameter>30 mm).The time of biliary exploration and whole non-radiation ERCP were 9.6±2.7 min (6-24 min) and 35.9±17.3 min (13-85 min), respectively. The total hospital stay was 6.3±2.2 days (5-10 days). Postoperative pancreatitis occurred in 3 patients (1.8%), all of whom were mild and resolved after symptomatic treatment. No recurrence of bile duct stones was seen in any patient over 1-month postoperative follow-up.Conclusion:Digital cholangioscopy-assisted non-radiation ERCP is safe and effective for common bile duct stones without ray exposure, which is worth of promotion.

Evaluation of a newly designed basket in non-radiation endoscopic lithotomy for common bile duct stones (with video) / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective:To evaluate a newly designed basket fit for digital cholangioscope in non-radiation endoscopic lithotomy for common bile duct stones.Methods:Seventy-eight patients who underwent non-radiation endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones at Zhongda Hospital Southeast University between February and October 2021 were enrolled in the randomized controlled trial, and were randomly assigned into the new basket group ( n=35) and the conventional basket group ( n=43) by drawing lots. Procedures of cholangioscope-based biliary exploration and stone removal by baskets, volume of water irrigation, time lengths of biliary exploration, stone removal and whole endoscopic procedure, and adverse events were compared. Results:Compared with the conventional basket group, the new basket group needed less biliary explorations (1.08±0.28 VS 2.30±0.51, t=-12.535, P<0.001), smaller volume of water irrigation (46.14±11.89 mL VS 78.62±10.09 mL, t=-13.052, P<0.001), and shorter time of biliary exploration and stone removal (9.69±2.97 min VS 12.67±2.51 min, t=-4.815, P<0.001) and whole endoscopic procedure (30.17±7.19 min VS 33.44±6.69 min, t=-2.076, P=0.041). The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups [5.7% (2/35) VS 11.6% (5/43), χ2=0.826, P=0.363]. Conclusion:This newly designed basket can facilitate digital cholangioscope-guided non-radiation endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones with the advantages of shorter operation time, less exploration time of choledochoscopy and smaller volume of water irrigation.

Nonradiation-to-endoscopist ERCP is non-inferior to standard ERCP.

BACKGROUND: Radiation exposure is inherently involved in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), which could cause radiation-induced injury to endoscopists with long-term exposure. Nonradiation ERCP has been applied to pregnant patients. Conceivably, the same techniques could be used to benefit endoscopists. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nonradiation-to-endoscopist (NRE) ERCP, compared with standard ERCP. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted from August 2010 to December 2015. Patients aged 18-90 years and with choledocholithiasis (< 15 mm) or distal biliary stricture were eligible. Pre-ERCP evaluation with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography was mandatory. To overcome selection bias, we performed 1:2 match using propensity score matching (PSM) between NRE and standard groups. The primary endpoint was overall ERCP success rate. Secondary endpoints were cannulation success rate, stone clearance rate, complication rate, and duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 329 patients met inclusion criteria. After PSM, 73 patients were included in the NRE group and 146 in the standard group. The ERCP overall success rate for NRE and standard groups was equivalent (94.5% vs. 93.2%, P = 0.70). There was no difference in cannulation success rates between the two groups (95.6% vs. 97.8%, P = 0.39). A total of 88.3% of patients in the NRE group and 93.9% of patients in the standard group had stones cleared at initial ERCP (P = 0.57). No difference in overall stone clearance rate between the two groups (95.0% vs. 93.9%, P = 0.77) was found after second ERCP. The complication rate (1.4% vs. 1.4%, P = 1.00) and hospital duration (8.3 ± 5.1 vs. 10.2 ± 8.8 days, P = 0.07) were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although technically demanding, NRE-ERCP is both safe and feasible in selected patients compared with standard ERCP.

Radiation-free digital cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy for large common bile duct stones: feasibility and technical notes.

AIMS: Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for large common bile duct (CBD) stones is facilitated by digital cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy, it is performed by fluoroscopy guidance. Here, we report our experience of non-radiation ERCP for large CBD stones using digital cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy. METHODS: Sixteen patients with large CBD stones underwent non-radiation digital cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy and lithotomy. Data relevant to procedure details, adverse events, and short-term follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Biliary access was achieved in all patients using standard guidewire-assisted cannulation, double-guidewire technique, and transpancreatic precut in twelve, two, and two patients, respectively. Balloons of 10 mm, 8 mm, and 6 mm in diameter were applied for EPBD in 8, 2, and 6 patients, respectively. Complete stone removal in one session was achieved in all patients. One round of laser lithotripsy was needed for stone ≤ 25 mm, and three-to-five rounds were needed for stones > 25 mm or multiple stones. One or two clips were used for endoscopic clipping. The time lengths of biliary access, digital cholangioscopy-assisted laser lithotripsy and stone extraction, and whole procedure were 3.5 ± 3.2 (0.5-12) minutes, 52.5 ± 30.6 (45-97) minutes, and 76 ± 23.3 (58-106) minutes, respectively. Asymptomatic hyperleukocytose, hyperamylasemia, and mild pancreatitis were present in 1, 2, and 1 patient(s), respectively. No other complications occurred. No cholangitis or recurrent CBD stones were observed. CONCLUSION: Non-radiation digital cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy is technically feasible and can be safely performed for endoscopic management of large CBD stones.

The emerging role of non-radiation endoscopic management of biliary tract disorders.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has evolved from a diagnostic and therapeutic technique into a therapeutic-centered modality for managing biliary disorders. Despite its many therapeutic benefits, radiation exposure from ERCP fluoroscopy is of concern and should be minimized as much as possible. Although the use of personal equipment offers significant protection against radiation, attention has been given to the development of non-radiation-based ERCP techniques. To this end, digital cholangioscopy and endoscopic ultrasound-assisted ERCP have emerged as alternatives to standard ERCP. Both techniques have sufficient feasibility and potential diagnostic accuracy to eliminate the need for fluoroscopy. Here we discuss the advances in non-radiation ERCP techniques and their role in the management of biliary stones.

Uncomplicated common bile duct stone removal guided by cholangioscopy versus conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have reported the possibility of therapeutic ERCP without fluoroscopy, more robust documentation of fluoroscopy-free common bile duct stone (CBDS) clearance is needed. Technically, "digital cholangioscopy" (DCS) may be used to confirm CBDS clearance. We aimed to compare the feasibility, safety, and radiation exposure between patients with CBDS undergoing stone removal by DCS and conventional ERCP (cERCP). METHODS: Fifty (50) consecutive patients with a CBDS size < 15 mm underwent DCS (SpyGlass DS Direct Visualization System, Boston Scientific, Marlboro, MA, USA) between December 2015 and October 2016. Of 202 consecutive patients undergoing cERCP during the same time frame, 50 matched pairs were created using propensity score matching analysis. In the DCS group, patients underwent biliary cannulation and CBDS removal without fluoroscopy followed by DCS to confirm complete CBDS clearance. A final occlusion cholangiogram was performed as the current standard of care to confirm CBDS clearance. RESULTS: Cannulation success rates were similar between the DCS and cERCP groups (98 vs. 98%). By intention-to-treat analysis, CBDS clearance in the DCS and cERCP groups was not different (90 vs. 98%; p = 0.20, respectively). DCS had successful CBDS removal in 45 cases, whereas 5 (10%) failed for clearance by DCS due to technical limitations. Adverse events were not different between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of uncomplicated CBDS, our data confirmed the feasibility of DCS for CBDS clearance as it showed efficacy and safety comparable to those of cERCP. Although certain conditions may limit its effectiveness, DCS offers the ability to perform CBDS clearance without the need for fluoroscopy unit and can avoid radiation exposure while ERCP under fluoroscopy remains the current standard of care in patients with CBDS.

Facile and Nonradiation Pretreated Membrane as a High Conductive Separator for Li-Ion Batteries.

Polyolefin membranes are widely used as separators in commercialized Li-ion batteries. They have less polarized surfaces compared with polarized molecules of electrolyte, leading to a poor wetting state for separators. Radiation pretreatments are often adopted to solve such a problem. Unfortunately, they can only activate several nanometers deep from the surface, which limits the performance improvement. Here we report a facile and scalable method to polarize polyolefin membranes via a chemical oxidation route. On the surfaces of pretreated membrane, layers of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(acrylic acid) can easily be coated, thus resulting in a high Li-ion conductivity of the membrane. Assembled with this decorated separator in button cells, both high-voltage (Li1.2Mn0.54Co0.13Ni0.13O2) and moderate-voltage (LiFePO4) cathode materials show better electrochemical performances than those assembled with pristine polyolefin separators.

Role of radiation and non-radiation factors on the development of coronary heart disease in the Chornobyl clean-up workers: epidemiological study results. / Vplyv radiacijnogo j neradiacijnyh faktoriv na rozvytok ishemichnoi' hvoroby sercja v uchasnykiv likvidacii' naslidkiv avarii' na ChAES. Rezul''taty epidemiologichnyh doslidzhen''.

Objective. The objective of this study was to establish the risks for coronary heart disease in the Chornobyl clean-up workers with regard to a whole-body external radiation dose and non-radiation (biological, social-and-hygienic and behavioral) factors. Materials and methods. Risk-analysis was based on the cohort of the Chornobyl male clean-up workers 1986-1987 (8,625 men, including 3,623 with available whole-body external doses). Data of clinical-and-epidemiological registry, National Research Centre for Radiation Medicine were used for 1992-2013 monitoring period. We used the internal control group with radiation doses less than 0.05 Gy. Results. Statistically significant radiation risks in the Chornobyl clean-up workers were established for the coronary heart disease at doses 0.15-0.249 Gy, 0.25-0.99 Gy, 1 Gy and more (dose group 0.15-0.249 Gy RRY=1.9 (1.2; 3.1), ERR=4.6 (1.5; 14.9) Gy-1, EAR=64.2 cases per 1000 person-years, Gy); among exposed people aged 40 years and older - at doses 0.5-0.99 Gy (RRY=1.4 (1.05; 1.81), ERR=0.5 (0.03; 1.1) Gy-1, EAR=30.5 cases per 1000 person-years, Gy). Statistically significant risks for the disease under consideration were also identified with regard to non-radiation factors (smoking, improper physical training, adverse working conditions, diseases etc; age and psychoemotional overstrain were of a particular impact). Non-radiation factors are at most responsible for development of coronary heart disease. For this reason the control of potential confounding factors is required to assess the effect of the radiation factor both at a stage of comparison groups selection and analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Non-radiation endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of choledocholithiasis during pregnancy.

Gallstone diseases are common during pregnancy. In most cases, patients are asymptomatic and do not require any treatment. However, choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, and gallstone pancreatitis may potentially become life-threatening for both mother and fetus and often require urgent intervention. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become the standard technique for removing common bile duct stones, it is associated with ionizing radiation that could carry teratogenic risk. Non-radiation ERCP (NR-ERCP) is reported to be effective without incurring this risk. Two techniques have been described to confirm bile duct cannulation: bile aspiration and image guidance. With bile aspiration, biliary cannulation is confirmed by applying suction to the cannula to yield bile, thus confirming an intrabiliary position. Image guidance involves using ultrasound or direct visualization (choledochoscopy) to confirm selective biliary cannulation or duct clearance. Once cannulation is achieved, the stones are removed using standard ERCP techniques and tools. Case series and retrospective studies have reported success rates of up to 90% for NR-ERCP with complication rates similar to standard ERCP. Pregnancy outcomes are not adversely affected by NR-ERCP, but whether the avoidance of radiation carries benefit for the baby is unknown. Prospective comparative trials are lacking. NR-ERCP is technically demanding and should be attempted only by skilled biliary endoscopists in properly equipped and staffed health-care institutions, in a multidisciplinary setting.

Non-radiation endoscopic removal of common bile duct stone assisted with abdominal ultrasonography in a pregnant patient.

A common bile duct stone was detected in a pregnant patient who was in her second trimester. Avoiding the use of fluoroscopy, abdominal ultrasonography-assisted endoscopic removal of the stone was successful.

Radiation and non-radiation factors impact on development of cerebrovascular diseases in the Chornobyl clean-up workers. The epidemiological study results.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the cerebrovascular disease risks in the Chornobyl clean-up workers with regard to whole-body external dose and non-radiation factors i.e. biological, social-and-hygienic, behavioral ones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Risk-analysis was based on the cohort of the Chornobyl male clean-up workers of 1986-1987 period (8625 men including 3623 with known whole-body external radiation dose values). Data from the Clinical-and-epidemiological registry, National Research Centre for Radiation Medicine were used. Observation period was since 1992 till 2010. We have used the approach with the internal control group with radiation doses less than 0.05 or 0.1 Gy. RESULTS: The statistically significant radiation risks were established for the chronic forms of cerebrovascular disease at doses 0.5 Gy and higher, for some forms of the disease in certain dose-age strata i.e. 0.25 Gy and more. Statistically significant non-radiation risks for cerebrovascular disease were recorded with regard to age, psychoemotional stress, alcohol abuse, malnutrition, smoking, harmful working conditions etc. Role of age as a confounding factor was analyzed under the assessing of radiation risks with Mantel-Haenszel method application to improve the estimates of radiation effects.