Co-designing planning interventions to facilitate participation in mail-out bowel cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Population mail-out bowel cancer screening programs save lives through prevention and early detection; however, their effectiveness is constrained by low participation rates. Many non-participants are "intenders"; that is, they intend to screen but fail to do so, often forgetting or procrastinating. This study aimed to co-design interventions to increase screening participation among intenders in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. METHODS: Three semi-structured interviews, and one online cross-sectional survey, were conducted between August 2021 and December 2022. Interviews with people who had completed and returned their latest screening kit ("completers") were first conducted to identify the planning strategies they had used. Using survey data, logistic regressions were conducted to analyse strategies predictive of participants having returned their latest bowel cancer screening kit. Then, intenders were interviewed to explore their opinions of these strategies and worked with researchers to adapt these strategies into prototype interventions to facilitate screening participation. All interviews were analysed using the framework approach of codebook thematic analysis. RESULTS: Interview participants who returned their kit shared their effective planning strategies, such as putting the kit in a visible place or by the toilet, planning a time at home to complete the kit, and using reminders. Survey participants who reported using such strategies were more likely to have completed their screening kit compared to those who did not. Prototype interventions developed and endorsed by intenders included providing a prompt to place the kit or a sticker near the toilet as a reminder, a deadline for kit return, the option to sign up for reminders, and a bag to store the sample in the fridge. CONCLUSIONS: These novel, consumer-led interventions that are built upon the needs and experience of screening invitees provide potential solutions to improve participation in population bowel cancer screening.

Decreased Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests and Delayed Medical Presentation for Colorectal Cancer during the Initial COVID-19 Pandemic Period: A Single-center Experience.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the examination and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) and on the behaviors of patients and practitioners. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the CRC patients who presented to our department between April 2019 and March 2021 and underwent surgery. Clinical presentation of CRC and time from symptom onset to medical presentation were compared between the control (April 2019 to March 2020, n=124) and COVID-19 pandemic periods (April 2020 to March 2021, n=111). Results: Two hundred and thirty-five patients were reviewed. The rate of positive fecal occult blood tests was significantly lower during the COVID-19 pandemic period (13.5 vs. 25.0%, P = 0.027). Among the symptomatic patients who had melena and abdominal symptoms, the time from symptom onset to medical presentation was significantly longer during the COVID-19 period (115 vs. 31 days, P < 0.001). In addition, the interval between presenting to a practitioner and being referred to our department was similar between the two periods (19 vs. 13 days, P = 0.092). There were no significant differences in the stage of cancer between the two periods. The rate of preoperative sub-obstruction was significantly higher during the COVID-19 period (41.4 vs 23.4%, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between two periods. Conclusions: Hesitation to seek examination and treatment for CRC was observed in patients but not in practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic period. The prognosis did not change.

Effectiveness of colonoscopy, immune fecal occult blood testing, and risk-graded screening strategies in colorectal cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors, and early screening is crucial to improving the survival rate of patients. The combination of colonoscopy and immune fecal occult blood detection has garnered significant attention as a novel method for CRC screening. Colonoscopy and fecal occult blood tests, when combined, can improve screening accuracy and early detection rates, thereby facilitating early intervention and treatment. However, certain risks and costs accompany it, making the establishment of a risk classification model crucial for accurate classification and management of screened subjects. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of colonoscopy, immune fecal occult blood test (FIT), and risk-graded screening strategies in CRC screening. METHODS: Based on the randomized controlled trial of CRC screening in the population conducted by our hospital May 2020 to May 2023, participants who met the requirements were randomly assigned to a colonoscopy group, an FIT group, or a graded screening group at a ratio of 1:2:2 (after risk assessment, the high-risk group received colonoscopy, the low-risk group received an FIT test, and the FIT-positive group received colonoscopy). The three groups received CRC screening with different protocols, among which the colonoscopy group only received baseline screening, and the FIT group and the graded screening group received annual follow-up screening based on baseline screening. The primary outcome was the detection rate of advanced tumors, including CRC and advanced adenoma. The population participation rate, advanced tumor detection rate, and colonoscopy load of the three screening programs were compared. RESULTS: A total of 19373 subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled, including 8082 males (41.7%) and 11291 females (58.3%). The mean age was 60.05 ± 6.5 years. Among them, 3883 patients were enrolled in the colonoscopy group, 7793 in the FIT group, and 7697 in the graded screening group. Two rounds of follow-up screening were completed in the FIT group and the graded screening group. The graded screening group (89.2%) and the colonoscopy group (42.3%) had the lowest overall screening participation rates, while the FIT group had the highest (99.3%). The results of the intentional analysis showed that the detection rate of advanced tumors in the colonoscopy group was greater than that of the FIT group [2.76% vs 2.17%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.65, P = 0.037]. There was no significant difference in the detection rate of advanced tumors between the colonoscopy group and the graded screening group (2.76% vs 2.35%, OR = 1.9, 95%CI: 0.93-1.51, P = 0.156), as well as between the graded screening group and the FIT group (2.35% vs 2.17%, OR = 1.09%, 95%CI: 0.88-1.34, P = 0.440). The number of colonoscopy examinations required for each patient with advanced tumors was used as an index to evaluate the colonoscopy load during population screening. The graded screening group had the highest colonoscopy load (15.4 times), followed by the colonoscopy group (10.2 times), and the FIT group had the lowest (7.8 times). CONCLUSION: A hierarchical screening strategy based on CRC risk assessment is feasible for screening for CRC in the population. It can be used as an effective supplement to traditional colonoscopy and FIT screening programs.

Utility of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health issue where early detection is crucial for improving treatment outcomes and survival rates. This comprehensive review assesses the utility of stool-based tests in CRC screening, including traditional fecal occult blood tests (FOBT), both chemical (gFOBT) and immunochemical techniques (FIT), as well as multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) as a novel and promising biomarker. The advancements, limitations and the impact of false positives and negatives of these methods are examined. The review analyzed various studies on current screening methods, focusing on laboratory tests and biomarkers. Findings indicate that while FIT and mt-sDNA tests offer enhanced sensitivity and specificity over traditional guaiac-based FOBT, they also come with higher costs and potential for increased false positives. FIT shows better patient adherence due to its ease to use, but incorrect usage and interpretation of FOBT can lead to significant diagnostic errors. In conclusion, despite the improvements in FOBT methods like FIT in CRC detection, careful consideration of each method's benefits and drawbacks is essential. Effective CRC screening programs should combine various methods tailored to specific population needs, aiming for early detection and reduced mortality rates.

Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Regarding Colorectal Carcinoma Screening Among Healthcare Personnel.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a rising issue worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality rates. It is the third most common cause of death globally. Early diagnosis can lead to prevention and treatment, making it crucial for healthcare professionals to have proper knowledge about CRC screening. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the level of awareness, identify knowledge gaps, and update the knowledge of healthcare workers. METHODS:  This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from May to October 2023, in multiple tertiary care hospitals of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Responses were collected manually through a designed proforma of questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 164 participants (137 male and 27 female) took part in our study. Among the participants, 92.1% (n = 151) were aware that colonoscopy is used for CRC screening. Other screening methods known to them included a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) (65.9%, n = 108), flexible sigmoidoscopy (48.2%, n = 79), stool DNA test (31.1%, n = 51), and virtual colonoscopy (34.1%, n = 56). Only 6.1% (n = 10) routinely recommended CRC screening for all patients, 22.6% (n = 37) recommended it occasionally, and 71.3% (n = 117) rarely or never recommended it. Regarding factors influencing the recommendation of CRC screening, 83.5% (n = 137) cited family history of CRC as the major factor, followed by patient age (68.3%, n = 112), availability of screening facilities (46.3%, n = 76), patient's overall health status (37.2%, n = 61), and patient's preference (20.7%, n = 34). CONCLUSION: This study concluded that only a small proportion of healthcare personnel regularly recommend CRC screening. In addition, a small proportion are familiar with CRC screening guidelines, although most are well-informed about the various investigations used for screening.

Early colorectal cancer screening-no time to lose.

In this editorial, we comment on the article entitled "Stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer through diagnostic route: Who should be screened?" by Agatsuma et al. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is emerging as an important health issue as its incidence continues to rise globally, adversely affecting the quality of life. Although the public has become more aware of CRC prevention, most patients lack screening awareness. Some poor lifestyle practices can lead to CRC and symptoms can appear in the early stages of CRC. However, due to the lack of awareness of the disease, most of the CRC patients are diagnosed already at an advanced stage and have a poor prognosis.

Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy and biopsy results in people undergoing colonoscopy due to positive fecal occult blood test.

Objectives: Screening programs are important for the early detection of colorectal cancer, which is one of the causes of high morbidity and mortality. In this study, we investigated the colonoscopy results, the incidence of adenoma and cancer, and the relationship between test results and cancer in individuals with a positive fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening. Material and Methods: Within the scope of the colorectal cancer screening program, colonoscopy was requested for individuals aged 50-70 years who applied to our outpatient clinic with a positive fecal occult blood test. The results were collected and analyzed. Results: The results of the colonoscopy could be obtained in only 237 (56.43%) of the 420 patients who were referred for a colonoscopy because of a positive fecal occult blood test. Colonoscopy results were normal in 15 (6.33%), benign anal disease in 64 (27%), benign colonic disease in 12 (5.06%) and polyp + adenocarcinoma in 146 (61.61%). Pathology results were benign polyp in 37 (15.61%), adenomatous polyp in 86 (36.29%) and adenocarcinoma in 23 (9.71%). Quantitative test results were higher in the adenomatous polyp + adenocarcinoma group and statistically significant (p= 0.03). Conclusion: Individuals with positive fecal occult blood tests, especially those with high quantitative test results, should be encouraged to have a colonoscopy, and they should be warned about the high probability of adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancer.

Faecal immunochemical tests can improve colonoscopy triage in patients with iron deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Use of the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to triage patients with iron deficiency (ID) for colonoscopy due to suspected colorectal cancer (CRC) may improve distribution of colonoscopic resources. We reviewed the diagnostic performance of FIT for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia, including CRC and advanced pre-cancerous neoplasia (APCN), in patients with ID, with or without anaemia. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of three databases for studies comprising of patients with ID, with or without anaemia, completing a quantitative FIT within six months prior to colonoscopy, where test performance was compared against the reference standard colonoscopy. Random effects meta-analyses determined the diagnostic performance of FIT for advanced colorectal neoplasia. RESULTS: Nine studies were included on a total of n=1761 patients with ID, reporting FIT positivity thresholds between 4-150 µg haemoglobin/g faeces. Only one study included a non-anaemic ID (NAID) cohort. FIT detected CRC and APCN in ID patients with 90.7 % and 49.3 % sensitivity, and 81.0 % and 82.4 % specificity, respectively. FIT was 88.0 % sensitive and 83.4 % specific for CRC in patients with ID anaemia at a FIT positivity threshold of 10 µg haemoglobin/g faeces. CONCLUSIONS: FIT shows high sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia and may be used to triage those with ID anaemia where colonoscopic resources are limited, enabling those at higher risk of CRC to be prioritised for colonoscopy. There is a need for further research investigating the diagnostic performance of FIT in NAID patients.

Predictive values of an immunological fecal occult blood test for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer compared using colonoscopy in symptomatic patients in Yaounde (Cameroon).

INTRODUCTION: The predictive value of immunological fecal occult blood (iFOB) testing for the screening of colorectal cancer has been well described in the Western world. However, its relevance in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is not well evaluated. It could be altered by the other causes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding such as parasitic infections. The aim of this study was to highlight the performance of an iFOB test for the prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) during colonoscopy in SSA. METHODOLOGY: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study in two digestive endoscopic centers of Yaoundé (Cameroon) from the 1st July to the 31 November 2022. Patients presenting with an indication for colonoscopy without any overt gastrointestinal bleeding were included. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. All consenting patients underwent a qualitative immunologic occult test through the iFOB test before colonoscopy. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 software. The performance of the iFOB test for the diagnosis of CRC during colonoscopy was evaluated in terms of sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: We included 103 patients during the study period with a male predominance and a sex ratio of 1.7. The median age [IQR] was 52 [38-65] years (range 1 - 84 years). The most common colonoscopic lesions were polyps in 23 patients (22.3%), CRC in 17 patients (16.5%) and hemorrhoids in 15 patients (14.6%). Patients testing positive for iFOB test accounted for 43.7% (45 patients). Among these patients, 31.1% (14 patients) had a CRC. The Se of the occult blood test for CRC detection was calculated to be 82.3% (95%CI: 56.7-96.2); the Sp was 63.9% (95% CI: 53-74); the PPV was 31.1% (95% CI: 24-39) and the NPV was 94.8% (95% CI: 86.6-98.1). CONCLUSION: The iFOB test has a good NPV, but a poor PPV for the diagnosis of CRC in our study.

Barreras y facilitadores del acceso al tamizaje de cáncer colorrectal / Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening access

Resumen Introducción : El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es un pro blema de salud a nivel global. En el sector público de Bahía Blanca, el tamizaje de CCR es oportunista, por solicitud de sangre oculta en materia fecal (SOMF). El objetivo de este trabajo es describir el acceso al tamiza je de CCR de la población con cobertura pública exclu siva que reside en el área programática 2 de la ciudad entre 2019 y 2021, y relevar las barreras y facilitadores que lo determinan. Métodos : Se estimó la tasa de uso anual y acumula da de SOMF. Las barreras y facilitadores se relevaron a través de 41 entrevistas individuales semi-estructuradas al personal de salud del área programática, el Hospital Municipal, Secretaría de Salud y usuarios/no usuarios del sistema. Resultados : La tasa acumulada de uso de SOMF en el período fue 4.8%. Entre las barreras al tamizaje per cibidas se destacan: la dificultad en el acceso a estudios de mayor complejidad para pacientes con SOMF+, el desconocimiento y falta de percepción del CCR como un problema de salud por parte de la población y la baja adherencia de los profesionales a los lineamientos. La territorialidad y el vínculo de los centros de salud con la población, y la predisposición de usuarios y profesio nales a incorporar el tamizaje surgen como facilitadores del mismo. Conclusiones : El relevamiento de las barreras orien tará el diseño de estrategias adaptadas al contexto que permitan en el futuro reforzar el tamizaje.

Abstract Introduction : Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global health problem. In the public sector of Bahía Blanca, CRC screening is opportunistic, through the request of fecal occult blood test (FOBT). The objective of this study is to describe access to CRC screening for the population with exclusive public coverage residing in the program matic area 2 of the city between 2019 and 2021, and to identify the barriers and facilitators that determine it. Methods : The annual and cumulative usage rate was estimated based on the number of patients who requested FOBT. The barriers and facilitators were studied through 41 semi-structured individual inter views to healthcare staff from the area, the Municipal Hospital, Health Secretariat and users/non-users of the system. Results : The cumulative usage rate of FOBT during the period was less than 5%. Among the perceived bar riers to screening, we found: the difficulties in accessing more complex studies for patients with positive FOBT, the lack of population awareness and perception of CRC as a health problem, the low adherence of professionals to guidelines. The territoriality and link of health centers with the population, as well as the willingness of users and professionals to incorporate screening, emerge as facilitators. Conclusion : The identification of barriers and facilita tors will allow the design of context-adapted strategies that will strengthen screening in the future.

Lack of social support, gender and colorectal cancer screening participation across Europe: How do screening programmes mitigate the effect of social support for men and women?

This study investigates how a lack of social support differentially affects men and women's colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation, considering different screening strategies implemented across European countries. Although health sociology has stressed gender differences in social support and its effects on health behaviours, this was overlooked by cancer screening research. Using a data set of 65,961 women and 55,602 men in 31 European countries, we analysed the effect of social support variables on CRC screening uptake. We found that living alone and lower perceived social support were associated with lower screening uptake for both men and women. These effects were, however, stronger among men. Population-based screening programmes mitigated these effects, particularly for women, but not for men living alone. In countries with opportunistic screening programmes, social support variables remained associated with screening uptake. We conclude that cancer screening interventions should pay attention to social support and its gender-differentiated effects.

Feasibility of opportunistic colorectal cancer screening of hospitalized patients in tertiary care and community hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Population screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) remains low, requiring alternative approaches for increasing participation. Opportunistic screening of hospitalized patients may aid in increasing uptake rates. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether inpatients can be recruited for opportunistic CRC screening using fecal immunochemical testing (FIT). METHODS: Inpatient charts were prospectively reviewed for study eligibility on admission of patients to the medical wards of 3 hospitals in Winnipeg, Canada. Eligible patients were approached for participation and consent. Inoculated FIT specimen collection tubes were sent to the hospital laboratory for testing. Patients with positive FIT results received a follow-up colonoscopy. RESULTS: In total, 1542 inpatient charts were screened for eligibility; 53 patients were identified for enrollment (51.9% were male; median age, 59 years), of whom 13 patients consented to participate but only 7 provided a stool specimen. One of those 7 patients had a positive FIT result. The overall screening rate was low, at 0.45%. The primary reason for exclusion of patients was age (outside of the range of 50-75 years), followed by patients having recent gastrointestinal bleeding and/or known intestinal diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that it is infeasible to recruit inpatients for opportunistic CRC screening in routine clinical practice.

Asymptomatic intestinal tuberculosis of the terminal ileum diagnosed on colonoscopy: a case report and literature review.

Objective: Colonoscopy is useful in diagnosing intestinal tuberculosis. However, the terminal ileum is generally not examined during routine colonoscopy. Therefore, even with colonoscopy, the diagnosis can be missed in patients with lesions confined to the terminal ileum. Herein, we report the case of an asymptomatic patient with intestinal tuberculosis, in whom a colonoscope insertion into the terminal ileum led to the diagnosis. Patient: An asymptomatic 71-year-old man visited our hospital for a colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test. Results: Colonoscopy revealed diffuse edematous and erosive mucosa in the terminal ileum. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was detected by polymerase chain reaction and culture of biopsy specimens from the erosions, leading to the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis. The patient was treated with antitubercular agents for 6 months, and a follow-up colonoscopy revealed healing of the lesions. Conclusion: Asymptomatic intestinal tuberculosis may occasionally be detected on colonoscopy following a positive fecal occult blood test and is sometimes confined to the terminal ileum. Therefore, clinicians should consider intestinal tuberculosis in the differential diagnosis of the causes of positive fecal occult blood test results and perform colonoscopies, including observation of the terminal ileum.

[Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening access]. / Barreras y facilitadores del acceso al tamizaje de cáncer colorrectal.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global health problem. In the public sector of Bahía Blanca, CRC screening is opportunistic, through the request of fecal occult blood test (FOBT). The objective of this study is to describe access to CRC screening for the population with exclusive public coverage residing in the programmatic area 2 of the city between 2019 and 2021, and to identify the barriers and facilitators that determine it. METHODS: The annual and cumulative usage rate was estimated based on the number of patients who requested FOBT. The barriers and facilitators were studied through 41 semi-structured individual interviews to healthcare staff from the area, the Municipal Hospital, Health Secretariat and users/non-users of the system. RESULTS: The cumulative usage rate of FOBT during the period was less than 5%. Among the perceived barriers to screening, we found: the difficulties in accessing more complex studies for patients with positive FOBT, the lack of population awareness and perception of CRC as a health problem, the low adherence of professionals to guidelines. The territoriality and link of health centers with the population, as well as the willingness of users and professionals to incorporate screening, emerge as facilitators. CONCLUSION: The identification of barriers and facilitators will allow the design of context-adapted strategies that will strengthen screening in the future.

Introducción: El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es un problema de salud a nivel global. En el sector público de Bahía Blanca, el tamizaje de CCR es oportunista, por solicitud de sangre oculta en materia fecal (SOMF). El objetivo de este trabajo es describir el acceso al tamizaje de CCR de la población con cobertura pública exclusiva que reside en el área programática 2 de la ciudad entre 2019 y 2021, y relevar las barreras y facilitadores que lo determinan. Métodos: Se estimó la tasa de uso anual y acumulada de SOMF. Las barreras y facilitadores se relevaron a través de 41 entrevistas individuales semi-estructuradas al personal de salud del área programática, el Hospital Municipal, Secretaría de Salud y usuarios/no usuarios del sistema. Resultados: La tasa acumulada de uso de SOMF en el período fue 4.8%. Entre las barreras al tamizaje percibidas se destacan: la dificultad en el acceso a estudios de mayor complejidad para pacientes con SOMF+, el desconocimiento y falta de percepción del CCR como un problema de salud por parte de la población y la baja adherencia de los profesionales a los lineamientos. La territorialidad y el vínculo de los centros de salud con la población, y la predisposición de usuarios y profesionales a incorporar el tamizaje surgen como facilitadores del mismo. Conclusiones: El relevamiento de las barreras orientará el diseño de estrategias adaptadas al contexto que permitan en el futuro reforzar el tamizaje.

Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT): Considerations on Sampling and Markers (Hb and Hb/Hp Complex) of Fecal Occult Blood (FOB).

BACKGROUND/AIM: Formal demonstration of the efficacy of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) in reducing CRC incidence and mortality is still missing. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of sampling and FIT marker in the recently implemented CRC screening program in Finland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Because only the index test [FIT hemoglobin (Hb)]-positive subjects are verified by the reference test (colonoscopy), the new screening program is subject to verification bias that precludes estimating the diagnostic accuracy (DA) indicators. A previously published study (5) with 100% biopsy verification of colonoscopy referral subjects (called validation cohort, n=300) was used to derive these missing DA estimates. Two points of concern were addressed: i) only one-day sample tested, and ii) only the Hb component (but not Hb/Hp complex) was analyzed by FIT. RESULTS: The estimated DA of one-sample testing for Hb in the screening setting had a very low sensitivity (SE) (12.5%; 95%CI=12.3-12.7) for adenomas, with AUC=0.560 (for CRC, AUC=0.950). Testing three samples for Hb improved SE to 19.4% (95%CI=19.1-19.7%) but had little effect on overall DA (AUC=0.590). For adenomas, one-sample testing for Hb and Hb/Hp complex provided higher SE than three-sample testing for Hb (SE 20.6%; 95%CI=20.3-21.0), and the best SE was reached when two samples were tested for Hb and Hb/Hp complex (SE 47.5%; 95%CI=46.9-48.1%) (AUC=0.730). CONCLUSION: The strategy of the current CRC screening could be significantly improved by testing two consecutive samples by Hb and Hb/Hp complex, instead of stand-alone Hb testing of one sample.

Identifying the best cutoff value of the fecal occult blood immunochemical test in the detection of advanced and neoplastic colorectal lesions.

Objective: Screening is an effective tool for detecting colorectal lesions in asymptomatic subjects. There is a positive correlation between fecal immunochemical test (FIT) values and the size of tumors. Despite the efficacy of screening, the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains low. The primary objective was to evaluate the best FIT cutoff value for detecting advanced adenomas and CRC among individuals at average risk in a country with a high incidence and morbidity from CRC. Methods: This observational and prospective study analyzed consecutive cases in 1461 asymptomatic subjects with a positive FIT (≥ 100 ng hemoglobin [Hb]/mL) referred for colonoscopy (2012-2015) at a tertiary center in Uruguay. Results: Colorectal lesions were detected in 35.3% (516/1461) of cases, with a mean age of 62.8 ± 8.3 years. About 53.2% were men and 65.1% of the tumors were located in the left side of the colon. The size of the lesion and FIT values (p = 0.001) were positively correlated. Laterally spreading tumors predominated in the right colon (586 ng Hb/mL; 95% Confidence interval [CI] 443.4-760). One hundred and thirty-five (26%) lesions were advanced adenomas (15 ± 6.7 mm); 694.6 ng/mL; 95% CI 632.4-756.9). The highest diagnostic yield (0.5112) for advanced adenomas was at a FIT level of 400 ng Hb/mL (accuracy 88.6%). There were significant differences in FIT values early and advanced CRC (927 ng/mL; [95% CI: 637-1082] vs. 1453 [95% CI: 1352-1594; p = 0.001]). Conclusion: A FIT value of 400 ng Hb/mL was the best diagnostic yield to detect advanced adenomas and CRC. This value is useful during the COVID-19 pandemic as it allows prioritization of colonoscopy to those most at risk of significant disease, thus reducing risks to both patients and healthcare workers.

Objetivo: El cribado es una herramienta eficaz para detectar lesiones colorrectales en sujetos asintomáticos. Existe una correlación positiva entre los valores de la prueba inmunoquímica fecal (FIT) y el tamaño de los tumores. A pesar de la eficacia del cribado, la detección del cáncer colorrectal (CCR) sigue siendo baja. El objetivo principal fue evaluar el mejor valor de corte FIT para detectar adenomas avanzados y CCR entre personas con riesgo promedio en un país con alta incidencia y morbilidad por CCR. Métodos: Este estudio observacional y prospectivo analizó 1461 sujetos asintomáticos con FIT positivo (≥ 100 ng de hemoglobina [Hb]/mL) remitidos para colonoscopia (2012-2015) en un centro terciario en Uruguay. Resultados: Se detectaron lesiones colorrectales en el 35,3% (516/1461) de los casos, con una edad media de 62,8 ± 8,3 años. Alrededor del 53,2% eran hombres y el 65,1% de los tumores estaban ubicados en el lado izquierdo del colon. El tamaño de la lesión y los valores FIT (p = 0,001) se correlacionaron positivamente. Los tumores con extensión lateral predominaron en el colon derecho (586 ng Hb/mL; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 443,4-760). Ciento treinta y cinco (26%) lesiones fueron adenomas avanzados (15 ± 6,7 mm); 694,6 ng/ml; IC 95% 632,4-756,9). El rendimiento diagnóstico más alto (0,5112) para los adenomas avanzados se obtuvo con un nivel FIT de 400 ng Hb/ml (precisión del 88,6%). Hubo diferencias significativas en los valores de FIT de CCR temprano y avanzado (927 ng/mL; [IC 95%: 637-1082] vs. 1453 [IC 95%: 1352-1594; p = 0,001]). Conclusión: Un valor FIT de 400 ng Hb/mL fue el mejor rendimiento diagnóstico para detectar adenomas avanzados y CCR. Este valor es útil durante la pandemia de COVID-19, ya que permite priorizar la colonoscopia a aquellos con mayor riesgo de padecer una enfermedad importante, reduciendo así los riesgos tanto para los pacientes como para los trabajadores de la salud.

De-implementation of Fecal Occult Blood Testing in the Emergency Department and Hospital Units: A Quality Improvement Project.

Background: Fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) are inappropriately used in patients with melena, hematochezia, coffee ground emesis, iron deficiency anemia, and diarrhea. The use of FOBT for reasons other than screening for colorectal cancer is considered low-value and unnecessary. Methods: Quality Improvement Project that utilized education, Best Practice Advisory (BPA) and modification of order sets in the electronic health record (EHR). The interventions were done in a sequential order based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) method. An annotated run chart was used to analyze the collected data. Results: Education and Best Practice Advisory within the EHR led to significant reduction in the use of FOBT in the ED. The interventions eventually led to a consensus and removal of FOBT from the order set of the EHR for patients in the ED and hospital units. Conclusions: The use of electronic BPA, education and modification of order sets in the EHR can be effective at de-implementing unnecessary tests and procedures like FOBT in the ED and hospital units.

The Framing Effect of Digital Textual Messages on Uptake Rates of Medical Checkups: Field Study.

BACKGROUND: Health care authorities often use text messages to enhance compliance with medical recommendations. The effectiveness of different message framings has been studied extensively over the past 3 decades. Recently, health care providers have begun using digital media platforms to disseminate health-related messages. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of some of the most widely used message framings on the uptake rates of medical checkups. METHODS: This study used a large-scale digital outreach campaign conducted by Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS) during 2020-2021, involving a total of 113,048 participants. MHS members aged 50-74 years were invited to take their recommended medical actions from the following list: human papillomavirus (HPV), mammography, abdominal aortic aneurysm, fecal occult blood test (FOBT), and pneumococcal vaccination. Each member was randomly assigned to receive 1 of 6 message framings: control (neutrally framed; n=20,959, 18.5%), gains (benefits of compliance; n=20,393, 18%), losses (negative consequences of noncompliance; n=15,165, 13.4%), recommendation (a recommendation by an authoritative figure, in this context by a physician; n=20,584, 18.2%), implementation intentions (linking potential outcomes to future reactions; n=20,701, 18.3%), and empowerment (emphasizing personal responsibility for maintaining good health; n=15,246, 13.5%). The time frames for measuring a successful intervention were 14 days for scheduling screenings (ie, HPV, mammography, or abdominal aortic aneurysm), 30 days for performing the FOBT, and 60 days for receiving pneumococcal vaccination. We also examined the effectiveness of media channels (text message or email) on uptake rates and whether the subject-line length is correlated with message-opening rates. RESULTS: No significant effect of message framing on uptake rates of medical checkups was observed. The rates of appointments for screening ranged from 12.9% to 14.1% across treatments. Based on a chi-square test, there was no evidence to reject the null hypothesis that these compliance rates are independent of the treatments (P=.35). The uptake rates for the FOBT and pneumococcal vaccination ranged from 23.3% to 23.8% across treatments, and we could not reject the hypothesis that they are independent of the treatments (P=.88). We also found that emails are more effective than text messages (P<.001) and that the subject-line length is negatively correlated with message-opening rates. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found for an effect of the 5 message framings on uptake rates of medical checkups. To enhance compliance rates, public health officials may consider alternative framings. Furthermore, media channels and the subject-line length should be given careful consideration in the planning stages of health care campaigns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: AEA RCT Registry AEARCTR-0006317; https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/6317/history/201365.

Realized impact of COVID-19 related disruptions on the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer mortality in Australia (1). The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) aims to reduce mortality through early detection with a biennial faecal occult blood test for Australians aged 50-74 years (2). Modelling predicted COVID-19 would reduce participation and delay colonoscopies despite the NBCSP continuing during the pandemic (3). This study analyses the realized impact of COVID-19 related disruptions on the NBCSP and the effect on mortality. METHODS: NBCSP participation, time to colonoscopy and annualized mortality were compared before and during COVID-19. The effect on mortality was determined using a validated microsimulation model (4, 5). RESULTS: From 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019, 2 497 317 people participated in the NBCSP and 168 390 received a colonoscopy, compared to 2 490 265 and 162 573 from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021. Relative participation decreased 6 % and the proportion of colonoscopies performed within the recommended 120 days increased 14.5%. A disproportionally greater impact was observed outside major cities and in lower socioeconomic areas. An estimated 98-111 additional colorectal cancer deaths resulted from 3 % fewer colonoscopies performed during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: This study presents the most comprehensive analysis of the realized impact of COVID-19 on the NBCSP. Catch-up screening would be best targeted at Australians from rural and lower socioeconomic areas where participation remains low. Streamlined referral pathways and additional colonoscopy provisioning is required as less than two thirds of screen positive patients receive a colonoscopy within the recommended 120 days.

Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: A population-based cohort study of fecal occult blood test-positive colonoscopies.

BACKGROUND: Data on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) after fecal occult blood test (FOBT)-positive colonoscopies is scarce (guaiac-based (gFOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT)). AIMS: Evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of PCCRCs in the French gFOBT CRC screening program. METHODS: Retrospective population-based cohort study of all gFOBT-positive colonoscopies performed among individuals aged 50-74 between 2003 and 2014 within the CRC screening program organized in the Haut-Rhin (Alsace, France). The main outcome was PCCRC-3y rate. Adenoma detection rates (ADRs) calculated on gFOBT-positive colonoscopies were compared to those calculated on FIT-positive colonoscopies performed by the same gastroenterologists. RESULTS: Overall, 9106 gFOBT-positive colonoscopies performed by 36 gastroenterologists were included. Sixteen PCCRC-3y and 31 PCCRC-5y were diagnosed (68.8 % and 58.1 % were true interval PCCRCs respectively). The unadjusted PCCRC-3y rate was 2.4 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.4 %-3.9 %]. The risk for PCCRC-5y was significantly higher when the gastroenterologist's ADR was <35 % compared to ≥35 % (HR 2.17 [95 %CI 1.19-3.93]). The mean absolute difference for ADR between gFOBT- and FIT-positive colonoscopies was 16.3 % in favor of FIT-positive colonoscopies. CONCLUSION: PCCRC-3y prevalence was low, estimated at 2.4 %. We suggest that the minimum standard for ADR in gFOBT- and FIT-positive colonoscopies should be set at 35 % and 50 % to 55 % respectively, in the French screening program.