Rare presentations of small bowel endometriosis.

Despite endometriosis being a relatively common chronic gynecological condition in women of childbearing age, small bowel endometriosis is rare. Presentations can vary from completely asymptomatic to reported symptoms of abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea. The following two cases depict very atypical manifestations of ileal endometriosis that presented as obscure intermittent gastrointestinal bleeding and bowel obstruction requiring surgical intervention. The first case describes a previously healthy 40-year-old woman with severe symptomatic iron deficiency anemia and intermittent melena. A small bowel enteroscopy diagnosed multiple ulcerated strictures in the distal small bowel as the likely culprit. Despite nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy being initially considered as the likely etiology, histopathological examination of the resected distal ileal segment revealed evidence of endometriosis. The second case describes a 66-year-old with a presumptive diagnosis of Crohn's disease who reported a 10-year history of intermittent perimenstrual abdominal pain, diarrhea, and nausea with vomiting. Following two subsequent episodes of acute bowel obstruction and surgical resection of the patient's stricturing terminal ileal disease, histopathological examination demonstrated active chronic inflammation with endometriosis. Small bowel endometriosis should be considered as an unusual differential diagnosis in women who may present with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding from the small bowel or recurrent bowel obstruction.

Relato de caso de lombalgia inflamatória com extenso comprometimento anatômico-funcional: a importância de uma adequada abordagem da dor lombar na Atenção Primária à Saúde / Case report of inflammatory low back pain with extensive anatomical-functional impairment: The importance of an adequate approach to low back pain in Primary Care / Presentación de un caso de lumbalgia inflamatoria con afectación anatómico-funcional extensa: La importancia de un abordaje adecuado de la lumbalgia en Atención Primaria de Salud

Introdução: A lombalgia é uma condição prevalente e que apresenta importante impacto na capacidade funcional e na qualidade de vida, sendo a sua correta abordagem na Atenção Primária à Saúde fundamental para a identificação e o estabelecimento de um diagnóstico etiológico precoce de possíveis patologias que possam estar relacionadas a desfechos mórbidos e a graves limitações funcionais. Apresentação do caso: Paciente de 56 anos, sexo masculino, hipertenso, foi encaminhado para serviço especializado de reumatologia com histórico de lombalgia havia mais de 20 anos. Ao exame físico foi constatada presença de deformidades da coluna vertebral e extensa limitação de movimentos. Exames radiográficos mostravam esclerose de articulações sacroilíacas, osteopenia difusa e coluna vertebral em aspecto de "bambu". Conclusões: Constata-se a importância de que na abordagem das lombalgias na atenção primária se busque o reconhecimento de possíveis etiologias graves e potencialmente incapacitantes que possam estar subjacentes à queixa de dor lombar. Com esse objetivo, é fundamental o reconhecimento das chamadas red flags relacionadas às lombalgias, além de sua caracterização como mecânica ou inflamatória. Perante a atuação da atenção primária no oferecimento de um cuidado pautado na integralidade e na prevenção de agravos, reafirma-se a importância de uma avaliação clínica pormenorizada das lombalgias nesse nível de atenção à saúde.

Introduction: Low back pain is a prevalent condition that has an important impact on functional capacity and quality of life, and its correct approach in Primary Care is fundamental to the identification and establishment of an early etiological diagnosis of possible pathologies that may be related to outcomes morbid conditions and serious functional limitations. Case presentation: 56-year-old male patient, hypertensive, referred to a specialized rheumatology service with a history of low back pain for over 20 years. Physical examination revealed the presence of spinal deformities and extensive movement limitations. Radiographic examinations showing sclerosis of the sacro-iliac joints, diffuse osteopenia and a "bamboo" appearance of the spine. Conclusions: It is important that in the approach of low back pain in Primary Care, we seek to recognize possible serious and potentially disabling etiologies that may underlie the complaint of low back pain. For that, it is essential to recognize the so-called "red flags" related to low back pain, in addition to its characterization as mechanical or inflammatory. Given the role of Primary Care in offering care based on integrality and in the prevention of injuries, the importance of a detailed clinical assessment of low back pain at this level of health care is reaffirmed.

Introducción: La lumbalgia es una patología prevalente que tiene un impacto importante en la capacidad funcional y la calidad de vida, y su correcto abordaje en Atención Primaria de Salud es fundamental para la identificación y establecimiento de un diagnóstico etiológico precoz de posibles patologías que puedan estar relacionadas con los resultados, condiciones morbosas y limitaciones funcionales graves. Presentación del caso: Paciente masculino de 56 años, hipertenso, remitido a servicio especializado de reumatología con antecedentes de dolor lumbar de más de 20 años. El examen físico reveló la presencia de deformidades de la columna y amplias limitaciones de movimiento. Los exámenes radiológicos muestran esclerosis de las articulaciones sacroilíacas, osteopenia difusa y una apariencia de "bambú" de la columna. Conclusiones: Es importante que al abordar la lumbalgia en Atención Primaria de Salud busquemos reconocer las posibles etiologías graves y potencialmente incapacitantes que pueden subyacer a la queja de lumbalgia. Con este objetivo, es fundamental reconocer las llamadas "banderas rojas" relacionadas con la lumbalgia, además de su caracterización como mecánica o inflamatoria. Dado el papel de Atención Primaria de Salud a la hora de ofrecer una atención basada en la integralidad y prevención de enfermedades, se reafirma la importancia de una evaluación clínica detallada de la lumbalgia en este nivel de atención sanitaria.

The Interplay Between Health Disparities and Acceptability of Virtual Reality: A Survey Study.

Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a nonpharmacological adjuvant to manage acute and chronic pain symptoms. The goal of this survey study was to determine the acceptability of VR among chronic pain participants hailing from distressed and prosperous neighborhoods in the state of Maryland. We hypothesized that pain severity and interference vary in groups experiencing health disparities, potentially influencing VR's acceptability. From March 11 to March 15, 2020, we surveyed a cohort of clinically phenotyped participants suffering from chronic orofacial pain. Participants were asked to express their willingness to participate in a longitudinal VR study and their expectation of pain relief from using VR. Seventy out of 350 participants with chronic pain completed the survey (response rate: 20%). There was no difference in the likelihood of responding to the survey based on their neighborhood distress. Among survey respondents and nonrespondents, similar proportions of participants were from distressed neighborhoods. Among the respondents, 63 (90%) and 59 (84.3%) were willing to participate and expected to experience pain relief from the VR intervention, respectively. Age, sex, race, neighborhood distress, severity of pain, and prior VR experience did not influence willingness to participate in the VR trial or the expectations of VR-induced improvement. These findings suggest that VR as an adjuvant intervention is potentially accepted by chronic pain participants, irrespective of neighborhood-level social determinants of health.

The role of a dedicated transition process from pediatric to adult interdisciplinary care for persons with spina bifida.

OBJECTIVE: Interdisciplinary care and pediatric to adult transitional programs have consistently shown medical and social value for individuals with complex medical conditions such as spina bifida (SB). Such interdisciplinary clinics are common in pediatrics but are rarely offered for adults. This survey-based study reports information related to transition, daily pain burden, and satisfaction with care delivery in an adult SB clinic. METHODS: A 23-question survey that was based on empirical observations from the adult SB clinic was formulated, IRB approved, and distributed to adult patients. Many respondents had previously received care at the institution's pediatric SB clinic and completed transition to the adult program. Responses were de-identified, categorized, stored in a secure database, and statistically analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: Of 245 patients approached, 116 (47%) surveys were completed and analyzed. Those who had a direct transition (defined as a less than 24-month gap in care) from the pediatric to the adult clinic comprised 44% (n = 51) of responders. The alternative group of 56% (n = 65) had a longer gap, disorganized or absent transition, or had pediatric care elsewhere. The study population had an average age of 36 years, had mostly received childhood care at the authors' institution, regardless of whether they made a direct transition or had a gap in care (68%), and held the diagnosis of open myelomeningocele (78%). Overall satisfaction with the clinic experience was high (mean score 9.04 on a 10-point subjective scale). Differences regarding independence in activities of daily living based on transition status were not significant, but on multivariate analysis, those who reported independence in activities of daily living had an almost 4-fold higher odds of daily pain (p = 0.024; OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.19-12.5). The most frequently identified areas for improvement included improved access to care and pain control. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric transitional processes and interdisciplinary clinics may contribute to improved patient-perceived outcomes and satisfaction with their SB care in comprehensive settings. Further elucidation of barriers to pain control is warranted, in addition to ways in which comprehensive and longitudinal care can improve them.

Associations between lifestyle-related risk factors and back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies.

BACKGROUND: Mendelian randomization (MR) studies have an advantage over conventional observational studies when studying the causal effect of lifestyle-related risk factors on back pain. However, given the heterogeneous design of existing MR studies on back pain, the reported causal estimates of these effects remain equivocal, thus obscuring the true extent of the biological effects of back pain lifestyle-risk factors. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review with multiple meta-analyses on the associations between various lifestyle factors and low back pain. METHODS: We conducted a PRISMA systematic review and specifically included MR studies to investigate the associations between lifestyle factors-specifically, BMI, insomnia, smoking, alcohol consumption, and leisure sedentary behavior-and various back pain outcomes. Each meta-analysis synthesized data from three or more studies to assess the causal impact of these exposures on distinct back pain outcomes, including chronic pain, disability, and pain severity. Quality of studies was assessed according to STROBE-MR guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 1576 studies were evaluated and 20 were included. Overall, the studies included were of high quality and had a low risk of bias. Our meta-analysis demonstrates the positive causal effect of BMI (OR IVW-random effects models: 1.18 [1.08-1.30]), insomnia(OR IVW-random effects models: 1.38 [1.10-1.74]), smoking(OR IVW-fixed effects models: 1.30 [1.23-1.36]), alcohol consumption(OR IVW-fixed effects models: 1.31 [1.21-1.42]) and leisure sedentary behaviors(OR IVW-random effects models: 1.52 [1.02-2.25]) on back pain. CONCLUSION: In light of the disparate designs and causal effect estimates presented in numerous MR studies, our meta-analysis establishes a compelling argument that lifestyle-related risk factors such as BMI, insomnia, smoking, alcohol consumption, and leisure sedentary behaviors genuinely contribute to the biological development of back pain.

Increased opioid consumption in neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter, prospective cohort study.

AIMS: PD-1 block was reported to impair opioid-induced antinociception and affect cognitive function in rodents and non-human primates. This prospective multicenter cohort study aims to investigate the possible impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with PD-1 antibody on perioperative analgesic effect of opioids and postoperative delirium (POD) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: Eighty-four NSCLC patients from three medical centers with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) or chemotherapy (nCT) were enrolled. The primary outcome is the total perioperative opioid consumption defined as the sum of intraoperative and postoperative opioid use within 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes compromise of incidence of POD, pain intensity, and number of analgesic pump press. Tumor prognostic parameters and perioperative change of inflammatory cytokines and soluble PD-L1 level were also recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included in the final analysis. The total opioid consumption (sufentanil equivalent) perioperatively in the nCIT group was significantly higher than that in the nCT group, with mean difference of 60.39 µg, 95% CI (25.58-95.19), p < 0.001. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that nCIT was correlated with increased total opioid consumption (ß = 0.305; 95% CI, 0.152-0.459; p < 0.001). The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and cumulative analgesic pump press within 72 h was significantly higher in subjects with nCIT. There is no statistical difference in incidence of POD between groups within 72 h after surgery. The pathologic complete response rate and perioperative serum IL-6 level were higher in the nCIT group than in the nCT group. CONCLUSION: Patients with NSCLC receiving nCIT warrant increased opioid consumption perioperatively and suffered from more postoperative pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05273827.

Relationships between Applied Mindfulness Practice, Chronic Pain, and Pain-Related Functioning in Veterans.

Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been shown to improve chronic pain and associated conditions like depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders. However, there is limited research on how Veterans with chronic pain apply mindfulness skills to manage pain in daily life. This cross-sectional study examined the association between applied mindfulness practice, pain, and several pain-related conditions among 1,737 Veterans with chronic pain prior to enrollment in a trial of two MBIs. Applied mindfulness practice was assessed using the Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS). Outcomes included pain interference, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, PTSD, physical function, and social participation. Higher overall AMPS scores, as well as the positive and negative emotional regulation subscales of the AMPS, were associated with less pain interference and catastrophizing, as well as better outcomes for all pain-related conditions. The positive emotional regulation subscale had the strongest associations with outcomes. There was no significant association between the AMPS and pain intensity. Results suggest applied mindfulness practice, especially positive emotional regulation, may improve pain and functioning. In addition, the AMPS shows promise as a process measure of mindfulness skills applied in daily life. Additional research is needed to examine different aspects of mindfulness in the context of MBIs. PERSPECTIVE: This article describes the relationship between applied mindfulness practice and pain-related outcomes, prior to a mindfulness-based intervention, using a novel measure of mindfulness practice. These findings underscore the importance of measuring applied mindfulness practice prior to and during clinical interventions to treat chronic pain.

[Combination of acupuncture therapy and kinesiotherapy: an example of pain rehabilitation].

The effect mechanism and the characteristics of clinical application of the combination of acupuncture therapy and kinesiotherapy are explored for pain rehabilitation. Analgesia of acupuncture therapy and kinesiotherapy is characterized by multiple targets and dimensions. The paper summarizes the effect mechanisms of these two therapies and their synergistic action and investigates the current situation and clinical characteristics of their combination in treatment of musculoskeletal pain, visceral pain and postoperative pain so that the references can be provided for the selection of pain rehabilitation programs.

Levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus dienogest effect on quality of life of women with deep endometriosis: a randomized open-label clinical trial.

Women with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) can benefit from the use of progestins. Our aim is to explore if levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) non inferior to dienogest (DNG) in improving deep endometriosis women's quality of life (QoL). This randomized open-label clinical trial included forty women with DIE assessed using clinical history and physical examination, transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance of the pelvis without any previous surgical treatment, with two treatments arms. The two groups underwent a 3-month washout of hormonal treatments, and then received either DNG or LNG-IUS for 6 months. QoL was assessed prior to and 6 months after the intervention, using the SF36 and the EHP30. DNG and LNG-IUS showed an increase on all domains of the SF36 (p < .001). There was no difference between treatments on the improvement observed (p > .05 for all domains). DNG and LNG-IUS, also, showed improvement on all domains of EHP30 (p < .001), except "relationship with children" and "feelings about pregnancy." However, there was no statistical difference between treatments for all sections scores (p > .05). The treatment of deep endometriosis symptoms using either DNG or LNG-IUS in women with no prior surgical treatment is associated with improvement in QoL.Trial Registration Number: This trial is registered on "The Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBECID: RBR-8fjx2jp)," that is part of Primary Registries in the WHO Registry Network, under the title: "Dienogest versus Levonorgestrel IUS on deep endometriosis patient´s QoL without surgery" on June 14, 2021; https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-8fjx2jp.

Bladder Endometriosis: What do we know and what is left to find out? A narrative review.

Bladder endometriosis accounts for 70-85% of urinary tract endometriosis cases. Urinary tract endometriosis occurs in approximately 1% of those living with endometriosis. Underlying aetiology and pathogenesis are not fully understood, but there are several plausible theories. As well as the typical pain symptoms, those with bladder endometriosis can experience several urinary tract symptoms. The manifestation of these symptoms can have complex pathways and processes. Imaging is accurate in the diagnosis of bladder endometriosis and clinicians should be mindful of the risk of silent kidney loss. Management should be guided by symptoms; both medical and surgical options are feasible. Surgical management offers potentially definitive treatment. Excisional surgery via bladder shave or partial cystectomy offers good improvement in symptoms with relatively low rates of serious complications and recurrence.

Suprascapular nerve blocks with 5 mL × 10 mL in the treatment of primary adhesive capsulitis: pilot study of clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To assess whether 5 mL would not be less effective than 10 mL when performing a suprascapular nerve block, regarding shoulder function and quality of life in primary adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: This is a pilot study of a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial conducted at a single center. Patients with AC characterized by constant pain and restricted movements in anterior elevation, 0°/90° external rotation, and internal rotation were selected. Two groups were randomly selected. In group I, a dose of 10 mL of bupivacaine was applied, while in group II, only 5 mL, in four weekly blocks. Sealed and sequentially numbered envelopes were used. The SF-36 and DASH questionnaires were applied in five moments. The t-Student test was used to compare the means, with a probability of rejecting null hypothesis of 5%. RESULTS: There were 17 participants with primary AC, seven in group I and 10 in group II. The average age was 54.30 and 50.43 years in the 5 mL and 10 mL groups, respectively. There were no differences when the means were compared by DASH: T0 (p = 0.074); T2 (p = 0.285); T4 (p = 0.333); T8 (p = 0.392), and T12 (p = 0.453). As for the SF-36, there were sparse differences in T2 in the domains of vitality (p = 0.006) and social aspects (p = 0.036) in favor of group I, and in the general health status domain in T8, in favor of group II (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: The volume of 5 mL is not less effective than 10 mL when performing SSNB in the treatment of primary adhesive capsulitis.

Postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a single-centre historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: Concerns around delayed emergence and opioid-induced ventilatory impairment in bariatric surgery can lead to intraoperative reliance on short-acting opioids and avoidance of long-acting analgesics with potential sedative effects. Nevertheless, an overly-conservative intraoperative analgesic strategy may result in significant pain at emergence and higher opioid requirements in later phases of care. We sought to establish the pattern of intraoperative analgesic use in bariatric surgical patients as well as their postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements. METHODS: We undertook a single-centre historical cohort study. We explored associations between intraoperative analgesic interventions and pain scores and opioid requirements in postanesthesia care units (PACUs), and associations between the quality of analgesia at emergence and subsequent pain and patient-centred recovery outcomes. RESULTS: We extracted perioperative data for 939 patients who underwent bariatric metabolic surgery between January 2018 and October 2019. Only 39% of patients received long-acting opioids intraoperatively and there was minimal use of nonopioid analgesic adjuncts. Nearly 80% of patients reported moderate-to-severe pain on PACU arrival; 97% of patients received intravenous opioids for rescue analgesia (mean dose, 31 mg oral morphine equivalents). Lower pain scores at PACU admission and discharge were associated with subsequent lower inpatient pain scores, lower opioid requirements, shorter time to ambulation, and shorter length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: In bariatric surgical patients, effective intraoperative analgesic strategies that improve early pain control may have an impact on recovery and pain experience. Judicious use of intraoperative opioids coupled with opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic techniques should be considered and balanced against concerns regarding opioid-related adverse effects in this patient population.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les préoccupations concernant l'émergence retardée et l'insuffisance ventilatoire induite par les opioïdes en chirurgie bariatrique peuvent conduire à une dépendance peropératoire aux opioïdes à courte durée d'action et à l'évitement des analgésiques à action prolongée ayant des effets sédatifs potentiels. Néanmoins, une stratégie analgésique peropératoire trop conservatrice peut entraîner une douleur importante à l'émergence et des besoins en opioïdes plus élevés dans les phases ultérieures des soins. Nous avons cherché à établir le profil d'utilisation des analgésiques peropératoires chez les patient·es en chirurgie bariatrique ainsi que leur trajectoire de douleur postopératoire et leurs besoins en opioïdes. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte historique monocentrique. Nous avons exploré les associations entre les interventions analgésiques peropératoires et les scores de douleur et les besoins en opioïdes dans les salles de réveil, ainsi que les associations entre la qualité de l'analgésie à l'émergence et la douleur ultérieure et les résultats de récupération centrés sur les patient·es. RéSULTATS: Nous avons extrait les données périopératoires de 939 patient·es ayant bénéficié d'une chirurgie métabolique bariatrique entre janvier 2018 et octobre 2019. Seulement 39 % des patient·es ont reçu des opioïdes à action prolongée en peropératoire et l'utilisation d'analgésiques auxiliaires non opioïdes a été minimale. Près de 80 % des patient·es ont signalé une douleur modérée à sévère à leur arrivée en salle de réveil; 97 % des patient·es ont reçu des opioïdes par voie intraveineuse pour une analgésie de secours (dose moyenne, équivalents de morphine orale de 31 mg). Des scores de douleur plus faibles à l'admission et à la sortie de la salle de réveil ont été associés à des scores de douleur plus faibles en milieu hospitalier, à des besoins en opioïdes plus faibles, à un délai avant l'ambulation plus court et à une durée d'hospitalisation plus courte. CONCLUSION: Chez la patientèle de chirurgie bariatrique, des stratégies analgésiques peropératoires efficaces qui améliorent le contrôle précoce de la douleur peuvent avoir un impact sur la récupération et l'expérience de la douleur. L'utilisation judicieuse d'opioïdes peropératoires associée à des techniques analgésiques multimodales d'épargne opioïde doit être envisagée et mise en balance avec les préoccupations concernant les effets indésirables liés aux opioïdes dans cette population de patient·es.

Efficacy of High-intensity laser therapy in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to assess the effects of High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) on individuals suffering from temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs). A search was conducted across six electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on HILT for TMDs: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, Cochrane Library, the PEDro database and Google Scholar (last updated on July 18, 2024). Eligible studies were chosen by independent reviewers, and their quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB). The main outcome was pain intensity (VAS), with secondary outcomes including mouth opening (mm), disability (JFLS-20), and quality of life (OHIP-14). A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the pooled effect by calculating mean differences (MD) for these variables (95% confidence level). The heterogeneity of the meta-analyses was explored using the I2 statistic. Three studies met the selection criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The main RoB was the blinding of participant and treaters. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in favor of HILT were observed for VAS and maximum mouth opening. The pooled effect showed an MD of -14.8 mm (95% CI:-27.1,-2.5) for pain intensity and 3.7 mm (95% CI:0.9,6.5) for mouth opening, changes that were assessed as clinically important. According to GRADE, the evidence was rated as important, and the certainty was moderate due to the heterogeneity between studies. A sensitivity analysis was not performed to address heterogeneity, primarily due to the limited availability of RCTs. HILT has been found effective in short-term pain relief and improvement of jaw opening in TMDs, potentially enhancing quality of life by facilitating activities such as chewing, jaw mobility, and communication. However, further research is needed to confirm its long-term effectiveness. Combining HILT with interventions such as occlusal splints or therapeutic exercises could potentially enhance its effects, leveraging the existing evidence supporting these treatments. It is important to note that the high RoB associated with the lack of blinding of participants and treaters may influence data collection, compromising the internal validity of findings in some studies.

Central sensitization symptoms in vulvodynia: exploring the role of temperament, personality traits, childhood adverse events, defense mechanisms, and mental pain on quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Vulvodynia is a chronic pain syndrome characterized by persistent vulvar pain, occurring without clinically identifiable disorders. Central sensitization (CS) is suggested to play a role in the pathophysiology of vulvodynia, as for other nociplastic pain conditions. AIM: This study delves into the complex interplay between psychosocial factors and CS burden in women with vulvodynia, aiming to identify potential predictors (temperament, personality traits, childhood adverse events, defense mechanisms, and mental pain) and understand their impact on quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A cohort-based cross-sectional web survey of 357 women with vulvodynia. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included 8 self-report measures to assess the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and psychological variables, including sensory processing sensitivity, traumatic experiences, personality traits, defense mechanisms, and mental pain. RESULTS: Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted in study 1, revealing that the following predicted higher CSI scores in women with vulvodynia: higher emotional overexcitability, decreased low sensory threshold, increased bodily threat experiences, elevated psychoticism, greater use of immature and neurotic defense mechanisms, and heightened mental pain. The final regression model identified the following as the strongest predictors of CS: low sensory threshold (ß = 0.316), bodily threat experiences (ß = 0.145), neurotic defenses (ß = 0.210), and mental pain (ß = 0.269). In study 2, the model presented interactions among these psychological factors in predicting CSI values explaining 48.9% of the variance in CS, 30.3% in psychological QoL, and 57.1% in physical QoL. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: This model opens discussion for tailored psychological interventions aimed to improve overall QoL in women with vulvodynia. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths of the study include innovative insights into the interplay between psychological variables and the construct of CS and quality of life. As a limitation, the research was conducted as a cross-sectional study with self-reported measures. CONCLUSION: The study calls for comprehensive assessments that consider physical and mental aspects, paving the way for holistic health care approaches in the management of vulvodynia.

Top Three Healthcare Trends in Orthopaedics Affecting Musculoskeletal Care in the Elderly.

Several trends toward patient-centered multi-care models employing translational research strategies are currently emerging in orthopaedics. These align seamlessly with epigenetics discussions in pain, a clinical approach to pain management that prioritizes tailoring healthcare to individual needs, preferences, and circumstances. Recognizing the unique genetic and epigenetic factors influencing pain perception, healthcare providers can integrate personalized insights into their patient-centered approach, offering more targeted and effective pain management strategies tailored to each individual's experience. Custom 3D-printing technologies may also become increasingly relevant to more effectively and reliably treat painful degenerative structural abnormalities. They are expected to go hand-in-hand with the precision medicine redefinition of musculoskeletal care. More effective analysis of surgeons' clinical decision-making and patients' perception of high-value orthopaedic care is needed. Shared Decision Making (SDM) is critical to identifying the best solution for each patient and improving stakeholders' understanding of factors influencing the diverse prioritizing values of surgical or non-surgical treatments by payers, systems, and other providers. Identifying high-value orthopaedic surgeries via effective SDM in orthopedic surgery requires more than just presenting patients with information. The Rasch analysis of patient expectations can provide this nuanced approach that involves understanding patient values, addressing misconceptions, and aligning surgical recommendations with patient-specific goals. Optimizing orthopaedic treatment within the patient-centered framework can drive innovation in reimbursement policies that support the field more broadly. Research on separating high-value from low-value orthopaedic procedures may likely impact healthcare decision- makers' resource allocation.

Outcome of intradiscal condoliase injection therapy for patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Purpose: This study aimed to compare data from patients who received intradiscal condoliase (chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase) injection for primary lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and recurrent LDH. Overview of Literature: Chemonucleolysis with condoliase for LDH is a treatment with relatively good results and a high safety profile; however, few studies have reported recurrence after LDH surgery. Methods: The study participants were 249 patients who underwent intradiscal condoliase injection for LDH at nine participating institutions, including 241 patients with initial LDH (group C) and eight with recurrent LDH (group R). Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, disease duration, intervertebral LDH level, smoking history, and diabetes history were evaluated. Low back pain/leg pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate clinical symptoms before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment. Results: Low back pain NRS scores (before treatment and at 6 months and 1 year after treatment, respectively) in group C (4.9 → 2.6 → 1.8) showed significant improvement until 1 year after treatment. Although a tendency for improvement was observed in group R (3.5 → 2.8 → 2.2), no significant difference was noted. Groups C (6.6 → 2.4 → 1.4) and R (7.0 → 3.1 → 3.2) showed significant improvement in the leg pain NRS scores after treatment. Group C (41.4 → 19.5 → 13.7) demonstrated significant improvement in the ODI up to 1 year after treatment; however, no significant difference was found in group R (35.7 → 31.7 → 26.4). Conclusions: Although intradiscal condoliase injection is less effective for LDH recurrence than for initial cases, it is useful for improving leg pain and can be considered a minimally invasive and safe treatment method.

Single simple question in axonal polyneuropathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The single simple question (SSQ), "What percentage of normal (0%-100%) do you feel regarding your disease?" has proven feasible and valid in assessing myasthenia gravis and a heterogeneous spectrum of neuropathies. This study explores the utility of the SSQ in axonal polyneuropathies (PNPs), encompassing diabetic neuropathy, and evaluates its responsiveness to scale changes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 150 patients with axonal PNP responding to the SSQ was performed. Patients underwent clinical and electrophysiological evaluations, and were evaluated by clinical and disability scales, including the Medical Research Council sum score, modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy score (mTCNS), Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale, and Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (RODS). RESULTS: The SSQ total scores correlated moderately with both the RODS score (r = .59, p < .001) and the mTCNS symptom score (r = -.43, p < .001), maintaining significance after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Longitudinally, after adjusting for multiple comparisons, the change in mTCNS symptom score retained statistical significance (adjusted p = .048). The SSQ did not show any association with electrophysiological parameters or sensory symptoms, other than a lower score in those with pain (100% with SSQ <40%, 85% with SSQ 40%-70%, and 34% with SSQ >70%). DISCUSSION: The SSQ is a feasible, valid scale that may be utilized to assess and follow patients with length-dependent axonal PNPs. Given that the SSQ is not strongly associated with clinical and disability scales or electrophysiological findings, additional investigations are required for a comprehensive assessment of PNP.

Jaw-neck motor function 2 years after whiplash trauma.

BACKGROUND: There is limited knowledge about the possible long-term effects on jaw motor function after whiplash trauma. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to evaluate integrated jaw and head-neck movement amplitudes during jaw function in individuals 2 years after whiplash trauma, compared to controls. The secondary aim was to evaluate changes between the acute stage and a 2-year follow-up in terms of jaw and head-neck movement amplitudes during jaw function. METHODS: This study included 28 cases exposed to a whiplash trauma 2 years earlier (13 women) and 28 controls (13 women) without previous neck trauma. Head and jaw movement amplitudes were recorded during maximal jaw opening-closing movements using an optoelectronic 3D recording system. For a subpopulation of 12 cases and 15 controls, recordings had also been performed in the acute stage after the whiplash trauma. Jaw and head movement amplitudes were analysed using linear regression with group and sex as independent variables. The subpopulation longitudinal analysis was adjusted for movement amplitudes at baseline. RESULTS: Jaw movement amplitudes were significantly associated with group (coefficient: -0.359: 95% CI: -10.70 to -1.93, p = .006) with smaller amplitudes of jaw movements for whiplash cases. Head movement amplitudes were not associated with group (coefficient: -0.051, 95% CI: -4.81 to 3.20, p = .687). In the longitudinal analysis, both jaw and head movement amplitudes showed significant associations between baseline and the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that the effects on jaw function in terms of jaw opening capacity in the acute stage after whiplash trauma do not spontaneously recover.