Risk factor analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy with a focus on the peritoneum to portal vein distance on computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major complication of distal pancreatectomy (DP). Although the visceral fat area (VFA) is a risk factor for POPF in DP, its measurement is complicated. This study aimed to identify a simple marker as a predictive indicator of POPF. METHODS: We included 210 patients who underwent resection at our institution between 2020 and 2023. The patients' characteristics, preoperative laboratory data, and radiographic findings (e.g., portal vein distance and VFA) and their association with pancreatic fistula after DP were analyzed. POPF was defined as Grade B or C pancreatic fistula on the basis of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery 2016 consensus. RESULTS: POPF developed in 82 (39.0%) patients. Univariate analysis showed that female sex, pancreatic thickness of the cutting line, operative time, blood loss, C-reactive protein (CRP) level on postoperative day (POD) 3, drain amylase level on POD 3, VFA, and the peritoneum to portal vein distance (PPD) were associated with POPF. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of PPD showed a higher area under the curve than VFA (cutoff for PPD: 68 mm). Multivariate analysis showed that CRP (odds ratio [OR]: 2.214), drain amylase (OR: 2.875), and PPD (OR: 15.538) were independent risk factors. When we compared the DP fistula risk score and PPD, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed areas under the curve of 0.650 and 0.803, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A PPD of ≥68 mm is a useful risk predictor of POPF. Determining this distance is simple and easily applicable in the clinical setting.

Low incidence of pancreatic fistula and well-preserved endocrine function with non-reconstructed small remnant pancreas after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Aim: Pancreatic reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) that leaves a small remnant pancreas is often difficult. Pancreatic fistula is a major complication after PD, and fistulas are rare in patients with hard pancreas. However, the clinical impact of non-reconstructed small remnant after PD with hard pancreas is unknown. Methods: We included all patients who underwent PD for pancreatic tumor without pancreatic reconstruction in two institutions supervised by one surgeon between January 2004 and March 2021. Their short- or long-term outcome after surgery was retrospectively analyzed. Results: PD was performed in 774 patients, of whom 16 patients were without reconstruction (2.1%) with negative margins at the pancreatic stump. Pancreatic transection was performed above or to the left of the superior mesenteric artery, with a median remnant pancreas length of 3.7 cm (range, 1.3-10.0). A major complication (≥ Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIa) occurred in one patient (6%). Fistula of grade B occurred in one patient (6%). After a median follow-up of 44 months (95%CI, 10.6-77.3), insulin administration was unnecessary in 11 patients. Conclusion: The preservation of a small pancreatic remnant without reconstruction after PD can be performed safely and may enable the keeping of pancreatic endocrine function for some selected patients with hard pancreas.

Significance of blood culture testing after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Aim: The aim of this study was to clarify the significance of blood culture testing in the postoperative period of pancreatoduodectomy (PD), a highly invasive surgery. Methods: Rates of blood culture sampling and positivity were investigated for febrile episodes (FEs) in patients who underwent PD (2016-2021). FEs were defined as body temperature of 38.0°C or higher occurring on or after the 4th postoperative day. Fever origin was diagnosed retrospectively, and FEs were classified as pancreatic fistula (PF)-related or PF-unrelated FEs. Factors correlated with blood culture positivity were explored. Results: Among 339 patients who underwent PD, 99 experienced 202 FEs. Blood culture testing was performed on 160 FEs occurring in 89 patients. The sampling and positivity rates were 79.2% and 17.5%, respectively, per episode and 89.9% and 28.1%, respectively, per patient. Thirty-six FEs were classified as PF-related and 124 were classified as PF-unrelated FEs. The blood culture positivity rate was significantly lower in PF-related vs. PF-unrelated FEs (1/36 vs. 27/124, respectively, p = 0.006). The blood culture positivity rate was significantly higher in patients with cholangitis, catheter-related blood stream infection, and urinary tract infection than PF-related FEs. Multivariate analysis showed that blood culture positivity was negatively associated with PF-related FEs and positively associated with accompanying symptoms of shivering, Pitt Bacteremia Score, and preoperative biliary drainage. Conclusions: Patients who underwent PD showed relatively high blood culture positivity rates. Based on these results, it may be possible to distinguish PF-related and -unrelated FEs.

Management of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistulas After Pancreaticoduodenectomy Using Open Drainage and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and Dwell Times.

Introduction Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common complication of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) that may cause lethal complications. Therefore, it is important to properly treat POPF and prevent its aggravation during the postoperative management of PD. We have used a combination of open drainage, in which the wound above the fluid collection is opened, and negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) to manage POPF after PD. To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of this combination treatment, we analyzed the outcomes of patients with POPF after PD. Methods Patients who underwent PD were reviewed and those who developed POPF were extracted and divided into three groups according to the management of POPF: N group (patients treated with open drainage and NPWTi-d), O group (patients treated with open drainage without NPWTi-d), and C group (patients treated with catheter drainage). The perioperative outcomes were compared among the three groups. Results During the study period, 133 patients underwent PD, out of which 39 (29%) developed POPF (≥grade B). Among the 39 patients with POPF, eight, four, and 27 were classified into the N, O, and C group, respectively. No mortality was observed in the patients with POPF. No severe complications were observed in the patients who underwent open drainage (N and O groups), while two patients in the C group developed severe complications. Among the patients who underwent open drainage, the N group tended to have a shorter postoperative hospital stay than the O group. Conclusions The current study suggests that open drainage safely and effectively healed POPF and NPWTi-d promoted wound closure. The combination of open drainage and NPWTi-d may prevent the aggravation of POPF, reduce failure to rescue, and shorten hospital stay after PD.

Laparoscopic enucleation of tumors embedded in the pancreatic head: Safety and feasibility.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment for a benign or low-grade malignant tumor in the pancreatic head remains a challenge at present. As an organ-sparing procedure, enucleation is ideal. However, it is still controversial whether laparoscopic enucleation (LapEN) can be safely performed for a pancreatic head tumor, especially a deeply embedded one. METHODS: The cases who underwent LapEN of a pancreatic tumor from January 2014 to September 2022 in our hospital were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 151 cases were collected. The incidence of pancreatic fistula (PF, grade B) was 21.9 %. No patient developed PF (grade C) or died. Compared with enucleating a tumor in the distal pancreas (N = 98), enucleating a tumor in the pancreatic head (N = 53) showed a longer operation time and a higher incidence of conversion. The cases with a tumor in the pancreatic head were then divided into the group with a deeply embedded tumor (N = 32) and the group with a superficial tumor (N = 21). The embedded group had a smaller tumor size and a higher proportion of insulinoma. There were no statistical differences in the parameters of operation time, blood loss and incidence of complications between the two groups. The outcomes of enucleating a tumor deeply embedded in the proximal and distal pancreas were further analyzed, which indicated no statistical differences in clinical parameters between the two groups. CONCLUSION: LapEN of a tumor in the pancreatic head is feasible and safe, even for a deeply embedded tumor.

Abdominal drainage after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: out of sight, out of mind?

BACKGROUNDS: The use of drains in pancreatic surgery remains controversial. The present study investigated postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) without intraperitoneal drain placement. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients undergoing MIDP between 2013 and 2023 were prospectively collected. Patients were divided in drain group (DG), including patients with prophylactic abdominal drain placed, and no-drain group (NDG) including those without drain. The groups were compared in terms of postoperative outcomes, using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: 116 patients were selected. After matching, DG and NDG consisted of 29 patients each. The rates of POPF and abdominal collection were lower in NDG in comparison to DG (3.4% vs. 27.6%, p 0.025 and 3.4% vs. 31.0%, p 0.011, respectively). The length of stay was significantly shorter in the NDG (5 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001). No difference between the groups was found for other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Drain omission was associated with lower rates of POPF and abdominal collections, as well as shorter hospital stays, not affecting the rate of severe complication, reoperation and readmission.

Persisting Cutaneous Pancreatic Fistula in a Patient With Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Novel Approach of Transfistulous Histoacryl Occlusion.

Necrotizing pancreatitis with superinfection of necrotic tissue is associated with a high rate of complications and mortality. The step-up approach is a well-established treatment strategy for necrotizing pancreatitis, emphasizing minimally invasive and endoscopic interventions before considering surgical options. Minimally invasive strategies often involve percutaneous drainage of collections, which carries the risk of persisting cutaneous pancreatic fistulas. Since there is currently no guidance for managing this scenario, we present a novel treatment approach that utilized tissue glue to occlude a persisting and clinically compromising percutaneous fistula. In addition, we summarize the current knowledge in the treatment of percutaneous pancreatic fistulas and provide a potential therapeutic algorithm for further evaluation.

Comparisons of laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using barbed and conventional sutures for pancreaticojejunostomy: a propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the effect of different sutures and surgical approaches on the quality of pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD). This study compares the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) between the use of barbed sutures (BSs) and conventional sutures (CSs). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 253 consecutive patients who had undergone MIPD from July 2016 to April 2023. Patients were excluded if conversion to open surgery or open anastomosis was necessary. 220 patients were enrolled and divided into BS (n = 148) and CS (n = 72) groups. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 67 cases remained in each group. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified factors associated with CR-POPF. Comparisons were also made between laparoscopic (LPD) and robotic (RPD) pancreaticoduodenectomy. RESULTS: After PSM, BSs were associated with significantly lower rates of CR-POPF (7.5 vs. 22.4%, P = 0.015) and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) (7.5vs. 19.4%, P = 0.043). No significant differences were found in operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, or other major morbidities. Multivariate analyses revealed BMI ≥ 22 kg/m2 (OR = 5.048, 95% CI: 1.256-20.287, P = 0.023) and the use of BSs (OR = 0.196, 95% CI: 0.059-0.653, P = 0.008) as the independent predictors of CR-POPF. There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes between the LPD and RPD groups, but RPD was associated with significantly shorter operative time (402.8 min vs. 429.4 min, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, using BSs for PJ during MIPD is feasible and has the potential to reduce CR-POPF and severe complications.

Artificial intelligence for surgical safety during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Indication of anatomical landmarks related to postoperative pancreatic fistula using deep learning.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a critical complication of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). However, there are no widely recognized anatomical landmarks to prevent POPF during LG. This study aimed to identify anatomical landmarks related to POPF occurrence during LG for gastric cancer and to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) navigation system for indicating these landmarks. METHODS: Dimpling lines (DLs)-depressions formed between the pancreas and surrounding organs-were defined as anatomical landmarks related to POPF. The DLs for the mesogastrium, intestine, and transverse mesocolon were named DMP, DIP, and DTP, respectively. We included 50 LG cases to develop the AI system (45/50 were used for training and 5/50 for adjusting the hyperparameters of the employed system). Regarding the validation of the AI system, DLs were assessed by an external evaluation committee using a Likert scale, and the pancreas was assessed using the Dice coefficient, with 10 prospectively registered cases. RESULTS: Six expert surgeons confirmed the efficacy of DLs as anatomical landmarks related to POPF in LG. An AI system was developed using a semantic segmentation model that indicated DLs in real-time when this system was synchronized during surgery. Additionally, the distribution of scores for DMP was significantly higher than that of the other DLs (p < 0.001), indicating the relatively high accuracy of this landmark. In addition, the Dice coefficient of the pancreas was 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: The DLs may be used as anatomical landmarks related to POPF occurrence. The developed AI navigation system can help visualize the DLs in real-time during LG.

WONDER-02: plastic stent vs. lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts-study protocol for a multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage has become a first-line treatment modality for symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. Despite the increasing popularity of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs), plastic stents may resolve non-necrotic fluid collections effectively with lower costs and no LAMS-specific adverse events. To date, there has been a paucity of data on the appropriate stent type in this setting. This trial aims to assess the non-inferiority of plastic stents to a LAMS for the initial EUS-guided drainage of pseudocysts. METHODS: The WONDER-02 trial is a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial, which will enrol pancreatic pseudocyst patients requiring EUS-guided treatment in 26 centres in Japan. This trial plans to enrol 80 patients who will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either plastic stents or a LAMS (40 patients per arm). In the plastic stent group, EUS-guided drainage will be performed using two 7-Fr double pigtail stents. In the LAMS group, the treatment will be performed in the same way except for LAMS use. The step-up treatment will be performed via endoscopic and/or percutaneous procedures at the trial investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint is clinical success, which is defined as a decrease in a pseudocyst size to ≤ 2 cm and an improvement in inflammatory indicators (i.e. body temperature, white blood cell count, and serum C-reactive protein). Secondary endpoints include technical success, adverse events including mortality, pseudocyst recurrence, and medical costs. DISCUSSION: The WONDER-02 trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of plastic stents compared to a LAMS in EUS-guided treatment of symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts with a particular focus on the non-inferior efficacy of plastic stents. The findings will help establish a new treatment algorithm for this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06133023 registered on 9 November 2023. UMIN000052647 registered on 30 October 2023. jRCT1032230444 registered on 7 November 2023.

Celiac Axis Stenosis as an Independent Risk Factor for Bile Leakage in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Celiac axis stenosis can potentially lead to insufficient blood supply to vital organs, such as the liver, spleen, pancreas, and stomach. This condition result in the development of collateral circulation between the superior mesenteric artery and the hepatic artery. However, these collateral circulations are often disrupted during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), which may increase the risk of postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) from April 2015 to April 2023. Celiac trunk stenosis is classified according to the degree of stenosis: no stenosis (<30%), grade A (30%-<50%), grade B (50%-≤80%), and grade C (>80%). The incidence of postoperative complications was evaluated, and both univariate and multivariate risk analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 997 patients were included in the study, with mild celiac axis stenosis present in 23 (2.3%) patients, moderate stenosis in 18 (1.8%) patients, and severe stenosis in 10 (1.0%) patients. Independent risk factors for the development of bile leakage, as identified by both univariate and multivariate analyses, included body mass index (BMI) (HR = 1.108, 95% CI = 1.008-1.218, P = .033), intra-abdominal infection (HR = 2.607, 95% CI = 1.308-5.196, P = .006), postoperative hemorrhage (HR = 4.510, 95% CI = 2.048-9.930, P = <0.001), and celiac axis stenosis (50%-≤80%, HR = 4.235, 95% CI = 1.153-15.558, P = .030), and (>80%, HR = 4.728, 95% CI = .882-25.341, P = .047). Celiac axis stenosis, however, was not determined to be an independent risk factor for pancreatic fistula (P > 0.05). Additionally, the presence of an aberrant hepatic artery did not significantly increase the risk of postoperative complications when compared with celiac axis stenosis alone. Conclusion: Severe celiac axis stenosis is an independent risk factor for postoperative bile leakage following LPD.

Initial Experience of Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a Newly Developed Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit Serving in a Lower-Middle-Income Country.

Introduction: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to determine the short-term outcomes of PD performed over 1 year at a newly established hepato-pancreatico-biliary unit in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained hospital information system (HIS) was undertaken of all patients referred to the unit between May 2021 and August 2022. Data were collected from the medical records of patients in the HIS. Data were analyzed for primary location, age, complications, and operative parameters. Results: The primary sites of disease were ampulla (n = 18, 52.9%), pancreas (n = 11, 32.4%), and duodenum (n = 5, 14.7%). The median duration of surgery was 7 h. 16 (47.1%) patients required blood transfusion either intraoperatively or in the perioperative period. Patients with pre-operative biliary drainage (PBD) were more likely to have multidrug-resistant positive bile cultures with a P-value of 0.2 (n = 12 [35.3%] vs. n = 5 [14.7%]). Overall morbidity was 38.2%. The most common complications were wound infection (n = 12, 35.3%), delayed gastric emptying (n = 6, 17.6%), and type B pancreatic fistula (n = 3, 8.8%). The complication rate was higher in patients with biliary stenting (n = 11 [32.4%] vs. n = 2 [5.9%]; P = 0.06). The median length of hospital stay for patients without complications was less (6 vs. 12 days; P < 0.001). The complication rate was lower in total laparoscopic PD (TLPD) with P = 0.4 (TLPD: 2.9%, open: 23.5%, laparoscopic assisted: 11.8%). 90-day mortality was zero. Conclusion: Short-term outcomes for PD in our facility are comparable to high-volume centers. PBD can significantly increase operative time, hospital stay, and morbidity.

Reduction of Postoperative Complications in Pancreatic Surgery by Standardizing Perioperative Management: An Observational Cohort Study.

Introduction: Resection for pancreatic malignancy remains the gold standard for cure. Postoperative morbidity continues to be high even after technical innovations. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a standard perioperative pancreatic oncological surgery step-by-step protocol in reducing organ-specific complications. Methods: In this observational cohort study, we analyzed the outcomes of oncologic pancreatic head resections from 2015 to 2022 after the implementation of a standard perioperative fail-safe protocol and compared these data with a historical cohort (2013-2014). In the study group, all patients were treated with preoperative limited mechanical bowel preparation, administration of a somatostatin analog, and a "pancreatic duct tube" in pancreatoduodenectomy. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of postoperative organ-specific complications. Results: A total of 151 patients were included in this study. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B and C) in the fail-safe group was 4.2%. Other organ-specific complications as postoperative hemorrhage (2.5%) and delayed gastric emptying (9.2%) also occurred less frequent than before implementation of the fail-safe protocol. Conclusion: The use of this standardized fail-safe protocol for oncologic pancreatoduodenectomy can lead to a low postoperative morbidity with improved surgical outcomes.

Early postoperative fever as a predictor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The connection between early postoperative fever and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate this association and assess the predictive value of early postoperative fever for CR-POPF. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adult patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at a tertiary teaching hospital between 2007 and 2019. Patients were categorized into those with early postoperative fever (≥ 38 °C in the first 48 h after surgery) and those without early postoperative fever groups. Weighted logistic regression analysis using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and multivariable logistic analysis were performed. The c-statistics of the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to evaluate the impact on the predictive power of adding early postoperative fever to previously identified predictors of CR-POPF. RESULTS: Of the 1997 patients analyzed, 909 (45.1%) developed early postoperative fever. The overall incidence of CR-POPF among all the patients was 14.3%, with an incidence of 19.5% in the early postoperative fever group and 9.9% in the group without early postoperative fever. Early postoperative fever was significantly associated with a higher risk of CR-POPF after sIPTW (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-2.22; P < 0.001) and multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.42-2.49; P < 0.001). The c-statistics for the models with and without early postoperative fever were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73-0.79) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72-0.78), respectively, showing a significant difference between the two (difference, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00-0.03; DeLong's test, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative fever is a significant but not highly discriminative predictor of CR-POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, its widespread occurrence limits its applicability as a predictive marker.

Clinicopathological Evaluation of Postpancreaticoduonenectomy Hemorrhage with Endovascular Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Postpancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a serious complication. Fatty or nonfibrous pancreas, or both, is a risk factor for pancreatic fistula. This study assessed various prognostic factors for interventional procedures for PPH, also focusing on the degree of pancreatic fatty infiltration/fibrosis evaluated histopathologically. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The participants were 29 patients with PPH who underwent endovascular treatment from September 2001 to March 2020. Univariate analysis was performed to determine whether the histopathological degree of pancreatic fatty infiltration/fibrosis and other factors were associated with complications and mortality after endovascular treatment for PPH. RESULTS: Of 39 treatment sessions overall, 38 (97%) achieved technical success and 34 (87%) had clinical success. In-hospital mortality occurred in five patients (17%). No association was found between the pancreatic fistula and the histopathological degree of pancreatic fatty infiltration/fibrosis. Fourteen patients with hemorrhagic shock before endovascular treatment included all five patients with in-hospital mortality, while the 15 patients without hemorrhagic shock survived (P = 0.017). A bleeding tendency was associated with complications after endovascular treatment for PPH (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Although our results revealed no significant relation between the histopathological degree of pancreatic fatty infiltration/fibrosis and clinical success, including prognosis, endovascular treatment may be effective for PPH.

Anastomotic bleeding from invaginated pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, treatment and prevention.

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis of 10 randomized prospective trials demonstrated a higher risk of postoperative bleeding from pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) compared with pancreatojejunostomy following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). This study evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and treatment of anastomotic bleeding from invaginated PG. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive PDs performed between April 1, 2011 and December 31, 2022 using invaginated PG by the double purse-string technique. Multivariate analysis identified risk factors for anastomotic PG bleeding. RESULTS: During the study, 695 consecutive patients with a median age of 66 years underwent PD; the majority was performed for ductal pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Simultaneous vascular resections were performed in 328 patients. Postoperative mortality was 4.1%. Bleeding from PG occurred in 33(4.6%) patients at a median interval of 5 days (range, 1-14) from surgery, leading to reoperation in 21(63%). PG bleeding-related mortality was 9.0%. Multivariate analyses identified a soft pancreatic texture and Wirsung duct > 3 or ≤ 3 mm (Class C and D, respectively, of the ISGPS) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.38-3.44; P = 0.0009) and wrapping of the invaginated pancreas (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17-0.84; P = 0.01) as independent risk factors for PG bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: In a large volume setting, anastomotic bleeding from invaginated PG occurred in ~ 5% of patients and was associated with soft pancreatic parenchyma and small wirsung duct. The reduced rate of PG bleeding observed with wrapping of the invaginated pancreatic stump warrants further evaluation in a prospective randomized study.

Efficacy of Reinforced Stapler for Preventing Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has become a treatment option for benign and malignant pancreatic tumors, the safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers in MIDP remain controversial. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety of reinforced staplers in MIDP and identify the risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after MIDP with reinforced staplers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 92 consecutive patients who underwent MIDP at NHO Kyushu Medical Center from July 2016 to August 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. In all patients, a reinforced black cartridge triple-row stapler (Covidien Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was used during MIDP. The primary endpoint was the incidence of clinically relevant POPF. The risk factors for POPF were evaluated using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among the 92 patients, 74 underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and 18 underwent robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy. Clinically relevant POPF occurred in seven (7.6%) of 92 patients. The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) was 10.8%, and the mortality rate was 0%. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent risk factor for clinically relevant POPF after MIDP with a reinforced stapler was a body mass index of ≥22.6 kg/m2 (p=0.050, odds ratio=7.60). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the safety and efficacy of reinforced staplers for preventing POPF after MIDP. A high body mass index was the only risk factor for clinically relevant POPF after MIDP with a reinforced stapler.

Identifying the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a surgical procedure for treating pancreatic cancer; however, the risk of complications remains high owing to the wide range of organs involved during the surgery and the difficulty of anastomosis. Pancreatic fistula (PF) is a major complication that not only increases the risk of postoperative infection and abdominal hemorrhage but may also cause multi-organ failure, which is a serious threat to the patient's life. This study hypothesized the risk factors for PF after LPD. AIM: To identify the risk factors for PF after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 201 patients admitted to the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between August 2022 and August 2023 who underwent LPD for pancreatic cancer. On the basis of the PF's incidence (grades B and C), patients were categorized into the PF (n = 15) and non-PF groups (n = 186). Differences in general data, preoperative laboratory indicators, and surgery-related factors between the two groups were compared and analyzed using multifactorial logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: The proportions of males, combined hypertension, soft pancreatic texture, and pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 3 mm; surgery time; body mass index (BMI); and amylase (Am) level in the drainage fluid on the first postoperative day (Am > 1069 U/L) were greater in the PF group than in the non-PF group (P < 0.05), whereas the preoperative monocyte count in the PF group was lower than that in the non-PF group (all P < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis revealed that BMI > 24.91 kg/m² [odds ratio (OR) =13.978, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.886-103.581], hypertension (OR = 8.484, 95%CI: 1.22-58.994), soft pancreatic texture (OR = 42.015, 95%CI: 5.698-309.782), and operation time > 414 min (OR = 15.41, 95%CI: 1.63-145.674) were risk factors for the development of PF after LPD for pancreatic cancer (all P < 0.05). The areas under the ROC curve for BMI, hypertension, soft pancreatic texture, and time prediction of PF surgery were 0.655, 0.661, 0.873, and 0.758, respectively. CONCLUSION: BMI (> 24.91 kg/m²), hypertension, soft pancreatic texture, and operation time (> 414 min) are considered to be the risk factors for postoperative PF.

The ingenious drainage system controls persistent duodenal stump fistula due to pancreatic fistula after subtotal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Duodenal stump fistula (DSF) is a dangerous complication after gastrectomy. There is no consensus on the management of DSF. Sometimes, emergency surgery may be necessary. We present the case who underwent subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for advanced gastric cancer. After that surgery, we diagnosed DSF due to pancreatic fistula, and performed reoperation because of hemodynamic instability due to diffuse peritonitis and sepsis. We resected the stump and closed with handsewn suturing and inserted three intra-abdominal drainage tubes, including a dual drainage tube around the duodenal stump. Although there was a recurrence of DSF, because of the continuous and absolute drainage, the patient improved and discharged on postoperative Day 59. From this experience, diligent debridement and a continuous suction dual drainage system, intraluminal drain of the duodenum, and biliary diversion may be an effective surgical management for DFS.