Radiological diagnosis of severe appendicitis in 4 months infant with possible microperforation: A rare case report.

Appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring surgical intervention; however, it is extremely rare in infants. Its diagnosis and treatment are challenging due to nonspecific clinical signs and symptoms. As a result, delayed or missed diagnosis is common in young children and is associated with an increased risk of perforation and peritonitis. We reported a case of a 4-month-old healthy male child. The patient presented with abdominal distention and fever. After ruling out other possible causes, he was diagnosed with acute appendicitis, which was confirmed by a CT scan. A gangrenous appendix, dilated bowel loops, and free fluid in the abdomen were discovered during surgery. An appendectomy was performed. The appendix in infants has an average length of 4.5 cm compared with 9.5 cm in adults. Infantile appendicitis is considered rare but cases have been documented also in neonates, misdiagnosis rates are high due to rarity in this age group in addition to nonspecific signs and symptoms, which led to a high perforation rate. Ultrasonography can diagnose appendicitis in children with a sensitivity and specificity of 90%-95% without subjecting the child to radiation. A physician should always keep the diagnosis of appendicitis in mind in the infant age group, even though it is rare, as a delay in diagnosis and treatment has been associated with an increased risk of complications including appendicular perforation and peritonitis.

Identification of children with a nondiagnostic ultrasound at a low appendicitis risk using a pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator.

OBJECTIVES: Up to 50% of ultrasounds (USs) for suspected pediatric appendicitis are nondiagnostic. While the validated low-risk clinical pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) score < 15% and the low-risk US with nonvisualized appendix and no periappendiceal inflammation carry relatively low appendicitis risks, the contribution of the combination of both characteristics to this risk has never been assessed. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of children with the low-risk US-low-risk pARC combination with appendicitis. We hypothesized that this proportion would be 2.5% (upper 95% CI ≤ 5%). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 448 previously healthy children 4-17 years old at a pediatric ED with suspected appendicitis, nondiagnostic US, and persistent clinical concern about appendicitis. Two investigators abstracted demographic, clinical, and imaging data. Based on published criteria, USs were classified as low-risk or high-risk. The pARC includes seven demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables and is quantified according to the published formula. The primary outcome was appendicitis, based on the histological evidence. All nonoperated patients underwent a 1-month-follow-up to exclude delayed appendicitis diagnoses. RESULTS: Sixty of the 448 (13.4%) patients had appendicitis; 269 (60%) had low-risk US, 262 (58.4%) had low-risk pARC, and 163 (36.4%) had both characteristics. The appendicitis rates with low-risk pARC alone and low-risk US alone were 14/262 (5.4%) and 21/269 (7.8%), respectively. A total of 2/163 children (1.2%) with low-risk pARC and low-risk US had appendicitis (95% CI 0%-4.4%). Higher-risk US increased the appendicitis odds 5 (95% CI 1.54-20.55) to 11 times (95% CI 2.41-51.10) across pARC levels. The low-risk combination had sensitivity of 96.7% (95% CI 88.5%-99.6%), specificity of 41.5%, positive predictive value of 20.4%, and negative predictive value of 98.8% (95% CI 95.6%-99.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The children with low-risk pARC and low-risk US combination are unlikely to have appendicitis and can be discharged home. The presence of higher-risk US-pARC score combinations substantially increases the appendicitis risk and warrants reassessment or interval imaging.

The Association Between C-Reactive Protein Levels and Pediatric Appendicitis Score and the Severity of Appendicitis in Children.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is a common cause of abdominal pain leading to emergent abdominal surgery in children. C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammatory marker typically elevated in acute appendicitis, and Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS), a clinical scoring system used for the diagnosis of appendicitis, have the potential to predict the severity of inflammation of the appendix. This may be useful in helping the physician make a treatment plan prior to surgery. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether CRP value and PAS differ with the extent of inflammation of the appendix seen on histologic examination. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis via computed tomography or ultrasound. Enrolled patients had CRP levels drawn, PAS calculated, and appendix pathology reviewed. Appendix pathology was categorized by the pathologist on the basis of the level of inflammation: simple, suppurative, gangrenous, and perforated. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-three patients were enrolled. CRP levels and PAS were statistically different (p < 0.002) among the four pathology classifications. Patients with simple appendicitis (n = 3) had a mean CRP of 2.95 mg/L and PAS of 3.9, patients with suppurative appendicitis (n = 99) had a mean CRP of 26.89 mg/L and PAS of 6.5, patients with gangrenous appendicitis (n = 56) had a mean CRP of 91.11 mg/L and PAS of 7.5, and patients with perforated appendicitis (n = 6) had a mean CRP of 154.17 mg/L and PAS of 7. The results remained statistically significant (p < 0.002) after adjusting for age, race, and sex. When combined-PAS ≥ 8 and CRP level > 40 mg/L-the specificity of complicated appendicitis was 91.2% and positive predictive value was 72.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Higher CRP levels and PAS were associated with increased histologic inflammation of the appendix. This study provides preliminary evidence that CRP and PAS could potentially assist in treatment decisions for appendicitis.

Using Artificial Intelligence to Label Free-Text Operative and Ultrasound Reports for Grading Pediatric Appendicitis.

PURPOSE: Data science approaches personalizing pediatric appendicitis management are hampered by small datasets and unstructured electronic medical records (EMR). Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots based on large language models can structure free-text EMR data. We compare data extraction quality between ChatGPT-4 and human data collectors. METHODS: To train AI models to grade pediatric appendicitis preoperatively, several data collectors extracted detailed preoperative and operative data from 2100 children operated for acute appendicitis. Collectors were trained for the task based on satisfactory Kappa scores. ChatGPT-4 was prompted to structure free text from 103 random anonymized ultrasound and operative records in the dataset using the set variables and coding options, and to estimate appendicitis severity grade from the operative report. A pediatric surgeon then adjudicated all data, identifying errors in each method. RESULTS: Within the 44 ultrasound (42.7%) and 32 operative reports (31.1%) discordant in at least one field, 98% of the errors were found in the manual data extraction. The appendicitis grade was erroneously assigned manually in 29 patients (28.2%), and by ChatGPT-4 in 3 (2.9%). Across datasets, the use of the AI chatbot was able to avoid misclassification in 59.2% of the records including both reports and extracted data approximately 40 times faster. CONCLUSION: AI chatbot significantly outperformed manual data extraction in accuracy for ultrasound and operative reports, and correctly assigned the appendicitis grade. While wider validation is required and data safety concerns must be addressed, these AI tools show significant promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of research data collection. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Left-sided appendicitis managed laparoscopically: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain and remains the most common abdominal-related emergency seen in emergency room that needs urgent surgery (Yang et al. in J Emerg Med 43:980-2, 2012. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.11.056, Wickramasinghe et al. in World J Surg 45:1999-2008, 2021. 10.1007/s00268-021-06077-5). The characteristic presentation is a vague epigastric or periumbilical discomfort or pain that migrates to the lower right quadrant in 50% of cases. Other related symptoms, such as nausea, anorexia, vomiting, and change in bowel habits, occur in varying percentages. The diagnosis is usually reached through comprehensive history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and radiological investigations as needed. Nowadays, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis is considered the modality of choice for definitive assessment of patients being evaluated for possible appendicitis. Anatomical variations or an ectopic appendix are rarely reported or highlighted in literature. CASE PRESENTATION: Left-sided appendicitis is a rare (Hu et al. in Front Surg 2022. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.896116) and atypical presentation and has rarely been reported. The majority of these cases are associated with congenital midgut malrotation, situs inversus, or an extremely long appendix (Akbulut et al. in World J Gastroenterol 16:5598-5602, 2010. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5598). This case is of significance to raise awareness regarding an anatomical variation of the appendix that might delay or mislead diagnosis of appendicitis and to confirm safety of a laparoscopic approach in dealing with a left-sided appendicitis case (Yang et al. in J Emerg Med 43:980-2, 2012. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.11.056). We report a case of left-sided appendicitis in a 12-year-old child managed successfully via a laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSION: Appendicitis remains the most common abdominal-related emergency that needs urgent surgery (Akbulut et al. in World J Gastroenterol 16:5598-5602, 2010. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5598). Left-sided appendicitis is a rare (Hu et al. in Front Surg 2022. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.896116, Hu et al. in Front Surg 9:896116, 2022. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.896116) and atypical presentation and has rarely been reported. Awareness regarding an anatomical variation of the appendix and diagnostic modalities on a computed tomography scan help avoid delay in diagnosis and management of such a rare entity (Vieira et al. in J Coloproctol 39(03):279-287, 2019. 10.1016/j.jcol.2019.04.003). A laparoscopic approach is a safe approach for management of left-sided appendicitis (Yang et al. in J Emerg Med 43:980-2, 2012. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.11.056, Hu et al. in Front Surg 9:896116, 2022. 10.3389/fsurg.2022.896116).

Impact of spectrum irradiation combined with operative laparoscopy on inflammatory reaction and immune function in children with appendicitis / 中国内镜杂志

Objective To study the effect of spectrum irradiation combined with operative laparoscopy on inflammatory reaction and immune function in children with appendicitis.Methods 120 children with appendicitis from January 2022 to January 2023 were selected as the study subjects,randomly divided them into two groups using a random number table method:the control group(n = 60)and the study group(n = 60).The control group underwent laparoscopic minimally invasive appendectomy,and the study group underwent spectrum irradiation combined with laparoscopic minimally invasive appendectomy.The two groups compared perioperative recovery,procalcitonin(PCT),C-reactive protein(CRP)level,cellular immune function(CD4+,CD8+,and CD4+/CD8+),humoral immune function[immunoglobulin M(IgM),immunoglobulin G(IgG),C3,and C4],pain visual analogue scale(VAS),Alvarado score,and treatment effect and postoperative complication rate.Results Compared with the control group,the study group showed a significant reduction in the time to first anal exhaust and hospital stay after surgery,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with preoperative levels,the levels of PCT and CRP in both groups of patients increased at 12 and 24 h postoperatively,with the highest levels occurring at 12 h postoperatively;The PCT and CRP levels in the study group were lower than those in the control group at 12 and 24 h after surgery,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with preoperative data,the CD4+,CD8+,and CD4+/CD8+ levels decreased in both groups at 12 and 24 h postoperatively,with the lowest levels observed at 12 h postoperatively;The CD4+,CD8+,and CD4+/CD8+ levels in the study group were higher than those in the control group at 12 and 24 h after surgery,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with preoperative levels,the levels of IgM,IgG,C3,and C4 in both groups of patients decreased after surgery,with the lowest levels occurring 12 h after surgery;The levels of IgM,IgG,C3,and C4 in the study group were higher than those in the control group at 12 and 24 h after surgery,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with preoperative conditions,the VAS and Alvarado scores in both groups of patients decreased at 12 and 24 h after surgery.The VAS and Alvarado scores of the study group were lower than those of the control group at 12 and 24 h after surgery,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with the control group,the study group had a higher overall effective rate and a lower total incidence of complications,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Spectrum irradiation combined with operative laparoscopy can reduce postoperative inflammatory reaction,and improve immune function in children with appendicitis,shorten inflammatory reaction and immunosuppression time,reduce pain,and have a low incidence of postoperative complications,with ideal effect.

AI-augmented clinical decision in paediatric appendicitis: can an AI-generated model improve trainees' diagnostic capability?

Accurate diagnosis of paediatric appendicitis remains a challenge due to its diverse clinical presentations and reliance on subjective assessments. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with an expert's ''clinical sense'' has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Artificial Intelligence Pediatric Appendicitis Decision-tree (AiPAD) model in enhancing the diagnostic capabilities of trainees and compare their performance with that of an expert supervisor. Between March 2019 and October 2022, we included paediatric patients aged 0-12 years who were referred for suspected appendicitis. Trainees collected clinical findings using five predefined parameters before ordering any imaging studies. The AiPAD model, which was blinded to the surgical team, made predictions from the supervisor's and trainees' findings independently. The diagnosis verdicts of the supervisor and the trainees were statistically evaluated in comparison to the prediction of the AI model, taking into account the revealed correct diagnosis. A total of 136 cases were included, comprising 58 cases of acute appendicitis (AA) and 78 cases of non-appendicitis (NA). The supervisor's correct verdict showed 91% accuracy compared to an average of 70% for trainees. However, if trainees were enabled with AiPAD, their accuracy would improve significantly to an average of 97%. Significantly, a strong association was observed between the expert's clinical sense and the predictions generated by AiPAD. CONCLUSION:  The utilisation of the AiPAD model in diagnosing paediatric appendicitis has significant potential to improve trainees' diagnostic accuracy, approaching the level of an expert supervisor. This hybrid approach combining AI and expert knowledge holds promise for enhancing diagnostic capabilities, reducing medical errors and improving patient outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Sharpening clinical judgement for pediatric appendicitis takes time and seasoned exposure. Traditional training leaves junior doctors yearning for a faster path to diagnostic mastery. WHAT IS NEW: • AI-generated models unlock the secrets of expert intuition, crafting an explicit guide for juniors to rapidly elevate their diagnostic skills. This leapfrog advancement empowers young doctors, democratizing medical expertise and paving the way for brighter outcomes in clinical training.

Interpretable and intervenable ultrasonography-based machine learning models for pediatric appendicitis.

Appendicitis is among the most frequent reasons for pediatric abdominal surgeries. Previous decision support systems for appendicitis have focused on clinical, laboratory, scoring, and computed tomography data and have ignored abdominal ultrasound, despite its noninvasive nature and widespread availability. In this work, we present interpretable machine learning models for predicting the diagnosis, management and severity of suspected appendicitis using ultrasound images. Our approach utilizes concept bottleneck models (CBM) that facilitate interpretation and interaction with high-level concepts understandable to clinicians. Furthermore, we extend CBMs to prediction problems with multiple views and incomplete concept sets. Our models were trained on a dataset comprising 579 pediatric patients with 1709 ultrasound images accompanied by clinical and laboratory data. Results show that our proposed method enables clinicians to utilize a human-understandable and intervenable predictive model without compromising performance or requiring time-consuming image annotation when deployed. For predicting the diagnosis, the extended multiview CBM attained an AUROC of 0.80 and an AUPR of 0.92, performing comparably to similar black-box neural networks trained and tested on the same dataset.

[Association of the Pediatric Appendicitis Score with hospital stay and postoperative complications]. / Asociación de la Escala pediátrica de apendicitis con la estancia hospitalaria y las complicaciones postoperatorias.

Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common surgical emergency in children. Assessment scales improve the timely detection of cases. Objective: To evaluate the association of the Pediatric Appendicitis Scale (PAS) with hospital stay (HS) and postoperative complications of appendectomy. Material and methods: Observational, analytical, longitudinal and retrolective study. Patients from 2 months to 15 years of age, without comorbidities, who underwent appendectomy for complicated (CAA) and uncomplicated (UCAA) acute appendicitis were included. PAS score prior to an appendectomy was obtained, and the time of HS and postoperative complications were evaluated. Results: 64 patients were evaluated, age 8 (IQR 8-12) years, PAS score 6 (IQR 4-8). The time from the onset of symptoms to the request for care in the emergency department was shorter (p < 0.0001) and the total neutrophil count was higher (p = 0.001) in the CAA group. No difference was shown in the PAS score between patients with CAA and UCAA (6 [4-7] vs. 7 [4-8], p = 0.087]. A PAS score ≥ 7 was associated with an increased risk of prolonged HE (p = 0.007), but was not associated with postoperative complications. The PAS score alongside the time elapsed from the onset of symptoms until the assistance in the Pediatric Emergency Department, were associated with an increased risk of prolonged HE (R2 = 0.2246, p = 0.003). Conclusions: A PAS score ≥ 7 is associated with prolonged HS, likewise, the PAS score alongside the time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and assistance in emergency care is associated with prolonged HS.

Introducción: la apendicitis aguda (AA) es la patología quirúrgica de urgencia más común en niños. Las escalas de valoración mejoran la detección oportuna de casos. Objetivo: evaluar la asociación de la Escala pediátrica de apendicitis (PAS) con la estancia hospitalaria (EH) y las complicaciones postoperatorias de apendicectomía. Material y métodos: estudio observacional, analítico, longitudinal y retrolectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes de 2 meses a 15 años, sin comorbilidades, intervenidos por apendicectomía por apendicitis aguda complicada (AAC) y no complicada (AANC). Se obtuvo el puntaje PAS previo a apendicectomía y se evaluó la EH y complicaciones postoperatorias. Resultados: se evaluaron 64 pacientes, edad 8 (RIC 8-12) años, puntaje de PAS 6 (RIC 4-8). El tiempo desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta la atención en urgencias fue menor (p < 0.0001) y la cuenta de neutrófilos totales fue mayor (p = 0.001) en el Grupo de AAC. No hubo diferencia en el puntaje PAS entre pacientes con AAC y AANC (6 [4-7] frente a 7 [4-8], p = 0.087). El puntaje PAS ≥ 7 se asoció con incremento del riesgo de EH prolongada (p = 0.007), pero no con complicaciones postoperatorias. El puntaje PAS en conjunto con el tiempo transcurrido desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta la atención en Urgencias Pediátricas se asoció a incremento del riesgo de EH prolongada (R2 = 0.2246, p = 0.003). Conclusiones: el puntaje PAS ≥ 7 se asocia con EH prolongada, y el puntaje PAS en conjunto con el tiempo transcurrido entre el inicio de síntomas y la atención en urgencias se asocia a EH prolongada.

Clinicopathological Profile of Appendicular Disease in Children: A Tertiary Health Care Center Study.

Background Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common surgical emergency worldwide. Delay in diagnosis of disease often leads to serious complications such as perforation appendicitis (PA) and gangrenous appendicitis (GA). Aims and objectives The purpose of the study is to document clinicopathological outcomes in pediatric age group patients in a tertiary health care center. Material and method This study was a prospective observation study of 50 patients with pediatric appendicitis who had undergone emergency appendectomy from January 2022 to December 2022. All pediatric patients below 15 years of age with a diagnosis of AA were included. Institute ethical permission was granted before the study, and parent consent was taken for the surgery and also for inclusion in the study. After proper resuscitation, all patients underwent appendectomy, and necessary specimens were sent for histological examination. Based on histopathology reports, all patients were classified into four groups: AA, PA, GA, and normal appendix (NA). Results Out of 50 patients, 33 (66%) patients were males and 17 (34%) patients were females. The mean age of the patients was 10.22 ± 2.73 years. The mean age of AA, PA, GA, and NA patients were 10.25 ± 2.6 years, 9.78 ± 2.99 years, 10.00 ± 4.6 years, and 12.00 ± 2.8 years, respectively. The mean duration of symptoms at the time of hospital admission was 2.42 ± 0.97 days for histopathologically proven AA patients, 4.67 ± 2.1 days for GA patients, 2.8 ± 0.83 for PA patients, and one day for NA patients. Overall clinical presentation was right iliac fossa (RIF) pain in 36 (72%) patients, migration of pain in 31 (62%) patients, anorexia in 37 (74%) patients, nausea and vomiting in 43 (86%) patients fever in 26 (52%) patients, RIF tenderness in 50 (100%) patients, rebound tenderness in 39 (78%) patients, guarding in 19 (38%) patients, Psoas's sign in nine (18% patients), and Rovsing's sign in 19 (38%) patients. On histopathological examination of the sent specimen, AA was found in 36 (72%) patients, PA was found in nine (18%) patients, GA was found in three (6%) patients, and NA was found in two (4%) patients. Wound infection was the most common complication and was found in five (10%) patients. The average duration of hospital stay for AA, PA, GA, and NA was 4.33 ± 1.04 days, 9.56 ± 4.2 days, 12.33 ± 8.5 days, and 3.50 ± 0.71 days, respectively. Conclusion The appendicular disease is common in teenage male children. Fever, dehydration, and rebound tenderness at the RIF are clinically significant findings. Duration of symptoms at the time of diagnosis, post-appendectomy complication, and duration of hospital stay significantly correlated with histopathological findings.

Presentation management and outcome of phlegmonous and inflammed appendicitis in children in Ethiopia: retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the leading cause of emergency pediatric surgical admissions in the world. The diagnosis is may be difficult and is often dependent on clinical parameters. This study was aimed at reviewing the clinical presentations, the management and outcomes in children with inflamed and phlegmonous appendicitis with reference to the operative findings. METHODS: The records of 211 children 5 to 15 years of age who were operated for acute appendicitis with intra operative findings of inflamed or phlegmonous appendicitis who met inclusion criteria were entered and analyzed using SPSS (IBM) V.26. Descriptive and regression tests were done with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 211 children with inflamed and phlegmonous appendicitis, the M: F was 1.48:1 with a median age of 11 years. 58.3% of them presented within 24 h with the commonest symptoms being right lower abdominal pain, anorexia, and vomiting (96.2%,96.2%, 85.3%,) respectively. 96.7% of them had right lower abdominal tenderness. 73% had neutrophils ≥ 75%, and of 171 patients who had abdominal ultrasound scan, 97.7% showed appendiceal diameter ≥ 6 mm. Intraoperatively 56.4% of them were found to have phlegmonous appendicitis. In a retrospective Pediatric Appendiceal Score, only 52.6% of patients fall into the high-risk category, who could be confirmed on preoperative clinical assessment. Postoperatively 90% of them discharged improved with a mean hospital stay of 2.26(SD = 0.9) days. There was no association between the sex of the child and the intraoperative finding of inflamed or phlegmonous appendicitis (p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Pediatric appendicitis affects more male children in their second decade of life. Most had phlegmonous appendicitis and presented within 24 h. Duration of illness has little effect on the progress of appendicitis. Surgical management is safe for inflamed and phlegmonous appendicitis with a reasonable hospital stay and a low rate of complications.

Inequities in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis in Tertiary Children's Hospitals and the Consequences of Delayed Diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION: Missed diagnosis (MD) of acute appendicitis is associated with increased risk of appendiceal perforation. This study aimed to investigate whether racial/ethnic disparities exist in the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis by comparing rates of MD versus single-encounter diagnosis (SED) between racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: Patients 0-18 y-old admitted for acute appendicitis from February 2017 to December 2021 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for Emergency Department visits within 7 d prior to diagnosis were evaluated to determine whether the encounter represented MD. Generalized mixed models were used to assess the association between MD and patient characteristics. A similar model assessed independent predictors of perforation. RESULTS: 51,164 patients admitted for acute appendicitis were included; 50,239 (98.2%) had SED and 925 (1.8%) had MD. Compared to non-Hispanic White patients, patients of non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 2.0-3.1), Hispanic (2.1, 1.8-2.5), and other race/ethnicity (1.6, 1.2-2.1) had higher odds of MD. There was a significant interaction between race/ethnicity and imaging (P < 0.0001). Among patients with imaging, race/ethnicity was not significantly associated with MD. Among patients without imaging, there was an increase in strength of association between race/ethnicity and MD (non-Hispanic Black 3.6, 2.7-4.9; Hispanic 3.3, 2.6-4.1; other 2.0, 1.4-2.8). MD was associated with increased risk of perforation (2.5, 2.2-2.8). CONCLUSIONS: Minority children were more likely to have MD. Future efforts should aim to mitigate the risk of MD, including implementation of algorithms to standardize the workup of abdominal pain to reduce potential consequences of implicit bias.

Appendicitis in Children.

The management of pediatric appendicitis continues to advance with the development of evidence-based treatment algorithms and a recent shift toward patient-centered treatment approaches. Further research should focus on development of standardized institution-specific diagnostic algorithms to minimize rates of missed diagnosis and appendiceal perforation and refinement of evidence-based clinical treatment pathways that reduce complication rates and minimize health care resource utilization.

Bacterial pathogens in pediatric appendicitis: a comprehensive retrospective study.

Background: Appendicitis is a frequent condition, with peak incidences in the second decade of life. Its pathogenesis is under debate, but bacterial infections are crucial, and antibiotic treatment remains essential. Rare bacteria are accused of causing complications, and various calculated antibiotics are propagated, yet there is no comprehensive microbiological analysis of pediatric appendicitis. Here we review different pre-analytic pathways, identify rare and common bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic resistances, correlate clinical courses, and evaluate standard calculated antibiotics in a large pediatric cohort. Method: We reviewed 579 patient records and microbiological results of intraoperative swabs in standard Amies agar media or fluid samples after appendectomies for appendicitis between May 2011 and April 2019. Bacteria were cultured and identified via VITEK 2 or MALDI-TOF MS. Minimal inhibitory concentrations were reevaluated according to EUCAST 2022. Results were correlated to clinical courses. Results: Of 579 analyzed patients, in 372 patients we got 1330 bacterial growths with resistograms. 1259 times, bacteria could be identified to species level. 102 different bacteria could be cultivated. 49% of catarrhal and 52% of phlegmonous appendices resulted in bacterial growth. In gangrenous appendicitis, only 38% remained sterile, while this number reduced to 4% after perforation. Many fluid samples remained sterile even when unsterile swabs had been taken simultaneously. 40 common enteral genera were responsible for 76.5% of bacterial identifications in 96.8% of patients. However, 69 rare bacteria were found in 187 patients without specifically elevated risk for complications. Conclusion: Amies agar gel swabs performed superior to fluid samples and should be a standard in appendectomies. Even catarrhal appendices were only sterile in 51%, which is interesting in view of a possible viral cause. According to our resistograms, the best in vitro antibiotic was imipenem with 88.4% susceptible strains, followed by piperacillin-tazobactam, cefuroxime with metronidazole, and ampicillin-sulbactam to which only 21.6% of bacteria were susceptible. Bacterial growths and higher resistances correlate to an elevated risk of complications. Rare bacteria are found in many patients, but there is no specific consequence regarding antibiotic susceptibility, clinical course, or complications. Prospective, comprehensive studies are needed to further elicit pediatric appendicitis microbiology and antibiotic treatment.

A novel diagnostic scoring system for pediatric appendicitis based on age and sex-adjusted hematological parameters.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis diagnosis can sometimes be a real challenge in pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: To establish the importance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and other hematological parameters adjusted for age and sex in the prediction of acute appendicitis, as well as to describe a new scoring system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of 946 children hospitalized for acute appendicitis were retrospectively analyzed. A scoring system based on NLR, PLR, lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) adjusted for age and sex was developed. RESULTS: Patients were divided into group I, with negative examination, and group II, with acute appendicitis; mean ages were 12.20 ± 2.31 and 11.56 ± 3.11, respectively. Leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, NLR, PLR, LMR and PCR were higher in group II. The scores ranged from 0 to 8 points; 4.5 was determined to be the best cut-off point for acute appendicitis with the highest area under the curve (0.96), sensitivity (94%), specificity (86%), positive predictive value (97.5%), negative predictive value (65%), accuracy (92.6%) and misclassification rate (7.4%). CONCLUSION: The proposed scoring system, calculated based on patient age and gender, can be used for unnecessary surgeries to be avoided.

ANTECEDENTES: El diagnóstico de apendicitis aguda representa un reto en pacientes pediátricos. OBJETIVO: Establecer la importancia del índice neutrófilos-linfocitos (INL), índice plaquetas-linfocitos (IPL) y otros parámetros hematológicos ajustados por edad y sexo en la predicción de apendicitis aguda, así como describir un nuevo sistema de calificación. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se analizaron retrospectivamente expedientes clínicos de 946 niños hospitalizados por apendicitis aguda. Se desarrolló un sistema de calificación basado en INL, IPL, ILM y proteína C reactiva (PCR) ajustados por edad y sexo. RESULTADOS: Los pacientes se dividieron en grupo I de exploración negativa y grupo II de apendicitis aguda; las medias de edad correspondientes fueron 12.20 ± 2.31 y 11.56 ± 3.11. El recuento leucocitario, porcentaje de neutrófilos, INL, IPL, ILM y PCR fueron superiores en el grupo II. La calificación osciló entre 0 y 8 puntos; se determinó que 4.5 fue el mejor punto de corte para apendicitis aguda con mayor área bajo la curva (0.96), sensibilidad (94 %), especificidad (86 %), valor predictivo positivo (97.5 %), valor predictivo negativo (65 %), precisión (92.6 %) y tasa de clasificación errónea (7.4 %). CONCLUSIÓN: El sistema de calificación que se propone, calculado por edad y sexo de los pacientes, se puede utilizar para evitar cirugías innecesarias.

Nuevo sistema de calificación diagnóstica para apendicitis pediátrica basado en parámetros hematológicos ajustados por edad y sexo / A novel diagnostic scoring system for pediatric appendicitis based on age and sex-adjusted hematological parameters

Resumen Antecedentes: El diagnóstico de apendicitis aguda representa un reto en pacientes pediátricos. Objetivo: Establecer la importancia del índice neutrófilos-linfocitos (INL), índice plaquetas-linfocitos (IPL) y otros parámetros hematológicos ajustados por edad y sexo en la predicción de apendicitis aguda, así como describir un nuevo sistema de calificación. Material y métodos: Se analizaron retrospectivamente expedientes clínicos de 946 niños hospitalizados por apendicitis aguda. Se desarrolló un sistema de calificación basado en INL, IPL, ILM y proteína C reactiva (PCR) ajustados por edad y sexo. Resultados: Los pacientes se dividieron en grupo I de exploración negativa y grupo II de apendicitis aguda; las medias de edad correspondientes fueron 12.20 ± 2.31 y 11.56 ± 3.11. El recuento leucocitario, porcentaje de neutrófilos, INL, IPL, ILM y PCR fueron superiores en el grupo II. La calificación osciló entre 0 y 8 puntos; se determinó que 4.5 fue el mejor punto de corte para apendicitis aguda con mayor área bajo la curva (0.96), sensibilidad (94 %), especificidad (86 %), valor predictivo positivo (97.5 %), valor predictivo negativo (65 %), precisión (92.6 %) y tasa de clasificación errónea (7.4 %). Conclusión: El sistema de calificación que se propone, calculado por edad y sexo de los pacientes, se puede utilizar para evitar cirugías innecesarias.

Abstract Background: Acute appendicitis diagnosis can sometimes be a real challenge in pediatric patients. Objective: To establish the importance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and other hematological parameters adjusted for age and sex in the prediction of acute appendicitis, as well as to describe a new scoring system. Material and methods: Medical records of 946 children hospitalized for acute appendicitis were retrospectively analyzed. A scoring system based on NLR, PLR, lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) adjusted for age and sex was developed. Results: Patients were divided into group I, with negative examination, and group II, with acute appendicitis; mean ages were 12.20 ± 2.31 and 11.56 ± 3.11, respectively. Leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, NLR, PLR, LMR and PCR were higher in group II. The scores ranged from 0 to 8 points; 4.5 was determined to be the best cut-off point for acute appendicitis with the highest area under the curve (0.96), sensitivity (94%), specificity (86%), positive predictive value (97.5%), negative predictive value (65%), accuracy (92.6%) and misclassification rate (7.4%). Conclusion: The proposed scoring system, calculated based on patient age and gender, can be used for unnecessary surgeries to be avoided.

The utility of sonographic signs to diagnose simple and complicated appendicitis in children.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is classified into simple (SA) and complicated (CA). Ultrasound scans (USS) can be useful in clinically equivocal cases, by visualising primary and secondary signs. This study explores the utility of sonographic signs to diagnose and differentiate appendicitis in children. METHODS: Single-centre retrospective cohort study over a 2-year period. Consecutive USS for suspected appendicitis were included; sonographic signs were extracted from standardised institutional worksheets. USS results were compared with pre-defined intraoperative criteria for SA and CA, confirmed with histological analysis. Data are reported as median [interquartile range], percentages (number), area under the curve (AUC), conventional diagnostic formulae and adjusted odds ratios following multiple logistic regression (p < 0.05 considered significant). RESULTS: A total of 934 USS were included, with median age 10.7 [8.0-13.4] years, majority were female (54%). One quarter (n = 226) had SA, 12% (n = 113) had CA, 61% (n = 571) had no appendectomy and 3% (n = 24) had negative appendicectomy. Appendix visualisation rate on USS was 61% (n = 569), with 62% (n = 580) having a conclusive report. Sonographic signs suggesting appendicitis included an appendiceal diameter > 7 mm (AUC 0.92, [95% CI: 0.90-0.94]), an appendicolith (p = 0.003), hyperaemia (p = 0.001), non-compressibility (p = 0.029) and no luminal gas (p = 0.004). Secondary sonographic signs included probe tenderness (p < 0.001) and peri-appendiceal echogenic fat (p < 0.001). Sonographic signs suggesting CA over SA comprised a diameter > 10.1 mm (AUC 0.63, [95% CI: 0.57-0.69]), an appendicolith (p = 0.003) and peri-appendiceal fluid (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Presence of specific sonographic signs can aid diagnosis and differentiation of simple and complicated appendicitis in children.

Racial and insurance status disparities in imaging modality among pediatric patients diagnosed with appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Studies have assessed the type of diagnostic imaging used in the treatment of appendicitis in children. Few studies investigated racial/ethnic and insurance disparities in imaging modalities used in pediatric patients diagnosed with appendicitis. Our study seeks to determine whether race/ethnicity and insurance status are associated with imaging modality chosen for pediatric patients diagnosed with appendicitis in the emergency department. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 2010 to 2019. We included children <18 years old with a ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis of appendicitis. Exposures were patient race/ethnicity and insurance status. Outcome of interest was imaging modality. We conducted adjusted survey logistic regression to evaluate the patient characteristics and receipt each of the imaging modalities among those with a diagnosis of appendicitis. RESULTS: Of 308,140,115 emergency department (ED) visits, 1,126,865 (0.37%) had a diagnosis of appendicitis. Overall, male patients were more likely to receive CAT scan in comparison to female children (OR=2.52, 95% CI= 1.16-5.49). Additionally, Hispanic children who had significantly greater odds of obtaining ultrasound (OR= 4.56, 95% CI=1.09-19.12). Hispanic children were also less likely to receive x-ray (OR= 0.31, 95% CI=0.11-0.89) or computed tomography (CT) scans (OR= 0.23, 95% CI=0.07-0.76). Children diagnosed with appendicitis who had insurance other than private, Medicare, Medicaid, or self-pay were significantly more likely to receive x-ray studies (OR=4.39, 95% CI= 1.23-15.69). CONCLUSIONS AND GLOBAL HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrated the presence of racial/ethnic and insurance status disparities in the imaging modality chosen to assist in diagnosing appendicitis in pediatric patients.

Structured coaching as a means to improve sonographic visualization of the appendix: a quality improvement initiative.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound of the right lower quadrant for appendicitis requires specific training and practice. Improved visualization of the appendix can result in decreased utilization of computed tomography. Increasing the sensitivity of ultrasound for appendicitis thus decreases radiation exposure, reduces cost, and improves the patient healthcare experience in accordance with the three principles of the triple aim designated by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a structured training program supplemented by technologist feedback on sonographic visualization of the appendix in a large pediatric health system. METHODS: The baseline ultrasound visualization frequency was computed for 20 ultrasound technologists in a large pediatric health system. Following this, technologists were informed of their individual and relative performance. Those with visualization frequencies less than 75% were provided structured training by a designated sonographer with an appendix visualization frequency above 75% while those with greater than 75% visualization continued to be monitored and informed of their monthly frequency. Following this structured training, appendix visualization frequencies were monitored over the next 5 months. RESULTS: There was no significant effect of sonographer career experience on the baseline appendix visualization frequency. Fourteen of 20 technologists demonstrated improved visualization frequencies post-intervention. The composite visualization frequency among these 20 technologists improved from 66.55 to 69.14%. This resulted in a potential savings of 38 CT scans during the post-intervention period. CONCLUSION: An appendix visualization rate monitoring program coupled with structured training was successful in improving the appendix visualization rate throughout a large pediatric health system. This program demonstrates the positive effect that monitoring and targeted intervention can have on a quality improvement program. The program continues to be carried out as part of a plan-study-do-act cycle.

Pediatric Appendicitis Score or Ultrasonography? In Search of a Better Diagnostic Tool in Indian Children with Lower Abdominal Pain.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the performance of pediatric appendicitis score (PAS) in diagnosing acute appendicitis in the children with lower abdominal pain and correlated with ultrasound findings; and to assess the impact of the PAS on clinical outcome and its efficacy in differentiating between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. METHODS: A prospective study was done which included cases of lower abdominal pain. Appendectomy was done for PAS ≥ 6, and diagnosis was confirmed on histopathology. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was created to assess the PAS performance. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosing appendicitis were assessed, and analysis of agreement between ultrasonography and PAS score was done by kappa statistics. RESULTS: Of 260 cases with lower abdominal pain, 205 were suspected of having appendicitis. One hundred fifty-nine had PAS ≥ 6. There were 2/159 (1.26%) cases of negative appendectomies and 2/46 (4.34%) cases of missed appendicitis. The mean PAS was significantly higher in patients with appendicitis than in those without appendicitis. The area under the ROC curve was 0.9925. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of PAS were 98.74%, 95.65%, 95.7% and 95.65%, respectively. Complicated appendicitis had significantly more PAS, fever, and cough tenderness than uncomplicated appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography were 86.79% and 17.39%, respectively. Agreement between ultrasonography-proven appendicitis and PAS-dependent appendicitis was weak. CONCLUSION: PAS has high efficacy in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clinical outcome was more favorable with the use of PAS. Ultrasonography should be used judiciously and in combination with clinical judgment.