Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 843
Filtrar
1.
Indian J Orthop ; 58(9): 1239-1247, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39170655

RESUMO

Introduction: Needlestick and sharps injuries (NSSIs) represent an existential occupational hazard risk to orthopaedic surgeons during their career due to the interaction with various devices, instruments and bone fragments. Consequently, NSSIs have the potential to transmit infections such as Hepatitis B (HBV), Hepatitis C (HCV) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) leading to serious illness. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to identify the clinical settings predisposing orthopaedic surgeons to NSSIs and assess their adherence to safety protocols in the Indian context. Materials and Methods: An online cross-sectional survey of 618 orthopaedic surgeons in India, stratified by experience into two groups: under five years and with 5 years or more was undertaken. The data were collected via an expert-validated online questionnaire to evaluate demographic distribution, injury characteristics, knowledge of safety protocols, and adherence to these protocols. Descriptive statistics summarized the data, Chi-square tests assessed variable associations, and odds ratios were computed for significant variables. Ethical integrity was maintained via electronic informed consent and for confidentiality assurances. Results: The study revealed that orthopaedic surgeons with less than 5 years of clinical experience had higher risks for NSSIs as compared to those with 5 or more years of clinical practice. Conversely, the latter group was more susceptible to bone spike injuries and viral positive needlestick incidents. The analysis shows that whilst the more experienced practitioners displayed greater proficiency in the application of universal precautions and NSSI prevention, they were also less likely to report injuries, often due to discomfiture. Risk profiles were consistent across different practice settings and affiliations, regardless of experience level. Conclusion: This cross-sectional study reveals less experienced orthopaedic surgeons face higher risks of NSSIs, possibly due to inadequate education or awareness. More experienced practitioners encounter distinct risks, likely owing to long-term exposure and traditional practices. There is an immediate need to raise awareness of the potential risks of NSSIs, enhanced education, appropriate training, collaboration with the hospital risk management team and developing a culture of transparent reporting to mitigate these risks. The emphasis should be on reducing the incidence and fostering open reporting of NSSIs to protect clinicians and promote health safety.

2.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 92, 2024 Aug 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39192375

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prevention of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) transmission in the healthcare setting is a priority in Infection Control practices. A cornerstone of this policy is contact tracing of nosocomial contacts after an unexpected MRSA finding. The objective of this retrospective study was to quantify the rates of MRSA transmission in different clinical settings. METHODS: This multi-centre study included MRSA contact screening results from two regional hospitals and one academic hospital. MRSA contact tracing investigations from 2000 until 2019 were reviewed and post-contact screening results were included of index patients with an MRSA-positive culture and their unprotected contacts. Available typing results were used to rule out incidental findings. RESULTS: Of 27,377 contacts screened after MRSA exposure, 21,488 were Health Care Workers (HCW) and 4816 patients. Post-contact screening was initiated for a total of 774 index cases, the average number of screened contacts per index case was 35.7 (range 1 to 640). MRSA transmission was observed in 0.15% (41) of the contacts, 19 (0.09%) HCW and 22 (0.46%) patients. The number needed to screen to detect one MRSA transmission was 667. The highest risk of MRSA transmission occurred during patient-to-patient contacts, with transmission rates varying from 0.32 to 1.32% among the participating hospitals. No transmissions were detected in HCW (n=2834) in the outpatient setting, and the rate of transmissions among HCW contacts on the wards was 0.13% (19 of 15,874). Among 344 contacts of patients with contact precautions, no transmissions were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Reconsidering current MRSA contact tracing practices may lead to a more targeted approach with a lower number needed to screen.


Assuntos
Busca de Comunicante , Infecção Hospitalar , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoal de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Idoso , Adulto Jovem
3.
Pain Physician ; 27(S6): S1-S94, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39133736

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The frequency of performance of interventional techniques in chronic pain patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy continues to increase. Understanding the importance of continuing chronic anticoagulant therapy, the need for interventional techniques, and determining the duration and discontinuation or temporary suspension of anticoagulation is crucial to avoiding devastating complications, primarily when neuraxial procedures are performed. Anticoagulants and antiplatelets target the clotting system, increasing the bleeding risk. However, discontinuation of anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs exposes patients to thrombosis risk, which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality, especially in those with coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease. These guidelines summarize the current peer reviewed literature and develop consensus-based guidelines based on the best evidence synthesis for patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy during interventional procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Review of the literature and development of guidelines based on best evidence synthesis. OBJECTIVES: To provide a current and concise appraisal of the literature regarding the assessment of bleeding and thrombosis risk during interventional techniques for patients taking anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet medications. METHODS: Development of consensus guidelines based on best evidence synthesis included review of the literature on bleeding risks during interventional pain procedures, practice patterns, and perioperative management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy. A multidisciplinary panel of experts developed methodology, risk stratification based on best evidence synthesis, and management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy. It also included risk of cessation of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy based on a multitude of factors. Multiple data sources on bleeding risk, practice patterns, risk of thrombosis, and perioperative management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy were identified. The relevant literature was identified through searches of multiple databases from 1966 through 2023. In the development of consensus statements and guidelines, we used a modified Delphi technique, which has been described to minimize bias related to group interactions. Panelists without a primary conflict of interest voted on approving specific guideline statements. Each panelist could suggest edits to the guideline statement wording and could suggest additional qualifying remarks or comments as to the implementation of the guideline in clinical practice to achieve consensus and for inclusion in the final guidelines, each guideline statement required at least 80% agreement among eligible panel members without primary conflict of interest. RESULTS: A total of 34 authors participated in the development of these guidelines. Of these, 29 participated in the voting process. A total of 20 recommendations were developed. Overall, 100% acceptance was obtained for 16 of 20 items. Total items were reduced to 18 with second and third round voting. The final results were 100% acceptance for 16 items (89%). There was disagreement for 2 statements (statements 6 and 7) and recommendations by 3 authors. These remaining 2 items had an acceptance of 94% and 89%. The disagreement and dissent were by Byron J. Schneider, MD, with recommendation that all transforaminals be classified into low risk, whereas Sanjeeva Gupta, MD, desired all transforaminals to be in intermediate risk. The second disagreement was related to Vivekanand A. Manocha, MD, recommending that cervical and thoracic transforaminal to be high risk procedures.Thus, with appropriate literature review, consensus-based statements were developed for the perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulants and antiplatelets These included the following: estimation of the thromboembolic risk, estimation of bleeding risk, and determination of the timing of restarting of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.Risk stratification was provided classifying the interventional techniques into three categories of low risk, moderate or intermediate risk, and high risk. Further, on multiple occasions in low risk and moderate or intermediate risk categories, recommendations were provided against cessation of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. LIMITATIONS: The continued paucity of literature with discordant recommendations. CONCLUSION: Based on the review of available literature, published clinical guidelines, and recommendations, a multidisciplinary panel of experts presented guidelines in managing interventional techniques in patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy in the perioperative period. These guidelines provide a comprehensive assessment of classification of risk, appropriate recommendations, and recommendations based on the best available evidence.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Assistência Perioperatória , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor/normas , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Sociedades Médicas/normas
4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(8)2024 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39134332

RESUMO

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors, in the form of injectable monoclonal antibodies, are a newer class of drugs for the prevention of migraine headaches. In clinical trials, they have been found to be effective with good tolerance and few adverse effects. Alopecia has been increasingly noted as a post-marketing event associated with CGRP inhibitor injectables. Of the case reports available on this topic, alopecia has commonly been localised to the scalp and associated with erenumab use; however, not as much has been reported for fremanezumab nor for injection site-related alopecia. We report an occurrence of persistent lower extremity localised injection site alopecia in a patient within our headache clinic who used fremanezumab. The possible mechanism of alopecia may be related to the failure of hair follicle immune privilege in the absence of CGRP immunomodulatory effects.


Assuntos
Alopecia , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Humanos , Alopecia/induzido quimicamente , Alopecia/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Reação no Local da Injeção , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina/antagonistas & inibidores , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto
5.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(8)2024 Aug 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39117364

RESUMO

A 22-kg female in early childhood with a history of reactive airway disease presented to a paediatric emergency department with acute shortness of breath, tachypnoea and wheezing. Despite treatment with albuterol and corticosteroids, her bronchospasm persisted, prompting the administration of terbutaline. The patient received 220 mcg (10 mcg/kg) terbutaline intravenously, followed immediately by an inadvertent supratherapeutic intravenous dose of 10 000 mcg (454.5 mcg/kg). The patient's laboratory results obtained minutes after the medication error were notable for: potassium, 3.1 mmol/L, lactate, 2.6 mmol/L and troponin I, 0.30 ng/mL (normal <0.03 ng/mL). Over the next 48 hours, serial serum troponin values decreased. The patient was discharged home approximately 72 hours after the initial presentation and she remained well based on follow-up calls over the next several months. Given the timing and trend of troponin concentrations, we do not believe the terbutaline overdose to be responsible for the myocardial injury.


Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Terbutalina , Humanos , Terbutalina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Administração Intravenosa , Troponina I/sangue , Pré-Escolar
6.
Cureus ; 16(6): e62768, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39036126

RESUMO

Background Healthcare-associated infection (HAI) risk extends beyond patients to healthcare workers and medical students. However, many HAIs are preventable by adhering to standard infection control precautions (SICPs). This study assesses medical students' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding SICPs at the College of Medicine, King Saud University. Methodology A cross-sectional study was undertaken at the College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, involving interns and medical students from years 1 to 5. The researchers constructed and validated an electronic questionnaire, which was used for data collection from December 2022 to June 2023. The estimated sample size was 371 students and interns, stratified by sex and educational level. The data collected included demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding SICPs. Results Out of 371 participants, approximately a quarter (25.1%) had a good knowledge score, 25.6% had a positive attitude, and 26.7% had good infection control practice. There was an association between good knowledge and male gender; being in clinical years 3, 4, 5, and interns; and attending infection control training (p < 0.05). A significant difference in practice was noted among females (p = 0.002). Conclusions This study showed low-to-moderate knowledge, attitude, and practice toward SICPs. These findings indicate a gap between the recommended guidelines and their implementation in healthcare settings, highlighting the necessity for integrating infection control education throughout the medical curriculum. Further research involving a larger sample from multiple institutions is warranted.

7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995330

RESUMO

The goal of this American Rhinologic Society expert practice statement (EPS) is to summarize the best available evidence regarding postoperative precautions for patients following endoscopic skull base surgery for intradural pathology. These topics include the administration of postoperative nasal hygiene; patient mobilization and activity level; the resumption of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea; and the timing and capacity with which a patient may be subjected to barotrauma, such as air travel postoperatively. This EPS was developed following the recommended methodology and approval process as previously outlined. Given the diverse practices and limited agreement on the accepted principles regarding postoperative precautions for patients following skull base surgery, this EPS seeks to summarize the existing literature and provide clinically relevant guidance to bring clarity to these differing practice patterns. Following a modified Delphi approach, four statements were developed, all of which reached consensus. Because of the paucity of literature on these topics, these statements represent a summation of the limited literature and the experts' opinions. These statements and the accompanying evidence are summarized below, along with an assessment of future needs.

8.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(7)2024 Jul 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39038870

RESUMO

Glucocorticoid-induced neuropsychiatric side effects have been known since their initial usage and frequently manifest in clinical settings. Despite this, they remain unpredictable, variable and complex to manage, impacting patient outcomes and the healthcare system.We report a case of glucocorticoid-induced psychosis after the administration of dexamethasone post-neurosurgical intervention and its evolution with the initiation of chemotherapy. Although initially manic symptoms were prominent, with the beginning of chemotherapy psychotic symptoms dominated the clinical presentation, followed by depressive symptoms. Despite challenges in diagnosis and management, including adverse reactions to antipsychotic treatment, this case provides critical insights into the variable and dynamic nature of neuropsychiatric side effects induced by glucocorticoids.


Assuntos
Dexametasona , Glucocorticoides , Psicoses Induzidas por Substâncias , Humanos , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Psicoses Induzidas por Substâncias/etiologia , Psicoses Induzidas por Substâncias/diagnóstico , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
9.
Cureus ; 16(6): e62413, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39011209

RESUMO

Orthopedic implant removal is a common surgery performed either due to patient's complaint of pain, dysfunction or infection or on doctor's advice depending on the nature of the implant and its related future problems. The surgery may range from simple k-wire removal to difficult plate or intramedullary nail removal. Many unforeseen complications are experienced during implant removal, and occasionally, it results in failure of removal, fracture, prolonged per-operative bleeding and damage to nerves and vessels. We report here an unusual complication of coiling of a thick k-wire used during implant extraction surgery to prevent sinking of the nail and the difficulties in removing this coil and the nail, along with the precautions to be taken to avoid such difficulties.

10.
Euro Surveill ; 29(27)2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38967016

RESUMO

BackgroundEffective pandemic preparedness requires robust severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) surveillance. However, identifying SARI patients based on symptoms is time-consuming. Using the number of reverse transcription (RT)-PCR tests or contact and droplet precaution labels as a proxy for SARI could accurately reflect the epidemiology of patients presenting with SARI.AimWe aimed to compare the number of RT-PCR tests, contact and droplet precaution labels and SARI-related International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes and evaluate their use as surveillance indicators.MethodsPatients from all age groups hospitalised at Leiden University Medical Center between 1 January 2017 up to and including 30 April 2023 were eligible for inclusion. We used a clinical data collection tool to extract data from electronic medical records. For each surveillance indicator, we plotted the absolute count for each week, the incidence proportion per week and the correlation between the three surveillance indicators.ResultsWe included 117,404 hospital admissions. The three surveillance indicators generally followed a similar pattern before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The correlation was highest between contact and droplet precaution labels and ICD-10 diagnostic codes (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.84). There was a strong increase in the number of RT-PCR tests after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.DiscussionAll three surveillance indicators have advantages and disadvantages. ICD-10 diagnostic codes are suitable but are subject to reporting delays. Contact and droplet precaution labels are a feasible option for automated SARI surveillance, since these reflect trends in SARI incidence and may be available real-time.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Respiratórias , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Pandemias , Criança , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vigilância da População/métodos , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Incidência , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Lactente , Estudo de Prova de Conceito , Adulto Jovem , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/epidemiologia , Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave/diagnóstico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
11.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 73, 2024 Jul 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971822

RESUMO

The implementation of isolation precautions for patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pending test results is resource intensive. Due to the limited availability of single-bed rooms at our institution, we isolated patients with suspected COVID-19 together with patients without suspected COVID-19 on-site in multiple-bed rooms until SARS-CoV-2-test results were available. We evaluated the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to individuals sharing the room with patients isolated on-site. This observational study was performed at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, from 03/20 - 11/20. Secondary attack rates were compared between patients hospitalized in multiple-bed rooms and exposed to individuals subjected to on-site isolation precautions (on-site isolation group), and patients exposed to individuals initially not identified as having COVID-19, and not placed under isolation precautions until the diagnosis was suspected (control group). Transmission events were confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. Among 1,218 patients with suspected COVID-19, 67 (5.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 21 were isolated on-site potentially exposing 27 patients sharing the same room. Median contact time was 12 h (interquartile range 7-18 h). SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified in none of the patients in the on-site isolation group vs. 10/63 (15.9%) in the control group (p = 0.03). Isolation on-site of suspected COVID-19-patients in multiple-bed rooms avoided single-room occupancy and subsequent in-hospital relocation for many patients without confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection. The absence of secondary transmission among the exposed patients in the on-site isolation group allows for assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of this strategy given the limitation of a small sample size.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Isolamento de Pacientes , Quartos de Pacientes , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/transmissão , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Feminino , Masculino , Suíça/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hospitais Universitários
12.
J Clin Nurs ; 33(9): 3526-3538, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38887821

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Strict patient isolation in hospital is associated with adverse health outcomes. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence for effective interventions to improve safety and quality of care for these patients. AIMS: To identify patient reported areas for improvement in the care of patients in hospital isolation and to determine the feasibility of collecting patient reported outcomes using validated tools. METHODS: Design An exploratory mixed methods study. Setting A major metropolitan teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Participants Patients in hospital isolation for transmissible infections. Data collection Data were collected by (1) phone interviews with patients in isolation and (2) seven validated measurement tools to assess cognition, loneliness, nutritional status, quality of life, anxiety and depression and physical activity. Data were collected between September and December 2021. Data analysis Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively including participant characteristics and outcome data. RESULTS: Participants identified areas for improvement including activities to decrease boredom, more contact with staff to mitigate loneliness and increase comfort care, and formalised communication about clinical treatment and discharge plan. Patients with gastrointestinal symptoms were happier to be alone. There were operational challenges within the health service including delays and miscommunication. Only 70% of the participants completed all questionnaires. CONCLUSION: This study identified areas for improvement in care of patients in isolation and demonstrated that collecting patient reported outcomes using validated tools was feasible. The results of this research will inform development of an intervention to manage adverse effects. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Patients in hospital isolation require additional consideration to ensure that their needs are met to avoid adverse outcomes. The patient experience and comfort can be negatively affected when fundamental care is lacking. REPORTING METHOD (EQUATOR): EQUATOR guidelines for Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation & Health Sciences (MMR-RHS). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Thirteen patients in hospital isolation agreed to participate in this study, sharing their experiences through interviews and assessment.


Assuntos
Isolamento de Pacientes , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isolamento de Pacientes/psicologia , Isolamento de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Isolamento de Pacientes/métodos , Idoso , Adulto , Saúde Mental , Austrália , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente
13.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy ; 17: 1599-1618, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38894815

RESUMO

Introduction: Standard precautions are crucial for infection control in healthcare. Studies show public hospitals' adherence, but data on private hospitals are scarce. Understanding this disparity is vital for safety, policy, and better patient outcomes. Hence, this study aimed to assess precautions and associated factors among healthcare workers at public and private hospitals in Northeast Ethiopia. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study compared healthcare institutions. A total of 470 workers participated via stratified random sampling. Data collection used a pre-tested questionnaire and observation checklist. Epi data managed entry, while STATA analyzed. Binary logistic regression determined significance (P<0.05) for variables. Results: The overall adherence to standard precautions was 51.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.9-56.2). At public and private hospitals, it was 52.2% (95% CI: 45.6-58.6) and 60.4% (95% CI: 53.9-66.9), respectively. In public hospitals adherence was affected by female sex [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.58; 95% CI: 1.32-5.02], availability of written guidelines [AOR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.62-5.94], having good knowledge [AOR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.03-4.11] and favorable attitude towards standard precautions [AOR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.14-4.27]. In private hospitals, it was affected by the availability of running tape water [AOR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.10-5.04], personal protective equipment (AOR: 2.22; 95% CI; 1.01-4.93), color-coded dust bins [AOR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.04-5.21], having good knowledge [AOR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.07-4.13] and favorable attitude [AOR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.39-4.97]. Conclusion: The adherence to standard precautions was higher among private than public hospital healthcare workers in Dessie City, Ethiopia. Thus, ensuring adequate availability of personal protective equipment, safety materials, and running tap water in working rooms, particularly in public hospitals is highly recommended. The initiatives aimed at promoting adherence to standard precautions should be designed and put into action for public hospitals.

14.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 592, 2024 Jun 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886634

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As an emerging infectious disease with a heterogenous and uncertain transmission pattern, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created a catastrophe in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and posed a significant challenge to infection control practices (ICPs) in healthcare settings. While the unique characteristics of psychiatric patients and clinical settings may make the implementation of ICPs difficult, evidence is lacking for compliance with ICPs among healthcare workers (HCWs) in a psychiatric setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional multi-method study based on participant unobtrusive observation coupled with the completion of a self-administered ICP survey was conducted to assess compliance with ICPs among HCWs in a psychiatric inpatient ward in a regional hospital. An online checklist, called eRub, was used to record the performance of HCWs in hand hygiene (HH) and other essential ICPs. Furthermore, a well-validated questionnaire (i.e., Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale, CSPS) was used to collect the participants' self-reported ICP compliance for later comparison. RESULTS: A total of 2,670 ICP opportunities were observed from January to April 2020. The overall compliance rate was 42.6%. HCWs exhibited satisfactory compliance to the wearing of mask (91.2%) and the handling of clinical waste (87.5%); suboptimal compliance to the handling of sharp objects (67.7%) and linen (72.7%); and poor compliance to HH (3.3%), use of gloves (40.9%), use of personal protective equipment (20%), and disinfection of used surface/area (0.4%). The compliance rates of the nurses and support staff to HH were significantly different (χ2 = 123.25, p < 0.001). In the self-reported survey, the overall compliance rate for ICPs was 64.6%. CONCLUSION: The compliance of HCWs in a psychiatric inpatient ward to ICPs during the COVID-19 pandemic ranged from poor to suboptimal. This result was alarming. Revisions of current ICP guidelines and policies that specifically target barriers in psychiatric settings will be necessary.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Pessoal de Saúde , Controle de Infecções , Autorrelato , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Feminino , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Higiene das Mãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
Nurs Rep ; 14(2): 1477-1493, 2024 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38921721

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Effort-reward imbalance (ERI) refers to the situation where there is a mismatch between the effort that healthcare workers (HCWs) put into their work and the rewards they receive in return. Burnout, on the other hand, is a psychological syndrome characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. This study aimed to assess the impact of ERI and burnout on the compliance with standard precautions (SPs) among nurses and midwives in Lebanese hospitals under the economic crisis and after the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Cross-sectional correlational study, based on self-administered questionnaire data, measuring the compliance with SPs, ERI, and burnout, in addition to the relationship between these factors, was performed among 409 nurses and midwives, working in Lebanese hospitals. RESULTS: ERI was significantly associated with exposure to burnout among nurses and midwives, and burnout was found to be a significant predictor of nurses and midwives' self-reported adherence with SPs. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the contribution of ERI and burnout to the chain of infection by decreased adherence to infection control SPs of nurses and midwives.

16.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(6)2024 Jun 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38932361

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals' misjudgment of contraindications to vaccination can lead to unnecessary delays or missed vaccinations. It is essential to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards this issue. METHODS: A two-phase cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare professionals in vaccination clinics in Ningbo in 2022. The study data were collected using questionnaires evaluating the knowledge and attitudes of contraindications and precautions to vaccination. Knowledge scores were calculated and a cutoff of 75 was defined for adequate knowledge scores. RESULTS: A total of 761 participants completed the questionnaire on attitudes. The majority of participants (86.20%) considered screening for vaccination contraindications to be the most important aspect of the vaccination administration process. A higher level of work stress was observed among full-time personnel engaged in this work. A total of 301 participants completed the questionnaire on relevant knowledge and practical experience. The median (IQR) total score was 75.00 (21.88). The lowest median score was observed for questions pertaining to disease diagnosis and classification (median: 40.00; IQR: 40.00). Regarding knowledge about vaccination contraindications, the scores for questions regarding national guidelines or vaccine package inserts (median: 85.71; IQR: 14.29) and guidelines from the WHO or ACIP (median: 100.00; IQR: 0.00) were higher than those derived from expert consensuses or literature findings (median: 71.43; IQR: 28.57) (p < 0.001). Higher scores were observed in the age group of 50-59 years, which included those who had received training twice or more times and those with relevant work experience. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge of healthcare professionals working in vaccination clinics related to contraindications and precautions to vaccination is not sufficient, particularly regarding disease diagnosis and classification. Knowledge enhancement through repetitive skill training is required.

17.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(5)2024 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821567

RESUMO

While typically thought of as an illicit substance, oxybate salts or gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) has more recently been prescribed to treat narcolepsy by enhancing night-time sleep resulting in decreased daytime drowsiness. This case involves a college-aged female with prescribed GHB for narcolepsy who took her second nightly dose too early. This resulted in mental depression, respiratory failure, intubation and mechanical ventilation. The patient was successfully extubated in the intensive care unit several hours later with no residual morbidity. We were unable to identify any prior reports of mixed-salt oxybate toxicity following mistimed drug administration. This case should serve as a warning to emergency physicians to be on the lookout for GHB as part of the differential diagnosis for patients with narcolepsy presenting with altered mental status. It should also serve as a warning to patients and prescribers that this medication can have outcomes that require immediate medical intervention.


Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Narcolepsia , Respiração Artificial , Insuficiência Respiratória , Oxibato de Sódio , Humanos , Feminino , Narcolepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Narcolepsia/diagnóstico , Oxibato de Sódio/intoxicação , Oxibato de Sódio/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Respiratória/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Magnésio , Potássio/sangue , Potássio/uso terapêutico , Erros de Medicação
18.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 181: 111989, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38805933

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pandemic public health measures, such as masks and social distancing, present unique challenges for people who are hard-of-hearing. This study sought to understand how adolescents with varying levels of hearing loss would describe their experiences communicating in a classroom environment during a pandemic and its associated public health measures. METHODS: Qualitative study utilizing one-on-one semi-structured interviews conducted from July 2021 to April 2022. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis to conceptualize the main themes from the data. Adolescents ages 12-17 who attended school in person during the COVID-19 pandemic with either normal hearing or; bilateral cochlear implants or; bone-anchored hearing aids or; unilateral moderate to severe (40-70 dB) conductive hearing loss secondary to mastoidectomy, were interviewed. Participants were recruited from BC Children's Hospital Otolaryngology clinic via a convenience sample. RESULTS: Fourteen adolescents were interviewed with a median age of 15, 9 with hearing loss and 5 with normal hearing. Pandemic associated challenges such as masks muffling speech, protocol fatigue, and missing pre-pandemic life were present in both the hearing loss and normal hearing groups. Classroom communication for adolescents with hearing loss was disproportionately affected by pandemic measures, leading to challenges making friends, feeling behind their peers in learning, and listening fatigue. Resilience was noted among adolescents with hearing loss in their ability to adapt to pandemic measures and changing classroom dynamics. For adolescents with unilateral hearing loss, the pandemic provided an improved listening environment via a reduction in background noise. CONCLUSION: Pre-existing classroom communication challenges for adolescents with hearing loss were amplified under pandemic public health measures and shared, in part, by those with normal hearing. These findings can be used to further inform classroom design to the optimize learning environment for deaf and hard of hearing students.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Adolescente , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Comunicação , SARS-CoV-2 , Perda Auditiva/psicologia , Pandemias , Instituições Acadêmicas , Implantes Cocleares , Máscaras , Auxiliares de Audição , Entrevistas como Assunto
19.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(5)2024 May 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38772870

RESUMO

A postpartum woman in her early 40s, with a history of pre-eclampsia and von Willebrand disease (VWD), presented to the emergency room with chest pain suggestive of an acute coronary syndrome. Initial workup revealed an evolving anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on ECG and elevated cardiac biomarkers, confirming myocardial damage. Point-of-care ultrasound showed apical hypokinesis and coronary angiography revealed a distal dissection of the left anterior descending coronary artery. There was TIMI 3 flow and no evidence of plaque rupture. No percutaneous coronary intervention was performed and the patient was managed conservatively.Fibromuscular dysplasia was ruled out on screening CT angiography. Dual antiplatelet therapy was initiated for an amended course of 3 months given the history of VWD. Our patient had an uncomplicated course in the hospital with a downward trend in their cardiac biomarkers, resolving anterior ST elevation on serial ECGs, and no bleeding complications.


Assuntos
Anomalias dos Vasos Coronários , Eletrocardiografia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Doenças de von Willebrand , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Feminino , Adulto , Doenças de von Willebrand/complicações , Doenças de von Willebrand/diagnóstico , Anomalias dos Vasos Coronários/complicações , Anomalias dos Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Anomalias dos Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico , Doenças Vasculares/congênito , Doenças Vasculares/complicações , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Vasculares/diagnóstico , Angiografia Coronária , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico
20.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 18: 1289-1294, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38746646

RESUMO

Background: Millions of acute conjunctivitis cases occur in the United States annually. The impact of COVID-19 mitigation practices on viral conjunctivitis incidence within ophthalmology clinics has not been reported. We hypothesized that viral conjunctivitis rates would decrease with implementation of such practices. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single academic center's ophthalmology clinics. Electronic health record data was queried using ICD-10 diagnostic codes to include 649 patients aged 2-97 with viral, bacterial, or allergic conjunctivitis diagnosed either before (6/1/2018-5/1/2019) or during (6/1/2020-5/1/2021) COVID-19 precautions. Conjunctivitis rates per ophthalmology clinic visit were compared using rate-ratio analysis. Logistic regression evaluated the effects of age, sex, and race among those with conjunctivitis. Results: A total of 66,027 ophthalmology clinic visits occurred during the study period. Viral conjunctivitis rates per visit did not significantly change after enacting COVID-19 mitigation strategies, but allergic conjunctivitis rates significantly increased (viral: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.31, p=0.408; allergic: RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.03, p<0.001). When controlling for time, younger age (≤ median age 55) (p=0.005) and Caucasian race (p=0.009) were associated with higher viral conjunctivitis frequency. Conclusion: Contrary to trends reported in emergency departments, viral conjunctivitis rates within an ophthalmology clinic did not significantly change after COVID-19 mitigation strategies, though allergic conjunctivitis rates increased. Patients' avoidance of emergency departments during the pandemic may have contributed. Further investigation is required to explore variation in ophthalmology patient populations and needs based on care setting.


A retrospective review included 649 patients with viral, bacterial, or allergic conjunctivitis diagnosed at a single center's ophthalmology clinics before (6/1/2018­5/1/2019) or during (6/1/2020­5/1/2021) COVID-19 precautions. Contrary to emergency department experiences, viral conjunctivitis rates did not significantly change after COVID-19 precautions. However, allergic conjunctivitis rates significantly increased. Conjunctivitis presentation in ophthalmology clinics differed from that reported in emergency departments, warranting further evaluation of variation in patient needs by setting.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA