Safety and Effectiveness of Dulaglutide in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Korean Real-World Post-Marketing Study.

BACKGRUOUND: To investigate the real-world safety and effectiveness of dulaglutide in Korean adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: This was a real-world, prospective, non-interventional post-marketing safety study conducted from May 26, 2015 to May 25, 2021 at 85 Korean healthcare centers using electronic case data. Data on patients using dulaglutide 0.75 mg/0.5 mL or the dulaglutide 1.5 mg/0.5 mL single-use pens were collected and pooled. The primary objective was to report the frequency and proportion of adverse and serious adverse events that occurred. The secondary objective was to monitor the effectiveness of dulaglutide at 12 and 24 weeks by evaluating changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c ), fasting plasma glucose, and body weight. RESULTS: Data were collected from 3,067 subjects, and 3,022 subjects who received ≥1 dose (of any strength) of dulaglutide were included in the safety analysis set (53% female, mean age 56 years; diabetes duration 11.2 years, mean HbA1c 8.8%). The number of adverse events reported was 819; of these, 68 (8.3%) were serious adverse events. One death was reported. Adverse events were mostly mild in severity; 60.81% of adverse events were considered related to dulaglutide. This study was completed by 72.73% (2,198/3,022) of subjects. At 12/24 weeks there were significant (P<0.0001) reductions from baseline in least-squares mean HbA1c (0.96%/0.95%), fasting blood glucose (26.24/24.43 mg/dL), and body weight (0.75/1.21 kg). CONCLUSION: Dulaglutide was generally well tolerated and effective in real-world Korean individuals with T2DM. The results from this study contribute to the body of evidence for dulaglutide use in this population.

Safety and effectiveness of rasagiline in patients with Parkinson's disease in Japan: a post-marketing surveillance study.

BACKGROUND: Rasagiline is a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of rasagiline in patients with PD in routine clinical practice in Japan. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study (148 sites) enrolled patients (1 November 2018-31 October 2020) with PD. Patients received rasagiline orally 1 mg once daily; maximum observation period was 24 months. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was evaluated; effectiveness was assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III total score. RESULTS: The safety analysis set comprised 961 patients (mean age, 72.50 years; 53.80% female; mean duration of PD, 6.82 years). Mean treatment duration was 14.74 months, with 42.25% receiving rasagiline for ≥ 19 months; 189 (19.67%) had ≥ 1 ADR. Common ADRs were dyskinesia (4.06%), orthostatic hypotension (2.29%), hallucination (1.87%), visual hallucination, nausea, fall (1.56% each), dizziness (1.35%), and somnolence (1.25%). Mean (standard deviation) UPDRS Part III total score was 28.5 (14.35) at baseline and 25.5 (14.98) at the final assessment. CONCLUSIONS: No new concerns in safety and effectiveness regarding rasagiline in Japanese patients with PD were raised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03727139; Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Clinical Trials Information: JapicCTI-184181.

Safety and Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Korean Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from a Nationwide Post-Marketing Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of empagliflozin in routine clinical settings, we collected and assessed the clinical profiles of Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This was a post-marketing surveillance study of empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg. Information on adverse events and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was collected as safety data sets. Available effectiveness outcomes, including glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, fasting plasma glucose, body weight, and blood pressure, were assessed. RESULTS: The incidence rate of ADRs was 5.14% in the safety dataset (n=3,231). Pollakiuria, pruritis genital, and weight loss were the most common ADRs. ADRs of special interest accounted for only 1.18%, and there were no serious events that led to mortality or hospitalization. In the effectiveness data set (n=2,567), empagliflozin significantly reduced the mean HbA1c level and body weight during the study period by -0.68%±1.39% and -1.91±3.37 kg (both P<0.0001), respectively. In addition, shorter disease duration, absence of dyslipidemia, and higher baseline HbA1c levels were identified as the clinical features characteristic of a "responder" to empagliflozin therapy. CONCLUSION: Empagliflozin is a safe and potent glucose-lowering drug in routine use among Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It is expected to have better glycemic efficacy in Korean patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Sex differences: From preclinical pharmacology to clinical pharmacology.

Sex is a crucial variable to take into account in medical research. In this review, we attempted to present its importance at all stages of research and even during drug's post-marketing surveillance. Most preclinical research studies do not take sex into account while many diseases are known to present sexual dimorphism. However, a shift in thinking occurred since the January 2016 implementation of the US Institutes of Health recommendations to take sex into account in research. Nevertheless, in preclinical studies, the lack of sex-based statistical analyses persists. Moreover, in humans, women are often under-represented in some clinical trials, despite well-identified sexual dimorphism. In addition, some pathologies are subject to social representations of diseases considered "male" or "female" which can also lead to a delay in diagnosis and management for both sexes. Finally, many drug classes may be subject to sex differences in efficacy and safety. For example, women present more adverse events than men, mainly because of different pharmacokinetic parameters. Accounting sex as a variable from the preclinical phase is essential to improve the transposition of observed results and move towards personalized medicine.

Medicines withdrawn in other countries due to safety concerns: should they continue to be available in the Argentine pharmaceutical market? / [Medicamentos retirados en otros países por problemas de seguridad: ¿Deben seguir presentes en el mercado farmacéutico argentino?]

Introduction: Numerous medicines have been withdrawn from the market because of the risks of serious adverse effects. The objective of this study was to identify in the Argentine pharmaceutical market (APM) the presence of medicines withdrawn in other countries due to safety problems, to analyze the information on their risks and to propose recommendations. Method: observational, descriptive study that explored the presence in the APM, until May 2021, of 462 medicines withdrawn in other countries. Those medicines on this list that are present in the APM and that are not currently authorized in countries with high sanitary surveillance were studied. Results: 17 medicines are still present in the APM, one over-the-counter. The package insert for 11 of the 17 medicines does not mention the adverse effects that led to their withdrawal. It was considered that the permanence in the APM of 16 of them should be reassessed. Conclusions: recommendations are made on actions to be taken by the regulatory authorities with the 17 medicines already present in the APM.

Introducción: Numerosos fármacos han sido retirados del mercado por sus riesgos de efectos adversos graves. El objetivo de este trabajo fue identificar en el mercado farmacéutico argentino (MFA) la presencia de medicamentos retirados en otros países por problemas de seguridad, analizar información sobre sus riesgos y proponer recomendaciones. Método: estudio observacional, descriptivo que exploró la presencia en el MFA, hasta mayo de 2021, de 462 medicamentos retirados en otros países. Se estudiaron aquellos medicamentos de esta lista presentes en el MFA y que no estuvieran autorizados actualmente en países de alta vigilancia sanitaria. Resultados: 17 medicamentos siguen presentes en el MFA, uno de venta libre.  El prospecto de 11 de los 17 fármacos no menciona los efectos adversos que motivaron su retiro. Se consideró que la permanencia en el MFA de 16 de ellos debería ser reevaluada. Conclusiones: se realizan recomendaciones sobre acciones a tomar por las autoridades reguladoras con los 17 medicamentos aún presentes en el MFA.

Quality of Life in Japanese Patients with Dysmenorrhea or Endometriosis-Associated Pelvic Pain Treated with Extended Regimen Ethinylestradiol/Drospirenone in a Real-World Setting: A Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Dysmenorrhea and endometriosis are common gynecologic disorders among women of reproductive age that significantly impact health-related quality of life (HRQL) as well as productivity. Although there are treatment options listed in Japanese guidelines, a gap remains in unmet medical needs for maximizing treatment outcome. The extended regimen of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone (EE/DRSP) (taken daily for up to 120 consecutive days) has been available in Japan for treating dysmenorrhea and/or endometriosis-associated pain since 2016. Yet, the effectiveness of its usage on HRQL has not been investigated elsewhere to date. Therefore, in this study, we aim to observe changes in HRQL of Japanese women treated with an extended regimen of EE/DRSP for dysmenorrhea and/or endometriosis-associated pain. METHODS: As part of a 2-year post-marketing surveillance study, women with dysmenorrhea or endometriosis-associated pelvic pain were prescribed extended EE/DRSP during routine clinical practice. Data were collected 1 month before and 3 and 6 months after initiating treatment. Primary outcomes were the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ) (before, during, and after menstruation) in patients with dysmenorrhea, and the Endometriosis Impact Scale (EIS) and European Quality of Life 5-dimensions 5-level instrument (EQ-5D-5L) in patients with endometriosis. RESULTS: The study cohort included 315 patients (mean age 28.9 years) with dysmenorrhea and 262 patients (mean age 31.3 years) with endometriosis. Mean MDQ total scores before and during menstruation decreased significantly after 6 months with extended EE/DRSP; there was no improvement in after-menstruation MDQ score. Mean EIS domain scores improved significantly by 6 months, with improvement in most EIS individual item scores. Mean EQ-5D-5L scores increased slightly during 6 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Extended EE/DRSP treatment improved HRQL outcomes in Japanese women with dysmenorrhea or endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03126747) on June 2017.

[Market surveillance and control of substandard, falsified and unregistered medicines: integrative reviewVigilancia y control de medicamentos subestándar, falsificados y no registrados: una revisión integral]. / Vigilância e controle de medicamentos abaixo do padrão, falsificados e não registrados: revisão integrativa.

Objective: To identify the strategies employed by regulatory systems for the market surveillance and control of substandard, falsified, and unregistered medicines at the regional-global levels, especially regarding drug recall procedures. Method: An integrative literature review was performed. Searches were performed in MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and SciELO to select articles published from 2007 to 2019 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, covering national regulatory system initiatives, with a focus on the recall of substandard, falsified, and unregistered medicines. Results: Of 483 articles initially identified, 21 global, regional, or national scope studies were selected. Prevention, detection, and response strategies, including drug recall, were grouped according to two broad market surveillance and control models (passive-reactive and proactive) used by regulatory systems. These models seem to combine passive and proactive, complementary or concurring actions that varied according to country development level and regulatory capacity. Although considered the most effective response for protection of populations, medicine recall was not implemented in a uniform manner in different regulatory systems as indicated by the studies. Conclusions: Addressing the complexity and magnitude of the problem of substandard, falsified, and unregistered medicines will demand effort, investment, and profound changes in the approaches, processes, and capacity of regulatory systems, with market surveillance and control strategies possibly converging toward a hybrid, multisectoral, multidisciplinary, global, and systemic model of human health protection.

Objetivo: Identificar las estrategias de actuación de los sistemas regulatorios en la vigilancia y control de los medicamentos subestándar, falsificados y no registrados a nivel regional-mundial, especialmente en lo que se refiere a los procesos de retirada de medicamentos del mercado (recall). Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica integral en las bases de datos de MEDLINE a través de PubMed, Embase y SciELO. Se seleccionaron los estudios publicados entre 2007 y 2019, en inglés, portugués y español, en los que se abordaban las estrategias elaboradas por los sistemas regulatorios de los países, con énfasis en la retirada de los medicamentos subestándar, falsificados y no registrados. Resultados: De los 483 estudios identificados inicialmente, se incluyeron 21 publicaciones de ámbito nacional, regional o mundial. Las estrategias de prevención, detección y respuesta, incluida la retirada de medicamentos, se agruparon en dos modelos de actuación (pasivo-reactivo y proactivo) de los sistemas de regulación en la vigilancia y el control de los medicamentos. Estos modelos parecen combinar estrategias pasivas y proactivas, complementarias o concurrentes, que varían según el nivel de desarrollo de los países y su capacidad de regulación. Aunque la retirada de productos se considera la respuesta más eficaz para proteger a la población, según los estudios esta no se ha aplicado de manera uniforme en los sistemas de regulación. Conclusiones: La complejidad y la magnitud del problema de los medicamentos subestándar, falsificados y no registrados exigen esfuerzos, inversiones y cambios profundos en el enfoque, los procesos y las capacidades de los sistemas de regulación; y las estrategias de vigilancia y control del mercado pueden converger hacia un modelo híbrido, multisectorial, multidisciplinar, mundial y sistémico de protección de la salud humana.

Real-world data for golimumab treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis in Japan: interim analysis in post-marketing surveillance.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Golimumab (GLM) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor-α drug approved for treating moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC). A 52-week post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was initiated to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in patients with UC in Japan. We present an interim report of the ongoing PMS. METHODS: Patients received 200 mg of subcutaneous GLM at week 0, 100 mg at week 2, and 100 mg 4 weekly thereafter. The safety analysis set included 392 patients with UC, and the effectiveness analysis set 387 patients. Safety and effectiveness were assessed at week 6. RESULTS: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 8.2% (32/392) and serious ADRs in 4.6% (18/392). The most frequent ADRs were infection and infestation (3.3%), with herpes zoster being the most common. ADRs were significantly higher in patients with concomitant corticosteroid use (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-9.68). No significant difference in ADR incidence was observed between patients aged ≥65 and <65 years (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.35-3.47). Six-week effectiveness of GLM was confirmed by a decrease in the partial Mayo score (-2.3; 95% CI, -2.6 to -2.1) and C-reactive protein levels (-0.64; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.36), including in the biologics-experienced population. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and effectiveness of GLM at week 6 in a real-world setting were demonstrated in patients with UC in Japan. ADR patterns were consistent with previous reports with no new safety signals. Concomitant corticosteroid use may be associated with increased ADR incidence. The final results of the ongoing PMS are necessary for further evaluation.

Vigilância e controle de medicamentos abaixo do padrão, falsificados e não registrados: revisão integrativa / Market surveillance and control of substandard, falsified and unregistered medicines: integrative review / Vigilancia y control de medicamentos subestándar, falsificados y no registrados: una revisión integral

RESUMO Objetivo. Identificar as estratégias de atuação dos sistemas regulatórios na vigilância e controle de medicamentos abaixo do padrão, falsificados e não registrados em nível regional-global, especialmente quanto aos processos de recall. Métodos. Foi realizada uma revisão integrativa da literatura nas bases de dados MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase e SciELO. Foram selecionados estudos publicados no período de 2007 a 2019, em inglês, português e espanhol, que abordavam estratégias desenvolvidas pelos sistemas regulatórios dos países, com foco no recall de medicamentos abaixo do padrão, falsificados e não registrados. Resultados. Dos 483 estudos inicialmente identificados, foram incluídas 21 publicações de alcance global, regional ou nacional. As estratégias de prevenção, detecção e resposta, incluindo o recall, foram agrupadas em dois modelos (passivo-reativo e proativo) de atuação dos sistemas regulatórios na vigilância e controle de medicamentos. Esses modelos parecem combinar estratégias passivas e proativas, complementares ou concorrentes, variando conforme o nível de desenvolvimento dos países e a capacidade regulatória. Embora seja considerado a resposta mais eficaz de proteção da população, o recall não foi implementado de forma uniforme no âmbito dos sistemas regulatórios, segundo os estudos. Conclusões. A complexidade e a magnitude do problema dos medicamentos abaixo do padrão, falsificados e não registrados exigem esforços, investimentos e mudanças profundas na abordagem, nos processos e nas capacidades dos sistemas regulatórios, podendo as estratégias de vigilância e controle do mercado convergir para um modelo híbrido, multisetorial, multidisciplinar, global e sistêmico de proteção da saúde humana.

ABSTRACT Objective. To identify the strategies employed by regulatory systems for the market surveillance and control of substandard, falsified, and unregistered medicines at the regional-global levels, especially regarding drug recall procedures. Method. An integrative literature review was performed. Searches were performed in MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and SciELO to select articles published from 2007 to 2019 in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, covering national regulatory system initiatives, with a focus on the recall of substandard, falsified, and unregistered medicines. Results. Of 483 articles initially identified, 21 global, regional, or national scope studies were selected. Prevention, detection, and response strategies, including drug recall, were grouped according to two broad market surveillance and control models (passive-reactive and proactive) used by regulatory systems. These models seem to combine passive and proactive, complementary or concurring actions that varied according to country development level and regulatory capacity. Although considered the most effective response for protection of populations, medicine recall was not implemented in a uniform manner in different regulatory systems as indicated by the studies. Conclusions. Addressing the complexity and magnitude of the problem of substandard, falsified, and unregistered medicines will demand effort, investment, and profound changes in the approaches, processes, and capacity of regulatory systems, with market surveillance and control strategies possibly converging toward a hybrid, multisectoral, multidisciplinary, global, and systemic model of human health protection.

RESUMEN Objetivo. Identificar las estrategias de actuación de los sistemas regulatorios en la vigilancia y control de los medicamentos subestándar, falsificados y no registrados a nivel regional-mundial, especialmente en lo que se refiere a los procesos de retirada de medicamentos del mercado (recall). Métodos. Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica integral en las bases de datos de MEDLINE a través de PubMed, Embase y SciELO. Se seleccionaron los estudios publicados entre 2007 y 2019, en inglés, portugués y español, en los que se abordaban las estrategias elaboradas por los sistemas regulatorios de los países, con énfasis en la retirada de los medicamentos subestándar, falsificados y no registrados. Resultados. De los 483 estudios identificados inicialmente, se incluyeron 21 publicaciones de ámbito nacional, regional o mundial. Las estrategias de prevención, detección y respuesta, incluida la retirada de medicamentos, se agruparon en dos modelos de actuación (pasivo-reactivo y proactivo) de los sistemas de regulación en la vigilancia y el control de los medicamentos. Estos modelos parecen combinar estrategias pasivas y proactivas, complementarias o concurrentes, que varían según el nivel de desarrollo de los países y su capacidad de regulación. Aunque la retirada de productos se considera la respuesta más eficaz para proteger a la población, según los estudios esta no se ha aplicado de manera uniforme en los sistemas de regulación. Conclusiones. La complejidad y la magnitud del problema de los medicamentos subestándar, falsificados y no registrados exigen esfuerzos, inversiones y cambios profundos en el enfoque, los procesos y las capacidades de los sistemas de regulación; y las estrategias de vigilancia y control del mercado pueden converger hacia un modelo híbrido, multisectorial, multidisciplinar, mundial y sistémico de protección de la salud humana.

Finding Potential Adverse Events in the Unstructured Text of Electronic Health Care Records: Development of the Shakespeare Method.

BACKGROUND: Big data tools provide opportunities to monitor adverse events (patient harm associated with medical care) (AEs) in the unstructured text of electronic health care records (EHRs). Writers may explicitly state an apparent association between treatment and adverse outcome ("attributed") or state the simple treatment and outcome without an association ("unattributed"). Many methods for finding AEs in text rely on predefining possible AEs before searching for prespecified words and phrases or manual labeling (standardization) by investigators. We developed a method to identify possible AEs, even if unknown or unattributed, without any prespecifications or standardization of notes. Our method was inspired by word-frequency analysis methods used to uncover the true authorship of disputed works credited to William Shakespeare. We chose two use cases, "transfusion" and "time-based." Transfusion was chosen because new transfusion AE types were becoming recognized during the study data period; therefore, we anticipated an opportunity to find unattributed potential AEs (PAEs) in the notes. With the time-based case, we wanted to simulate near real-time surveillance. We chose time periods in the hope of detecting PAEs due to contaminated heparin from mid-2007 to mid-2008 that were announced in early 2008. We hypothesized that the prevalence of contaminated heparin may have been widespread enough to manifest in EHRs through symptoms related to heparin AEs, independent of clinicians' documentation of attributed AEs. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a new method to identify attributed and unattributed PAEs using the unstructured text of EHRs. METHODS: We used EHRs for adult critical care admissions at a major teaching hospital (2001-2012). For each case, we formed a group of interest and a comparison group. We concatenated the text notes for each admission into one document sorted by date, and deleted replicate sentences and lists. We identified statistically significant words in the group of interest versus the comparison group. Documents in the group of interest were filtered to those words, followed by topic modeling on the filtered documents to produce topics. For each topic, the three documents with the maximum topic scores were manually reviewed to identify PAEs. RESULTS: Topics centered around medical conditions that were unique to or more common in the group of interest, including PAEs. In each use case, most PAEs were unattributed in the notes. Among the transfusion PAEs was unattributed evidence of transfusion-associated cardiac overload and transfusion-related acute lung injury. Some of the PAEs from mid-2007 to mid-2008 were increased unattributed events consistent with AEs related to heparin contamination. CONCLUSIONS: The Shakespeare method could be a useful supplement to AE reporting and surveillance of structured EHR data. Future improvements should include automation of the manual review process.

Real-world use of temsirolimus in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: recent consideration based on the results of a post-marketing, all-case surveillance study.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective, observational, post-marketing surveillance was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of temsirolimus in patients with renal cell carcinoma in Japan. METHODS: Patients prescribed temsirolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma were registered and received temsirolimus (25 mg weekly, intravenous infusion for 30-60 minutes) in routine clinical settings (observation period: 96 weeks). RESULTS: Among 1001 patients included in the safety analysis data set (median age, 65.0 years; men, 74.8%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, 69.6%), 778 (77.7%) reported adverse drug reactions. The most common (≥10%) all-grade adverse drug reactions were stomatitis (26.7%), interstitial lung disease (17.3%) and platelet count decreased (11.1%). The incidence rate of grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease was 4.5%. The onset of interstitial lung disease was more frequent after 4-8 weeks of treatment or in patients with lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (21.6% for score 0 vs 8.3% for score 4, P < 0.001). Among 654 patients in the effectiveness analysis data set, the response and clinical benefit rates were 6.7% (95% confidence interval 4.9-8.9) and 53.2% (95% confidence interval 49.3-57.1), respectively. The median progression-free survival was 18.3 weeks (95% confidence interval 16.9-21.1). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and effectiveness profile of temsirolimus observed in this study was similar to that observed in the multinational phase 3 study. The results are generalizable to the real-world scenario at the time of this research, and safety and effectiveness of temsirolimus as a subsequent anticancer therapy for renal cell carcinoma warrants further investigation. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01210482, NCT01420601).

Perfil de queixas técnicas relacionadas a seringas hipodérmicas de uso único comercializadas no Brasil após certificação compulsória / Profile of technical complaints related to single use hypodermic syringes marketed in Brazil after compulsory certification

RESUMO A certificação metrológica é uma importante ferramenta de Vigilância Sanitária. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o perfil das notificações de queixas técnicas de seringas hipodérmicas realizadas no Notivisa/Anvisa (Sistema Nacional de Notificações de Eventos Adversos e Queixas Técnicas/Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária) entre 2012 e 2015. As notificações foram analisadas individualmente e classificadas conforme os motivos relatados. Foram avaliadas 4181 notificações, e as queixas mais prevalentes foram: 'produto quebrado na embalagem lacrada' (22%) e 'sujidade/manchas no interior do produto/embalagem' (15,8%). Não foram observadas alterações significativas no perfil das queixas após a certificação compulsória, que, embora imprescindível, não é capaz de substituir o monitoramento pós-comercialização.

ABSTRACT Metrological certification is an important Sanitary Surveillance tool. The objective of this study was to evaluate the profile of notifications of technical complaints of hypodermic syringes performed in Notivisa/Anvisa (Sistema Nacional de Notificações de Eventos Adversos e Queixas Técnicas/Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária) between 2012 and 2015. The notifications were analyzed individually and classified according to the reasons reported. 4181 notifications were evaluated and the most prevalent complaints were: 'broken product in the sealed package' (22%) and 'dirt/stains inside the product/packaging' (15.8%). There were no significant changes in the profile of the complaints after compulsory certification, which, although indispensable, is not capable of replacing post-marketing monitoring.

Post-marketing safety surveillance and reevaluation of Motherwort injection: A clinical study of 10 094 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety profiles of Motherwort injection (MI). METHODS: A multi-center, prospective and drug- derived hospital intensive monitoring method was conducted to assess the safety of MI in real world applications. This study was based on a very large population after the injection was approved and marketed in China. All patients using the injection in participating hospitals were monitored to determine the incidence, pattern, severity and outcome of associated adverse events. RESULTS: The post-marketing surveillance was performed in 10 094 female patients from April to December, 2015. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 0.79¡ë(8/10 094). Among the 8 patients, the reported adverse events mainly included systemic abnormalities, such as fever, chills and eyelid edema; skin and appendages disorders, such as pruritus and rash; gastrointestinal disorders, such as nausea, abdominal distension and pain; heart rate and rhythm disorders, such as palpitation and increased heart rate. All of these ADRs were mild in severity. CONCLUSION: In this study the ADRs incidence rate of MI is very low, which supports that it is generally safe for use in obstetric and gynecological diseases. However, the total number of 8 ADRs recorded over a relatively short time span seems limited, and the low number of reports could not represent an absolute guarantee of safety.

Large-scale surveillance study of the safety and effectiveness of entecavir in Korean patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Entecavir (ETV) is effective and safe antiviral agent against hepatitis B virus (HBV) in clinical and real-world setting but, most studies were performed in single institute or have limitation in patient's number. A large-scale nation-wide real-world surveillance study was carried out to investigate safety, efficacy and clinical effectiveness of ETV in Korean patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: Between 2006 and 2012, 3,444 patients were enrolled from 132 Korean institutions. For the safety assessment, investigators recorded the occurrence of observed and patient-reported adverse events (AEs), as well as laboratory abnormalities. Efficacy, which consisted of change in HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), was evaluated in patients who had received at least 16 weeks of ETV treatment. Overall clinical effectiveness, based on improvement of ALT, HBV DNA and patient's symptoms, was evaluated by physicians. RESULTS: Of the patients, 3,367 were evaluated for safety and 3,115 for efficacy and clinical effectiveness. Three hundred and eighty AEs were reported in 255 cases (7.57%), and 67 adverse drug reactions in 54 cases (1.6%). Serious AEs (SAE) were 19 events in nine cases (0.27%). Serious adverse drug reactions (SADR) were three events in two cases (0.06%), and unexpected SAE/SADR were three events in two cases (0.06%). Medical history and concomitant medications were factors inf luencing incidence rates of AEs. Overall clinical effectiveness rate was 96.53%, which was clinically assessed as marked improved or improved state. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that ETV was well tolerated and clinically effective in Korean patients with CHB in a real-world nation-wide setting.

Queixas técnicas submetidas ao Sistema de Notificação e Investigação em Vigilância Sanitária / Technical complaints submitted to the Regulatory Health Notification and Investigation System

Objetivou-se avaliar as queixas técnicas submetidas ao Sistema de Notificação e Investigação em Vigilância Sanitária entre 2006 a 2014. Pesquisa documental, transversal, quantitativa de um banco de dados secundário público. Identificou-se que das 245.940 notificações encaminhadas, 109.311 eram referentes a queixas técnicas. A região Sudeste apresentou maior repasse de informações (53,5%) e a região Norte maior diferença na quantidade de notificações entre os Estados (coeficiente de variação= 159,2), seguida pela região Nordeste (coeficiente de variação= 124,8). A maioria dos casos de notificações foram de artigos médico-hospitalares (53,09%) e o equipo foi o produto mais notificado (19%). O risco à saúde do paciente foi identificado em 56.777 casos, com maior frequência quanto aos materiais de baixo ou médio risco. Os hospitais da Rede Sentinela foram os principais notificadores. No período analisado houve aumento anual gradativo no número de notificações de queixas técnicas, principalmente de artigos médico-hospitalares utilizados em procedimentos invasivos

This study aimed to evaluate technical complaints submitted to the Regulatory Health Notification and Investigation System between 2006 and 2014 through cross-sectional, quantitative, documental research of a secondary public database. It was identified that, of the 245,940 notifications put forward, 109,311 referred to technical complaints. The Southeast region presented the highest information submission (53.5%) and the North presented the greatest difference in quantity of notifications between states (coefficient of variation = 159.2), followed by the Northeast (coefficient of variation = 124.8). Most of the cases of notifications were on medical articles (53.09%) with equipment being the most notified product (19%). Risk to patient health was identifiedin 56,777 cases, with the highest frequency being in regard to materials of low or medium risk. SentinelaNetwork hospitals were the principal sources of notifications. In the analyzed period there was a gradual annual increase in the number of technical complaint notifications, especially regarding medical articles used in invasive procedures.

Torsades de Pointes after Ondansetron Infusion in 2 Patients.

Drugs that prolong the electrocardiographic QT interval increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias, particularly torsades de pointes. Ondansetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist antiemetic, is one such drug. We present the cases of 2 patients who were given intravenous ondansetron and subsequently developed torsades de pointes. Both had normal QT intervals at baseline but were discovered to have risk factors that predisposed them to drug-induced QT prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias. We briefly review the mechanisms for torsades de pointes caused by QT-prolonging medications, describe characteristics that increase patients' susceptibility to drug-induced QT prolongation, and call attention to the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients who are given ondansetron.

Confounding Variables and the Performance of Triggers in Detecting Unreported Adverse Drug Reactions.

PURPOSE: This study explored the performance of trigger in detecting adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the confounding variables impairing the causal association of the ADRs, and the underreporting rate by hospital health professionals. METHODS: A 6-month cross-sectional study was conducted in a public general hospital. Data collection was conducted in 2 stages: (1) screening of patient hospitalizations to identify suspected ADRs with 9 triggers developed by the Institute of Healthcare Improvement; and (2) chart review to perform the causality assessment of the suspected ADRs identified, to describe the confounding variables associated with detection of suspected ADRs that were not drug induced, and to analyze the positive predictive value of triggers in recognizing ADRs. To estimate the underreporting rate, ADRs detected by using the tool were compared with ADRs reported by health professionals during the same period. FINDINGS: During the study period, 3318 hospitalizations were analyzed. A total of 837 suspected ADRs were identified. However, after causality assessment, 356 were definite ADRs. Confounding variables associated with the detection-suspected ADRs were related to the clinical conditions of inpatients. The use of triggers contributed to increased ADR detection by 10.5%. The performance ranged from 0.00 to 0.75, with an overall positive predictive value of 0.43. Six ADRs were spontaneously reported, of which just 1 was also detected by using the trigger tool. Only 1 of 356 potential ADRs was reported by health professionals. IMPLICATIONS: Findings show that the use of triggers contributes to detecting ADRs underreported by health professionals. However, confounding variables impaired the performance of the tool because they underestimated the causal association. Furthermore, both methods are complementary to early recognition of drug-induced harm and should be applied together in health institutions to contribute to policies of risk management, drug safety, and optimization of pharmacotherapy.

Decision making in drug safety-a literature review of criteria used to prioritize newly detected safety issues.

PURPOSE: In drug safety, there is a lack of guidance on how prioritization of safety issues should be performed. The aim of this literature review is to provide an overview of criteria used for signal prioritization and of the associated decision support frameworks. METHODS: A search strategy was constructed to identify relevant articles in Medline/Embase databases from the period from 1 January 1995 to 31 August 2015. The prioritization criteria were extracted and classified in relevant categories. RESULTS: From an initial set of 63 articles, 11 were retained for full review. The articles mentioned 48 criteria used in the prioritization process, with a median of six criteria per study [range: 1-16]. More than half of the criteria (63%), referred to strength of evidence while 19% related to public health impact, 14% to general public and media attention and 4% to novelty of the drug event association. Fifteen criteria were tested for predictive value with 11 showing positive results, most of them from the strength of evidence category. Six decision-making frameworks are presented, which incorporate criteria from various categories. Five of these frameworks were tested against expert decisions or by other means, but only in one database each and for a limited set of products. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide range of prioritization criteria described in the literature; however, few of them demonstrated predictive value. Many criteria with predictive value were related to strength of evidence category and to novelty. There were few attempts at integrating different criteria in decision support frameworks. Five of the frameworks were tested for validity and showed usefulness, while at least three are already in use for prioritization. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

A Synthesis of Current Surveillance Planning Methods for the Sequential Monitoring of Drug and Vaccine Adverse Effects Using Electronic Health Care Data.

INTRODUCTION: The large-scale assembly of electronic health care data combined with the use of sequential monitoring has made proactive postmarket drug- and vaccine-safety surveillance possible. Although sequential designs have been used extensively in randomized trials, less attention has been given to methods for applying them in observational electronic health care database settings. EXISTING METHODS: We review current sequential-surveillance planning methods from randomized trials, and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) and Mini-Sentinel Pilot projects-two national observational electronic health care database safety monitoring programs. FUTURE SURVEILLANCE PLANNING: Based on this examination, we suggest three steps for future surveillance planning in health care databases: (1) prespecify the sequential design and analysis plan, using available feasibility data to reduce assumptions and minimize later changes to initial plans; (2) assess existing drug or vaccine uptake, to determine if there is adequate information to proceed with surveillance, before conducting more resource-intensive planning; and (3) statistically evaluate and clearly communicate the sequential design with all those designing and interpreting the safety-surveillance results prior to implementation. Plans should also be flexible enough to accommodate dynamic and often unpredictable changes to the database information made by the health plans for administrative purposes. CONCLUSIONS: This paper is intended to encourage dialogue about establishing a more systematic, scalable, and transparent sequential design-planning process for medical-product safety-surveillance systems utilizing observational electronic health care databases. Creating such a framework could yield improvements over existing practices, such as designs with increased power to assess serious adverse events.