Posicionamiento de la Sociedad Española de Infectología Pediátrica sobre la implementación, ejecución y monitorización de los programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos en pediatría hospitalaria / Position statement of the Spanish Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases on the introduction, implementation and assessment of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in hospital paediatrics

Durante los últimos años ha habido un aumento en la aparición de resistencias antimicrobianas, lo cual supone un grave problema de salud pública. El mal uso de antimicrobianos es un factor determinante en su desarrollo. La población pediátrica no queda exenta de dicha problemática ya que la prescripción de antibióticos en pediatría es elevada, y en muchas ocasiones inadecuada.La incorporación de los programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) ha resultado ser una medida crucial para disminuir el riesgo en la aparición de resistencias antibióticas. A nivel internacional se reconoce la necesidad de crear PROA específicos en pediatría (PROA-P) debido a las diferencias existentes entre pacientes adultos y pediátricos en referencia a las infecciones, así como al abordaje tanto diagnóstico como terapéutico de las mismas. Por esta misma razón, los PROA-P deben ser programas multidisciplinares liderados por especialistas en infecciones pediátricas y trabajar con indicadores específicos pediátricos (DOT, patrones de sensibilidad antibiótica de población pediátrica, indicadores clínicos…), que permitan detectar puntos de mejora y establecer estrategias dirigidas eficaces. Por otro lado, es imprescindible el apoyo y liderazgo por parte de las distintas sociedades científicas implicadas.El objetivo de este documento es dar a conocer el posicionamiento de la Sociedad Española de Infectología Pediátrica (SEIP) sobre la implementación de los PROA pediátricos hospitalarios en nuestro territorio, así como aportar herramientas que ayuden en la aplicación de dichos programas en los diferentes hospitales de las distintas regiones sanitarias del país. (AU)

In the past few years, antimicrobial resistance has increased, becoming a serious public health problem. The irrational use of antimicrobials is one of the main contributors to antimicrobial resistance. The paediatric population is not free from this problem, as antimicrobials are widely prescribed in this age group, often inappropriately.The introduction of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) has proven crucial in curbing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. At the international level, the need to develop specific paediatric ASPs has been recognised on account of the differences between adult and paediatric patients as concerns infection and approaches to diagnosis and treatment. For this reason, paediatric ASPs should be multidisciplinary programmes led by paediatric infectious disease specialists and use specific paediatric indicators (such as days of treatment, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in the paediatric population, or clinical indicators) to help identify areas of improvement and develop effective targeted interventions. On the other hand, the support and leadership of the pertinent scientific societies are also essential.The purpose of this document is to present the position of the Sociedad Española de Infectología Pediátrica (SEIP, Spanish Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases) concerning the implementation of paediatric ASPs in hospitals in Spain and to provide tools to facilitate their application in hospitals throughout the regional health care systems in the country. (AU)

Position statement of the Spanish Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases on the introduction, implementation and assessment of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in paediatric hospitals.

In the past few years, antimicrobial resistance has increased, becoming a serious public health problem. The irrational use of antimicrobials is one of the main contributors to antimicrobial resistance. The paediatric population is not free from this problem, as antimicrobials are widely prescribed in this age group, often inappropriately. The introduction of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) has proven crucial in curbing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. At the international level, the need to develop specific paediatric ASPs has been recognised on account of the differences between adult and paediatric patients as concerns infection and approaches to diagnosis and treatment. For this reason, paediatric ASPs should be multidisciplinary programmes led by paediatric infectious disease specialists and use specific paediatric indicators (such as days of treatment, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in the paediatric population, or clinical indicators) to help identify areas of improvement and develop effective targeted interventions. On the other hand, the support and leadership of the pertinent scientific societies are also essential. The purpose of this document is to present the position of the Sociedad Española de Infectología Pediátrica (SEIP, Spanish Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases) concerning the implementation of paediatric ASPs in hospitals in Spain and to provide tools to facilitate their application in hospitals throughout the regional health care systems in the country.

Adecuacy of pediatric antimicrobial prescribing in the Emergency Department at discharge.

INTRODUCTION: In January 2019, the Community of Madrid's Health Department published a guide about the use of antimicrobials in outpatient children. Taking this regional Guide as reference, this study was aimed at estimating the adequacy of the antimicrobial stewardship at discharge from a pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Secondarily, the differences in adequacy according to the diagnosis and the prescriber were studied, and the agreement between this Guide and the protocols of the ED was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted on patients under 16 years old, with a diagnosis included in the regional Guide who were discharged from a pediatric ED between March of 2018 and February of 2019. Prescription was considered adequate when the indication, the antibiotic and the posology (dosage, dosing interval, length of treatment and route of administration) were correct. RESULTS: 165 out of 648 (25,5%) infectious diseases processes analyzed received antimicrobial treatment. In 23 processes treated with antimicrobial, the adequacy could not be evaluated due to the absence of data necessary to assess any aspect of posology. Therapy was considered appropriate in 550/625 processes (88.0%). When antimicrobial treatment was prescribed, 70/142 (49.3%) were appropriate and no statistically significant differences in adequacy were found between prescribers. Posology was the worst handled point of the prescription (26.3%). Tract urinary infection, conjunctivitis and otitis media were the pathologies with the lowest adecuacy (44.4%; 50.0% and 52.2%) and presented the highest discrepancy between the Guide and the center protocols (κ = 0.308; κ = 0.000; κ = 0.586). CONCLUSIONS: The adequacy of the management of infectious processes to the reference Guide in our pediatric ED was high, but it was below 50% when antimicrobial treatment was required. The degree of adequacy to the local protocols of the center was greater than to the regional Guide. This reveals a discrepancy between the 2 documents that should be analyzed and corrected according to the available scientific evidence.

Adecuación de la prescripción de antimicrobianos en procesos ambulatorios atendidos en Urgencias / Adecuacy of pediatric antimicrobial prescribing in the Emergency Department at discharge

Introducción: En enero del 2019 la Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid publicó una guía acerca del uso de antimicrobianos en niños con tratamiento ambulatorio. El objetivo de este trabajo fue estimar la adecuación de la prescripción de antimicrobianos al alta desde el Servicio de Urgencias Pediátricas (SUP) en pacientes con enfermedades infecciosas, tomando como referencia esta guía regional. Secundariamente, se estudió la variación en la adecuación según el diagnóstico realizado y el facultativo prescriptor, y se valoró la concordancia entre dicha guía y los protocolos del centro. Material y métodos:Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo en el que se incluyó a pacientes de 0-16 años con diagnóstico al alta del SUP incluido en la guía regional, entre marzo del 2018 y febrero del 2019. La prescripción se consideró adecuada cuando lo era la indicación, y en su caso, el fármaco elegido, la posología (dosis, intervalo y duración) y la vía de administración. Resultados: Se obtuvo una muestra de la que se analizaron 648 procesos infecciosos, siendo tratados con antimicrobianos 165 (25,5%). En 23 procesos no pudo evaluarse la adecuación a la guía por ausencia de algún dato posológico de la prescripción de antimicrobiano. El manejo terapéutico fue adecuado globalmente en 550/625 procesos (88,0%). En los procesos tratados con antimicrobiano, la adecuación fue de 70/142 (49,3%), sin encontrarse diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre facultativo prescriptor. El motivo de inadecuación más frecuente fue el error posológico (26,3%). Infección urinaria, conjuntivitis y otitis media aguda fueron las entidades clínicas con peor adherencia (el 44,4, el 50,0 y el 52,2% respectivamente) y en las que existió una mayor discrepancia entre guía y protocolos (κ=0,308; κ=0,000; κ=0,586). (AU)

Introduction: In January 2019, Community of Madrid's Health Department published a guide about the use of antimicrobials in outpatient children. Taking this regional Guide as reference, this study was aimed at estimating the adequacy of the antimicrobial stewardship at discharge from a pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Secondarily, the differences in adequacy according to the diagnosis and the prescriber were studied, and the agreement between this Guide and the protocols of the ED was assessed. Material and methods: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted on patients under 16 years old, with a diagnosis included in the regional Guide who were discharged from a pediatric ED between March of 2018 and February of 2019. Prescription was considered adequate when the indication, the antibiotic and the posology (dosage, dosing interval, length of treatment and route of administration) were correct. Results: 165 out of 648 (25,5%) infectious diseases processes analyzed received antimicrobial treatment. In 23 processes treated with antimicrobial, the adequacy could not be evaluated due to the absence of data necessary to assess any aspect of posology. Therapy was considered appropriate in 550/625 processes (88.0%). When antimicrobial treatment was prescribed, 70/142 (49.3%) were appropriate and no statistically significant differences in adequacy were found between prescribers. Posology was the worst handled point of the prescription (26.3%). Tract urinary infection, conjunctivitis and otitis media were the pathologies with the lowest adecuacy (44.4%; 50.0% and 52.2%) and presented the highest discrepancy between the Guide and the center protocols (k=0.308; k=0.000; k=0.586). (AU)

[Adecuacy of pediatric antimicrobial prescribing in the Emergency Department at discharge]. / Adecuación de la prescripción de antimicrobianos en procesos ambulatorios atendidos en Urgencias.

INTRODUCTION: In January 2019, Community of Madrid's Health Department published a guide about the use of antimicrobials in outpatient children. Taking this regional Guide as reference, this study was aimed at estimating the adequacy of the antimicrobial stewardship at discharge from a pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Secondarily, the differences in adequacy according to the diagnosis and the prescriber were studied, and the agreement between this Guide and the protocols of the ED was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted on patients under 16 years old, with a diagnosis included in the regional Guide who were discharged from a pediatric ED between March of 2018 and February of 2019. Prescription was considered adequate when the indication, the antibiotic and the posology (dosage, dosing interval, length of treatment and route of administration) were correct. RESULTS: 165 out of 648 (25,5%) infectious diseases processes analyzed received antimicrobial treatment. In 23 processes treated with antimicrobial, the adequacy could not be evaluated due to the absence of data necessary to assess any aspect of posology. Therapy was considered appropriate in 550/625 processes (88.0%). When antimicrobial treatment was prescribed, 70/142 (49.3%) were appropriate and no statistically significant differences in adequacy were found between prescribers. Posology was the worst handled point of the prescription (26.3%). Tract urinary infection, conjunctivitis and otitis media were the pathologies with the lowest adecuacy (44.4%; 50.0% and 52.2%) and presented the highest discrepancy between the Guide and the center protocols (k=0.308; k=0.000; k=0.586). CONCLUSIONS: The adequacy of the management of infectious processes to the reference Guide in our pediatric ED was high, but it was below 50% when antimicrobial treatment was required. The degree of adequacy to the local protocols of the center was greater than to the regional Guide. This reveals a discrepancy between the 2documents that should be analyzed and corrected according to the available scientific evidence.

Evaluación del consumo de antimicrobianos en una Unidad de Neonatologia: un trabajo en equipo para promover el uso racional de antimicrobianos / Evaluation of antimicrobial consumption in a Neonatology Unit: a team work to promote the rational use of antibiotics

Resumen Antecedentes: Los antimicrobianos (ATM) son uno de los medicamentos más utilizados en recién nacidos (RN) hospitalizados. El uso indiscriminado de ATM trae consecuencias negativas como son el predominio de bacterias resistentes a los ATM usualmente utilizados y asociaciones individuales a morbilidad relevante como son la displasia broncopulmonar, enterocolitis necrosante, sepsis tardía y/o muerte. Objetivo: Registrar y evaluar las tendencias del uso de ATM a lo largo del tiempo en RN hospitalizados en el Servicio de Neonatología (SRN) del Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sótero del Río, con el fin de objetivar los cambios en la práctica habitual de la indicación de ATM. Un objetivo secundario fue evaluar el impacto de estas conductas sobre la resistencia antimicrobiana. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte, prospectivo, observacional, unicéntrico, en todos los pacientes hospitalizados entre enero de 2011 y diciembre de 2014. Se registró el peso al nacer, días de hospitalización, indicación y días de uso de ATM para cada paciente. El uso de ATM fue cuantificado por medio de distintas tasas: días de indicación de un o más ATM para el consumo global (TUA), sumatoria total de días de uso (STUA) como para los ATM más frecuentemente utilizados. Cada tasa calculada por 100 días hospitalizados. Además, se registró la susceptibilidad antimicrobiana de las bacterias más frecuentemente aisladas en nuestro servicio: Staphylococcus coagulasa negativa (SCN) y bacilos gramnegativos (BGNs). Resultados: El 34,7% de los pacientes hospitalizados recibió algún tipo de antimicrobiano, correspondiendo 32,3% a antibacterianos. El ATM más utilizado fue ampicilina (20,2% del total) y luego cefadroxilo (11,6%). El TUA no cambió entre 2011 y 2014. La STUA disminuyó en 10,7% entre 2011 y 2014 (p < 0,05). En el análisis por rangos de peso, en el grupo < 750 g disminuyó la tendencia de uso de vancomicina (descenso de uso en 9,9%) y un aumento de 18,8% para metronidazol. Por otra parte, hubo un aumento en el uso del régimen de piperacilina/tazobactam en el grupo > 1.500 g. Al evaluar la susceptibilidad antimicrobiana, hubo una disminución de la susceptibilidad a cloxacilina en SCN entre 2011 y 2014 desde 27 a 10,3%, respectivamente. Para BGN hubo una disminución desde 76,9 a 40,5% en la susceptibilidad a cefalosporinas de tercera generación, principalmente debido a Klebsiella pneumoniae que pasó a ser el BGN predominante, con un aumento de 6,7 a 50% en los años 2011 y 2014, respectivamente. Para Klebsiella pneumoniae la susceptibilidad a cefalosporinas de tercera generación descendió desde 77 a 22%. Por último, amikacina mostró una actividad sobre 85% en todos los BGNs entre 2011 y 2014. Conclusiones: Es recomendable planificar y mantener un registro continuo del consumo de ATM tanto como terapia y profilaxis, idealmente llevar el TUA, el STUA y siendo categorizado por tipo de ATM y rango de peso de los RN. En forma concomitante, es de considerable importancia analizar y evaluar la susceptibilidad de microorganismos. Es esencial que un equipo interdisciplinario prepare este registro, y que continuamente proporcione retroalimentación a los profesionales que mantienen el funcionamiento de las unidades de cuidados neonatales.

Background: Antibiotics (ATB) are drugs widely used in hospitalized newborns. The indiscriminate use of ATBs promote the rise of resistant bacteria to the most commonly indicated antimicrobials. In addition, ATB prescription presents associations to morbidity, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, late sepsis and even death. All of the above leads to an increase in health care costs. Aim: To record and to evaluate trends of antibiotic use over time in hospitalized NB in the Neonatology Unit at Dr. Sótero del Río Hospital, in order to objectify the changes in the usual practice of the ATM indication. A secondary objective was to assess its impact on antimicrobial resistance. Methods: Cohort, observational, prospective unicenter study which included all hospitalized patients between January 2011 and December 2014. Birth weight, hospitalization days, ATB indication and days of ATB use were recorded for each patient. The use of ATB was quantified by means of different rates; days of indication of one or more ATBs for global consumption (RUA), total sum of days of use (TSUA) and for the most frequently used ATBs. Each calculated rate for 100 days hospitalized. In addition, the antimicrobial susceptibility of the most frequently isolated bacteria in our service: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (SCN) and Gram-negative bacilli (BGN) were recorded continuously. Results: The 34.7% of the hospitalized patients received some type of antimicrobial agent. ATBs were 32.3% of medicines used. The most widely used was ampicillin (with 20.2% of the total) and cefadroxyl (with 11.6%). The RUA did not change during the study time, but STUA decreased by 10.7% between 2011 and 2014 with p < 0.05. When subgroup analyzes were divided by weight ranges, in the < 750 g group, the use of vancomycin decreased in use by 9.9% and an increase of 18.8% for metronidazole was observed. On the other hand, there was an increase in the use of the piperacillin-tazobactam regimen in the range > 1,500 g. When evaluating antimicrobial susceptibility, there was a decrease in susceptibility for oxacillin in SCN between 2011 and 2014 from 27% to 10.3% respectively. In addition, for Gram negative there was a decrease from 76.9% to 40.5% in susceptibility to third generation cephalosporins, mainly due to Klebsiella pneumoniae, which became the predominantly isolated BGN with an increase of 6.7% to 50% between 2011 and 2014, respectively. For K. pneumoniae the loss of susceptibility to third generation cephalosporins decreased from 77% to 22%. Finally, amikacin showed an activity over 85% in all BGNs between 2011 and 2014. Conclusions: It is advisable to plan and to maintain a continuous record of ATB consumption, as well as therapy and prophylaxis, being categorized by ATB type and range of newborn weight. It is of considerable importance to analyze and to evaluate the susceptibility of microorganisms. It is essential that an interdisciplinary team prepare this recording, and to continuously provide feedback to professionals who maintain the functioning of neonatal care units.