Feasibility of Simultaneous Bilateral Endoscopic Surgery in Prone Split-Leg Position for Bilateral Upper Urinary Tract Calculi: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: We explored the viability of simultaneous bilateral endoscopic surgery (SBES) in the prone split-leg position for managing bilateral calculi. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 72 patients who underwent SBES, with procedures involving ureteroscopy (URS) and contralateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) simultaneously, in prone split-leg position. RESULTS: Operative times averaged 109.38 ± 30.76 min, with an average hospital stay of 7.79 ± 3.78 days. The bilateral stone-free rate (SFR) was 70.83%, while URS and PNL demonstrated comparable unilateral SFR (83.33% and 79.17%, respectively). Receiver operating characteristics curves for predicting unilateral residual fragments yielded an area under the curve of 0.84 (URS) and 0.81 (PNL) with respective cutoff values of stone diameter of 11.55 mm and 23.52 mm. Fifty-seven (79.17%) and 15 (20.83%) patients encountered grade 0-1/2 complications, with no severe complications (grade 3-5) recorded. No significant changes in blood count or renal function were observed post-SBES. CONCLUSIONS: SBES in the prone split-leg position is a viable option for managing bilateral upper tract urolithiasis. Larger scale studies are needed to further assess safety and efficacy in various positions.

The efficacy and safety of one-stage endoscopy combined with intrarenal surgery (mini-nephrostomy tract) in the prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi.

Background: The goal of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) performed in the prone split-leg position for the treatment of complex renal stones. Materials and methods: A mature ECIRS protocol was designed. Retrospective analysis was conducted of medical records between January 2020 and December 2021 of patients with complex renal stones at one center who underwent ECIRS by 2 skilled surgeons using retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone split-leg position. Results: A total of 44 patients were included in this study. Mean stone size was 26.1 ± 12.7 mm, and the number of calyces involved was 4.36 ± 2.09. Mean operative time was 71.1 ± 21.8 minutes. Postoperative decline in hemoglobin was 15.8 ± 9.8 g/L. Seventy-five percent of patients achieved stone-free status. The mean number of residual stones was 2.8 ± 2.3, and the mean residual stone size was 10.30 ± 4.76 mm. Six patients (13.6%) developed postoperative complications, including 4 with fever during the first 2 days postoperatively and 2 patients with transient postoperative pain. No patients developed severe complications. Conclusions: Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone split-leg position can be performed safely by experienced surgeons using retrograde flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy as a successful technique for the treatment of complex renal stones.

Application of a new position in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: modified prone split-leg position.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) is well established as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of multiple urolithiasis. The position is the key to the perfect combination of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia (GMSV) and prone split-leg positions are widely used. However, both positions have their own advantages and disadvantages. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ECIRS in the treatment of multiple urolithiasis in the modified prone split-leg position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 96 patients with multiple urolithiasis underwent ECIRS in modified prone split-leg position from September 2017 to January 2021. Relevant demographic and clinical data were analysed retrospectively. Clinical outcomes, such as the stone free rate, complications and postoperative hospital stay were evaluated. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables and Student's t test was applied for continuous variables of the treatment groups. RESULTS: The mean renal stone size was 32.5 ± 10.7 mm and renal stone surface area was 712.2 ± 264.8 mm2. The mean ureteral stones size was 24.8 ± 12.3 mm. The mean surgical time was 82.2 ± 38.3 min. The incidence of complications was 16.7%, and they were mainly grade 1 and grade 2. No complications occurred above grade 3. The stone was completely removed in 75 (78.1%) patients in a single operation. The risk factors affecting the stone-free rate of ECIRS were analysed, and only the number of involved calyces by stone was found to be significant (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: ECIRS is safe and effective in the treatment of multiple renal calculi or multiple renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi in the modified prone split-leg position. The modification of the prone split-leg position makes the retrograde operation more convenient, which is conducive to the combination of RIRS and PCNL.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy between the prone split-leg and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: A multi-institutional analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the prone split-leg and the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. METHODS: A multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2014 and December 2018. The stone-free and complication rates were compared between the prone split-leg and the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions. Anatomical variations were evaluated using contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: In total, 118 and 100 patients underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone split-leg and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions, respectively. Renal punctures in the prone split-leg position were predominantly executed through the lower calyces (78.0%), whereas those in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position were primarily performed through the middle calyces (64.0%; P < 0.001). Surgical duration in the prone split-leg position was significantly shorter than that in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position (106.5 vs 126.0 min; P = 0.0459). There were no significant differences in the stone-free rate between the two positions (78.8% vs 76.0%; P = 0.629). Incidences of urinary tract injury (P = 0.033) and febrile urinary tract infection (23.7% vs 10.0%; P = 0.011) in the prone split-leg position were significantly higher than that in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position. The tilt of the major renal axis was significantly greater in the prone position than the corresponding values in the oblique position (19.4° vs 8.5°; P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical variation might result in the differences of renal puncture calyx. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position may bring equal stone-free status, with a longer surgical time but fewer complications including febrile urinary tract infection and urinary tract injury than the prone split-leg position.

Comparison of the Prone Split-Leg Position with the Traditional Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.

Background and Objective: Several positions have been described for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the traditional prone position PCNL (TP-PCNL) and the prone split-leg position PCNL (PSL-PCNL). Patients and Methods: A retrospective review was made of the data of 212 patients who underwent prone PCNL in PSL or TP between January 2017 and November 2019. The demographic and preoperative clinical data were used for propensity score-matching (PSM). Following the PSM based on a multivariable logistic regression model, the PSL-PCNL and TP-PCNL groups were compared in preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters. All surgical procedures were performed by an experienced endourologist. Results: After PSM, 51 patients from the PSL-PCNL group were matched to 51 TP-PCNL patients. The stone burden was not statistically significant between the two groups (p = 0.388). The mean operation time of the two groups was significantly different (81.5 ± 32.4 minutes vs 93.1 ± 25.9 minutes, respectively, p = 0.026). The hemoglobin decrease in the PSL-PCNL group was greater than that in the TP-PCNL group (-17.7 ± 16.9 g/L vs 13.1 ± 10.9 g/L, p < 0.001). Both groups had similar stone-free rates after 2 weeks (p = 0.49). No significant difference was observed between the groups in the total complication rate (p = 1). Conclusions: The application of PSL in PCNL simplifies the surgical procedure and shortens the operating time. Another important advantage is that it allows retrograde intrarenal surgery and ureteroscopy to be performed simultaneously. We recommend the PSL to be applied in PCNL for renal stone patients.

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone-split leg position for successful single session removal of an encrusted ureteral stent: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The most serious complication of ureter stent is long-term retention of ureteral stent and stone formation around the stent. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year old female patient with left ureteral stent placed 2 years before developed both pyelic and vesical stones on the two ends of the double J was admitted to our hospital. Intravesical lithotripsy, retrograde ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy were performed with the patient in the prone split-leg position. All the stones and the ureteral stent were successfully removed in a single session. CONCLUSIONS: Combined endoscopic techniques in the prone split-leg position can effectively and safely manage severely encrusted stents.

Clinical application of endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi / 中华泌尿外科杂志

Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi.Methods The clinical data of 56 cases patients with simultaneous renal and ureteral stones admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.A retrospective analysis was performed on 56 cases of patients with simultaneous renal and ureteral stones who received surgical treatment between January 2016 and March 2019.According to different surgical methods,56 cases were divided into the modified prone split-leg position group (observation group)and the traditional pre-lithotomy position followed by prone position group (control group).In observation group,the average age of 11 males and 17 females was (54.1 ± 10.2) years.The mean body mass index was (23.8 ± 2.9) kg/m2.The location of stones were left in 14 cases and right in 14 cases.The average kidney involvement calyces number was 2.4 ± 0.7.The mean kidney stones maximum cross-sectional area was (870.9 ± 157.7) m2.According to the Guy's classification system,there were 3 cases of grade Ⅰ,11 case of grade Ⅱ and 14 case of grade Ⅲ in the observation group.The kidney stones S.T.O.N.E scores was 8.7 ± 1.3 and ureteral calculi S.T.O.N.E scores were 13.1 ± 1.6.In the control group,the average age was (57.0 ± 8.3) years old.The mean body mass index was (24.4 ± 2.9) kg/m2.The average kidney involvement calyces number was 2.1 ± 0.7 and the mean kidney stones maximum cross-sectional area was (808.8 ± 189.6)mm2.To the kidney stones Guy's classification,there were 5 cases of grade Ⅰ,15 case of grade Ⅱ,7 case of grade Ⅲ and 1 case of grade Ⅳ in the control group.The kidney stones S.T.O.N.E scores were 8.5 ±0.6 and the ureteral calculi S.T.O.N.E scores were 12.4 ± 1.7.The operation time,calculus clearance rate,postoperative hospitalization days,reoperation rate and severity of complications of Clavien-Dindo were statistically compared between the two groups.Results The study found that the average operation time in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group [(77.8 ± 27.3) min vs.(94.4 ± 22.8) min] (P ＜ 0.05).In the observation group,23 patients had complete removal of renal and ureteral calculi,and 3 patients need reoperation.While in the control group,16 patients had complete removal and 10 patients had reoperation.There were significant differences between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05).According to the complication severity of Clavien-Dindo,there were 4 cases of grade Ⅰ and 1 case of grade Ⅱ in the observation group,4 cases of grade Ⅰ,2 case of grade Ⅱ and 2 case of grade Ⅲ in the control group.There were no serious complications of grade Ⅳ and Ⅴ in both groups (P ＞0.05).In observation group,one case accepted the DSA embolization therapy due to the severe bleeding.One case accepted the puncture drainage due to the perinephric effusion.There was no difference in average postoperative hospital stay between the two groups [(6.5 ± 1.2) d vs.(7.0 ± 2.1) d,P ＞ 0.05].Conclusions It is safe and feasible to treat complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi by endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position.One position can solve many problems simultaneously,which can significantly reduce the operation time,increase the stone free rates,reduce the reoperation rate and improve the effectiveness of the operation.

Clinical application of endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi / 中华泌尿外科杂志

Objective@#To investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position for complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi.@*Methods@#The clinical data of 56 cases patients with simultaneous renal and ureteral stones admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A retrospective analysis was performed on 56 cases of patients with simultaneous renal and ureteral stones who received surgical treatment between January 2016 and March 2019. According to different surgical methods, 56 cases were divided into the modified prone split-leg position group (observation group) and the traditional pre-lithotomy position followed by prone position group (control group). In observation group, the average age of 11 males and 17 females was (54.1±10.2)years. The mean body mass index was (23.8±2.9) kg/m2. The location of stones were left in 14 cases and right in 14 cases. The average kidney involvement calyces number was 2.4±0.7.The mean kidney stones maximum cross-sectional area was (870.9±157.7)m2. According to the Guy′s classification system, there were 3 cases of grade Ⅰ, 11 case of grade Ⅱ and 14 case of grade Ⅲ in the observation group. The kidney stones S. T.O.N.E scores was 8.7±1.3 and ureteral calculi S. T.O.N.E scores were 13.1± 1.6.In the control group, the average age was (57.0±8.3)years old. The mean body mass index was (24.4±2.9)kg/m2. The average kidney involvement calyces number was 2.1±0.7 and the mean kidney stones maximum cross-sectional area was (808.8±189.6)mm2. To the kidney stones Guy′s classification, there were 5 cases of grade Ⅰ, 15 case of grade Ⅱ, 7 case of grade Ⅲ and 1case of grade Ⅳ in the control group. The kidney stones S. T.O.N.E scores were 8.5±0.6 and the ureteral calculi S. T.O.N.E scores were 12.4±1.7. The operation time, calculus clearance rate, postoperative hospitalization days, reoperation rate and severity of complications of Clavien-Dindo were statistically compared between the two groups.@*Results@#The study found that the average operation time in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group [(77.8±27.3)min vs.(94.4±22.8)min](P<0.05). In the observation group, 23 patients had complete removal of renal and ureteral calculi, and 3 patients need reoperation. While in the control group, 16 patients had complete removal and 10 patients had reoperation. There were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05). According to the complication severity of Clavien-Dindo, there were 4 cases of grade Ⅰ and 1 case of grade Ⅱ in the observation group, 4 cases of grade Ⅰ, 2 case of grade Ⅱ and 2 case of grade Ⅲ in the control group. There were no serious complications of grade Ⅳ and Ⅴ in both groups (P>0.05). In observation group, one case accepted the DSA embolization therapy due to the severe bleeding. One case accepted the puncture drainage due to the perinephric effusion. There was no difference in average postoperative hospital stay between the two groups [(6.5±1.2)d vs.(7.0±2.1)d, P>0.05].@*Conclusions@#It is safe and feasible to treat complex renal calculi with ipsilateral ureteral calculi by endoscopic combined simultaneous surgery in the modified prone split-leg position. One position can solve many problems simultaneously, which can significantly reduce the operation time, increase the stone free rates, reduce the reoperation rate and improve the effectiveness of the operation.