Development and Validation of the Interprofessional Collaboration Practice Competency Scale (IPCPCS) for Clinical Nurses.

Interprofessional collaborative practice is a core competency and is the key to strengthening health practice systems in order to deliver safe and high-quality nursing practice. However, there is no Interprofessional Collaboration Practice Competency Scale (IPCPCS) for clinical nurses in Taiwan. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to develop an IPCPCS and to verify its reliability and validity. This was a psychometric study with a cross-sectional survey using convenience sampling to recruit nurses from the seven hospitals of a medical foundation. A self-designed structured IPCPCS was rolled out via a Google survey. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, principal-axis factoring (PAF) with Promax rotation, Pearson correlation, reliability analysis, and one-way ANOVA. PAF analysis found that three factors could explain 77.76% of cumulative variance. These were collaborative leadership and interprofessional conflict resolution, interprofessional communication and team functioning, and role clarification and client-centered care. The internal consistency of the three factors (Cronbach's α) was between 0.970 to 0.978, and the Pearson correlation coefficients were between 0.814 to 0.883. Significant differences were presented in the IPCPCS score by age, education level, total years of work experience, position on the nursing clinical ladder, and participation in interprofessional education. In conclusion, the three factors used in the IPCPCS have good reliability and construct validity. This scale can be used as an evaluation tool of in-service interprofessional education courses for clinical nurses.

Development of a New Questionnaire to Assess Parental Perceived Barriers When Promoting Healthy Eating Habits in Young Children: First Findings.

Social cognitive models suggest a crucial role played by perceived barriers in promoting healthy behaviors, including healthy eating. We aimed to develop a new questionnaire to assess parental perceived barriers to healthy feeding in young children and perform the instrument's preliminary psychometric evaluation. The initial pool of items was developed based on reviews and qualitative studies. First, we conducted an online, descriptive, cross-sectional study with 278 parents of 2-6-year-old children to examine its factorial structure and internal consistency. Then, a second study with 168 parents from a similar population assessed convergent/discriminant and known-groups validity. The exploratory factorial analysis confirmed the scale's theoretical structure. Five scales were found: Child-Related Barriers, Parent-Related Barriers-Vegetables and Fruit, Parent-Related Barriers-Added Sugars, Social Context-Related Barriers, and Cost-Related Barriers. All scales presented adequate reliability. We found weak to moderate, negative, and significant correlations between child- and parent-related barriers regarding vegetables and fruits, feeding practices to promote children's eating self-regulation, and food parenting self-efficacy. Additionally, parents who perceived their children as easy and well-regulated reported significantly fewer child-related barriers than parents with poorly self-regulated and inhibited children. The results support the instrument's preliminary psychometric adequacy regarding its validity and reliability and corroborate earlier empirical studies about the main parental barriers when promoting young children's healthy eating habits.

Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Work-Related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (WAAQ) in a Colombian sample

The Work-Related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (WAAQ) is a self-report instrument that measures psychological flexibility at work. Although this scale has been validated in some languages, its psychometric properties in Colombia are unknown, making it challenging to assess work-related psychological flexibility in this country. The present study analyzed the psychometric properties and factor structure of the WAAQ in a sample of 985 Colombian workers. The internal consistency of the WAAQ measured through coefficient alpha was .88. The one-factor model with correlated error terms between items 4 and 7 showed a very good fit to the data (RMSEA= 0.033, CFI= .998, NNFI= .997, SRMR= 0.018). The WAAQ showed metric and scalar invariance across gender, age group, socioeconomic stratum, and hierarchical level. Furthermore, it correlated negatively with psychological inflexibility, psychological distress, emotional exhaustion, and cynicism and positively with professional efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction. In conclusion, the WAAQ seems to be a valid self-report of work-related psychological flexibility in Colombian samples (AU)

A New Factor "Otherism" Added to the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities Scale (HEMA) in Chinese Culture.

Due to different understandings of happiness, people adopt different tendencies to act, which is called orientation to happiness (OTH). Our previous study found that OTH had two core themes, Self-focused and Other-focused in Chinese culture, which was different from OTH structures in Western culture. However, no corresponding measurement tool has been developed or revised. The Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities Scale (HEMA) was the most commonly used measurement tool of OTH in recent years. The present study aimed to develop a Chinese version of the HEMA. A total of 1729 Chinese adults participated in this study. The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to examine the underlying structure of the Chinese version of the HEMA. The results supported the 3-factor structure of the translation instrument, and the 15-item scale had good convergent and discriminant validity. The three dimensions were named Hedonism, Eudaimonism, and Otherism. Among them, Otherism is a new dimension, which means "the pursuit of the harmony of the group and achieving happiness by fulfilling their responsibilities in the group". The revised tool was named the Hedonic, Eudaimonic, and Otheristic Motives for Activities Scale-Chinese (HEOMA-C). The results showed that the HEOMA-C has good reliability and validity. Overall, the present study provided an effective tool to assess the OTH in Chinese culture.

Attachment Stability and Longitudinal Prediction of Psychotic-like Symptoms in Community Adolescents over Four Months of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: The Friends and Family Interview (FFI) is assumed to be a valid method to study attachment stability and attachment-related psychopathological processes in adolescence, but no studies have yet tested the test-retest reliability of this interview or the longitudinal association of attachment patterns in response to the FFI from adolescents with symptoms such as psychotic-like experiences (e.g., hallucinations, bizarre behavior, dissociation, self-harm) that are known to have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This study involved 102 community adolescents (M = 14.64, SD = 1.63, 46% males) assessed twice: during a severe COVID-19-related lockdown (in Italy) (T1) and four months later (T2). Measures were the FFI (assessing attachment patterns: secure-autonomous, insecure-dismissing, insecure-preoccupied, and insecure-disorganized) and the thought problems scale of the Youth Self-Report to assess psychotic-like symptoms. Results: revealed high stability of four-way attachment classifications over four months (93.5%), with a modest yet significant link between higher disorganization at T1 and higher scores of thought problems at T2, p = 0.010. Conclusions: The FFI shows high test-retest reliability and can be a valid, age-adapted option to assess adolescents' attachment. Attachment disorganization should be further investigated as possibly related to psychotic-like experiences in community adolescents.

Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección de Abusos Sexuales Infantiles en personas adultas con adicción / Design and validation of a questionnaire for the detection of child sexual abuse in adults with addiction

Introducción y objetivos: el objetivo principal de este trabajo ha sido diseñar y validar un cuestionario específico que evaluara el Abuso Sexual Infantil (ASI) en personas adultas con problemas de adicción. Materiales y método: se diseñó un cuestionario de 120 ítems que medía diferentes secuelas psicopatológicas que están presentes en personas que han sufrido ASI. Se realizó su validación con un grupo de expertos y un estudio piloto en el que participaron 151 personas (68 mujeres y 83 hombres), residentes en España. Para el análisis de datos se usaron diferentes métodos estadísticos. Resultados: los resultados mostraron que el cuestionario se podía reducir a 21 ítems logrando alcanzar unas adecuadas garantías psicométricas, tanto a nivel de validez como de fiabilidad (a = ,872). Conclusiones: El presente instrumento permite la detección de sintomatología relacionada con el ASI, permitiendo al clínico hacer una exploración más amplia en esta área para descartar ASI u otros trastornos y poder mejorar la planificación del tratamiento.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: the main objective of this work has been to design and validate a specific questionnaire to assess Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) in adults with addiction problems. Materials and method: a 120-item questionnaire was designed to measure different psychopathological sequelae that are present in people who have suffered CSA. Validation was carried out with a group of experts and a pilot study in which 151 people (68 women and 83 men) residing in Spain participated. Different statistical methods were used for data analysis. Results: the results showed that the questionnaire could be reduced to 21 items, achieving adequate psychometric guarantees, both in terms of validity and reliability (a = ,872). Conclusions: The present instrument allows the detection of symptoms related to ASI, allowing the clinician to carry out a broader exploration in this area to rule out ASI or other disorders and to improve treatment planning.(AU)

Validity and reliability of the swedish versions of the HLS-EU-Q16 and HLS-EU-Q6 questionnaires.

BACKGROUND: Health Literacy is a crucial factor for health. In Europe, many people have limited health literacy (i.e. difficulties with accessing, understanding, appraising and using health information). This study aimed to evaluate the psychometrics of the Swedish versions of the HLS-EU-Q16 and HLS-EU-Q6, instruments that aims to assess health literacy. METHODS: In this prospective psychometric study convenience sampling was used, which gave a study population of 347 Swedish-speaking adults. The psychometric evaluation included item distributional statistics, construct validity testing, and principal component analysis to assess structural validity. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was also investigated. RESULTS: For the Swedish version of HLS-EU-Q16, no floor effects were detected but a ceiling effect was noted among 28% of the respondents. Construct validity was supported as four out of five expected correlations was confirmed (educational level, self-perceived health, electronic health literacy and HLS-EU-Q6). In terms of structural validity, the principal component analysis yielded a four-factor structure with most items loading significantly only to one factor. The Swedish version of HLS-EU-Q16 had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89, split-half reliability = 0.93) and test-retest reliability showed stability over time (Cohen's κ = 0.822). For the Swedish version of HLS-EU-Q6, neither floor nor ceiling effects were observed. Construct validity was supported as HLS-EU-Q6 correlated as our a priori stated hypothesis. The principal component analysis did not support the unidimensionality of the scale as a two-factor structure was identified. The Swedish version of HLS-EU-Q6 had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.77, split-half reliability = 0.80) and test-retest reliability showed stability over time (Cohen's κ = 0.812). According to the Swedish version of the HLS-EU-Q16, 71% of the participants were classified as having sufficient comprehensive health knowledge (CHL), while only 33% were classified as having this when the HLS-EU-Q6 was used. CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish versions of the HLS-EU-Q16 and HLS-EU-Q6 have acceptable psychometric properties, and based on the results we recommend its use to measure CHL. However, we are hesitant to use Sw-HLS-EU-Q6 in estimating different CHL levels and further studies need to be conducted to establish validity and accuracy of the thresholds of HLS-EU-Q6.

The Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep scale: Dimensions of the European Portuguese DBAS-30 and development of a new short version (DBAS-SF-16).

OBJECTIVES: The Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS) is the most widely validated instrument for assessing sleep-related cognitions. This study aimed to examine the reliability of the DBAS-30 European Portuguese version, explore its dimensionality, and develop a new short version suitable for differentiating the presence/absence of insomnia. METHODS: From 824 participants aged 18-85 years, the Insomnia Group (IG, n = 355, 261 females and 94 males) and Normal Sleepers Group (NSG, n = 292, 237 females, 54 males and 1 with no response) were constituted. Thirty-one patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome were also recruited. For the DBAS 16-items version, the ability to differentiate dysfunctional beliefs between people with and without insomnia was used as the main criterion for item retention. RESULTS: DBAS-30 PT demonstrated good internal consistency and significantly discriminated IG from NSG. Based on a robust EFA (RDWLS), a three-dimensional structure was determined for IG (Ageing and Hopelessness, Sleep Expectations, and Consequences and Helplessness). DBAS-SF-16 presented as an internally-consistent measure with a reliable two-factor structure (Consequences and Helplessness, Medication and Hopelessness) and showed construct and known groups validity. ROC analysis demonstrated DBAS-SF-16's relevant clinical accuracy, and 4.3 provides the best cut-off score in detecting the level of dysfunctional beliefs associated with clinical insomnia. CONCLUSIONS: A new and meaningful dimensionality of the DBAS-30 was found. DBAS-SF-16 showed to be a reliable, valid, and robust tool for evaluating dysfunctional beliefs about insomnia in clinical and non-clinical populations.

Euthanasia Attitudes Questionnaire in Medical Personnel (AHE-PM) / Cuestionario de actitudes hacia la eutanasia en personal médico (AHE-PM)

Abstract The right to die is an international dilemma. Some countries and states already have laws regulating one of the most common applications of this right, the active voluntary euthanasia. The evidence from these countries highlights the importance of a bioethical framework to limit some of its applications. In this regard, the evaluation of attitudes towards euthanasia in medical personnel will allow to understand the attitudes of these professionals and how they can deal with such requests, whether this assisted death is decided by the patients or their surroundings. Consequently, the aim of this study was to develop a brief scale to evaluate attitudes, as well as to determine their significance according to the gender and seniority of the professionals in this situation. A double design strategy was followed. On the one hand, a psychometric design with an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and, on the other, a descriptive analytical design for the comparison of groups. A six-item scale (AE-PM) and two factors were extracted. The first focuses on attitudes towards euthanasia to alleviate suffering for medical reasons and the second one to alleviate the patient's emotional suffering. The scale (AHE-PM) is useful for the rapid exploration of attitudes towards euthanasia in physicians, a professional group with limited free time, who may also encounter relatively frequent requests for active voluntary euthanasia. The two factors obtained allow attitudes to be assessed from a bioethical perspective, providing information on the application under apparent medical justification and in situations based on the patient's subjective emotional suffering.

Resumen La eutanasia voluntaria activa se define como la petición de un paciente que quiere morir y la acción que es llevada a cabo por otra persona para provocar dicha muerte. El derecho a morir es un dilema sobre el que se debate a nivel internacional. Algunos países y estados ya cuentan con leyes que regulan una de las aplicaciones más comunes de este derecho. Los datos aportados por estos países ponen de manifiesto la importancia de un marco bioético que permita limitar algunas de sus aplicaciones. En este sentido, la evaluación de las actitudes hacia la eutanasia en personal médico permitirá conocer las actitudes de estos profesionales y cómo estos pueden enfrentarse a dichas solicitudes, o no, sea de muerte asistida por parte de los pacientes o su entorno. Además, se ha reportado en la bibliografía diferentes actitudes según la experiencia o el sexo de los trabajadores, por lo que es de relevancia su exploración diferencial. Por ello, el objetivo del presente trabajo un instrumento de evaluación de actitudes hacia la eutanasia diseñado y validado por y para profesionales médicos en ejercicio. En esta línea, los objetivos de este estudio son obtener una escala corta con propiedades psicométricas adecuadas, que proporcione información relevante sobre las actitudes hacia la eutanasia, así como la posible evaluación de algunas prácticas médicas relacionadas con ésta que pueden ser bioéticamente dudosas. La muestra estaba compuesta por 419 profesionales de la medicina procedentes de tres provincias del sur de España. Se siguió una doble estrategia en el diseño. Por un lado, un diseño psicométrico con un análisis factorial exploratorio y confirmatorio. Se dividió la muestra en dos submuestras aleatorias para realizar de forma paralela ambos análisis. Se utilizaron los estadísticos KMO, Bartlett, RMSEA, RMRS, CFI, NNFI, GFI y AGFI para explorar el ajuste de modelos. Po otro lado, se utilizó un diseño asociativo descriptivo para la comparación de grupos mediante la t de Student, ANOVA, Tukey y la prueba d de Cohen. Se extrae una escala de seis ítems (AE-PM) y dos factores. El primero de ellos está centrado en las actitudes hacia la eutanasia para aliviar el sufrimiento por cuestiones médicas y el segundo para aliviar el sufrimiento emocional del paciente. Respecto al estudio de las diferencias, no se observaron diferencias significativas según el sexo del profesional ni la antigüedad en la profesión. La escala (AHE-PM) es útil para la exploración rápida de las actitudes hacia la eutanasia en médicos, un grupo profesional con limitado tiempo libre que, además, puede encontrarse con relativa frecuencia ante solicitudes de eutanasia voluntaria activa. Los dos factores obtenidos permiten evaluar, por un lado, las actitudes desde una perspectiva bioética. Es de especial relevancia en estas situaciones el conocimiento de las actitudes del personal médico hacia la eutanasia, exponiéndolo a un dilema bioético y personal. La autoconciencia de estos profesionales sobre sus propias actitudes hacia la eutanasia y su adaptación a los códigos éticos vigentes podría minimizar el impacto generado por estas situaciones y, por tanto, mejorar la relación terapéutica y la calidad asistencial. Por otro lado, el instrumento aporta información sobre la posible recomendación de estas prácticas bajo aparente justificación médica y/o en situaciones basadas en el sufrimiento emocional subjetivo del paciente. Estudios previos indican que los profesionales se ven afectados emocionalmente cuando se enfrentan a los conceptos de muerte y eutanasia en pacientes terminales. En este sentido, la escala también podría servir de evaluación de actitudes y el trabajo en planes de prevención de salud laboral en los centros sanitarios.

Development, psychometric validation, and cross-cultural comparison of the "Instagram Motives Questionnaire" (IMQ) and the "Instagram Uses and Patterns Questionnaire" (IUPQ).

Background and aims: Social network use is widespread, and the study of Instagram seems to have captured more attention in recent years. However, scale development and validation in the field has fallen short of providing sound scales of Instagram motives and usage patterns that consider the uniqueness of Instagram-related behavior. This paper describes the development, psychometric and cross-cultural validation of two new measurement instruments: the "Instagram Motives Questionnaire" (IMQ) and the "Instagram Uses and Patterns Questionnaire" (IUPQ). Methods and results: A preliminary set of items was developed for each questionnaire based on a previous qualitative interview study on Instagram motives, uses, and consequences. In the first study, the questionnaires were distributed to a sample of 312 participants aged 18-35 years (M = 23.81; SD = 4.49), and an exploratory factor analysis was performed. A parsimonious and interpretable 6-factor solution that displayed adequate factor loadings and adequate Omega coefficients for both instruments were found. In a second study, the two instruments and other measures of known social network usage correlates and mental health consequences were administered online to 1,418 English-speaking participants aged 18-34 years (M = 21.35; SD = 3.89). Both scales showed good psychometric properties and the factor structure identified in study 1 was reproduced through confirmatory factor analysis. Omega reliability coefficients were adequate. Finally, when performing multi-group CFA along with a French (n = 1,826) and a Spanish (n = 3,040) sample, language and gender invariance were supported. Correlations with other relevant measures indicate good convergent validity of both scales. Conclusions: The present research provides psychometrically sound instruments for further investigations on Instagram use behaviors.

Development of the Social and Emotional Competence Assessment Battery for Adults.

Literature has emphasized the urgency of investing in the promotion of Social and Emotional Competence (SEC) in adults. Therefore, the development of a theoretically grounded and developmentally adjusted measure that adequately assesses SEC in its different domains is needed. This study aimed to develop a self-report battery for the assessment of adults' SEC. Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Social and Emotional Competence Assessment Battery for Adults (SECAB-A) were assessed. Seven-hundred and ninety-six adults (80.7% female) completed the SECAB-A. A subsample of 63 elementary school teachers (92.1% female) participated at two points in time and also completed external measures assessing affect, emotion regulation, and burnout symptoms, thus making it possible to test for test-retest reliability and convergent and discriminant validities. Despite sample size variation, no statistically significant differences between groups were found for the SECAB-A scales. Extraction of factors and confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized factorial structures. Coefficient omegas suggested adequate internal consistency and scores were highly correlated between the two data collection waves, also ensuring adequate test-retest reliability. There was also evidence of the SECAB-A's convergent and discriminant validities against the external measures. Results from this study indicate that the SECAB-A is a promising measure for the adult population. Nevertheless, additional criterion-related and construct validity research is needed.

Development and Psychometric Characteristics of an Instrument to Assess Parental Feeding Practices to Promote Young Children's Eating Self-Regulation: Results with a Portuguese Sample.

A parental child-centered feeding approach is likely to keep children's biological mechanisms activated while eating, protecting them in an obesogenic context. However, few feeding practice measures assess parents' behaviors to guide and prompt children to identify and respond appropriately to their signs of hunger and satiety. We aimed to develop and study the reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of a new scale to assess parental feeding practices to promote children's self-regulation of food intake. To pursue this aim, we conducted two descriptive, cross-sectional, online studies in Portugal in an online format; a total of 536 parents of 2- to 6-year-old children completed the evaluation protocol. Factorial analysis findings support the theoretical organization proposed for the scale. The confirmatory factorial analysis supported a first-order factor structure with two subscales, Prompting for eating self-regulation and Teaching about eating consequences, with eight items in total. Both scales presented good internal consistency and adequate temporal stability, with a significant, positive, and moderate relationship. The results showed metric invariance for the child's sex. Both types of practices were positively correlated with the child's enjoyment of food. Prompting for eating self-regulation showed negative associations with parents' emotional lack of control, children's satiety responsiveness, slowness in eating, and fussiness. Preliminary studies confirmed both the validity and reliability of the instrument and the adequacy of adopting a self-regulatory approach when assessing child-centered feeding practices. Combining this instrument with others that assess coercive practices can be beneficial to capture ineffective parents' behaviors on children's eating self-regulation.

A psychometric study of the Russian-language version of the "Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-third edition": An assessment of reliability and validity.

Introduction: The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-third edition (Bayley-III) is one of the most widely used tools for assessing child development, and adapted versions of this instrument have been successfully used in many countries. No comprehensive psychometric studies of the Bayley-III have yet been performed in Russia. Materials and methods: This psychometric study was part of the longitudinal study conducted by the Ural Federal University in 2016-2020. Within the project, the original Bayley-III manual was translated into Russian and then used in a cohort of 333 infants to assess cognition, expressive/receptive communication, and fine/gross motor skills. For the purpose of psychometric analysis, we selected the data for four age groups of children from the longitudinal study database: 4-6 months (N = 149), 10 months (N = 138), 15 months (N = 151), and 24 months (N = 124). The development scores of the sample children were compared with the original Bayley-III norms in each age strata separately. Reliability and validity of the translated instrument were examined using correlation analysis, tests of internal consistency, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: The average scaled scores of the examined children were generally comparable with the original (US) Bayley-III norms, with the exception of those older than 1 year, who demonstrated 1.2-1.9 points better performance in cognitive development and gross motor skills and 0.9-2.6 points lower performance in expressive communication. The correlation of both raw and scaled scores between different scales was low to moderate in all age groups (Spearman's ρ mostly within the range of 0.3-0.6; p < 0.001 for all pairwise correlations). Internal consistency tests confirmed high reliability of the translated instrument (Cronbach's α = 0.74-0.87, McDonald's ω = 0.79-0.89). CFA demonstrated a good fit of the three-factor model (cognitive, communicative, and motor components) in all age strata. Conclusion: The Russian version of the Bayley-III proved to be a psychometrically valid and reliable tool for assessing child development, at least in a research context. The development of the examined children was close to the original US norms, with some deviation in cognitive, gross motor, and expressive communication scores mostly in older children, which could be attributed to the biased sample.

Psychometric study of the SF-36v2 in hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE).

BACKGROUND: The generic 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) has been used to assess health related quality of life in adult patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) even though it has not yet been validated for use in this specific disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to validate the SF-36v2 for use in adult patients with C1-INH-HAE. RESULTS: There was a very low item non-response rate (1-3.4%), with a high ceiling effect in 25/35 items and a low floor effect in 3/35 items. A moderate ceiling effect was observed in 5/8 dimensions of the SF-36v2, whereas no floor effect was noticed in any of the dimensions. Internal consistency was good to excellent with Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranging between 0.82 and 0.93 for the different dimensions. Construct validity was good: seven out of the 8 hypotheses defined on clinical criteria were confirmed, discriminant validity assessment showed significant differences among patients with different C1-INH-HAE severity, convergent validity showed a good correlation among the physical and mental component summaries of the SF-36v2 and the HAE-QoL total score (0.45 and 0.64 respectively, P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was high with intraclass correlation coefficient varying from 0.758 to 0.962. The minimal clinically important difference was calculated by distribution methods and small differences in the domain scores and in the component summaries scores were shown to be meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties of the SF-36v2 show it can be a useful tool to assess HRQoL in adult patients with C1-INH-HAE, although with some content validity limitation. METHODS: The psychometric properties of the SF-36v2 were evaluated in an international setting based on responses from 290 adult C1-INH-HAE patients in 11 countries.

Translational cultural adaptation and psychometric study of the Persian version of pediatric inventory for parents.

BACKGROUND: Cancer, as a life-threatening disease in children, poses several challenges for parents. It is necessary to have a tool that can comprehensively examine the stressful events for parents of children with cancer. The aim this present study was done with the aim of study the Persian version of pediatric inventory for parents (PIP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a conducted based on methodological research design. Four hundred and fifteen parents of children with cancer referring to Alia Asghar Children's Hospital and Children's Medical Centre in Tehran answered the Persian version of PIP questionnaire in 2019. a confirmatory factor analysis was carried out using LISREL (software version 8.8) to test the construct validity of PIP. The two tools of parental stress scale and state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI-Y) were used for concurrent validity purposes. RESULTS: The results showed that, the overall score of the questionnaire was higher than the average and related to emotional distress. The internal correlation coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) in both parts of the PIP was between 0.808 and 0.957 and acceptable. Concurrent validity analysis indicated positive and significant correlation of this tool in the difficulty section of the scale with both Parental Stress Scale and STAI-Y. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the factor loads of all items except three items in the frequency section were more than 0.3 and were appropriate. CONCLUSION: The Persian version of PIP can be available to health and family experts as a valid and reliable tool to assess stressful events of parents of children with cancer.

Development and validation of a scale to assess the attitude of healthcare professionals toward persons with disability.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument that measures the attitudes of healthcare professionals toward persons with disabilities. DESIGN: The Delphi survey consensus method was used to compose a preliminary questionnaire for survey. Then, healthcare professionals responded to the questionnaire online, and the results were used for psychometric analysis. SETTING: Three tertiary hospitals. SUBJECTS: A total of 993 healthcare professionals. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN MEASURES: Attitudes of healthcare professionals toward persons with disabilities. RESULTS: A 28-item preliminary questionnaire was initially developed after a two-round Delphi survey with 16 experts. Through an online survey, the final 20 items were categorized as follows: behaviors in clinical situation, knowledge and skills, emotional response, and responsibility of healthcare professionals. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the total score was 0.890 and varied between 0.856 and 0.892 in the four subdomains. The newly developed tool showed an acceptable model fit. Healthcare professionals who participated in an education module showed higher scores in behavior and knowledge/skills subdomains than those who did not, whereas participants who had clinical experience with persons with disabilities demonstrated higher scores in emotional response and knowledge/skills subdomains. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a scale to measure the attitudes toward persons with disabilities of healthcare professionals. The scale demonstrated a sensitivity to measure a difference by participation in an education module or clinical experience with persons with disabilities.

Reliability, validity and minimal detectable change of 2-min walk test and 10-m walk test in frail older adults receiving day care and residential care.

BACKGROUND: The psychometric properties of the 2-min walk test (2MWT) and 10-m walk test (10MeWT) for frail older adults are unclear. AIMS: To determine the test-retest and inter-rater reliability, construct and known-group validity, and minimal detectable change at 95% level of confidence (MDC95) of these walk tests in frail older adults receiving day care and residential care services. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with repeated measures was conducted on frail older adults who could walk independently for at least 15 m. The participants completed the 2MWT and 10MeWT on three separate occasions over a 2-week period under two independent assessors. RESULTS: Forty-four frail older adults were examined. Excellent test-rest (ICC = 0.95-0.99) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.95-0.97) were shown in both walk tests. Good to strong correlations were found between the walk tests and 6-min walk test (r = 0.89-0.92), Elderly Mobility Scale (r = 0.56-0.57), Berg Balance Scale (r = 0.66-0.66) and Modified Barthel Index (r = 0.55-0.59). The MDC95 were 7.7 m in the 2MWT and 0.13 m/s in the 10MeWT. DISCUSSION: Although the walking performances of the day care and residential care participants were similar, the validity of the walk tests was different between these two subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The 2MWT and 10MeWT are reliable and valid measures in evaluating the walking performances of frail older adults. The MDC95 of the walk tests has been recommended.

Validation of the Arabic Version of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is commonly used to measure quality of life (QOL) in patients with heart failure (HF). We examined the psychometric properties and cultural validity of an Arabic version of the MLHFQ. METHODS: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted with 210 adult HF outpatients. Patients were interviewed with the Arabic MLHFQ and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Cronbach's alpha coefficient and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted. Patients with different NYHA classes and HF-hospitalization histories were compared on QOL to test known-group validity. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analysis yielded 3 factors: physical, emotional, and social. Three items (4, 8, and 15) had low loadings. The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.92. There were significant differences in MLHFQ by PHQ-9 categories, NYHA class, and HF-hospitalization history. CONCLUSIONS: This Arabic version of MLHFQ is valid and reliable and can be used in Arabic-speaking Lebanese HF populations.

Reconsideration of the factorial structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11): Assessment of impulsivity in a large population of euthymic bipolar patients.

BACKGROUND: Impulsivity is commonly assessed using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11). Some studies challenged the reliability of its three dimensional structure and proposed a bi-dimensional structure. METHODS: The psychometric reliability of the BIS-11 scale was studied in a sample of 580 euthymic bipolar patients. An alternative structure of the scale was conceived, using confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) in the first half (N = 290) and cross-validated in the second half of our sample. Associations between the newly defined shortened scale and predefined clinical variables were computed. RESULTS: The original three dimensional structure did not fit in our sample according to statistical criteria in CFA. A 12 items Impulsivity Scale (IS-12) was designed with strong indices of fitting in the first half of our sample and replicated in the second half of our sample. The IS-12 evidences two dimensions: "behavioral impulsivity" and "cognitive impulsivity". Associations between "behavioral impulsivity" and both presence of past suicide attempts and number of suicide attempts were observed. Substance misuse was strongly associated with both subscores of the new scale. LIMITATIONS: The rating of the items assessing the two dimensions of the IS-12 is reversed. The population is restricted to euthymic bipolar patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Impulsivity Scale assesses two distinct dimensions named behavioral and cognitive impulsivity. It was reliable and valid in our sample and associated with the existence of suicidal behavior and with substance misuse (alcohol and cannabis). Further studies are needed to demonstrate its predictive validity.

[Reliability and validity of a workbook for assessment of professional competencies of internal medicine residents]. / Évaluation multicentrique de la reproductibilité et de la validité d'un carnet d'évaluation des compétences professionnelles des internes de médecine interne.

INTRODUCTION: Though several assessment tools for resident professional skills based on workplace direct observation have been validated, they remain scarcely used in France. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and the validity of a workbook including several assessment forms for different components of the professional competency. METHODS: Three assessment forms have been tested over a period of 6 months in a multicentric study including 12 French internal medicine departments: the French version of the mini-CEX, an interpersonal skills assessment form (OD_CR) and the multisource feedback form (E_360). Reliability has been assess using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Cronbach alpha coefficient. Arguments for validity have been provided looking at the ability of the forms to detect an increase in the scores over time and according to the level of experience of the resident. RESULTS: Twenty-five residents have been included. The Cronbach alpha was of 0.90 (n=70) with the mini-CEX, 0.89 with the OD_CR (n=62) and 0.77 with the E_360 (n=86). ICC showed a wide variation according to the items of the mini-CEX and the OD-CR probably due to the poor number of observations performed by residents. The scores of most of the items of these two forms increased between M1 and M6. The scores of the E_360 were high: 7.3±0.8 to 8.3±2.4 (maximum 9) and did not vary according to the level of experience. CONCLUSION: This study suggest that it would be difficult to ensure a sufficient reliability for professional skills assessment using these tools given our available current human and material resources. However, these assessment forms could be added to the resident portfolio as supports for the debriefing in order to document their progression during their formation.