Assessment of olfactory recovery after COVID-19: cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate recovery patterns of olfactory dysfunction among recovered COVID-19 patients, both subjective and objective, and correlate this recovery to the severity of the disease. METHODS: The study recruited 200 patients and assigned them to two equal groups, one of them was a control group. The olfactory function of the study group was assessed via subjective and objective methods at baseline and then monthly for three months, with changes in smell function reported at each visit. These patients underwent chemosensory testing using the Sniffin' Sticks test and completed the validated Arabic version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS). RESULTS: Olfactory dysfunction occurred on the first day of COVID-19 symptoms in 37% of participants. Subjective reports suggested smell recovery in 55% after 3 months, but Sniffin' Sticks showed only 1% with normal function, indicating persistent deficits in others. This study revealed smell recovery for 93% of participants (median 14 days), with most (58%) recovering within 2 weeks. No significant links were found between demographics, COVID-smell loss timing, and recovery speed. CONCLUSION: Three months after COVID-19, many patients perceive smell recovery, but objective tests reveal shockingly high rates of persistent dysfunction. Further follow-up with objective tests is vital to assess the true burden and potential long-term effects of smell loss.

Determination of the relationship between olfactory function threshold and quality of life among adult Filipinos with perceived olfactory dysfunction

Objective@#To determine the relationship between olfactory function threshold and quality of life (QOL) among adult Filipinos with perceived olfactory dysfunction (OD).@*Methods@#Design:Cross - Sectional Study. Setting:Tertiary Government Training Hospital. Participants: 98 adults who had self-perceived olfactory dysfunction described as “poor” or “no sense” of smell@*Results@#We analyzed data from 98 participants, with a mean age of 35.91 + 12.58 years old, composed of 46 men (47%) and 52 women (53%), with 82 normosmic, six hyposmic and ten anosmic as categorized by their BTT scores. Twenty-seven percent (27%) identified themselves as having poor QOL based on Fil 17 QODNS. Differences were exhibited between sexes’ BTT scores - [t(96) = -2.32; p = .022; females, M: 9.25; SD: 2.33 vs. males, M: 7.76; SD : 3.91], civil status - Fil17QODNS scores [t(96)= 3.05, p < .003; married M: 11.72, SD: 13.74 vs. single, M: 4.71; SD: 8.66), and the presence of ENT symptoms BTT [t(96) = -7.15; p < .0001; symptomatic, M: 5.62; SD: 4.54, vs. asymptomatic, M: 9.78; SD: 1.14] and Fil 17 QODNS scores [t(96)= 3.94; P < .00001; symptomatic, M: 14.86; SD: 13.97] vs. asymptomatic, M: 5.217; SD: 9.60]. Significant risk factors were the presence of ENT symptoms [OR= 0.15; 95% CI: 0.02-0.97; P = .046] for poor smell threshold, and comorbidities [OR= 3.36; 95% CI: 1.04-10.85; P = .043] for poor QOL. A negative correlation was observed between Fil-QOD-NS scores and BTT scores [r = -0.477, p < .001; rs = -0.292, p = .004], signifying that the presence of olfactory dysfunction has an inverse relationship with the quality of life.@*Conclusion@#Individuals with olfactory dysfunction in this study population had poor quality of life as determined by the translated Filipino 17-item QOD-NS which has an inverse relationship with their smell threshold as represented by the BTT results. Among the factors studied, significant differences were found between sexes, civil status and presence of ENT symptoms in the BTT and Fil 17 QODNS scores. However, only presence of comorbidities and ENT symptoms are significant risk factors for quality of life and smell threshold, respectively, in this population.

Predictive significance of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders-negative statements for olfactory loss in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVES: The questionnaire of olfactory disorder-negative statements (QOD-NS) is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the olfactory-specific quality of life. This study aimed to explore the association between the QOD-NS and objective olfactory metrics (including objective olfactory cleft assessment) and then evaluate the predictive significance of the QOD-NS for olfactory loss in Chinese patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: A total of 70 patients with CRS were enrolled in the study. Olfaction was assessed with Sniffin' Sticks. The olfactory cleft was assessed by the sinus CT scan and nasal endoscopy (the Lund-Mackay olfactory cleft scale, LM-OC and olfactory cleft endoscopy scale, OCES). The QOD-NS and its short version were utilized to assess the patient-reported olfaction. The predictors associated with olfactory loss were analyzed by the logistic regression analysis. The optimal cutoff points of the predictors were determined by the receiver-operating characteristic curves and the Youden index. RESULTS: The TDI score in patients with CRS significantly correlated with the QOD-NS (r = - 0.755, P < 0.001), OCES (r = - 0.520, P < 0.001), LM-OC (r = - 0.615, P < 0.001). After adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities, QOD-NS was significantly associated with olfactory dysfunction [odds ratio (OR) = 1.243; P = 0.001] and anosmia in patients with CRS (OR = 1.838; P = 0.006). Furthermore, the QOD-NS significantly correlated with the LM-OC (r = 0.610, P < 0.001), and the OCES (r = 0.464, P < 0.001) in patients with CRS. The QOD-NS had the highest predictive value for olfactory dysfunction (optimal cutoff = 10.5; Youden index = 0.635; area under the curve = 0.861) and anosmia (optimal cutoff = 20.5; Youden index = 0.790; area under the curve = 0.928) in patients with CRS. CONCLUSION: The QOD-NS showed high validity and correlated well with objective olfactory metrics and olfactory cleft assessment in patients with CRS. The QOD-NS was a reliable predictor for olfactory dysfunction and anosmia in patients with CRS, which may aid in the fast screening of olfactory loss in the clinic.

Total laryngectomy negatively impacts sinonasal and olfactory-specific quality of life.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to characterize deficits in olfactory-specific and sinonasal-specific QoL after total laryngectomy (TL) with validated patient reported outcome measures. METHODS: Thirty patients who had a TL were prospectively enrolled. Patient demographics, as well as scores from the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders Negative Statements (QOD-NS) and the Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) were collected. Univariate analysis was performed to assess associations between patient characteristics and QoL scores. RESULTS: The average QOD-NS score was 37.9 ± 11.4 (<38.5 is considered abnormal) and average SNOT-22 score was 32.0 ± 3.8 (>20 indicates a moderate/severe impact on QoL). The abnormal QOD-NS group had a greater percentage of former smokers compared to the normal group (77.8% vs. 58.1%; P = 0.56) and more median days from surgery compared to the normal group (904 vs. 477 days; P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory dysfunction associated with TL results in blunting of olfactory-specific QoL.

Quality of life among SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients with anosmia using the short version questionnaire of olfactory disorders - Negative statements translated in Filipino (sQOD-NS Ph)

@#<p><strong>Objective:</strong> To determine the quality of life among SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients with anosmia using the Short Version Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders - Negative Statements translated in Filipino (sQOD-NS Ph).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><strong>Design:</strong> Cross-Sectional Study</p><p><strong>                 Setting:</strong> Tertiary Government Training Hospital</p><p><strong>                 Participants:</strong> SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) RT-PCR positive patients aged 18 years old and above with COVID-19 symptoms and anosmia in a tertiary government hospital who consulted from March 2020 to August 2021 answered the short version of sQOD-NS Ph.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Out of 108 participants with positive SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) RT-PCR test, 72 (66%) presented with anosmia, and sQOD-NS Ph scores ranged from 1 to 21 with a mean of 14.78. Thirty two (44%) encountered problems in eating while 21 (29%) had feelings of isolation due to loss of smell. There was an inverse correlation of -0.478 between recovery time of olfaction and QoL score, hence the longer the recovery time, the lower the QoL score, while the shorter the recovery time, the higher the QoL score (p < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Majority of COVID-19 patients with anosmia had mild or negligible impairment, while a small percentage had impaired quality of life. The low percentage may be due to high number of patients who may have recovered their sense of smell along the course of the disease.</p>