Does the Anastomosis Recipient Vessel Have an Influence on Free Flap Perfusion in Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction-A Retrospective Analysis of 338 Cases with Comparison of Flap Perfusion between Different Arterial and Venous Recipient Vessels in Radial Free Forearm Flaps, Anterolateral Thigh Flaps, and Fibula Free Flaps.

Background: Flap perfusion is a prerequisite for microvascular free flap survival and a parameter routinely used for flap monitoring. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the anastomosis recipient vessel on flap perfusion. Methods: Flap perfusion was retrospectively analyzed in 338 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with microvascular free flaps between 2011 and 2020. The Oxygen-to-see tissue oxygen analysis system measurements for intraoperative and postoperative flap blood flow, hemoglobin concentration, and hemoglobin oxygen saturation at 8 and 2 mm tissue depths were compared between arterial anastomosis recipient vessels (external carotid artery [ECA], facial artery [FAA], lingual artery [LIA], and superior thyroid artery [STA]) and venous anastomosis recipient vessels (internal jugular vein [IJV], combination of IJV and IJV branches, IJV branches, and external jugular vein). Results: The postoperative hemoglobin concentration at 2 mm tissue depth differed significantly between arterial anastomosis recipient vessels (ECA, 41.0 arbitrary units [AU]; FAA, 59.0 AU; LIA, 51.5 AU; STA, 59.0 AU; p = 0.029). This difference did not persist in the multivariable testing (p = 0.342). No other differences in flap blood flow, hemoglobin concentration, or hemoglobin oxygen saturation were observed between the arterial and venous anastomosis recipient vessels (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusions: The arterial and venous recipient vessels used for anastomosis did not influence microvascular free flap perfusion. This underlines the capability of the studied recipient vessels to adequately perfuse free flaps, may explain the observed indifferent flap survival rates between commonly used anastomosis recipient vessels, and implies that the recipient vessel is not a confounding variable for flap monitoring with the Oxygen-to-see tissue oxygen analysis system. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings.

Soft Tissue Reconstruction After Revascularization.

Diabetic foot ulcer represents the primary cause of hospital admissions, amputations, and mortality in diabetic patients. The development of diabetic foot ulcers is influenced by peripheral neuropathy, infection, and ischemia, with diabetes contributing to peripheral artery disease. Free tissue transfer combined with revascularisation of the lower extremity provides the potential opportunity for limb salvage in individuals with lower extremity defects due to critical limb ischemia and diabetic foot.

A simple free flap strategy using end-to-side anastomosis to the main vessels in injured extremity.

Background: During free flap surgery, the surgeon sometimes encounters problems with anastomosis such as intractable arterial spasms or vessel size discrepancy in venous anastomoses. End-to-side (ETS) anastomosis has the advantages of limited chance of vessel spasm and easy handling by adjusting for vessel size discrepancy. We introduced the arterial and venous end-to-side anastomosis (AV-ETS) strategy, which is based on the ETS anastomosis to the main artery and accompanying veins, to avoid intraoperative anastomotic problems when creating a free flap. The aim of this study was to compare flap outcomes and intraoperative anastomotic problems before and after introduction of the AV-ETS strategy in extremity free flap surgery. Materials and methods: We retrospectively examined 72 consecutive extremity free flaps. Before introducing the AV-ETS strategy, we used the conventional strategy in which the recipient artery was selected according to the number of the remaining main artery and the anastomosis technique was flexibly changed, although the end-to-end (ETE) technique was used in most cases. Results: The conventional group had 18 flaps and the AV-ETS group had 54 flaps. The rate of flap survival did not differ between these groups, and there were no cases of flap failure after the introduction of the AV-ETS strategy. The AV-ETS group had significantly fewer flaps that required a change in preoperative planning for the recipient artery or anastomotic site of the artery. Conclusions: The AV-ETS strategy may facilitate reliable preoperative planning and the performance of stable free flap surgery without requiring a flexible response during surgery.

Mechanical Dilation of the Recipient Vessel with the DeBakey Vascular Dilator in Lower Extremity Reconstruction: A Report of Two Cases.

In lower extremity reconstruction, the recipient vessel often requires long-range mechanical dilation because of extensive vasospasm or plaque formation induced by concomitant atherosclerosis. While a forceps dilator can be used to manipulate and dilate vessels approximately 1 cm from their end, a DeBakey vascular dilator can dilate long-range vessels. The authors successfully performed free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity using the DeBakey vascular dilator. Of the two patients who underwent lower extremity reconstruction, one had extensive vasospasm, and the other had plaques in the recipient arteries. Irrigation with 4% lidocaine and dilation of the lumen with a forceps dilator were insufficient to restore the normal arterial blood flow. Instead, a DeBakey vascular dilator with a 1-mm diameter tip was gently inserted into the lumen. Then, to overcome vessel resistance, the dilator gently advanced approximately 10 cm to dilate the recipient artery. Normal arterial blood flow was gushed out after dilating the vessel lumen using a DeBakey vascular dilator. The vascular anastomosis was performed, and intravenous heparin 5000 IU was administered immediately after anastomosis. Prophylactic low-molecular-weight-heparin (Clexane, 1 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously to both patients for 14 days. The reconstructed flap survived without necrosis in either patient.

Sural Artery as a Recipient Vessel for Free Flaps.

Introduction The axial vessels like the anterior and posterior tibial emerge as the first choice of recipient vessels, in free flaps for lower limb trauma. When the defects are located more proximally in the leg, the deeper course of the axial vessels makes the dissection more tedious. Alternative vessels like the descending genicular, medial genicular, and distal end of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral can be used for an end-to-end anastomosis, well away from the zone of trauma. The objective of this study was to define the indications and technique of the use of the sural vessels as the recipient pedicle for proximal and middle third leg defects. Patients and Methods For the period 2006 to 2022, 18 leg defects following road traffic accidents were covered with latissimus dorsi muscle flap using sural vessels as the recipient pedicle. Results Among 18 patients, 8 patients had defect in proximal third, 8 had a combined defect in proximal and middle third leg, and 2 had defect in middle third leg. Two patients developed arterial thrombosis and one patient had venous thrombosis for which re-exploration was performed. Two flaps were lost and sixteen had successful wound coverage. Conclusion The sural vessels as recipient pedicle are easier to access and can be considered as a reliable option for free flaps in limb defects of proximal and middle third leg. Using the submuscular part of the vessel ensures a better distal reach of the flap.

Lower Leg Reconstruction With Free Tissue Transfer Using Reverse Flow Recipient Vein: A Case Report.

Since the introduction of distally based flap, the concept of reverse flow flap was expanded to free tissue transfers. For recipient vessels, retrograde arterial inflow is considered a safe option for anastomosis. However, the reliability of a retrograde recipient vein remains controversial. This report presents a case of successful lower leg reconstruction with free flap using a retrograde recipient vein. A 43-year-old woman had a mass lesion in the lateral side of the right calf, which was diagnosed as a malignant granular cell tumor. During wide excision of the tumor, the anterior tibial artery (ATA) and veins were ligated and resected at the bifurcation point from the popliteal artery and veins because the tumor abutted on the ATA near the bifurcation. The skin defect measured 17 × 7 cm with the proximal part of the tibia and lateral condyle exposed. A 19 × 7.5 cm anterolateral thigh flap was elevated, and anastomoses were performed using the distal end of the ATA and anterior tibial vein as retrograde recipient vessels. The flap was well perfused, and no signs of venous insufficiency were observed. Complete survival with no postoperative complications was achieved. In free tissue transfers of the lower leg, retrograde venous flow can be considered as a recipient vein when an antegrade vein is not available or has risks of venous insufficiency.

Usefulness of perforating branches of the deep femoral artery and vein as recipient vessels during free-flap reconstruction for extensive defects of the thigh.

The perforating branches of the deep femoral artery and vein are considered useful recipient vessels during free-flap reconstruction for extensive defects extending from the knee to the mid-thigh or from the lateral to the posterior region of the thigh. Despite being located deep between the adductor longus and magnus muscles, they can be easily identified, allowing for a sufficient surgical field for the vascular anastomosis. Approximately four perforators from the deep femoral artery can be found on the posterior aspect of the thigh, easily identified by dissecting the semitendinosus and biceps femoris muscles. The calibre and length of the perforators were suitable for vascular anastomosis. In this study, we present three cases of free-flap reconstruction for extensive thigh defects using perforating branches of the deep femoral artery and vein as recipient vessels.

Optimization of Vascular Supply in Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction: Analysis of a Young Team's Experience.

Background: For head and neck reconstructive procedures, free flap survival depends on microsurgical and anatomical choices besides multimodal clinical management. The aim of the present study is to identify relevant variables for flap survival in our initial consecutive series. Methods: A single-center, novel reconstructive team consecutive surgical series was revised. The outcome was analyzed in terms of flap survival observing variables considered more relevant: flap type, recipient artery, vein(s), and graft interposition were discussed for facial thirds to be reconstructed. Statistical analysis was performed with Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Odds ratio. Results: A total of 118 free flaps were performed in 115 microsurgical procedures (93.9% for malignancies) on 109 patients, with a flap survival rate of 91.5%. For reconstruction of the middle and lower third of the face, the facial artery was privileged, because it was already transected during lymph node dissection in order to save the superior thyroid artery for further microsurgical needs. Flap failure was 50% venous. Double vein anastomosis was not related to flap survival. Deep venous drainage (as the internal jugular vein system) required fewer revisions. Half of the re-explorations saved the flap. Grafts were a risk for flap survival. Bony flaps were more critical. Conclusion: At comparable reconstructive quality, flap choice should avoid a vascular graft. The facial artery is a preferable recipient vessel, since it saves other arteries both in the case of an arterial revision and in the case of recurrence, for further free flap reconstruction. For venous anastomosis, a deep venous recipient is safer, since it offers the possibility to choose the level of anastomosis optimizing the vascular pedicle geometry. A close postsurgical flap monitoring is advisable up to 7 days postoperatively to allow for timely flap salvage.

Use of Muscle Feeding Arteries as Recipient Vessels for Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Lower Extremities.

Microsurgical free tissue transfer is still playing an important role in lower extremity reconstruction. Finding a suitable recipient artery for anastomosis is critical in the microsurgical procedure, especially in an extensive wound, or in a complex trauma combined with vascular injury. From April 2014 to March 2018, we retrospectively reviewed patients with traumatic/post-traumatic, oncologic, and electrical wounds in the lower extremity. Those treated with muscle feeding artery as recipient vessels were included. The latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle free flap, anterior lateral thigh (ALT) perforator free flap, and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap were raised. The muscle feeding arteries to vastus lateral muscle and to medial head of gastrocnemius muscle, concomitant veins, and great saphenous vein were used as recipient vessels. Injuries included in the study were caused by tumour in 2 cases, car accident in 3 cases, crushing in 3 cases, burns in one case, and electrical injury in one case. The wound size varied from 14 cm × 6 cm to 30 cm × 20 cm. LD, ALT, and DIEP free flaps were used in 6, 3, and 4 patients, respectively. The muscle feeding arteries to medial head of gastrocnemius muscle, to sartorius muscle, and to vastus lateral muscle were used as recipient arteries in 4, 5, and one patient, respectively. Concomitant and great saphenous veins were used as recipient veins in 10 and 4 patients, respectively. Using the muscle feeding artery is feasible to avoid injury to the main artery and facilitate dissection and anastomoses, particularly when the wound is located proximal to the mid-third of the lower leg.

Indocyanine green videoangiography for recipient vessel stratification in superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: In superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass surgery, recipient vessel properties are likely one of the main reasons for bypass failure. In daily practice, most surgeons select the recipient with the largest diameter. However, selection of the ideal recipient remains debatable because there are no objective selection criteria if multiple potential recipients exist. Here, the authors assessed the benefit of using indocyanine green videoangiography (ICG-VA) to optimize recipient vessel selection in patients undergoing STA-MCA bypass surgery for hemodynamic compromise. METHODS: All patients who had undergone STA-MCA bypass procedures with pre- and postanastomosis ICG-VA between 2010 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion in this study. The primary bypass surgeon was blinded to the preanastomosis ICG-VA. Preanastomosis white-light and ICG-VA images were compared to determine the identifiability of potential recipient vessels and pathological flow patterns. After completion of the anastomosis, a second (postanastomosis) ICG-VA image was used to analyze the flow increase within the chosen recipient based on the vessel diameter, initial recipient blood flow, initial sequence of appearance on ICG-VA, initial blood flow direction within the recipient, and orientation of the bypass graft. ICG-VA, FLOW 800, and intraoperative white-light images, as well as demographic, clinical, and radiographic patient data, were retrospectively analyzed by a clinician who was not directly involved in the patients' care. RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent 65 STA-MCA bypass procedures with pre- and postanastomosis ICG-VA. The ICG-VA permitted identification of a significantly higher number of potential recipient vessels (median 4, range 1-9) than the white-light images (median 2, range 1-5; p < 0.001), with detection of pathological flow patterns in 20% of all procedures. No association was found between the diameter and blood flow within potential recipients (Spearman r = 0.07, p = 0.69). After bypass grafting, the highest flow increase was noted in recipients with an initially low flow (p < 0.01), a late appearance (p < 0.01), and an initially retrograde flow direction (p = 0.02). Interestingly, flow increase was not significantly influenced by the recipient diameter (p = 0.09) or graft orientation (p = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: ICG-VA facilitates identification of potential recipient vessels and detection of pathological flow patterns. Recipients with an initially low flow, a late appearance, and a retrograde flow seem to bear the highest potential for flow increase, possibly due to a higher hemodynamic need for revascularization.

Reliable free flaps using the microscopic parachute end-to-side technique in severe extremity injuries.

PURPOSE: Although end-to-side anastomosis is an essential method for the transfer of free flaps in traumatic extremity injuries, orthoplastic surgeons have no standard technique for performing this procedure. We describe a simple and reliable end-to-side technique is modified from that commonly used by cardiovascular surgeons for free-flap transfer. METHODS: Our microscopic parachute end-to-side technique consists primarily of two simple steps. First, the donor vessel is cut and widened with microscissors, and a wide slit is made in the recipient vessel. Second, the heel of the vessel is sutured using the parachute technique, followed by suturing of the vessel wall with a continuous suture to control blood leakage from the widely opened window. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of 18 flaps in which the microscopic parachute end-to-side technique was used for both arterial and venous anastomoses. RESULTS: All microscopic parachute end-to-side procedures achieved flap survival without complications related to anastomosis. The mean size of the vesselotomy was 4.8 mm, and the mean expansion rate of the donor vessel was 2.7 times. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the conventional end-to-side technique, the microscopic parachute end-to-side technique has three advantages: easy vesselotomy, avoidance of anastomotic narrowing, and easy control of blood leakage from the anastomotic site. We believe that the microscopic parachute end-to-side technique might make free flaps easier and improve their clinical outcomes in severe extremity injuries.

Clinical outcomes and recipient vessel selection for free flap transfer following arteriovenous malformation resection.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is a rare vascular lesion that is difficult to treat. Radical surgical resection followed by free flap transfer is currently one of the preferred treatments, and this study aimed to assess the selection of recipient vessels and clinical outcomes for free flap transfer after AVM resection to establish better surgical management. METHODS: Data from 22 consecutive patients who underwent free flap transfer after AVM resection were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, AVMs were located at the head and neck of 11 patients and at the extremities of another 11 patients. The first choice for a recipient vessel was a normal artery or vein. However, in the absence of suitable alternatives, the feeding arteries or drainage veins were employed as recipient vessels. Patient backgrounds and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Two patients required double flap transfer to cover the defects. Hence, a total of 24 flaps were transferred. A normal artery could be used in all cases of head and neck lesions, whereas a feeding artery was used in all cases of extremity lesions. On the other hand, a normal vein could be used in all cases as the recipient vein. No anastomotic failure or flap loss occurred postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Free flap transfer is feasible and safe even after AVM resection. The feeding artery can be used as the recipient artery in the absence of a normal artery especially for AVMs in the extremity although the safety of the drainage vein as the recipient vein remains unclear. ABBREVIATIONS: AVM: arteriovenous malformation; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; 3DCT: threedimensional computed tomography; HN: head and neck; NR: not reported.

Reconstructive ladder of the leg without sufficient recipient vessels / 中华显微外科杂志

Objective To establish the reconstructive ladder for the leg without sufficient recipient vessels by case analysis and literature review.Methods From January,2009 to January,2015,772 cases were treated in our center using free flap for leg coverage and 129 cases were found intra-operatively to have insufficient recipient vessels.There were 113 males and 16 females,and the age ranged from 4 to 71 years,averaging 36.5 years.The wounds were post-traumatic (n=108) and non post-traumatic (n=21).The management methods included elongating incision (n=25),vessel transfer(n=22),Flow-through anastomosis(n=17),end-to-side anastomosis (n=13),useing neighboring vessels (n=1S),anastomosis distal to the injured zone (n=14),cross-leg free flap (n=7),and abandoning free flap transfer(n=13).Results Except for the cases of abandoning surgery (n=13,10.1％),there were 86 cases whose flap healed totally (66.7％),9 cases total lost(7.0％),and 11 cases marginal loss (8.5％).It established a reconstructive ladder for this special situation according to the principle of difficulty level.Conclusion The insufficient recipient vessels of the leg were had multi-causes which should be taken account generally before surgery.The optimal protocol for each case should be chosen from the reconstructive ladder based on the technical difficulty level.

Preoperative Angiographic Criteria for Predicting Free-Flap Transfer Outcomes in Patients With Lower-Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Patients scheduled for microsurgical reconstruction of the lower leg often receive preoperative assessment of recipient vessels using angiography. However, no clear standard is available for evaluating angiographic results to predict free-flap survival outcomes. We developed angiographic criteria for predicting surgical outcome in patients with lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease based on abnormality of the anterior tibial and posterior tibial arteries. We applied the criteria to a small number of patients scheduled for microsurgical reconstruction of the lower leg. Angiographies with arterial abnormalities were classified into 3 groups: favorable free-flap survival, compromised free-flap survival, and postsurgical pedal ischemia. The study enrolled 50 patients between 2005 and 2013. In 42% of patients, arterial abnormalities were observed by angiography. Age >65 years was the strongest risk factor for development of lower-leg arterial abnormality ( P < .001). The anterior tibial and peroneal arteries were significantly more stenotic than other vessels. In the favorable free-flap survival and compromised free-flap survival groups, free-flap transfers were attempted in 7 patients but intraoperatively abandoned in 2 patients, with postoperative failure in 1 patient. In the postsurgical pedal ischemia group, free-flap transfers were attempted in 10 patients but intraoperatively abandoned in 6 patients, with postoperative failure in 3.

Recipient Vessel Selection in Head and Neck Reconstruction Based on the Type of Neck Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Recipient vessel selection in head and neck reconstruction using free flap transfers has to be standardized. However, the recipient vessel selection based on the type of neck dissection has yet to be investigated. We describe the relationship between the type of neck dissection and recipient vessel. METHODS: Records of 107 consecutive patients who had undergone head and neck reconstruction using free flap transfers from 2011 to 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Ninety-five were men and 12 were women, with a mean age of 65.6 years. Patients were divided into 5 groups based on the type of neck dissection: no neck dissection (NND, n = 17), upper jugular neck dissection, (UJND, n = 1), supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOND, n = 18), jugular neck dissection (JND, n = 39), and modified radical neck dissection (mRND, n = 32). We details the number of recipient vessels we selected for free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction depending on the type of neck dissection. RESULTS: The overall patency rate was 100%. The superficial temporal artery was used most frequently in NND; the superior thyroid artery in SOND; the transverse cervical artery in JND; and the transverse cervical artery in mRND. The superficial temporal vein was used most frequently in NND; The internal jugular vein in the SOND; and The external jugular vein in mRND. CONCLUSION: Microsurgeons should remember that proper recipient vessel selection depending on the type of neck dissection is important. We believe proper recipient vessel selection should improve results of head and neck reconstruction using free flap transfer.

Free-flap cover of complex defects around the knee using the descending genicular artery as the recipient pedicle.

BACKGROUND: Selection of ideal recipient vessels is one of the most important factors determining success in free-flap reconstruction of the lower limb. At the knee, the choice of vessels has traditionally been either the common femoral or the popliteal vessels and their branches but these are often difficult to use or cannot be used. METHODS: A series of 32 free flaps for cover of complex injuries of the knee involving the distal femur, the knee joint and the upper tibia were reconstructed using the descending genicular branch of the femoral artery in the adductor canal and its muscular branches to the vastus medialis as the recipient vessels. RESULT: All but one flap survived with no major complications. CONCLUSION: The use of the descending genicular artery as the recipient vessel for reconstruction with free flaps around the knee has various advantages including: (i) it is mostly remote from the zone of trauma, (ii) it is constant in location, (iii) the recipient vessels are an excellent size match for end-to-end anastomosis, (iv) there is no need for changes of position of the patient when using most free flaps commonly used for knee reconstruction, (v) it is easy to harvest these simultaneously, (vi) secondary exposure of the underlying skeleton from all quadrants is unlikely to divide the flap pedicle as it is superior and (vii), perhaps most important of all, it obviates the need for exploration of the popliteal fossa.

Anatomic variations in head and neck reconstruction.

Head and neck reconstruction is a technically challenging procedure. Variations encountered in the recipient vessels and commonly used flaps add to the complexity of surgery. This article reviews the commonly encountered variations in the recipient vessels in the neck with emphasis on alternatives and techniques to circumvent these variations. Flaps commonly used in head and neck reconstruction are also reviewed in detail. Furthermore, safety, potential pitfalls, and technical pearls are highlighted.