Outcome of tailored therapy in rheumatic heart disease with persistent atrial fibrillation (RHD-AF).

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatic heart disease with persistent atrial fibrillation (RHD-AF) is associated with increased morbidity. However, there is no standardized approach for the maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) in them. We aimed to determine the utility of a stepwise approach to achieve SR in RHD-AF. METHODS: Consecutive patients with RHD-AF from July 2021 to August 2023 formed the study cohort. The stepwise approach included pharmacological rhythm control and/or electrical cardioversion (Central illustration). In patients with recurrence, additional options included AF ablation or pace and ablate strategy with conduction system pacing or biventricular pacing. Clinical improvement, NT-proBNP, 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and thromboembolic complications were documented during follow-up. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with RHD-AF (mean age 56.13 ± 9.51 years, women 72.28%) were included. Utilizing this approach, 43 (51.81%) achieved and maintained SR during the study period of 11.04 ± 7.14 months. These patients had improved functional class, lower NT-proBNP, better distance covered for 6MWT, and reduced HF hospitalizations. The duration of AF was shorter in patients who achieved SR, compared to those who remained in AF (3.15 ± 1.29 vs 6.93 ± 5.23, p = 0.041). Thirty-five percent (29) maintained SR after a single cardioversion over the study period. Only one underwent AF ablation. Of the 24 who underwent pace and ablate strategy, atrial lead was implanted in 22 (hybrid approach), and 50% of these achieved and maintained SR. Among these 24, none had HF hospitalizations, but patients who maintained SR had further improvement in clinical and functional parameters. CONCLUSIONS: RHD-AF patients who could achieve SR with a stepwise approach, had better clinical outcomes and lower HF hospitalizations.

Atrial fibrillation burden: a new outcome predictor and therapeutic target.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, is not a dichotomous disease trait. Technological innovations enable long-term rhythm monitoring in many patients and can estimate AF burden. These technologies are already used to detect and monitor AF. This review describes the relation between AF burden and outcomes and potential effects of AF burden reduction. A lower AF burden is associated with a lower risk of stroke and heart failure in patients with AF: stroke risk without anticoagulation is lower in patients with device-detected AF and a low AF burden (stroke rate 1%/year) than in patients with persistent and permanent AF (stroke rate 3%/year). Paroxysmal AF shows intermediate stroke rates (2%/year). Atrial fibrillation burden-reducing interventions can reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with AF: early rhythm control reduces cardiovascular events including stroke and heart failure in patients with recently diagnosed AF and cardiovascular conditions. In patients with heart failure and AF, early rhythm control and AF ablation, interventions that reduce AF burden, reduce mortality and heart failure events. Recent technological innovations allow to estimate AF burden in clinical care, creating opportunities and challenges. While evidence remains limited, the existing data already suggest that AF burden reduction could be a therapeutic goal. In addition to anticoagulation and treatment of cardiovascular conditions, AF burden reduction emerges as a therapeutic goal. Future research will define the AF burden that constitutes a relevant risk of stroke and heart failure. Technologies quantifying AF burden need careful validation to advance the field.

Prevalence and outcomes of heart failure phenotypes in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with heart failure (HF). Real-world data about long-term outcomes and rhythm control interventions use in AF patients with and without HF remain scarce. METHODS: AF patients from two prospective, multicentre studies were classified based on the HF status at baseline into: HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF), and no HF. The prespecified primary outcome was risk of HF hospitalisation. Other outcomes of interest included mortality, cardiovascular events, AF progression, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 1265 patients with AF were analysed (mean age 69.6 years, women 27.4%) with a median follow-up of 5.98 years. Patients with HFpEF (n = 126) had a 2.69-fold and patients with HFrEF/HFmrEF (n = 308) had a 2.12-fold increased risk of HF hospitalisation compared to patients without HF (n = 831, p < 0.001). Similar results applied for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The risk for AF progression was higher for patients with HFpEF and HFrEF/HFmrEF (6.30 and 6.79 per 100 patient-years, respectively) compared to patients without HF (4.20). The use of rhythm control strategies during follow-up was least in the HFpEF population (4.56 per 100 patient-years) compared to 7.74 in HFrEF/HFmrEF and 8.03 in patients with no HF. With regards to quality of life over time, this was worst among HFpEF patients. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of HFpEF among patients with AF carried a high risk of HF hospitalisations and AF progression, and worse quality of life. Rhythm control interventions were rarely offered to HFpEF patients. These results uncover an unmet need for enhanced therapeutic interventions in patients with AF and HFpEF.

Real-world evidence of early rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The favorable benefits of early rhythm control (ERC) therapy in newly diagnosed patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have been demonstrated in the EAST-AFNET 4 trial. However, the generalizability and applicability of ERC in real-world clinical settings remain inconclusive. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed and Embase databases to identify observational studies published between January 2020 and February 2024 that focused on real-world evidence pertaining to ERC. The effectiveness and safety outcomes in our study were analogous to those evaluated in the EAST-AFNET 4 trial. RESULTS: A total of 4 observational studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria of EAST-AFNET 4 were included, involving 130,970 patients with AF, 30.7% of whom received ERC therapy. In our pooled analysis using the fixed-effects model, compared with rate control, ERC significantly decreased the occurrence risk of the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval[CI] 0.82-0.91), cardiovascular death (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.98), stroke (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.87), and hospitalization with worsening heart failure (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99) or acute coronary syndrome (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.87). In terms of safety outcomes, there were no differences in the composite safety outcome (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.95-1.05) and all-cause death (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.06) between the two studied groups. CONCLUSIONS: ERC therapy showed favorable effectiveness outcomes compared with rate control, whereas the safety outcomes between the two therapeutic strategies did not differ significantly, supporting the benefits of ERC therapy over rate control in selected real-world patients with AF. REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42023443569).

[Atrial fibrillation and heart failure]. / Vorhofflimmern und Herzinsuffizienz.

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure are among the most common cardiovascular diseases and have a significant impact on the mortality and morbidity of affected patients. From a pathophysiological perspective, the two diseases are closely related and often perpetuate each other. Therefore, effective management of atrial fibrillation is now a central component of modern heart failure treatment. Based on current data, sinus rhythm should primarily be permanently maintained in patients with systolic heart failure. Catheter ablation has recently proven to be advantageous over purely pharmacological therapy and is therefore the treatment of choice for many patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. In patients with diastolic heart failure (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF]), the effect of catheter ablation is less clear. Data from randomized studies are urgently needed in order to further assess efficacy in this population.

Revitalizing brain perfusion: Unveiling advancements through rhythm control strategies in atrial fibrillation-A systematic review.

Background: Recent evidence suggests an elevated risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF), irrespective of stroke occurrence. AF, known to reduce brain perfusion, particularly through silent cerebral ischemia, underscores the intricate relationship between cardiac and cerebral health. The heart plays a crucial role in supporting normal brain function, and rhythm control, a standard AF treatment, has demonstrated enhancements in brain perfusion. This systematic review aimed to examine published data concerning the influence of rhythm control on brain perfusion in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: A systematic search for relevant studies was carried out in Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Reviews, ProQuest, and EBSCOhost, spanning from their inception until April 30, 2023. Studies that specifically examined brain perfusion following any form of rhythm control in atrial fibrillation were included in the review. Results: The review encompassed 10 studies involving 436 participants. Among these, six utilized electrical cardioversion for rhythm control. The majority (8 out of 10) demonstrated that restoring sinus rhythm markedly enhances brain perfusion. In one of the two remaining studies, notable improvement was observed specifically in a region closely linked to cognition. Additionally, both studies reporting data on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) showed a consistent and significant increase in scores following rhythm control. Conclusion: Successful rhythm control in AF emerges as a significant contributor to enhanced brain perfusion, suggesting a potential therapeutic avenue for reducing cognitive impairment incidence. However, further validation through larger prospective studies and randomized trials is warranted.

Design and deployment of the STEEER-AF trial to evaluate and improve guideline adherence: A cluster-randomised trial by the European Society of Cardiology and European Heart Rhythm Association.

AIMS: To describe the rationale, design, delivery and baseline characteristics of STEEER-AF (Stroke prevention and rhythm control Treatment: Evaluation of an Educational programme of the European Society of Cardiology [ESC] in a cluster-Randomised trial in patients with Atrial Fibrillation). METHODS & RESULTS: STEEER-AF is a pragmatic trial designed to objectively and robustly determine whether guidelines are adhered to in routine practice, and evaluate a targeted educational programme for healthcare professionals. Seventy centres were randomised in 6 countries (France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and United Kingdom; 2022-2023). STEEER-AF centres recruited 1732 patients with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), with mean age 68.9 years (SD 11.7), CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.2 (SD 1.8) and 647 (37%) women. 843 patients (49%) were in AF and 760 (44%) in sinus rhythm at enrolment. Oral anticoagulant therapy was prescribed in 1,543 patients (89%), with the majority receiving direct oral anticoagulants (1,378; 89%). Previous cardioversion, antiarrhythmic drug therapy or ablation was recorded in 836 patients (48.3%). 551 patients (31.8%) were currently receiving an antiarrhythmic drug, and 446 (25.8%) were scheduled to receive a future cardioversion or ablation. The educational programme engaged 195 healthcare professionals across centres randomised to the intervention group, consisting of bespoke interactive online learning and reinforcement activities, supported by national expert trainers. CONCLUSION: The STEEER-AF trial was successfully deployed across six European countries to investigate guideline adherence in real-world practice, and evaluate if a structured educational programme for healthcare professionals can improve patient-level care. REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04396418.

Efficacy of cryoablation in atrial fibrillation: comparison with antiarrhythmic therapy.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice, characterized by irregular atrial electrical activity originating mainly in and around the pulmonary veins. This condition can manifest itself symptomatically or silently but still dangerously. Complications associated with AF include stroke, heart failure, worst clinical outcome in patients with underlying conditions, increased emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and cardiovascular mortality. Currently, according to the main international guidelines, antiarrhythmic therapy is considered the first choice for rhythm control in patients with AF despite modest efficacy and non-negligible side effects. In recent decades, radiofrequency catheter ablation has emerged as an alternative to antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm control. Cryoablation was developed with the aim of reducing procedural times and reducing complications related to the ablative procedure with radiofrequency without losing efficacy. Recent studies conducted with rigour and scientific solidity have demonstrated on the one hand that the results of this technique are not inferior compare with radiofrequency. This study aims to compare data on the safety and efficacy of cryoablation with those obtained from antiarrhythmic drugs through a review of the most recent scientific evidence.

Treatment Outcomes of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) management has witnessed a paradigm shift, with an increasing emphasis on rhythm control strategies. This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess and compare the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation versus medical therapy in the treatment of AF. A systematic search was conducted across major electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to the present. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing catheter ablation with medical therapy for AF were included. The primary outcomes included rhythm control success, recurrence rates, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes encompassed quality of life, hospitalization rates, and mortality. A total of six studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 2,859 participants. Catheter ablation significantly improved rhythm control success compared to medical therapy. Subgroup analyses demonstrated variations in outcomes based on patient characteristics, procedural techniques, and follow-up durations. Recurrence rates favored ablation; however, ablation was associated with a higher incidence of minor complications and major adverse events. Catheter ablation demonstrates superior efficacy in achieving and maintaining rhythm control compared to medical therapy in the management of AF. Despite the increased risk of procedural complications, the overall safety profile remains acceptable. This systematic review provides valuable insights for clinicians and informs shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers when choosing between catheter ablation and medical therapy for AF treatment.

Real-World Outcomes of a Rhythm Control Strategy for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (<50%).

Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of a rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 50%) in real-world practice remains uncertain. Our objective was to evaluate the real-world outcomes of a rhythm control strategy in patients with AF and reduced LVEF, focusing on changes in LV systolic function and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 80 patients with concurrent AF and reduced LVEF who underwent rhythm control therapy between March 2015 and December 2021. Results: The patients had an average age of 63.6 years and an initial LVEF of 34.3%. Sinus rhythm was restored using anti-arrhythmic drugs (38, 47.5%) or electrical cardioversion (42, 52.5%). Over a follow-up period of 53.0 months, AF recurred in 65% of patients, with 57.7% undergoing catheter ablation. Significant improvements were noted in LVEF (from 34.3% to 55.1%, p < 0.001) and BNP levels (from 752 pg/mL to 72 pg/mL, p < 0.001) at the last follow-up. Nearly all patients (97.5%) continued with the rhythm control strategy during the follow-up period. Conclusions: In real-world settings, a rhythm control strategy proves to be feasible and effective for improving LVEF and reducing BNP levels in AF patients with reduced LVEF.

Atrial fibrillation inpatient management patterns and clinical outcomes during the conflict in Syria: An observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia worldwide. However, there is no data on AF inpatient management strategies and clinical outcomes in Syria. OBJECTIVES: The study aims were to review the inpatient management of patients with AF and assess cardiovascular (CV) mortality in a tertiary cardiology centre in Latakia, Syria. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at Tishreen's University Hospital, Latakia, Syria, from June 2021 to June 2023. Patients ≥16 years of age presenting and being treated for AF as the primary diagnosis with or without a thromboembolic event were included. Medical records were examined for patients' demographics, laboratory results, treatment plans and inpatient details. Studied outcomes include inpatient all-cause and CV mortality, ischemic and bleeding events, and conversion to sinus rhythm (SR). RESULTS: The study included 596 patients. The median age was 58, and 61% were males. 121 patients (20.3%) were known to have AF. A rhythm control strategy was pursued in 39% of patients. Ischemic and bleeding events occurred in 62 (11%) and 12 (2%), respectively. CV and all-cause mortality occurred in 28 (4.7%) and 31 patients (5%), respectively. The presence of valvular heart disease (VHD) (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 9.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7 to 55.1, p < .001), thyroid disease (aOR: 9.7, 95% CI = 1.2 to 91.6, p < .001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (aOR: 82, 95% CI: 12.7 to 71, p < .001) were independent risk factors of increased CV inpatient mortality. CONCLUSION: Syrian inpatients admitted with AF in Latakia are relatively younger than those in other countries. Active thyroid disease, COPD and VHD were independent risk factors of inpatient CV mortality with AF.

Cardiocerebrovascular benefits of early rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation detected after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of early rhythm control (ERC) on the occurrence of cardiocerebrovascular events in patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation detected after stroke (AFDAS). Methods: A systematic search was conducted across nine databases from inception to October 15, 2023 to identify clinical trials comparing ERC with usual care interventions in AFDAS patients. The primary outcome assessed was recurrent stroke, with secondary outcomes including all-cause mortality, adverse events related to arrhythmias, and dementia. Results: Analysis of five studies, consisting of two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving 490 patients and three cohort studies involving 95,019 patients, revealed a reduced rate of recurrent stroke [odds ratio (OR) = 0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.80, P = 0.016 in RCTs; OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.61-0.68, P < 0.00001 in cohort studies] and all-cause mortality (hazards ratio = 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98, P = 0.005 in cohort studies) in the ERC group compared to the usual care group. In addition, ERC was associated with superior outcomes in terms of dementia. Conclusions: Patients with AFDAS who underwent ERC treatment exhibited a decreased risk of cardiocerebrovascular events compared to those receiving usual care. These results support the potential benefits of implementing an ERC strategy for this specific patient population. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, Identifier [CRD42023465994].

Cognitive impairment and treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation in older adults: The SAGE-AF study.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is strongly associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). Rate and rhythm control are the two treatment strategies for AF and the effect of treatment strategy on risk of cognitive decline and frailty is not well established. We sought to determine how treatment strategy affects geriatric-centered outcomes. METHODS: The Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements-AF (SAGE-AF) was a prospective, observational, cohort study. Older adults with AF were prospectively enrolled between 2016 and 2018 and followed longitudinally for 2 years. In a non-randomized fashion, participants were grouped by rate or rhythm control treatment strategy based on clinical treatment at enrollment. Baseline characteristics were compared. Longitudinal binary mixed models were used to compare treatment strategy with respect to change in cognitive function and frailty status. Cognitive function and frailty status were assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Battery and Fried frailty phenotype tools. RESULTS: 972 participants (mean age = 75, SD = 6.8; 49% female, 87% non-Hispanic white) completed baseline examination and 2-year follow-up. 408 (42%) were treated with rate control and 564 (58%) with rhythm control. The patient characteristics of the two groups were different at baseline. Participants in the rate control group were older, more likely to have persistent AF, prior stroke, be treated with warfarin and have baseline cognitive impairment. After adjusting for baseline differences, participants treated with rate control were 1.5 times more likely to be cognitively impaired over 2 years (adjusted OR: 1.47, 95% CI:1.12, 1.98) and had a greater decline in cognitive function (adjusted estimate: -0.59 (0.23), p < 0.01) in comparison to rhythm control. Frailty did not vary between the treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Among those who had 2-year follow-up in non-randomized observational cohort, the decision to rate control AF in older adults was associated with increased odds of decline in cognitive function but not frailty.

Safety and efficacy of long-term sodium channel blocker therapy for early rhythm control: the EAST-AFNET 4 trial.

AIMS: Clinical concerns exist about the potential proarrhythmic effects of the sodium channel blockers (SCBs) flecainide and propafenone in patients with cardiovascular disease. Sodium channel blockers were used to deliver early rhythm control (ERC) therapy in EAST-AFNET 4. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed the primary safety outcome (death, stroke, or serious adverse events related to rhythm control therapy) and primary efficacy outcome (cardiovascular death, stroke, and hospitalization for worsening of heart failure (HF) or acute coronary syndrome) during SCB intake for patients with ERC (n = 1395) in EAST-AFNET 4. The protocol discouraged flecainide and propafenone in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and suggested stopping therapy upon QRS prolongation >25% on therapy. Flecainide or propafenone was given to 689 patients [age 69 (8) years; CHA2DS2-VASc 3.2 (1); 177 with HF; 41 with prior myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, or percutaneous coronary intervention; 26 with left ventricular hypertrophy >15 mm; median therapy duration 1153 [237, 1828] days]. The primary efficacy outcome occurred less often in patients treated with SCB [3/100 (99/3316) patient-years] than in patients who never received SCB [SCBnever 4.9/100 (150/3083) patient-years, P < 0.001]. There were numerically fewer primary safety outcomes in patients receiving SCB [2.9/100 (96/3359) patient-years] than in SCBnever patients [4.2/100 (135/3220) patient-years, adjusted P = 0.015]. Sinus rhythm at 2 years was similar between groups [SCB 537/610 (88); SCBnever 472/579 (82)]. CONCLUSION: Long-term therapy with flecainide or propafenone appeared to be safe in the EAST-AFNET 4 trial to deliver effective ERC therapy, including in selected patients with stable cardiovascular disease such as coronary artery disease and stable HF. Clinical Trial Registration ISRCTN04708680, NCT01288352, EudraCT2010-021258-20, www.easttrial.org.

Catheter Ablation as First-Line Therapy in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF), antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are considered a first-line rhythm-control strategy, whereas catheter ablation is a reasonable alternative. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the prevalence, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with PerAF who underwent catheter ablation as a first or second-line strategy. METHODS: This multicenter observational study included consecutive patients with PerAF who underwent first-time ablation between January 2020 and September 2021 in 9 medical centers in the United States. Patients were divided into those who underwent ablation as first-line therapy and those who had ablation as second-line therapy. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 2,083 patients underwent first-time ablation for PerAF. Of these, 1,086 (52%) underwent ablation as a first-line rhythm-control treatment. Compared with patients treated with AADs as first-line therapy, these patients were predominantly male (72.6% vs 68.1%; P = 0.03), with a lower frequency of hypertension (64.0% vs 73.4%; P < 0.001) and heart failure (19.1% vs 30.5%; P < 0.001). During a mean follow-up of 325.9 ± 81.6 days, arrhythmia-free survival was similar between the groups (HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.92-1.41); however, patients in the second-line ablation strategy were more likely to continue receiving AAD therapy (41.5% vs 15.9%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A first-line ablation strategy for PerAF is prevalent in the United States, particularly in men with fewer comorbidities. More data are needed to identify patients with PerAF who derive benefit from an early intervention strategy.

Early Rhythm Control and Incident Dementia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Prior Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Although early rhythm control (ERC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces the risk of stroke, there is no evidence thus far on whether ERC reduces the risk of developing dementia in patients with AF and prior stroke. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate whether ERC reduces the risk of developing dementia in patients with new-onset AF and prior stroke. METHODS: Using the Korean nationwide claims database, we identified patients with new-onset AF and prior stroke between 2010 and 2016. Patients who received rhythm control therapy within 1 year after AF onset were defined as the ERC group, otherwise patients were categorized as the usual care group. A propensity score weighting method was used to balance the 2 groups. Incident dementia defined by relevant diagnostic codes was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 41,370 patients were included (mean age 70 ± 11 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 5.3 ± 1.6): 10,213 in the ERC group and 31,157 in the usual care group. Compared with usual care, ERC was associated with lower risks of all dementia, Alzheimer's dementia, and vascular dementia (weighted HR: 0.825 [95% CI: 0.776-0.876], 0.831 [95% CI: 0.774-0.893], and 0.800 [95% CI: 0.702-0.913], respectively, all P < 0.001). The benefit of ERC was slightly accentuated in the younger age group (<65 years). The beneficial effect of ERC in reducing the risk of dementia was consistent regardless of the characteristics of prior stroke. CONCLUSIONS: ERC might be beneficial in the prevention of dementia in patients with AF and prior stroke. To prevent the progression of cognitive dysfunction, ERC should be considered in this population.

Rhythm vs Rate Control Strategy for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Rhythm control, either with antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation, and rate control strategies are the cornerstones of atrial fibrillation (AF) management. Despite the increasing role of rhythm control over the past few years, it remains inconclusive which strategy is superior in improving clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study summarizes the total and time-varying evidence regarding the efficacy of rhythm- vs rate-control strategies in the management of AF. METHODS: We systematically perused the MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials from inception to November 2023. We included studies that compared the efficacy of rhythm control (ie, antiarrhythmic drugs classes Ia, Ic, or III, AF catheter ablation, and electrical cardioversion) and rate control (ie, beta-blocker, digitalis, or calcium antagonist) strategies among patients with nonvalvular AF. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, whereas secondary outcomes included all-cause death, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure (HF), sinus rhythm at the end of the follow-up, and rhythm control-related adverse events. A cumulative meta-analysis to assess temporal trends and a meta-regression analysis using the percentage of ablation use was performed. RESULTS: We identified 18 studies with a total of 17,536 patients (mean age: 68.6 ± 9.7 years, 37.9% females) and a mean follow-up of 28.5 months. Of those, 31.9% had paroxysmal AF. A rhythm control strategy reduced CV death (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.96), stroke (HR: 0.801; 95% CI: 0.643-0.998), and hospitalization for HF (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69-0.94) but not all-cause death (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73-1.02) compared with a rate control strategy. This benefit was driven by contemporary studies, whereas more ablation use within the rhythm control arm was associated with improved outcomes, except stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF, a contemporary rhythm control strategy leads to reduced CV mortality, HF events, and stroke compared with a rate control strategy.

Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and increasing the risk of death, stroke, heart failure, and dementia. Over the past two decades, there have been significant breakthroughs in AF risk prediction and screening, stroke prevention, rhythm control, catheter ablation, and integrated management. During this period, the scale, quality, and experience of AF management in China have greatly improved, providing a solid foundation for the development of the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF. To further promote standardized AF management, and apply new technologies and concepts to clinical practice timely and fully, the Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association and the Heart Rhythm Committee of Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering jointly developed the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation. The guidelines comprehensively elaborated on various aspects of AF management and proposed the CHA2DS2­VASc­60 stroke risk score based on the characteristics of the Asian AF population. The guidelines also reevaluated the clinical application of AF screening, emphasized the significance of early rhythm control, and highlighted the central role of catheter ablation in rhythm control.

Clinical Impact of Early Rhythm Control and Healthy Lifestyles in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the combined effect of early rhythm control (ERC) and healthy lifestyle (HLS) behaviors on the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate how the combination of ERC and HLS behaviors affects the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF. METHODS: Using the Korean National Health Insurance database, we included patients with new-onset AF between 2009 and 2016 (n = 208,662). Patients who received rhythm control therapy within 2 years after AF diagnosis were defined as the ERC group. Patients with ≥2 HLS behaviors were defined as the HLS group. Patients were categorized into 4 groups: group 1, without ERC and without HLS (n = 46,972); group 2, with HLS alone (n = 110,479); group 3, with ERC alone (n = 15,133); and group 4, with both ERC and HLS (n = 36,078). The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. RESULTS: Compared to group 1, group 2 and group 3 were associated with a lower risk of stroke (HR: 0.769 [95% CI: 0.728-0.881] and HR: 0.774 [95% CI: 0.703-0.852], respectively). Group 4 showed the lowest risk of stroke (HR: 0.575; 95% CI: 0.536-0.617). After propensity score weighting, the incorporation of additional ERC alongside HLS was associated with a relative risk reduction of 22% for stroke, and additional HLS alongside ERC were associated with a relative risk reduction of 27% for stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Each of ERC and HLS might reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with new-onset AF. The presence of both ERC and HLS is associated with an enhanced benefit for stroke prevention in this population.