Patient-reported and radiological outcomes of short Scarf osteotomy fixed with a single screw: A prospective study of 271 osteotomies.

The Scarf osteotomy involves inherent risks and technical challenges. The short scarf osteotomy with single screw fixation has emerged as an alternative approach. This study aims to evaluate the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiological outcomes, and complications associated with the short scarf osteotomy fixed with a single screw for hallux valgus correction. A prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2018 and October 2023 at a single center, encompassing 271 osteotomies. PROMs were collected prospectively preoperatively and at various postoperative intervals. Radiographic data, including hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA), were measured preoperatively and six weeks postoperatively. Complications were also documented. Statistically significant improvements were observed in all PROMs and were sustained up to 24 months postoperatively. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score demonstrated a significant reduction from 46.97 at baseline to 12.52 at 24 months (p < 0.001). Likewise, the EQ-5D score improved notably from 0.73 preoperatively to 0.81 at 24 months (p = 0.002). Analysis of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) revealed substantial improvements across its pain, walking/standing, and social interaction domains over the same period, with all changes showing statistical significance (all p < 0.001). Radiographically, the mean HVA improved significantly from 31.33° preoperatively to 13.33° postoperatively (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean IMA improved significantly from 14.67° to 7.66° (p < 0.001). The most common complication was superficial wound infection, effectively managed with oral antibiotics. The were no cases of avascular necrosis or fracture. In conclusion, the short Scarf osteotomy fixed with a single screw demonstrates favorable outcomes. These findings support its efficacy and safety as a treatment option, with potential advantages over the conventional technique. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Allograft Screws as Fixation of the Scarf Osteotomy.

Background: In comparison to titanium screws, novel cortical bone allograft screws may come with advantages in osseointegration and with avoidance of potential material removal surgery after scarf osteotomy. Methods: A scarf osteotomy with allograft bone screws as fixation was performed in 21 patients (30 feet). Clinical and radiological parameters were prospectively collected until one year after surgery. A retrospective control group, consisting of 75 patients (82 feet) after scarf osteotomy using headless compression screws, was used to compare clinical outcomes. Results: After fixation with allograft bone screws, the mean preoperative AOFAS score increased from 51.5 points preoperatively to 93.5 points one year after surgery. In radiological assessments, a continuous osseointegration with the remodeling of the bone screw was observed in all patients that finished follow-up. However, four metatarsal fractures occurred early postoperatively after fixation using allograft bone screws. There were only three material removal surgeries in patients treated with headless compression screws. Conclusions: Allograft bone screws display a safe fixation and are a biological alternative for scarf osteotomy. Enough distance between the screw and the proximal osteotomy should be ensured to avoid fractures.

Chevron osteotomy and scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle correction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the differences in hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and complication rates between chevron osteotomy and scarf osteotomy for correcting hallux valgus. METHODS: Two investigators independently searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2007 to 2018 on PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Next, chevron and scarf osteotomies were compared for their postoperative outcomes using HVA, IMA, and AOFAS scores and their complication rates. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.3). RESULTS: Six RCTs-comprising 507 feet, of which 261 and 246 underwent chevron and scarf osteotomies, respectively-were included. The meta-analysis revealed that chevron osteotomy led to significantly smaller postoperative HVAs than scarf osteotomy (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.94, 95% CI = - 2.65 to - 1.29, P < .00001). However, the differences in postoperative IMA (WMD = - 0.44, 95% CI = - 1.10 to 0.22, P = .19), postoperative AOFAS scores (WMD = 0.75; 95% CI = - 5.32 to 6.82; P = .81), and complication rates (risk ratio = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.65-2.27, P = .53) between feet that underwent chevron and scarf osteotomies were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with scarf osteotomy, chevron osteotomy had significantly more favorable postoperative outcomes in terms of HVA correction, but not in terms of IMA, AOFAS scores, or complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, systemic review and meta-analysis.

Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of the Dovetailed Notch Scarf Osteotomy for Correcting the First Metatarsal Pronation in Moderate to Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: The traditional scarf osteotomy (TSO) has limited ability to correct the first metatarsal pronation. A novel modification that we refer to as a "dovetailed notch scarf osteotomy" (DNSO) has been developed to enhance the ability to correct coronal plane pronation. The study aimed to observe and compare TSO to DNSO in the treatment of moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity. METHODS: This retrospective study included 78 feet that had a TSO and 105 feet that had a DNSO. Minimum follow-up was 24 months. Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and weightbearing anterior-posterior (AP) radiographs were taken preoperatively and at the last follow-up. We measured the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), hallux valgus angle, distal metatarsal articular surface angle on AP radiographs and first metatarsal coronal pronation angle (α angle), tibial sesamoid coronal grading, and first metatarsal length on WBCT. Clinical assessment was done using visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The occurrence of postoperative complications was also documented. RESULTS: The DNSO group exhibited a significantly higher correction amount of α angle and IMA (14.3 ± 9.9 and 10.3 ± 4.6 degrees) than the TSO group (8.6 ± 5.9 and 5.4 ± 5.9 degrees) during the final follow-up assessment (P < .05).The DNSO group (10.1 [8.0-12.0] degrees and 4.8 [3.9-5.6] degrees) demonstrated significantly smaller α angle and IMA compared with the TSO group (4.8 [3.9-5.6] degrees and 9.5 [7.5-11.5] degrees) at 24 months postsurgery (P < .05). The postoperative FAAM activities of daily living and SF-36 physical functioning scores were significantly higher in the DNSO group (97.2 ± 3.3 and 95.7 ± 4.4 points) compared with the TSO group (92.3 ± 3.3 and 87.7 ± 8.7 points) (P < .05). Additionally, hallux varus occurred in 1 case in the DNSO group, whereas 4 cases were observed in the TSO group. CONCLUSION: Two osteotomy methods can effectively correct moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity. Compared with the TSO, the DNSO has stronger correction ability. The most crucial aspect lies in its controllability when correcting first metatarsal pronation and addressing IMA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Comparative effects of modified rotary scarf osteotomy and traditional scarf osteotomy in treating moderate to severe hallux valgus: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Traditional Scarf osteotomy (TSO) is an effective procedure with a good record in moderate to severe hallux valgus (MSHV) surgery. In order to overcome shortcomings of TSO, Modified Rotary Scarf osteotomy (MRSO) was introduced in this study, which aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcome in the patients treated with MRSO or TSO. METHODS: Of 175 patients (247 feet) with MSHV, 100 patients (138 feet) treated with MRSO and 75 patients (109 feet) treated with TSO were evaluated according to relevant indicators in twenty-four months follow-up. Pre-surgical and post-surgical HVA, IMA, DMAA, MTP-1 ROM, sesamoid grade and AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) scores and postsurgical complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Both groups manifested similar baseline characters. The mean follow-up was of 25.9 (range, 22-37) months. Significantly lower IMA, lower Sesamoid grade and higher DMAA at six months, twelve months and twenty-four months post-surgically had been showed in MRSO group compared to TSO group. There was no significant difference in HVA, MTP-1 ROM and AOFAS data at each follow-up time point post-surgically between the two groups. No major complications occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: MRSO showed comparable results to TSO, and improved IMA and sesamoid grade to a greater extent, with a lower probability of throughing effect. Although DMAA could be increased by MRSO, MRSO could still be a reproducible, non-dangerous and efficacious alternative procedure for treating HV patients which do not have severe DMAA.

Similar outcomes following scarf-Akin osteotomy compared to scarf-alone osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients undergoing scarf osteotomy and scarf-Akin osteotomy for the management of hallux valgus deformity. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting clinical data following scarf osteotomy and scarf-Akin osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus were included and assessed. The level and quality of evidence of the included studies were also evaluated. RESULTS: Four studies were included. In total, 388 patients (408 toes) underwent scarf osteotomy alone and 287 patients (295 toes) underwent scarf-Akin osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity. There was no difference in postoperative American orthopedic foot and ankle society scores (p = 0.7828), visual analog scale scores (p = 0.4558), hallux valgus angle (p = 0.5116), intermetatarsal angle (p = 0.4830), proximal to distal phalangeal articular angle (p = 0.2411) between the scarf alone cohort and the scarf-Akin cohort. Similarly, there was no difference in complication rates (p = 0.6881) nor secondary surgical procedure rates (p = 0.3678) between the 2 cohorts. Finally, there was a higher recurrence rate in the scarf-alone cohort (11.4%) compared to the scarf-Akin cohort (5.7%), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.4414). CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrates lower recurrence rates following scarf-Akin osteotomy compared to scarf osteotomy alone for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity. No difference in complication rates were noted between the 2 cohorts. Our review demonstrates that both the scarf osteotomy and the scarf-Akin osteotomy may be effective and safe procedures, however, the scarf-Akin osteotomy may provide more long-term benefit in the setting of moderate to severe hallux valgus.

Changes in Radiographic Alignment Following Metatarsophalangeal Fusion, Distal Metatarsal Osteotomy, and Lapidus.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the different surgical treatments for hallux valgus on various radiographic measures of bunion correction. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single academic medical center involving 2 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons. One hundred and nineteen feet (110 patients) were included. Procedures included first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis (n = 88), Chevron and/or Scarf osteotomy (n = 23), and Lapidus (n = 8). Overall, 78.2% of patients were female, mean age was 60.49 (range, 16-81) years, and mean follow-up was 1.20 (range, 0.25-3.92) years. RESULTS: Hallux valgus angle (HVA) significantly differed preoperatively (MTP = 33.33°, Chevron/Scarf = 27.03°, Lapidus = 32.56°; P = .026). There was no difference in distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) preoperatively (MTP = 18.87°, Chevron/Scarf = 17.80°, Lapidus = 14.39°; P = .629). At final follow-up, DMAA was significantly greatest among the Lapidus bunionectomy cohort (MTP = 9.63°, Chevron/Scarf = 13.51°, Lapidus = 17.45°; P = .005). There was no difference in infection (MTP = 6.8%, Chevron/Scarf = 4.4%, Lapidus = 0.0%; P = 1.00) or reoperation (MTP = 19.3%, Chevron/Scarf = 21.7%, Lapidus = 12.5%; P = .921) rates between cohorts, although both rates were highest in the first MTP arthrodesis group. CONCLUSION: Among the 3 hallux valgus corrections studied, Lapidus bunionectomy fared the worst regarding DMAA correction at first follow-up and final follow-up, compared with MTP fusion and distal metatarsal osteotomies. Other radiographic measures showed no significant difference among the groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Retrospective cohort study.

Scarf osteotomy for reduction of tailors bunion deformities: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tailors bunions are common forefoot deformities affecting the fifth MPJ, with challenging symptomatology often resistant to conservative care. Currently no gold standard exists for the surgical management of tailor's bunions, although the scarf osteotomy has been described as a versatile option for reducing these deformities. METHODS: Relevant electronic databases were searched to collate all studies pertaining to tailors bunion correction using the scarf osteotomy between 2000 and 2021. Both surgeon and patient reported outcomes were required to be included in the systematic review. Methodological quality assessment and risk of bias was performed for each study. Statistical analysis of outcomes and complications was measured. Four small scale case series studies met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: All studies demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of 4th inter-metatarsal angles, improvement in clinical and patient reported outcome measures. 15% complication rate was identified, however recurring plantar hyperkeratoses were the most frequent, with one study suggesting a relationship with Pes Cavus. All four studies demonstrated significant methodological short comings and high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Scarf osteotomy provides good reduction of tailors' bunion deformities, demonstrates low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. Foot and Ankle surgeons should counsel patients' accordingly on risk of recurrence where hyperkeratosis is a key complaint.

Modified scarf osteotomy with capsular interposition as salvage for resection or silicone implant arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A report of three cases.

This study investigated modified scarf osteotomy as a salvage procedure after resection arthroplasty or silicone implant arthroplasty to preserve mobility of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint after hallux valgus surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated three feet with rheumatoid forefoot deformities that showed recurrence of forefoot deformity or breakage of the implant after resection or silicone implant arthroplasty in the first MTP joint. All feet were treated using modified scarf osteotomy with capsular interposition. All cases achieved obvious correction after modified scarf osteotomy despite resection of the first MTP joint and consequently showed both radiographic and clinical improvements. Modified scarf osteotomy offers potential as a definitive salvage procedure after resection arthroplasty or silicone implant arthroplasty for forefoot deformity in patients with RA, because the procedure can realign the first MTP joint obviously with preservation of the range of motion. Concomitant medial capsular interposition into the newly formed first MTP joint is also recommended where possible, to protect the edges of the proximal basal phalanx and distal first metatarsal and also to smoothen the motion of newly formed first MTP joint.

Zapato de suela rígida versus zapato de suela invertida en la cirugía de hallux valgus: análisis clínico, funcional y radiológico / Rigid sole shoe versus inverted sole shoe in hallux valgus surgery: clinical, functional and radiological analysis

Resumen: Introducción: el calzado ortopédico suele prescribirse en el postoperatorio de cirugía de hallux valgus para proteger la osteotomía y mantener la funcionalidad al paciente. En este sentido, la superioridad del zapato de suela rígida en comparación con el zapato de suela invertida sigue siendo controvertido. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados clínicos, funcionales y radiológicos entre el uso del zapato de suela rígida (ZSR) y el zapato de suela invertida (ZSI) después de la cirugía de hallux valgus. Material y métodos: un total de 57 pacientes intervenidos de hallux valgus fueron incluidos y analizados retrospectivamente. En un grupo se incluyeron 28 pacientes que usaron el ZSR, mientras que el segundo grupo incluyó a 29 pacientes que usaron el ZSI. El zapato ortopédico se usó durante seis semanas tras la cirugía. Se recogieron datos clínicos (dolor lumbar y articular de las extremidades inferiores, necesidad de muletas y problemas para subir y bajar escaleras), datos radiológicos (AIM, AHV), así como complicaciones postoperatorias (desplazamiento de osteotomía, fractura del primer metatarsiano o seudoartrosis). Resultados: el zapato de suela rígida mostró menor dificultad para subir y bajar escaleras (OR 3.8 (IC 95% 1.2-12.8), p 0.02), sólo para subir (OR 3.2 (IC 95% 1.1-10), p 0.03), así como una disminución de la necesidad de muletas (OR 1.7 (IC 95% 1.04-2.6), p < 0.03). El dolor de columna lumbar o articular de extremidades inferiores no mostró diferencias estadísticas. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticas en los datos epidemiológicos y radiológicos entre los grupos. Conclusiones: el zapato de suela parece aportar más comodidad a los pacientes sin aumentar las complicaciones radiológicas.

Abstract: Introduction: the orthopedic shoe is usually prescribed during postoperative care after hallux valgus surgery to protect the osteotomy and provide functional comfort to the patient. In this regard, the superiority of rigid sole shoe (RSS) compared to the reverse camber shoe (RCS) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes from using the rigid sole shoe (RSS) vs. the reverse camber shoe (RCS) after hallux valgus surgery. Material and methods: fifty-seven hallux valgus surgery patients were included and analyzed retrospectively. The 1st group included 28 patients using the RSS and the 2nd group included 29 patients using the RCS. The orthopedic shoe was used for six weeks postoperatively. Clinical data (lumbar and lower limb pain, need of crutches and problems with going up and down stairs), radiological data (IMA, HVA) and postoperative complications (displacement of osteotomy, metatarsal fracture or non-union) were collected. Results: the RSS showed less difficulty going up and down stairs (OR 3.8 (CI 95% 1.2-12.8), p 0.02), only going upstairs (OR 3.2 (CI 95% 1.1-10), p 0.03), as well as a decreased need for crutches (OR 1.7 (CI 95% 1.04-2.6), p < 0.03). Lumbar spine or lower limb pain did not show any statistical differences. No statistical differences in the epidemiological and radiological data were found between the groups. Conclusions: the RSS seems to provide more comfort to the patients without worsening the radiological results.

A Better Treatment for Moderate to Severe Hallux Valgus: Scarf + Akin Osteotomy Combined with Lateral Soft Tissue Release in a Single Medial Incision.

OBJECTIVE: Traditional lateral soft tissue release (LSTR) was conducted by an additional dorsal first web incision, as the malformed thick scar and neuritis were common after surgery. A new method of lateral soft tissue release in a single medial incision via dorsal flap over the first metatarsal (LSTR-SMI-DFFM) should be recommended. The objective is to investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of scarf + Akin osteotomy (SAO) combined with lateral soft tissue release in a single medial incision via dorsal flap over the first metatarsal (LSTR-SMI-DFFM) for moderate to severe hallux valgus. METHODS: Patients who were performed surgery for hallux valgus from April 2014 to June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The visual analog scale (VAS) was recorded before surgery and during follow-up, as well as the forefoot score of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS). Patient satisfaction was evaluated at the follow-up time. The preoperative and follow-up weightbearing X-ray were conducted in all patients. The radiological parameters of hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) were measured. Tibial sesamoid position (TSP) was also recorded according to seven-part grading system. The quantitative data were performed as mean ± standard deviation or median ± interquartile range. Student's t test was performed in HVA, IMA, and DMAA. The TSP, VAS, and AOFAS were statistical analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 123 feet conducted surgery in 96 patients. The AOFAS score improved a lot which was preoperative 39 to 100 at the follow-up time and VAS was 4 to 0 (p < 0.001). A total of 63 (51.2%) patients were very satisfied, 47 (38.2%) were satisfied, five (4.1%) were undecided and eight (6.5%) were not satisfied. The HVA, IMA, DMAA, and TSP were all decreased after surgery and were statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SAO combined with a LSTR-SMI-DFFM for moderate to severe hallux valgus is effective and safe with pretty good clinical and radiographic results, as well as minimal complications. The corrections of AOFAS and VAS conformed to the minimum clinically important difference (MCID).

Hallux valgus with second metatarsalgia: Is second metatarsal Weil osteotomy necessary?

BACKGROUND: The role of concomitant Weil osteotomy to address second toe metatarsalgia during hallux valgus correction is unclear. We aimed to critically analyse outcomes of an additional Weil osteotomy versus isolated Scarf osteotomy.in the management of hallux valgus and second metatarsalgia. METHODS: Patients with second toe metatarsalgia who underwent first metatarsal Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus were enrolled retrospectively. Demographics, radiographic measurements and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6-months and 2-years postoperatively. Between-group significance was established with Fisher exact test, Chi-square or Mann-Whitney U test. Within-group changes from baseline were assessed with paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: 48 feet (34 isolated Scarf, 14 concomitant Weil osteotomy) were included. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements across all measures of functional outcome. However, patients with additional Weil osteotomy reported poorer short-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: Superiority of additional Weil osteotomy versus isolated Scarf osteotomy in addressing second toe metatarsalgia or improving functional outcomes was not demonstrated.

Rotation scarf + Akin osteotomy for severe hallux valgus with a new evaluation index: distance between the first and second metatarsals.

BACKGROUND: Although rotation scarf + Akin osteotomy has been described for correcting hallux valgus deformity, the treatment efficacy of rotation scarf + Akin osteotomy for severe hallux valgus should be further studied. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of rotation scarf + Akin osteotomy on severe hallux valgus. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with hallux valgus who underwent surgery using rotation scarf + Akin osteotomy in our hospital between June 2014 and January 2020. The parameters evaluated include (1) the hallux valgus angle (HVA), (2) intermetatarsal angle (IMA), (3) distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), (4) tibial sesamoid position (TSP), (5) the length of first metatarsal bone and (6) ratio between the vertical distance from the lateral of the first metatarsal head to the medial of the second metatarsal head and the vertical distance of lateral of the second metatarsal head to the medial of the third metatarsal head (MT-I to II/II to III distance). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain before and at the last follow-up after the operation. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Forefoot Score wasassessed before and at the last follow-up after the operation. Patient satisfaction assessment was also conducted at the time. RESULTS: All radiological parameters including, HVA, IMA, DMAA and TSP,, significantly improved (p < 0.001). The length of the first metatarsal was shortened 3.1 mm on average. The MT-I to II/II to III distance was also reduced to 1.8 after surgery and 3.3 before surgery. The VAS score and AOFAS score was also statistically significant before operation and at the last follow-up after the operation (p < 0.001). Forty-one (82%) feet in patients were very satisfied or satisfied. CONCLUSION: Rotation scarf + Akin osteotomy is demonstrated to be safe, effective, and feasible for correcting severe hallux valgus. It can obtain good long-term correction with a low incidence of recurrence and metatarsalgia. Postoperative satisfaction and functional recovery of patients are significantly improved. The MT-I to II/II to III distance, a new evaluation indicator, can be better evaluate the correction of hallux valgus.

The influence of concomitant hammertoe correction on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hallux valgus correction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hallux valgus often develop secondary hammertoe deformities of the lesser toes. Operative management of bunions with hammertoe can be more extensive; however, it is unclear whether this affects patient-reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative patient-reported outcome measures and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent isolated bunion correction and patients who underwent simultaneous bunion and hammertoe correction. METHODS: Preoperative, postoperative, and change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were compared between patients who underwent isolated hallux valgus correction and those who underwent concomitant hammertoe correction. Radiographic measures including hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal-articular angle (DMAA), and Meary's angle were also compared. Targeted minimum-loss estimation (TMLE) was used for statistical analysis to control for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 221 feet (134 isolated bunion correction, 87 concomitant hammertoe correction) with a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included in this study. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in the physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, and global physical health PROMIS domains (all p < 0.001). However, patients in the concomitant hammertoe cohort had significantly less improvements in pain interference and pain intensity (p < 0.01, p < 0.05 respectively). The concomitant hammertoe cohort also had significantly higher postoperative pain interference scores than the isolated bunion cohort (p < 0.01). Radiographic outcomes did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: While both isolated bunion correction and concomitant hammertoe correction yielded clinically significant improvements in patient reported outcomes and normalized radiographic parameters, patients undergoing simultaneous bunion and hammertoe correction experienced substantially less improvement in postoperative pain-related outcomes than those who underwent isolated bunion correction.

Preoperative Expectations Versus Reality: A Patient Experience Study Following Scarf Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Correction.

The relationship between managing patient expectations and postoperative functional outcomes has been studied widely in other areas of orthopedics, but there is a paucity of information in the foot and ankle literature. The primary objective of the study was to identify the most common patient "expectations" from hallux valgus surgery and establish over what time period postsurgery they would meet those goals. A prospective study of 45 consecutive patients was performed at a single center. This included adult patients (>18 years old) that underwent a scarf osteotomy for primary hallux valgus correction. Patients were followed up for 6 months and completed pre- and postoperative Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scale scores. A separate "expectations" questionnaire was designed and completed assessing the patient's preoperative rehabilitation expectations compared to the actual time taken to achieve those goals. These included 5 domains: pain improvement, return to walking unaided, return to normal foot sensation, return to normal footwear, and return to driving. The postoperative functional scores demonstrated statistically significant improvement postsurgery (p < .001). It also highlighted the overall time frame over which the above expectations were met. On average, patients achieved satisfactory pain improvements 1.4 weeks earlier than expected (p < .001) along with trends toward an earlier return to driving function of patient expectation (p < .05). Patients can thus be reliably informed that their pain symptoms are likely to settle within one month of surgery. This should allow patients to prepare for their rehabilitation more informed, thus facilitating earlier weightbearing and return to function.

Third-Generation Minimally Invasive Chevron-Akin Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Produces Similar Clinical and Radiological Outcomes as Scarf-Akin Osteotomy at 2 Years: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive chevron-Akin (MICA) osteotomy is an increasingly popular technique for the correction of hallux valgus. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing it with traditional open techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of the MICA osteotomy using a new-generation MICA screw and scarf-Akin osteotomy for hallux valgus correction. METHODS: Thirty cases of MICA osteotomy were propensity score matched 1:1 with a control group of 30 scarf-Akin osteotomy cases. The groups were matched for age, sex, body mass index, preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (MTP-IP) score, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS), preoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and concomitant procedures. Outcomes were compared at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Early postoperative VAS scores were also compared. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS score, AOFAS score, and SF-36 PCS and MCS at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. For the MICA group, HVA improved from 23.5 to 7.7 degrees, and IMA improved from 13.5 to 7.5 degrees. For the scarf-Akin osteotomy group, HVA improved from 23.7 to 9.3 degrees, and IMA improved from 13.6 to 7.8 degrees. The first 24-hour postoperative VAS score was significantly lower in the MICA group compared with the scarf-Akin group (2.0 ± 2.0 vs 3.4 ± 2.6, P = .029). However, there was no significant difference in clinical or radiological outcomes between the groups at 6 and 24 months. CONCLUSION: The MICA procedure with the new-generation MICA screw is an attractive option for the correction of hallux valgus, yielding similar midterm radiological and clinical outcomes compared with the well-established scarf-Akin osteotomy. The first 24-hour postoperative VAS score in the MICA group was also statistically lower, although its clinical significance remains to be determined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

[Rigid sole shoe versus inverted sole shoe in hallux valgus surgery: clinical, functional and radiological analysis]. / Zapato de suela rígida versus zapato de suela invertida en la cirugía de hallux valgus: análisis clínico, funcional y radiológico.

INTRODUCTION: the orthopedic shoe is usually prescribed during postoperative care after hallux valgus surgery to protect the osteotomy and provide functional comfort to the patient. In this regard, the superiority of rigid sole shoe (RSS) compared to the reverse camber shoe (RCS) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical, functional and radiological outcomes from using the rigid sole shoe (RSS) vs. the reverse camber shoe (RCS) after hallux valgus surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: fifty-seven hallux valgus surgery patients were included and analyzed retrospectively. The 1st group included 28 patients using the RSS and the 2nd group included 29 patients using the RCS. The orthopedic shoe was used for six weeks postoperatively. Clinical data (lumbar and lower limb pain, need of crutches and problems with going up and down stairs), radiological data (IMA, HVA) and postoperative complications (displacement of osteotomy, metatarsal fracture or non-union) were collected. RESULTS: the RSS showed less difficulty going up and down stairs (OR 3.8 (CI 95% 1.2-12.8), p 0.02), only going upstairs (OR 3.2 (CI 95% 1.1-10), p 0.03), as well as a decreased need for crutches (OR 1.7 (CI 95% 1.04-2.6), p < 0.03). Lumbar spine or lower limb pain did not show any statistical differences. No statistical differences in the epidemiological and radiological data were found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: the RSS seems to provide more comfort to the patients without worsening the radiological results.

INTRODUCCIÓN: el calzado ortopédico suele prescribirse en el postoperatorio de cirugía de hallux valgus para proteger la osteotomía y mantener la funcionalidad al paciente. En este sentido, la superioridad del zapato de suela rígida en comparación con el zapato de suela invertida sigue siendo controvertido. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar los resultados clínicos, funcionales y radiológicos entre el uso del zapato de suela rígida (ZSR) y el zapato de suela invertida (ZSI) después de la cirugía de hallux valgus. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: un total de 57 pacientes intervenidos de hallux valgus fueron incluidos y analizados retrospectivamente. En un grupo se incluyeron 28 pacientes que usaron el ZSR, mientras que el segundo grupo incluyó a 29 pacientes que usaron el ZSI. El zapato ortopédico se usó durante seis semanas tras la cirugía. Se recogieron datos clínicos (dolor lumbar y articular de las extremidades inferiores, necesidad de muletas y problemas para subir y bajar escaleras), datos radiológicos (AIM, AHV), así como complicaciones postoperatorias (desplazamiento de osteotomía, fractura del primer metatarsiano o seudoartrosis). RESULTADOS: el zapato de suela rígida mostró menor dificultad para subir y bajar escaleras (OR 3.8 (IC 95% 1.2-12.8), p 0.02), sólo para subir (OR 3.2 (IC 95% 1.1-10), p 0.03), así como una disminución de la necesidad de muletas (OR 1.7 (IC 95% 1.04-2.6), p < 0.03). El dolor de columna lumbar o articular de extremidades inferiores no mostró diferencias estadísticas. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticas en los datos epidemiológicos y radiológicos entre los grupos. CONCLUSIONES: el zapato de suela parece aportar más comodidad a los pacientes sin aumentar las complicaciones radiológicas.

Iatrogenic second transfer metatarsalgia and the first metatarsal shortening and elevation after Scarf osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Transfer metatarsalgia is a potential complication of hallux valgus surgery. This study aimed to investigate the shortened first metatarsal length and elevation and to compare groups with and without second transfer metatarsalgia after Scarf osteotomy. METHODS: The first metatarsal length of 123 feet was measured via the Maestro's method using the metatarsal axial length and the relative second metatarsal protrusion to the first metatarsal. Metatarsal elevation was measured using the first metatarsal angle. RESULTS: Second transfer metatarsalgia occurred after Scarf osteotomy in 11 (8.9%) feet. When baseline characteristics were considered in propensity score matching, the 11 feet were compared with the 33 feet in the control group. The group with transfer metatarsalgia showed a more shortened first metatarsal axial length (-4.1 ± 1.8 mm vs. -2.5 ± 2.2 mm, p = 0.032), a significantly longer relative second metatarsal protrusion (+5.8 ± 2.6 mm vs. +1.2 ± 2.6 mm, p < 0.001), and a significantly lower first metatarsal angle (18.1 ± 4.3° vs. 21.5 ± 4.0°, p = 0.012) than the control group postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid iatrogenic transfer metatarsalgia, first metatarsal length shortening should be minimized to at least less than 4.0 mm. Furthermore, the metatarsal parabola should be retained.

Clinical Outcomes of Scarf-Akin Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus With Simultaneous Bunionette Correction: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis.

Hallux valgus and bunionette (Tailor's bunion) deformities are debilitating forefoot deformities that may occur together. Successful outcomes of surgery for either pathology have been well-described; however, the literature is sparce on outcomes of patients undergoing simultaneous surgery for both deformities. Between 2007 and 2018, 429 patients underwent a scarf-Akin osteotomy, and 20 patients underwent simultaneous bunionette surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match the scarf + bunionette group in a 1:2 ratio to a corresponding scarf only group using logistic regression. Their hallux and fifth metatarsal visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale, Short Form-36 (SF-36), expectations and satisfaction scores were recorded at preoperative, 6-month and 2-year intervals. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups after matching (p > .05). At 6 months, the scarf + bunionette group had a significantly worse fifth metatarsal AOFAS (80.7 vs 92.9, p = .002) and VAS (1.5 vs 0.1, p = .008). However, at 2 years, greater improvements in the scarf + bunionette group resulted in no significant differences for fifth metatarsal AOFAS and VAS. The scarf + bunionette group had better SF-36 scores in the domains of physical functioning, bodily pain, general health and mental health (p < .05). Scarf + bunionette patients trended toward higher satisfaction (100.0% vs 85.0%, p = .165) and expectation fulfilment (95.0% vs 80.0%, p = .249) at 2 years, although not significant with the available numbers. In patients with similar baseline hallux and fifth metatarsal pain and function, simultaneous surgery and a scarf osteotomy alone result in similar improvements to pain and function at 2 years. However, patients who undergo both procedures have higher quality of life scores.

Revisiting the original Akin technique: A comparative analysis of radiographic outcome.

BACKGROUND: The Akin osteotomy is widely used to correct the hallux valgus and different fixation techniques have been proposed. Currently most of these procedures coexist, with disagreement on which offers the best results. The aim of this study is to compare the radiological outcome of the original Akin's technique with one in which a staple was used to stabilize the osteotomy. We also assessed whether other factors unrelated to the osteosynthesis could influence the radiological outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 118 patients who underwent a scarf and Akin osteotomy. In 60 patients the Akin osteotomy was fixed with a staple and in 58 cases no staple was used. Hallux valgus angle (HVA), distal articular set angle (DASA), interphalangeal angle (IPA) and tibial sesamoid position were measured. The presence of lateral cortex disruption of the phalanx was also included in the analysis. RESULTS: Six variables significantly influenced the radiological results of the Akin osteotomy: preoperative HVA, IPA and tibial sesamoid position, laterality, postoperative cortical disruption and use of a staple. CONCLUSION: Ours results suggest that the original Akin's technique seems to offer equal or better results than a variation in which a staple is added to stabilize the osteotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This is a level III retrospective case-control study.