Semaglutide as a promising treatment for hypothalamic obesity: a six-month case series on four females with craniopharyngioma.

PURPOSE: Patients with hypothalamic pathology often develop hypothalamic obesity, causing severe metabolic alterations resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Treatments for hypothalamic obesity have not proven very effective, although the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide has been shown to have positive effects. We examined semaglutide's effect on weight loss in a sample of patients with hypothalamic obesity. METHODS: Four female patients with hypothalamic obesity resulting from treatment of craniopharyngiomas were treated with semaglutide for six months. Whole Body Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans were performed, and blood samples drawn at baseline and after six months. Semaglutide dosages were increased monthly along with tracking of body weight and eating behavior (Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, TFEQ-R18). RESULTS: BMI was reduced in all cases, with an average of 7.9 BMI (range: 6.7 to 10.1) corresponding to a weight loss of 17.0% (range: 11.3-22.4%) or 20.2 kg (range 16.2 kg to 23.4 kg). We found a comparable reduction in total fat mass (17.2%, p = 0.006) and lean mass (16.0%, p = 0.05), whereas bone mass was unchanged (2.6%, p = 0.12). All cases reported an increase in energy levels, improved mobility and physical activity. Unfavorable eating behaviors were reduced after 1 month of treatment (emotional eating - 41 points, p = 0.02, uncontrolled eating - 23 points, p = 0.11). HbA1c and total cholesterol were significantly reduced (p = 0.014 for both). CONCLUSION: Semaglutide is a promising and safe treatment option for HO, that improves eating behavior, reduces weight, and improves metabolic markers.

Effects of excess high-normal alanine aminotransferase levels in relation to new-onset metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: Clinical implications.

In this editorial, we comment on the article by Chen et al recently published in 2024. We focus the debate on whether reducing the upper limit of normal of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) would effectively identify cases of fibrosis in metabolic-dysfunction associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). This is important given the increasing prevalence of MAFLD and obesity globally. Currently, a suitable screening test to identify patients in the general population does not exist and most patients are screened after the finding of an abnormal ALT. The authors of this paper challenge the idea of what a normal ALT is and whether that threshold should be lowered, particularly as their study found that 83.12% of their study population with a diagnosis of MAFLD had a normal ALT. The main advantages of screening would be to identify patients and provide intervention early, the mainstay of this being changing modifiable risk factors and monitoring for liver fibrosis. However, there is not enough suitable therapeutic options available as of yet although this is likely to change in the coming years with more targets for therapy being discovered. Semaglutide is one example of this which has demonstrated benefit with an acceptable side effect profile for those patients with MAFLD and obesity, although studies have not yet shown a significant improvement in fibrosis regression. It would also require a huge amount of resource if a reduced ALT level alone was used as criteria; it is more likely that current scoring systems such as fibrosis-4 may be amended to represent this additional risk. Currently, there is not a good argument to recommend widespread screening with a reduced ALT level as this is unlikely to be cost-effective. This is compounded by the fact that there is a significant heterogeneity in what is considered a normal ALT between laboratories. Although studies previously have suggested a more pragmatic approach in screening those over the age of 60, this is likely to change with the increasing incidence of obesity within the younger age groups. The main message from this study is that those who have hypercholesterolemia and high body metabolic index should have these risk factors modified to maintain a lower level of ALT to reduce the risk of progression to fibrosis and cirrhosis.

The cost-effectiveness of semaglutide in reducing cardiovascular risk among people with overweight and obesity and existing cardiovascular disease, but without diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People with Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) trial demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular outcomes in people with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and overweight or obesity (but without diabetes). However, the cost of the medication has raised concerns about its financial viability and accessibility within healthcare systems. This study explored whether use of semaglutide for the secondary prevention of CVD in overweight or obesity is cost-effective from the Australian healthcare perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed based on the SELECT trial to model the clinical outcomes and costs of a hypothetical population treated with semaglutide versus placebo, in addition to standard care, and followed up over 20 years. With each annual cycle, subjects were at risk of having non-fatal CVD events or dying. Model inputs were derived from SELECT and published literature. Costs were obtained from Australian sources. All outcomes were discounted by 5% annually. The main outcome of interest was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of cost per year of life saved (YoLS) and cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: With an annual estimated cost of semaglutide of A${\$}$4175, the model resulted in ICERs of A${\$}$99 853 (US${\$}$143 504; £40 873) per YoLS and A${\$}$96 055 (US${\$}$138 046; £39 318) per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of A${\$}$50 000, semaglutide is not considered cost-effective at the current price. A price of ≤ A${\$}$2000 per year or more targeted use in high-risk patients would be needed for it to be considered cost-effective in the Australian setting.

Problematic Pharmacokinetics: A Case of Recurrent Pancreatitis Post Discontinuation of a Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are guideline recommended agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and select agents (liraglutide and semaglutide) are FDA approved as anti-obesity pharmacotherapy options. These drugs act on the incretin hormone system within the body to revive insulin excretion, delay gastric emptying, and inhibit the production of glucagon from pancreatic alpha cells. Acute pancreatitis is a serious condition that may have a fatal outcome. It has been shown, and is now part of the prescribing information label, that GLP-1RA agents can cause changes in the pancreas that may ultimately lead to pancreatitis. We describe the case of a 53-year-old female patient with uncontrolled type II diabetes mellitus, who experienced multiple episodes of pancreatitis, from what we suspect was due to repeated exposure to the GLP-1 RA agent, semaglutide. After discontinuation of semaglutide, our patient experienced another episode of pancreatitis roughly 15-week later; which we believe may be due to the patient experiencing the effects of a smoldering pancreas brought on by repeated injury and prolonged circulation of semaglutide post-discontinuation.

Efficacy and safety of switching from a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor to oral semaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Background: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) are the most widely used oral hypoglycemic drugs in Japan. However, once-daily oral semaglutide has been reported to reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight (BW) without causing significant hypoglycemia. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from a DPP-4i to oral semaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study of the changes in HbA1c and BW in 68 patients with T2D who were switched from a DPP-4i and took oral semaglutide for ≥ 6 months, without changes in any other oral hypoglycemic agent. Results: Mean HbA1c decreased from 7.8 to 7.0% (p < 0.001) and BW decreased from 74.2 to 71.2 kg (p < 0.001) over 6 months. The decrease in HbA1c was more pronounced in participants with high baseline HbA1c (r = - 0.542, p < 0.001). There was also a trend (r = 0.236, p = 0.052) toward a decrease in BW in individuals with shorter disease duration. There were reductions in either HbA1c or BW in 65 participants (95.6%). In addition, the larger the decrease in HbA1c was, the greater was the decrease in BW (r = 0.480, p < 0.001). Eighteen participants (20.1%) discontinued the drug within 6 months, of whom 10 (11.6% of the total) did so because of suspected adverse effects and the discontinuation rate was the highest in older, non-obese patients. Conclusions: Switching from a DPP-4i to oral semaglutide may be useful for Japanese patients with T2D who have inadequate glycemic or BW control. However, its utility may be limited by gastrointestinal adverse effects in certain patients.

Effect of semaglutide on primary prevention of diabetic kidney disease in people with type 2 diabetes: A post hoc analysis of the SUSTAIN 6 randomized controlled trial.

AIM: Efficient primary prevention of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is currently lacking. The identification of people at high DKD risk and timely intervention are key to preventing DKD. Therefore, a model to classify people according to their risk for developing DKD was developed previously and used in the current analysis to assess the effect of semaglutide versus placebo on primary DKD prevention. METHODS: Participants with type 2 diabetes from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled SUSTAIN 6 trial without DKD at baseline who received 0.5/1.0 mg semaglutide or placebo were grouped by baseline DKD risk, calculated using a validated model. The main post hoc outcome was the effect of semaglutide versus placebo on the proportion of participants who developed DKD [urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥30 mg/g and/or estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2]. Additional post hoc outcomes included changes in DKD risk score, UACR and estimated glomerular filtration rate over time. RESULTS: Of the total 1139 participants included in the analysis, 28.7% developed DKD; more participants with a high DKD risk (952/1139) developed DKD. Semaglutide significantly reduced the risk of developing DKD in both the total [odds ratio 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.42; 0.74; p < 0.0001)], and high DKD risk population [odds ratio 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.38; 0.69; p < 0.0001)] and significantly delayed DKD development versus placebo. The beneficial effects of semaglutide were largely driven by UACR changes. The number needed to treat for semaglutide in the high DKD risk population was 7. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc study indicates that semaglutide may have beneficial effects on primary DKD prevention in people with T2D.

Weighing your options-intragastric balloon versus semaglutide.

INTRODUCTION: Over half of Americans and up to 78% of US Veteran population meet criteria for obesity. Perioperatively placed intragastric balloon (IGB) can accelerate weight loss goals for safe surgical candidacy, however weight regain is common after removal. Glucagon-like peptide-1-receptor agonists (GLP1RA) may provide a more sustainable weight loss solution after surgery. We hypothesize that weight regain will be less at 1 year after initiation of GLP1RA than IGB placement in Veterans. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospective databases of perioperatively placed intragastric balloon cohort from 1/2019-1/2023 compared to patients who received initiatory GLP1RA from 6/2021-8/2022 at a VA Medical Center(VAMC). All patients were enrolled in the VAMC MOVE! multidisciplinary weight management program for a minimum of 12 weeks. Outcomes measured were patients' weights at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months and weight change for these intervals. Exclusion criteria included history of bariatric surgery and incomplete weight loss data. RESULTS: Two-hundred-twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria; 110 (49%) patients excluded. Mean age was 54 ± 11 years, the majority (78, 69%) were male, and the mean initial BMI was 37 ± 5.9 kg/m2. Seventeen (15%) patients underwent IGB placement and 96 (85%) patients received semaglutide. Weight (kg) change was measured at intervals: 0-3 months:- 11.8(- 17,- 9.5) IGB vs. - 5.1(- 7.4,- 2.3) semaglutide, p < 0.0001; 0-6 months:- 12.7(- 18.4,- 9.9) vs. - 9.4(- 12.6,- 6.1), p = 0.03; 3-6 months:- 0.5(- 2.3,2.3) vs. - 4.3(- 6.8,- 1.6), p < 0.0001; 6-12 months:3(0,7.3) vs. - 1.9(- 4.7,1), p = 0.0006. CONCLUSION: Weight loss occurs more rapidly in the first 6 months after intragastric balloon placement compared to semaglutide (- 12.7 vs. - 9.4 kg, p = 0.03). Despite ongoing attendance in a comprehensive weight loss program, weight regain is common after IGB removal by an average of 3 kg (23.6%) at 1 year. In contrast, patients on GLP1RA (semaglutide) continue to lose weight during this period. Further studies are needed to determine if optimal long-term outcomes may result from combination therapy with intragastric balloon and semaglutide.

Assessing the Renal Outcomes of Semaglutide in Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes, posing a significant health burden. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has shown promise in mitigating renal outcomes in DKD. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the renal effects of semaglutide in individuals with DKD. A comprehensive literature search identified six eligible studies, including two case reports and four cohorts, from diverse geographic locations. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence and other renal biomarkers. The impact of semaglutide on eGFR was variable, with some studies reporting decreases and others showing improvements or no significant changes. Albuminuria, however, was more consistently reduced, particularly in patients with macroalbuminuria. Notably, the case reports described semaglutide-associated AKI, including acute interstitial nephritis, highlighting the need for careful monitoring during therapy. Beyond renal outcomes, semaglutide consistently improved glycemic control and promoted weight loss, with generally manageable gastrointestinal side effects. The findings suggest that semaglutide may effectively reduce albuminuria in DKD, potentially slowing disease progression. However, the risk of AKI and the variable impact on eGFR underscore the need for a personalized approach and vigilant monitoring, particularly in patients with advanced CKD. Future large-scale, long-term randomized controlled trials are warranted to definitively assess the renal benefits and risks of semaglutide in DKD.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for weight management: A review for the gynecologic oncologist.

The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) has experienced rapid growth amidst the obesity epidemic in the United States. While originally developed for glucose control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, the scope of these agents now extends to encompass weight loss and cardiovascular risk reduction. GLP-1RAs have the potential to induce significant weight loss, in combination with lifestyle modifications, among adults who are overweight or obese. Furthermore, these agents demonstrate efficacy in ameliorating hyperglycemia, enhancing insulin sensitivity, regulating blood pressure, improving cardiometabolic parameters, mitigating kidney dysfunction, and potentially reducing the risk of several obesity-related cancers. Drug-related toxicity is primarily gastrointestinal and active management can prevent drug discontinuation. Obesity is associated both with an increased incidence of malignancy but also with decreased survival. More research is needed to evaluate the potential use of GLP-1RA to modify the endocrine function of adipocytes, regulate the chronic inflammatory state associated with obesity, and prospective applications in oncology. These agents can impact patients with gynecologic malignancies both through their direct mechanism of action as well as potential drug toxicity.

Real-world safety profile of once-weekly semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes: Analysis of pooled data from the SemaglUtide Real-world Evidence (SURE) programme.

AIM: To investigate, through post hoc analysis of nine studies from the SemaglUtide Real-world Evidence (SURE) programme, the safety of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and in subpopulations in routine clinical practice, complementing findings from the phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) SUSTAIN programme. METHODS: The SURE studies had a duration of ~30 weeks and included adults with diagnosed T2D treated with OW semaglutide. Safety information, including hypoglycaemic events, were collected and analysed for the total study population and for patient subgroups based on baseline patient characteristics, baseline co-medication and prescriber specialty. RESULTS: Of the total 3505 patients, 24.3% reported adverse events (AEs), with most patients reporting non-serious (22.3%) and mild (17.1%) AEs. AEs mainly belonged to the gastrointestinal disorders system organ class (16.3% of patients). In total, 5.1% of patients reported AEs that led to treatment discontinuation, 0.5% reported serious adverse drug reactions and 0.2% had an AE with a fatal outcome, reported as unrelated to treatment. Overall, 1.1% and 0.1% of patients reported level 2 and 3 hypoglycaemic events, respectively. A higher rate of level 2 hypoglycaemia was observed in patients with baseline microvascular complications treated with insulin versus those on insulin without these complications. CONCLUSIONS: Safety data reported in the real-world SURE studies were generally consistent with observations in phase 3 OW semaglutide RCTs. No new safety concerns were identified, highlighting that OW semaglutide is well tolerated by adults with T2D and in subpopulations in routine clinical practice.

Therapeutic Advances in Obesity: How Real-World Evidence Impacts Affordability Beyond Standard of Care.

Obesity is currently considered a global epidemic, with rising prevalence worldwide and rather pessimistic projections. Based on its close interconnection with various co-morbidities, such as diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease, obesity is associated with significant increases in morbidity and mortality, while it also poses a substantial economic burden for national healthcare systems. Apparently, the majority of individuals classified as obese do not achieve adequate weight loss with the adoption of a healthy lifestyle intervention, including dietary modification and physical activity. Fortunately, during the last decade, a significant progress in pharmacotherapy of obesity has been observed, with the introduction of agents that have gained approval from regulatory authorities, namely semaglutide, liraglutide and tirzepatide, due to their impressive results in body weight reduction, alongside their beneficial, pleiotropic effects. The aim of the present review article is to discuss on evidence retrieved from real-world studies regarding the efficacy of those agents in obesity treatment, with emphasis on cost-effectiveness data, towards an effort to tackle efficiently the progression of obesity epidemic.

Safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with weight regain or insufficient weight loss after metabolic bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Weight regain and insufficient weight loss are major challenges after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS), affecting patients' comorbidities and quality of life. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in patients with weight regain or insufficient weight loss after MBS. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to find the relevant studies. RESULTS: A total of 19 articles were included. The highest doses of liraglutide and semaglutide were 3 mg per day and 1 mg once weekly, respectively, in the included studies. The mean differences in weight and body mass index after treatment were -7.02 kg or 3.07 kg/m2, -8.65 or -5.22 kg/m2, and -6.99 kg or -3.09 kg/m2 for treatment durations of ≤ 6 months, 6-12 months, and >12 months with liraglutide, respectively. Additionally, weekly semaglutide showed significantly greater weight loss compared to daily liraglutide, with a mean difference of 4.15 kg. Common complications included nausea (19.1%), constipation (8.6%), abdominal pain (3.7%), and vomiting (2.4%). CONCLUSION: Using GLP-1 RA is a safe and effective treatment for weight regain and insufficient weight loss after MBS.

Efficacy and Safety of Escalating the Dose of Oral Semaglutide from 7 to 14 mg: A Single-Center, Retrospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide, the first glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist available in tablet form for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, were established in the phase 3a PIONEER program. However, evidence regarding the titration of oral semaglutide in real-world clinical settings remains insufficient. This study aimed to elucidate the therapeutic advantages of escalating the dose of oral semaglutide from 7 to 14 mg through clinical data analysis. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a single center in Japan, focusing on adults with type 2 diabetes who were initiated on 14 mg oral semaglutide. The primary endpoint was the alteration in HbA1c levels 24 weeks after the initial prescription of 14 mg oral semaglutide. Secondary endpoints included changes in metabolic parameters and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Data from 66 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The mean change in HbA1c levels from baseline to 24 weeks following dose escalation was - 0.5 ± 0.8% [from 7.4 ± 1.0% at baseline to 7.0 ± 0.9% at 24 weeks (p < 0.01)]. Moreover, a significant reduction in body weight of - 2.0 ± 4.4 kg was observed at 24 weeks [from 90.0 ± 20.5 kg at baseline to 88.2 ± 21.4 kg at 24 weeks (p < 0.01)], with 41% of patients achieving at least a 3% reduction compared to baseline. Gastrointestinal disorders emerged as the most prevalent adverse event (10.6%), particularly nausea (7.6%), although predominantly of mild or moderate severity, with no instances of serious adverse events necessitating drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Escalating the dose of oral semaglutide to 14 mg could be an effective approach for enhancing glycemic control and managing body weight in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Effects of semaglutide on gut microbiota, cognitive function and inflammation in obese mice.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the effects of semaglutide on gut microbiota, cognitive function, and inflammation in obese mice. Method: Twenty-four C57BL/6J male mice were randomly assigned to three groups: a normal-chow diet group (NCD, n = 8), high-fat diet group (HFD, n = 8), and HFD+semaglutide group (Sema, n = 8). The mice were fed a HFD to establish an animal model of obesity and then administered with semaglutide or saline for 12 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed using the Morris water maze test. Serum pro-inflammatory cytokines were measured. 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was used to explore gut microbiota characteristics in obese mice. Result: Obese mice showed significant cognitive impairment and inflammation. Semaglutide improved cognitive function and attenuated inflammation induced by a HFD diet. The abundance of gut microbiota was significantly changed in the HFD group, including decreased Akkermansia, Muribaculaceae, Coriobacteriaceae_UCG_002, Clostridia_UCG_014 and increased Romboutsia, Dubosiella, Enterorhabdus. Whereas semaglutide could dramatically reverse the relative abundance of these gut microbiota. Correlation analysis suggested that cognitive function was positively correlated with Muribaculaceae and Clostridia_UCG_014, and negatively associated with Romboutsia and Dubosiella. Romboutsia was positively correlated with TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1ß. While Clostridia_UCG_014 was negatively related to TNFα, IL-6 and IL-1ß. Conclusions: For the first time semaglutide displayed different regulatory effects on HFD-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis. Semaglutide could regulate the structure and composition of gut microbiota associated with cognitive function and inflammation. Thus, affecting gut microbiota might be a potential mechanism of semaglutide in attenuating cognitive function and inflammation.

Semaglutide in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Outcomes of Semaglutide in Heart Failure Patients.

Heart failure (HF) stands as a formidable challenge in global healthcare casting a long shadow over both morbidity and mortality. A significant interplay between HF and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) manifests an elevated risk of adverse cardiovascular events in T2DM patients. Glucagon-like peptide 1 emerges as a pivotal player in T2DM, which is released in response to meals rich in glucose and lipids. We aim to assess the outcomes of using semaglutide in HF. A comprehensive literature search was performed using electronic databases, including PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, covering all records up to May 10, 2024. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were selected. Qualitative analysis was conducted to analyze the findings of the studies included. Four studies (three randomized controlled trials and one observational study) were included in our manuscript. There was a significant decrease in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (p< 0.001), body weight (p< 0.001), six-minute walk distance (p< 0.001), and CRP levels (p< 0.001). A statistically significant decrease in overall major adverse cardiac events was observed with a hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI 0.62, 0.92). Other factors and adverse effects were also discussed in our manuscript. Our study showed that semaglutide resulted in improvement in HF patients. Although adverse effects were observed, they were not as significant as the placebo itself.

Real-World Evaluation of Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Spain (SEMA-RW Study).

Although, in randomized clinical trials, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (OW s.c.) has demonstrated superior efficacy in comparison with placebo and active controls in terms of glycemic control and body weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), these results need to be confirmed in a real-world (RW) setting. An RW ambispective study (6 months retrospective and 6 months prospective) was conducted in 10 tertiary hospitals in Spain. We evaluated changes in HbA1c and body weight in patients with T2DM treated with semaglutide OW s.c. Additionally, we analyzed different subgroups of patients treated with semaglutide OW s.c. as an add-on to glucose-lowering therapy. A total of 752 patients with a mean age of 60.2 years, a mean HbA1c level of 8.5%, a mean body weight of 101.6 kg, and a mean T2DM duration of 10 years were included. At 12 months, compared with baseline, there was a mean difference of -2.1% in HbA1c levels (p < 0.001) and a mean difference of 9.2 kg in body weight (p < 0.001). Moreover, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between baseline and month 12 in both HbA1c and body weight in the four subgroups receiving semaglutide OW s.c. as an add-on to glucose-lowering therapy. Semaglutide OW s.c. was well tolerated, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most commonly reported side effects. In this RW study, 12 months of treatment with semaglutide OW s.c. in patients with T2DM was associated with significant and clinically relevant improvements in glycemic control and weight loss, regardless of the glucose-lowering therapy received, and the overall safety profile was positive.