RESUMO
The current study proposes an efficient strategy for exploiting the statistical power of cardiac atlases to investigate whether clinically significant variations in ventricular shape are sufficient to explain corresponding differences in ventricular wall motion directly, or if they are indirect markers of altered myocardial mechanical properties. This study was conducted in a cohort of patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) that face long-term right ventricular (RV) and/or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction as a consequence of adverse remodeling. Features of biventricular end-diastolic (ED) shape associated with RV apical dilation, LV dilation, RV basal bulging, and LV conicity correlated with components of systolic wall motion (SWM) that contribute most to differences in global systolic function. A finite element analysis of systolic biventricular mechanics was employed to assess the effect of perturbations in these ED shape modes on corresponding components of SWM. Perturbations to ED shape modes and myocardial contractility explained observed variation in SWM to varying degrees. In some cases, shape markers were partial determinants of systolic function and, in other cases, they were indirect markers for altered myocardial mechanical properties. Patients with rTOF may benefit from an atlas-based analysis of biventricular mechanics to improve prognosis and gain mechanistic insight into underlying myocardial pathophysiology.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative programming in deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy for movement disorders can be challenging and time consuming. Providing the neurologist with tools to visualize the electrode location relative to the patient's anatomy along with models of tissue activation and statistical data can therefore be very helpful. In this study, we evaluate the consistency between neurologists in interpreting and using such information provided by our DBS programming assistance software. METHODS: Five neurologists experienced in DBS programming were each given a dataset of 29 leads implanted in 17 patients. For each patient, probabilistic maps of stimulation response, anatomical images, models of tissue activation volumes, and electrode positions were presented inside a software framework called CRAnialVault Explorer (CRAVE) developed in house. Consistency between neurologists in optimal contact selection using the software was measured. RESULTS: With only the efficacy map, the average consistency among the five neurologists with respect to the mode and mean of their selections was 97% and 95%, respectively, while these numbers were 93% and 89%, respectively, when both efficacy and an adverse effect map were used simultaneously. Fleiss' kappa statistic also showed very strong agreement among the neurologists (0.87 when using one map and 0.72 when using two maps). CONCLUSION: Our five neurologists demonstrated high consistency in interpreting information provided by the CRAVE interactive visualization software for DBS postoperative programming assistance. Three of our five neurologists had no prior experience with the software, which suggests that the software has a short learning curve and contact selection is not dependent on familiarity with the program tools.