Metastasectomy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer With Liver and Lung Oligometastases: A Case Report of Complete Remission in a 96-Year-Old Patient.

We report a rare case of an extremely old colorectal cancer (CRC) patient who had complete remission after liver metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to lung oligometastases (OM), with good quality of life and no evidence of recurrence 12 years after the initial diagnosis. An 83-year-old male patient had a right hemicolectomy for stage pT3 pN0 adenocarcinoma of the colon. Soon he was found to have liver metastasis treated with radiofrequency ablation and then liver metastasectomy with clear margins, followed by chemotherapy in the form of FOLFIRI for six months. Six years later, positron emission tomography (PET) showed 1.6 cm OM in the left upper lobe lung. He was not considered a good candidate for surgery. We offered him SBRT 48 Gy in four fractions every other day. The lesion disappeared with no recurrence in the same location on PET and serial computed tomography (CT) scans. Three years later, PET-CT found a new OM in the left lingular lung measuring 1.2 cm. A CT-guided lung biopsy confirmed invasive adenocarcinoma favoring OM from the CRC. SBRT planning failed due to its proximity to the heart. He accepted the longer course of conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy at 60 Gy in 15 fractions with daily cone-beam CT guidance. Again, he tolerated treatment very well with no significant side effects, despite his age. He did not require any chemotherapy or other systemic treatment in the last 11 years, so he did not experience any toxicities related to such treatment. This case is important to show that old age alone should not be considered a contraindication for metastasectomy and SBRT for CRC with liver and lung OM.

Applying PET-CT for predicting the efficacy of SBRT to inoperable early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: A Brazilian case-series.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for early-stage inoperable primary lung cancer. Here we report a thorough description of the prognostic value of pre-SBRT SUVmax for predicting the efficacy of SBRT in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: This is a retrospective study of consecutive cases of early-stage inoperable lung adenocarcinoma, staged with PET-CT, treated with SBRT between 2007 and 17. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to assess overall survival and compare time to event between those with PET-CT SUVmax values ≤ 5.0 and those > 5. Fisher's Exact tests and the Mann-Whitney U were used to compare the patient and clinical data of those with SUVmax≤5.0 and >5.0, and those with and without any failure. Findings: Amongst 50 lung carcinoma lesions, from 47 patients (34 (68%)-T1a or 5 (p = 0.112). In addition, 5 experienced a regional failure and 4 a distant failure. Higher PET-CT SUVmax values before SBRT were associated with an increased risk of any failure (36% versus 0%, p = 0.0040 on Fisher's Exact test) and faster time to event (p = 0.010, log rank test). Both acute and late toxicities profile were acceptable. Interpretation: Patients with early-stage inoperable lung adenocarcinoma present good clinical outcomes when treated with SBRT. We raised the hypothesis that the value of PET-CT SUVmax before SBRT may be an important predictive factor in disease control. Funding: None.

Oligo metastatic renal cell carcinoma: stereotactic body radiation therapy, if, when and how?

Background and purpose Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has traditionally been considered radioresistant with a limited role for conventional fractionation as a local approach. Nevertheless, since the appearance of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), radiotherapy (RT) has been increasingly employed in the management of metastatic RCC (mRCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of SBRT for synchronous and metachronous oligo metastatic RCC patients in terms of local control, delay of systemic treatment, overall survival and toxicity. Patients and methods A Monocentric single institution retrospective data collection was performed. Inclusion criteria were: (1) oligo-recurrent or oligo-progressive disease (less than 5 metastases) in mRCC patients after radical/partial nephrectomy or during systemic therapy, (2) metastasectomy or other metastasis-directed, rather than SBRT not feasible, (3) any contraindication to receive systemic therapy (such as comorbidities), (4) all the histologies were included, (5) available signed informed consent form for treatment. Tumor response and toxicity were evaluated using the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03, respectively. Progression-free survival in-field and out-field (in-field and out-field PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated via the Kaplan–Meier method. The drug treatment-free interval was calculated from the start of SBRT to the beginning of any systemic therapy. Results From 2010 to December 2018, 61 patients with extracranial and intracranial metastatic RCC underwent SBRT on 83 lesions. Intracranial and extracranial lesions were included. Forty-five (74%) patients were treated for a solitary metastatic lesion. Median RT dose was 25 Gy (range 10–52) in 5–10 fractions. With a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range 0–7.15), 1-year in-field PFS was 70%, 2-year in-field PFS was 55% (AU)

Oligo metastatic renal cell carcinoma: stereotactic body radiation therapy, if, when and how?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has traditionally been considered radioresistant with a limited role for conventional fractionation as a local approach. Nevertheless, since the appearance of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), radiotherapy (RT) has been increasingly employed in the management of metastatic RCC (mRCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of SBRT for synchronous and metachronous oligo metastatic RCC patients in terms of local control, delay of systemic treatment, overall survival and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Monocentric single institution retrospective data collection was performed. Inclusion criteria were: (1) oligo-recurrent or oligo-progressive disease (less than 5 metastases) in mRCC patients after radical/partial nephrectomy or during systemic therapy, (2) metastasectomy or other metastasis-directed, rather than SBRT not feasible, (3) any contraindication to receive systemic therapy (such as comorbidities), (4) all the histologies were included, (5) available signed informed consent form for treatment. Tumor response and toxicity were evaluated using the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03, respectively. Progression-free survival in-field and out-field (in-field and out-field PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method. The drug treatment-free interval was calculated from the start of SBRT to the beginning of any systemic therapy. RESULTS: From 2010 to December 2018, 61 patients with extracranial and intracranial metastatic RCC underwent SBRT on 83 lesions. Intracranial and extracranial lesions were included. Forty-five (74%) patients were treated for a solitary metastatic lesion. Median RT dose was 25 Gy (range 10-52) in 5-10 fractions. With a median follow-up of 2.3 years (range 0-7.15), 1-year in-field PFS was 70%, 2-year in-field PFS was 55%. One year out-field PFS was 39% and 1-year OS was 78%. Concomitant systemic therapy was employed for only 11 (18%) patients, for the others 50 (82%) the drug treatment-free rate was 70% and 50% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. No > G1 acute and late toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: The pattern of failure was pre-dominantly out-of-field, even if the population was negatively selected and the used RT dose could be considered palliative. Therefore, SBRT appears to be a well-tolerated, feasible and safe approach in oligo metastatic RCC patients with an excellent in-field PFS. SBRT might play a role in the management of selected RCC patients allowing for a delay systemic therapy begin (one out of two patients were free from new systemic therapy at 2 years after SBRT). Further research on SBRT dose escalation is warranted.

Quality control methods for linear accelerator radiation and mechanical axes alignment.

PURPOSE: The delivery accuracy of highly conformal dose distributions generated using intensity modulation and collimator, gantry, and couch degrees of freedom is directly affected by the quality of the alignment between the radiation beam and the mechanical axes of a linear accelerator. For this purpose, quality control (QC) guidelines recommend a tolerance of ±1 mm for the coincidence of the radiation and mechanical isocenters. Traditional QC methods for assessment of radiation and mechanical axes alignment (based on pointer alignment) are time consuming and complex tasks that provide limited accuracy. In this work, an automated test suite based on an analytical model of the linear accelerator motions was developed to streamline the QC of radiation and mechanical axes alignment. METHODS: The proposed method used the automated analysis of megavoltage images of two simple task-specific phantoms acquired at different linear accelerator settings to determine the coincidence of the radiation and mechanical isocenters. The sensitivity and accuracy of the test suite were validated by introducing actual misalignments on a linear accelerator between the radiation axis and the mechanical axes using both beam steering and mechanical adjustments of the gantry and couch. RESULTS: The validation demonstrated that the new QC method can detect sub-millimeter misalignment between the radiation axis and the three mechanical axes of rotation. A displacement of the radiation source of 0.2 mm using beam steering parameters was easily detectable with the proposed collimator rotation axis test. Mechanical misalignments of the gantry and couch rotation axes of the same magnitude (0.2 mm) were also detectable using the new gantry and couch rotation axis tests. For the couch rotation axis, the phantom and test design allow detection of both translational and tilt misalignments with the radiation beam axis. For the collimator rotation axis, the test can isolate the misalignment between the beam radiation axis and the mechanical collimator rotation axis from the impact of field size asymmetry. The test suite can be performed in a reasonable time (30-35 min) due to simple phantom setup, prescription-based beam delivery, and automated image analysis. As well, it provides a clear description of the relationship between axes. After testing the sensitivity of the test suite to beam steering and mechanical errors, the results of the test suite were used to reduce the misalignment errors of the linac to less than 0.7-mm radius for all axes. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed test suite offers sub-millimeter assessment of the coincidence of the radiation and mechanical isocenters and the test automation reduces complexity with improved efficiency. The test suite results can be used to optimize the linear accelerator's radiation to mechanical isocenter alignment by beam steering and mechanical adjustment of gantry and couch.