Correlation Between Vestibular Disorders and Superior Semicircular Dehiscence on High-resolution Computed Tomography at Tam Anh Ho Chi Minh General Hospital.

Objective: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a pathologic condition within the inner ear characterized by various vestibular manifestations. Numerous studies have reported an incidence rate of SSCD ranging from 3.6% to 9% in the general population. The objective of this medical study was to evaluate the prevalence of superior SSCD and investigate its correlation with vestibular symptoms among patients who underwent high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. To the best of our knowledge, there is limited research and awareness regarding SSCD in Vietnam. In addition, the secondary aim of our investigation is to assess the prevalence of SSCD in Vietnam and compare it with findings from previous studies worldwide. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Tam Anh Ho Chi Minh General Hospital from March 2022 to February 2024. Medical records and HRCT scans of the patients were collected. Patients were categorized into two groups: those with and without vestibular disorders. SSCD was defined as the absence of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal facing toward the dura of the middle cranial fossa. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the correlation between vestibular symptoms and the presence of SSCD. Results: A total of 362 patients (including 151 men and 211 women) were recruited. The prevalence of SSCD was 10.2% according to the HRCT scan results. The study found that 18.33% of patients with vestibular disorders had SSCD on HRCT scans, whereas only 6.2% of patients without vestibular disorders exhibited SSCD, indicating a significant association (p-value <0.001). Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of considering SSCD as a potential etiology in patients presenting with vestibular symptoms and emphasize the diagnostic utility of HRCT.

Minor's syndrome: Dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. A case report.

Superior semicircular canal (SSC) dehiscence syndrome, also known as Minor syndrome, is a rare condition characterized by vestibular and cochlear symptoms linked to a defect in the bony roof of the SSC. The prevalence is estimated at 0.5%, with a male predominance. Dehiscence may result from abnormal bone development, becoming symptomatic due to minimal trauma or pressure changes. Clinical presentation varies based on dehiscence size and location, with dizziness and oscillatory movements triggered by pressure changes or loud sounds being common symptoms. Other manifestations include conductive hearing loss due to the formation of a ``third window'' in the inner ear. Diagnosis typically involves computed tomography, distinguishing SSCDS from otosclerosis. Surgical treatment is reserved for cases of disabling vestibular pathology, often involving sealing the dehiscence through various approaches.

Lumbar Drain Use during Middle Fossa Approaches for Nonneoplastic Pathology of the Skull Base.

Introduction The middle fossa craniotomy (MFCs) is commonly utilized for spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, encephaloceles, and superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). This study compares postoperative outcomes of MFCs with and without LD use. Methods A retrospective cohort study of adults over the age of 18 years presenting for the repair of nonneoplastic CSF leak, encephalocele, or SSCD via MFC from 2009 to 2021 was conducted. The main exposure of interest was the placement of an LD. The primary outcome was the presence of postoperative complications (acute/delayed neurologic deficit, meningitis, intracranial hemorrhage, and stroke). Secondary outcomes included operating room (OR) time, length of stay, recurrence, and need for reoperation. Results In total, 172 patients were included, 96 of whom received an LD and 76 who did not. Patients not receiving an LD were more likely to receive intraoperative mannitol ( n = 24, 31.6% vs. n = 16, 16.7%, p = 0.02). On univariate logistic regression, LD placement did not influence overall postoperative complications (OR: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-2.02, p = 0.28), CSF leak recurrence (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.25-2.29, p = 0.61), or need for reoperation (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.48-4.96, p = 0.51). While OR time was shorter for patients not receiving LD (349 ± 71 vs. 372 ± 85 minutes), this difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.07). Conclusion No difference in postoperative outcomes was observed in patients who had an intraoperative LD placed compared to those without LD. Operative times were increased in the LD cohort, but this difference was not statistically significant. Given the similar outcomes, we conclude that LD is not necessary to facilitate safe MCF for nonneoplastic skull base pathologies.

Evaluation of clinical predictors of postoperative outcomes in tegmen defect patients with and without concurrent superior semicircular canal dehiscence and cerebrospinal fluid leak.

OBJECTIVES: Tegmen and superior semicircular canal defects have been well studied, yet the factors contributing to their onset and progression are widely debated. The clinical utility of intraoperative intracranial pressure measurements has yet to be tested. This report aims to use intraoperative opening pressure and concurrent superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) to analyze factors influencing disease course and clinical outcomes in patients with tegmen dehiscence. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 61 patients who underwent tegmen defect repair was performed. Multiple variables of interest including body mass index (BMI), presence of SSCD, presence of dural venous sinus stenosis, opening pressure, and acetazolamide therapy use were recorded. The cohort was divided into those with or without concurrent SSCD and those presenting with or without cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak for analysis. RESULTS: A linear relationship between opening pressure and BMI (p = 0.009) was noted; however, intraoperative opening pressure was not associated with disease outcome. Concurrent SSCD was present in 25 % of patients, while 62 % presented with CSF leak. The concurrent SSCD group exhibited higher opening pressure, higher likelihood of having dural sinus stenosis, and higher likelihood of being discharged on acetazolamide. The CSF leak group had higher likelihood of obstructive sleep apnea and persistent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing tegmen defect repair, concurrent SSCD suggests increased disease severity. The presence of preoperative CSF leak predicts persistent symptoms following repair. BMI is linearly correlated with intracranial pressure in these patients.

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence in relation with the superior petrosal sinus: our experience, surgical management and systematic review of literature.

PURPOSE: Most of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence (SSCD) are located in the apical region of the SSC. However, in a small number of cases, it may be situated in the medial wall, causing the SSC to contact with the superior petrosal sinus (SPS). The aim of this study is to describe four patients with SSCD involving the superior petrosal sinus (SSCD-SPS) and to perform a review of the literature. METHODS: Observational retrospective study of patients diagnosed of SSCD-SPS in a tertiary referral center. A systematic review was made, identifying 7 articles in the literature. Clinical presentation, complementary test (pure-tone audiometry, PTA; vestibular evoked myogenic potential, VEMP; computed tomography, CT), therapeutic management and outcomes were reported. RESULTS: Four new cases of SSCD-SPS are reported, in three of them a transmastoid plugging was performed. 54 patients with SSCD-SPS (57 dehiscences) were reported in the literature. The most frequent symptoms were aural pressure (57.41%) and vertigo provoked by pressure/Valsalva (55.55%). Conductive hearing loss was the most common finding in PTA (47.37%). Abnormally low thresholds were observed in 59.46% of reported VEMP. Transmastoid approach was used in ten cases, middle fossa approach in four, round window reinforcement in one, and occlusion of the SPS using coils in two. CONCLUSIONS: Within SSCD, we have encountered a rare subtype characterized by its medial wall location in close proximity to the SPS. This subgroup needs special consideration as it has shown its own distinct characteristics. Regarding therapeutic management, we advocate a transmastoid approach.

Comparing Approaches for Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

OBJECTIVE: Compare outcomes for subjects who underwent middle cranial fossa (MCF) or transmastoid (TM) repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Quaternary-care, academic neurotology practice. METHODS: Subjects who underwent MCF or TM repair of SSCD between December 1999 and April 2023 were identified. Main outcome measures included demographic data, length of surgery and hospital stay, clinical presentation, and audiometric testing. RESULTS: Ninety-three subjects (97 ears) who underwent surgery for SSCD met inclusion criteria: 58.8% (57) via MCF, 39.2% (38) via TM, and 2.0% (2) via TM + MCF. Median operative time was shorter for the TM (35) compared to the MCF (29) approach (118 vs 151 minutes, P < .001). Additionally, median hospital stays were shorter for TM (36) compared to the MCF (56) approach (15.3 vs 67.7 hours, P < .001). Overall, 92% (49/53) of MCF and 92% (33/36) of TM surgeries resulted in an improvement or resolution of one or more symptoms (P = .84). There was no significant preoperative to postoperative change in the median air conduction pure-tone average (PTA), air-bone gap, or word recognition score in both the MCF and TM groups (P > .05). Improvements of >10 dB in the pre- to postoperative absolute change in bone conduction PTA were noted in 3 subjects in the MCF group and 4 subjects in the TM group (P = .49). CONCLUSION: The TM approach for SSCD demonstrates shorter operative times and length of hospital stay. The TM and MCF approaches have comparable audiometric and clinical outcomes.

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence postoperative outcomes: a case series of 350 repairs.

BACKGROUND: Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence (SSCD) is a dehiscence of the otic capsule which normally lies over the superior semicircular canal. This database constitutes the largest series of SSCD patients to date. OBJECTIVE: To determine what preoperative factors, if any, contribute to postoperative outcomes and evaluate symptom resolution in a large SSCD patient cohort. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective chart review collected patient demographics, intraoperative findings, and pre-and postoperative symptoms. Fisher's exact t-test was performed for unpaired categorical variables, with a significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: 350 SSCD repairs were performed. The median age was 52 years (range: 17-86 years, ± 6.4 years), and the median follow-up duration was 4.6 months (range: 0.03-59.5 months, ± 6.8 months). Preoperative hearing loss was significantly associated with female sex (p = 0.0028). The most reported preoperative symptoms were tinnitus (77.4%), dizziness (74.0%), autophony (66.3%), amplification (63.7%), and disequilibrium (62.6%). Between patients who received unilateral versus bilateral SSCD repair, the greatest postoperative symptomatic resolution was seen in autophony (74.9%, p < 0.001), amplification (77.3%, p = 0.00027), hyperacusis (77.4%, p = 0.023), hearing (62.9%, p = 0.0063), and dizziness (54.6%, p < 0.001) for patients with unilateral SSCD repair. CONCLUSION: Surgical repair via the middle cranial fossa approach can significantly resolve auditory, vestibular, and neurological symptoms of patients with SSCD. Although this is one of the largest single-institution SSCD studies to date, future multi-institutional, prospective studies would be beneficial to validate these results.

Impact of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on cochlear implant audiologic outcomes.

PURPOSE: Determine whether adult cochlear implant users with radiographic superior semicircular canal dehiscence experience clinically significant differences in audiological outcomes when compared to cochlear implant users with normal temporal bone anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, single institution review. Adult, post-lingual deaf patients implanted between 2010 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included age 18 years or older, available preoperative computed tomography imaging, and preoperative and postoperative AzBio audiological data for at least 6 months of cochlear implant use. Preoperative and postoperative AzBio Sentence Test scores were compared between patients with normal temporal bone anatomy and those with radiographic superior semicircular canal dehiscence or near dehiscence. RESULTS: 110 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean AzBio score for normal temporal bone anatomy group improved from 35.2 % (SD 28.2) preoperatively to 70.3 % (SD 25.7) postoperatively, an improvement of 35.1 % (SD 28.6). Mean AzBio score for near dehiscent temporal bone anatomy group improved from 26.6 % (SD 28.9) preoperatively to 64.5 % (SD 30.6) postoperatively, an improvement of 37.9 % (SD 27.9). Mean AzBio score for dehiscent temporal bone anatomy group improved from 26.3 % (SD 20.4) preoperatively to 65.1 % (SD 27.6) postoperatively, an improvement of 38.7 % (SD 26.9). Utilizing the one-way analysis of variance test, there was no significant difference in audiologic outcomes between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with complete or near complete radiographic superior canal dehiscence at the time of cochlear implantation achieve similar improvements in speech perception scores compared to normal anatomy adult cochlear implant users.

Diagnostic Yield of Patients Undergoing Evaluation of Possible Superior Canal Dehiscence.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the diagnostic yield of patients undergoing evaluation for superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS), and identify alternative conditions diagnosed in patients suspected of, but not ultimately diagnosed with, SCDS. METHODS: Diagnostically undifferentiated adult patients suspected of having SCDS were identified between 2016 and 2021 at a tertiary academic medical system. Patients were categorized by diagnostic testing, radiographic superior semicircular canal (SSC) abnormality, symptoms, evaluating clinician specialty, operative intervention, and diagnosis. Differences among groups were assessed for statistical significance. RESULTS: Of 1242 candidate patients, 477 met inclusion criteria-evaluation by a clinician with SCDS on their differential diagnosis prior to diagnostic imaging. The mean (SD) age was 53.0 (15.0) years and 70.6% were female. A total of 364 patients underwent subsequent diagnostic imaging, and among these, 164 (45.1%) had a radiographic SSC abnormality with 99 (27.2%) receiving a diagnosis of SCDS (two cases of "near dehiscence syndrome"). One third (33.3%) of patients with SCDS underwent operative repair. Most clinicians with the initial suspicion for SCDS were otolaryngologists (90.6%), who had greater diagnostic yield than clinicians from other specialties (22.2% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.012). Patients not diagnosed with SCDS alternatively received 21 unique diagnoses and 52.1% (138/265) were not definitively diagnosed with any condition. CONCLUSIONS: This study characterizes the diagnostic incidence, or yield, of newly identified radiographic SSC abnormalities (45.1%) and SCDS (27.2%) among people suspected of having SCDS. Considerable overlap in presentation between SCDS and other conditions exists, and there is need for improvement in efficiently diagnosing patients with SCDS and audio-vestibular complaints in general. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Laryngoscope, 134:4095-4100, 2024.

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a radiological and clinical study.

Aim: to assess radiologically the prevalence of SSCD with its clinical presentations and its relationship with age. Methods: a prospective cohort study carried out on 200 consecutive patients (400 temporal bones). Radiological evaluation was performed using High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) with measurement of thickness of bone covering superior semicircular canal (SCC), height and diameter of SSC. Results: Two hundred patients (400 temporal bones) were involved. The mean thickness ± SD, the mean diameter ± SD and the mean height ± SD were 1.38 ± 0.80 mm, 0.94 ± 0.26 mm and 10.91 ± 2.39 mm respectively. The prevalence of SSCD and predehiscence were 1% and 14% respectively. The commonest symptom encountered was autophony (48.3%). When the SSC thickness, diameter and height were compared with the age of patients, statistically significant differences were detected. The highest diameter, lowest height and lowest thickness were found in patients aged from 54 to 72 years. Thickness of bony layer covering SSC was found to be the most validated measurement for differentiation between cases with positive and negative symptoms with the highest sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: The prevalence of SSCD and predehiscence varied among the studies. Autophony is the commonest symptom usually encountered. The condition is acquired rather than congenital. The thickness of bone covering SCC is the most validated measurement in differentiation between cases with positive and negative symptoms.

The History of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence: A Bibliometric Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment and understanding of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) has seen significant developments over the past 25 years. Bibliographic analysis can provide insight into the evolution of research as well as highlight emerging areas. Reviewing a large volume of publications provides valuable insights into the citation patterns and collaborations of research groups. This study seeks to offer a comprehensive historical overview of SSCD and leading authors. DATABASE REVIEWED: Web of Science Core Collection. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis of the current literature on SSCD was conducted. A performance analysis and science mapping of the top 100 most cited articles was completed using a citation analysis. Two independent reviewers evaluated articles for relevance and adjugated by a third reviewer. Author and institution networks were examined. RESULTS: Seven hundred ninety-one articles on the topic of SSCD were identified. The top 100 articles spanned over 23 years from 1998 to 2019 and were published in 30 different journals. The top 100 articles were cited 8253 times in literature. The document contents revealed 233 keywords and 238 author keywords. The articles were authored by a total of 291 authors, with only 4 single-authored documents. CONCLUSIONS: SSCD has been highly researched in aspects of symptomatology, diagnosis, and treatment, as indicated by many highly cited articles that relate. However, the production of highly cited articles on SSCD displays a significant decrease after 2013, with only 17 of the top cited articles published since then.

The importance of bone density and anatomical structure in superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the importance of bone density, surface area, and diameter of anatomical structures of the superior semicircular canal (SSC), lateral semicircular canal (LSC), posterior semicircular canal (PSC), utricle, and saccule in patients diagnosed with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bone density, surface area, and diameter of SSC, LSC, PSC, utricle, and saccule were measured and compared between the SSCD group and control group. Fifteen ears in the SSCD group and 60 ears in the control group were evaluated. Additionally, within the SSCD group, the dehiscent and healthy sides were evaluated independently. RESULTS: SSC's bone density was significantly lower in the SSCD group compared to the control group (p = 0.008). No significant differences were found in surface area and diameter between the groups (p > 0.05). While most of the anatomical structures showed no significant difference in bone density between dehiscent and healthy ears (p > 0.05), SSC bone density was significantly lower in affected ears (p = 0.000) in SSCD group. CONCLUSION: Based on the data obtained in this study, bone density and anatomical structure may be useful in patients diagnosed with SSCD.

Third window lesions of the inner ear: A pictorial review.

PURPOSE: Radiographic review of pathologies that associate with third window syndrome. METHODS: Case series and literature review. RESULTS: Eight unique third window conditions are described and illustrated, including superior, lateral, and posterior semicircular canal dehiscence; carotid-cochlear, facial-cochlear, and internal auditory canal-cochlear dehiscence, labyrinthine erosion from endolymphatic sac tumor, and enlarged vestibular aqueduct. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the characteristic imaging features and symptoms to differentiate third window pathologies for expedient diagnosis and management planning.

Electrocochleography in the diagnosis of third window conditions.

Introduction: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is the best-known and most common presentation of so-called "third window conditions." There are a variety of diagnostic measures and tests for this condition in the current literature, including air-bone gap, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, and electrocochleography (EcochG). The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic utility of EcochG and its relationship to air-bone gap in a cohort of patients with confirmed SSCD. Methods: We reviewed data from 20 patients (11 female and 9 male subjects, age ranging 21-78 years), with confirmed unilateral or bilateral superior canal dehiscence. In total, 11 patients had unilateral SSCD and 9 patients had bilateral SSCD as determined by high-resolution CT scan. This resulted in the inclusion of twenty-nine ears with superior canal dehiscence and 11 normal ears. Results: Our results indicated that all confirmed SSCD ears presented with an abnormal EcochG SP/AP value and that there was a statistically significant difference between normal and dehiscent ears. There was no statistically significant relationship between air-bone gap and SP/AP ratio in the ears diagnosed with SSCD nor was there a significant difference between dehiscent and normal ears in terms of air-bone gap at three frequencies. Discussion: These results are consistent with previous studies showing the diagnostic utility of EcochG for this condition and the variability of air-bone gap. While an unexpected air-bone gap continues to be a red flag for SSCD, its absence along with the presence of subjective symptoms is a reasonable indicator for further clinical investigation to include EcochG.

Cochlear electrode array misplacement into the superior semicircular canal: a case report and literature review / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

Electrode array misplacement is a rare complication of cochlear implant. This article reports an 11-year-old boy who was mistakenly implanted the cochlear electrode array into the superior semicircular canal during the initial cochlear implant. After the diagnosis was confirmed, he underwent a second cochlear implant and the electrode array were successfully implanted into the cochlea. This article conducted a systematic review of the literature on electrode array misplacement, and the causes of electrode array misplacement were analyzed from different implantation position.

Dehiscencia del canal semicircular superior: análisis de la producción científica / Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: analysis of scientific production

RESUMEN Introducción: La dehiscencia del canal semicircular es una vestibulopatía periférica rara y poco prevalente, que se caracteriza por una falta de cobertura ósea del canal semicircular superior en la zona más próxima a la duramadre de la fosa cerebral media. Objetivo: Conocer el estado actual y la calidad científica de las publicaciones sobre la dehiscencia del canal semicircular superior (DCSS). Material y método: Se ha realizado una búsqueda bibliométrica con posterior revisión, selección y análisis a partir de ítems relacionados con estudios DCSS en la base de datos Pubmed desde el año 1998 hasta 2017. Resultados: Al estudiar el tipo de publicaciones, el 77% eran artículos originales, 12% revisiones, 9% casos clínicos, 2% cartas al director y respuestas al editor. Los artículos han sido publicados en un total de 108 revistas, siendo Otology and Neurotology la que mayor número de manuscritos presenta con un total de 87, seguida de Head and Neck Surgery con 28 y Laryngoscope con 22. Estados Unidos se posiciona como el principal contribuyente a la literatura mundial sobre este tema (42%), seguido de Europa (33%). El idioma de referencia es el inglés con 91% de publicaciones (382). Según el índice de Lotka, la actividad productiva de los autores es de tipo medio/bajo, ya que de los 217 autores que firman en primer lugar, solo 19 tienen más de 10 artículos. Según el índice de impacto Journal Citation Reports, 60% de las publicaciones se localiza en los cuartiles Q1 (116 publicaciones) y Q2 (141 publicaciones), lo que indica que la calidad de los trabajos es alta. La temática ha ido variando con el paso del tiempo, siendo actualmente el diagnóstico con 34,3%, seguido del tratamiento con 25,7%, los temas que más interesan. Aunque se trata principalmente de un tema del campo de la otorrinolaringología, en los últimos años ha despertado interés en otras áreas como la neurología y la radiología. Conclusión: Este estudio revela como los trabajos sobre DCSS presentan un escaso número de autores, las publicaciones se concentran en pocas revistas, pero de una alta calidad, y el estado actual del tema está en fase de crecimiento exponencial.

ABSTRACT Introduction: The dehiscence of the semicircular canal is a rare and not very prevalent peripheral vestibulopathy, characterized by a lack of bony coverage of the superior semicircular canal in the area closest to the dura of the middle cerebral fossa. Aim: To know current status and scientific quality of publications of the superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). Material and method: Bibliometric research with review, selection and analysis from ítems related with SSCD studies in the Pubmed database from 1998 to 2017. Results: 77% of publications were original articles, 12% reviews, 9% clinical cases, 2% letters and answers to the editor. The articles have been published in 108 journals. The top publishing journal is Otology and Neurotology with 87 publications, followed by Head and Neck Surgery with 28 and Laryngoscope with 22. USA is the main global contributor to the world literature on this subject (42%) followed by Europe (33%). The publication reference language is English, with the 91% of publications (382). According to Lotka's index, the general production activity of the authors is at the middle/low level. According to JCR impact factor, there are 60% of the publications in Q1 (116 articles) and Q2 (141 articles) quartiles, which indicates that the quality is high. The subject of the publications has varied over time, being currently diagnostic with 34.3%, followed by treatment with 25.7%, the subjects that most interest. In recent years it has aroused interest in other areas such as neurology or radiology. Conclusion: The work on DCSS has a small number of authors, the publications are limited to a few journals, but of a high quality, and the current state of the subject is in phase of exponential growth.

Dehiscencia del canal semicircular superior como causa de tinnitus pulsátil / Superior semicircular canal dehiscence as cause of pulsatile tinnitus

RESUMEN El tinnitus se presenta en forma crónica en alrededor del 10% de los adultos, siendo el 4% de estos casos tinnitus pulsátil (TP). El TP se caracteriza por ser rítmico y sincrónico al latido cardiaco. Existen múltiples causas descritas, pero en un grupo importante de casos, no se logra objetivar su origen. Nuestro objetivo es presentar casos de dehiscencia del canal semicircular superior (DCSS) como causa de tinnitus pulsátil y su estudio. Se presentan dos pacientes evaluadas por tinnitus pulsátil. En ambos casos se descartan causas sistémicas, ECO doppler carotídeo sin alteración, angio TAC y RNM sin hallazgos. En reconstrucción de Pöschl se sospecha DCSS, por lo que se estudia con potenciales miogénicos evocados cVEMP y oVEMP con disminución de umbral y respuesta aumentada en oído afectado. En los casos expuestos el tinnitus aparece como síntoma único asociado a la presencia de DCSS, que fue confirmada con estudio imagenológico y VEMPs. El estudio con angio TAC permite pesquisar diversas causas asociadas. Los VEMPs confirman el diagnóstico, teniendo el oVEMP mayor sensibilidad. Como conclusión la DCSS es una entidad a tener presente como diagnóstico diferencial del tinnitus pulsátil y ante su sospecha se debe explorar con VEMPs.

ABSTRACT Tinnitus occurs chronically in about 10% of adults, being pulsatile tinnitus a 4% of these cases (TP). TP is characterized by being rythmic and sychronous to the heart beat. There are many described causes, but in a significant group of cases it is not possible to determine its origin. Our aim is present clinical cases of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) as the cause of pulsatile tinnitus and its study. Clinical cases: Two patients present pulsatile tinnitus in her right ear. System causes were discarded, normal Carotid Doppler ultrasonography, Anglo CT scan and MRI without findings. In Pöschl reconstruction SSCD can be observed. Evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) by suspicion of SSCD Syndrome, cVEMP and oVEMP with a elevated amplitudes and lower thresholds ipsilateral response. In the cases exposed, tinnitus appears as a single symptom associated with the presence of SSCD which was confirmed with imaging studies and VEMPs. The AngioTAC allows to investigate several associated causes. The VEMPs confirm the diagnosis, with oVEMP having a greater sensitivity. The SSCD is an entity to have in my mind as a differential diagnosis of pulsatile tinnitus and, if suspected, should be explored with VEMPs.

Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome - Diagnosis and Surgical Management

Abstract Introduction Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome was described by Minor et al in 1998. It is a troublesome syndrome that results in vertigo and oscillopsia induced by loud sounds or changes in the pressure of the external auditory canal or middle ear. Patients may present with autophony, hyperacusis, pulsatile tinnitus and hearing loss. When symptoms are mild, they are usually managed conservatively, but surgical intervention may be needed for patients with debilitating symptoms. Objective The aim of this manuscript is to review the different surgical techniques used to repair the superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Data Sources PubMed and Ovid-SP databases. Data Synthesis The different approaches are described and discussed, as well as their limitations.We also review the advantages and disadvantages of the plugging, capping and resurfacing techniques to repair the dehiscence. Conclusions Each of the surgical approaches has advantages and disadvantages. The middle fossa approach gives a better view of the dehiscence, but comes with a higher morbidity than the transmastoid approach. Endoscopic assistance may be advantageous during the middle cranial fossa approach for better visualization. The plugging and capping techniques are associated with higher success rates than resurfacing, with no added risk of hearing loss.

Síndrome de dehiscencia del canal semicircular superior: a propósito de un caso / Canal dehiscence syndrome of the superior semicircular: in a case purpose

El síndrome de dehiscencia de canal semicircular superior (DCSS) es una patología descrita en 1998 por Minor y cols, presenta síntomas diversos incluido vértigo inducido por el sonido, hipoacusia y autofonía por la falta de cobertura ósea en dicho canal. El diagnóstico se basa en la clínica y la confirmación se obtiene mediante la tomografía computarizada de peñasco. El tratamiento será expectante o reparación quirúrgica de la continuidad si la clínica es incapacitante. En este artículo se presenta un caso clínico de DCSS con síntomas auditivos y vestibulares al emitir el fonema "mmm".

The superior semicircular dehiscence síndrome is a pathology described en 1998 by Minor et al. Which presents several symptoms incluid sound induced vértigo, hearing loss and autophony due to bone dehiscense of this semicircular canal. The diagnosis was based on clinical and confirmation is given by the temporal bone CT. Treatment is expectant or surgical repair of continuity if the clinic is disabling. In this paper we present a case of DCSS with auditory and vestibular symptoms in issuing the phoneme "mmm".