Surgical abortion service reorganization in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a unique experience of attending second trimester D&E procedures under spinal anesthesia as emergency procedures.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic created a massive shift in how health care systems interact with COVID testing for patients. To avoid delay in accessing second trimester surgical abortion at our hospital (St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College) during this pandemic, dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedures were attended as emergency cases, instead of as elective surgical procedures, which then required adherence to the universal preoperative COVID-19 testing protocol. This study aimed at documenting the experience of this unique abortion service adjustment in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive study conducted at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from April 1, 2021 to July 31, 2021. We reviewed second trimester surgical abortion cases managed with D& E procedures, performed under spinal anesthesia using the emergency COVID-19 pre-operative testing protocol. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23 and simple descriptive statistics were applied. Percentages and proportions were used to present the results. Results: Nineteen cases of second trimester D&E cases were reviewed. The median gestational age of the abortion clients was 21.57 weeks. Eight of 19 cases had cervical preparation with overnight intra-cervical Foley catheter placement while the rest 11 (57.9%) cases had their cervical preparation with Laminaria. The median time interval from initial evaluation of the abortion client to time of doing D& E procedure was 21.83 h. Conclusion: Surgical abortion service reorganization enabled abortion clients to access dilation and evacuation procedures within 24 h of their initial presentation. This prevented significant delays in accessing abortion care that could otherwise have occurred as a result of adhering to the preoperative COVID-19 testing protocols applied to elective surgeries.

The provision of abortion in Australia: service delivery as a bioethical concern.

Despite significant progress in the legalization and decriminalization of abortion in Australia over the past decade or more recent research and government reports have made it clear that problems with the provision of services remain. This essay examines such issues and sets forth the view that such issues can and should be seen as (bio)ethical concerns. Whilst conscientious objection-the right to opt-out of provision on the basis of clear ethical reservations-is a legally and morally permissible stance that healthcare professionals can adopt, this does not mean those working in healthcare can simply elect not to be providers absent a clear ethical rationale. Furthermore, simple non-provision would seem to contravene the basic tenants of medical professionalism as well as the oft raised claims of the healthcare professions to put the needs of patients first. Recognizing that much of the progress that has been made over the past three decades can be attributed to the efforts of dedicated healthcare professionals who have dedicated their careers to meeting the profession's collective responsibilities in this area of women's health and reproductive healthcare, this paper frames the matter as a collective ethical lapse on the part of healthcare professionals, the healthcare professions and those involved in the management of healthcare institutions. Whilst also acknowledging that a range of complex factors have led to the present situation, that a variety of steps need to be taken to ensure the proper delivery of services that are comprehensive, and that there has been an absence of critical commentary and analysis of this topic by bioethicists, I conclude that there is a need to (re)assess the provision of abortion in Australia at all levels of service delivery and for the healthcare professions and healthcare professionals to take lead in doing so. That this ought to be done is clearly implied by the healthcare profession's longstanding commitment to prioritizing the needs of patient over their own interests.

Epidemiology of healthcare-associated endometritis after surgical abortion in Ukraine: results a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To determine the current prevalence of healthcare-associated endometritis after surgical abortion and antimicrobial resistance of responsible pathogens in Ukraine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective, multicentre cohort study was based on surveillance data of healthcare-associated endometritis after legal induced surgical abortion. Women who underwent induced surgical abortion at gynecological departments of 16 regional hospitals between 2020 and 2022 are included in the study. Definitions of endometritis were adapted from the CDC/NHSN. Antibiotic susceptibility was done by the disc diffusion test as recommended by EUCAST. RESULTS: Results: Among 18,328 women who underwent surgical abortion, 5,023 (27.4%) endometritis were observed. Of all post-abortion endometritis cases, 95.3% were detected after hospital discharge. The prevalence of endometritis in different types surgical abortion was: after vacuum aspiration at < 14 weeks, 23.8%, and after dilatation and evacuation at ≥ 14 weeks, 32%. The most responsible pathogens of post-abortion endometritis are Escherichia coli (24.1%), Enterococcus spp. (14.3%), Enterobacter spp. (12,8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.3%), Proteus mirabilis (6.6%), Serratia marcescens (6.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (5.9%), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (5.7%). A significant proportion these pathogens developed resistance to several antimicrobials, varying widely depending on the bacterial species, antimicrobial group. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Results this study suggest a high prevalence of endometritis after surgical abortion in Ukraine. A significant proportion of women were affected by endometritis caused by bacteria developed resistance to several antimicrobials. Optimizing the antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the burden of endometritis after surgical abortion, but prevention is the key element.

Adjuvant misoprostol or mifepristone for cervical preparation with osmotic dilators before dilation and evacuation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare effectiveness and safety of cervical preparation with osmotic dilators plus same-day misoprostol or overnight mifepristone prior to dilation and evacuation (D&E). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 664 patients initiating abortion between 18 and 22 weeks at an ambulatory health center. We abstracted medical record data from two consecutive 12-month periods in 2017 to 2019. All patients received overnight dilators plus: 600 mcg buccal misoprostol 90 minutes before D&E (period 1); 200 mg oral mifepristone at time of dilators (period 2). Our primary outcome was procedure time. We report frequency of patients experiencing any acute complication, defined as unplanned procedure (i.e., reaspiration, cervical laceration repair, uterine balloon tamponade) or hospital transfer and bleeding complications. RESULTS: We observed higher mean procedure time in the mifepristone group (9.7 ± 5.3 minutes vs 7.9 ± 4.4, p = 0.004). After adjusting for race, ethnicity, insurance, body mass index, parity, prior cesarean, prior uterine surgery, gestational age, provider, trainee participation, and long-acting reversible contraception initiation, the difference remained statistically significant (relative change 1.09, 95% CI 1.01, 1.17) but failed to reach our threshold for clinical significance. The use of additional misoprostol was more common in the mifepristone group, but the use of an additional set of dilators was not different between groups. Acute complications occurred at a frequency of 4.1% in misoprostol group and 4.3% in mifepristone group (p = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: We found procedure time to be longer with adjunctive mifepristone compared to misoprostol; however, this difference is unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Furthermore, the frequency of acute complications was similar between groups. IMPLICATIONS: Overnight mifepristone at the time of cervical dilator placement is a safe and effective alternative to adjuvant same-day misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to D&E and may offer benefits for clinic flow and patient experience.

Second-trimester dilatation and evacuation: Comparison of routine intraoperative ultrasonography versus problem-based intraoperative ultrasonography in reducing procedure-related complications: A pre-post study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether routine intraoperative ultrasonographic guidance during second-trimester dilatation and evacuation (D&E) reduces procedure-related complications in an Ethiopian setting. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post study on routine ultrasonography during second-trimester D&E at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (Ethiopia). Second-trimester D&E cases that were managed at the hospital between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed by grouping them into an intervention group (using routine ultrasound intraoperatively for all cases) and a non-intervention group (problem-based intraoperative use of ultrasound, where ultrasound was used in problem cases only). SPSS version 23 was used for analysis and simple descriptive statistics, χ2 test, multivariate regression analysis, and Fisher exact test were performed as appropriate. P values less than 0.05 and odds ratio with 95% CI were used to present the results' significance. RESULTS: A total of 242 second-trimester D&E cases were analyzed (84 cases managed under routine intraoperative ultrasound guidance and 158 cases managed with a problem-based intraoperative use of ultrasound). Compared with problem-based intraoperative use of ultrasound (using it only in selected cases), routine intraoperative ultrasound use was not associated with a decrease in D&E complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-1.16). The two factors associated with increased D&E procedure complications were advanced gestational age (aOR 13.52, 95% CI 1.86-98.52), and need for additional mechanical cervical dilatation during the D&E procedure (aOR 9.53, 95% CI 1.32-69.07). Provider experience, cervical preparation methods (laminaria vs Foley), and maternal age were not associated with occurrence of D&E complications. CONCLUSION: Our study does not support the preference of routine intraoperative ultrasound guidance over problem-based (in selected cases) intraoperative ultrasound use during the second-trimester D&E procedure. More research is needed to make a strong clinical recommendation on using routine intraoperative ultrasound guidance during all second-trimester D&E procedures.

Helping patients choose between pain control options for outpatient procedural abortion at less than 12 weeks' gestation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify predictors of patient satisfaction with their chosen pain control regimen for procedural abortion at <12 weeks' gestation in the outpatient setting. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective cohort study, we developed an instrument to evaluate predictors of satisfaction with pain control regimens among patients choosing local anesthesia alone (paracervical block with 20 mL of 1% buffered lidocaine) or local anesthesia plus intravenous (IV) moderate sedation with 100 mcg of fentanyl and 2 mg of midazolam. Our primary outcome was to identify predictors of satisfaction with both anesthesia cohorts as measured on a 4-point Likert scale, but due to high satisfaction levels in the IV group, we focused our analysis on the local anesthesia group. RESULTS: We enrolled 149 patients in the local anesthesia group and 155 in the moderate IV sedation group. The mean procedure pain scores were 6.9 (±2.1) out of 10 in the local group and 4.0 (±2.7) in the IV group (p < 0.0001). More women in the IV group (92%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the amount of pain relief they experienced compared to the local group (66%; p < 0.0001). In the univariable model, only being afraid of a minor medical procedure was predictive of less satisfaction with local anesthesia for pain control (relative risk 0.8 [95% CI, 0.6-0.9]). Age, gestational age, anticipated pain, self-reported pain tolerance, self-reported anxiety, discomfort with the abortion decision, and history of prior vaginal or cesarean delivery or induced abortion did not predict satisfaction levels. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of minor medical procedures was the only variable that predicted decreased satisfaction with local anesthesia alone for procedural abortion under 12 weeks. IMPLICATIONS: Reliable predictors for satisfaction with local anesthesia alone for procedural abortion in the outpatient setting remain elusive. Fear of minor medical procedures may serve as an indicator of decreased satisfaction and could be incorporated into patient counseling. Moderate IV sedation is associated with high satisfaction levels.

[Pain assessment during medical abortion up to 14 weeks: A 1-year prospective comparative study]. / Évaluation de la douleur lors des interruptions volontaires de grossesse médicamenteuses jusqu'à 14 semaines d'aménorrhées : une étude prospective comparative sur 1 an.

OBJECTIVES: Pain assessment of patients requesting a medical abortion according to the term, up to 14 weeks, by a numerical rating scale (NRS). METHODS: This was a single-centre prospective observational study conducted at the University Hospitals of Strasbourg from 1st October 2019 to 31st December 2020. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pain assessed by the NRS for medical abortion performed between 7-9 weeks and those performed between 9-14 weeks (6.5±2.5 vs. 6.6±2.2, P=0.85). Regardless of the term (before 7 weeks, between 7-9 weeks and between 9-14 weeks), patients felt relieved by taking painkillers in the case of medical abortion in 88.9%, 80.3% and 87.3% of cases respectively (P=0.18). The use of analgesics allowed a decrease of 3 points of the NRS in the 3 groups (P=0.67). Patients were more painful in case of medical protocol vs. surgical (maximum pain at 6.0±2.6 vs. 1.4±2.0, P<0.01), but declared to be relieved by analgesics in 85.1 and 94.3% of cases (P=0.24). CONCLUSIONS: As pain is similar whatever the term in the case of medical abortion, and its management by analgesics seems to be effective, this criterion should not guide the professional in the choice of method, particularly between 9 and 14 weeks. This choice must be made by the patient.

First and Second-Trimester Surgical Abortion Providers and Services in 2019: Results From the Canadian Abortion Provider Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to explore the workforce and clinical care of first and second-trimester surgical abortion (FTSA, STSA) providers following the publication of the updated Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) surgical abortion guidelines. METHODS: We conducted a national, cross-sectional, online, self-administered survey of physicians who provided abortion care in 2019. This anonymized survey collected participant demographics, types of abortion services, and characteristics of FTSA and STSA clinical care. Through healthcare organizations using a modified Dillman technique, we recruited from July to December 2020. Descriptive statistics were generated by R Statistical Software. RESULTS: We present the data of 222 surgical abortion provider respondents, of whom 219 provided FTSA, 109 STSA, and 106 both. Respondents practiced in every Canadian province and territory. Most were obstetrician-gynaecologists (56.8%) and family physicians (36.0%). The majority of FTSA and STSA respondents were located in urban settings, 64.8% and 79.8%, respectively, and more than 80% practiced in hospitals. More than 1 in 4 respondents reported <5 years' experience with surgical abortion care and 93.2% followed SOGC guidelines. Noted guideline deviations included that prophylactic antibiotic use was not universal, and more than half of respondents used sharp curettage in addition to suction. Fewer than 5% of STSA respondents used mifepristone for cervical preparation. CONCLUSION: The surgical abortion workforce is multidisciplinary and rejuvenating. Education, training, and practice support, including SOGC guideline implementation, are required to optimize care and to ensure equitable FTSA and STSA access in both rural and urban regions. GESTATIONAL AGE NOTATION: weeks, weeks' gestation, gestational age (GA), e.g., 116 weeks.

Bottom-up advocacy strategies to abortion access during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned towards reproductive justice in Brazil.

In Brazil, abortion is only allowed in cases of rape, serious risk to a woman's life or fetal anecephaly. Legal abortion services cover less than 4% of the Brazilian territory and only 1,800 procedures are performed, in average, per year. During the COVID-19 pandemic, almost half of the already few Brazilian abortion clinics shut down and women had to travel even longer distances, reaching abortion services at later gestational ages. In this paper, we describe three bottom-up advocacy strategies that emerged from difficulties deepened during the COVID-19 pandemic at a single abortion service in Brazil, amidst anti-gender policies from the federal government. Telemedicine abortion, outpatient surgical abortion and the provision of abortion after 20 weeks' gestation are important strategies that may reduce inequalities that impact the most vulnerable populations, such as black and indigenous women, children, adolescents and women experiencing domestic violence.

Foley catheter for cervical preparation prior to second trimester dilation and evacuation: A supply-based alternative for surgical abortion: A case series.

Objective: To document the use of Foley catheter as an alternative to osmotic dilators for cervical preparation before second trimester dilation and evacuation at a tertiary setting in Ethiopia. Methods: This is a retrospective case series conducted at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (Ethiopia) from April 1, 2021 to August 30, 2021. Forty-three cases of dilation and evacuation (D&E) in which overnight intra-cervical Foley catheter placement was used to prepare the cervix were reviewed. Data were analysed using SPSS version 23 and simple descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the clinical characteristics of study subjects and procedure outcomes. Percentages and frequencies were used to present the findings. Results: The calculated median gestational age was 21.4(17-24.2) weeks. Around 40%(17/43) of cases had cervical dilation of 3 to 4 cm, with another 33% (14/43) achieving cervical dilation of 1.5 to 2.5 cm. Additional dilation during the procedure was required only in 12 cases (28%) prior to D&E procedure. In 36 cases (84%), the procedure was attended by family planning fellow. Conclusion: Cervical preparation using overnight Foley catheter before second-trimester D&E resulted in majority of the cases requiring no additional dilation immediately prior to D&E procedure. Where osmotic dilators are not available, Foley catheter can be an alternative method to prepare the cervix prior to D&E procedures. Implications: In the absence of osmotic dilators, Foley catheter can be used as an alternate, and readily available means of cervical preparation for second trimester D&E procedures.

Cost Analysis of Surgical and Medical Uterine Evacuation Methods for First-Trimester Abortion Used in Public Hospitals in Mexico.

Background: Data on abortion procedures costs are scarce in low- and middle-income countries. In Mexico, the only known study was conducted more than a decade ago, with data from years before the abortion legislation. This study estimated the costs, from the health system's perspective, of surgical and medical abortion methods commonly used by women who undergo first-trimester abortion in Mexico. Methods: Data were collected on staff time, salaries, medications, consumables, equipment, imaging, and lab studies, at 5 public general hospitals. A bottom-up micro-costing approach was used. Results: Surgical abortion costs were US$201 for manual vacuum aspiration and US$298 for sharp curettage. The cost of medical abortion with misoprostol was US$85. The use of cervical ripening increases the costs by up to 18%. Staff comprised up to 72% of total costs in surgical abortions. Hospitalization was the area where most of the spending occurred, due to the staff and post-surgical surveillance required. Conclusions: Our estimates reflect the costs of "real-life" implementation and highlight the impact on costs of the overuse of resources not routinely recommended by clinical guidelines, such as cervical ripening for surgical abortion. This information will help decision-makers to generate policies that contribute to more efficient use of resources.

Epidemiology of placenta accreta spectrum disorders in Chinese pregnant women: A multicenter hospital-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Placenta accreta spectrum disorder (PASD) is a life-threatening obstetric complication. China still lacks high-quality data on the epidemiology of PASD. We intend to examine the major risk factors for PASD, explore the association of PASD with severe adverse perinatal outcomes and describe the geographical variations in China. METHODS: We used data from the China Labor and Delivery Survey, which included a total of 75,132 births from 96 hospitals in 24 provinces in China in 2015 and 2016. Each participating hospital randomly selected 6-10 weeks within a 12-month period. In the selected weeks, all births with gestational age ≥24 weeks or birth weight ≥500 g were included. We analyzed the demographic characteristics and prevalence of PASD in pregnant women. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association of previous caesarean section (CS) and repeated surgical abortion with PASD. We explored the association of PASD with severe adverse perinatal outcomes, which indicated by Weighted Adverse Outcome Score (WAOS) ≥ 20. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association of PASD with WAOS. We also calculated and compared the prevalence of PASD in different regions of China. RESULTS: The weighted prevalence of PASD was 2.20% (95% CI 0.76 to 4.95) in our population，and there was a substantial difference in the prevalence of PASD by geographic regions in China. Two or more previous CS (adjusted OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.41 to 3.88) and repeated surgical abortion (twice: 2.16, 1.20 to 3.92; 3 times: 4.31, 1.70 to 10.96; ≥4 times: 4.76, 3.12 to 7.26) were significant risk factors for PASD. PASD (adjusted OR 3.77, 95% CI 2.80 to 5.06) was a significant risk factor for severe adverse perinatal outcomes indicated by WAOS score. DISCUSSION: The prevalence of PASD in China appeared higher than that in other countries, and varied substantially by geographic regions. Two or more previous CS and repeated surgical abortion were major risk factors for PASD. Pregnant women with PASD had more severe adverse pregnancy outcomes. Reducing primary cesarean section and repeated surgical abortion are the key to decreasing PASD.

[Interruption of pregnancy between 12 and 16 weeks of gestation: Complications depending on term and method]. / Complications des interruptions de grossesse de 12 à 16 SA : comparaison en fonction du terme et de la méthode utilisée.

OBJECTIVE: Analyze the complication rate of pregnancy termination between 12 and 16 weeks of gestation, depending on the method and the exact term. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study focuses on patients who were going through a pregnancy termination between January 2015 and December 2020 at the Necker Universitary hospital in Paris. Two methods were applied: surgical abortion or medical evacuation. We compared 4 groups of patients depending on methods and term (12-14 or 14-16 weeks of gestation). The main complications such as hemorrhage, infection, need for surgery were collected. RESULTS: 414 patients were included. Blood loss and hemorrhage rate>500cc were higher for surgical abortion (3.5 vs 55% P<0.001), but the medical evacuation lead to an important rate of secondary aspiration for trophoblastic retention (14.7% vs 1.5% P<0.001). We didn't observe any difference regarding the complication rate for medical evacuation depending on the term. However, in case of surgical abortion the increase of term from 12-14 to 14-16 weeks of gestation leads to a tiny increment of the transfusion rate (0.6% vs 4.4% P=0.04), even if the hemorrhage rate >500cc didn't significantly differ (50,3 vs 57,9% P=0,2). CONCLUSION: Surgical abortion between 12 and 16 weeks of gestation exposed the patients to an increased hemorrhagic risk, while the medical evacuation required more secondary aspiration for trophoblastic retention. The term of the abortion didn't affect the complication rate, beside a tiny increase in transfusion rate for surgical abortion.

Intranasal fentanyl for first-trimester uterine aspiration pain: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether administration of intranasal fentanyl reduces reported pain during first-trimester uterine aspiration. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with pregnancies less than or equal to 14 weeks gestation seeking uterine aspiration for induced abortion, early pregnancy loss, or failed medication abortion. We randomized participants 1:1 to either intranasal fentanyl 100 mcg or intranasal placebo. All participants received ibuprofen and a standardized paracervical block. The primary outcome was pain indicated at the time of uterine aspiration on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). We designed the study to detect a 15 mm difference in mean pain scores, which required 53 people in each arm for a total of 106 participants. Secondary outcomes included postprocedure pain and patient satisfaction with pain control. RESULTS: From March 2017 through June 2018, we screened 355 people for eligibility and enrolled 107 participants. Those who received intranasal fentanyl reported similar uterine aspiration pain to participants who received placebo (58.4 ± 28.0 fentanyl vs 58.6 ± 24.5 placebo, p = 0.97). Participants who received intranasal fentanyl also reported similar postprocedure pain scores compared to participants who received placebo (19.1 ± 19.4 fentanyl vs 17.2 ± 19 placebo, p = 0.63), and were equally satisfied with procedure pain control (66.8 ± 31.2 fentanyl vs 63.3 ± 29.2 placebo, p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Intranasal fentanyl did not decrease reported pain with first-trimester uterine aspiration, nor did it decrease postprocedure pain compared to placebo. As an adjunct to ibuprofen and paracervical block, intranasal fentanyl did not improve patient satisfaction with pain control. IMPLICATIONS: Intranasal fentanyl does not reduce reported pain with first-trimester uterine aspiration, however abortion-seeking patients are amenable to receiving intranasal medications for pain management.

Comparison of Analgesic Effects between Nalbuphine and Sufentanil in First-Trimester Surgical Abortion: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical abortion is one of the commonly conducted procedures worldwide. Nevertheless, pregnant women still complain of procedural and postoperative pain despite the use of advanced anesthesia. It is vital to women's reproductive healthcare to improve postsurgical pain management to achieve the lowest level of pain. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial compared the analgesic effects between nalbuphine and sufentanil in patients who underwent first-trimester surgical abortion. In total, 224 patients were allocated randomly into (a) the sufentanil group that received sufentanil (0.1 ug/kg) combined propofol, and (b) the nalbuphine group that received nalbuphine (0.1 mg/kg) combined propofol. Postoperative pain scores, propofol injection pain, intraoperative analgesic effect, adverse events, and degree of satisfaction were recorded as outcome measures. RESULTS: The pain scores in the nalbuphine group were lower than those in the sufentanil group at 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, and 6 h after surgical abortion. In addition, the incidence and intensity of propofol injection pain were lower in the nalbuphine group. The degree of satisfaction of the patients in the nalbuphine group was higher than that in the sufentanil group. The intraoperative analgesic effect, hemodynamic fluctuation, and adverse events were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nalbuphine combined with propofol is superior to sufentanil combined with propofol for first-trimester abortion surgeries. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at www.chictr.org.cn , identifier ChiCTR2000040243.

HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATED INFECTION AFTER LEGAL INDUCED ABORTIONS IN UKRAINE: RESULTS A MULTICENTER STUDY.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To determine trend of legal induced surgical abortion and to assess the frequency of infection complications after termination of pregnancy in Ukraine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective multicentre cohort study was based on surveillance data of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) after legal induced surgical abortion in women's from January 2017 to 2019 in Ukraine. Definitions of HAI after induced abortion were used from the CDC/ NHSN. RESULTS: Results: The number of surgical abortions in Ukraine increased by 32.8%. A total of 25.9% HAIs were identified after surgical abortion. Of these HAIs, 25.9 were Endometritis, 21.8% Bacterial Vaginitis, 14.3% Parametritis, 13.1% Cervicitis, 9.9% Adnexa utery, 7.8% Salpingitis, 6.3% Chorioamnionitis, and 0.9% other reproductive tract infections. E.coli were most commonly reported, accounting for 25.9% of all organisms, followed by Enterococcus spp. (16.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (15.5%), P. aeruginosa (10.9%), and Enterobacter spp. (10.1%). Antimicrobial resistance in the isolates associated with HAIs showed, among the gram-positive bacteria, that 19.1% and 3.6% of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolates were b-lactam (oxacillin) - and glycopeptide-resistant, respectively. Meticillin resistance was reported in 23.2% of S aureus isolates. Vancomycin resistance was reported in 3.7% of isolated enterococci. Among the gram-negative bacteria, third-generation cephalosporins resistance was found in 33.1% of Klebsiella spp and in 24.1% of E.coli isolates. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The results of this study revealed high rates of HAIs after surgical abortion and most causing pathogens were associated with resistant to antibiotic strains. This knowledge is essential to develop targeted strategies to surveillance and reduce the incidence of post-abortion infections.

Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: Pain control in surgical abortion part 2 - Moderate sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia.

Analgesic options for surgical abortion (also called procedural abortion) beyond local anesthesia and minimal sedation include moderate sedation, deep sedation and general anesthesia. These clinical recommendations review the effectiveness of various moderate sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia regimens for pain control during abortion; medication regimens used to induce analgesia and anesthesia; patient factors affecting anesthesia safety; preoperative and intraoperative protocols to reduce anesthesia risks; personnel qualifications for administration; recommended patient monitoring protocols; and general risks of anesthesia in the context of abortion care. The scope of these recommendations is based on limited available evidence and considerably relies on existing professional society guidelines and recommendations developed by content experts and reviewers. Further research to compare the efficacy and safety of different regimens is needed.

Prescription opioid fills following surgical abortion.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize opioid fills after surgical abortion among US commercially-insured women. STUDY DESIGN: We identified women aged 15-50 years with an outpatient claim for dilation and curettage or evacuation surgical abortion (D&C/D&E) in IBM MarketScan 2015-2018 and excluded patients with > 1 opioid fill in the prior 90 days, evidence of opioid dependence or abuse in the prior 180 days (baseline), miscarriage in 7 days prior, or mifepristone use in 3 to 7 days prior. We describe the frequency of an oral opioid fill within 7 days after abortion, refill within 42 days of initial fill, and chronic use (≥ 6 fills) in 1 year after abortion. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate predictors of opioid fill including patient and procedure characteristics. RESULTS: Among 28,252 patients who underwent induced surgical abortion, 2,340 (8.3%) filled an opioid prescription within 7 days. The strongest predictors of opioid fill were non-Northeast region, use of moderate sedation for the procedure, and baseline depression. Among 2,250 patients with an initial fill and sufficient follow-up, 10.0% had a refill within 42 days of initial fill. Among 15,353 patients with sufficient follow-up, patients with an opioid fill after abortion had a higher percentage of subsequent chronic use than those without (2.1% and 0.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The frequency of an opioid fill after surgical abortion among commercially-insured women was notable given it is not recommended for post-procedural analgesia. Opioid prescribing contrary to recommendations may be associated with subsequent chronic use or abuse. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: Despite public health efforts to decrease opioid prescribing, these findings suggest opioid prescribing after surgical abortion as a potential source of overprescribing among commercially insured patients in the United States. As surgical abortion is a minimally-invasive procedure, prescribing opioids for use in this setting may contribute to chronic use.

Pain medication requirements in patients with opioid use disorder at the time of surgical abortion: An exploratory study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess sedation medication dosage differences between patients with and without opioid use disorder at the time of surgical abortion. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients obtaining a surgical abortion in our ambulatory procedure unit between 2012 and 2017. We identified 64 patients with documented opioid use disorder at the time of their procedure and assigned 64 patients without opioid use disorder to a control cohort. We reviewed patient characteristics and calculated total doses of midazolam and fentanyl administered to patients. We used multivariate linear regression modelling to model the amount of medication administered to each group while controlling for confounders. RESULTS: The exposed and unexposed cohorts were similar in terms of baseline characteristics except for race. The cohort of patients with opioid use disorder was predominantly White (n = 55, 86%) and completely English speaking (n = 64, 100%), whereas the control cohort was majority Black (n = 39, 61%) and mostly English speaking (n = 44, 69%) On average, patients with opioid use disorder received 22 mcg more fentanyl (110 mcg vs 88 mcg, p < 0.001) and 0.4 mg more midazolam (2.7 mg vs 2.3 mg, p = 0.001) than patients without opioid use disorder. After adjusting for prior abortions, parity, English speaking status, psychiatric conditions, and education, we found smaller differences in both fentanyl (15 mcg, 95% CI 1.7, 28.2 mg) and midazolam dosages (0.3 mg, 95% CI -0.01, 0.6) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with and without opioid use disorder received similar doses of midazolam and fentanyl for moderate sedation for surgical abortion. IMPLICATIONS: This study suggests that standard medication titration protocols utilized with moderate sedation for surgical abortions need not be changed for patients with opioid use disorder. Moderate sedation can be a helpful option for pain control for this vulnerable population.

Standardizing abortion research outcomes (STAR): Results from an international consensus development study.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, for future abortion randomized controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN: We extracted outcomes from quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews of abortion studies to assess using a modified Delphi method. Via email, we invited researchers, clinicians, patients, and healthcare organization representatives with expertise in abortion to rate the importance of the outcomes on a 9-point Likert scale. After 2 rounds, we used descriptive analyses to determine which outcomes met the predefined consensus criteria. We finalized the core outcome set during a series of consensus development meetings. RESULTS: We entered 42 outcomes, organized in 15 domains, into the Delphi survey. Two-hundred eighteen of 251 invitees (87%) provided responses (203 complete responses) for round 1 and 118 of 218 (42%) completed round2. Sixteen experts participated in the development meetings. The final outcome set includes 15 outcomes: 10 outcomes apply to all abortion trials (successful abortion, ongoing pregnancy, death, hemorrhage, uterine infection, hospitalization, surgical intervention, pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and patients' experience of abortion); 2 outcomes apply to only surgical abortion trials (uterine perforation and cervical injury), one applies only to medical abortion trials (uterine rupture); and 2 apply to trials evaluating abortions with anesthesia (over-sedation/respiratory depression and local anesthetic systemic toxicity). CONCLUSION: Using robust consensus science methods we have developed a core outcome set for future abortion research. IMPLICATIONS: Standardized outcomes in abortion research could decrease heterogeneity among trials and improve the quality of systematic reviews and clinical guidelines. Researchers should select, collect, and report these core outcomes in future abortion trials. Journal editors should advocate for core outcome set reporting.