A More Targeted and Selective Use of Implantable Loop Recorders Improves the Effectiveness of Syncope Units: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: Syncope remains a common medical problem. Recently, the role of dedicated syncope units and implantable loop recorders has emerged in the investigation of unexplained syncope. This study aims to investigate the possibilities for a more rational and targeted use of various diagnostic tools. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, 196 patients with unexplained syncope were included between March 2019 and February 2023. Various diagnostic tools were utilized during the investigation, according to clinical judgement. Patients were retrospectively allocated into Group A (including those who, among other tests, underwent loop recorder insertion) and Group B (including patients investigated without loop recorder implantation). Data were compared with Group C, including patients assessed prior to syncope unit establishment. RESULTS: There was no difference between Group A (n = 133) and Group B (n = 63) in the diagnostic yield (74% vs. 76%, p = 0.22). There were significant differences between Groups A and B regarding age (67.3 ± 16.9 years vs. 48.3 ± 19.1 years, p < 0.001) and cause of syncope (cardiogenic in 69% of Group A, reflex syncope in 77% of Group B, p < 0.001). Electrocardiography-based diagnosis occurred in 55% and 19% of Groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.001). The time to diagnosis was 4.2 ± 2.7 months in Group A and 7.5 ± 5.6 months in Group B (p < 0.001). In Group C, the diagnostic yield was 57.9% and the electrocardiography-based diagnostic yield was 18.3%. CONCLUSIONS: A selective use of loop recorders according to clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics increases the effectiveness of the structured syncope unit approach and further preserves financial resources.

Recent Advances and Future Directions in Syncope Management: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Syncope is a highly prevalent clinical condition characterized by a rapid, complete, and brief loss of consciousness, followed by full recovery caused by cerebral hypoperfusion. This symptom carries significance, as its potential underlying causes may involve the heart, blood pressure, or brain, leading to a spectrum of consequences, from sudden death to compromised quality of life. Various factors contribute to syncope, and adhering to a precise diagnostic pathway can enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment effectiveness. A standardized initial assessment, risk stratification, and appropriate test identification facilitate determining the underlying cause in the majority of cases. New technologies, including artificial intelligence and smart devices, may have the potential to reshape syncope management into a proactive, personalized, and data-centric model, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life. This review addresses key aspects of syncope management, including pathogenesis, current diagnostic testing options, treatments, and considerations in the geriatric population.

Step-by-step guide to creating the best syncope units: From combined United States and European experiences.

Syncope can be caused by many physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Causes of syncope encompass a wide range of conditions from benign vasovagal syncope to life-threatening arrhythmias. The lack of a standardized method of evaluation and management of this large patient population leads to a wide practice variation which results in broad-based testing, frequent hospital admission and high healthcare cost. The concept of a syncope observational unit was created for inpatients and outpatients in the United States and Europe. Studies have demonstrated that syncope units, staffed by trained health care providers with sufficient resources could expedite and improve diagnostic yield, reduce hospital admission, and result in decreased healthcare cost with favorable clinical outcomes. The implementation of a standardized syncope unit has been challenging because resources and health care systems are variable regionally, nationally, and internationally. In this review, we provide an overview of the evidences that support a standardized syncope unit practice. We provide step-by-step algorithms for the "best syncope units" in the inpatient and outpatient settings by combining the synergistic experiences from the United States and Europe.

The Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Syncope Units Activities in Italy: A Report from the Italian Multidisciplinary Working Group on Syncope (GIMSI).

The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on Syncope Units (SUs) Activities in Italy. Methods: Data about types of SU activities and admissions were obtained from 10 SUs throughout Italy, certified by the Italian Multidisciplinary Working Group on Syncope (GIMSI), from 10 March 2020 to 31 December 2020 and compared with the same time frame in 2019. Results: A remarkable reduction in overall non-invasive diagnostic tests (-67%; p < 0.001) and cardiac invasive procedure. Elective cardiac pacing procedures disclosed a significant decrease (-62.7%; p < 0.001); conversely, the decrease of urgent procedures was not significant (-50%; p = 0.08). There was a significantly increased rate of patients who underwent both telemedicine follow-up visits (+225%, p < 0.001) and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) remote monitoring follow-up visits (+100%; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The COVID-19 outbreak was associated with a remarkable decrease in all clinical activities of Syncope Units in Italy, including both non-invasive tests and cardiac invasive procedures; conversely, a significant increase in telehealth activities was shown.

Factors facilitating and hindering the implementation of the European Society of Cardiology Syncope Guidelines at the Emergency Department: A nationwide qualitative study.

AIMS: Syncope care is often fragmented and inefficient. Structuring syncope care through implementation of guidelines and Syncope Units has been shown to improve diagnostic yield, reduce costs and improve quality of life. We implemented the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2018 syncope guidelines at the Emergency Departments (ED) and established Syncope Units in five Dutch hospitals. We evaluated the implementation process by identifying factors that hinder ('barriers') and facilitate ('facilitators') the implementation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted, recorded and transcribed semi-structured interviews with 19 specialists and residents involved in syncope care from neurology, cardiology, internal medicine and emergency medicine. Two researchers independently classified the reported barriers and facilitators, according to the framework of qualitative research (Flottorp), which distinguished several separate fields ('levels'). Software package Atlas.ti was used for analysis. We identified 31 barriers and 22 facilitators. Most barriers occurred on the level of the individual health care professional (e.g. inexperienced residents having to work with the guideline at the ED) and the organizational context (e.g. specialists not relinquishing preceding procedures). Participants reported most facilitators at the level of innovation (e.g. structured work-flow at the ED). The multidisciplinary Syncope Unit was welcomed as useful solution to a perceived need in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Implementing ESC syncope guidelines at the ED and establishing Syncope Units facilitated a structured multidisciplinary work-up for syncope patients. Most identified barriers related to the individual health care professional and the organizational context. Future implementation of the multidisciplinary guideline should be tailored to address these barriers.

EGSYS score for the prediction of cardiac etiology in syncope: Is it useful in an outpatient setting? / Score EGSYS para predição de etiologia cardíaca na síncope: tem utilidade no contexto de consulta?

INTRODUCTION: The EGSYS score uses clinical variables to predict which patients may have cardiac (CS) or non-cardiac syncope (NCS) and has been validated in the emergency department setting. This study aims to determine whether the score has the same applicability in an outpatient setting. METHODS: In this retrospective study of all patients observed in the outpatient setting of a hospital with a syncope unit between January 2015 and December 2016, the EGSYS score was calculated for each patient, and its sensitivity and specificity were determined for the prediction of CS in patients with score ≥3. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients, mean age 64.3±21.7 years, 116 (51.8%) male, were analyzed. In the 163 (72.7%) patients with confirmed syncope, CS was diagnosed in 27 (16.6%) and NCS in 136 (83.4%). The EGSYS score was ≥3 in 40 (20.0%) patients with NCS and in 13 (48.1%) with CS. A positive score had a sensitivity of 48.2% (95% CI: 28.7-68.1), a specificity of 77.9% (95% CI: 70.0-84.6), and a positive and negative predictive value of 30.2% (95% CI: 20.8-41.8) and 88.3% (95% CI: 83.9-91.7), respectively. CONCLUSION: The EGSYS score has limited usefulness in an outpatient setting, where observed patients have already been been medically assessed. Given its high specificity and negative predictive value, it may be useful to reassure low-risk patients and family members.

Contemporary management of patients with syncope in clinical practice: an EHRA physician-based survey.

Syncope is a heterogeneous syndrome encompassing a large spectrum of mechanisms and outcomes. The European Society of Cardiology published an update of the Syncope Guidelines in 2018. The aim of the present survey was to capture contemporary management of syncope and guideline implementation among European physicians. A 23-item questionnaire was presented to 2588 European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) members from 32 European countries. The response rate was 48%, but only complete responses (n = 161) were included in this study. The questionnaire contained specific items regarding syncope facilities, diagnostic definitions, diagnostic tools, follow-up, and therapy. The survey revealed that many respondents did not have syncope units (88%) or dedicated management algorithms (44%) at their institutions, and 45% of the respondents reported syncope-related hospitalization rates >25%, whereas most (95%) employed close monitoring and hospitalization in syncope patients with structural heart disease. Carotid sinus massage, autonomic testing, and tilt-table testing were inconsistently used. Indications were heterogeneous for implanted loop recorders (79% considered them for recurrent syncope in high-risk patients) or electrophysiological studies (67% considered them in bifascicular block and inconclusive non-invasive testing). Non-pharmacological therapy was consistently considered by 68% of respondents; however, there was important variation regarding the choice of drug and device therapy. While revealing an increased awareness of syncope and good practice, our study identified important unmet needs regarding the optimal management of syncope and variable syncope guideline implementation.

Use of a Pediatric Syncope Unit Improves Diagnosis and Lowers Costs: A Hospital-Based Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of a dedicated pediatric syncope unit on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of children with suspected syncope. We also evaluated the effectiveness of the pediatric syncope unit model in decreasing unnecessary tests and hospitalizations, minimizing social costs, and improving diagnostic yield. STUDY DESIGN: This single-center cohort observational, prospective study enrolled 2278 consecutive children referred to Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital from 2012 to 2017. Characteristics of the study population, number and type of admission examinations, and diagnostic findings before the pediatric syncope unit was implemented (2012-2013) and after the pediatric syncope unit was implemented (2014-2015 and 2016-2017) were compared. RESULTS: The proportion of undefined syncope, number of unnecessary diagnostic tests performed, and number of hospital stay days decreased significantly (P < .0001), with an overall decrease in costs. A multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted for confounding variables (age, sex, number of diagnostic tests), the period after pediatric syncope unit (2016-2017) resulted as the best independent predictor of effectiveness for a defined diagnosis of syncope (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric syncope unit organization with fast-tracking access more appropriate diagnostic tests is effective in terms of accuracy of diagnostic yield and reduction of costs.

Retrospective analysis of patients with dizziness evaluated in Syncope Unit: a real life experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the characteristics of patients referred for dizziness to a Syncope Unit. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. Of 491 patients referred to the Syncope Unit of Careggi Hospital in 2015, 198 (40.3%) who experienced dizziness alone or associated with a history of transient loss of consciousness were enrolled. All the patients underwent an initial evaluation according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on syncope. We compared the clinical characteristics and final diagnosis of patients referred for dizziness alone (n = 64) to those of patients with dizziness and history of transient loss of consciousness (n = 134). RESULTS: The study population had a mean age of 62 ± 20 years (range 16-96 years) and 101 (51%) were female. A final diagnosis of pre-syncope was made in about the 80% of the patients without a previous history of transient loss of consciousness. In this group, other diagnoses were benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (6.3%), transient ischemic attack (4.7%) or psychogenic dizziness (7.8%). Syncope was diagnosed in the 82.7% of the patients with dizziness and history of transient loss of consciousness. CONCLUSION: Dizziness was the main reason for referral to the Syncope Unit in almost one-third of the patients, in whom pre-syncope was the most frequent final diagnosis. Otological, neurological and psychiatric disorders should be also considered as differential diagnosis, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.

Assessment of a structured management pathway for patients referred to the Emergency Department for syncope: results in a tertiary hospital.

AIMS: High hospitalization rates (39-58% in the literature) of patients admitted to Emergency Department (ED) for transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC) suspected for syncope are still an unresolved issue. The presence of an Observation Unit has reduced hospital admissions and the duration of hospitalization in controlled studies, and a Syncope Unit (SU) in the hospital may reduce hospitalization and increase the number of diagnoses in patients with T-LOC. We assessed the effect of a structured organization on hospitalization rate and outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients referred to the ED for a T-LOC of a suspected syncopal nature as the main diagnosis were included. The ED physician was trained to choose between: hospital admission (directly or after short observation); discharge after short (<48-h) observation; discharge on a fast track to the SU; and direct discharge without any further diagnostics. From January to June 2010, 362 patients were evaluated in the ED: 29% were admitted, 20% underwent short observation in the ED, 20% were referred to the SU, and 31% were directly discharged. Follow-up data were available on 295 patients who were discharged alive: of these, 1 (0.3%) previously hospitalized patient died within 30 days and 16 (5.4%) died within 1 year. Death rates were 12.9, 3.3, 0, and 2.5% among admitted, observation, SU, and ED-discharged patients, respectively. No death could be directly attributed to T-LOC. Re-admission within 1 year for any cause occurred in 72 (24%) patients; re-admission rates were 45.9, 19.3, 11.5, and 18.0% among admitted, observation, SU, and ED-discharged patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of short observation and a SU seems to reduce the hospitalization rate compared with previous reported historical reports from our and other centres. Most deaths during follow-up occurred in patients who had been hospitalized. High rates of re-admission to the ED within 1 year are still an issue.

Current investigation and management of patients with syncope: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey.

The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to provide an insight into the current practice of work-up and management of patients with syncope among members of the EHRA electrophysiology research network. Responses were received from 43 centres. The majority of respondents (74%) had no specific syncope unit and only 42% used a standardized assessment protocol or algorithm. Hospitalization rates varied from 10% to 25% (56% of the centres) to >50% (21% of the centres). The leading reasons for hospitalization were features suggesting arrhythmogenic syncope (85% of respondents), injury (80%), structural heart disease (73%), significant comorbidities (54%), and older age (41%). Most widely applied tests were electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, and Holter monitoring followed by carotid sinus massage and neurological evaluation. An exercise test, tilt table test, electrophysiological study, and implantation of a loop recorder were performed only if there was a specific indication. The use of a tilt table test varied widely: 44% of respondents almost always performed it when neurally mediated syncope was suspected, whereas 37% did not perform it when there was a strong evidence for neurally mediated syncope. Physical manoeuvres were the most widely (93%) applied standard treatment for this syncope form. The results of this survey suggest that there are significant differences in the management of patients with syncope across Europe, specifically with respect to hospitalization rates and indications for tilt table testing in neurally mediated syncope. The majority of centres reported using ECG, echocardiography, and Holter monitoring as their main diagnostic tools in patients with syncope, whereas a smaller proportion of centres applied specific assessment algorithms. Physical manoeuvres were almost uniformely reported as the standard treatment for neurally mediated syncope.