RESUMO
BACKGROUND: T315I mutations of the BCR::ABL1 gene lead to resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study evaluated the performance of digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in quantifying T315I mutations and their frequency in Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) positive hematological patients. METHODS: The course of disease and BCR::ABL1 fusion transcripts (e13a2, e14a2 and e1a2) were retrospectively reviewed in 21 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 85 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). T315I mutation analysis was carried out using ddPCR and the limit of detection was assessed using mutant T315I DNA at varying variant allele fractions. RESULTS: T315I mutations were found in two ALL patients and one CML patient without remission in molecular biology and with mutation burdens of 29.20%, 40.85%, and 3.00%, respectively. The mutation burden of ALL patients was higher than that of CML patients, but there was no significant difference between the two (p-value = 0.0536). The test's limit of detection was 0.02% with a correlation coefficient greater than 0.99 between the expected and actual detection abundances. CONCLUSION: T315I mutations have a high incidence in Ph-positive ALL patients even if the course of disease is short. In molecular biology, T315I mutation detection is indicated for CML patients not in remission.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematological disorder that in rare cases, mainly in CML neutrophilic, presents the e19a2 rearrangement. The encoded product is a 230-KDa protein. Despite the remarkable responses to treatment of most patients, a small but significant fraction of them develop clinical resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The most common mechanism of resistance is point mutations in the ABL1 kinase domain. The recently approved third-generation TKI ponatinib demonstrated remarkable activity in patients with multi-TKI-resistant disease. Particularly impressive was its efficacy in patients with T315I mutation that is resistant to all other TKIs. METHODS: Qualitative PCR was carried out by multiplex approach. Relative transcripts quantification was performed by one-step real-time PCR, with a specific Taqman probe and primers for the e19a2 rearrangement. We carried out a mutational screening by high-resolution melting, and the mutation was identified by Sanger method. The mutation burden was quantified by quantitative PCR using allele-specific primers. RESULTS: In a patient with CML, we identified a PCR product corresponding to e19a2 rearrangement harboring T315I mutation. At the time of mutational analysis, during dasatinib treatment, the T315I clone was 100% and the quantification of BCR-ABL1 was 18%. After ponatinib therapy, the T315I mutation burden decreased down to undetectable levels and the BCR-ABL1 transcripts showed a very low value (0.011%). CONCLUSIONS: Here, we report the hematological, cytogenetic, and molecular response of a patient with refractory CML in chronic phase with e19a2 transcripts, carrying T315I mutation that was successfully treated with ponatinib.