Factors associated with failed 'test of cure' in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictive factors associated with failed 'test of cure' (TOC) in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all patients treated by large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ) between 1st April 2014 and 1st April 2019. Those with no documented HPV genotype on referral, no TOC outcome, those having a hysterectomy, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were excluded from final analysis. RESULTS: Patients referred with a singular HPV genotype of HPV 16, HPV 18, or HPV Other types (HPV O) were significantly more likely to pass TOC than those referred with multiple HPV genotypes (p < 0.0001). Those with HPV genotypes including HPV O were significantly more likely to fail TOC as compared to those with genotypes of solely HPV 16 and/or 18 (p < 0.0001). Patients aged ≥51 years were significantly more likely to fail TOC when compared to all other age groups (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Age >51 yrs. and infection with multiple hr-HPV types were predictors of post treatment hr-HPV persistence. Knowledge of HPV genotype both at referral, and following treatment, could allow a more individualised, and patient-centred, approach to both the management and follow up of CIN. HPV genotype should be reported as standard on all cervical screening sample results. The term HPV O should not be utilised and instead actual HPV genotype should be reported. This would enable us to optimise not only future research but would also allow future monitoring of the efficacy of vaccination programmes.

Implications of the paradigm shift in management of Helicobacter pylori infections.

The recent availability of susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori infections in the United Sates has resulted in paradigm shifts in the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of H. pylori infections. Here, we reviewed the English literature concerning changes in H. pylori diagnosis and therapy with an emphasis on the last 3 years. We focus on the new methods that offer rapid and convenient susceptibility testing using either invasive (endoscopic) or noninvasive (stool) methods of obtaining test material. We also discuss the implications of this availability on therapy and follow-up after therapy. The approach to therapy was categorized into four groups: (1) therapies that can be used empirically, (2) therapies that should be restricted to those that are susceptibility-based, (3) potentially effective therapies that have yet to be optimized for local use, and (4), therapies that contain unneeded antibiotics that should not be prescribed. The most convenient and efficient method of susceptibility testing is by using reflexive stool testing in which if the sample is positive, it is automatically also used for determination of susceptibility. Reflexive testing can also be done via reflexive ordering (e.g., for all positive urea breath tests). The post therapy test-of-cure has emerged as a critical component of therapy as it not only provides feedback regarding treatment success but when combined with susceptibility testing also provide evidence regarding the cause of failure (e.g., poor adherence versus emergence of resistance during therapy. Susceptibility testing has made even the most current H. pylori guidelines for diagnosis and therapy generally obsolete. Clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin triple therapies should only be administered as susceptibility-based therapy. Regimens containing unneeded antibiotics should not be given. We provide recommendations regarding the details and indications for all current therapies.

Clinical performance of DNA and RNA based HPV tests for test of cure (TOC) post treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) - a retrospective study.

HPV testing as a "test of cure" (TOC) of women treated for cervical high-grade lesions can support and inform appropriate clinical management pathways. However, there is a lack of studies that report the discrete performance of different HPV assays in this context, including HPV mRNA based assays. To address this, we performed an analysis of the clinical performance of two hrHPV assays in the (TOC) setting; the recently launched DNA based Alinity m HR HPV (Abbott Molecular) and RNA based Aptima HPV assay (Hologic). Using a retrospective case-control design, two panels of archived cervical liquid based cytology samples, originally taken as per routine TOC protocols in Scotland were assessed. Each panel contained 63 cases, where cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or worse (CIN2+) was detected and 160 controls (women with no CIN2+ and two subsequent cytology negative results (minimum) 3 years apart or women who had histologically confirmed ≤CIN1). All samples were previously tested using the RealTime High Risk HPV assay (Abbott Molecular) as per national TOC protocol. Panel A and Panel B were tested using Alinity and Aptima assay respectively. Both assays showed similar performance to the original RealTime assay. Aptima had sensitivity for CIN2+ of 96.8% (95% CI: 89.0- 99.6) compared to RealTime (93.7% (95% CI: 84.5 - 98.2)). Alinity had sensitivity for CIN2+ of 92.1% (95% CI: 82.4- 97.4) compared to RealTime (98.4% (95% CI: 91.5- 99.95)). Both mRNA based and DNA based HPV tests show robust performance for the monitoring of residual disease post-treatment.

Primer for Development of Guidelines for Helicobacter pylori Therapy Using Antimicrobial Stewardship.

We provide a primer to assist in the difficult transition of Helicobacter pylori therapy guidelines to those that adhere to the principles of antimicrobial stewardship. This transition will entail abandonment of many of the principles that heretofore formed the basis of treatment guidelines and recommendations. The goals of antimicrobial stewardship include optimization of the use of antibiotics while reducing antimicrobial resistance. The critical outcome measure is absolute cure rate which largely restricts comparative trials to those which reliably produce high cure rates (eg, ∼95%). Therapies that fail to achieve at least a 90% cure rate should be abandoned as unacceptable. Because only optimized therapies should be prescribed, guidance on the principles and practices of optimization will we required. Therapies that contain antibiotics which do not contribute to outcome should be eliminated. Surveillance, one of the fundamental elements of antimicrobial stewardship, must be done to provide ongoing assurance that the recommended therapies remain effective. It is yet not widely recognized when utilizing otherwise highly successful therapies, the routine test of cure data is an indirect, surrogate method for susceptibility testing. To systematically guide therapy, test of cure data should be collected, shared and integrated into local antimicrobial stewardship programs to provide guidance regarding best practices to both prescribers and public health individuals. Treatment recommendations should be compatible with those of the American Society of Infectious Disease white paper on the conduct of superiority and organism-specific clinical trials of antibacterial agents for the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant bacterial pathogens which include criteria for ethical active-controlled superiority studies of antibacterial agents.

Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia2+ Recurrence.

To evaluate the significance of HPV persistence as a predictor for the development of CIN2+ recurrence and the impact of multiple genotypes and of HPV 16/18 on recurrence risk. A prospective cohort observational study was carried out at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, from December 2006 to December 2014. A total of 408 women surgically treated by excisional procedure for pre-neoplastic and neoplastic cervical lesions were enrolled. HPV test was performed at baseline and at first follow-up visit planned at 6 ± 3 months after treatment. Two-year cumulative incidences for relapse were estimated and compared by the Gray's test. Overall, 96 (23.5%) patients were persistent for at least one genotype at three to nine months from baseline and 21 (5.1%) patients relapsed. The two-year cumulative relapse incidence was higher in HPV persistent patients compared to not-persistent (CIF = 27.6%, 95% CI: 16.2-40.2% versus CIF = 1.7%, 95% CI: 0.3-5.8%, p < 0.001), in women with persistent multiple infections (CIF = 27.2%, 95% CI: 7.3-52.3%, p < 0.001), and with the persistence of at least one genotype between 16 and 18, irrespective of the presence of other HR genotypes (CIF = 32.7%, 95% CI: 17.9-48.3%, p < 0.001), but not significantly different from women positive for single infections or any other HR genotype, but not for 16 and 18. The risk of CIN2+ recurrence should not be underestimated when same HPV genotype infection persists after treatment.

Are we managing our patients correctly following treatment for cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia? A review of practice at the Jessop Wing Colposcopy Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Women diagnosed with cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) remain at risk of further pre-malignant and malignant disease and require rigorous post-treatment follow-up. We assess the effectiveness and safety of community cervical sampling follow-up in women treated for CGIN. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of women diagnosed with CGIN between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2019, at Jessop Wing Colposcopy Unit, Sheffield, UK. RESULTS: Of 140 women diagnosed with CGIN, 76 had co-existing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Cytologists were significantly more likely to report glandular neoplasia in the absence of co-existing CIN, and high-grade dyskaryosis in its presence (Ps < 0.0001). Co-existing CIN was significantly more likely to be present with high or low-grade compared to normal colposcopy findings (P < 0.0001). The 6-month test of cure (TOC) was attended by 67% of women (84% within 12 months), and the 18-month post-treatment sampling by 52.5% of women (70% within 24 months). Colposcopy recalled 96% of women correctly for the 18-month sampling, but 20% of women undertaking primary care samples were incorrectly recalled at 3 years instead. CONCLUSIONS: When CGIN is diagnosed, two dates for recall should be provided at 6 and 18 months post-treatment to the Cervical Screening Administration Service and the centralised screening laboratory ensuring the 18-month post-treatment sample is correctly appointed, preventing women with HPV-negative TOC samples being returned to 3-year recall. Follow-up of CGIN should be closely audited by the centralised laboratories ensuring women with CGIN are not put at additional risk.

Helicobacter pylori diagnosis and therapy in the era of antimicrobial stewardship.

The diagnosis and therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection have undergone major changes based on the use the principles of antimicrobial stewardship and increased availability of susceptibility profiling. H. pylori gastritis now recognized as an infectious disease, as such there is no placebo response allowing outcome to be assessed in relation to the theoretically obtainable cure rate of 100%. The recent recognition of H. pylori as an infectious disease has changed the focus to therapies optimized to reliably achieve high cure rates. Increasing antimicrobial resistance has also led to restriction of clarithromycin, levofloxacin, or metronidazole to susceptibility-based therapies. Covid-19 resulted in the almost universal availability of polymerase chain reaction testing in hospitals which can be repurposed to utilize readily available kits to provide rapid and inexpensive detection of clarithromycin resistance. In the United States, major diagnostic laboratories now offer H. pylori culture and susceptibility testing and American Molecular Laboratories offers next-generation sequencing susceptibility profiling of gastric biopsies or stools for the six commonly used antibiotics without need for endoscopy. Current treatment recommendations include (a) only use therapies that are reliably highly effective locally, (b) always perform a test-of-cure, and (c) use that data to confirm local effectiveness and share the results to inform the community regarding which therapies are effective and which are not. Empiric therapy should be restricted to those proven highly effective locally. The most common choices are 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy and rifabutin triple therapy. Prior guidelines and treatment recommendations should only be used if proven locally highly effective.

Role of Colposcopy after Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

Colposcopy is often used in follow-up after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) despite its marked inter-observer variability and low sensitivity. Our objective was to assess the role of colposcopy in post-treatment follow-up in comparison to hrHPV (high-risk human papillomavirus) testing, cytology, and cone margin status. Altogether, 419 women treated for histological high-grade lesion (HSIL) with large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) attended colposcopy with cytology and hrHPV test at six months. Follow-up for recurrence of HSIL continued for 24 months. Colposcopy was considered positive if colposcopic impression was recorded as high grade and cytology if HSIL, ASC-H (atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude HSIL), or AGC-FN (atypical glandular cells, favor neoplasia) were present. Overall, 10 (10/419, 2.4%) recurrent HSIL cases were detected, 5 at 6 months and 5 at 12 months. Colposcopic impression was recorded at 407/419 6-month visits and was positive for 11/407 (2.7%). None of them had recurrent lesions, resulting in 0% sensitivity and 97% specificity for colposcopy. Sensitivity for the hrHPV test at 6 months was 100% and specificity 85%, for cytology 40% and 99%, and for margin status at treatment 60% and 82%, respectively. While the hrHPV test is highly sensitive in predicting recurrence after local treatment for CIN, colposcopy in an unselected population is not useful in follow-up after treatment of CIN.

Compliance with follow-up Test of Cure and outcomes after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Victoria, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Test of Cure (ToC), a combination of testing for oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) and cytology, at 12 months post-treatment and annually thereafter, was approved in Australia in 2005 for follow-up of women treated for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) of the cervix. AIMS: To determine among women resident in Victoria, Australia, the compliance with ToC and the incidence of recurrence up to five years after successful ToC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of women with HSIL (diagnosed at pre-treatment punch biopsy or at excision) who had excisional treatment between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2011. De-identified data were retrieved from the Victorian Cervical Cytology Registry in Melbourne as at 24 April, 2015. Successful ToC is defined as the occurrence of two consecutive normal (negative) co-tests. Recurrence after treatment is defined by histologically detected HSIL or greater. RESULTS: There were 8478 women who had excisional treatment for HSIL, with 448 (5.5%) experiencing recurrence. Only 2253 (26.6%) women successfully completed ToC, with a decreasing likelihood of ToC completion by time since year of treatment (32.0% in 2007 compared with 20.9% in 2011). Only one (0.08%) woman had HSIL on histology after successful ToC. From the 2007 cohort, 555 (32.0%) women completed ToC successfully and no HSIL recurrence occurred thereafter (median subsequent follow-up period of 4.7 years). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that women who successfully complete ToC can be returned to five-year routine screening. However, more concerted efforts are needed to ensure that all women treated complete ToC.

[¿Azitromicina como tratamiento contra Chlamydia trachomatis?]

Azithromycin and doxycycline effectiveness has been demonstrated in the treatment of urogenital chlamydiasis, which has remained unchanged for a long time. Autoinoculation has been proposed as a method of reinfection and persistence of the disease in women and probably also owing to azithromycin pharmacokinetics in this tissue. With the new diagnostic methods and tests of cure, a difference has been demonstrated in favor of doxycycline in the treatment of rectal chlamydiasis Antimicrobial resistance has not played a relevant role since no treatment-resistant strains have been found in vivo. Nevertheless, azithromycin remains a first-choice drug, since it can be administered as a single dose, which favors therapeutic adherence.

Se ha demostrado la efectividad de la azitromicina y la doxiciclina en el tratamiento de la clamidiasis urogenital, lo que se ha mantenido sin cambios por mucho tiempo. Se ha propuesto la autoinoculación como método de reinfección y persistencia de la enfermedad en las mujeres y también debido a la farmacocinética de la azitromicina en este tejido. Con los nuevos métodos diagnósticos y las pruebas de curación se ha comprobado una diferencia a favor de la doxiciclina en el tratamiento de la clamidiasis rectal. La resistencia antimicrobiana no ha desempeñado un papel relevante porque no se han encontrado cepas resistentes in vivo al tratamiento. A pesar de ello, la azitromicina sigue siendo un fármaco de primera elección ya que puede administrarse como una dosis única, lo que favorece el apego terapéutico.

Validation of Apolipoprotein A-1 and Fibronectin Fragments as Markers of Parasitological Cure for Congenital Chagas Disease in Children Treated With Benznidazole.

BACKGROUND: No reliable tests or validated biomarkers exist to ensure parasitological cure following treatment of Chagas disease (CD) patients chronically infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. As seroreversion, the only marker of cure, happens more quickly in children, we investigated the correlation between previously identified biomarkers and seroreversion in children. METHODS: Thirty CD children (age 1 month to 10 years) diagnosed as T. cruzi positive (time point S0) were treated with benznidazole (BZ) 5-8 mg/kg/d for 60 days. At least 2 serological tests were used to evaluate treatment efficacy from the end of treatment (S1) until seroreversion (S2). Thirty children (age 1 month to 10 years) and 15 adults were used as healthy controls (HCs). Immunoblot and a proteomic-based assay were used to validate previously identified fragments of apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoA1) and fibronectin (FBN) as CD biomarkers. RESULTS: Correlation between seroreversion and absence of ApoA1 and FBN fragments by immunoblot was observed in 30/30 (100%) and 29/30 (96.6%) CD children, respectively. ApoA1 and FBN fragments were absent at the end of BZ treatment in 20/30 (66.6%) and 16/30 (53.3%) children, respectively. Absence of fragments in serum profiles was confirmed by mass spectrometry. Using intact protein analysis, a 28 109-Da protein identified as full-length ApoA1 by tandem mass spectrometry was detected in HC serum samples. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that ApoA1 and FBN fragments can discriminate between healthy and T. cruzi-infected samples. Correlation with seroreversion was shown for the first time; results suggest predictive capacity potentially superior to serology, making them potentially useful as surrogate biomarkers.

Review of Chlamydia trachomatis viability methods: assessing the clinical diagnostic impact of NAAT positive results.

INTRODUCTION: Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) is the most commonly diagnosed bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. The advancement of molecular techniques has made chlamydia diagnostics infinitely easier. However, molecular techniques lack the information on chlamydia viability. Where in routine diagnostics the detection of chlamydia DNA or RNA might suffice, in other patient scenarios, information on the viability of chlamydia might be essential. Areas covered: In this review, the authors discuss the specific strengths and limitations of currently available methods to evaluate chlamydia viability: conventional cell culture, messenger RNA (mRNA) detection and viability-PCR (V-PCR). PubMed and Google Scholar were searched with the following terms: Chlamydia trachomatis, Treatment failure, Anal chlamydia, Microbial viability, Culture, Viability-PCR, Messenger RNA, and Molecular diagnostics Expert commentary: Several techniques are currently available to determine chlamydia viability and thus the clinical relevance of a positive test result in clinical samples. Depending on the underlying research question, all three discussed techniques have their merits when testing for viability. However, mRNA methods show the most promise in determining the presence of a true infection, in case the chlamydia reticulate body can be specifically detected. Further research is needed to understand how to best apply viability testing in current chlamydia diagnostics.

Role of HPV DNA testing in modern gynaecological practice.

The identification of some types of human papillomavirus (HPV) as necessary, but not sufficient, cause of cervical cancer has suggested the use of HPV testing in cervical cancer prevention. A large number of studies has provided evidence supporting its application (1) as primary screening test, (2) for triaging borderline cytology, (3) for follow-up after positive primary test but no abnormal histology and (4) as a test of cure. They also allowed a reasonably good definition of the appropriate policies and protocols, leading to the delivery of evidence-based guidelines resulting from a systematic review of the literature. In this chapter, we present a critical analysis of the recommendations of the main European and North American guidelines relative to industrialised countries.

A recommendation for timing of repeat Chlamydia trachomatis test following infection and treatment in pregnant and nonpregnant women.

The objective of this study was to describe the time required to obtain a negative chlamydia test in pregnant and nonpregnant women following treatment to inform test-of-cure collection and recommend an abstinence period to avoid reinfection. Seventy-two women with Chlamydia trachomatis infection, 36 pregnant and 36 nonpregnant, were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Women were excluded less than 18 years of age, if they had been treated for chlamydia, reported an allergy to macrolide antibiotics, or if they had Myasthenia Gravis. Women were treated for chlamydia with single-dose therapy and submitted weekly vaginal chlamydia nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Once NAAT were negative, the participants completed the study. Forty-seven women completed the study per protocol. The primary outcome was to determine the time to a negative chlamydia NAAT following treatment, with secondary outcomes of determining the appropriate time to collect a test-of-cure following chlamydia treatment and to recommend an appropriate abstinence period following treatment to avoid reinfection. Results showed that the time to a negative chlamydia NAAT was significantly different between groups (log-rank p = 0.0013). The median number of days to obtain a negative chlamydia NAAT was 8 days (IQR 7-14) in pregnant and 7 days (IQR 6-10) in nonpregnant women (WRST p = 0.04). All participants had a negative chlamydia NAAT by day 29 post-treatment. Following single-dose treatment for chlamydia, both pregnant and nonpregnant women should test negative with NAAT by 30 days post-treatment. Clinicians should collect a test-of-cure in pregnant women no earlier than 1 month. To avoid reinfection, women should avoid condomless intercourse for at least 1 month.

Time to clearance of Chlamydia trachomatis RNA and DNA after treatment in patients coinfected with Neisseria gonorrhoeae - a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Performing a test of cure (TOC) could demonstrate success or failure of antimicrobial treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection, but recommendations for the timing of a TOC using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are inconsistent. We assessed time to clearance of C. trachomatis after treatment, using modern RNA- and DNA-based NAATs. METHODS: We analysed data from patients with a C. trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae coinfection who visited the STI Clinic Amsterdam, The Netherlands, from March through October 2014. After treatment with ceftriaxone plus either azithromycin or doxycycline, patients self-collected anal, vaginal or urine samples during 28 consecutive days. Samples were analysed using an RNA-based NAAT (Aptima Combo 2) and a DNA-based NAAT (Cobas 4800 CT/NG). We defined clearance as three consecutive negative results, and defined "blips" as isolated positive results following clearance. RESULTS: We included 23 patients with C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae coinfection. All patients cleared C. trachomatis during follow-up, and we observed no reinfections. The median time to clearance (range) was 7 days (1-13) for RNA, and 6 days (1-15) for DNA. Ninety-five per cent of patients cleared RNA at day 13, and DNA at day 14. The risk of a blip after clearance was 4.4 % (RNA) and 1.7 % (DNA). CONCLUSIONS: If a TOC for anogenital chlamydia is indicated, we recommend performing it at least 14 days after initiation of treatment, when using modern RNA- and DNA-based assays. A positive result shortly after 14 days probably indicates a blip, rather than a treatment failure or a reinfection.

Colposcopists' experiences of HPV Test of Cure for the follow up of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To survey lead colposcopists in England to explore their views on the recently introduced HPV Test of Cure (TOC) following treatment for cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) and to determine the extent to which it has impacted their clinical practice and affected their patients. METHODS: An online survey was sent to lead colposcopists across England. Questions were asked focusing on the clinicians' confidence in the ability of TOC to guide follow up in various clinical scenarios and how the implementation of TOC had changed patient management. RESULTS: There was a 50% (N=88) response rate. 90% of respondents indicated they were happy with the new procedure. In the follow-up questions, 20% indicated they were uncomfortable with the procedure when it was applied to women who were CIN2+ with incomplete excision at the endocervical margin. Open-ended questions elicited positive aspects of TOC including reduced follow-up, increased reassurance for patients and clinicians and a faster return to the call-recall system. Negative observations included concerns around HPV positive cases, possible false negatives and anxiety in those women who were originally subject to the pre-TOC guidelines and were now returned to call-recall "earlier" than originally indicated to them. 11% of respondents also indicated they work around the new guidelines to some extent. CONCLUSION: Although clinicians are on the whole positive towards the introduction of TOC, concerns were raised which centre primarily around those patients with CIN2+ combined with positive endocervical margins, issues related to HPV positive cases and the possibility of a false negative HPV result. The possibility of patient anxiety due to return to routine screening earlier than originally expected was also identified as a concern.

Test of Cure for Anogenital Gonorrhoea Using Modern RNA-Based and DNA-Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The use of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to diagnose Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections complicates the performance of a test of cure (TOC) to monitor treatment failure, if this is indicated. As evidence for the timing of TOC using modern NAATs is limited, we performed a prospective cohort study to assess time to clearance when using modern RNA- and DNA-based NAATs. METHODS: We included patients with anogenital gonorrhoea visiting the Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic Amsterdam from March through October 2014. After treatment with ceftriaxone mono- or dual therapy (with azithromycin or doxycycline), anal, vaginal, or urine samples were self-collected during 28 consecutive days, and analyzed using an RNA-based NAAT (Aptima Combo 2) and a DNA-based NAAT (Cobas 4800). Clearance was defined as 3 consecutive negative results, and blips as isolated positive results following clearance. RESULTS: We included 77 patients; 5 self-cleared gonorrhoea before treatment and 10 were lost to follow-up. Clearance rate of the remaining 62 patients was 100%. Median time to clearance was 2 days, with a range of 1-7 days for RNA-based NAAT and 1-15 days for DNA-based NAAT. The risk of finding a blip after clearance was 0.8% and 1.5%, respectively. One patient had a reinfection. CONCLUSIONS: If indicated, we recommend that TOC be performed for anogenital gonorrhoea at least 7 or 14 days after administering therapy, when using modern RNA- or DNA-based NAATs, respectively. When interpreting TOC results for possible treatment failure, both the occurrence of blips and a possible reinfection need to be taken into account.

A re-audit of the management of gonorrhoea.

A re-audit of the management of gonorrhoea was undertaken in 2014. Six out of nine auditable outcomes were met in the second audit (2014) compared with three out of eight in the first audit (2012). The new measures that were introduced following the original audit may have helped to improve outcomes. However, electronic patient records were introduced in December 2012. Documentation was much improved with the use of patient record templates and this has contributed considerably to the improved outcomes.