RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Placenta previa-accreta spectrum disorders are a cause of obstetric hemorrhage that can lead to maternal fetal mortality and morbidity. We aimed to describe the use of a uterine isthmic tourniquet left in situ as a new uterus-preserving approach for patients with placenta previa-accreta. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, the patients who underwent surgery for placenta previa between 2017 and 2024 at our tertiary hospital were reviewed. Primary outcome of the study is to evaluate feasibility of uterine isthmic tourniquet left in situ for uterine preserving by preventing postpartum hemorrhage for patients with placenta previa-accreta. As a secondary outcome, group 1 (n=28) patients who were managed with uterine isthmic tourniquet left in place were compared with patients in group 2 (n=32) who were managed with only bilateral uterine artery ligation. RESULTS: This new approach uterine isthmic tourniquet technique prevented postpartum hemorrhage with a rate of 100 percent in group 1 patients, while uterine artery ligation prevented postpartum hemorrhage with a rate of 75â¯% in group 2. Postoperative additional interventions (relaparotomy hysterectomy, balloon tamponade application, uterine or vaginal packing) were performed for eight patients in group 2 (25â¯%) but not in group 1 (0â¯%) (p=0.015). The haemoglobin levels before caesarean section were similar in both groups (p=0.235), while the postoperative haemoglobin levels were lower in group 2 (9.69 ± 1.37 vs. 8.15 ± 1.32) (p=0.004). Erythrocyte suspension was given to two patients in group 1 and 12 patients in group 2 (2/28 7â¯% vs. 12/32 37â¯%, p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The uterine isthmic tourniquet left in situ technique is a safe, simple and effective for preventing postpartum hemorrhage and preserving uterus during placenta previa accreta surgery as superior to uterine artery ligation alone.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Increasingly, medical schools integrate clinical skills into early didactic coursework. The Stop the Bleed® Campaign emphasizes prehospital hemorrhage control to reduce preventable deaths; however, this course overlooks team interactions. We assessed the impact of high-fidelity simulation during medical student orientation on identification and treatment of life-threatening hemorrhage in a team setting. DESIGN: In this mixed method, prospective pre-, post-, and follow-up survey analysis assessing student knowledge and attitudes, student teams encountered a standardized patient in a prehospital environment with pulsatile bleeding from an extremity wound. Individual students completed surveys assessing previous experience, willingness and ability to assist bleeding person(s), and knowledge and attitudes about tourniquets. Postscenario, faculty preceptors made qualitative observations on teamwork. SETTING: Medical student orientation at a tertiary care academic medical center with long-term follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students (Nâ¯=â¯150). RESULTS: Ninety students (60%) completed both pre- and postsimulation questionnaires. Sixteen (17%) students had previous tourniquet training experience although none had applied a tourniquet outside of training. Postsimulation, students reported increased likelihood of providing treatment until additional help arrived (pâ¯=â¯0.035), improved ability to identify life-threatening hemorrhage (p < 0.001), and more favorable opinions about tourniquet use (p < 0.001) and potential for limb-salvage (pâ¯=â¯0.018). Long-term follow-up respondents (nâ¯=â¯34, 23%) reported increased ability to identify life-threatening hemorrhage (pâ¯=â¯0.010) and universal willingness to intervene until additional help arrived. Follow-up survey responses elicited themes in hemorrhage control including recognition of the importance of continuous pressure, appropriate use of tourniquets, a desire for repeated team training, and the recognition of clerkship rotations as an optimal setting for skill reinforcement. Preceptors noted variable team responses but uniformly endorsed the exercise. CONCLUSIONS: High-fidelity bleeding simulation during medical student orientation improved students' knowledge and attitudes about treating life-threatening hemorrhage and served as an introduction to team-based emergency care. Future studies should further explore team training and hemorrhage control education.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tourniquet is applied in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce intraoperative blood loss and improve view of surgical field. However, tourniquet use in TKA is still in dispute. Some researchers find that tourniquet may lead to extra side effects such as aggravated pain and limb swelling, while others consider that tourniquet has no significant adverse impact on clinical outcomes of TKA patients. This trial is conducted to evaluate tourniquet effect on TKA patients. METHODS: A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trail is adopted with a sample size of 130 knees from August 2020 to February 2023. Patients undergoing TKA are randomly allocated to tourniquet group and non-tourniquet group. Outcomes including quadriceps thickness and stiffness, operation time, total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, thigh circumference, knee and thigh VAS, D-Dimer and CRP level, knee function score, patient satisfaction, and complications are evaluated in this trial. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test are used in this study. RESULTS: No significant difference in demographic information and baseline outcomes were found (p > 0.05). Participants in the tourniquet group had significantly less total blood loss and intraoperative blood loss, more postoperative blood loss, and higher D-Dimer level on postoperative day 3 when compared with non-tourniquet group (p < 0.05). Other outcomes including quadriceps thickness and stiffness, operation time, postoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, thigh circumference, knee and thigh VAS, D-Dimer level on postoperative day 1, CRP level, knee function score, patient satisfaction, and complications showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tourniquet application can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss and total blood loss, without significant side effects. Hence, we advocate the regular use of tourniquet in primary TKA.
RESUMO
Purpose: To identify the effect of releasing a tourniquet before versus after wound closure in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on blood loss, functional outcome and postoperative complications. Methodology: A prospective cohort study was conducted including 53 patients from May 2023 to September 2023. All patients underwent unilateral TKA and were divided into two groups based on surgeon preference of deflating tourniquet, Group A consisted of patients in whom the tourniquet was deflated before wound closure for haemostasis and Group B consisted of patients in which tourniquet was deflated after wound closure and compressive dressing. Blood loss was evaluated via intraoperative blood loss (the number of soaked sponges/gauzes, blood in a suction bottle, total output in a suction bottle-irrigation used) and on-field blood loss and calculated blood loss (Using Gross and Meunier's formula). The Functional outcome was evaluated using Knee injury and osteoarthritis score-42 questions. Early postoperative complications and differences in the requirement of blood transfusions were also assessed. Results: There was a significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. The median intraoperative blood loss was 135 mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 90-149) in Group A and 56.2 mL (IQR: 45-68) in Group B (p value: 0.001). However, no difference was found between the groups in calculated blood loss using Gross and Meunier's formula. The median calculated blood loss was 439 mL (IQR: 450-813) in Group A and 508 mL (IQR: 226-671) in group B (p value: 0.981). There was no significant difference between the groups in blood transfusion requirements or functional outcomes. Conclusion: Based on our results, we conclude that the intraoperative blood loss in TKA is significantly different between the groups but only represents a fraction of true blood loss (23%). The timing of releasing the tourniquet does not affect functional outcomes, blood transfusion and postoperative morbidity; hence, any time can be opted as per surgeon preference. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.
RESUMO
Introduction: There is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding the clinical utility of tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), specifically in regards to perioperative blood loss. In this meta-analysis and systematic review, we aim to evaluate the clinical advantages and disadvantages associated with tourniquet use in the setting of TKA. Methods: A systematic review was conducted through April 2017 using keywords: "tourniquet" and "total knee arthroplasty" or "total knee replacement". Perioperative variables including TXA use, blood loss, incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and wound complications were either extracted from the studies or corresponding authors were contacted. A sub-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of TXA on intraoperative and total blood loss (TBL), and VTE incidence. Results: After review of 558 articles, 19 studies reporting outcomes in 1094 patients were analyzed. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the tourniquet cohorts compared to non-tourniquet (p < 0.01). TBL was reduced in tourniquet groups but not significantly (p = 0.08). In contrast, calculated blood loss was greater in tourniquet groups, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.43). There was a greater likelihood for wound complications and VTE among tourniquet assisted TKA, albeit only significant for the former (p = 0.01). TXA sub-analysis demonstrated intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced with tourniquet use regardless of TXA implementation (p < 0.01). In studies without TXA, tourniquet patients were at greater risk of developing VTE (p = 0.08). These risks decreased with TXA administration. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that tourniquets prevent intraoperative blood loss, yet within the postoperative period, there is no significant difference in TBL between tourniquet and non-tourniquet assisted TKA. Level of evidence: Level II; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the detailed surgical procedure for open-chest CPR (OC-CPR) through a transdiaphragmatic (TD) approach during planned laparotomy and to evaluate the procedure time and damage to organs. ANIMALS: 7 mixed-breed canine cadavers. METHODS: The procedure was divided into 3 stages. Durations for each of the 3 stages of the procedure and total time from diaphragmatic incision to the end of Rumel tourniquet application were recorded. Subjective assessment of ease of procedures and postprocedural physical evaluation of thoracoabdominal organs were also performed. RESULTS: Mean time from diaphragmatic incision to pericardiotomy was 15.1 seconds (SD, 4.0). Performing 10 cardiac compressions took 12.0 seconds (SD, 1.8). Dissection of the aorta and application of a Rumel tourniquet took 130.4 seconds (SD, 52.2). The mean total time from start of first procedure to end of last procedure was 157.6 seconds (SD, 21.5). The mean length of diaphragmatic incision was 11.5 cm (SD, 2.2). Lung laceration was identified in one dog, and liver laceration was identified in another dog. The mean ease of pericardiotomy was 10, and application of a Rumel tourniquet was 4 (SD, 1.9). There was no instance of abdominal organs moving into the thoracic cavity during the procedure in any of the dogs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Resuscitation techniques during TD OC-CPR can be performed with acceptable timing and effort, except for aortic Rumel tourniquet application, which was difficult and time consuming. Avoidable damage to thoracoabdominal organs can occur.
RESUMO
There is controversy in the literature on where to place the tourniquet (thigh, calf, ankle) for foot and ankle surgery. While some authors prefer the ankle tourniquet to the calf tourniquet, others state that the surgeon can decide between using the thigh tourniquet or the ankle tourniquet, since there was no difference in postoperative pain between them. Where to place the tourniquet during foot and ankle surgery to cause the least possible postoperative pain to the patient as a result of the tourniquet is a common question in clinical practice. The reality is that, unfortunately, there is no consensus on this issue. Perhaps the only possible way to answer this question would be to conduct a comparative study with sufficient statistical power to reach scientifically sound conclusions. It does not seem easy to carry out such a study, but it would be important to be able to answer the question posed in the title of this Editorial once and for all.
RESUMO
Background: This study aims to systematically compare the efficacy of two distinct approaches that is limb occlusion pressure (LOP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in determining the optimal tourniquet pressure for primary total knee arthroplasty. The overarching goal is to identify the method that yields superior outcomes in minimizing post-operative thigh pain while simultaneously reducing complications in our patient population. Methods: 311 patients scheduled for primary total knee replacement (TKR) were randomized in two groups. Group A (LOP) had 154 patients and group B had 157 patients. In group A, LOP was determined for all patients. After adding the safety margin, the tourniquet pressure was determined which was kept during the procedure. By adding 150 mm Hg to SBP in group B, the tourniquet inflation pressure was ascertained. Postoperatively, thigh pain was evaluated from day 1 to day 3 and at 6 weeks. Results: The average tourniquet pressure in group A patients having thigh circumference between 40 and 50 cm was 223.8 mm + - 19.8 mm Hg and in group B it was 262.1 + - 15.9 mm Hg (P < .01). Patients having thigh circumference between 51 and 60 cm had average tourniquet pressure of 240.07 + - 20.1 mm Hg in group A and 264.5 + - 17.4 mm Hg in group B (P < .01). The average tourniquet pressure for patients with thigh circumference more than 60 cm was 296 + /15.3 mm Hg in group A and 267.3 + /19.2 mm Hg in group B (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Tourniquet pressure determination based on the limb occlusion pressure (LOP) method provide less postoperative thigh pain and better range of motion. Graphical Abstract: Optimizing Tourniquet Pressure in Primary Total Knee Replacement: Limb Occlusion Pressure vs Systolic blood pressure method to minimize thigh pain.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pneumatic tourniquets are frequently employed in extremity surgeries, aiming to enhance intraoperative visibility and minimize blood loss. While their benefits and drawbacks have been extensively studied in lower limb operations, their impact on upper limb procedures, particularly elbow surgery, remains poorly understood. This study investigates the advantages and risks associated with pneumatic tourniquet utilization in elbow surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 183 patients who underwent elbow surgery for fractures between January 2019 and September 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: those who underwent surgery with a tourniquet (WT) and those without a tourniquet (NT). Subgroup analyses were performed based on fracture complexity. Data collected included patient characteristics, tourniquet usage, surgical duration, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels, C-reactive protein levels, pain assessments, opioid administration, hospital stay duration, follow-up, complications, and revisions. Statistical analyses were used to identify significant differences and correlations. RESULTS: The use of a tourniquet in elbow surgery yielded several notable outcomes. Patients in the WT group experienced significantly shorter surgical durations and hospital stays. Hemoglobin drop was lower in the WT group, indicating reduced blood loss. However, there were no significant differences in postoperative pain, opioid consumption, or complications between the WT and NT groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that the recorded differences, particularly shorter surgical durations, were more pronounced in complex fractures. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows promising results in the use of pneumatic tourniquets in elbow surgery in terms of enhanced efficiency, reduced blood loss, and overall safety, without compromising patient outcomes. However, the potential influence of perioperative decision-making on tourniquet usage underscores the need for further research to elucidate its role and optimize its application, especially in complex elbow fractures.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Pneumatic tourniquets are among the most essential equipment for controlling bleeding in orthopedic surgeries. However, incorrect application of pneumatic tourniquets is accompanied by many hazards and complications for patients. Evaluation of surgical teams' use of pneumatic tourniquets and establishment of protocols can play an important role in improving patient safety, minimizing risks, and increasing the lifetime of this equipment. Accordingly, the present study was conducted to develop and assess the psychometric properties of a pneumatic tourniquet work standards scale. METHODS: The present study is a methodological work carried out in two stages. In the first stage, an initial version of the scale was developed based on existing research and panel reviews. In the second stage, the psychometric properties of the scale were tested in terms of face validity (measured qualitatively and quantitatively), content validity (measured qualitatively and quantitatively), item analysis, construct validity, and reliability (internal consistency and stability). RESULTS: The initial version of the scale consisted of 91 items. After several meetings of the research team, the number of items decreased to 81. In the course of face and content validity testing, 40 items were eliminated, leaving 41 items on the scale when it entered the construct validity testing stage. For evaluation of construct validity, a sample of 300 operating room nurses was recruited. The Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) results showed a structure supported by seven factors and 41 items. The reliability of the scale was confirmed by internal consistency analysis, with a good Cronbach's alpha (0.85), and test-retest analysis, with good values of ICC (0.95). CONCLUSION: The present instrument is a reliable and valid scale which fills the gap in assessment of surgical team members' use of pneumatic tourniquets. The developed scale can be employed by researchers and managers of medical centers to identify hazards in applying pneumatic tourniquets and devise educational programs to eliminate or reduce the existing issues.
Assuntos
Psicometria , Torniquetes , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Human hands have a complex anatomical structure. The thumb, being an integral part of the hand, has an essential function in gripping. In this sense, thumb fractures account for 4% of all hand fractures (it may occur in association with fractures of the trapezium). The majority of hand fractures should be treated non-surgically and surgeons must avoid unnecessary surgery. Historically, hand surgery has used a combination of local/regional/general anaesthesia and a tourniquet. This study aims to carry out a systematic review to determine whether the WALANT technique is an advantageous alternative to conventional anaesthesia for surgical procedures on thumb injuries, in terms of patient function and pain. METHOD: We conducted a search in the following databases: Pubmed/Medline, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar, using the equation "WALANT" OR "Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet" AND "thumb pathology". RESULTS: In five of the 584 articles included, two studied trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis, one De Quervain's disease and the remaining two flexor injuries. WALANT showed good results in active movements, but with similar levels of pain between anaesthetics. Patients were more anxious during general anaesthesia, plus the fact that they were fasting and suspending medication. CONCLUSION: WALANT is a convenient and favourable option in several studies. It has been demonstrated the benefits in terms of return to function and pain.
RESUMO
This study addresses the challenges faced by diabetic patients undergoing lower extremity amputation due to diabetic foot, particularly focusing on the implications for wound healing and early mortality. The wounds at the amputation stump may necessitate multiple surgical interventions. The aim is to identify prognostic factors associated with these outcomes, shedding light on the complexities surrounding the postamputation phase. A prospective study was conducted on 39 diabetic patients who underwent lower extremity amputation due to diabetic foot between 2021 and 2022. Comprehensive preoperative data, encompassing parameters such as blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, hemoglobin A1c, albumin, protein, transferrin, ferritin levels, age, gender, body mass index, smoking habits, dialysis, revascularization, duration of surgery, and the use of tourniquet during the procedure were meticulously recorded. Additionally, cognitive performance and depression status were assessed preoperatively using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), respectively. A follow-up period of 3 months postsurgery allowed for the comparison of patients who developed infections at the amputation stump with those who did not, as well as the distinction between patients who survived and those who succumbed to mortality. The study revealed that the use of a tourniquet during surgery significantly increased the risk of infection (p = .027), and higher BDI scores were associated with increased risks of both infection (AUC = 0.814) and mortality (AUC = 0.769), with cut-off scores of 24.0 and 23.5 predicting these outcomes with high sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Additionally, lower MMSE scores were associated with increased short-term postoperative mortality. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in parameters such as complete blood count, ESR, CRP, procalcitonin, HbA1c, albumin, total protein, transferrin, ferritin levels, age, gender, BMI, smoking, dialysis, revascularization, and surgery duration. This investigation highlights the significance of considering tourniquet usage during amputation, preoperative depression status, and cognitive function in patients who undergo amputation due to diabetic foot. The use of a tourniquet during surgery is a significant risk factor for infection, and elevated BDI scores are strong predictors of both infection and mortality in patients undergoing amputations. The findings underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary neuropsychiatric evaluation preoperatively to enhance patient care and outcomes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The widespread pre-hospital use of tourniquets, particularly in the upper limb, raises questions about associated morbidity, which has been little studied and may have serious consequences for functional prognosis. METHODS: A review of 9 patients was carried out, analyzing pre-hospital tourniquet use in terms of complications affecting recovery. RESULTS: There were serious complications: musculocutaneous nerve palsy in 1 patient, and compartment syndrome, rhabdomyolysis and ischemia-reperfusion syndrome in another. A role of prolonged pre-hospital tourniquet application in postoperative infection was also suspected in 2 patients. DISCUSSION: The risk-benefit ratio and indications for using a tourniquet on the upper limb in the pre-hospital setting need to be reconsidered.
RESUMO
Hair-thread tourniquet syndrome (HTTS) is an uncommon but preventable disorder in which a body appendage becomes constricted after becoming firmly wrapped by a hair or substance that resembles hair. The genitalia, fingers, and toes are typically affected. Prompt diagnosis and treatment by complete removal of the constricting agent are crucial for the preservation of the affected appendage. This narrative review article revisits HTTS in the context of the recent literature with the aim of raising healthcare professionals' awareness of this surgical emergency so that the condition can be prevented, correctly diagnosed, and treated early.
RESUMO
Lifeguards are the first responders to any type of aquatic incident, including rapid rescue situations such as boating and sporting accidents, animal bites/attacks, and cases involving massive bleeding. In their line of work, rescue boats such as Rescue Water Craft (RWC) are commonly utilized the aim of this study is to evaluate the time and technique of placing a tourniquet on the sled of an RWC navigating at full speed. METHODS: A randomized crossover study design was used with a sample of 44 lifeguards. The inclusion criteria required that participants be certified lifeguards with experience in RWC operations and possess knowledge of responding to massive bleeding. Two CAT tourniquet placement tests were performed. In the 1) Beach-Tourniquet (B-TQ) test: it was performed on land and in the 2) Rescue Water Craft-tourniquet (RWC-TQ) test, sailing at a cruising speed of 20 knots. The evaluation was recorded in a checklist on the steps and timing of the correct application TQ by direct observation by an expert instructor. RESULTS: The tourniquet placement on RWC was an average of 11 s slower than when placed on the beach (BT-TQ 35.7 ± 8.0 vs. 46.1 ± 10.9 s, p > 0.001). In the percentage analysis of the results on correct execution of the skills, higher values are obtained for the B-TQ test than in RWC-TQ in Distance to the wound (into 5-7 cm), band adjustment, checking the radial pulse and reporting the time of tourniquet placement (p > 0.005). CONCLUSION: The placement of a tourniquet on a RWC navigating at 20 knots is feasible, relatively quick, and technically well executed.
Assuntos
Estudos Cross-Over , Trabalho de Resgate , Torniquetes , Humanos , Trabalho de Resgate/métodos , Masculino , Adulto , Hemorragia/terapia , Feminino , Fatores de Tempo , Navios , Emergências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SocorristasRESUMO
Background: With a rise in mass casualty incidents, training in hemorrhage control using tourniquets has been championed as a basic-and lifesaving-procedure for bystanders and medical professionals alike. The current standard for training is in-person (IP) courses, which can be limited based on instructor availability. Virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated the potential to improve the accuracy of certain medical tasks but has not yet been developed for hemorrhage control. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a VR hemorrhage trainer in learner retention of tourniquet application when compared to traditional IP instructor teaching among a cohort of emergency medicine residents practicing in a Level I trauma center. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study of 53 emergency medicine residents at an inner-city program. Participants were randomly assigned to either the control or the VR group. On Day 0, all residents underwent a training session (IP vs. VR) for the proper, stepwise application of a tourniquet, as defined by the American College of Trauma Surgeons. Each participant was then assessed on the application of a tourniquet by a blinded instructor using the National Registry Hemorrhage Control Skills Lab rubric. After 3 months, each resident was reevaluated on the same rubric, with subsequent data analysis on successful tourniquet placement (measured as under 90 s) and time to completion. Results: Of the 53 participants, the IP training group had an initial pass rate of 97% (28/29) compared to 92% (22/24) in the VR group (p = 0.58). On retention testing, the IP training group had a pass rate of 95% (20/21) compared to 90% (18/20) in the VR group (p = 0.62). Stratifying the success of tourniquet placement by level of resident training did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences. Conclusions: In this pilot study of emergency medicine residents, we found no significant differences in successful hemorrhage control by tourniquet placement between those trained with VR compared to a traditional IP course among emergency medicine residents. While more studies with greater power are needed, the results suggest that VR may be a useful adjunct to traditional IP medical training.
RESUMO
Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet is named the WALANT technique. WALANT has had a major positive impact on cost, convenience, ecology, patient satisfaction, access to surgical care, and outcomes in hand surgery in the last 20 years. Safe and efficient application of the technique is based on two principles. The first principle is the tumescent injection of a large volume low concentration 0.25-1% lidocaine, with 1:100 000-1:400 000 epinephrine. The second principle of WALANT is that the proper injection should be almost painless, with the patient only feeling the first needle poke of a tiny 30G needle. This wide awake patient approach reduces pain, neuropraxia, and systemic side effects of sedation with preservation of motor control, thereby aiding balanced reconstruction in hand surgery.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tourniquets are common adjuncts in the operating theatre but can be associated with post-operative pain. This study was designed to compare what effect pre-tourniquet Esmarch bandage exsanguination has on pain, compared to pre-tourniquet exsanguination by elevation alone. METHODS: 52 volunteers (104 lower limbs) were included in this study with each volunteer acting as their own matched control. The primary outcome was patient reported pain, measured in both legs simultaneously using area under curve. Secondary outcomes were pain score during inflation and deflation, cumulative pain score, duration of recovery and blood pressure during testing. RESULTS: Pain after Esmarch was superior to elevation as measured by area under pain curve (68.9 SD 26.1 vs 77.2 SD 27.3, p = 0.0010), independent of leg dominance. Cumulative pain scores demonstrated the same superiority after inflation (50.7 SD 17.1 vs 52.9 SD 17.0, p = 0.026) but not after deflation (p = 0.59). Blood pressure was not significantly different. Time to full recovery of the lower limb was the same for both groups-7.6 min (SD 2.1 min, p = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Previous studies describe a positive effect on pain when Esmarch bandage was used prior to tourniquet inflation for upper limb. Our findings suggest the same benefit from Esmarch when it was used on lower limbs-particularly during inflation of tourniquet. In addition to pain profiles, surgeon preference and patient factors need to be considered when deciding between elevation and Esmarch bandage.
Assuntos
Extremidade Inferior , Dor Pós-Operatória , Torniquetes , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Exsanguinação/etiologia , Exsanguinação/terapia , Bandagens , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Medição da Dor/métodosRESUMO
For the ischemic preconditioning (IPC) intervention, the accuracy of the protocol is paramount for mediating its possible ergogenic effects. However, the lack of standardization and widespread use of arbitrary cuff pressures (ranging from 130 to >300 mmHg) have been predominantly observed, potentially affecting the results and compromising the reproducibility of findings. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine an appropriate cuff pressure during IPC. Seventeen healthy male participants were enrolled in the study. Anthropometric measurements were initially conducted, followed by systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements. Subsequently, we determined the individual thigh occlusion pressure (TOP) for the right leg using a hand-held Doppler device. Based on these findings, we developed an estimation equation for TOP, considering the current brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP) values. We then conducted a retrospective analysis of its capacity to mediate occlusion. We observed the ability to estimate TOP using the equation (p = 0.01; ES: 0.86), presenting ~6% superiority in absolute values for occlusion compared to direct measurement (TOP equation: 169.9 ± 9.1; TOP direct measured: 161.2 ± 11.1). However, TOP estimation was insufficient to produce complete occlusion in two out of 17 subjects (11.8%). In conclusion, the estimation of TOP incorporating SBP values may offer a valid and practical means for cuff administration during IPC protocols with potential to minimize adverse effects and maximize its positive effects.