Updated techniques and evidence for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), including fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB), has revolutionized specimen collection from intra-abdominal organs, especially the pancreas. Advances in personalized medicine and more precise treatment have increased demands to collect specimens with higher cell counts, while preserving tissue structure, leading to the development of EUS-FNB needles. EUS-FNB has generally replaced EUS-FNA as the procedure of choice for EUS-TA of pancreatic cancer. Various techniques have been tested for their ability to enhance the diagnostic performance of EUS-TA, including multiple methods of sampling at the time of puncture, on-site specimen evaluation, and specimen processing. In addition, advances in next-generation sequencing have made comprehensive genomic profiling of EUS-TA samples feasible in routine clinical practice. The present review describes updates in EUS-TA sampling techniques of pancreatic lesions, as well as methods for their evaluation.

Abdominal Wall Needle Tract Seeding: 15 Years After a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Biopsy.

Percutaneous liver biopsy, although considered a safe procedure, can lead to tumoral needle tract seeding. We describe a case of a 65-year-old woman with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who presented with a painless abdominal lump 15 years post-liver biopsy and left hepatectomy. An MRI revealed an abdominal wall mass suggestive of HCC metastasis from needle tract seeding. Surgical removal confirmed a well-differentiated HCC. Distinctive imaging features of HCC in specific clinical settings reduce the need for biopsy, which should be limited to exceptional cases.

Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition on prognosis and peritoneal lavage cytology in resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) on the prognosis and incidence of positive peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) during laparotomy or staging laparoscopy in patients with resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with body and tail PDAC with/without EUS-TA at our hospital from January 2006 to December 2021. RESULTS: To examine the effect of EUS-TA on prognosis, 153 patients (122 in the EUS-TA group, 31 in the non-EUS-TA group) were analyzed. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the EUS-TA and non-EUS-TA groups after PDAC resection (P = 0.777). In univariate and multivariate analysis, preoperative EUS-TA was not identified as an independent factor related to overall survival after pancreatectomy [hazard ratio 0.96, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.70, P = 0.897]. Next, to examine the direct influence of EUS-TA on the results of PLC, 114 patients (83 in the EUS-TA group and 31 in the non-EUS-TA group) were analyzed. Preoperative EUS-TA was not statistically associated with positive PLC (odds ratio 0.73, 95 % CI 0.25-2.20, P = 0.583). After propensity score matching, overall survival and positive PLC were the same in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TA had no negative impact on postoperative survival and PLC-positive rates in R/BR PDAC.

A case of needle tract seeding with endoscopic findings of progression over time.

An 83-year-old male underwent three transgastric punctures with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the examination of a pancreatic body tumor. After a diagnosis of resectable pancreatic cancer and undergoing distal pancreatectomy, the patient was administered postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with oral S-1 for 6 months, and carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were bimonthly evaluated. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels continually increased to 4638.1 U/mL at 45 months post-fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided showed a 25 mm low-echoic, irregularly shaped, and heterogeneous tumor with clear margins protruding from the mucosa outside the gastric wall, and biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma. Since the immunostaining findings of the specimen matched those of the previously resected specimen, needle tract seeding (NTS) due to puncture of the pancreatic cancer was identified as the cause. After a pylorus-preserving gastrectomy at 46 months post-fine-needle aspiration, postoperative chemotherapy initiation, comprising gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, was initiated; however, the patient died despite these interventions as he developed multiple peritoneal dissemination. Although rare, the incidence of NTS will increase in the future owing to the expected extended survival in post-pancreatic cancer resection cases. We suggest regular upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided evaluations for patients who are at risk for NTS can facilitate early detection. Furthermore, it is extremely relevant to share experiences of encountered NTS cases in practice and extend knowledge of its varying endoscopic appearances.

What is the association of preoperative biopsy with recurrence and survival in retroperitoneal sarcoma? A systematic review by the Australia and New Zealand Sarcoma Association clinical practice guidelines working party.

Preoperative biopsy for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) enables appropriate multidisciplinary treatment planning. A systematic review of literature from 1990 to June 2022 was conducted using the population, intervention, comparison and outcome model to evaluate the local recurrence and overall survival of preoperative biopsy compared to those that had not. Of 3192 studies screened, five retrospective cohort studies were identified. Three reported on biopsy needle tract seeding, with only one study reporting biopsy site recurrence of 2 %. Two found no significant difference in local recurrence and one found higher 5-year local recurrence rates in those who had not been biopsied. Three studies reported overall survival, including one with propensity matching, did not show a difference in overall survival. In conclusion, preoperative core needle biopsy of RPS is not associated with increased local recurrence or adverse survival outcomes.

Does an excision of needle bone biopsy tract affect the prognosis in patients with primary bone tumor?

Background: Opinion remains divided as to whether excision of needle biopsy tract is beneficial and affect the prognosis. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes in patients of primary malignant bone tumor who had undergone surgery with or without biopsy tract excision. Methods: From January 2017 to June 2020, 240 patients with primary malignant bone tumors who underwent percutaneous needle biopsy followed by surgery were included. We categorized patients into Biopsy tract excision (Group1:185 patients) and Non Biopsy tract excision (Group 2:55 patients). Median follow-up of patients was 58.6 months (range; 12-61.8months). Results: Demographics, histopathological type, tumor location, type of surgery were similar in biopsy tract excision and non excision group. We found biopsy tract seeding in two cases out of 185 (1.1 %). Local recurrence in biopsy tract excision and non excision group was observed in 3.2 % and 1.8 % respectively with p value 0.58. The mean local recurrence free survival rate in group 1 and 2 was 60 and 44 months respectively. Limb salvage was performed in 71.6 % and in amputation in 28.3 % cases. The local recurrence in limb-salvage and amputation group was observed in 3.4 % (6/172) and 1.4 % (1/68) respectively. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the rate of local recurrence between patients who were treated by biopsy tract excision or non tract excision. Percutenous needle bone biopsy tract leads to minimal risk of tumor seeding during surgical resection of primary bone tumors.We recommend the further multi centre studies with more number of patients to reach a consensus on resection of needle biopsy tract during surgical management of primary bone tumors.

Tract seeding in indwelling pleural catheter placement for the drainage of malignant pleural effusions: Incidence and related clinical and imaging factors.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of tract seeding after the placement of indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) for malignant pleural effusion drainage has been variable in the literature. RESEARCH QUESTION: To evaluate the incidence of IPC-related cancer tract seeding and find out related demographic, clinical or imaging factors to the tract seeding. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 124 consecutive patients seen between January 2011 and December 2021 who underwent IPC placement for malignant pleural effusion drainage. Chest radiographs before IPC placement and serial chest CT studies were obtained. One patient was diagnosed pathologically, and the other patients were diagnosed as tract seeding radiologically. The incidence of and related factors to tract seeding were assessed by reviewing medical records and imaging studies. RESULTS: The incidence of IPC tract seeding was 21.7% (27 of 124 malignant effusions). Of 27 patients, 15 had primary lung cancer and remaining 12 had extra-thoracic malignancy. Adenocarcinoma (19 of 27, 70.3%) either from the lung (N = 12) or extra-thoracic malignancy (N = 7) was the most common cell type. Mean time elapsed until tract seeding occurrence after IPC placement was 96 days (ranges; 28-306 days). The survival in seeding group after IPC placement was 185 days (ranges, 32-457 days). On odd ratio analysis, the presence of mediastinal pleural thickening (OR [95% CI]; 9.79 (2.67-35.84), p = 0.001) was significantly related to the occurrence of tract seeding. Neither tumor volume within pleural space (p = 0.168), duration of IPC indwelling (p = 0.142), days of survival after IPC placement (p = 0.26), nor pleural effusion amount (p = 0.481) was related to the tract seeding. INTERPRETATION: IPC tract seeding is seen in 27 (21.7%) of 124 malignant pleural effusion patients, particularly with adenocarcinoma cytology. CT features of mediastinal pleural thickening are related to the occurrence of tract seeding.

Needle tract seeding of a sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma in a biopsy tract: a case report.

BACKGROUND: A sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF) is an uncommon tumor of the deep soft tissue. An SEF has been described as a low-grade tumor with high local recurrence and metastatic rates. Generally, in bone and soft tissue tumors, a resection of the biopsy route is recommended; however, there is limited evidence with respect to the dissemination of the tumor tissue during a needle biopsy. CASE PRESENTATION: A mass in the right pelvic cavity, with no symptoms, was observed in a 45-year-old woman during a gynecological examination. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a multilocular mass with calcification in the pelvic cavity. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an iso-signal intensity on T1 weighted images and hypo- and iso-signal intensity on T2 weighted images. The CT-guided core needle biopsy was performed using a dorsal approach, and the biopsy diagnosis was a low-grade spindle cell tumor. The tumor was excised using an anterior approach. The tumor tissue comprised spindle cells and epithelioid cells with irregular nuclei, and the immunohistological analysis was positive for vimentin and epithelial membrane antigen, which was consistent with a diagnosis of sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. Five years after the surgery, the MRI showed a tumor recurrence in the subcutaneous tissue of the right buttock, which was consistent with the needle biopsy tract. The patient underwent a tumor excision, and the resected tumor was similar to the primary tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The recurrent tumor was excised with a surgical margin, and the tumor specimen had the histological features of a sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. It was difficult to investigate the association of the core needle biopsy with the tumor recurrence because the approach of the biopsy tract is usually same as that used in a tumor excision. However, the present case indicated the tumor may recur in the biopsy tract of a soft tissue sarcoma. Surgeons should be aware of the possibility of disseminating tumor tissues in a needle biopsy.

FNAC Track Seeding in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Rare Complication.

We report the case of a female in her 50's with slowly progressive neck mass for 9 years. For last 2 years the mass has rapidly grown to present size. The size of the mass was 5 × 6 cm and underwent fine needle aspiration cytology six months earlier. Histopathological studies confirmed papillary thyroid carcinoma and cutaneous needle track seeding of the primary tumour. To our knowledge, this is a rare report of seeding of papillary thyroid carcinoma along the track of fine needle aspiration. Some factors involved in needle track seeding are: needle size; number of passes; withdrawing the needle without releasing suction; injecting the tumour at time of biopsy.

A case of needle tract seeding that seemed to be caused by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.

A 66-year-old man underwent a single endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) session and distal pancreatectomy for the pancreatic body adenocarcinoma measuring 12 mm in diameter. At 3 years after surgery, we diagnosed needle tract seeding (NTS) and performed total gastrectomy. NTS can occur with small tumors or after a single session of EUS-FNA.

Local recurrence of breast cancer histologically resembling Paget disease presumably due to needle tract seeding: a case report.

Seeding of cancer cells along the needle tract during core needle biopsy is a well-known phenomenon, with a reported frequency of between 22 and 50% [Hoorntje et al. in Eur J Surg Oncol 30:520-525, 2004;Liebens et al. in Maturitas 62:113-123, 2009;Diaz et al. in AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1303-1313, 1999;]. Local recurrence due to needle tract seeding is rare because the immune system eliminates the cancer cells in most cases. In addition, most local recurrences due to needle tract seeding occur as invasive carcinoma after diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast or mucinous carcinoma, and needle tract seeding due to noninvasive carcinoma is uncommon. We herein report a rare case of local breast cancer recurrence histologically resembling Paget disease, presumably due to needle tract seeding after core needle biopsy for diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. After receiving a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ, the patient underwent skin-sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. The pathological study showed ER/PgR-negative ductal carcinoma in situ, and no postoperative radiation therapy or systemic therapy was administered. Six months after the surgery, the patient had a breast cancer recurrence histologically resembling Paget disease, presumably in the scar of her core needle biopsy. The pathological study showed Paget disease localized in the epidermis, no invasive carcinoma, and no lymph node metastasis. It was morphologically similar to the primary lesion and was diagnosed as a local recurrence due to needle tract seeding.

Gastric intramural metastasis caused by needle tract seeding after preoperative fine needle aspiration for pancreatic body cancer subsequently resected by total pancreatectomy: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been an increase in the number of reports of needle tract seeding (NTS) of tumor cells after a biopsy as one of the adverse events related to endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). In most of the previously reported cases of NTS in pancreatic cancer, distal pancreatectomy was performed as the initial surgery, following which metachronous metastasis was discovered in the gastric wall, whose localization matched the puncture route of the EUS-FNA. We report a case of early metastasis from pancreatic cancer in the gastric wall, which was postulated to be caused by NTS. Our patient underwent a total pancreatectomy (TP), and the NTS was resected synchronously. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old woman with a diagnosis of pancreatic head-body-tail cancer presented to our department for surgery. Transgastric EUS-FNA and biopsy established the histological diagnosis in her case. We administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to the patient and performed a TP. Histopathological and immunohistochemical examination subsequently confirmed the diagnosis of pT3N1aM1 pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its gastric metastasis, which was caused by NTS. It is postulated that the tumor cells of NTS had progressed to develop the metastatic lesion in the gastric wall during the NAC period. This was also resected during the initial surgery. The patient developed an early postoperative recurrence in the peritoneum 8 months after the surgery. CONCLUSION: In pancreatic head cancer cases, the puncture route is often included in the resection area of radical surgery, and NTS is seldom considered as a potential clinical problem. However, NTS can progress rapidly and may be associated with early recurrence of malignancy. Therefore, when transgastrointestinal puncture is performed for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, the treatment strategy should be established considering the potential development of NTS.

Percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors and the potential for needle tract seeding: technical considerations, current controversies, and outcomes.

Multidisciplinary communication and planning between the musculoskeletal radiologist and orthopedic oncologist are essential for proper biopsy planning when a primary musculoskeletal malignancy is suspected. Image-guided percutaneous biopsy allows for real-time visualization of the biopsy needle and surrounding structures, combining high diagnostic accuracy with safety and cost-effectiveness. However, determining a surgically optimal biopsy trajectory for a mass can be technically challenging due to critical surrounding anatomy or challenging needle approach angles. Inappropriately placed biopsies can have serious repercussions on patient function and oncological survival. The potential for needle tract seeding and local recurrence after biopsy of sarcoma has been central to the debate regarding the need for excision of the biopsy tract. This multidisciplinary review highlights current controversies in the field, including the issue of core needle biopsy tracts and their excision, technical considerations and advances in image-guidance in the setting of challenging biopsies, advances in histopathological diagnostics with implications for targeted therapy in sarcoma, as well as surgical and oncological outcomes after needle tract biopsy.

Needle-Tract Seeding of Pancreatic Cancer after EUS-FNA: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Discussion of Management.

Needle-tract seeding (NTS) has been sporadically reported as complication of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided aspiration (FNA) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the evidence of its treatment and outcome is sparse. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of EUS-FNA NTS cases of PDAC and analyzed their management and outcome. Up to September 2022, the search query retrieved forty-five cases plus an unpublished case from our center, for a total of forty-six; 43.6% were male, with a mean age of 68.6 years. Thirty-four patients (87.1%) underwent an initial surgical resection, with only 44.1% and 5.9% undergoing adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively, and 5.9% undergoing both. The NTS nodule was mostly located in the posterior gastric wall, developing at a median of 19 months after primary resection; 82.4% underwent surgical resection of the seeding, while for 17.6%, palliative chemotherapy treatment. Follow-up after NTS diagnosis and treatment was reported for only twenty-three patients: when NTS was treated with surgery, the median overall survival was 26.5 months compared to 15.5 if treated with radio/chemotherapy. NTS after EUS-FNA of PDAC occurs late and might be treated aggressively with good results. Interestingly, only a low number of patients developing NTS underwent chemotherapy for the primary cancer, suggesting its possible protective role.

Isolated Gastric Metastases of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma following Radical Resection-Impact of Endosonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Tract Seeding.

BACKGROUND: Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNA)-associated metachronous gastric seeding metastases (GSM) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represent a serious condition with insufficient evidence. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of PDAC resections with a curative-intent, proven pathological diagnosis of PDAC, preoperative EUS-FNA and post-resection follow-up of at least 60 months. The systematic literature search of published data was used for the GSM growth evaluation using Pearson correlation and the linear regression analyses. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria met 59/134 cases, 16 (27%) had retained needle tract (15 following distal pancreatectomy, 1 following pylorus-sparing head resection). In total, 3/16 cases (19%) developed identical solitary GSM (10-26th month following primary surgery) and were radically resected. A total of 30 published cases of PDAC GSM following EUS-FNA were identified. Lesion was resected in 20 distal pancreatectomy cases with complete information in 14 cases. A correlation between the metastasis size and time (r = 0.612) was proven. The regression coefficient b = 0.72 expresses the growth of 0.72 mm per month. CONCLUSIONS: The GSM represent a preventable and curable condition. A remarkably high number of GSM following EUS-FNA was identified, leading to follow-up recommendation of EUS-FNA sampled patients. Multimodal management (gastric resection, adjuvant chemotherapy) may prolong survival.

Needle tract seeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic tumors: A nationwide survey in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. The present study aimed to investigate the current status of needle tract seeding (NTS) after EUS-TA of pancreatic tumors based on a nationwide survey in Japan. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical resection of primary pancreatic tumors after EUS-TA performed between April 2010 and March 2018 were surveyed. The incidence rates of NTS were determined, and compared in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) and other tumors, and in patients who underwent transgastric and transduodenal EUS-TA of PDACs. The detailed features and prognosis of patients with NTS were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 12,109 patients underwent surgical resection of primary pancreatic tumors after EUS-TA. The overall incidence rate of NTS was 0.330%, and the NTS rate was significantly higher in patients with PDAC than in those with other tumors (0.409% vs. 0.071%, P=0.004). NTS was observed in 0.857% of patients who underwent transgastric EUS-TA, but in none of those who underwent transduodenal EUS-TA. Of the patients with NTS of PDACs, the median time from EUS-TA to occurrence of NTS and median patient survival were 19.3 and 44.7 months, respectively, with 97.4% of NTS located in the gastric wall and 65.8% of NTS resected. The patient survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent NTS resection than in those without NTS resection (P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: NTS appeared only after transgastric not after transduodenal EUS-TA. Careful follow-up provides an opportunity to remove localized NTS lesions by gastrectomy.

A Novel Biopsy Method Based on Bipolar Radiofrequency Biopsy Needles.

Modern oncology increasingly relies on pathological, molecular, and genomic assessments of biopsied tumor tissue. However, the concern for bleeding complication and malignant seeding severely hinders the application of the biopsy tumor. Here, we developed a 16 G biopsy needle to contain two electrodes insulated from each other and connect to an radiofrequency generator. For evaluating hemostatic efficacy, 50 rabbits were randomly divided into two groups: warfarinization and non-warfarinization group. Two liver biopsies and two splenic biopsies per animal were performed using a 16 G biopsy needle. Each group was further equally divided into five groups according to different hemostatic measures, including non-intervention, embolization using an absorbable gelatin sponge, and ablation by RF with three different needle temperatures (50°C, 70°C, and 90°C). Than, we used VX2 rabbit models (n = 25) and applied the five analogous biopsies to the tumor. The flush fluid from the biopsy needle underwent cytomorphological analysis. Our results that the groups using ablation by RF showed significantly less blood loss than the control group for liver and spleen in both groups (P < 0.001). After RF ablation, thermal coagulation of the tissue surrounding the needle tract was observed on both the macroscopic and histological level. Cytological smears showed that tumor cells were degenerated after RF at 70°C and 90°C. Our findings showed that bipolar RF biopsy needle is a promising tool for reducing hemorrhage after biopsy and avoiding implanting tumor cells in the tract.

Clinical dilemma of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a first-line procedure for definitive tissue diagnosis of pancreatic cancer because of its high accuracy and low complication rate. The overall sensitivity of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is approximately 90%; however, its diagnostic ability for small lesions (<10 mm) remains limited. Although EUS-FNA is a relatively safe procedure, with an overall morbidity of ≤2%, it should be noted that needle tract seeding (NTS) can occur after EUS-FNA, which may affect the patient prognosis negatively. In patients with resected pancreatic tumors, preoperative EUS-FNA is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative recurrence. However, NTS after EUS-FNA for resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer has been highlighted recently, particularly by Japanese endoscopists. Thus, the use of preoperative EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer has become a clinical dilemma that challenges gastroenterologists and must be carefully considered on a case-by-case basis by weighing the benefits and risks. This review summarizes the pros and cons of performing EUS-FNA in patients with resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer and provides valuable insight for gastroenterologists treating pancreatic cancer.

Subclinical Needle Tract Seeding by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Cancer.

A 77-year-old woman with epigastralgia was referred to our hospital. Abdominal computed tomography showed a hypointense mass in the pancreatic tail. Abdominal and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) showed a hypo-echoic mass, 25 × 25 mm in size, with pancreatic duct dilatation. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed to the mass through gastric posterior wall. Pathological examination showed atypical cells growing papillary or tubular fashion, leading to the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Under the preoperative diagnosis of T2N0M0 pancreatic cancer, the patient underwent distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Macroscopic view of the resected specimen showed a presumed puncture-induced pancreatic pseudocyst adjacent to the pancreas. Pathological examination showed well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and a pseudocyst with presumed migrated atypical cells in the pseudocyst wall. The patient recovered uneventfully and has been on outpatient follow-up with adjuvant TS-1 therapy. Optimal treatment of pancreatic cancer naturally needs preoperative definitive diagnosis more strictly than other solid malignancies due to its much higher operative harm to the patients. EUS-FNA is a safe and effective diagnostic method but needs careful attention to the needle tract seeding.