Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prev Vet Med ; 198: 105533, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34826733

RESUMO

Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) is a ubiquitous endemic disease in most bovine populations that causes a negative economic impact on cattle production systems. However, true herd and individual prevalence in Chile have not been estimated based on statistical and epidemiological considerations and uncertainty regarding the infection's extension at animal and herd levels. In addition, the risk factors that can influence how the infection has spread among the cattle premises have not been assessed yet. Therefore, the study aimed to estimate true herd and animal prevalence of active BVDV infection in pasture-based dairy herds and to evaluate risk factors potentially associated with the status of herds and the within-herd prevalence, using a Bayesian approach. A cross-sectional study was performed over a random stratified (proportional to herd size) sample of one-hundred and fifty dairy herds selected in Chile's two leading dairy regions (Region de Los Ríos and Region de Los Lagos). We obtained 12.311 blood samples from lactating cows, but 4.998 randomly selected samples were processed due to budget constraints. For estimating BVDV Herd Prevalence (HP), a herd was considered infected if at least one positive animal to Ag-ELISA was found. In addition, a survey was completed on each farm, aiming to collect information to assess the influence of some variables over the state of the herds; both estimations were obtained using a Bayesian approach. True herd prevalence and true individual prevalence of BVDV active infection were estimated at 77 % and 3.5 % respectively, no significant differences were found between characteristics like herd size, location, vaccination, etc. Open herds and herds that mix herd categories are more likely to have higher BVDV prevalence.


Assuntos
Doença das Mucosas por Vírus da Diarreia Viral Bovina , Doenças dos Bovinos , Vírus da Diarreia Viral Bovina , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais , Teorema de Bayes , Doença das Mucosas por Vírus da Diarreia Viral Bovina/epidemiologia , Bovinos , Doenças dos Bovinos/epidemiologia , Chile/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Diarreia/veterinária , Fazendas , Feminino , Lactação , Prevalência
2.
Microorganisms ; 9(9)2021 Aug 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34576711

RESUMO

In Ecuador, a national program for bovine brucellosis control has been in implementation since 2008. Given the costs, small- and medium-sized livestock holders are not completely committed to it. The objective of this study was to determine true prevalence (TP) of bovine brucellosis in small- and medium-sized herd populations, as well as the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the Rose Bengal (RB) test and the sero-agglutination test (SAT)-EDTA using a Bayesian approach. Between 2011 and 2016, 2733 cattle herds were visited, and 22,592 animal blood samples were taken in nineteen provinces on mainland Ecuador. Bayes-p and deviance information criterion (DIC) statistics were used to select models. Additionally, risk-factor analysis was used for herds according to their brucellosis test status. True prevalence (TP) in herds was estimated by pool testing. National seroprevalence of farms was 7.9% (95% CI: 6.79-9.03), and TP was 12.2% (95% CI: 7.8-17.9). Apparent prevalence (AP) in animals was 2.2% (95% CI: 1.82-2.67), and TP was 1.6% (95% CrI: 1.0-2.4). Similarly, the sensitivity of the RB was estimated at 64.6% (95% CrI: 42.6-85.3) and specificity at 98.9% (95% CrI: 98.6-99.0); for the SAT-EDTA test, sensitivity was 62.3% (95% CrI: 40.0-84.8) and 98.9% (95% CrI: 98.6-99.1) for specificity. Results of the two tests were highly correlated in infected and uninfected animals. Likewise, high spatial variation was observed, with the Coastal Region being the zone with the highest TP at 2.5%. (95% CrI: 1.3-3.8%) in individual animals and 28.2% (95% CI: 15.7-39.8) in herds. Risk factors include herd size, type of production (milk, beef, and mixed), abortions recorded, and vaccination. The results of this study serve to guide authorities to make decisions based on parallel testing at the beginning of a bovine brucellosis program for small livestock holders to increase sensitivity level of the screening tests in Ecuador.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA