Radiographic morphometry of the distal end radius in Anatolian population / Morfometría radiográfica del extremo distal del radio en la población de Anatolia

SUMMARY: Distal radius fractures are one of the most common orthopedic injuries encountered by orthopedic surgeons. Correction of dorsal tilt and radial height is essential to restore normal biomechanics of the wrist joint. Comprehensive knowledge of the morphometry of the distal radius of the local population becomes critical for the treating surgeon. This study aims to report the morphometry of the distal radius in the Anatolian population and compare it with similar studies in other races and humans. Radiographs of one hundred and twenty-four people were included in the study. Four radiological parameters were examined on all radiographs: radial height, radial tilt, ulnar variance, and palmar tilt. Radial tilt was 23.35°±1.96; palmar tilt was 15.7°±2,87 radial height (mm) was 10.55±4.34, ulnar variance (mm) was 0.32±1.79. The highest rate of negative ulnar variance was found. According to the study's results, reference data varying by race for anatomical fit should be considered in treating DER injuries.

Las fracturas de la parte distal del radio son probablemente las lesiones ortopédicas más comunes que encuentran los cirujanos ortopédicos. La corrección de la inclinación dorsal y la altura radial es esencial para restaurar la biomecánica normal de la articulación de la muñeca. El conocimiento integral de la morfometría del radio distal de la población local es importante para el cirujano tratante. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo reportar la morfometría de la parte rdistal del radio en la población de Anatolia y compararla con estudios similares en otras razas y humanos. Se incluyeron ciento veinticuatro radiografías simples consecutivas de la articulación de la muñeca. Se examinaron cuatro parámetros radiológicos: altura radial, inclinación radial, variación ulnar e inclinación palmar. El ángulo de inclinación radial fue de 23,35±1,96; el ángulo de inclinación palmar fue de 15,7±, la altura radial (mm) fue de 10,55±4,34, la varianza ulnar (mm) fue de 0,32±1,79. Se encontró la tasa más alta de varianza ulnar negativa (43,5%). Los resultados de este estudio deben tenerse en consideración al tratar fracturas de la parte distal del radio, con datos de referencia que varían según la raza para el ajuste anatómico.

Evaluation of ulnar variance on wrist MR imaging: is it a reliable measure?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if ulnar variance can be evaluated by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and if this measure can be used as a reliable indicator when correlated to the gold standard technique, conventional radiography (CR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January to July 2018, the MR images of 64 participants, comprising 66 wrists (mean age 34.9 years; 33 females; 31 males), were obtained. Among those, 29 were referred for evaluation of the wrist for different medical reasons and 35 were asymptomatic volunteers from our radiology group. All subjects had a plain radiography of the wrist in a posteroanterior view with a mean interval between images of 1 day. Local ethics committee approved the study and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Two musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated the images. Correlation coefficients and a linear regression model were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-observer analyses were performed for both diagnostic methods with results showing concordance (intra-observer: kappa score: MR 0.915/CR 0.931; p < 0.05; inter-observer: kappa score: MR 0.857/CR 0.931; p < 0.05). The intraclass correlations of MR and CR to evaluate agreement between the radiologists was slightly higher for radiologist #1 (0.771) than for radiologist #2 (0.659). A linear regression model showed good model fit indicating that MR does correlate with the ulnar variance as measured by CR (CR = 0.554 + 0.897 × MR, R2 = 0.665). CONCLUSION: Although CR is the gold standard method for the evaluation of ulnar variance, our study demonstrated that MR can be used as a reliable qualitative option.