Characterizing early postoperative changes in body composition in patients with secondary lymphedema after breast cancer surgery: potential screening indicators for preventive intervention.

[Purpose] To characterize changes in the body composition of individuals with secondary lymphedema that developed in the early postoperative period after breast cancer surgery, before the manifestation of volume increase in the affected limb, and to test its potential as a screening indicator for preventive intervention. [Participants and Methods] A total of 219 patients with breast cancer who underwent axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel lymph node biopsy were included in this study. Body composition (extracellular water content, extracellular water content ratio, low-frequency impedance value, and phase angle) was evaluated using bioelectrical impedance analysis before surgery and three and six months after surgery. Changes in the body composition of the affected limb over time were compared between the lymphedema- and non-lymphedema-affected groups. [Results] Sixteen patients who developed lymphedema six months after breast cancer treatment showed significant changes in all body composition parameters at three months postoperatively, compared to those who did not develop lymphedema. [Conclusion] In patients with upper extremity lymphedema that develops within six months after breast cancer surgery, increases in extracellular water content, extracellular water content ratio, low-frequency impedance, and phase angle may precede apparent volume increases. Our findings suggest the usefulness of these parameters as screening indicators for early treatment triaging.

LYMPH-Q translation, cultural adaptation and validation in Italian language: A prospective PROMs-based study on breast cancer-related arm lymphedema for patients' education.

BACKGROUND: Upper Extremity Lymphedema following oncological breast surgery affects not only the patient's physique, but also the patient's psychological sphere. One of the best known PROMs-based questionnaires for investigating the condition is the LYMPH-Q. The study aimed to perform the Italian translation and cultural adaptation of the LYMPH-Q and to assess if, independently from disease evolution, arm sleeve improves QoL in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Translation included 4 steps: Forward translation, Back translation, Back translation review and Patient interviews. The questionnaire was administered to 50 female patients older than 18 years of age with UEL who received a prescription for daily use of a compression sheath. A second administration took place 30 days after. Forty-four patients completed the study (Group 1: 26 patients with indication to use compression sleeve who wore it; Group 2:18 patients who despite the prescription did not want to wear it. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed with Prism 9 software. RESULTS: T-tests showed statistical significance for changes in "Symptoms," "Function," "Appearance" and "Psychological" scales. There were no statistically significant changes for "Information scale" in Group 1 and for all scales in Group 2. CONCLUSION: Data from this observational study show that HR-QOL analyzed from the patients' perspective also tends to improve in terms of symptoms, function, appearance, and psychological sphere in patients with BCRL when using a compression sheath. The Lymph-Q has proven to be a valuable ally of the physician attempting to improve treatment approaches for BCRL based not only on scientific evidence but also on PROMs.

Treatment of Lymphedema in Patients With Advanced Cancer Receiving Palliative Care: A Single-Center Experience.

Background: Lymphedema can develop during the progression of neoplastic diseases and is a devastating complication in patients with cancer receiving palliative care. This study aimed to investigate the course of treatment for lymphedema in patients receiving palliative care to assess posttreatment outcomes. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study reviewed the maintained database of patients with lymphedema who presented to our department from January 2015 through December 2022. A combination of skin care, compression therapy, and lymphaticovenular anastomosis was used to treat lymphedema in patients with cancer receiving palliative care. The upper or lower extremity lymphedema indices, calculated based on 5 upper or 4 lower extremity circumferences and body mass index, were compared at the first and last visits. Results: Of the 202 patients with lymphedema, 38 patients with 45 affected limbs (upper extremities: 11 patients, 12 limbs; lower extremities: 27 patients, 33 limbs) were included in the analysis. There were no significant changes in edema based on the upper or lower extremity lymphedema indices in the upper (P = .931) or lower extremities (P = .767) between the first and last visits. No pain relief was observed after the treatment. In the treatment differences, the rate of change in edema was -3.6 ± 10.8% for the compression garment and +5.7 ± 11.5% for the lymphaticovenular anastomosis, showing no significant difference (P = .157). Conclusions: All treatments had limited therapeutic effects, such as reduced edema and pain relief, and there were no significant differences between them.

Relationship Between Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis Outcomes and the Number and Types of Anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is the first-line treatment for lymphedema in many hospitals. However, many aspects of its effects remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze problems with regard to the relationship between lymphaticovenular anastomosis and outcomes of surgery for lymphedema in the upper and lower extremities. METHODS: Eighteen articles were selected for review. The following information was extracted from these articles as factors associated with LVA for lymphedema in the upper and lower extremities: number of cases, average patient age, mean number of bypasses, lymphedema stage, duration and type of lymphedema, anastomotic technique, follow-up period, type of scale, and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Upper extremity lymphedema: The average age of patients was 54.2 (range: 41.3-60.1) years. The mean number of anastomoses was 3.91 (range: 1.0-7.2). Six of nine articles provided data for volume change, and the mean volume change was 29% (-5%-50%). Lower extremity lymphedema: The average age of patients was 50.3 (range: 34-64 years). The mean number of anastomoses was 4.6 (range: 2.1-9.3). Comparison was difficult as different methods were used for postoperative evaluation (lower extremity lymphedema index in three patients, limb circumference in one, volume change in two, and restaging in three). CONCLUSIONS: We obtained useful information with regard to the effects of LVA in this review. An increased number of anastomoses between the lymphatic ducts and veins did not seem to improve the effectiveness of LVA. With regard to the stage of lymphedema, LVA may be useful for both early and advanced stages.

Shoulder arthroplasty in patients with upper extremity lymphedema may result in transient or permanent lymphedema worsening.

INTRODUCTION: Upper extremity lymphedema can complicate mastectomy, lymph node dissection, and radiation. The purpose of this study is to present the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in patients with lymphedema. METHODS: The 19 shoulders with a shoulder arthroplasty and lymphedema on the surgical side (6 anatomic, 12 reverse, 1 hemiarthroplasty) were followed for four years (1-10 years). There were 2 males and 17 females; average age was 67.8 (48-86) years. Breast carcinoma was the most common reason for lymphedema (75%). A dedicated lymphedema questionnaire could be completed for 14 shoulders. RESULTS: Pain improved from moderate or severe preoperatively to no or mild in 18 shoulders. Motion improved in elevation (55° preoperatively, 107° at last follow-up), external rotation (14°, 43°), and internal rotation (sacrum, L5). Complications included an acromion stress fracture with a deep infection (1), deep infection (1), superficial infection (1), and glenoid loosening (1). Lymphedema worsened in nine cases, but worsening was permanent in only four. Currently, lymphedema treatment is being performed by 93% of survey respondents. No patients reported lymphangitis or lymphangiosarcoma. CONCLUSION: Shoulder arthroplasty for an upper extremity with lymphedema provides substantial improvements in pain and motion; however, infection is a concerning complication. Fifty percent of the patients will experience worsening of their lymphedema and in 20% worsening may be permanent.

Role of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in the Evaluation of Patients with Upper Limb Lymphedema.

Background: Monofrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) protocols seek to further quantify changes in lymphedema compared with traditional circumferential evaluations. Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) is an effective method of reducing unilateral upper limb lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatments. Comparing lymphedema measurements between segmental tetrapolar BIA, total body BIA, and circumferential measurements during therapeutic changes can improve our quantitative assessment ability for this prevalent medical complication. Methods and Results: Twenty-two patients with breast-cancer-related unilateral upper limb lymphedema participated in this prospective observational study. Circumferential measurements, segmental tetrapolar BIA, and total body BIA were obtained and compared before CDT, immediately after 10 sessions of CDT, and 30 days post-CDT to assess lymphedema. The segmental tetrapolar BIA correlated well with improvements in circumferential measurements of the limb. We found that the resistance value cutoff point of 237 Ω could indicate a recurrence of lymphedema. Conclusions: Segmental, tetrapolar monofrequency BIA provides a simple method to monitor and evaluate the efficacy of therapy in the outpatient setting by operators with minimal training. This protocol could aid quantitative evaluations of unilateral upper limb lymphedema.

Topical Approach to Delivering Targeted Therapies in Lymphedema Treatment: A Systematic Review.

It is estimated that 140 to 200 million people are affected by lymphedema worldwide. Many studies have proposed targeted therapies that can be delivered systemically or locally to treat lymphedema. Since lymphedema primarily affects the skin and subcutaneous tissues, topical approaches to therapy should be considered as an attractive proposition as they can avoid systemic complications. In light of this, we conducted a systematic review of publications that analyzed the use of topical approaches to delivering targeted therapies in the treatment of lymphedema. We hypothesized that topical approaches resulted in the satisfactory treatment of lymphedema. We conducted a systematic review of publications on PubMed. The main eligibility criterion was that the articles should primarily investigate the use of topical approaches to delivering targeted therapies in the treatment of lymphedema. Consequently, we excluded papers that investigated any other delivery approaches or medical conditions. Of the 174 potential studies found in the literature, six were found to fulfill our eligibility criteria. All these studies were experimental ones on small animals (mice). The authors generally proposed different types of therapies, which could be clustered into two main groups: 1) induction of lymphangiogenesis [vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) hydrogel or fibroblast growth factor]; and 2) modulation of inflammation (tacrolimus or topical collagen gel or troxerutin-phosphatidylcholine). All studies presented positive outcomes, demonstrating that topical therapy is a promising route for delivering growth factors and anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment of lymphedema. However, studies were conducted under heterogeneous protocols, and the safe application of these therapies in humans has not been assessed. Further studies are necessary to confirm the benefits and safety of targeted topical therapy on patients with lymphedema.

The addition of self-lymphatic drainage to compression therapy instead of manual lymphatic drainage in the first phase of complex decongestive therapy for treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: A randomized-controlled, prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adding self-lymphatic drainage (SLD) to compression bandaging (CB) therapy rather than manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) in the first phase of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) on arm edema, quality of life, upper extremity function, and anxiety-depression in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2015 and January 2017, a total of 24 patients (mean age 58.9±10.3 years; range, 42 to 83 years) with BCRL were randomly assigned to receive CB or CB plus SLD. The edema of the arm was assessed by volume calculation based on the circumference measurements. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH) for upper extremity functions, the Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) for the quality of life, and the Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale (HADS) for anxiety and depression were used. The patients were assessed before the treatment, at the end of the treatment, and six months after the treatment. RESULTS: A significant volume decrease was observed in the affected arm in both groups at the end of the treatment. Statistically significant improvements in the SF-36 and Q-DASH scores were observed in both groups; however, there was no significant change in the HADS-anxiety and depression subscale scores. CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that compression therapy with or without SLD is effective in the treatment of BCRL. However, the addition of SLD to CB in the first phase of CDT rather than MLD seems to provide no additional significant benefit.

Breast reconstruction and risk of arm lymphedema development: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema remains a significant complication following breast cancer surgery when there is axillary lymph node intervention. Previous systematic reviews have identified risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema, including increased BMI, number of lymph nodes dissected and radiotherapy. However, they have not examined the effect of breast reconstruction on lymphedema occurrence. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to evaluate the association between breast reconstruction (BR) and lymphedema. METHODS: We searched PubMed (1966-2016), Embase (1966-2016), Scopus (2004-2016) and Google Scholar (2004-2016) for studies involving breast reconstruction and upper-extremity lymphedema or breast cancer-related lymphedema. Our primary outcome was lymphedema occurrence. We performed a meta-analysis using random effects due to heterogeneity of the studies. RESULTS: Our search strategy identified 934 articles. After screening, 19 studies were included in our meta-analysis evaluating outcomes based on number of patients (7501) or number of breasts surgically treated (2063). Breast reconstruction was significantly associated with lower odds of lymphedema (p < 0.001) compared to mastectomy only or breast-conserving surgery. Lymphedema rates were not statistically significantly different between patients undergoing implant-based or autologous BR. CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction is associated with lower rates of lymphedema compared to mastectomy only or breast conserving surgery patients. Although the study does not prove causation, we hypothesize that this association is likely due to multiple factors, including a self-selecting population and mechanisms through which BR may contribute to primary or secondary prevention of lymphedema. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify this beneficial relationship between breast reconstruction and reduced lymphedema risk.

Advances in Resistance Training for Postoperative Upper Limb Lymphedema in Patients with Breast Cancer / 中国康复理论与实践

@#Resistance training could promote the drainage of lymph fluid, and reduce the swelling of the affected limb. This article reviewed the mechanism of resistance training in upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer surgery, the timing of resistance training, and the specific measures and evaluation indicators of resistance training in local muscles, whole body muscles and other therapies.

Breast cancer related lymphedema treated by super-microsurgery / 中华内分泌外科杂志

Objective Lymphedema is a common complication interrupting a large percentage of breast cancer survivors .How to release the breast cancer survivors from the pain of lymphedema remains a question to breast surgeons .The rapid development of the super-microsurgical measurement allows lymphaticovenular anasto-mosis to become a better way to treat breast cancer related lymphedema .Methods We followed a breast cancer related lymphedema case amd offered super-microsurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis to her .Results The surgery lasted 4.5 h, and contained 11 anastomosis of lymph ducts .Improvement of edema could be seen during the surgery and the measurement of the upper limb became smaller just one day after surgery .Conclusion Su-per-microsurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis is a safe improvement for extremity lymphedema after mastectomy and it can provide a better prognosis and appearance .

Risk factors for breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema:a meta-analysis / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective To systematically evaluate the risk factors for upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment and the strength of their associations.Methods PubMed,Ovid,EMbase,and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify clinical trials published up to December 2012.The quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale;data analysis was performed by Stata 10.0 and RevMan 5.2;the strength of associations between risk factors and breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema was described as odds ratio (OR) and 95％ confidence intervals (CI).Results Twenty-two studies involving 10106 patients were included in the meta-analysis.The risk factors for upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment mainly included axillary lymph node dissection (OR =2.72,95％ CI=1.06-6.99,P=0.038),hypertension (OR=1.84,95％ CI=1.38-2.44,P=0.000),body mass index (OR =1.68,95％ CI=1.22-2.32,P =0.001),and radiotherapy (OR =1.65,95％ CI =1.20-2.25,P =0.002),while no significant associations were found for such factors as chemotherapy,age,number of positive lymph nodes,and number of dissected lymph nodes.Conclusions The incidence of upper extremity lymphedema is high among patients with breast cancer after treatment,and axillary lymph node dissection,hypertension,body mass index,and radiotherapy are the main risk factors for lymphedema after breast cancer treatment.

Research progress of axillary reverse mapping:A new technique to minimize arm lymphedema after breast cancer surgery / 中国肿瘤临床

Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is a technique used to map and preserve arm lymphatic drainage during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and/or sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND). As a result, the risk of arm lymphedema is reduced. ARM is an emerging technology for breast cancer surgery and currently in the clinical trial phase. In this article, related clinical trials conducted in recent years were reviewed and the displaying methods of ARM lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels were analyzed. The feasibility of retained ARM lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels was also evaluated. Furthermore, the clinical significance of ARM was evaluated in terms of the reduction of the incidence of upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer surgery.