Evaluating the factor structure, reliability and validity of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (CBI-SS) among faculty of arts students of Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria.

The Copenhagen burnout inventory-student survey (CBI-SS) has shown promising psychometric properties in diverse student populations. This study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of the Nigerian version of the CBI-SS. This was a cross-sectional study of 635 students from Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was utilized to assess the CBI-SS validity. The reliability score of the CBI-SS was 0.957, ranging from 0.862 to 0.914 for the subscales. Correlation coefficients among the four CBI-SS factors ranged from 0.507 to 0.713. The CFA indicated an adequate goodness-of-fit for the four-factor model of the CBI-SS with the sample data. However, Item 10 was removed due to unacceptably low Average Variance Extracted score. The four factors demonstrated a negative correlation with both General Academic Self-Efficacy Scale and Cumulative Grade Point Average. Furthermore, both self-reported burnout and perceived course stress showed associations with the CBI-SS, where lower levels of burnout corresponded with lower median scores on the CBI-SS scales. This study underscores the significance of the CBI-SS in evaluating student burnout within our student population. The findings indicate that the CBI-SS is a highly reliable and valid instrument for assessing student burnout, suggesting its potential for effective utilization in the Nigerian academic context.

Development, validity and reliability of patient perception of scoliosis-specific physiotherapy (physio-is) questionnaire.

PURPOSE: To develop a questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE) and to evaluate its content validity, structural validity, and reliability. METHODOLOGY: Seven PSSE treatment experts checked the content validity of the Patient's Perception of Scoliosis-Specific Physiotherapy Questionnaire (Physio-IS). For each Physio-IS item, the content validity indexes must be ≥ 90%. Regarding structural validity and reliability 52 adolescents (ages 10-17) with AIS completed the questionnaire. Structural validity was assessed through exploratory factor analysis. Reliability was verified through internal consistency. RESULTS: Physio-IS content was validated in three evaluation rounds, obtaining 100% expert agreement. About structural validity we identified four domains (cumulative explained variance = 68.2%): (1) specific knowledge (seven questions on understanding their scoliosis condition); (2) social repercussion (five questions about social relationship implications); (3) pain (two questions about scoliosis-associated pain); and (4) associated concern (apprehension/expectations regarding the future). The Physio-IS demonstrated very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.76-0.92). CONCLUSION: The Physio-IS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing AIS patients undergoing PSSE and helping physiotherapists identify aspects requiring more attention, thus facilitating intervention strategies, as knowing the patient's perception of their condition or treatment is fundamental to AIS treatment success.

Physio-IS is an innovative tool in the treatment of Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).Physio-IS is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of adolescents with AIS undergoing phyisiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE).The specific questionnaire can contribute to physiotherapeutic treatment decisions, allowing the physical therapist to see the patient as a whole.

Case Study: Design of an Approach for Assessing a Novel Health Capability Maturity Model.

Capability maturity models have been developed and are widely used within healthcare aiming to assess the degree of digitization of the organization, but empirical assessments of the models themselves has been undertaken infrequently. We present a mixed-method approach to assessing a novel health capability maturity model developed by a state government responsible for the management of 86 health services. The approach was designed to be suitable for system level assessment of services and pooled the wisdom and experience of subject matter experts and key stakeholders using a combination of survey and interviews to test and tune the proposed assessment approach and parameters. We applied the approach to assess the target capability model across a number of public health services in Victoria, Australia. The result showed sufficient validity to be able to generate recommendations for further improvement of the capability model and the assessment approach to enable broader application within Australia.

Concurrent and predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 administered to infants born preterm in Norway.

BACKGROUND: The correlation between the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 (PDMS-2) has not previously been assessed in Norwegian infants. Our purpose was to investigate the concurrent validity of the AIMS and the PDMS-2 in a group of high-risk infants, and to investigate the predictive validity of the two tests for atypical motor function at 24 months post term age (PTA). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of the AIMS and the PDMS-2 administered to infants born preterm with gestational age ≤ 32 weeks (n = 139) who had participated in a randomized controlled trial of early parent-administered physiotherapy. The infants' motor development had been assessed using the AIMS and the PDMS-2 at 6- and 12-months. The primary outcome was PDMS-2 at 24-months PTA. To explore the correlation between the two tests we used Spearman's rho. Bland Altman plots were used to detect if there were systematic differences between the measurements. Receiver-operating characteristics curves were used to calculate area under the curve as an estimate of diagnostic accuracy of the AIMS and the PDMS- with respect to motor outcome at 24 months. RESULTS: The correlation between the AIMS and the PDMS-2 (total motor and locomotion subscale), at 6 months, was r = 0.44 and r = 0.76, and at 12 months r = 0.56 and r = 0.80 respectively. The predictive validity for atypical motor function at 24 months, assessed using the area under the curve at 6- and at 12- months, was for the AIMS 0.87 and 0.86, respectively, and for the PDMS-2 locomotion subscale 0.82 and 0.76 respectively. CONCLUSION: The correlation between the AIMS and the PDMS-2 locomotion subscale, at 6- and 12- months PTA, was good to excellent in a group of infants born preterm in Norway. And the AIMS and the locomotion subscale of the PDMS-2 were equally good predictors for atypical motor outcomes at 24 months PTA. These findings indicate that the AIMS and the locomotion subscale of the PDM-2, could be used interchangeable when assessing motor development in infants at 6- or 12 months of age. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01089296.

Examining early learners' perceptions of inclusion: adaptation of the student version of the perceptions of inclusion questionnaire for first- and second-grade students (PIQ-EARLY).

Promoting the emotional and social development of students with and without special needs is a central goal of implementing inclusive education in the school system. The entry into school, and thus into the formal education system, is accompanied by emotions and changes in self-image and social relationships. For assessing emotional inclusion, social inclusion, and academic self-concept, the Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ) is a widely used instrument. To date, the paper-pencil questionnaire has been used from third through ninth grades but has not yet been used with younger ages. This paper presents an adapted version of the PIQ for first- and second-grade students, which was used on two measurement time occasions (T1, N = 407, MAge = 7.2; T2, N = 613, MAge = 7.6). Information on students' reading and listening comprehension was collected from the class teachers to verify whether the adapted questionnaire can be used for all students with different levels of language competencies. Measurement invariance was demonstrated to be at least scalar for all groups considered in the analyses. Students with higher rankings of reading and listening comprehension skills reported significant higher levels of emotional inclusion and academic self-concept while there were no significant differences in social inclusion. The findings suggest that the PIQ-EARLY is a suitable instrument for assessing self-perceived inclusion in first- and second-grade students. The results also highlight the importance of students' language competencies for adjustment to school in early school years.

Assessing culturally inclusive instructional design in online learning.

This study assessed the psychometric properties of the culturally inclusive instructional design (CIID) scale with 31 items on a 7-point Likert scale. The data were collected from the training (N = 55) and validating samples (N = 80) of K-20 educators. Data analysis employed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). EFA results revealed a clear five-factor structure, and the CFA results indicated good factor loadings. The reliability indices were .95 and .94 for the training and validation samples, respectively. The significant correlations among the factors indicated the five subscales measuring on the same CIID construct. In contrast, a non-perfect correlation presented a discriminating power for each subscale measuring the unique dimension of the construct. The study results established the validity and reliability of the instrument to measure culturally inclusive instructional design with implications for the design and development of online learning for cultural inclusivity.

A Beta Version of an Application Based on Computer Vision for the Assessment of Knee Valgus Angle: A Validity and Reliability Study.

BACKGROUND: In handball, the kinematics of the frontal plane seem to be one of the most important factors for the development of lower limb injuries. The knee valgus angle is a fundamental axis for injury prevention and is usually measured with 2D systems such as Kinovea software (Version 0.9.4.). Technological advances such as computer vision have the potential to revolutionize sports medicine. However, the validity and reliability of computer vision must be evaluated before using it in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to analyze the test-retest and inter-rater reliability and the concurrent validity of a beta version app based on computer vision for the measurement of knee valgus angle in elite handball athletes. METHODS: The knee valgus angle of 42 elite handball athletes was measured. A frontal photo during a single-leg squat was taken, and two examiners measured the angle by the beta application based on computer vision at baseline and at one-week follow-up to calculate the test-retest and inter-rater reliability. A third examiner assessed the knee valgus angle using 2D Kinovea software to calculate the concurrent validity. RESULTS: The knee valgus angle in the elite handball athletes was 158.54 ± 5.22°. The test-retest reliability for both examiners was excellent, showing an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.859-0.933. The inter-rater reliability showed a moderate ICC: 0.658 (0.354-0.819). The standard error of the measurement with the app was stated between 1.69° and 3.50°, and the minimum detectable change was stated between 4.68° and 9.70°. The concurrent validity was strong r = 0.931; p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The computer-based smartphone app showed an excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability and a strong concurrent validity compared to Kinovea software for the measurement of the knee valgus angle.

Objective psychomotor laparoscopic skills evaluation using a low-cost wearable device based on accelerometry: construct and concurrent validity study.

BACKGROUND: Motion analysis of surgical maneuvers provides useful quantitative information for the objective evaluation of the surgeons. However, surgical simulation laboratories for laparoscopic training do not usually integrate devices that help quantify the level of skills of the surgeons due to their limited resources and the high costs of new technologies. The purpose of this study is to present the construct and concurrent validity of a low-cost motion tracking system, based on a wireless triaxial accelerometer, employed to objectively evaluate psychomotor skills of surgeons during laparoscopic training. METHODS: An accelerometry system, a wireless three-axis accelerometer with appearance of wristwatch, was placed on the dominant hand of the surgeons to register the motion during the laparoscopy practice with the EndoViS simulator, which simultaneously recorded the motion of the laparoscopic needle driver. This study included the participation of 30 surgeons (6 experts, 14 intermediates and 10 novices) who performed the task of intracorporeal knot-tying suture. Using 11 motion analysis parameters (MAPs), the performance of each participant was assessed. Subsequently, the scores of the three groups of surgeons were statistically analyzed. In addition, a validity study was conducted comparing the metrics between the accelerometry-tracking system and the EndoViS hybrid simulator. RESULTS: Construct validity was achieved for 8 of the 11 metrics examined with the accelerometry system. Concurrent validity demonstrated that there is a strong correlation between the results of the accelerometry system and the EndoViS simulator in 9 of 11 parameters, showing reliability of the accelerometry system as an objective evaluation method. CONCLUSION: The accelerometry system was successfully validated. This method is potentially useful to complement the objective evaluation of surgeons during laparoscopic practice in training environments such as box-trainers and simulators.

The Trail Making Test (part B) is associated with working memory: A concurrent validity study.

The Test Making Test (TMT) was originally created as a distributed attention test. Part B (TMT-B) has been proposed as representative of executive functions as effective problem solving and working memory. This study aimed to explore the validity of the TMT-B as an indicator of working memory in adults. A cross-sectional study was conducted by using linear correlation coefficients between the TMT-B and neuropsychological and electrophysiological tests of working memory. Fifty-six individuals participated, all of which had normal cognitive functioning and were aged between 19 and 55 years old. Results show a significant correlation among the TMT-B scores with all subtests, the overall score of the Corsi Block-Tapping Test, the Working Memory Index of the WAIS-IV (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) (p ≤ .05) and the auditory Event Related Potentials (p < .01) with the N200 and P300 latencies and amplitudes. These findings are preliminary evidence of the validity of the TMT-B for the evaluation of working memory in adults. Additional studies are required to assess the differential validity of the TMT-B in the evaluation of working memory, through comparative correlational analyzes with the results of various neuropsychological tests that assess other cognitive functions.

Utility of PHQ-2, PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 for detecting major depression in primary health care: a validation study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Primary health care (PHC) professionals may play a crucial role in improving early diagnosis of depressive disorders. However, only 50% of cases are detected in PHC. The most widely used screening instrument for major depression is the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), including the two-, eight- and nine-item versions. Surprisingly, there is neither enough evidence about the validity of PHQ in PHC patients in Spain nor indications about how to interpret the total scores. This study aimed to gather validity evidence to support the use of the three PHQ versions to screen for major depression in PHC in Spain. Additionally, the present study provided information for helping professionals to choose the best PHQ version according to the context. METHODS: The sample was composed of 2579 participants from 22 Spanish PHC centers participating in the EIRA-3 study. The reliability and validity of the three PHQ versions for Spanish PHC patients were assessed based on responses to the questionnaire. RESULTS: The PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 showed high internal consistency. The results obtained confirm the theoretically expected relationship between PHQ results and anxiety, social support and health-related QoL. A single-factor solution was confirmed. Regarding to the level of agreement with the CIDI interview (used as the criterion), our results indicate that the PHQ has a good discrimination power. The optimal cut-off values were: ⩾2 for PHQ-2, ⩾7 for PHQ-8 and ⩾8 for PHQ-9. CONCLUSIONS: PHQ is a good and valuable tool for detecting major depression in PHC patients in Spain.

Elaboration of an educational video for cardiopulmonary resuscitation with chest compressions in adults / Elaboración de un video educativo para reanimación cardiopulmonar con compresiones torácicas en adultos / Elaboração de vídeo educativo para reanimação cardiopulmonar com compressões torácicas em adultos

ABSTRACT Objectives: to develop and analyze the face and content validity of a storyboard for constructing an educational video for training laypersons in cardiopulmonary resuscitation with only chest compressions in adults. Methods: a methodological study of storyboard elaboration and validity for producing an educational health video. The storyboard was submitted to analysis of 20 judges to assess its adequacy with the proposed objective. To assess the agreement between judges, the Content Validity Index was calculated. After validating the storyboard, video production took place. Results: the Content Validity Index met expectations. Its mean in each group was ≥ 0.90 (lay judges = 0.97; expert judges = 0.90; all judges = 0.94). Conclusions: the video produced is composed of scientific information, professional expertise and laypersons' perceptions, making it important evidence for health education.

RESUMEN Objetivos: elaborar y analizar la validez de apariencia y contenido de un storyboard para la construcción de un video educativo para la formación de legos en reanimación cardiopulmonar con solo compresiones torácicas en adultos. Métodos: estudio metodológico de la elaboración y validación de un storyboard para la producción de un video educativo en salud. El storyboard fue sometido al análisis de 20 jueces, para evaluar su adecuación al objetivo propuesto. Para evaluar la concordancia entre los jueces se calculó el Índice de Validez de Contenido. Después de validar el guión gráfico, se produjo el video. Resultados: el Índice de Validez de Contenido obtenido cumplió con las expectativas. Su promedio en cada grupo fue ≥ 0,90 (jueces legos = 0,97; jueces expertos = 0,90; todos los jueces = 0,94). Conclusiones: el video producido está compuesto por información científica, experiencia profesional y percepciones de los legos, lo que lo convierte en evidencia importante para la educación en salud.

RESUMO Objetivos: elaborar e analisar a validade de face e de conteúdo de um storyboard para a construção de um vídeo educativo para treinamento de leigos em reanimação cardiopulmonar somente com compressões torácicas em adultos. Métodos: estudo metodológico de elaboração e validação de um storyboard para a produção de um vídeo educativo em saúde. O storyboard foi submetido à análise de 20 juízes, para avaliação de sua adequação com objetivo proposto. Para avaliar a concordância entre os juízes, calculou-se o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo. Após a validação do storyboard, ocorreu a produção do vídeo. Resultados: o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo obtido atendeu ao esperado. A média dele em cada grupo esteve ≥ 0,90 (juízes leigos = 0,97; juízes experts = 0,90; todos os juízes = 0,94). Conclusões: o vídeo produzido é composto por informações científicas, expertise profissional e percepções de leigos, tornando-se importante evidência para a educação em saúde.

Diseño de un instrumento para evaluar las actividades profesionales confiables en cirugía general.

AIM: Competency-based medical education has become increasingly prevalent among surgical accreditation bodies that conduct assessments to ensure the competency of future professionals and judge the adequacy of training programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study to validate an instrument to evaluate entrustable professional activities (EPA) according to the Single Program of Medical Specialties through content and construct validity by expert judgment, and internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: Four of the rubrics scored high to optimal for univocity and relevance. Only one rubric had to be modified in two of its items. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha of 0.97). When applying the instrument, the residents showed differences in the level of competence according to postgraduate year, identifying better performance in the last year. DISCUSSION: The instrument was validated with a high degree of reliability in univocity and relevance, and high internal consistency. The residents demonstrated appropriate EPA to manage surgical patients safely, efficiently, with quality and warmth. The ability to reach the strategic level of performance is the main component of the competency-based medical education through the EPA.

OBJETIVO: La educación médica basada en competencias se ha vuelto cada vez más frecuente entre los organismos de acreditación quirúrgica que realizan evaluaciones para asegurar la competencia de los futuros profesionales y juzgar la idoneidad de los programas de formación. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal para validar un instrumento para evaluar las actividades profesionales confiables (APC) según el Programa Único de Especialidades Médicas mediante validez de contenido y constructo por juicio de expertos, y consistencia interna con alfa de Cronbach. RESULTADOS: Cuatro de las rúbricas obtuvieron nivel alto a óptimo para univocidad y relevancia. Solo una rúbrica debió ser modificada en dos de sus ítems. La consistencia interna fue alta (alfa de Cronbach de 0.97). Al aplicar el instrumento, los residentes mostraron diferencias en el nivel competencial según el año de posgrado, identificando mejor desempeño el último año. DISCUSIÓN: El instrumento fue validado con un alto grado de fiabilidad en univocidad y relevancia, y una alta consistencia interna. Los residentes demostraron poseer las APC necesarias para tratar pacientes quirúrgicos de manera segura, eficiente, con calidad y calidez. La capacidad para alcanzar el nivel estratégico de desempeño es el componente principal de la educación médica basada en competencias a través de las APC.

Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of PROMIS self-efficacy for managing symptoms item bank: Item response theory.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) self-efficacy for managing symptoms of the version 1.0 item bank in Korean. METHODS: This study consisted of two phases: first, developing the Korean version of the item bank following the translation guidelines; and second, performing a cross-sectional study to evaluate its psychometric properties using the item response theory. This study enrolled 323 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus between July and August 2020. Cronbach's α was used to assess the reliability of this item bank. Confirmatory factor analysis, using diagonally weighted least squares, was used to identify the assumptions of item response theory. Item parameter estimates including discrimination and thresholds were derived using the graded response model of the item response theory to reflect patient-reported outcomes as individualized responses. RESULTS: The Korean version of the item bank demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α =.98) and its discrimination ranged from 1.82 to 4.93. The thresholds resulted in the establishment of a category response curve for each item. However, no overlap was observed among the category curves. Moreover, the differential item functioning was not significant for age, gender, and income variables. CONCLUSION: The graded response model and differential item functioning provided qualitative evidence that demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties of symptom management self-efficacy among patients. This item bank is expected to provide adequate assessments of self-efficacy of symptom management for patients with a chronic disease, which can contribute to nursing research and intervention.

Measurement of Social Strain in People with Dementia: A Preliminary Study of the Reliability and Validity of the Negative Relationship Quality Questionnaire in Indonesia.

People with dementia (PWD) may exhibit symptoms that negatively affect their relationships with their families or friends which could cause social strain. The Negative Relationship Quality (NRQ) questionnaire can be used to measure social strain in PWD. There has never been an Indonesian adaptation of the NRQ. This preliminary study aimed to measure the validity and reliability of the NRQ among PWD in Indonesia (NRQ-INA). This study used a cross-sectional design. Forward−backward translation methods were conducted first. Pearson's correlation and factor analysis were employed for the validity test. Cronbach's alpha and test−retest were used to determine reliability. The NRQ-INA has four parallel items related to social strain that are divided into three subscales and asked to spouse/partner, family members, and friends, leading to a total of 12 questions. The results of validity testing from 60 respondents showed that all items in the NRQ-INA were strongly valid with correlation coefficients (r) of >0.8 (p < 0.01). Factor analysis showed a convergence with the variance explained of more than 50% for all items in each subscale, which also indicated that NRQ-INA had acceptable construct validity to measure social strain. Cronbach's alpha values (α) were 0.926, 0.942, and 0.938 for the subscales of spouse, friends, and family members, respectively. The correlations of test−retest reliability for all items were >0.7 (p < 0.01), demonstrating a reliable NRQ-INA measurement. In conclusion, NRQ-INA had a good validity and reliability to measure social strain in PWD. Further study of the concurrent validity among PWD is still needed.

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire for Adolescents.

This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brief Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire (ICQ-15) administered to Chinese adolescents. A sample of 1705 adolescents (Mean age = 14.08, SD = 3.22, 46.5% male) completed a questionnaire including the Chinese version of the ICQ-15, as well as measurements of well-being, psychological resilience, and depression. To examine the psychometric properties of the ICQ-15, item analyses (item-total correlation and normality test), confirmatory factor analysis, concurrent validity analyses, multi-group analyses, and internal consistency analyses were performed. The results of the item analyses suggested a good item-total correlation, and the item scores were distributed approximately normally. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five-factor model had acceptable fit indices. The concurrent validity analyses indicated that the Chinese version of the ICQ-15 had a satisfactory concurrent validity. The multi-group analyses proved the measurement invariance across females and males, as well as participants in early, middle, and late adolescence. The ICQ-15 demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency reliability among Chinese adolescents. The ICQ-15 presents good psychometric properties and can be used to assess interpersonal competence in Chinese adolescents.

COVID-19 Pandemic Psychosocial Impact Scale: Scale Development and Reliability and Validity Study.

Background: The aim of this research is to develop a multidimensional scale that reveals the psychosocial impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on people with its dimensions. Methods: An item pool of 155 questions was created by examining the literature, and these items were turned into a questionnaire with 76 questions by taking expert opinions. During the pilot study, this questionnaire was applied to 335 people from the general population, who were reached with the snowball sampling model. The second phase of the study was carried out with a second new sample group consisting of 826 participants, and confirmatory factor analysis, mean explained variance and compound reliability, and Cronbach's alpha analyses were applied to the obtained data. The test-retest study of the scale was re-applied to the second sample group, reaching 826 participants with an interval of 3 weeks. Results: The explained variance value of the scale was 81.352%. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the factor loads of the items of the scale were between 0.59 and 0.91, and the relationships between the items and the latent variables were significant at the P < .01 level; fit criteria is excellent and acceptable; Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be between 0.897 and 0.957, and as a result of the test-retest, the reliability coefficients were found to be between 0.948 and 0.950. Conclusion: From the results obtained, it was accepted that all the reliability and validity indicators of the COVID-19 pandemic Psychosocial Impact Scale are high and can be used as a valid and reliable scale to measure the psychosocial effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic process on individuals.

Bundle: medical adhesive-related skin injury prevention in adult intensive care / Bundle: prevención de lesiones cutáneas relacionadas con adhesivos médicos en cuidados intensivos de adultos / Bundle: prevenção de lesões de pele relacionadas a adesivos médicos em terapia intensiva adulto

ABSTRACT Objective to build and validate a bundle for medical adhesive-related skin injury prevention in adult intensive care. Method this is a methodological study, carried out in three stages: development of a Scoping Review, bundle construction and content validity. This scoping review followed the JBI recommendations, and the content validity process was performed using the Delphi technique. Six expert judges participated in this process. For content validity analysis, the Content Validity Coefficient and binomial test were calculated. Items that reached a coefficient ≥0.80 and an agreement proportion of 80% among judges were considered valid for the binomial test. Results the bundle structure had 21 recommendations, grouped into categories: skin assessment, identification of patients at risk, product selection, skin preparation, adhesive application technique, adhesive removal technique and health professionals' education. The criteria established for assessment achieved satisfactory levels of assessment, being considered adequate by judges. In Delphi I, the assessed items obtained a Content Validity Coefficient ≥0.83 and in Delphi II, ≥0.97. Conclusion in this study, it was allowed to construct and validate a bundle for medical adhesive-related skin injury prevention in adult intensive care.

RESUMEN Objetivo construir y validar un bundle para la prevención de lesiones cutáneas relacionadas con adhesivos médicos en cuidados intensivos de adultos. Método se trata de un estudio metodológico, realizado en tres etapas: elaboración de un Scoping Review, construcción del bundle y validación de contenido. La revisión del alcance siguió las recomendaciones del JBI y el proceso de validación de contenido se realizó mediante la técnica Delphi. En este proceso participaron seis jueces expertos. Para el análisis de validación de contenido se calculó el Coeficiente de Validez de Contenido y la prueba binomial. Se consideraron válidos para la prueba binomial los ítems que alcanzaron un coeficiente ≥0,80 y una proporción de concordancia del 80% entre los jueces. Resultados la estructura del bundle tenía 21 recomendaciones, agrupadas en categorías: evaluación de la piel, identificación de pacientes en riesgo, selección de productos, preparación de la piel, técnica de aplicación de adhesivos, técnica de eliminación de adhesivos y educación continua de los profesionales de la salud. Los criterios establecidos para la evaluación lograron niveles de evaluación satisfactorios, siendo considerados adecuados por los jueces. En Delphi I, los ítems evaluados obtuvieron un Coeficiente de Validación de Contenido ≥0,83 y en Delphi II, ≥0,97. Conclusión en este estudio fue posible construir y validar un bundle para la prevención de lesiones cutáneas relacionadas con los adhesivos médicos en cuidados intensivos de adultos.

RESUMO Objetivo construir e validar um bundle para a prevenção de lesões de pele relacionadas a adesivos médicos em terapia intensiva adulto. Método trata-se de um estudo metodológico, realizado em três etapas: desenvolvimento de uma Scoping Review, construção do bundle e validação de conteúdo. A Scoping Review seguiu as recomendações do Joanna Briggs Institute, e o processo de validação de conteúdo foi realizado, por meio da técnica Delphi. Participaram desse processo seis juízes especialistas. Para a análise da validação de conteúdo, foram calculados o Coeficiente de Validade de Conteúdo e teste binomial. Foram considerados válidos os itens que atingiram coeficiente ≥0,80 e a proporção de concordância de 80% entre os juízes, para o teste binomial. Resultados a estrutura do bundle contou com 21 recomendações, agrupadas em categorias: avaliação da pele, identificação dos pacientes de risco, seleção do produto, preparo da pele, técnica de aplicação do adesivo, técnica de remoção do adesivo e educação permanente dos profissionais de saúde. Os critérios estabelecidos para a avalição alcançaram níveis de avalição satisfatórios, sendo considerados adequados pelos juízes. Em Delphi I, os itens avaliados obtiveram um Coeficiente de Validação de Conteúdo ≥0,83 e em Delphi II, ≥0,97. Conclusão neste estudo, permitiu-se construir e validar bundle, para a prevenção de leões de pele relacionadas a adesivos médicos em terapia intensiva adulto.

Questionnaire to assess parents' knowledge about infant complementary feeding: construction and validity / Cuestionario para evaluar el conocimiento de los padres sobre alimentación complementaria infantil: construcción y validación / Questionário para avaliar o conhecimento dos pais sobre alimentação complementar do lactente: construção e validação

ABSTRACT Objective to construct and validate a questionnaire to assess parents' knowledge about infant complementary feeding. Method this is a methodological study developed from March 2017 to May 2020 with a sample of experts (6) and parents/guardians of infants (374). It was based on the psychometric framework in which construction, content validity (content validity index), construct validity (factor analysis) and internal and structural consistency analysis (Cronbach's alpha) and reproducibility (intraclass correlation index) were carried out. Results the questionnaire obtained three versions until reaching its final version with 23 items distributed in two axes: introduction of complementary feeding; preparation and way of eating, reaching an overall CVI of 0.83 in the judges' analysis. Exploratory factor analysis proved to be adequate (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkim of 0.70 and Bartlett's test of sphericity with p<0.001). The final Cronbach's alpha of the 23-item scale was 0.79, demonstrating adequate internal consistency. The intraclass correlation index was 0.615, demonstrating good instrument reproducibility. Conclusion the questionnaire showed evidence of validity to assess parents' knowledge about infant complementary feeding.

RESUMEN Objetivo construir y validar un cuestionario para evaluar el conocimiento de los padres sobre la alimentación complementaria infantil. Método se trata de un estudio metodológico desarrollado desde marzo de 2017 hasta mayo de 2020o con una muestra de especialistas (6) y padres/cuidadores de lactantes (374). Se basó en el marco psicométrico en el que se realizó la construcción, validación de contenido (índice de validación de contenido), validación de constructo (análisis factorial) y análisis de consistencia interna y estructural (alfa de Cronbach) y reproducibilidad (índice de correlación intraclase). Resultados el cuestionario obtuvo tres versiones hasta llegar a su versión final con 23 ítems distribuidos en dos ejes: introducción de alimentación complementaria; preparación y forma de comer, alcanzando un CVI overall de 0,83 en el análisis de los jueces. El análisis factorial exploratorio demostró ser adecuado (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkim de 0,70 y esfericidad de Bartlett con p<0,001). El alfa de Cronbach final de la escala de 23 ítems fue de 0,79, demostrando una consistencia interna adecuada. El índice de correlación intraclase fue de 0,615, lo que demuestra una buena reproducibilidad del instrumento. Conlusión el cuestionario mostró evidencias de validez para evaluar el conocimiento de los padres de lactantes sobre alimentación complementaria.

RESUMO Objetivo construir e validar um questionário para avaliar o conhecimento dos pais sobre alimentação complementar do lactente. Método estudo metodológico desenvolvido de março de 2017 a maio de 2020 com uma amostra de especialistas (6) e de pais/cuidadores de lactentes (374) baseado no referencial psicométrico em que se procederam a construção, a validação de conteúdo (índice de validação de conteúdo), a validação de construto (análise fatorial) e análise da consistência interna e estrutural (Alfa de Cronbach) e reprodutibilidade (índice de correlação intraclasse). Resultados o questionário obteve três versões até alcançar sua versão final com 23 itens distribuídos em dois eixos: introdução da alimentação complementar e preparo e forma de alimentar alcançando IVC global de 0,83 na análise dos juízes. A análise fatorial exploratória mostrou-se adequada (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkim de 0,70 e a esfericidade de Bartlett com p<0,001). O Alfa de Cronbach final da escala com 23 itens foi de 0,79, demonstrando consistência interna adequada. O índice de correlação intraclasse foi de 0,615 demonstrando boa reprodutibilidade do instrumento. Conclusão o questionário demostrou evidências de validade para avaliar o conhecimento dos pais de lactentes sobre alimentação complementar.

Elaboração e Validação de Conteúdo de um instrumento sobre as atividades dos Agentes Comunitários de Saúde / Elaboración y Validación de Contenido de un instrumento sobre las actividades de los Agentes Comunitarios de Salud / Elaboration and Content Validity of an instrument on the activities of Community Health Workers

Resumo Objetivo elaborar e conduzir a validação de conteúdo e de aparência de um instrumento para identificação das atividades desempenhadas pelos agentes comunitários de saúde na Estratégia Saúde da Família. Método trata-se de um estudo metodológico composto por três etapas: a primeira foi a elaboração do instrumento a partir da revisão de literatura; a segunda foi constituída pela validação de conteúdo por 10 juízes experts; e a terceira pela validação aparente pela população-alvo. Para a análise, calculou-se o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo. Resultados inicialmente, o instrumento foi composto por 45 itens dispostos em 10 dimensões. Os especialistas analisaram e sugeriram a modificação de termos e o acréscimo e o desmembramento de itens. Todas as sugestões foram acolhidas e a versão final do instrumento foi composta por 60 itens. O Índice de Validade de Conteúdo foi ≥ 0,90 para todos os itens. O instrumento abrangeu as atividades preconizadas pelas normativas ministeriais e pelas atribuições que fogem do escopo de atuação, mas que estão presentes na prática dos profissionais. Conclusão e implicações para a prática o instrumento apresentou validade satisfatória e refletiu a realidade do trabalho dos agentes comunitários de saúde, sendo seus itens compostos pela ampla gama de atividades desenvolvidas por esses profissionais.

Resumen Objetivo desarrollar y realizar la validación de contenido y la apariencia de un instrumento para la identificación de las actividades realizadas por los agentes comunitarios de salud en la Estrategia de Salud de la Familia. Método se trata de un estudio metodológico compuesto por tres etapas: la primera fue la elaboración del instrumento, a partir de una revisión bibliográfica; la segunda consistió en la validación de contenido por 10 jueces expertos y la tercera en validación aparente por parte de la población objetivo. Para el análisis se calculó el Índice de Validez de Contenido. Resultados Inicialmente, el instrumento constaba de 45 ítems, ordenados en diez dimensiones. Los expertos analizaron y sugirieron la modificación de los términos y la adición y desmembración de elementos. Todas las sugerencias fueron aceptadas y la versión final del instrumento constó de 60 ítems. El Índice de Validez de Contenido fue ≥ 0,90 para todos los ítems. El instrumento abarcó actividades recomendadas por normas ministeriales y actividades que están fuera del ámbito de actuación, pero que están presentes en la práctica profesional. Conclusión e implicaciones para la práctica El instrumento presentó validez satisfactoria y refleja la realidad del trabajo de los agentes comunitarios de salud. Sus ítems están compuestos por la amplia gama de actividades desarrolladas por estos profesionales.

Abstract Objective to develop and validate the content and appearance of an instrument to identify activities performed by community health workers in Family Health Strategy. Method this is a methodological study composed of three stages: the first was the elaboration of the instrument based on a literature review, the second consisted of content validity by ten expert judges, and the third by apparent validity by the target population. For analysis, the content validity index was calculated. Results Initially, the instrument consisted of 45 items arranged in ten dimensions. The experts analyzed and suggested modification of terms and addition and dismemberment of items. All suggestions were accepted, and the final version of the instrument consisted of 60 items. The content validity index was ≥ 0.90 for all items. The instrument covered the activities recommended by ministerial regulations and activities that are outside the scope of action, but which are present in the practice of the community health workers. Conclusion and implications for practice The instrument presented satisfactory validity and reflected the reality of the community health workers, and its items are composed of the wide range of activities developed by these professionals.

Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Reliability and Validity Testing of a Chinese Version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOGQ-CH).

Freezing of gait is a disabling symptom with a complex episodic nature that is frequently experienced by people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Although China has the largest population with PD in the world, no Chinese version of the freezing of gait questionnaire (FOGQ), the instrument that has been most widely used to assess FOG, has yet been developed. This study aimed to translate and adapt the original version of FOGQ to create a Chinese version, the FOGQ-CH, then assess its reliability, calculate the Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) and investigate its validity. The forward-backwards translation model was adopted, and cultural adaptation included expert review and pretesting. For the reliability study, 31 Chinese native speaking patients with PD were assessed two times in a 7-10 days interval. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the FOGQ-CH were measured by Cronbach's alpha (Cα) and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). For the validity study, 34 native speakers of Chinese with PD were included. To explore the convergent validity, relationships between the FOGQ-CH and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part II (UPDRS II) and Part III (UPDRS III), Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), Timed Up and Go Test in cognitive task (TUGT-Cog), walking speed (10 MWT speed), and step length (10 MWT step length) in a 10-m Walk Test were tested. To explore predictive validity, the number of falls followed up for 6 months were assessed. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was employed to test the capacity of FOGQ-CH to discriminate those with falls. From the reliability study, Cα = 0.823, ICC = 0.786. The MDC0.90 = 4.538. From the validity study, the FOGQ-CH showed moderate correlations with UPDRS II (rho = 0.560, p = 0.001), UPDRS III (rho = 0.451, p = 0.007), TUGT (rho = 0.556, p = 0.007), TUGT-Cog (rho = 0.557, p = 0.001), 10MWT-speed (rho = -0.478, p = 0.004), 10MWT-step length (rho = -0.419, p = 0.014), and the number of falls followed up for 6 months (rho = 0.356, p = 0.045). The AUC = 0.777 (p = 0.036) for predicting whether the participants will have multiple falls (two or more) in the following 6 months. The FOGQ-CH showed good reliability and validity for assessing Chinese native speaking patients with PD. In addition, the FOGQ-CH showed good efficacy for predicting multiple falls in the following 6 months.