Virtual reality gameplay classification illustrates the multidimensionality of visuospatial neglect.

Brain injuries can significantly impact mental processes and lead to hidden disabilities not easily detectable. Traditional methods for assessing these impacts are imprecise, leading to unreliable prevalence estimates and treatments with uncertain effectiveness. Immersive virtual reality has shown promise for assessment, but its use as a standalone tool is rare. Our research focused on developing and validating a standalone immersive virtual reality classification system for unilateral spatial neglect, a condition common following brain injury characterized by inattention to one side of space. Our study involved 51 brain injury inpatients and 30 controls, all engaging with 'The Attention Atlas', an immersive virtual reality game for testing visual search skills. Our classification system aimed to identify patients with neglect, 'minor atypicality' (indicative of inattention not consistent enough to be labelled as neglect) or non-neglect. This categorization was based on a simple mathematical definition, utilizing gameplay to describe spatial orientation (to the left or right side) and attentional challenge (indicative of search inefficiency). These metrics were benchmarked against a normative model to detect atypical visual search, which refers to gameplay beyond the usual bounds. The combination of neglected side, orientation and challenge factors was used to categorize neglect. We discovered a strong correlation between atypical visual search patterns and neglect risk factors, such as middle cerebral artery stroke, parietal injuries and existing neglect diagnoses (Poisson regression incidence rate ratio = 7.18, 95% confidence interval = 4.41-11.90). In our study, immersive virtual reality-identified neglect in one-fourth of the patients (n = 13, 25.5%), minor atypicality in 17.6% (n = 9) and non-neglect in the majority, 56.9% (n = 29). This contrasts with standard assessments, which detected neglect in 17.6% (n = 9) of cases and had no intermediate category. Our analysis determined six categories of neglect, the most common being left hemispace neglect with above-median orientation and challenge scores. Traditional assessments were not significantly more accurate (accuracy = 84.3%, P = 0.06) than a blanket assumption of non-neglect. Traditional assessments were also relatively insensitive in detecting immersive virtual reality-identified neglect (53.8%), particularly in less severe cases and those involving right-side inattention. Our findings underline the effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in revealing various dimensions of neglect, surpassing traditional methods in sensitivity and detail and operating independently from them. To integrate immersive virtual reality into real-world clinical settings, collaboration with healthcare professionals, patients and other stakeholders is crucial to ensure practical applicability and accessibility.

Assessment and treatment of visuospatial neglect using active learning with Gaussian processes regression.

Visuospatial neglect is a disorder characterised by impaired awareness for visual stimuli located in regions of space and frames of reference. It is often associated with stroke. Patients can struggle with all aspects of daily living and community participation. Assessment methods are limited and show several shortcomings, considering they are mainly performed on paper and do not implement the complexity of daily life. Similarly, treatment options are sparse and often show only small improvements. We present an artificial intelligence solution designed to accurately assess a patient's visuospatial neglect in a three-dimensional setting. We implement an active learning method based on Gaussian process regression to reduce the effort it takes a patient to undergo an assessment. Furthermore, we describe how this model can be utilised in patient oriented treatment and how this opens the way to gamification, tele-rehabilitation and personalised healthcare, providing a promising avenue for improving patient engagement and rehabilitation outcomes. To validate our assessment module, we conducted clinical trials involving patients in a real-world setting. We compared the results obtained using our AI-based assessment with the widely used conventional visuospatial neglect tests currently employed in clinical practice. The validation process serves to establish the accuracy and reliability of our model, confirming its potential as a valuable tool for diagnosing and monitoring visuospatial neglect. Our VR application proves to be more sensitive, while intra-rater reliability remains high.

Is recalibration more important than realignment in prism adaptation training for visuospatial neglect? A randomized controlled trial.

Prism adaptation training (PAT) as a treatment for visuospatial neglect (VSN) involves two components: recalibration and realignment. We conducted a randomized controlled trial with PAT protocols requiring different degrees of recalibration and realignment, by using a single or multi-step protocol and varying visibility of the pointing movement. Twenty-five VSN patients received an alertness treatment without prisms, followed by four PAT protocols, encompassing a multi- or single-step procedure with terminal exposure, a single-step procedure with concurrent exposure, and sham PAT, presented in random order. The primary outcome parameter was the mean response time (RT) to left-sided targets in an endogenous variant of the Posner task, and we also measured the sensorimotor aftereffect. The two protocols without visibility of most of the movement trajectory produced significant aftereffects. The single-step protocol without movement visibility resulted in shorter RTs to left-sided targets. Hence, aftereffects depended on the partial invisibility of the movement. Moreover, only allowing VSN patients to recalibrate several times and direct feedback from the pointing errors had a beneficial effect on non-motor leftward visuospatial attention. We provide preliminary evidence that maximizing the conscious experience of movement errors may be an important component for remediating VSN.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register identifier: DRKS00025938.

Does visuospatial neglect contribute to standing balance within the first 12 weeks post-stroke? A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Visuospatial neglect (VSN) has been suggested to limit standing balance improvement post-stroke. However, studies investigating this association longitudinally by means of repeated within-subject measurements early post-stroke are lacking. This prospective longitudinal cohort study evaluates the longitudinal association of egocentric and allocentric VSN severity with 1) standing balance independence and 2) postural control and weight-bearing asymmetry (WBA) during quiet standing, in the first 12 weeks post-stroke. METHODS: Thirty-six hemiplegic individuals after a first-ever unilateral stroke were evaluated at weeks 3, 5, 8 and 12 post-stroke. Egocentric and allocentric VSN severity were evaluated using the Broken Hearts Test. The standing unperturbed item of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS-s) was used to clinically evaluate standing independence. Posturographic measures included measures of postural control (mediolateral (ML)/anteroposterior (AP) net center-of-pressure velocities (COPvel)) and WBA during quiet standing. A linear mixed model was used to examine longitudinal associations between egocentric and allocentric VSN, and BBS-s, COPvel-ML, COPvel-AP and WBA within the first 12 weeks post-stroke. RESULTS: Egocentric (ß = -0.08, 95%CI[-0.15;-0.01], P = .029) and allocentric VSN severity (ß = -0.09, 95%CI[-0.15; -0.04], P = .002) were significant independent factors for BBS-s scores in the first 12 weeks post-stroke. Egocentric and allocentric VSN were no significant independent factors for COPvel-ML, COPvel-AP and WBA in the first 12 weeks post-stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Allocentric and egocentric VSN severity were significantly associated with decreased standing independence, but not impaired postural control or greater asymmetric weight-bearing, in the early subacute post-stroke phase. This may involve traditional VSN measures being not sensitive enough to detect fine-grained VSN deficits due to a ceiling effect between 5 and 8 weeks post-stroke, once the individual regains standing ability. Future studies may require more sensitive VSN measurements to detect such deficits. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov. unique identifier NCT05060458.

Do we need to consider head-on-body position, starting roll position and presence of visuospatial neglect when assessing perception of verticality after stroke?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Considering various factors that influence the accuracy of the Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) and Subjective Postural Vertical (SPV), standardization of assessment methods is needed. This retrospective study examined the contribution of Head-on-Body (HOB) position, starting roll position (SRP) and visuospatial neglect (VSN) to SVV and SPV constant errors (i.e. deviation from true vertical). Also, the contribution of HOB position and VSN presence to SVV and SPV variability (i.e. intra-individual consistency between trials) was assessed. METHODS: First-ever unilateral hemispheric stroke survivors (<85 years; <100 days post-stroke) were assessed with three HOB positions (neutral, contralesional, and ipsilesional) and seven starting positions (20°Contralesional to 20° ipsilesional) of the laser bar and tilt chair. Linear mixed models were selected to evaluate the contribution of HOB, SRP, and VSN to SVV/SPV constant errors and variability. RESULTS: Thirty-four subjects (24 VSN-/10 VSN+) were assessed. A tilted HOB position led to significantly higher constant errors for the SVV and SPV (the latter only in the VSN- group), and an increased SVV variability. SRP only significantly contributed to the SVV constant errors and only in the VSN- group. Furthermore, the presence of VSN resulted in a significantly higher SVV and SPV variability. CONCLUSIONS: HOB position and the presence of SRP and VSN are important factors to consider during SVV and SPV measurements. Assessment with a neutral HOB position leads to more accurate results. HOB position and SRP influence the results of SVV and SPV differently in individuals with and without VSN, which highlights the relevance of VSN assessment.

Immersive virtual reality gameplay detects visuospatial atypicality, including unilateral spatial neglect, following brain injury: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: In neurorehabilitation, problems with visuospatial attention, including unilateral spatial neglect, are prevalent and routinely assessed by pen-and-paper tests, which are limited in accuracy and sensitivity. Immersive virtual reality (VR), which motivates a much wider (more intuitive) spatial behaviour, promises new futures for identifying visuospatial atypicality in multiple measures, which reflects cognitive and motor diversity across individuals with brain injuries. METHODS: In this pilot study, we had 9 clinician controls (mean age 43 years; 4 males) and 13 neurorehabilitation inpatients (mean age 59 years; 9 males) recruited a mean of 41 days post-injury play a VR visual search game. Primary injuries included 7 stroke, 4 traumatic brain injury, 2 other acquired brain injury. Three patients were identified as having left sided neglect prior to taking part in the VR. Response accuracy, reaction time, and headset and controller raycast orientation quantified gameplay. Normative modelling identified the typical gameplay bounds, and visuospatial atypicality was defined as gameplay beyond these bounds. RESULTS: The study found VR to be feasible, with only minor instances of motion sickness, positive user experiences, and satisfactory system usability. Crucially, the analytical method, which emphasized identifying 'visuospatial atypicality,' proved effective. Visuospatial atypicality was more commonly observed in patients compared to controls and was prevalent in both groups of patients-those with and without neglect. CONCLUSION: Our research indicates that normative modelling of VR gameplay is a promising tool for identifying visuospatial atypicality after acute brain injury. This approach holds potential for a detailed examination of neglect.

Comprehensive voxel-wise, tract-based, and network lesion mapping reveals unique architectures of right and left visuospatial neglect.

Visuospatial neglect is a common, post-stroke cognitive impairment which is widely considered to be a disconnection syndrome. However, the patterns of disconnectivity associated with visuospatial neglect remain unclear. Here, we had 480 acute stroke survivors [age = 72.8 (SD = 13.3), 44.3% female, 7.5 days post-stroke (SD = 11.3)] undertake routine clinical imaging and standardised visuospatial neglect testing. The data were used to conduct voxel-wise, tract-level, and network-level lesion-mapping analyses aimed at localising the neural correlates of left and right egocentric (body-centred) and allocentric (object-centred) visuospatial neglect. Only minimal anatomical homogeneity was present between the correlates of right and left egocentric neglect across all analysis types. This finding challenges previous work suggesting that right and left visuospatial neglect are anatomically homologous, and instead suggests that egocentric neglect may involve damage to a shared, but hemispherically asymmetric attention network. By contrast, egocentric and allocentric neglect was associated with disconnectivity in a distinct but overlapping set of network edges, with both deficits related to damage across the dorsal and ventral attention networks. Critically, this finding suggests that the distinction between egocentric and allocentric neglect is unlikely to reflect a simple dichotomy between dorsal versus ventral networks dysfunction, as is commonly asserted. Taken together, the current findings provide a fresh perspective on the neural circuitry involved in regulating visuospatial attention, and provide important clues to understanding the cognitive and perceptual processes involved in this common and debilitating neuropsychological syndrome.

Treating Visual Inattention in Acute Stroke Survivors Using a Therapy Scanning Wall: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Background: Visual inattention is common following right hemisphere stroke, with up to 80% of patients being affected. Visual inattention following stroke is linked to poorer outcomes. There is no clear evidence for how visual inattention should be treated in the hospital inpatient setting. Objective: To explore the practical implications and possible benefits of using a visual scanning wall in a stroke rehabilitation unit as an assessment and treatment tool for visual inattention. Methods: This proof-of-concept study recruited stroke survivors with visual inattention. Participants used the scanning wall for scanning training five days a week for two weeks. Assessments using the scanning wall and modified Albert's test were conducted at baseline and at day 14. Both participants and staff delivering the training were asked to complete an acceptability questionnaire. Results: All participants demonstrated an improvement in the number of pictures identified from baseline to day 14. There was a mean improvement of 9.20 (95% CI 4.77 to 13.63) in the 14 days. This is a statistically significant improvement in the scanning wall score between baseline line and day 14 (p = 0.01). All participants and staff reported the scanning wall as acceptable to use. Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study has demonstrated the scanning wall could be used to assess for visual inattention in extra personal space. Also, it could be beneficial and is acceptable for the treatment of visual inattention within a hospital inpatient setting for acute stroke survivors.

Directional and general impairments in initiating motor responses after stroke.

Visuospatial neglect is a disorder characterized by an impairment of attention, most commonly to the left side of space in individuals with stroke or injury to the right hemisphere. Clinical diagnosis is largely based on performance on pen and paper examinations that are unable to accurately measure the speed of processing environmental stimuli-important for interacting in our dynamic world. Numerous studies of impairment after visuospatial neglect demonstrate delayed reaction times when reaching to the left. However, little is known of the visuospatial impairment in other spatial directions and, further, the influence of the arm being assessed. In this study, we quantify the ability of a large cohort of 204 healthy control participants (females = 102) and 265 individuals with stroke (right hemisphere damage = 162, left hemisphere damage = 103; mean age 62) to generate goal-directed reaches. Participants used both their contralesional and ipsilesional arms to perform a centre-out visually guided reaching task in the horizontal plane. We found that the range of visuospatial impairment can vary dramatically across individuals with some individuals displaying reaction time impairments restricted to a relatively small portion of the workspace, whereas others displayed reaction time impairments in all spatial directions. Reaction time impairments were observed in individuals with right or left hemisphere lesions (48% and 30%, respectively). Directional impairments commonly rotated clockwise when reaching with the left versus the right arms. Impairment in all spatial directions was more prevalent in right than left hemisphere lesions (32% and 12%, respectively). Behavioral Inattention Test scores significantly correlated (r = -0.49, P < 0.005) with reaction time impairments but a large portion of individuals not identified as having visuospatial neglect on the Behavioral Inattention Test still displayed reaction time impairments (35%). MRI and CT scans identified distinct white matter and cortical regions of damage for individuals with directional (insula, inferior frontal-occipital fasciculus and inferior longitudinal fasciculus) and general (superior and middle temporal gyri) visuospatial impairment. This study highlights the prevalence and diversity of visuospatial impairments that can occur following stroke.

The neuroanatomy of visuospatial neglect: A systematic review and analysis of lesion-mapping methodology.

While visuospatial neglect is commonly associated with damage to the right posterior parietal cortex, neglect is an anatomically heterogenous syndrome. This project presents a systematic review of 34 lesion-mapping studies reporting on the anatomical correlates of neglect. Specifically, the reported correlates of egocentric versus allocentric, acute versus chronic, personal versus extra-personal, and left versus right hemisphere neglect are summarised. The quality of each included lesion-mapping analysis was then evaluated to identify methodological factors which may help account for the reported variance in correlates of neglect. Overall, the existing literature strongly suggests that egocentric and allocentric neglect represent anatomically dissociable conditions and that the anatomy of these conditions may not be entirely homologous across hemispheres. Studies which have compared the anatomy of acute versus chronic neglect have found that these conditions are associated with distinct lesion loci, while studies comparing the correlates of peripersonal/extrapersonal neglect are split as to whether these neglect subtypes are anatomically dissociable. The included studies employed a wide range of lesion-mapping analysis techniques, each producing results of varying quality and generalisability. This review concludes that the reported underlying anatomical correlates of heterogeneous visuospatial neglect vary considerably. Future, high quality studies are needed to investigate patterns of disconnection associated with clearly defined forms of visuospatial neglect in large and representative samples.

Visuospatial perception is not affected by self-related information.

Previous research suggests that attention is drawn by self-related information. Three online experiments were conducted to investigate whether self-related stimuli alter visuospatial perceptual judgments. In a matching task, associations were learned between labels ('Yourself'/friend/stranger's name) paired with cues. Cues were coloured outlines (Experiment 1, N = 135), geometric shapes (Experiment 2, N = 102), or coloured gradients (Experiment 3, N = 110). Visuospatial perception bias was measured with a greyscales task. Cues were presented prior to, and/or alongside greyscales. We hypothesized there would be a bias towards the self-related cue. In all experiments, we found a self-related bias in the matching task. Furthermore, there was an overall leftward visuospatial perceptual bias (pseudoneglect). However, we found anecdotal to moderate evidence for the absence of an effect of self-related cues on visuospatial perception judgments. Although self-related stimuli influence how our attention is oriented to stimuli, attention mechanisms that influence perceptual judgements are seemingly not affected by a self-bias.

Study protocol of transcranial electrical stimulation at alpha frequency applied during rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial in chronic stroke patients with visuospatial neglect.

BACKGROUND: A frequent post stroke disorder in lateralized attention is visuospatial neglect (VSN). As VSN has a strong negative impact on recovery in general and independence during daily life, optimal treatment is deemed urgent. Next to traditional stroke treatment, non-invasive brain stimulation offers the potential to facilitate stroke recovery as a complementary approach. In the present study, visual scanning training (VST; the current conventional treatment) will be combined with transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to evaluate the additive effects of repeated sessions of tACS in combination with six-weeks VST rehabilitation. METHODS: In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled intervention study (RCT), we will compare the effects of active tACS plus VST to sham (placebo) tACS plus VST, both encompassing 18 VST training sessions, 40 minutes each, during 6 weeks. Chronic stroke patients with VSN (> 6 months post-stroke onset) are considered eligible for study participation. In total 22 patients are needed for the study. The primary outcome is change in performance on a cancellation task. Secondary outcomes are changes in performance on a visual detection task, two line bisection tasks, and three measures to assess changes in activities of daily living. Assessment is at baseline, directly after the first and ninth training session, after the last training session (post training), and 1 week and 3 months after termination of the training (follow-up). DISCUSSION: If effective, a tACS-VST rehabilitation program could be implemented as a treatment option for VSN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ; registration number: NCT05466487; registration date: July 18, 2022 retrospectively registered; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05466487.

Transcranial alternating brain stimulation at alpha frequency reduces hemispatial neglect symptoms in stroke patients

Background/Objective: Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may help alleviate attention deficits in stroke patients with hemispatial neglect by modulating oscillatory brain activity. We applied high-definition (HD)-tACS at alpha frequency over the contralesional hemisphere to support unilateral oscillatory alpha activity and correct for the pathologically altered attention bias in neglect patients.Methods: We performed a within-subject, placebo-controlled study in which sixteen stroke patients with hemispatial neglect underwent 10 Hz (alpha) as well as sham (placebo) stimulation targeting the contralesional posterior parietal cortex. Attentional bias was measured with a computerized visual detection paradigm and two standard paper-and-pencil neglect tests.Results: We revealed a significant shift of attentional resources after alpha-HD-tACS, but not sham tACS, toward the ipsilateral and thus contralesional hemifield leading to a reduction in neglect symptoms, measured with a computerized visual detection paradigm and a widely used standard paper and pencil neglect tests.Conclusions: We showed a significant alpha-HD-tACS-induced shift of attentional resources toward the contralesional hemifield, thus leading to a reduction in neglect symptoms. Importantly, HD-tACS effects persisted after the stimulation itself had ended. This tACS protocol, based on intrinsic oscillatory processes, may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for neglect. (AU)

Resting-state electroencephalography changes in poststroke patients with visuospatial neglect.

Background: This study aimed to explore the electrophysiological characteristics of resting-state electroencephalography (rsEEG) in patients with visuospatial neglect (VSN) after stroke. Methods: A total of 44 first-event sub-acute strokes after right hemisphere damage (26 with VSN and 18 without VSN) were included. Besides, 18 age-matched healthy participants were used as healthy controls. The resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) of 64 electrodes was recorded to obtain the power of the spectral density of different frequency bands. The global delta/alpha ratio (DAR), DAR over the affected hemispheres (DARAH), DAR over the unaffected hemispheres (DARUH), and the pairwise-derived brain symmetry index (pdBSI; global and four bands) were compared between groups and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted. The Barthel index (BI), Fugl-Meyer motor function assessment (FMA), and Berg balance scale (BBS) were used to assess the functional state of patients. Visuospatial neglect was assessed using a battery of standardized tests. Results: We found that patients with VSN performed poorly compared with those without VSN. Analysis of rsEEG revealed increased delta and theta power and decreased alpha and beta power in stroke patients with VSN. Compared to healthy controls and poststroke non-VSN patients, patients with VSN showed a higher DAR (P < 0.001), which was significantly positively correlated with the BBS (DAR: r = -0.522, P = 0.006; DARAH: r = -0.521, P = 0.006; DARUH: r = -0.494, P = 0.01). The line bisection task was positively correlated with DAR (r = 0.458, P = 0.019) and DARAH (r = 0.483, P = 0.012), while the star cancellation task was only positively correlated with DARAH (r = 0.428, P = 0.029). DARAH had the best discriminating value between VSN and non-VSN, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.865. Patients with VSN showed decreased alpha power in the parietal and occipital areas of the right hemisphere. A higher parieto-occipital pdBSIalpha was associated with a worse line bisection task (r = 0.442, P = 0.024). Conclusion: rsEEG may be a useful tool for screening for stroke patients with visuospatial neglect, and DAR and parieto-occipital pdBSIalpha may be useful biomarkers for visuospatial neglect after stroke.

Transcranial alternating brain stimulation at alpha frequency reduces hemispatial neglect symptoms in stroke patients.

Background/Objective: Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may help alleviate attention deficits in stroke patients with hemispatial neglect by modulating oscillatory brain activity. We applied high-definition (HD)-tACS at alpha frequency over the contralesional hemisphere to support unilateral oscillatory alpha activity and correct for the pathologically altered attention bias in neglect patients. Methods: We performed a within-subject, placebo-controlled study in which sixteen stroke patients with hemispatial neglect underwent 10 Hz (alpha) as well as sham (placebo) stimulation targeting the contralesional posterior parietal cortex. Attentional bias was measured with a computerized visual detection paradigm and two standard paper-and-pencil neglect tests. Results: We revealed a significant shift of attentional resources after alpha-HD-tACS, but not sham tACS, toward the ipsilateral and thus contralesional hemifield leading to a reduction in neglect symptoms, measured with a computerized visual detection paradigm and a widely used standard paper and pencil neglect tests. Conclusions: We showed a significant alpha-HD-tACS-induced shift of attentional resources toward the contralesional hemifield, thus leading to a reduction in neglect symptoms. Importantly, HD-tACS effects persisted after the stimulation itself had ended. This tACS protocol, based on intrinsic oscillatory processes, may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for neglect.

Aligning formal and functional assessments of Visuospatial Neglect: A mixed-methods study.

ABSTRACTThe occurrence of visuospatial neglect acts as a key predictor of recovery outcome following stroke. However, the specific behavioural profiles associated with various neglect subtypes are not well understood. This study aims to identify real-world functional impairments associated with neglect, to determine whether functional impairment profiles differ across patients with egocentric and allocentric neglect, and to investigate how neglect severity predicts functional impairments.Notes from 290 stroke patients' occupational therapy functional assessments were qualitatively and quantitatively analysed in the context of neglect type and severity as reported by the OCS Cancellation Task. Overall, neglect patients had more references to having difficulty initiating tasks, finding items, exhibiting spatial inattention, and having difficulty using both arms than patients without neglect. The proportion of theme references did not differ significantly across patients with egocentric and allocentric neglect. The quantitative severity of egocentric neglect was acted as a significant predictor of reference occurrence over and above stroke severity within difficulty finding items, spatial inattention, body inattention, and upper limb use.This study expands on previous findings by identifying real-world functional impairments differentiating patients with and without neglect. This data provides novel insight into the impact of neglect on functional abilities.

The 3s Spreadsheet Test version 2 for assessing egocentric viewer-centered and allocentric stimulus-centered spatial neglect.

The present study established the norms of the 3 s Spreadsheet Test version 2 (3S-v2 Test) with 186 healthy adults, compared performance of 23 individuals with spatial neglect after right brain stroke to the norms, and examined the extent that allocentric neglect is independent from egocentric neglect. The task required in the 3S-v2 Test is to cross out the target digit "3" in a spreadsheet that contained 10 columns and 14 rows of digit strings, including 120 target digits and 720 non-target digits. Each target is categorized with respect to its location on the page (egocentric viewer-centered) and its position within the digit string (allocentric stimulus-centered). Patients completed the 3S-v2 Test, the Apples Test, and Scene Copying Test (a five-object figure copying test). Based on the neglect classification criteria of these three tests, 18 patients (78.3%) were identified with both forms of neglect, three patients (13.0%) had isolated egocentric neglect, and two (8.7%) had isolated allocentric neglect. Among patients who were determined as having allocentric neglect by a given test, we found no significant correlation between severity of allocentric neglect and stimulus location in the egocentric reference frame. Based on the present findings, we suggest that including the 3S-v2 Test, a functionally relevant task and different from the currently available tests, may increase the comprehensiveness of neglect assessment. In addition, allocentric neglect symptoms are independent of egocentric locations.

Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect Subtypes and Relationship to Functional Outcome Six Months After Stroke.

Background/Objective. This study aims to investigate how complex visuospatial neglect behavioural phenotypes predict long-term outcomes, both in terms of neglect recovery and broader functional outcomes after 6 months post-stroke. Methods. This study presents a secondary cohort study of acute and 6-month follow-up data from 400 stroke survivors who completed the Oxford Cognitive Screen's Cancellation Task. At follow-up, patients also completed the Stroke Impact Scale questionnaire. These data were analysed to identify whether any specific combination of neglect symptoms is more likely to result in long-lasting neglect or higher levels of functional impairment, therefore warranting more targeted rehabilitation. Results. Overall, 98/142 (69%) neglect cases recovered by follow-up, and there was no significant difference in the persistence of egocentric/allocentric (X2 [1] = .66 and P = .418) or left/right neglect (X2 [2] = .781 and P = .677). Egocentric neglect was found to follow a proportional recovery pattern with all patients demonstrating a similar level of improvement over time. Conversely, allocentric neglect followed a non-proportional recovery pattern with chronic neglect patients exhibiting a slower rate of improvement than those who recovered. A multiple regression analysis revealed that the initial severity of acute allocentric, but not egocentric, neglect impairment acted as a significant predictor of poor long-term functional outcomes (F [9,300] = 4.742, P < .001 and adjusted R2 = .098). Conclusions. Our findings call for systematic neuropsychological assessment of both egocentric and allocentric neglect following stroke, as the occurrence and severity of these conditions may help predict recovery outcomes over and above stroke severity alone.

Repeated application of the covert shift of attention task improves endogenous but not exogenous attention in patients with unilateral visuospatial inattention.

BACKGROUND: Most neglect treatment studies focus on automatic re-orientation procedures, assuming a deficit in automatic processes. We compare an automatic- and a controlled procedure, using the endogenous and exogenous variants of Posner's covert shift of attention task. METHOD: In two experiments, neglect patients and patients with a right hemispherical stroke without neglect performed three blocks of Posner's covert shift of attention task (Posner Task) on two days. In Study 1 we used endogenous cues, in Study 2, exogenous cues. RESULTS: In the endogenous task, neglect patients improved significantly with valid left-sided cues between block 1 and 2 on Day 1, subsequently showing a plateauing. They also showed a gradual improvement on invalid trials on both days. In the exogenous condition, all participants responded only increasingly faster on trials with a long stimulus onset asynchrony. Practicing on both tasks led to fewer omissions for left-sided targets, minimally in the exogenous and clearly in the endogenous condition. CONCLUSION: In line with prior neuroanatomical studies, our study shows that practicing an endogenous, but not an exogenous, visuospatial attention task leads to significant improvements in neglect patients, especially for invalid trials, suggesting that neglect treatments based on top-down strategies should be given more attention.

Blinding in electric current stimulation in subacute neglect patients with current densities of 0.8 A/m2: a cross-over pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Neglect after stroke is a disabling disorder and its rehabilitation is a major challenge. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) seems to be a promising adjuvant technique to improve standard care neglect therapy. Since electric fields are influenced by age-related factors, higher current densities are probably needed for effective treatment in aged stroke patients. Validation of treatment efficacy requires sham-controlled experiments, but increased current densities might comprise blinding. Therefore, a pilot study was conducted to test sham adequacy when using current density of 0.8 A/m2. Whether especially neglect patients who mainly suffer from perceptual and attentional deficits are able to differentiate beyond chance active from sham tDCS was investigated in a randomized cross-over design (active/sham stimulation) in 12 early subacute patients with left-sided hemineglect. Stimulation (0.8 A/m2) was performed simultaneous to standard care neglect therapy. RESULTS: Odds ratio of correct guessing an atDCS condition compared to wrongly judge an atDCS condition as sham was 10.00 (95%CI 0.65-154.40, p = 0.099). However, given the small sample size and high OR, although likely somewhat overestimated, results require careful interpretation and blinding success in neglect studies with current densities of 0.8 A/m2 should be further confirmed.