A Multi-Center Study on the Implementation and Challenges of Nursing Three-Level Ward Rounds in Tertiary Hospitals in Shanxi Province.

Background: The "Key Points of the Core System of Medical Quality and Safety" (hereinafter referred to as the "Key Points") was promulgated by the National Health Commission of China in 2018, requiring that nursing ward rounds should be carried out with reference to the three-level ward round system; In 2020 and 2022 editions of the "Evaluation Standards for Tertiary Hospitals", which were implemented in China, required that nursing ward rounds should be carried out with reference to the "Key Points". Additionally, the Action Plan for Comprehensively Improving Medical Quality (2023-2025) also mentions the need to improve the quality of three-level ward rounds. However, there are no detailed guidelines regarding implementing "Nursing Three-level Ward Rounds". Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the current situation of nursing three-level ward rounds in tertiary hospitals after the promulgation of the "Key Points of the Core System of Medical Quality and Safety" to provide insights and guidelines regarding relevant standards, so as to better implement of the requirements of "nursing ward rounds" in the "Evaluation Standards for Tertiary Hospitals" and "improving the quality of three-level ward rounds" in the "Action Plan". Methods: A multi-center study was conducted in February 2024, including all tertiary public hospitals in the Shanxi Province, China. A questionnaire survey using the self-designed "Questionnaire on the Implementation of Nursing Three-level Ward Rounds" was carried out. The questionnaire included the basic information of the hospital and the implementation of the three-level (namely I, II, and III) rounds (including "five aspects": ward round personnel, object, content, frequency, and record), which is expressed by quantity and composition ratio. Next is the text analysis method. First, the "five aspects" of the hospital that filled in the questionnaire survey with "nursing three-level ward rounds have been carried out" were assessed. Second, the five aspects of each hospital were assessed for consistency with the "Nursing Three-level Ward Rounds System" (hereinafter referred to as the "System") of their respective hospitals.Third, the consistency of the "System" of the hospital with the "Key Points" was assessed. The results of the analysis of the former are expressed in terms of quantity and composition ratio; the results of the latter two were analyzed using Fisher's exact test method to compare any differences. Results: Notably, 14 of the 67 tertiary public hospitals (20.9%) carried out nursing three-level ward rounds. There were 4-10 situations in the five aspects of I, II, and III ward rounds filled in by the hospitals. The five aspects of the I, II, III ward rounds in 14 hospitals were significantly comparable with the "System", which, in turn, was comparable with the "Key Points" (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Not all tertiary public hospitals in the Shanxi Province have not all carried out nursing three-level ward rounds. Furthermore, the five aspects of the hospitals that carried out nursing three-level ward rounds were not entirely consistent in terms of ward round personnel, object, content, frequency, and record. The filling in of the nursing three-level ward rounds carried out by the hospitals is inconsistent with the respective "System"; the "System" of the hospital is not in line with the "Key Points". Impact on Nursing Work: Nursing administrators should be aware of the newly issued norms and requirements in their workplace, and revise the relevant systems in accordance with the norms and requirements in a timely manner. Additionally, the revision of the system should cover the core requirements of the norms and be practicable. The system should be supervised to ensure that 100% of the implementation is in accordance with the system.

Live Streaming of the Professor's Ward Rounds in Undergraduate Neurology Education: Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: Although neurology department ward rounds are among the most important medical education exercises in Japan, they have several issues. Patients may find it unpleasant to undergo repeated neurological tests, especially when in the presence of several students. Only the front row of students can closely observe the examination findings; moreover, students were prohibited from contacting patients altogether during the COVID-19 pandemic. One possible solution is to use commercial videoconferencing systems. However, Japanese patients are reluctant to have their medical information or video footage of them sent outside of the hospital via the internet. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to confirm the feasibility of conducting remote teaching rounds using an in-house web conferencing system in which the patients' personal data are securely protected. This study also explored whether using remote rounds alongside face-to-face participation would enhance learning. METHODS: We created an on-premises videoconferencing system using an open-source app. To perform video ward rounds, the professor wore a wireless microphone while leading routine in-person rounds and the attending physician carried a tablet device linked to a web conference, allowing students in another room to watch the rounds on a live stream. In total, 112 of 5th-year students who entered their 1-week neurology rotation between 2021 and 2022 were instructed to participate in 1-hour in-person and remote rounds. Students were given questionnaires to evaluate their satisfaction and the educational effects of the remote rounds. RESULTS: The remote ward rounds were conducted easily with no interference with the in-person rounds, nor any complaints from the patients. Each examination technique was explained by another teacher to the students who participated in remote rounds in the conference room. Characteristic neurological findings, such as plantar reflexes (Babinski sign), which are usually seen only by close observers during in-person rounds, could be visualized under magnification by all students. The postexperience survey (82/112, 73% response rate) showed that the mean score of participants' satisfaction was 3.94 (SD 0.83; excellent 5 and poor 1). No participant scoring 1 was noted. The proportion of students who observed 6 representative abnormal neurological findings (Babinski sign, hyperreflexia, cerebellar ataxia, involuntary movement, muscular weakness, and abnormality in sensory examination) increased by 22% (18/82, range 13-24) compared to in-person rounds alone. When self-rating the learning value, 43% (35/82) of the students answered that remote rounds are equally as valuable as in-person rounds, while 32% (26/82) preferred remote rounds. CONCLUSIONS: Live-streaming of neurology ward rounds using a secure in-house web conferencing system provides additional learning experience without concerns regarding leakage of patient information. This initiative could enhance neurology learning before entering a clinical clerkship.

[Wearable Smart Cardiac Care: Take Vipasyana for Example].

The most direct challenge to the healthcare system in Taiwan associated with population aging is the chronic and growing shortfall in medical and nursing practitioners. The integration of artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, and advanced 5G communication technologies is making healthcare more streamlined and intuitive to improve healthcare service efficiency, encourage cross-disciplinary cooperation to improve patient health management, and introduce and mainstream innovative service models such as telecare. To this end, the wearable smart cardiac care system 'Vipasyana', jointly developed by the interdisciplinary research team of the Departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, not only has an innovative fully functional wireless wearable electrocardiograph but also uses machine learning-based detection/prediction methods to detect and monitor for emergencies such as myocardial infarction, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, and heart failure. To handle the real-time streaming sensing data generated during clinical trials, a big data real-time streaming framework based on Apache Storm and microservices has also been integrated. In addition, a mobile phone app and virtual reality 3D ward round system providing a user-friendly management and monitoring tool for medical staffs were developed and integrated into the system. The 'Vipasyana' system is capable of providing precision medical services to individual patients.

Exploration of 'micro' level factors that affect the involvement of clinical pharmacists in interprofessional ward rounds in hospitals: Through the lens of social cognitive theory.

BACKGROUND: Macro and meso level factors that influence the participation by clinical pharmacists in ward rounds include pharmacy management culture, commitment to ward rounds and adequate time for ward rounds being included in workload models. The 'micro' level factors that affect the involvement of clinical pharmacists in ward rounds have not been widely explored. OBJECTIVE: Explore 'micro' level factors to gain insight into clinical pharmacists' participation in interprofessional ward rounds in inpatient settings through the lens of social cognitive theory. METHOD: A qualitative focused ethnographic study with five clinical pharmacists, four medical practitioners, one allied health professional and one nurse was conducted in three metropolitan hospitals in Southern Australia. Seven hours of semi-structured interview (n = 11) and 76-h of observations (n = 5) were conducted. A qualitative descriptive analysis was conducted (guided by Spradley) followed by reflexive thematic-analysis (according to Braun and Clarke's technique). RESULTS: Three micro level factors influencing clinical pharmacist participation in ward rounds are: (1) Cognitive mindset of clinical pharmacists, (2) Behavioural conduct of clinical pharmacists, and (3) Social rules of the ward. Clinical pharmacists that did not participate in ward round reconciled their moral distress by transferring information without clinical judgement or interpretation of the patient scenario to medical practitioners. Clinical pharmacists that did participate in ward rounds demonstrated credibility by making relevant recommendations with a holistic lens. This enabled clinical pharmacists to be perceived as trustworthy by medical practitioners. Positive experiences of participating in ward rounds contributed to their cognitive upward spiral of thoughts and emotions, fostering continued participation. CONCLUSION: Clinical pharmacists participate in ward rounds when they develop a positive mindset about ward round participation and perceive ward rounds as an enabler to the establishment of trusted professional relationships with medical practitioners. This trusted relationship creates an environment where the pharmacist develops confidence in making relevant recommendations.

Effectiveness analysis of life support equipment in clinical assisted decision-making under the background of intelligent intensive care unit construction / 中国医学装备

Objective:Based on the construction of intelligent intensive care unit(ICU)in hospital,to analyze the effectiveness of intelligent ICU life support equipment in clinical decision-making assistance.Methods:The functional modules of the ICU ward interaction system,equipment management system,risk response system and intelligent ward round system were designed to collect information and data of life support equipment in diagnosis and treatment,nursing,operation and technical support in real time to provide medical auxiliary decision-making basis for the improvement of diagnosis,treatment and nursing measures for critically ill patients.115 life-support equipment in clinical use in 3 hospitals including Zhujiajiao People's Hospital of Qingpu District,Shanghai from July 1,2018 to December 31,2022 were selected,the traditional assisted decision-making management mode(referred to as traditional mode,83 sets)and intelligent assisted decision-making management mode(referred to as intelligent mode,89 sets,including 57 units of the traditional mode and 32 newly added units)were adopted respectively.The management level and management effect of life support equipment of the two management modes were compared.Results:The data collection time of the equipment of intelligent mode was(5.67±2.80)min,which was less than that of the traditional mode,the accuracy and completeness of data acquisition,as well as the effective resolution rate of equipment deployment and use,monitoring and alarm,equipment failure and emergency response were(99.02±1.14)%,(94.35±3.46)%,(98.78±0.90)%,(98.99±0.91)%,(88.26±5.31)% and(90.23±5.54)%,respectively,which were higher than those of the traditional mode,the difference between was statistically significant(t=6.504,6.474,3.574,7.620,6.784,4.522,3.719,P<0.05).The effective utilization rates of diagnostic decisions for treatment,care and rehabilitation of intelligent mode equipment were(93.83±3.12)%,(94.99±2.47)% and(91.44±4.62)%,respectively,the comprehensive scores of respiratory function support equipment,circulatory function support equipment,blood purification support equipment and emergency monitoring support equipment were(92.97±4.35)points,(94.34±2.95)points,(93.01±2.44)points and(94.11±1.89)points,respectively,which were higher than those of the traditional mode,the difference was statistically significant(t=4.169,4.875,5.159,4.069,3.033,2.757,6.893,P<0.05).Conclusion:Based on the construction of intelligent ICU,it can improve the quality of life support equipment operation data collection,solve the equipment operation problems in a timely manner,provide an effective basis for the decision-making of diagnosis and treatment,nursing and rehabilitation of critically ill patients,and improve the clinical service level of equipment.

Improving Thoracic Surgery Ward Round Quality and Enhancing Patient Safety in a Referral Centre.

Introduction Ward rounds are vital clinical processes that facilitate an opportunity for daily review and management of thoracic surgery inpatients. The aim of this study was to compare thoracic surgery ward round documentation against locally agreed standards and design a template to improve the detail and uniformity of this process to enhance patient care. Materials and methods Data for this audit was collected retrospectively and prospectively. Data was collected during three auditing periods and managed on Microsoft Excel. Descriptive statistics were used for its analysis. Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests were used to test for differences in reporting rates. Results and discussion Initially, a total of 199 ward round notes were reviewed. Imaging results (19%) and discharge planning (23%) were not reported. eCARE (electronic Clinical Assessment for Round Evaluation) was developed to ensure that all aspects of patient evaluation recommended by the guidelines were included. Reporting rates significantly improved after such changes. We analysed the effect of the new ward round note on discharge planning (23.3 vs 41%, p<0.001), complication rates (32.6 vs 21.9%, p=0.03), post-surgical length of stay (LOS) (7.0 vs 5.0, p<0.001). Conclusion Over a year, we audited the Thoracic Surgery Department's ward round documentation against locally agreed standards in line with national recommendations. Several important items were not regularly reported. Using closed-ended questions improved reporting rates, and patient care was optimised. Further research should explore the impact of this new documentation method on patient care and postoperative outcomes in our Trust as well as other cardiothoracic centres.

Evaluation of the feasibility of a video-transmitted surgical ward round: a proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical ward rounds are key element to point-of-care interprofessional postoperative treatment and technical and communicational aspects are relevant for the patient's safety and satisfaction. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, the training opportunity of experiencing a face-to-face surgical ward round was massively hampered and thus, we developed a digital concept. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of video-transmitted ward rounds integrating surgical and communicational aspects with live streaming from wards. Further, medical students were asked for their satisfaction and their subjective learning success. METHODS: The proof-of-concept study consisted of self-reported subjective evaluation of competences in ward round skills. Qualitative feedback was collected to gain deeper insight and students' empathy was rated by using the student version of the Jefferson Empathy Scale (JES). RESULTS: One hundred three medical students participated. The students were satisfied with the video-transmitted ward round (M = 3.54; SD = 1.22). In the subjective evaluation students' ward round competencies rose significantly (p < .001, Mpre = 3.00, SD = 0.77; Mpost = 3.76, SD = 0.75). The surgeon was rated as empathic (M = 119.05; SD = 10.09). In the qualitative feedback they named helpful aspects like including an expert for communication. However, they preferred the face-to-face setting in comparison to the digital concept. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to implement a video-transmitted ward round within a pandemic. The format worked technically, was well-accepted and also led to a subjective rise in the students' competencies. Video-transmitted ward rounds may be integrated to support the medical education, though, they cannot replace the face-to-face setting.

Exploring different stakeholders' perspectives on ward rounds in paediatric oncology: a qualitative study.

RATIONAL/AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Ward rounds are a core routine for interprofessional communication and clinical care planning: Health care professionals and patients meet regularly and it encourages patients to actively participate. In paediatric oncology, the long treatment process, the serious diagnosis, and involvement of both patients and their parents in shared-decision-making require specific ward round skills. Despite its high value for patient-centred care, a universal definition of ward round is lacking. Little is known about attitudes and expectations of different participants towards a 'good' ward round. This study aims to capture experiences and expectations of different stakeholders to better understand ward round needs in paediatric oncology and serve as a basis to improve future ward rounds. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients, parents, nurses and medical doctors of a paediatric oncology ward until theoretical saturation (13 interviews). A standardised qualitative analysis using the phenomenological framework defined by Colaizzi was used to identify important aspects in the interviews. RESULTS: Three major themes were identified in the interviews: [1] Structure and Organisation; [2] Communication; [3] Education. Further analysis revealed 23 categories and elucidated several opportunities and unmet needs recognized by stakeholders: Ward round functions in comforting families in stressful situations, and relationship building. Interviewees expressed their concerns about missing structures. Families pleaded for smaller ward round teams and layperson language. Health care professionals underscored the lack of ward round training. Paediatric patients stated that ward round scared them without proper explanation. All interviewees emphasized the need for professionalization of the ward round in the setting of paediatric oncology. CONCLUSION: This study gives important insights into ward round functions and organisational requirements. It addresses special challenges for ward round participants in paediatric oncology, such as consideration of the emotional aspect of cancer treatment or the limits of shared decision making. Furthermore, this study underscores the great significance of ward rounds in paediatric oncology, with an emphasis on communication and relationship-building. Although performed universally, ward rounds are poorly explored or evaluated. This structured analysis synthesizes important expectations of different WR stakeholders, revealing opportunities of improvement and stressing the need for guidelines, training, and preparation.

Patients' experiences of clinical team meetings (ward rounds) at an adult in-patient eating disorders ward: mixed-method service improvement project.

AIMS: Ward rounds are key to treatment-related decision-making, but are often stressful. This project aimed to explore and improve patients' experiences of the clinical team meeting (CTM; historically known as ward round) in an adult in-patient eating disorders unit. A mixed-method approach was adopted with in vivo observations, two focus groups and an interview. Six patients participated. Two former patients contributed to data analysis, co-production of service improvement initiatives and write-up. RESULTS: The mean CTM duration was 14.3 min. Patients spoke half of the time, followed by psychiatry colleagues. 'Request' was the most discussed category. Three themes were identified: CTMs are important but impersonal, a sense of palpable anxiety was generated and staff and patients had divergent views regarding CTM goals. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The co-produced changes to CTMs were implemented and improved patient's experiences despite COVID-19 challenges. Factors beyond CTMs, including the ward's power hierarchy, culture and language, need addressing to facilitate shared decision-making.

The Effectiveness of Student-Led Ward Round Training on Knowledge Acquisition, Critical Thinking Ability, and Self-Confidence of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding for Nursing Students.

Introduction: Nursing knowledge, critical thinking ability, and self-perceived confidence are imperative to nursing skills in professional nursing practice. Therefore, nurse educators are required to use teaching strategies that will help promote their knowledge, critical thinking, and self-confidence in complex contents such as the nursing of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB). Purpose: This study compares the effect of student-led and instructor-led ward-round training methods on knowledge acquisition, critical thinking ability, and self-perceived confidence during AUGIB sessions. Methods: Forty nursing students in the first year of the Emergency Nursing Residency Program were randomly divided into a student-led ward round training group (SG) and an instructor-led ward round training group (IG) with a ratio of 1:1. A knowledge quiz, critical thinking ability test, and self-perceived confidence questionnaire were performed before and after the ward round training to assess both groups of students for their knowledge acquisition, critical thinking ability, and self-perceived confidence improvement. Feedback questionnaires were conducted after the training to evaluate students' perspectives and interests concerning the teaching module. Results: The scores of the post-training quiz were significantly higher than that of the pre-training quiz in both the SG (44.10±2.92 vs 31.10±4.27, p<0.001) and IG (32.35±2.21 vs 30.55±2.24, p=0.01). In the post-training quiz, scores achieved by the students from the SG (44.10±2.92) were significantly higher than those achieved by the students from the IG (32.35±2.21, p< 0.001). The level of self-perceived confidence improved significantly after ward round training in the SG (p< 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the IG with respect to the change from pre- to post-training (p=0.43).The students' critical thinking ability improved significantly in the SG (14.95±2.58 vs 7.10±1.79, p<0.001), while no significant improvement was found in the IG (7.91±2.28 vs 6.52±2.21, p=0.07) after ward round training. Conclusion: The teaching method of SWRT improves nursing students' knowledge acquisition, critical thinking ability, and self-perceived confidence in AUGIB.

Interdisciplinary collaborative working on surgical ward rounds: reality or rhetoric? A systematic review.

Daily surgical ward rounds shape the quality of postoperative care and contribute to positive patient outcomes. Despite their importance, strategies to facilitate and promote deliberate interdisciplinary collaboration within surgical ward rounds have not been comprehensively investigated. This paper systematically reviews the literature to identify what is known from existing publications about interdisciplinary working on surgical ward rounds. Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception until May 2021 for studies involving interdisciplinary surgical ward rounds. Also, journal hand searches were undertaken. All potential abstracts and papers were screened independently by two reviewers to determine inclusion. All included papers were assessed for methodological quality using the accepted quality criteria outlined in the BEME No. 1 guide. A modified Kirkpatrick model was employed to analyze and synthesize the included studies. The search identified 1765 studies. Reviews of 861 abstracts resulted in the retrieval of 124 articles for full-text screening. Thirty-two papers met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The levels of research evidence were low with 11 papers scoring either grade 4 (results are clear and very likely to be true) or grade 5 (results are unequivocal) in accordance with the BEME No. 1 guide. These 11 studies had three foci (1) full teams managing specific medical conditions through deliberate interdisciplinary collaboration on ward rounds (n = 5); (2) suggestions on the best format for interdisciplinary collaboration on ward rounds (n = 3); and, (3) the roles of specific disciplines in a collaborative surgical round (n = 3). Physicians, intensivists, and pediatricians embrace the benefits of interdisciplinary working to facilitate the improvement of communication, collaboration, and patient safety. Yet, persistent hierarchies within surgical wards act as a barrier often preventing allied health professionals from speaking up, thus perpetuating intra disciplinary siloed behaviors. This barrier contributes to a dearth of research evidence to facilitate interdisciplinary collaborative intentionality in surgical ward rounds and surgical education. Given the high-risk nature of surgery, interdisciplinary collaboration is a critical component for patient safety. Our findings serve as a call to action to address the rhetoric of interdisciplinary collaboration on surgical ward rounds. An evidence-base is required to design, educate for and implement interdisciplinary collaborative opportunities in surgical wards so this critical aspect of patient care becomes a reality.

Using instant messaging applications to promote clinical teaching of medical students.

BACKGROUND: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of Telegram as an Instant messaging application in clinical teaching of medical students, especially clinical ward rounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this quasi-experimental study, Telegram as an Instant messaging application was employed. To do this, a Telegram group entitled as "Lavender" was created and then selected patients were divided between students and externs daily. After that, students and externs were asked to take medical histories, perform complete physical examinations, and then share their data in the Lavender group. Ultimately, to evaluate the effects of this intervention, two quantitative and qualitative approaches were used. RESULTS: From the students' point of view the highest average was associated with "Readiness for teaching round" (3.71 ± 1.34) and the lowest average was related to "Time-saving for studying about illnesses" (2.08 ± 1.44). In addition, medical trainees mentioned that reporting patients' daily medical histories and progress notes could create a reflective process. The suggestion made by many medical trainees was to select and discuss simpler cases who have more teaching points for them, while other trainees recommended focusing on common illnesses in the Lavender group. CONCLUSION: The use of messaging software applications such as Telegram in medical education has created a new paradigm, which could facilitate interpersonal interactions among trainees.

A Standardized Ward Round Proforma Improves Documentation in a Specialist Stroke Unit.

Background and aim Ward-round documentation is important for clinical communication and patient safety. Standardized checklists have improved ward-round documentation in surgical and medical settings. This quality improvement project aimed to introduce a standardized ward round proforma to improve documentation in a UK specialist stroke unit. Methods Ward round entries were assessed against internally agreed standardized criteria. A stroke-specific ward round proforma was designed and introduced with input from the multidisciplinary team. A repeat audit was performed, including assessment of the use of different proforma sections. Multidisciplinary team members were invited to provide feedback via an anonymous online survey. Results A total of 111 ward round entries were reviewed before the proforma was introduced. Ninety-five ward round entries were reviewed following introduction of the proforma, and 84.2% of these used the proforma for documentation. Overall documentation of standardized criteria improved from 48.7% to 62.1% with substantial improvement seen in documentation of neurological examination, presence/absence of mechanical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and blood test results. Multidisciplinary team feedback was positive. Conclusions The stroke-specific ward round proforma improved the quality and consistency of documentation in the unit. An updated proforma was designed using these results and multidisciplinary team feedback.

Using a checklist within simulation improves trainees' confidence on ward rounds.

Ward rounds are integral to maintaining patient safety in everyday clinical care. Junior doctors are often expected to conduct independent rounds on graduation, but many feel ill-equipped to do so. We developed a safety checklist and simulation sessions to improve junior-led ward round practice at one district general hospital. We found that embedding a checklist within simulation is an effective way to teach ward round skills and increase confidence among undergraduate and postgraduate medical trainees.

The Ward Round: Patients' Perceptions of a Patient-Centered Approach and Their Suggestions for Improved Participation.

Purpose: To explore, through a learning activity for healthcare students, how patients perceived the ward round and its patient-centered approach. Patients and Methods: Patients admitted for elective orthopedic surgery were invited to participate in the study, which involved answering a survey comprising seven intersectional questions and eight free text questions. In addition, medical and nursing students did semi-structured interviews with the patients, covering the same free text questions. Twenty-three patients answered the survey, of whom fifteen also completed the interviews. The results from the interviews were explored using a thematic content analysis. Results: Forty-three percent (10/23) of the patients strongly agreed or agreed that their knowledge of patient-centered ward round was sufficient to be able to participate actively, and thirty percent (7/23) indicated they had good knowledge of the laws and regulations governing the care of patients. Most of the patients felt satisfied with how their own and their relatives' experiences were taken into account. The categories information and to be listened to were mentioned repeatedly by patients as priorities for patient-centered ward rounds. The interview analysis revealed four main categories: preparation, communication, organization, and safety as important and in need of improvement. Conclusion: Less than half of the patients surveyed felt they could participate in the ward round, which indicates that there is an opportunity for improvement and development. Better information and communication about legal rights, as well as about the structure and content of the ward round, could be valuable to patients before admission. It is also important to find a way for patients' individual wishes to be more fully and easily conveyed to medical staff. Creating a more tailor-made ward round for each patient and fulfilling a patient-centered approach will likely entail a substantial organizational and mental shift.

Improving the weekend spinal ward round at a major trauma centre.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Documentation is key for communicating between members of the multidisciplinary team, allowing for better care, but documentation for spinal patients in the authors' centre was poor. METHODS: Every ward round encounter was analysed for six weekends. Data were analysed and presented to the department. A weekend ward round proforma was designed to help improve ward-round documentation. Ward round entries were then re-audited over four weekends to assess the usefulness of the new proforma. RESULTS: A total of 69 patient encounters were analysed in cycle 1, 58 in cycle 2 and 92 in cycle 3. In cycle 1, 80% of encounters had inadequate documentation. Following introduction of the ward round proforma there was a significant improvement in documentation in six out of fields, which was maintained in four out of seven fields 2 years later. CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe that this improvement may avoid adverse effects on patient care, streamline doctors' time and reduce medicolegal consequences.

The ward round: friend or foe in postgraduate training? A grounded theory study of residents' perspectives.

The ward round has traditionally been a learning activity in medical education. Apart from education, ward rounds have multiple roles including patient care and communication. Some studies have described the ward round as an ideal place to learn patient management while others reported that little learning happens on rounds due to lack of time and patient volume. This study aimed to develop a deeper understanding of ward round learning from the perspective of postgraduate trainees. A constructivist grounded theory approach was used and data was collected during focus group discussions. Data were analyzed by initial coding, then grouped into focused codes and development of a theoretical framework by the process of constant comparison. Six categories evolved which contributed to the framework. Postgraduate trainees perceive the ward round as an important space where they use different learning activities to acquire knowledge, attitude and skills required of a specialist doctor. They progress from novices to experts under supervision of faculty who lead ward rounds. The round can achieve its full learning potential if planned and organized well but can become a missed opportunity if the learning environment is unfriendly. Patient- and learner-related barriers exist that hinder ward round learning. The framework explains how ward round learning occurs in postgraduate medical education from a trainee perspective. The findings can guide interventions to improve the learning experience. Studies comparing perspectives of teachers to those of learners are needed to further understand the complex learning milieu of the ward round.

Augmented video consultations in care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated an unprecedented implementation of remote consultations in UK primary care services. Specifically, older adults in care homes had a high need for infection prevention owing to their existing health conditions. GP practices in the East Midlands incorporated augmented video consultations (AVC) with the potential to support remote healthcare assessments for older adults at care homes. AIM: To explore GPs' and care home staff's experiences of the use of AVC as a mechanism to perform remote examinations of older adults in care homes. DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs and care home staff in the East Midlands, UK, during May-August 2020. METHOD: A convenience sample of GPs (n = 5), nurses (n = 12), and senior healthcare assistants (n = 3) were recruited using a purposive approach. Data were collected through semi-structured telephone interviews and analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS: Findings from participants indicated that AVC enabled real-time patient examinations to aid diagnosis and promoted person-centred care in meeting the needs of older adults. The participants also discussed the challenges of video consultations for patients with cognitive impairment and those receiving end-of-life care. CONCLUSION: AVCs show great potential in terms of GPs providing primary care services for care homes. However, healthcare staff must be involved in the development of the technology, and consideration should be given to the needs of older adults with cognitive impairment and those receiving end-of-life care. It is also vital that training is available to encourage confidence and competency in implementing the technology.

Conducting a good ward round: How do leaders do it?

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Ward rounds (WRs) are complex social processes. Done well, WR discussions and decisions contribute to timely, safe, effective progression of care. However, literature highlights medical dominance; marginalisation or absence of other perspectives, safety risks and suboptimal resource use. This study examined leadership behaviours and what supported good interprofessional WRs, defined as enabling interprofessional collaboration and decision making which progresses patient care in a safe and timely manner. Deepening appreciation of this art should support learning and improvements. METHOD: Mixed-method appreciative inquiry (AI) into how WRs go well and could go well more often. CONTEXT: daily interprofessional consultant-led WRs in a large adult critical care unit. DATA: ethnographic and structured observations (73 h, 348 patient reviews); AI conversations and interviews (71 participants). Inductive iterative analysis shaped by Activity Theory. PARTICIPANTS: 256 qualified healthcare professionals working in the unit. RESULTS: Leadership of good WRs supported (and minimized contradictions to): making good use of expertise and time, and effective communication. These three key activities required careful and skilled orchestration of contributions to each patient review, which was achieved through four distinct phases (a broadly predictable script), ensuring opportunity to contribute while maintaining focus and a productive pace. This expertise is largely tacit knowledge, learnt informally, which is difficult to analyse and articulate oneself, or explain to others. To make this easier, and thus support learning, we developed the metaphor of a conductor leading musicians. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst everyone contributes to the joint effort of delivering a good WR, WR leadership is key. It ensures effective use of time and diverse expertise, and coordinates contributions rather like a conductor working with musicians. Although WR needs and approaches vary across contexts, the key leadership activities we identified are likely to transfer to other settings.