Seasonal variation in blood pressure: what is still missing?

Seasonal variation of blood pressure (BP) is a topic in cardiology that has gained more attention throughout the years. Although it is extensively documented that BP increases in seasons coupled with lower temperatures, there are still many gaps in this knowledge field that need to be explored. Notably, seasonal variation of BP phenotypes, such as masked and white coat hypertension, and the impact of air pollution, latitude, and altitude on seasonal variation of BP are still poorly described in the literature, and the levels of the existing evidence are low. Therefore, further investigations on these topics are needed to provide robust evidence that can be used in clinical practice.

The impact of changing home blood pressure monitoring cutoff from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg on hypertension phenotypes.

This study investigated the impact of changing abnormal home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) cutoff from 135/85 to 130/80 mmHg on the prevalence of hypertension phenotypes, considering an abnormal office blood pressure cutoff of 140/90 mmHg. We evaluated 57 768 individuals (26 876 untreated and 30 892 treated with antihypertensive medications) from 719 Brazilian centers who performed HBPM. Changing the HBPM cutoff was associated with increases in masked (from 10% to 22%) and sustained (from 27% to 35%) hypertension, and decreases in white-coat hypertension (from 16% to 7%) and normotension (from 47% to 36%) among untreated participants, and increases in masked (from 11% to 22%) and sustained (from 29% to 36%) uncontrolled hypertension, and decreases in white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (from 15% to 8%) and controlled hypertension (from 45% to 34%) among treated participants. In conclusion, adoption of an abnormal HBPM cutoff of 130/80 mmHg markedly increased the prevalence of out-of-office hypertension and uncontrolled hypertension phenotypes.

White-coat and masked hypertension diagnoses in chronic kidney disease patients.

The purpose of this study was to analyze which 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) parameters should be used on masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension (WCH) diagnoses in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Non-dialysis CKD patients underwent 24-hour ABPM examination between 01/27/2004 and 02/16/2012. They were followed from the 24-hour ABPM to January/2014 in an observational study. The WCH definitions tested were as follows: (a) office blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90 mm Hg and daytime ABPM BP ≤ 135/85 mm Hg (old criterion); and (b) office BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg and 24-hour ABPM BP ≤ 130/80 mm Hg, daytime ABPM BP ≤ 135/85 mm Hg, and nighttime ABPM BP ≤ 120/70 mm Hg (new criterion). The MH definitions tested were as follows: (a) office BP < 140/90 mm Hg and daytime ABPM BP > 135/85 mm Hg (old criterion); and (b) office BP < 140/90 mm Hg and 24-hour ABPM BP > 130/80 mm Hg or daytime ABPM BP > 135/85 mm Hg or nighttime ABPM BP > 120/70 mm Hg (new criterion). The two definitions' predictive capacity was compared, regarding both WCH and MH. Cardiovascular mortality was the primary and all-cause mortality was the secondary outcome. Cox regression was adjusted to the variables: glomerular filtration rate, age, diabetes mellitus, and active smoking. There were 367 patients studied. The old criterion (exclusive mean daytime ABPM BP) was the only to distinguish sustained hypertension from WCH (adjusted HR: 3.730; 95% CI: 1.068-13.029; P = .039), regarding all-cause mortality. Additionally, the old criterion was the only one to distinguish normotension and MH, regarding cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR: 7.641; 95% CI: 1.277-45.738; P = .026). Therefore, WCH and MH definitions based exclusively on daytime ABPM BP values (old criterion) were able to better distinguish mortality in this studied CKD cohort.

Changes in Ambulatory Blood Pressure Phenotype over Time in Children and Adolescents with Elevated Blood Pressures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the stability of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) over time in children referred for evaluation of elevated BPs and assess for factors predicting change. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective chart review conducted at Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh identified 124 children referred for elevated BPs with 2 ABPM studies at least 6 months apart. All subjects received lifestyle counseling. Subjects with secondary hypertension (HTN) or on antihypertensive medication were excluded. ABPM phenotype was classified using American Heart Association guidelines as showing normal BP, prehypertension, and HTN. Generalized linear mixed effect regression models were used to regress stable, improving, or worsening HTN outcomes at study follow-up on baseline BP index and load variables. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 14.1 years (73% males) and the median interval between studies was 18 months. ABPM phenotype changed in 58 of 124 children, with 16% worsening and 31% improving. Older age was associated with persistence of HTN. Although not significant, decrease in body mass index z-score tracked with sustained normal ambulatory BPs. CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample size is small, our study suggests ABPM phenotype shows variability over time. Further study is required to identify factors supporting risk for progression of ABPM phenotype over time.

Impact of hypertension phenotypes on the office and 24-h pulse wave velocity and augmentation index in individuals with or without antihypertensive medication use.

Data on the association of blood pressure (BP) phenotypes with office and out-of-office markers of vascular stiffness and pressure wave reflection are sparse. This study investigated office and 24-h measures of brachial BP, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and central augmentation index (AIx) across hypertension phenotypes among individuals not using BP-lowering medications [normotension (NT), white-coat hypertension (WH), masked hypertension (MH) and sustained hypertension (SH)] and those using BP-lowering medications [controlled hypertension (CH), white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) and sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH)]. We evaluated 454 untreated (age = 45 ± 15 years, 50% males) and 238 treated (age = 52 ± 15 years, 45% males) individuals who underwent office and 24-h brachial BP, PWV, and AIx measures using a Mobil-O-Graph PWA monitor. In the analysis adjusted for age and sex, WH had higher (p < 0.05) office PWV (7.53 ± 0.09 vs 6.89 ± 0.05), office AIx (27.9 ± 1.3 vs 23.8 ± 0.8), and daytime AIx (24.6 ± 0.7 vs 22.7 ± 0.4) compared with those of NT, while WUCH had higher (p < 0.05) office PWV (8.28 ± 0.11 vs 7.43 ± 0.08) and 24-h PWV (7.54 ± 0.09 vs 7.21 ± 0.07) than those of CH. MH had higher (p < 0.05) 24-h PWV (7.00 ± 0.09 vs 6.69 ± 0.04) and 24-h AIx (24.3 ± 0.9 vs 21.9 ± 0.4) than those of NT, whereas MUCH had higher (p < 0.05) 24-h PWV (7.64 ± 0.13 vs 7.21 ± 0.07) than that of CH. Lastly, SH or SUCH had significantly higher office and 24-h PWV and AIx than those of NT and CH, respectively. In conclusion, these results suggest that individuals with masked BP phenotypes are more predisposed to have adverse out-of-office vascular characteristics, while individuals with white-coat phenotypes have adverse office and out-of-office vascular characteristics compared with those of individuals with normal BP levels.

Blood pressure cutoffs for white-coat and masked effects in a large population undergoing home blood pressure monitoring.

The values used to define the presence of white-coat or masked blood pressure (BP) effects are arbitrary. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of several cutoff points based on the difference between office and home BP (ΔBP) values to detect white-coat uncontrolled (WUCH) and masked uncontrolled (MUCH) hypertension, which are phenotypes with adverse prognoses, in a large cohort of treated hypertensive patients. This multicenter cross-sectional study included 6,049 treated hypertensive patients (40% males, mean age 59.1 ± 14.4 years) who underwent office and home BP monitoring. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, area under curve (AUC), and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of several ΔBP cutoffs to detect WUCH and MUCH. The 15/9 mmHg cutoff, which reflects a 1.0 standard deviation of the ΔBP, showed the best AUC (0.783, 95% CI = 0.772-0.794) for the detection of WUCH, particularly in individuals with office grade 1 hypertension (AUC = 0.811, 95% CI = 0.793-0.829). The -1/-1 mmHg cutoff, which considers all individuals who had lower systolic or diastolic BP levels in the office than at home, had the highest AUC (0.822, 95% CI = 0.808-0.836) for the detection of MUCH. Both cutoff values also had the best performances for identifying all patients with higher and lower office-than-home BP grades. In conclusion, the 15/9 and -1/-1 mmHg cutoffs showed the best performance for the detection of treated hypertensive patients with WUCH and MUCH, respectively, and therefore might be markers of significant white-coat and masked effects and could be useful for identifying preferential targets for more routine home BP measures.

Hipertensão arterial resistente (HAR) / Resistant arterial hypertension (RAH)

A hipertensão arterial resistente (HAR) é definida quando a pressão arterial (PA) permanece acima das metas recomendadas com o uso de três anti-hipertensivos de diferentes classes, incluindo um bloqueador do sistema renina- angiotensina (inibidor da enzima conversora da angiotensina [IECA] ou bloqueador do receptor de angiotensina [BRA]), um bloqueador dos canais de cálcio (BCC) de ação prolongada e um diurético tiazídico (DT) de longa ação em doses máximas preconizadas e toleradas, administradas com frequência, dosagem apropriada e comprovada adesão. Nesta definição está incluído o subgrupo de pacientes hipertensos resistentes, cuja PA é controlada com quatro ou mais medicamentos anti-hipertensivos, chamada de HAR controlada (HAR-C). A classificação da doença em HAR-C e HAR não controlada (HAR-NC), incluindo a HAR refratária (HAR-Ref), um fenótipo extremo de HAR-NC em uso de cinco ou mais anti-hipertensivos, é uma proposta que ganha espaço na literatura. Diante da suspeita clínica de HAR, é necessário verificar a confirmação diagnóstica, e a primeira etapa na investigação é a exclusão das causas de pseudorresistência, tais como falta de adesão ao tratamento (farmacológico e não farmacológico), posologia inadequada, técnica imprópria de aferição da PA e efeito do avental branco. O MAPA e o monitoramento residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA) são os exames para confirmação do controle inadequado da PA. Uma vez afastada a pseudorresistência, confirma-se a existência da HAR e inicia-se uma investigação diagnóstica com exames específicos, conforme a orientação das Diretrizes de Hipertensão em relação ao comprometimento de lesões em órgãos-alvo e hipertensão secundária. A ocorrência de comorbidades associadas deve ser detectada com exames especializados de acordo com a suspeita clínica. O objetivo do tratamento medicamentoso na HAR é detectar as causas do não controle e encontrar a melhor combinação de fármacos, visando o alcance das metas pressóricas com menor ocorrência de efeitos adversos e maior adesão. Em geral, busca-se otimizar o tratamento tríplice com os fármacos preferenciais, que são: IECA ou BRA, BCC di-hidropiridínico e DT.

Resistant hypertension (RHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) persistently above the recommended target values despite the use of three antihypertensive agents of different classes, including one blocker of the renin- angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEI] or angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]), one long- acting calcium channel blocker (CCB), and one long-acting thiazide diuretic (TD) at maximum recommended and tolerated doses, administered with appropriate frequency and doses and with proven adherence. The definition above includes a subgroup of patients with RHTN whose BP is controlled with four or more antihypertensive medications, known as controlled RHTN (C-RHTN). On clinical suspicion of RHTN, diagnostic confirmation is required, and the first step in the investigation is the exclusion of causes of pseudoresistance, such as lack of treatment adherence (pharmacological and non-pharmacological), inadequate dosing, improper BP measurement technique, and white-coat effect. Lack of BP control should be confirmed by ABPM and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM). Secondary hypertension (SecH) is defined as increased BP due to an identifiable cause. Patients with RH should be investigated for the most prevalent causes of "non-endocrine" and "endocrine" SecH after exclusion of use of medications that may interfere with BP values: antiinflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, nasal decongestants, appetite suppressants, antidepressants, immunosuppressants, erythropoietin, contraceptives, and illicit drugs. The objective of pharmacological treatment in RHTN is to identify the causes of lack of control and find the best combination of drugs, aiming at achieving the target BP with few adverse effects and greater adherence. In general, triple treatment optimization is attempted with preferred drugs, namely, ACEIs or ARBs, dihydropyridine CCBs, and TDs

White-coat, masked and sustained hypertension detected by home blood pressure monitoring in adolescents: prevalence and associated factors.

PURPOSE: Population-based studies estimating prevalence's of white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension in non-European adolescents are needed, particularly in developing countries. Aiming to determine these estimates and, additionally identify factors associated to these conditions this study was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study with a representative sample of secondary school students from a Brazilian state capital. Office measurements were performed with validated semi-automatic devices. Home BP (blood pressure) monitoring protocol included two day-time and two evening-time measurements over 6 days. Adolescents' were classified as: normotensives (office and home BP <95th percentile); sustained hypertensives (office and home BP ≥95th percentile); white-coat hypertensives (office BP ≥95th percentile and home BP <95th percentile) and masked hypertensives (office BP <95th percentile and home BP ≥95th percentile). Logistic regression models were built to identify if sex, age, BMI and family history of HTN were independently associated with white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension. RESULTS: In a sample of 1024 adolescents, prevalence of white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension was 7.5%, 2.2% and 1.7%, respectively. Male sex was positively associated with white-coat hypertension (OR 2.68; 95%CI 1.58-4.54; p < 0.001). BMI was positively associated with both white-coat (OR 1.23; 95%CI 1.16-1.30; p < 0.001) and sustained hypertension (OR 1.19; 95%CI 1.11-1.29; p < 0.001). None of the independent variables were associated with masked hypertension in this population. CONCLUSION: The estimated prevalence of white-coat hypertension, masked and sustained hypertension in a population of non-European adolescents assessed by home BP monitoring was 7.5%, 2.2% and 1.7% respectively. Male sex was positively associated with white-coat hypertension in these adolescents while BMI was positively associated with both white-coat and sustained hypertension.

Aspectos clínicos actuales del monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial / Current clinical aspects of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Resumen La hipertensión arterial sistémica es la enfermedad de mayor prevalencia a nivel mundial que incrementa de forma importante el riesgo cardiovascular. Un diagnóstico temprano, junto al logro de metas, disminuye de forma importante el riesgo de complicaciones. Recientemente se han actualizado los criterios diagnósticos para la hipertensión, así como la introducción del monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial. La introducción en la práctica clínica del monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial fue para ayudar al diagnóstico de la "hipertensión de bata blanca" y la "hipertensión enmascarada". En la actualidad también se ha demostrado que el monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial es superior al método tradicional de registro de presión arterial en el consultorio, tanto para el diagnóstico como para el adecuado control y ajuste del tratamiento farmacológico. Además se han introducido nuevos conceptos de suma importancia como la hipertensión arterial nocturna aislada, la elevación matutina alterada de la presión arterial y los patrones alterados de descenso nocturno de la presión arterial; los cuales se han asociado a un incremento de riesgo cardiovascular. Varios estudios han mostrado relevante valor pronóstico en algunas poblaciones. Aún existen otros conceptos en los cuales hace falta un mayor estudio para establecer adecuadamente su introducción en la práctica clínica como la carga hipertensiva, la variabilidad, la presión de pulso y la rigidez arterial; además de establecer valores de acuerdo a más estudios clínicos en poblaciones como pacientes geriátricos y niños.

Abstract Systemic arterial hypertension is the prevalentest disease worldwide that significantly increases cardiovascular risk. An early diagnosis together to achieve goals decreases the risk of complications significatly. Recently have been updated the diagnostic criteria for hypertension and the introduction of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The introduction into clinical practice of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was to assist the diagnosis of "white coat hypertension" and "masked hypertension". Today has also shown that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is better than the traditional method of recording blood pressure in the office, to the diagnosis and to adequate control and adjustment of drug treatment. Also there have been introduced important new concepts such as isloted nocturnal hypertension, morning blood pressure elevation altered and altered patterns of nocturnal dip in blood pressure; which have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Several studies have shown significant prognostic value in some stocks. There are still other concepts on which further study is needed to properly establish their introduction to clinical practice as hypertensive load variability, pulse pressure and arterial stiffness. In addition to setting values according to further clinical studies in populations such as elderly and children.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: Five Decades of More Light and Less Shadows / Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial: Cinco Décadas de mais Luzes e Menos Sombras

Abstract Casual blood pressure measurements have been extensively questioned over the last five decades. A significant percentage of patients have different blood pressure readings when examined in the office or outside it. For this reason, a change in the paradigm of the best manner to assess blood pressure has been observed. The method that has been most widely used is the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring - ABPM. The method allows recording blood pressure measures in 24 hours and evaluating various parameters such as mean BP, pressure loads, areas under the curve, variations between daytime and nighttime, pulse pressure variability etc. Blood pressure measurements obtained by ABPM are better correlated, for example, with the risks of hypertension. The main indications for ABPM are: suspected white coat hypertension and masked hypertension, evaluation of the efficacy of the antihypertensive therapy in 24 hours, and evaluation of symptoms. There is increasing evidence that the use of ABPM has contributed to the assessment of blood pressure behaviors, establishment of diagnoses, prognosis and the efficacy of antihypertensive therapy. There is no doubt that the study of 24-hour blood pressure behavior and its variations by ABPM has brought more light and less darkness to the field, which justifies the title of this review.

Resumo Nas últimas cinco décadas muito têm sido questionadas as medidas casuais da pressão arterial (PA). Significativa porcentagem de pacientes apresenta PA muito diversa quando examinados na clínica ou fora dela. Por isso, é hoje observada uma mudança de paradigma com relação ao melhor modo de se avaliar a PA. O método que mais se consolidou é a Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial - MAPA. É possível obter-se o registro de medidas de PA durante 24 horas avaliando-se vários parâmetros como: médias de PA, cargas de pressão, áreas sob as curvas, variações entre vigília e sono, variabilidade de pressão de pulso etc. As medidas de PA obtidas pela MAPA são mais bem correlacionadas, por exemplo, com os riscos da hipertensão arterial. As principais indicações para a MAPA são: suspeita de hipertensão do avental branco e da hipertensão mascarada, avaliação da eficácia terapêutica nas 24 horas e avaliação de sintomas. Crescem as evidências de que o emprego da MAPA contribui para avaliar os comportamentos da PA, estabelecer diagnósticos, prognóstico e avaliar a eficácia terapêutica anti-hipertensiva. Sem dúvidas, o estudo do comportamento da PA e suas variações durante as 24 horas pela MAPA nos deixaram com menos sombras e mais luzes, e justifica o título desta revisão.

[Current clinical aspects of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring]. / Aspectos clínicos actuales del monitoreo ambulatorio de presión arterial.

Systemic arterial hypertension is the prevalentest disease worldwide that significantly increases cardiovascular risk. An early diagnosis together to achieve goals decreases the risk of complications significatly. Recently have been updated the diagnostic criteria for hypertension and the introduction of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The introduction into clinical practice of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was to assist the diagnosis of «white coat hypertension¼ and «masked hypertension¼. Today has also shown that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is better than the traditional method of recording blood pressure in the office, to the diagnosis and to adequate control and adjustment of drug treatment. Also there have been introduced important new concepts such as isloted nocturnal hypertension, morning blood pressure elevation altered and altered patterns of nocturnal dip in blood pressure; which have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Several studies have shown significant prognostic value in some stocks. There are still other concepts on which further study is needed to properly establish their introduction to clinical practice as hypertensive load variability, pulse pressure and arterial stiffness. In addition to setting values according to further clinical studies in populations such as elderly and children.

Hipertensión matinal y comportamiento non-dipper en embarazadas con hipertensión de guardapolvo blanco / Morning Hypertension and Non-dipper Behavior in Pregnant Women with White Coat Syndrome

Introducción: La hipertensión de guardapolvo blanco (HGB) es común en el embarazo, aunque su evolución clínica durante la gestación se conoce poco. La hipertensión matinal y el comportamiento non-dipper, medidos por monitoreo ambulatorio de la presión arterial (MAPA), se asocian con mayor riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares; no obstante ello, son escasos los estudios en la gestación. Objetivos: El objetivo primario del estudio fue evaluar la hipertensión matinal y el comportamiento non-dipper en embarazadas con HGB versus un grupo control de normotensas. Se planteó como objetivo secundario evaluar si la HGB, la hipertensión matinal y el comportamiento non-dipper en el segundo trimestre del embarazo se relacionan con mayor hipertensión sostenida en el tercer trimestre. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo en el que se incluyeron 95 primigestas en la semana 20 de gestación, 50 con HGB y 45 normotensas como grupo control. Se registraron laboratorio de rutina, presión de consultorio y MAPA en la inclusión y a las 32 semanas de gestación. La hipertensión matinal y el comportamiento non-dipper se evaluaron por MAPA. Resultados: La edad, la glucemia y la presión diurna y nocturna por MAPA fueron similares en el examen basal en ambos grupos. Por el contrario, las pacientes con HGB presentaron valores significativamente superiores de hipertensión matinal y comportamiento non-dipper, lo cual se asoció en forma independiente con hipertensión sostenida en el tercer trimestre del embarazo. Conclusiones: Las gestantes con HGB en la semana 20 de embarazo presentaron mayor hipertensión matinal y comportamiento non-dipper y evolucionaron con más frecuencia a hipertensión sostenida que el grupo control de normotensas.

Background: White coat syndrome (WCS) is common during pregnancy, although little is known about its clinical outcome during gestation. Morning hypertension and the non-dipper behavior, measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), are associated with greater risk of cardiovascular events. However, there are few studies during pregnancy. Objectives: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate morning hypertension and the non-dipper behavior in pregnant women with WCS versus a control normotensive group. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether WCS, morning hypertension and the non-dipper behavior in the second trimester of pregnancy were associated with greater hypertension in the third trimester. Methods: This prospective study included 95 primiparae in the 20th week of gestation, 50 with WCS and 45 as normotensive control group. Routine lab tests, office blood pressure and ABPM at inclusion and in the 32th week of gestation were recorded. Morning hypertension and the non-dipper behavior were evaluated by ABPM. Results: Age, and baseline blood glucose level and daytime and nighttime blood pressure by ABPM were similar in both groups. Conversely, patients presenting WCS had significantly higher values of morning hypertension and non-dipper behavior, which were independently associated with sustained hypertension in the third trimester of pregnancy. Conclusions: Pregnant women with WCS in the 20th week of gestation presented greater morning hypertension and non-dipper behavior and progressed more frequently to sustained hypertension than the control normotensive group.

White coat effect and masked uncontrolled hypertension in treated hypertensive-diabetic patients: Prevalence and target organ damage.

BACKGROUND: The association between hypertensive phenotypes of controlled hypertension (CH), white-coat effect (WCE), masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUH) and sustained hypertension (SH) with target organ damage have not been clearly established in diabetic hypertensive treated patients. The present study aims to evaluate the prevalence of the four phenotypes considering the current cut-off points for office and 24 h-ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and the association with left ventricle hypertrophy (LVH), diastolic function and nephropathy. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 304 patients on anti-hypertensive treatment aged 57.6 ± 6.1 years, who were submitted to ABPM and echocardiography. They were classified into CH (normal office BP and ABPM), WCE (high office BP and normal ABPM), MUH (normal office BP and high ABPM), and SH (high office BP and ABPM). RESULTS: Median HbA1c and diabetes duration were 7.9% (6.8-9.2), and 10 years (5-16), respectively. Prevalences of CH, WCE, MUH and SH were 27.3%, 17.1%, 18.8%, and 36.8%. MUH prevalence was higher than previously described. There was a significant increasing trend across the four groups in variables related to LVH (P < 0.001 for trend). There was not a clear "dose-response" relationship of the four hypertensive phenotypes with nephropathy and diastolic function. CONCLUSION: The use of ABPM beyond the traditional cardiovascular risk stratification tools has limitations, but is still useful in high-risk patients. Longitudinal studies could better evaluate the role of the use of ABPM in this scenario. Cut-off points for normality of office and ABPM influence the prevalences of WCH and MUH.

Circadian autonomic disturbance in resistant hypertension with and without white coat phenomenon / Distúrbios autonômicos do ritmo circadiano na hipertensão resistente com e sem o fenômeno do avental branco

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A definição de hipertensão arterial resistente inclui pacientes cuja pressão arterial permanece acima da meta apesar do uso de 3 classes de anti-hipertensivos bem como aqueles que usam 4 ou mais classes e possuem pressão controlada. A monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial é um método indispensável para o diagnóstico da hipertensão arterial resistente, excluindo a pseudorresistência, e classificar o hipertenso resistente em 2 grupos: hipertensão arterial resistente sem e com a presença do fenômeno do avental-branco. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o perfil circadiano autonômico da hipertensão arterial resistente com e sem resposta ao fenômeno do avental-branco. MÉTODOS: Quarenta e quatro pacientes com hipertensão arterial resistente foram divididos em dois grupos: hipertensão arterial resistente com presença do fenômeno do avental-branco (n=25) e hipertensão arterial resistente sem presença do fenômeno do avental-branco (n=19). Todos os pacientes foram submetidos à medida da pressão arterial de escritório, monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial e eletrocardiografia ambulatorial para análise da variabilidade da frequência cardíaca. RESULTADOS: Não foram observadas diferenças entre a hipertensão arterial resistente com e sem a presença do fenômeno do avental-branco em relação à idade, índice de massa corporal ou de gênero. No grupo de hipertensão arterial resistente com a presença do fenômeno do avental-branco observou-se maior desequilíbrio autonômico avaliado por parâmetros da variabilidade da frequência cardíaca no domínio da frequência em comparação aos pacientes sem o fenômeno do avental-branco. Além disso, os parâmetros da variabilidade da frequência cardíaca noturnos no grupo da hipertensão arterial resistente com a presença do fenômeno do avental-branco correlacionaram-se positivamente com a hipertensão arterial resistente e pressão de pulso de consultório (r=0,57, p<0,05 er=0,55, p<0,05, respectivamente)...

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The current definition of resistant hypertension includes both patients whose blood pressure is uncontrolled on three or more medications and those whose blood pressure is controlled when using four or more antihypertensive medications. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is an indispensable method to diagnose resistant hypertension and classify it into 2 groups: resistant hypertension without white-coat response and resistant hypertension with white-coat response. The aim of this study was to evaluate the circadian autonomic profile of resistant hypertension with and without white-coat phenomenon. METHODS: Forty four resistant hypertension patients were divided into two groups: resistant hypertension with white-coat phenomenon (n=25) and resistant hypertension without white-coat (n=19) phenomenon. All patients underwent office blood pressure measurement, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and 24-hour Holter monitoring. RESULTS: No differences were observed between the resistant hypertension with white-coat phenomenon and resistant hypertension without white-coat phenomenon groups regarding age, body mass index or gender. The group of resistant hypertension with white-coat phenomenon had greater autonomic imbalance evaluated by heart rate variability parameters in frequency domain compared to resistant hypertension patients without white-coat phenomenon. Moreover, nighttime frequency domain parameters of resistant hypertension group with white-coat phenomenon correlated positively with office resistant hypertension and office pulse pressure (r=0.57, p<0.05 and r=0.55, p<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The presence of the white-coat response in resistant hypertension patients implies worse autonomic imbalance...

A monitorização residencial da pressão arterial e o controle de um grupo de hipertensos / Home blood pressure monitoring and control in a group of hypertensive patients / Monitoreo residencial de la presión arterial y control de un grupo de hipertensos

Comparar a medida de consultório com a monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA), avaliar o controle da pressão e caracterizar o efeito do avental branco. Pesquisa de campo, quantitativa com 71 hipertensos. A medida da pressão em consultório foi feita pela enfermeira. A monitorização residencial da pressão arterial foi realizada durante 7 dias. O efeito do avental branco foi quantificado para diferenças entre a medida de consultório e a monitorização residencial da pressão arterial nas faixas 1 a 5, 6 a 10 e > 10 mmHg. A medida da pressão de consultório foi significativamente maior (p<0,05) do que a monitorização residencial da pressão arterial. O controle da pressão foi 9,9% na medida de consultório e 23,9% na MRPA. O efeito do avental branco > 10 mmHg para a sistólica foi 57,7% e para a diastólica, 32,4%, na faixa de 6 a 10 mmHg. A medida da pressão em casa avaliou melhor o controle dos hipertensos.

This qualitative study was performed with 71 hypertensive patients, with the objectives to compare outpatient and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), to assess blood pressure control, and characterize white-coat hypertension. A nurse performed the outpatient blood pressure measurement. The home blood pressure monitoring was carried out over seven days. White-coat hypertension was quantified as a difference between the outpatient measurement and home blood pressure monitoring in the ranges from 1 to 5, 6 to 10 and > 10 mmHg. The outpatient blood pressure measurement was significantly higher (p<0.05) than the home blood pressure measurement. Pressure control corresponded to 9.9% in the outpatient measurement and 23.9% in the home blood pressure measurement. The white-coat effect > 10 mmHg was 57.7% for systolic and 32.4% for diastolic pressure, in the range from 6 to 10 mmHg. Home blood pressure measurement provided a better assessment of hypertensive patients' control.

Comparación de la medición en consultorio con el monitoreo residencial de la presión arterial (MRPA), evaluación del control de presión y caracterización del efecto del delantal blanco. Investigación de campo, cuantitativa, con 71 hipertensos. La medición de presión en consultorio fue realizada por la enfermera. El MRPA se efectuó durante siete días. El efecto del delantal blanco se cuantificó para diferencias entre la medición de consultorio y el MRPA en las fajas 1-5, 6-10 y >10mmHg. La medición de presión en consultorio fue significativamente mayor (p<0,05) que el monitoreo residencial de presión arterial. La presión se mantuvo bajo control en el 9,9% de la medición de consultorio y 23,9% de la MRPA. El efecto del delantal blanco >10 mmHg para la sistólica fue de 57,7% y para la diastólica, 32,4%, en la faja 6-10 mmHg. La medición de presión domiciliaria evaluó mejor el control de los hipertensos.

Prevalência de hipertensão resistente em adultos não idosos: estudo prospectivo em contexto ambulatorial / Prevalence of resistant hypertension in non-elderly adults: prospective study in a clinical setting

FUNDAMENTO: Em face de definições de variáveis e critérios de amostragem, a real prevalência de hipertensão resistente em ambiente clínico é desconhecida. OBJETIVO: Investigar a prevalência de real hipertensão resistente em uma clínica de hipertensão arterial. MÉTODOS: Hipertensão resistente verdadeira foi diagnosticada quando fenômeno do jaleco branco, insuficiente adesão ao tratamento e hipertensão secundária foram excluídos em pacientes com Pressão Arterial (PA) ≥ 140/90 mmHg em duas visitas consecutivas, usando três de fármacos anti-hipertensivos, incluindo um diurético. RESULTADOS: No total, 606 pacientes, com 35 a 65 anos de idade, a maioria mulheres, com PA de 156,8 ± 23,8 mmHg por 91,9 ± 15,6 mmHg e IMC de 29,7 ± 5,9 Kg/m² foram sequencialmente avaliados. Cento e seis pacientes em uso de três agentes anti-hipertensivos estavam com pressão arterial não controlada (17,5% da amostra total) na primeira visita. Oitenta e seis pacientes (81% dos pacientes com PA não controlada na primeira avaliação) retornaram para a avaliação de confirmação: 25 estavam com PA controlada; 21 tinham evidência de baixa adesão ao tratamento; 13 tinham fenômeno do jaleco branco; e 9 tinham hipertensão secundária, restando 18 pacientes (20,9% dos não controlados na consulta de confirmação e 3% da amostra total) com verdadeira hipertensão resistente. Considerando pacientes com hipertensão secundária como casos de hipertensão refratária, a prevalência de hipertensão resistente aumentou para 4,5%. CONCLUSÃO: A frequência de hipertensão resistente verdadeira em pacientes não idosos é baixa em um ambiente clínico, e não é substancialmente aumentada com a inclusão de pacientes com hipertensão secundária. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0).

BACKGROUND: In face of variable definitions and sampling criteria, the real prevalence of resistant hypertension in a clinical setting is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prevalence of true resistant hypertension in an outpatient hypertension clinic. METHODS: True resistant hypertension was diagnosed when white coat phenomenon, lack of compliance and secondary hypertension were excluded in patients with blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg in two consecutive visits, despite to be using three blood pressure-lowering agents, including a diuretic. RESULTS: In the total, 606 patients, with 35 to 65 years of age, mostly women, with BP of 156.8 ± 23.8 mmHg by 91.9 ± 15.6 mmHg and a BMI of 29.7 ± 5.9 Kg/m² were sequentially evaluated. One hundred and six patients using three BP drugs had uncontrolled blood pressure (17.5% of the whole sample) in the first visit. Eighty-six patients (81% of the patients with uncontrolled BP in the first evaluation) returned for the confirmatory evaluation. Twenty-five had controlled BP, 21 had evidence of low adherence to treatment, 13 had white coat phenomenon and 9 had secondary hypertension, leaving only 18 patients (20.9% of those uncontrolled in the confirmatory visit and 3% of the whole sample) with true resistant hypertension. Considering patients with secondary hypertension as cases of resistant hypertension, the prevalence of resistant hypertension increased to 4.5%. CONCLUSION: The frequency of patients with true resistant hypertension in non-elderly patients is low in a clinical setting, and is not substantially increased with the inclusion of patients with secondary hypertension. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0).

Hipertensión de guardapolvo blanco: evolución a hipertensión sostenida luego de 10 años de seguimiento / Progression of White Coat Hypertension to Sustained Hypertension After 10 Year Follow-up / Progression of White Coat Hypertension to Sustained Hypertension After 10 Year Follow-up

Introducción No obstante la amplia información en la bibliografía sobre la caracterización de la hipertensión de guardapolvo blanco (HGB), su evolución alejada es hasta el presente tema de controversia. Objetivo Evaluar la incidencia acumulada de hipertensión sostenida (HS) en hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco respecto de normotensos a los 10 años de su inclusión en el estudio. Material y métodos Se incorporaron en forma prospectiva 250 pacientes de ambos sexos, según los siguientes valores de presión de consultorio (PC) y de monitoreo ambulatorio de la presión arterial (MAPA) de 24 horas: Se conformaron dos grupos: 129 hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco y 121 normotensos, los cuales fueron evaluados nuevamente a los 10 años de seguimiento. Se midieron la glucemia, el perfil lipídico y el índice de masa ventricular izquierda (IMVI). Resultados Las variables edad, sexo, tabaquismo y glucemia de normotensos e hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco fueron similares en el examen basal. Los hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco, por el contrario, presentaron valores significativamente superiores en IMC, colesterol total, hipertrigliceridemia e IMVI. Cuarenta y ocho hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco y 21 normotensos originales evolucionaron a HS. La HGB se asoció en forma independiente con HS a los 10 años de seguimiento OR: 2,5 (IC 95% 1,2-4,2). Conclusión La evolución a hipertensión sostenida fue mayor en los hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco que en los normotensos.(AU)

Background The long-term outcome of white coat hypertension (WCH) is still controversial despite the broad information currently available. Objective To evaluate the cumulative incidence of sustained hypertension (SH) among patients with white coat hypertension compared to normotensive patients 10 years after being included in the study. Methods A total of 250 patients of both genders were prospectively included with the following office blood pressure (OBP) and 24- hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) values: The patients were divided into two groups: 129 patients with WCH and 121 normotensive patients, and were evaluated after 10 years of follow-up. Glucose blood level, lipid profile and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were measured. Results Age, gender, smoking habits and glucose blood level were similar at baseline among normotensive patients and patients with white coat hypertension. Yet, BMI, total cholesterol levels, lipid levels and LVMI were significantly greater in white-coat hypertensive patients. Sustained hypertension was developed by 48 patients with WCH and 21 normotensive patients. We found an independent association between WCH and SH at 10 years of follow-up OR: 2.5 (95% CI 1.2-4.2). Conclusion Progression to sustained hypertension was greater in patients with white coat hypertension compared to normotensive patients.(AU)

Hipertensión de guardapolvo blanco: evolución a hipertensión sostenida luego de 10 años de seguimiento / Progression of White Coat Hypertension to Sustained Hypertension After 10 Year Follow-up / Progression of White Coat Hypertension to Sustained Hypertension After 10 Year Follow-up

Introducción No obstante la amplia información en la bibliografía sobre la caracterización de la hipertensión de guardapolvo blanco (HGB), su evolución alejada es hasta el presente tema de controversia. Objetivo Evaluar la incidencia acumulada de hipertensión sostenida (HS) en hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco respecto de normotensos a los 10 años de su inclusión en el estudio. Material y métodos Se incorporaron en forma prospectiva 250 pacientes de ambos sexos, según los siguientes valores de presión de consultorio (PC) y de monitoreo ambulatorio de la presión arterial (MAPA) de 24 horas: Se conformaron dos grupos: 129 hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco y 121 normotensos, los cuales fueron evaluados nuevamente a los 10 años de seguimiento. Se midieron la glucemia, el perfil lipídico y el índice de masa ventricular izquierda (IMVI). Resultados Las variables edad, sexo, tabaquismo y glucemia de normotensos e hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco fueron similares en el examen basal. Los hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco, por el contrario, presentaron valores significativamente superiores en IMC, colesterol total, hipertrigliceridemia e IMVI. Cuarenta y ocho hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco y 21 normotensos originales evolucionaron a HS. La HGB se asoció en forma independiente con HS a los 10 años de seguimiento OR: 2,5 (IC 95% 1,2-4,2). Conclusión La evolución a hipertensión sostenida fue mayor en los hipertensos de guardapolvo blanco que en los normotensos.

Background The long-term outcome of white coat hypertension (WCH) is still controversial despite the broad information currently available. Objective To evaluate the cumulative incidence of sustained hypertension (SH) among patients with white coat hypertension compared to normotensive patients 10 years after being included in the study. Methods A total of 250 patients of both genders were prospectively included with the following office blood pressure (OBP) and 24- hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) values: The patients were divided into two groups: 129 patients with WCH and 121 normotensive patients, and were evaluated after 10 years of follow-up. Glucose blood level, lipid profile and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were measured. Results Age, gender, smoking habits and glucose blood level were similar at baseline among normotensive patients and patients with white coat hypertension. Yet, BMI, total cholesterol levels, lipid levels and LVMI were significantly greater in white-coat hypertensive patients. Sustained hypertension was developed by 48 patients with WCH and 21 normotensive patients. We found an independent association between WCH and SH at 10 years of follow-up OR: 2.5 (95% CI 1.2-4.2). Conclusion Progression to sustained hypertension was greater in patients with white coat hypertension compared to normotensive patients.